Connect with us

Sports

Ranking ACC basketball programs as a generational talent and three new teams join the conference

Published

on

Ranking ACC basketball programs as a generational talent and three new teams join the conference

College basketball preseason trips are already underway. (We hear the Bahamas are lovely this time of year, Louisville. Shame our invite got lost!) That’s our sign that rosters are basically finalized, and it’s finally worth asking the question:

How’s the ACC looking?

If nothing else, larger. Cal, Stanford, and SMU are now officially members, meaning the 18-team “Atlantic Coast” Conference stretches the width of the United States and the length of the East Coast. But the league has plenty to boast about. No conference has sent more teams to the Final Four the past three seasons than the ACC (four), with four different programs — North Carolina, Duke, Miami, and NC State — each making an appearance. As for the future, the ACC is bringing in nine five-star freshmen, the most of any conference — and more than the Big 12 and Big East combined. The conference has four of the nation’s top 15 recruiting classes, per 247Sports: No. 1 Duke, No. 7 Miami, No. 8 UNC, and No. 14 Georgia Tech. Two others, Clemson and Notre Dame, crack the top 25.

The transfer portal was less kind to the league, though there are still plenty of contributors coming in. But of The Athletic’s top 100 transfers, none of the top 15 joined the ACC. Only 13 of the top 100 best-available players picked ACC schools, with no league member ranking in the top 20 nationally in transfer portal hauls.

Still, the league has plenty of experience, with some of its teams built more around experienced stars. A third of the ACC has at least four players with more than 2,000 career Division I minutes, and nine different teams have at least one player with more than 3,000.

Advertisement

Balance that with three new coaches — Pat Kelsey (Louisville), Andy Enfield (SMU), and Kyle Smith (Stanford) — and there is plenty to look forward to this ACC season. Here’s how we see it all shaking out, with a deeper look at every team’s roster.

1. Duke

Biggest losses: Kyle Filipowski (16.4 ppg, 8.3 rpg); Jared McCain (14.3 ppg, 5 rpg); Jeremy Roach (14 ppg, 3 apg); Mark Mitchell (11.6 ppg, 6 rpg)

Returning rotation players: Tyrese Proctor (10.5 ppg, 3.7 apg); Caleb Foster (7.7 ppg)

Top 100 freshmen added: No. 1 Cooper Flagg, No. 6 Khaman Maluach, No. 14 Isaiah Evans, No. 18 Kon Knueppel, No. 26 Patrick Ngongba II, No. 39 Darren Harris

Top 100 transfers added: None

Advertisement

Why they’re here: How can a team that lost its top four scorers and returns only two rotation players top our rankings? Because of who it’s bringing in, starting with Flagg, the No. 1 recruit in the country. The Maine native has long been viewed as a generational talent. He should be on campus only about nine months, before likely becoming the top pick in the 2025 draft.

That explains many of Jon Scheyer’s offseason roster moves. The third-year coach offloaded several high-profile recruits, including four former five-stars, in favor of plug-and-play transfers who complement Flagg’s skill set. In comes Mason Gillis (Purdue), the reigning Big Ten Sixth Man of the Year and a career 40.7 percent 3-point shooter with national championship game experience. Maliq Brown (Syracuse), an All-ACC defender; and Sion James (Tulane), a wrecking ball of a wing who has played almost 4,000 D-I minutes, also arrived. Then there’s the rest of Duke’s elite recruiting class, including four other five-star talents — like Maluach, the raw 7-foot-2 South Sudanese center who just appeared in the Olympics — to round out the rotation. Proctor and Foster need to stay healthy after missing time last season. If they do? Duke has the experience, top-end talent and role definition necessary to make a national championship run.

GO DEEPER

Nice to meet you: All the new (and old) names to know in the SEC

2. North Carolina

Biggest losses: Armando Bacot (14.5 ppg, 10.3 rpg); Harrison Ingram (12.2 ppg, 8.8 rpg); Cormac Ryan (11.5 ppg)

Advertisement

Returning rotation players: RJ Davis (21.2 ppg, 3.5 apg); Elliot Cadeau (7.3 ppg, 4.1 apg); Seth Trimble (4.2 ppg); Jae’Lyn Withers (4.2 ppg, 3.6 rpg); Jalen Washington (3.9 ppg)

Top 100 freshmen added: No. 8 Ian Jackson, No. 11 Drake Powell, No. 89 James Brown

Top 100 transfers added: No. 16 Cade Tyson (Belmont)

Why they’re here: You can’t do better than bringing back a first-team All-American guard like Davis, arguably the best returning player in all of college basketball. Losing three other starters, including Bacot, stings, but Davis alone raises the ceiling in Chapel Hill. With him, Cadeau, Trimble and top-10 recruit Jackson — already earning rave reviews this summer from the coaching staff — UNC should have one of the best perimeter groups in the sport.

Add in Tyson, a career 44.6 percent 3-point shooter, and Powell, who could be the team’s best defender from Day 1, and Hubert Davis’ team is set on the wings. The frontcourt is where things get a little hairier. UNC added Ven-Allen Lubin (Vanderbilt) late in the portal window to fortify its interior, and either he or Washington needs to emerge as an every-game starting center. If so, then the Tar Heels can challenge rival Duke for the conference title — and there’s no telling how far Davis can take UNC in March.

Advertisement

Career Division I minutes on roster

Team Minutes

20,677 (5 players with 2,000-plus)

18,252 (5 players with 2,000-plus)

16,988 (5 players with 2,000-plus)

15,869 (4 players with 2,000-plus)

Advertisement

15,236 (4 players with 2,000-plus)

14,876 (2 players with 2,000-plus)

13,246 (4 players with 2,000-plus)

13,221 (3 players with 2,000-plus)

12,538 (3 players with 2,000-plus)

Advertisement

12,111 (2 players with 2,000-plus)

12,007 (3 players with 2,000-plus)

11,929 (one player with 2,000-plus)

9,859 (2 players with 2,000-plus)

9,063 (one player with 2,000-plus)

Advertisement

8,466 (2 players with 2,000-plus)

8,077 (1 player with 2,000-plus)

6,182 (1 player with 2,000-plus)

5,456 (1 player with 2,000-plus)

