Connect with us

Sports

NBA free agency Day 1: Grading Paul George's Sixers move and other deals

Published

on

NBA free agency Day 1: Grading Paul George's Sixers move and other deals

Follow live free-agency news and analysis from our entire NBA staff, and sign up for The Bounce to get basketball content delivered straight to your inbox.


Day 1 of NBA free agency is in the books, and it was … kind of underwhelming? We didn’t see the big shifts in the NBA landscape we normally expect, and we didn’t see the flurry of deals come pouring out as soon as everybody was officially open for business. We saw the salary cap come in a little under the projected total. Then we saw some very conservative actions by teams when spending would normally look cartoonish. What does that all mean for this summer, and what did happen through Day 1?

We’ve got the big moves, the expected re-signs, head-scratchers, signings of great value, things we’re on the fence about and a lot more below. We’ll get through all of them from Day 1 with grades for some and emojis for others.

The Pulse Newsletter

Free, daily sports updates direct to your inbox. Sign up

Advertisement

Free, daily sports updates direct to your inbox. Sign up

BuyBuy The Pulse Newsletter


Did the NBA ruin free agency?

We’re used to the clock striking the start of free agency and deals flooding the social media timelines like customers searching for a $5 4K television, rushing into a Best Buy the morning after Thanksgiving. This year? The free-agency zone went live at 6 p.m. ET and we … got … Luke Kornet returning to the Celtics and Kevin Love returning to the Heat on small deals? We waited a bit longer and found out Andre Drummond is signing a deal to join Philadelphia, which would’ve been big news a decade ago. Eventually we got to Chris Paul joining a new team, James Harden returning to Los Angeles and Paul George ending his tenure with the Clippers. But this is not the flurry of moves we normally expect.

It’s unreasonable to assume every start of free agency is going to be the start of the 2016 offseason when the cap spike happened with a new TV deal and we saw Kent Bazemore, Timofey Mozgov, Luol Deng, Bismack Biyombo and guys like Evan Turner and Allen Crabbe get big money instantly. Normally, this stuff is sewn up, and we’re expecting a cavalcade of new deals to be announced. The NBA can pretend it doesn’t want the transaction to be the big carrying point of league interest to casual and diehard fans, but the focus on that through social media and television segments turned the NBA into a 12-month league.

This new collective bargaining agreement, however, found itself in the way of that very excitement when free agency opened up this year. Luxury taxes! First aprons! Dreaded second aprons! Legalese and cap jargon have become guillotines hanging over the necks of fun and drama. Eventually, the agents will find a way to take advantage of certain rules for their clients. Until then, we’re left with wet fireworks we’re hoping will provide big bangs and pretty colors.

Since the announcement of the new CBA details, I and many others have talked about what a mistake this deal is for teams and the league overall. The owners have often overreacted to something they didn’t like, whether it’s super teams, Kevin Durant going to a 73-win Warriors team or the idea of long-term deals for players when those players are no longer tradable halfway through the deal.

They overreact, for some reason the players’ union agrees (probably because they’re still getting the majority of the revenue pie) and then we see the process of keeping a team together or making a good team better all the more difficult. We can pretend it’s about parity, but I think it’s about pouting from the owners. We still have plenty of things that can happen, which will be fun. But the NBA is going to need trades, not free-agency signings, to create the shift in the NBA landscape. Thanks for ruining the start of the summer.

Advertisement


The Paul George situation

Along those same lines, we’re seeing this exact thing show up as a reason for what happened with the Clippers and Paul George. After it was reported that George was likely to leave the Clippers and sign with a new team, the Clippers released a statement on the matter. I do not remember a franchise ever doing this about a player they were about to lose in free agency.

I remember Dan