3. Louisville

Biggest losses: Skyy Clark (13.2 ppg); Brandon Huntley-Hatfield (12.9 ppg, 8.4 rpg); Mike James (12.6 ppg, 5 rpg); Tre White (12.3 ppg, 5.9 rpg); JJ Traynor (10.1 ppg, 4.6 rpg); Ty-Laur Johnson (8.7 ppg, 3.6 apg); Curtis Williams (5.3 ppg); Kaleb Glenn (3.9 ppg)

Advertisement

Returning rotation players: None

Top 100 freshmen added (1): No. 34 Khani Rooths

Top 100 transfers added (4): No. 17 Terrence Edwards Jr. (James Madison), No. 46 Chucky Hepburn (Wisconsin), No. 61 J’Vonne Hadley (Colorado), No. 70 Kasean Pryor (South Florida)

Why they’re here: Can you rebuild a whole program in a single offseason? We’re about to find out, with Louisville as the national test case. The Cardinals got rid of their coach, their entire roster and somehow still ended up with the most experienced and productive group of players in the ACC.

Pat Kelsey’s team leads the league in D-I minutes played, career made 3s and top 100 transfers added — but no one, obviously, has done anything in a UL uniform. Still, having five players with over 2,000 career D-I minutes, plus five who have made at least 50 career 3s, should be a boon for Kelsey’s 3-point happy offense. In Kelsey’s 12 years as head coach, his teams have finished in the top 75 in 3-point rate 10 times — including last season, when College of Charleston finished 17th nationally after taking 46.9 percent of its shots from deep.

Advertisement

Among the notable additions: Edwards, the Sun Belt Player of the Year who led JMU to a program-best 32 wins; Hepburn, an All-Big Ten defender and three-year starter; and Pryor, who led USF to 21 wins in 22 games last season after becoming a starter. This ranking is admittedly a gamble on Kelsey getting all the players to coalesce, but Louisville has the talent to make one of the biggest year-to-year leaps in the sport — and get back to the NCAA Tournament.

4. Miami

Biggest losses: Norchad Omier (17 ppg, 10 rpg); Wooga Poplar (13.1 ppg, 4.8 rpg); Bensley Joseph (9.6 ppg); Kyshawn George (7.6 ppg)

Returning rotation players: Matthew Cleveland (13.7 ppg, 6.1 rpg); Nijel Pack (13.3 ppg, 3.6 apg)

Top 100 freshmen added: No. 7 Jalil Bethea, No. 50 Austin Swartz

Top 100 transfers added: No. 84 Brandon Johnson (East Carolina), No. 91 Lynn Kidd (Virginia Tech)

Advertisement

Why they’re here: Last season’s Final Four encore was a train wreck as the Hurricanes struggled with injuries and depth. Losing Norchad Omier, a walking double-double and the program’s only real big man, was a tough blow, too. But Jim Larrañaga never stays down for long, proving it by hanging onto his best two perimeter players, signing the program’s highest-ranked recruit in nearly four decades, and adding much-needed, missing depth via the portal.

Including Pack and Cleveland, Miami has five players with at least 50 career made 3s — which ties the league lead — and that’s before factoring in Bethea, a knockdown shooter and projected lottery pick in next year’s NBA Draft. Kidd and Johnson add necessary size in the frontcourt, and Johnson can stretch the floor in ways Omier couldn’t. Don’t sleep on Jalen Blackmon (Stetson), either. Not only did the 6-3 guard average 21.3 points per game last season, the 14th-most in D-I, but he dropped 43 in the Atlantic Sun title game to send the Hatters to their first NCAA Tournament. The Hurricanes may be undersized again — par for the course lately under Larrañaga — and struggle defensively because of it, but all the pieces are there for another top-50 offense, plus a return to the Big Dance.

Biggest losses: Kevin “Boopie” Miller (15.6 ppg); Andrew Carr (13.5 ppg, 6.8 rpg); Damari Monsanto (5.1 ppg)

Returning rotation players: Hunter Sallis (18 ppg, 4.1 rpg); Cameron Hildreth (13.8 ppg, 4.7 rpg); Efton Reid III (9.6 ppg, 7.6 rpg); Parker Friedrichsen (5.1 ppg);

Top 100 freshmen added: No. 88 Juke Harris

Advertisement

Top 100 transfers added: None

Why they’re here: Only two first- or second-Team All-ACC players from last season are returning: Davis at UNC and Sallis at Wake Forest. The former five-star recruit pulled his name out of the NBA Draft — where he likely would’ve been a first-round pick — at the last minute, giving Steve Forbes the best returner he’s had yet in Winston-Salem.

That also means expectations in Forbes’ fifth season will be as high as ever. Making the NCAA Tournament, which the Demon Deacons have been close to the past three seasons, is paramount. That’s feasible with Sallis and two other starters back: Hildreth, one of the league’s craftier guards, and Reid, another former five-star recruit who stabilizes the frontcourt. Given Forbes’ track record in the transfer portal, we’re betting on big things from at least one of his additions. Maybe Omaha Biliew (Iowa State), another former five-star who could start at power forward? Or possibly Tre’Von Spillers (Appalachian State), who was named All-Sun Belt in his first season of D-I ball? Either way, with five of its top eight players back from last season — tied with UNC for the second-most in the ACC — Wake Forest has a strong enough foundation to get over the hump for the first time in the Forbes era.

Career made 3-pointers on roster

Team 3-pointers

853 (5 players with 50-plus)

Advertisement

755 (5 players with 50-plus)

685 (5 players with 50-plus)

515 (3 players with 50-plus)

512 (4 players with 50-plus)

489 (3 players with 50-plus)

Advertisement

476 (4 players with 50-plus)

471 (3 players with 50-plus)

427 (2 players with 50-plus)

416 (4 players with 50-plus)

394 (4 players with 50-plus)

Advertisement

373 (3 players with 50-plus)

344 (2 players with 50-plus)

299 (2 players with 50-plus)

261 (3 players with 50-plus)

252 (2 players with 50-plus)

Advertisement

201 (0 players with 50-plus)

185 (1 player with 50-plus)

Biggest losses: Blake Hinson (18.5 ppg, 4.4 rpg); Carlton “Bub” Carrington (13.8 ppg, 5.2 rpg, 4.1 apg); Federiko Federiko (4.7 ppg, 5.2 rpg)

Returning rotation players: Ishmael Leggett (12.3 ppg, 5.5 rpg); Jaland Lowe (9.6 ppg); Guillermo Diaz Graham (6.7 ppg); Zack Austin (6.5 ppg, 4.2 rpg); Jorge Diaz Graham (3.5 ppg)

Top 100 freshmen added: None

Advertisement

Top 100 transfers added: None

Why they’re here: Carrington, a surprise one-and-done, was Pitt’s best freshman last season, but Lowe — who averaged 13.1 points, 4.1 assists and 3.6 rebounds per game in his 19 games as a starter — wasn’t far behind. He could become a bona fide all-league player, and he’s already earning buzz as a potential first-round pick. Lowe’s the ideal set-up man for Pitt’s various returners, especially Leggett, the reigning ACC Sixth Man of the Year who dropped 30 points in the conference semifinals.

As for new arrivals, Damian Dunn (Houston) is finally free from Kelvin Sampson’s doghouse and can hopefully return to the potent scoring form (14.6 ppg) he showed in four seasons at Temple. Forward Cam Corhen (Florida State) provides another frontcourt presence who should thrive in pick-and-rolls with Lowe and Leggett. Jeff Capel’s team is in the top third of the league in career made 3s, and if it can capitalize on that shooting proficiency — like it did late last season, winning 10 of its final 13 games — then a second NCAA Tournament berth in three seasons is within reach.

7. Georgia Tech

Biggest losses: Miles Kelly (13.9 ppg, 5.5 rpg); Kyle Sturdivant (8.8 ppg); Dallan Coleman (5.9 ppg); Tafara Gapare (5.1 ppg); Tyzhaun Claude (4.8 ppg, 5.2 rpg); Amaree Abram (3.4 ppg)

Returning rotation players: Baye Ndongo (12.4 ppg, 8.2 rpg); Naithan George (9.8 ppg, 4.7 apg); Kowacie Reeves Jr. (9.8 ppg, 3.9 rpg); Lance Terry (10.1 ppg in 2022-23)

Advertisement

Top 100 freshmen added: No. 59 Jaeden Mustaf

Top 100 transfers added: No. 33 Javian McCollum (Oklahoma)

Why they’re here: This is higher than you’ll find the Yellow Jackets in other preseason rankings, but we’re calling our shot with Damon Stoudamire’s second squad: This team can make the NCAA Tournament. Georgia Tech returns three of its top four players, but most important among them are Ndongo — who posted the program’s best freshman stats since Chris Bosh and Derrick Favors — and George, who had the fourth-best assist rate in the ACC last season. Reeves is a highlight reel in waiting on the wing, and Terry, who missed all of last season with a calf injury, is a career 37.2 percent 3-point shooter who can prevent defenses from collapsing on Ndongo inside.

But McCollum is the other reason to be excited about GT. The nation’s second-best free-throw shooter last season (94.3 percent) is a pick-and-roll maestro who led the Sooners in scoring, and that’s even after his 3-point shot cratered in OU’s final 15 games. McCollum shot 39.8 percent from 3 in Oklahoma’s first 15 games … and 21.5 percent over its last 15. With him and George in the backcourt, pick-and-rolls with Ndongo should be as potent as any in the ACC. The Yellow Jackets are young — 11th in the ACC in D-I minutes — but should be fun.

8. Clemson

Biggest losses: PJ Hall (18.3 ppg, 6.4 rpg); Joseph Girard III (15.1 ppg); RJ Godfrey (6.1 ppg); Alex Hemenway (5.2 ppg); Jack Clark (4.7 ppg, 4.9 rpg)

Advertisement

Returning rotation players: Chase Hunter (12.9 ppg, 3.2 apg); Ian Schieffelin (10.1 ppg, 9.4 rpg); Chauncey Wiggins (5.4 ppg); Dillon Hunter (2.3 ppg)

Top 100 freshmen added: No. 79 Dallas Thomas

Top 100 transfers added: None

Why they’re here: There’s no sugarcoating the losses of Hall and Girard, who led or tied for the team lead in scoring 29 times in 36 games. They were the heart of Clemson’s Elite Eight team. But if there is good news, it’s that Hunter — who averaged 17.8 points, 5.8 assists, 4.3 rebounds, and 2 steals per game in four NCAA Tournament contests — is back for his sixth season of college hoops.

Moving from third to first on the opposing scouting report is no easy jump, but with Hunter and Schieffelin, the ACC’s Most Improved Player, back, Clemson has a solid floor. Those are two of the five Tigers with at least 2,000 D-I minutes, tied for the most in the league. But how will the other three — Jaeden Zackery (Boston College), Jake Heidbreder (Air Force), and Myles Foster (Illinois State) — acquit themselves? Probably well, but we wonder if they’ll be as impactful and consistent as the players Clemson lost.

Advertisement
go-deeper

GO DEEPER

Players, coaches, collective reps talk NIL: College basketball confidential

Biggest losses: Reece Beekman (14.3 ppg, 6.2 apg); Ryan Dunn (8.1 ppg, 6.9 rpg); Jacob Groves (7.4 ppg); Jordan Minor (4.3 ppg)

Returning rotation players: Isaac McKneely (12.3 ppg); Andrew Rohde (4.3 ppg); Blake Buchanan (3.4 ppg); Taine Murray (3.3 ppg)

Top 100 freshmen added: No. 87 Jacob Cofie

Top 100 transfers added: No. 89 TJ Power (Duke)

Advertisement

Why they’re here: With Virginia ranked this low, it’s fair to have the reaction: Is Tony Bennett not Virginia’s coach anymore? He is, and placing his team this low — considering the Cavaliers have finished top-three in the league eight times in the past 10 seasons — feels odd. But while UVa leaned into the transfer portal more fully this offseason, it still feels like the Cavaliers might be a player or two short.

McKneely, a top-50 shooter nationally last season, at least provides one guarantee, a potential all-league player with experience in Bennett’s system. Beyond that? Power is probably Virginia’s best hope for a second star, but how he’ll fare defensively is unclear. Elijah Saunders (San Diego State) and Jalen Warley (Florida State) come from defensive-minded programs, so they should make an immediate impact, but neither is an offensive dynamo. There’s a lot of projecting fit here, considering only Warley has played 2,000 career minutes, and only McKneely and Rohde — who looked out of his depth much of his first season in Charlottesville — have made 50 career 3s. Defense shouldn’t be the issue; offense, we’re in wait-and-see mode.

Returning top-8 players (by minutes)

Team

No. 1, No. 2, No. 3, No. 4, No. 5, No. 6, No. 8

No. 1, No. 2, No. 5, No. 6, No. 8

Advertisement

No. 1, No. 5, No. 6, No. 7, No. 8

No. 2, No. 4, No. 5, No. 8

No. 2, No. 4, No. 6, No. 8

No. 3, No. 4, No. 5, No. 7

No. 3, No. 4, No. 7, No. 8

Advertisement

No. 2, No. 6, No. 7

No. 2, No. 3, No. 4

No. 1, No. 4, No. 7

No. 7, No. 8

No. 4, No. 6

Advertisement

No. 2, No. 7

No. 2, No. 5

No. 3, No. 7

No. 7

No. 8

Advertisement

None

10. NC State

Biggest losses: DJ Horne (16.9 ppg); DJ Burns (12.9 ppg, 4 rpg); Casey Morsell (11.1 ppg); Mohammed Diarra (6.3 ppg, 7.8 rpg)

Returning rotation players: Jayden Taylor (11.2 ppg, 3.6 apg); Ben Middlebrooks (5.7 ppg, 4.4 rpg); Michael O’Connell (5.7 ppg, 3.2 apg); Dennis Parker (4.7 ppg)

Top 100 freshmen added: No. 56 Paul McNeil

Top 100 transfers added: No. 50 Brandon Huntley-Hatfield (Louisville)

Advertisement

Why they’re here: NC State’s epic postseason DJs, Horne and Burns, are both gone, and there’s no replicating the magic those two conjured in March. But Kevin Keatts capitalized on the Wolfpack’s Final Four berth as best he could. That started with retention. Keatts brought back ACC Tournament hero O’Connell as his full-time point guard, Taylor as his top shooter and Middlebrooks as his backup big. Landing Huntley-Hatfield — who should slide into (part of) NC State’s Burns-sized hole at center — was huge, too, and should allow the Wolfpack to be more versatile defensively.

Dontrez Styles (Georgetown) and Mike James (Louisville) put up big numbers on bad teams, and Marcus Hill (Bowling Green) was productive but inefficient. How those three adjust — or don’t — to more clearly defined roles should determine if the Wolfpack can make a third straight NCAA Tournament.

11. Syracuse

Biggest losses: Judah Mintz (18.8 ppg, 4.4 apg); Quadir Copeland (9.6 ppg, 4.6 rpg); Maliq Brown (9.5 ppg, 7.2 rpg); Justin Taylor (5 ppg, 4 rpg)

Returning rotation players: J.J. Starling (13.3 ppg); Chris Bell (12 ppg); Naheem McLeod (3.9 ppg, 4.3 rpg)

Top 100 freshmen added: No. 13 Donnie Freeman, No. 99 Elijah Moore

Advertisement

Top 100 transfers added: None

Why they’re here: Adrian Autry did about as well as expected in his first season: a 20-12 record, plus a top-85 offense and defense, per KenPom’s adjusted efficiency rankings. But that was mostly with Jim Boeheim’s old players. Now, Autry’s fingerprints are all over his second roster.

Starling and Bell are back as perimeter starters, and Bell — a 41.7 percent 3-point shooter last season — must carry the Orange from behind the arc. Freeman should snap the program’s NBA Draft dry spell — The Athletic’s Sam Vecenie listed him 12th on his initial 2025 big board — but hopefully not before making a major impact as a two-way college forward. It would not be a surprise if he ends up being Syracuse’s best player.

Two-time All-CAA wing Jyare Davis (Delaware) should be Autry’s most impactful transfer, although Eddie Lampkin Jr. (Colorado) provides size the Orange have lacked for several seasons. There’s an NCAA Tournament team here if all the new elements take, but it could also take Autry another year to get the program where he wants it.

12. Notre Dame

Biggest losses: Carey Booth (6.4 ppg, 4.3 rpg); Matt Zona (2.3 ppg)

Advertisement

Returning rotation players: Markus Burton (17.5 ppg, 4.3 apg); Braeden Shrewsberry (10.2 ppg); Tae Davis (9.2 ppg, 5.1 rpg); J.R. Konieczny (7.7 ppg, 4.5 rpg); Julian Roper II (5.4 ppg, 4 rpg); Kebba Njie (4.3 ppg, 5.4 rpg); Logan Imes (2 ppg)

Top 100 freshmen added: No. 68 Sir Mohammed

Top 100 transfers added: None

Why they’re here: Development is the mantra. The Fighting Irish, the sixth-youngest team in D-I last season, return seven of their top eight players from Micah Shrewsberry’s debut team. That’s the most in the league; no other program returns more than five.

Keeping Burton around gives Notre Dame one of the league’s highest-upside backcourts, and both guards should improve after taking their lumps as freshmen. But the Irish have only one player with 2,000 career minutes — sharpshooter Matt Allocco (Princeton), the team’s top incoming transfer — which is tied for the fewest in the ACC. The program is probably still a year or two away from being truly competitive, but Shrewsberry is quickly closing the gap.

Advertisement

13. SMU

Biggest losses: Zhuric Phelps (14.8 ppg, 4.1 rpg); Samuell Williamson (8.3 ppg, 7.1 rpg); Tyreek Smith (8.2 ppg, 5.4 rpg); Ricardo Wright (6.7 ppg); Jalen Smith (5.9 ppg); Ja’Heim Hudson (5.4 ppg)

Returning rotation players: Chuck Harris (13.4 ppg); Keon Ambrose-Hylton (6.9 ppg, 4.2 rpg); B.J. Edwards (3.7 ppg)

Top 100 freshmen added: None

Top 100 transfers added: No. 94 Kevin “Boopie” Miller (Wake Forest)

Why they’re here: Like Louisville, SMU is another fascinating test of what’s possible in the span of one offseason. The Mustangs have the second-most career minutes played of any ACC team, the third-most career 3-pointers, but four of their five most-experienced players arrived as transfers this spring.

Advertisement

Miller and Harris form an undersized but high-usage backcourt, and they’ll need to be the offensive drivers for Andy Enfield’s first team in Dallas. Yohan Traore (UC Santa Barbara) always had potential, but can he finally capitalize on it at his third school in three seasons? There is enough here to be competitive, but amid the competition jump from the American, unwieldy travel logistics, a new coach and so many moving pieces, it’s difficult to imagine SMU thriving right away.

14. California

Biggest losses: Jaylon Tyson (19.6 ppg, 6.8 rpg); Fardaws Aimaq (14.5 ppg, 11 rpg); Jalen Cone (13.4 ppg); Keonte Kennedy (9.3 ppg, 4.7 rpg); Jalen Celestine (8.7 ppg)

Returning rotation players: None

Top 100 freshmen added: None

Top 100 transfers added (2): No. 71 Andrej Stojakovic (Stanford), No. 92 Rytis Petraitis (Air Force)

Advertisement

Why they’re here: Not that you’d want to keep everyone from a 13-19 team, but losing your top seven players is never ideal. That made adding two top 100 transfers — which somehow ties for the second-most in the ACC — necessary.

Stojakovic is the biggest name here, given his bloodline and high school pedigree, but he was hit-or-miss as a freshman, making just 32.7 percent of his 3s. Petraitis is just as interesting, though, having played largely as a small-ball center despite being only 6-foot-7 and 210 pounds. He’s a creative passer, and we can already picture him finding All-Summit forward B.J. Omot (North Dakota) on backdoor cuts. The overall talent level isn’t at an ACC level, but Mark Madsen is a smart coach. We doubt Cal just rolls over.

go-deeper

GO DEEPER

Peach Jam intel: Cam Boozer or AJ Dybantsa? Plus 10 more standouts

15. Virginia Tech

Biggest losses: Sean Pedulla (16.4 ppg, 4.6 apg, 4.3 rpg); Hunter Cattoor (13.5 ppg); Lynn Kidd (13.2 ppg, 6.5 rpg); Tyler Nickel (8.8 ppg); MJ Collins (7.4 ppg); Robbie Beran (5.6 ppg); Mekhi Long (3.7 ppg, 4.9 rpg)

Returning rotation players: Mylyjael Poteat (6.4 ppg)

Advertisement

Top 100 freshmen added: No. 80 Ryan Jones Jr.

Top 100 transfers added: None

Why they’re here: It was not a fun offseason for Virginia Tech. The Hokies lost seven of their top eight players — including all five starters and their sixth man — from a 19-15 squad that could’ve been competitive had it stayed together. VT has one player with over 2,000 career minutes, Hysier Miller (Temple), and while he’s a capable pick-and-roll guard, his inefficiency will be something Mike Young has to manage. Otherwise, it’s a lot of young lottery tickets for Young, who must hope for one or two hits. Jaden Schutt (Duke) could be a sneaky name to watch, filling the off-ball shooting role long occupied by Cattoor, but Young will have to get creative offensively for this team to remain competitive.

16. Boston College

Biggest losses: Quinten Post (17 ppg, 8.1 rpg); Claudell Harris Jr. (13.7 ppg); Jaeden Zackery (11.3 ppg, 4.2 apg); Devin McGlockton (10.2 ppg, 6.3 rpg); Mason Madsen (8.1 ppg)

Returning rotation players: Donald Hand Jr. (5 ppg); Chas Kelley III (3.7 ppg)

Advertisement

Top 100 freshmen added: None

Top 100 transfers added: None

Why they’re here: Earl Grant steadily built BC into a 20-win team last season, earning the program’s best KenPom finish since 2011, only for his top six players to leave, setting the Eagles back to square one. With no incoming top 100 freshmen or transfers, Grant had to piece together a roster that’s hard to be too excited about. Dion Brown (UMBC) is an intriguing young pickup who Grant should largely give the keys to, and Chad Venning (St. Bonaventure) has the size to bang with ACC bigs, but that isn’t enough to continue the momentum Grant was building.

17. Stanford

Biggest losses: Brandon Angel (13 ppg, 4.7 rpg); Spencer Jones (11.7 ppg, 4.1 rpg); Kanaan Carlyle (11.5 ppg); Michael Jones (10.8 ppg); Andrej Stojakovic (7.8 ppg); Jared Bynum (6.9 ppg, 5.2 apg)

Returning rotation players: Maxime Raynaud (15.5 ppg, 9.6 rpg); Benny Gealer (4.2 ppg)

Advertisement

Top 100 freshmen added: None

Top 100 transfers added: None

Why they’re here: Getting Raynaud, the Pac-12’s Most Improved Player, back was imperative for new coach Kyle Smith. Raynaud is the only player on the roster with more than 1,400 career minutes, and one of only two with more than 800, joining Chisom Okpara (Harvard). Stanford’s young squad also will probably struggle to shoot it; the Cardinal are the only ACC team without a single player who has made at least 50 career 3-pointers. Unsurprisingly, Stanford as a team also has the second-fewest career made 3s, with little help on the way. Rebuilds have to start somewhere, and Smith has flipped a program before, but it’s going to take time.

18. Florida State

Biggest losses: Darin Green Jr. (11.3 ppg); Primo Spears (10.6 ppg); Cameron Corhen (9.4 ppg); Baba Miller (7.6 ppg, 4.9 rpg); Jalen Warley (7.5 ppg); Cam’Ron Fletcher (6.7 ppg, 5 rpg)

Returning rotation players: Jamir Watkins (15.6 ppg, 6 rpg); Chandler Jackson (4.9 ppg); Taylor Bol Bowen (3.1 ppg)

Advertisement

Top 100 freshmen added: No. 84 Alier Maluk

Top 100 transfers added: None

Why they’re here: Two lost seasons in a row for FSU, and a third seems almost inevitable. Leonard Hamilton lost six of his top eight players this offseason, and their transfer portal replacements aren’t the same caliber. Watkins is a tremendous player, but there may not be anyone in the ACC who has to do more for his team next season than he will. Not only is Watkins FSU’s only player with over 2,000 career minutes, but he’s also the only of the Seminoles with at least 50 made 3s — which is a large part of why Hamilton’s team is last in the ACC in career 3s. Hamilton is a great coach, one of the most underappreciated in the sport, but it’ll take his best coaching job to get this version of FSU to even the middle of the league standings.

(Photo of Tyrese Proctor: Lance King / Getty Images)

Advertisement

Sports

Tennessee has teetered on irrelevancy. Can an outsider return the Lady Vols to the summit?

Published

on

Tennessee has teetered on irrelevancy. Can an outsider return the Lady Vols to the summit?

KNOXVILLE, Tenn. — In October, before Kim Caldwell had coached a game for Tennessee, she sat on an orange couch in her office and tried to get comfortable.

This was both a physical and philosophical challenge for the first-year Lady Volunteers coach at the time. At five months pregnant with her first child, there were certain realities about what “comfortable” might look like moving forward for her, and she missed the caffeine that she had given up months earlier (especially at this point in the year when team prep could seem never-ending).

But there was a deeper question: How does Caldwell — who had coached just 33 Division I basketball games — get comfortable in a position once held by one of the most important people in women’s basketball? And not just that, but how does she proceed when the program had fallen from its previous heights to a middling territory, which in Lady Vols-speak, is as bad as irrelevance? As someone who had coached against just three power conference opponents, how would she come up with the answers to get this program back to the standard that Pat Summitt set?

Caldwell, 36, grew up when Tennessee and UConn ruled women’s college basketball. Summitt and Geno Auriemma — their intensity and their rivalry — broke through the noise to make those epic matchups part of the mainstream sporting culture.

“It made people talk about women’s sports. It made people talk about women’s basketball,” Caldwell said. “It was such an incredible time.”

Advertisement

At her AAU practices in West Virginia, Caldwell’s teams were split up not by Team A versus Team B but by the Lady Vols versus the Huskies. At a tournament as a high school player, she looked into the stands and saw Summitt and Auriemma sitting next to one another evaluating recruits and later, walking past Summitt in the hallway.

She never thought — even as recently as a year ago — that she would be coaching against Auriemma in that rivalry game, or throwing on an orange pullover and walking into tournaments to recruit just like Summitt. Last summer, as she prepared for one such tournament in Chicago, she had to give herself a pep talk before walking into the gym — “Here we go. You’ve got bright orange on. Hold your head up high. Get in there,” she told herself — as she wondered if any players would react to her the way she once had to Summit.

Along with UConn and Stanford, Tennessee is tied to a singular coach like almost no other program in women’s college basketball — or college sports. So even on the days when she doesn’t drive past the nine-foot statue of Summitt outside Thompson-Boling Arena on her way to Tennessee staff offices, she still walks by a glass display of the eight national championship trophies that Summitt won. “The Summitt” is painted in script on the floor where Caldwell now coaches her home games. And then there’s the Tennessee orange. A color that Summitt made iconic.

In her book, Summitt wrote, “I remember every player — every single one — who wore the Tennessee orange, a shade that our rivals hate, a bold, aggravating color. … But to us, the color is a flag of pride, because it identifies us as Lady Vols and therefore as women of an unmistakable type. Fighters.”

Since Summitt retired in 2012, Tennessee has been fighting. First, to remain at the top, where Summitt had led the program. And then, to retain relevance. Both endeavors were mostly failures, though the program retained some prestige simply because of its history.

Now Caldwell, who had one season of coaching Division I basketball under her belt when she took the job in April, holds the reins to one of the sport’s most important programs.

“There’s an enormous weight that comes with it, and I knew that going into it. You talk about the history, what Pat Summitt did for sports in general, what she did for the state of Tennessee, what she did for basketball,” Caldwell said. “Where basketball is now. … I don’t know that we would be here without her.”

But over the last few seasons, as women’s basketball has grown more and more popular, Tennessee has been strangely missing from the fold. As the game moves forward, Tennessee hopes that its most recent (unexpected) hire means the Lady Vols don’t miss the next chapter, too.

Advertisement

The surprise around the women’s basketball world was palpable last April when Tennessee fired Kellie Harper. Many assumed she would get at least another season to try and turn around the program.

But any surprise around Harper’s firing paled when compared to the reaction when Tennessee announced its new head coach less than a week later: a swift “who?”

Caldwell had just finished her first season at Marshall. Though she had led the mid-major to the NCAA Tournament for the first time since 1997 (and just the second time in program history), it lost to four-seed Virginia Tech by 43. Before Marshall, Caldwell had spent seven seasons as the head coach at her alma mater, Division II Glenville State University in West Virginia.

The minimal Division I and power conference experience was obvious, but it was just as glaring that she had no ties to Summitt or even the state of Tennessee. The program stayed within the Summitt tree after she retired, hiring Tennessee native Holly Warlick, a longtime assistant and former player under Summitt, and then, in 2019, turned to Harper, a Tennessee native, Summitt protégé and beloved alum. Neither returned the program to its elite perch, failing to reach the Final Four for more than a decade.

Recruits had never witnessed Tennessee achieve the way the program historically had, though their parents remembered. Getting this hire right was important; every passing day seemingly moved the program further from contention.

Advertisement

Given that Harper was fired with four years left on her contract and she had received an extension from Tennessee athletic director Danny White just a year earlier, most in the industry assumed such a drastic move indicated that White planned to swing for the fences. Harper earned $1.1 million a year — making her the 12th highest-paid coach in women’s college hoops — so if the Lady Vols upped that salary even a bit, they could likely lure a high-profile coach to Knoxville. Tennessee alum and Duke coach Kara Lawson and Las Vegas Aces coach Becky Hammon, who had just won two WNBA titles, were considered people White should pursue. USC coach Lindsay Gottlieb was among the prominent names on media coaching lists. A report connected Tennessee’s search firm to Indiana coach Teri Moren.

The names being floated were esteemed within women’s basketball. Lawson, the only UT alum currently coaching at a high level, was the only Summitt connection in the group.

From Knoxville, White felt a pull away from his predecessors, who had hired from the Summitt tree.

“We had already gone through those chapters twice,” he said. “If there was any pressure at all, it was probably more so to go outside (the tree) and try something different. I don’t know if that was real or something I invented myself, but I certainly didn’t feel pressure to stay inside of coach Summitt’s tree.”

In administrative circles, White’s choice was unexpected, but his methods weren’t surprising.

Advertisement

As the Buffalo AD, he hired men’s basketball coach Nate Oats, who had only two years of college experience as an assistant and had only been a head coach of a high school boy’s basketball team. (Alabama hired Oats five seasons later.) White also hired Lance Leipold as Buffalo’s football coach despite Leipold’s previous seven seasons off everyone’s radar at a Division III school. (Kansas hired him five years later.) At UCF in 2018, White hired Josh Heupel. Many assumed Heupel’s career had dead-ended three years earlier and were surprised he was landing a big job. After three bowl game appearances with UCF, White brought Heupel to Tennessee, which is in the College Football Playoff this season as the No. 7 seed.

“He’s kind of got a Midas touch,” Leipold told The Athletic in 2022.

Hiring for the Tennessee women’s job is its own beast. His conversations with Caldwell reminded him of talking to Heupel. He liked that her system was different and exciting, utilizing a full-court pressing defense that forced turnovers, an offense that took early 3s and hockey-style substitutions that kept players’ legs fresh throughout the games. Her sample size at Marshall was small, but the program had gone from .500 in conference play to winning the league title in her first year.

“I think more frequently in different sports, at the highest level, people are seeing,” White said, “that coaching is coaching.”

The decision made one thing clear: Hiring Caldwell could make White look prescient — and more importantly, the move could return Tennessee to the top of women’s basketball — if it works out. If it doesn’t, it likely will be considered an obvious and avoidable misstep in caretaking the program.

Advertisement

For the first time in a long time, more eyes and scrutiny are on Tennessee. Not because of high expectations, but because everyone wants to know: Is Caldwell the answer to the post-Summitt conundrum?


Kim Caldwell is the first coach hired since Pat Summitt’s retirement to not be from her coaching tree. (Bryan Lynn / Icon Sportswire via Getty Images)

When Caldwell’s agent, Brian Stanchak, called her on April 1 to tell her Tennessee’s search firm was gauging her interest, Caldwell wondered if it was an April Fool’s Day joke.

“Honestly. I was thinking, ‘Anyone but me. There’s got to be people that have more experience under their belt or an assistant,’” Caldwell said. “I mean, it’s been one year (in Division I).”

Caldwell took a call with Tennessee mostly for the experience of interviewing for a prominent position. She was genuinely happy at Marshall. She and her husband, Justin, had just bought their dream house — a four-bedroom custom home on a spacious lot with an apartment above the garage for her mom.

Other mid-major and power conference jobs had come up during her head coaching career, and her response was always the same: “I love winning and I love my players. I don’t love everything else that comes with coaching, right?” she said. “The lower level you are, the more basketball you usually get to do. That’s as honest, as transparent as I can be about it.”

Advertisement

But the Tennessee job was different.

With a tornado warning in West Virginia hitting right before her scheduled interview slot, she huddled in a closet, rather than postponing because of the inclement weather. She sweated through the interview, not because she was nervous but because the closet was so stuffy. When it ended, she thanked Tennessee for the conversation and assumed that would be the end of it.

But when White wanted her to visit Knoxville, it began to sink in that she actually had a shot.

“Do I stay here because I love it and I’m happy, or do I take the best job that I’m ever going to get offered right now?” Caldwell said. “Because I can work for 80 more years, and I will never get offered a job of this magnitude again.”

Caldwell was surprised at how comfortable she felt in Knoxville, and leaned toward a yes if an offer came.

Advertisement

But there were still detractors. Her mom asked why she would leave a state where she was beloved to coach somewhere she wouldn’t be. ”They’re gonna be like: Who is this? Why is she now our coach?” Caldwell said her mom cautioned.

She told her mom the same thing she had told her players: Don’t leave any regrets on the floor.

So when White called, she accepted. But she also knew the pressures that would come at Tennessee. An antsy fan base, a motivated athletic department, the women’s basketball world wondering how she could solve a puzzle that had proven impossible for other Division II and mid-major coaches.

“I think you just have to bet on yourself and say, ‘Hey, you’re gonna be uncomfortable for a while, but I was just uncomfortable for six months. Yes, I can be uncomfortable again,’” Caldwell said. “You bet on your own success.”

Advertisement

Every season, Caldwell keeps a notebook on her team, what’s going right and wrong, and, most importantly, how she’s feeling. Even during a season when the pressure is so different and the stage is so much bigger, she finds consistent trends in what she writes and feels from year to year.

“I’m miserable,” she said with a laugh in mid-December. “So I’m right on track.”

This is how it goes for Caldwell’s system: In November and most of December, she’s miserable. She never wants to talk basketball at Thanksgiving. By Christmas? She might be ready to talk hoops as things usually start coming together.

With the Lady Vols sitting at 8-0, a few of the early questions have been answered. Tennessee picked up significant wins over Florida State and Iowa earlier this month, but Caldwell knows SEC play will be different.

Home attendance is the highest in Knoxville since the 2015-16 season, and recruiting took off immediately with Caldwell. She’s already picked up two top-25 players in the 2025 class, matching a pace close to Summitt’s in her final five years. By comparison, Warlick signed 10 in seven seasons, and Harper signed just one in her five classes from 2020-24.

Advertisement

“I was pretty shocked at first. And then I kind of told myself, ‘Why not?’ It’s not like the program was a national powerhouse,” said ESPN analyst Andraya Carter, a member of Summitt’s final recruiting class at Tennessee. “I had a lot of reservations, but I started seeing some of the (recruits) she was getting. I just was like, ‘Let’s go.’ The system that she’s running is literally one where you can’t hesitate, so for me, as an alum, not an analyst, I’m not going to hesitate either. … Let’s see what she’s got.”

Caldwell’s Lady Vols lead the nation with 98 points per game and turn over opponents a nationally best 30 times a game. Last season, Marshall finished in the top five nationally in both categories — so that part feels pretty familiar.

But Caldwell’s still getting used to some differences. At Marshall, she had three assistants, one graduate assistant and two managers. At Tennessee, she has a staff of 13 and nine managers. She never had a video coordinator before coming to Knoxville; now practice and game footage are ready and clipped for her nearly by the time practice is over. She said she learned more during her first three weeks in Knoxville than an entire season at Marshall.

With SEC play around the corner, the toughest tests are still ahead of the Lady Vols, but with each win, the argument grows that White made the right move and Caldwell could be the unexpected answer at Tennessee. Will that be enough to bring the program back to its previous heights? Caldwell’s confident enough to bet on herself and her team.

Advertisement

“You don’t turn it down,” Caldwell said. “And then you spend every day trying to make sure that they realize they didn’t make a mistake.”

(Illustration: Meech Robinson / The Athletic; Photos: Bryan Lynn / Icon Sportswire, Damian Strohmeyer / Sports Illustrated via Getty Images, Donald Page / Getty Images)

Continue Reading

Sports

Brittany Mahomes silences Taylor Swift feud speculation after attending Eras Tour-themed party: 'My people'

Published

on

Brittany Mahomes silences Taylor Swift feud speculation after attending Eras Tour-themed party: 'My people'

Brittany Mahomes and Taylor Swift have notably not spent time together at as many Kansas City Chiefs games this season as last year.

The two are significant others of the top stars on the team in Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, respectively.

The apparent separation came as the two appeared to support different candidates in this year’s presidential election. Mahomes liked a post from Donald Trump on Instagram and wrote several messages regarding her critics, while Swift openly endorsed Kamala Harris.

Taylor Swift, Brittany Mahomes and Ashley Avignone react during the first half between the New England Patriots and the Kansas City Chiefs Dec. 17, 2023, in Foxborough, Mass.  (AP Photo/Michael Dwyer)

Advertisement

But the two appear to be all good.

According to multiple outlets, Patrick and Brittany recently attended an Eras Tour-themed party hosted by Swift, and the quarterback rocked a tuxedo similar to the one Kelce wore while on stage at a show. Patrick’s wife wore a sparkly silver dress.

Brittany posted several photos of the event, some of which included Swift, captioning the post, “My people” with a heart emoji.

Patrick, Brittany, Kelce and Swift attended the men’s U.S. Open final after the Chiefs’ first game of the season.

Taylor Swift claps during Kansas City Chiefs game with Brittany Mahomes

Swift and Mahomes became fast friends watching football in luxury boxes around the country. (David Eulitt)

ESPN STAR FIRES BACK AT AARON RODGERS AFTER JETS QB CALLS ON CRITICS TO SHARE ‘VAX STATUS’

Advertisement

And Swift stood or sat alongside Brittany in the same suite for nearly every Chiefs game last year. However, this year, Swift was only seen with Mahomes twice at games — Oct. 7 against the Saints and Nov. 4 against the Buccaneers. 

The duo made headlines at the Chiefs’ first game against the Ravens when they sat in separate suites to open the season. The two sat separately after Brittany incited backlash for publicly liking a post by Trump on Instagram. Swift fan groups on social media were partially responsible for circulating screenshots of Brittany’s like of Trump’s post. 

Travis Kelce and Patrick Mahomes' ladies Taylor Swift and Brittany Mahomes celebrate Chiefs win against New York Jets

Taylor Swift and Brittany Mahomes (Getty Images)

Trump even weighed in on the controversy after Swift endorsed Kamala Harris for president Sept. 10. In an interview on “Fox & Friends” the next day, Trump said he liked Brittany “much better” than Swift. 

Fox News’ Jackson Thompson contributed to this report.

Advertisement

Follow Fox News Digital’s sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.

Continue Reading

Sports

It cost $1.7 million to have the LAPD work — and wear Dodgers caps — at World Series parade

Published

on

It cost .7 million to have the LAPD work — and wear Dodgers caps — at World Series parade

The response was much like that of a father when handed the bill for his daughter’s wedding reception. Joy trumps outrage every time.

So, when the city of Los Angeles informed the Dodgers that its police and fire department services for the Nov. 1 parade to celebrate the World Series championship totaled $2,028,805.19, the team was only too happy to cut the check.

The parade began at City Hall, meandered to the Walt Disney Concert Hall and ended at Fifth and Flower streets, wheeling through downtown on open-top double-decker buses with an estimated 250,000 fans lining the streets. Then came a boisterous rally in front of 42,000 fans at Dodger Stadium.

It was the parade the Dodgers couldn’t stage after winning the 2020 World Series during the COVID-19 shutdown. It was their first parade, in fact, since winning the World Series in 1988.

Advertisement

“I’m telling you, the game is about the players and the fans,” manager Dave Roberts told The Times. “And in 2020 we just didn’t have that opportunity. … The city needed this parade.”

State law requires applicants — in this case, the Dodgers — requesting a permit to conduct a “special event” to pay “the city’s actual cost of providing the required number of police and other city employees necessary to ensure the safety of both the participants and the community.”

Therefore, it was the Dodgers — and not taxpayers — who will pay the Los Angeles Police Department $1,738,621.19 and the L.A. Fire Department $290,184 for making sure the celebration was conducted in a safe, orderly manner.

Good thing, given the dire financial straits the city of L.A. finds itself in. City departments went at least $215 million over budget from the beginning of the fiscal year July 1 through Oct. 31, according to an analysis. Expensive legal settlements and court judgments resulting from lawsuits against the city have been especially costly.

“We have been working closely with the city for some time and will be finalizing the total reimbursement soon,” the Dodgers said in a statement to The Times. “It was a great event for the city, Dodger fans and our team, and we’re grateful for the joint support of the Dodgers provided by the city as a whole, especially the Mayor, the City Council, the LAPD, the LAFD and the [Department of Transportation].”

Advertisement

According to a city expenditure report, nearly all the money spent by the LAPD on the parade went to pay officers by the hour, from a communications intern to numerous officers to a deputy chief, although $415,464 was charged for “fringe benefits” listed under “indirect costs.” Maybe the blue Dodgers caps several of the officers wore fell into that category.

The LAPD bill broke down the total number of man and woman hours: 8,823.

A few days earlier when the Dodgers defeated the New York Yankees in Game 5 to take the World Series title, unruly fans set fire to an L.A. Metro bus and commandeered street intersections for burnouts and street racing. More than 70 people were arrested for vandalism, assault on a police officer and failure to disperse.

No such behavior marred the parade. The only arrest reported was of a man who threw a bottle at officers. A group of rowdy fans hanging around afterward were ushered from the parade route by officers in tactical gear marching in formation. Otherwise, it was a cheerful outpouring of appreciation for the Dodgers.

All to be paid for by the Dodgers.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending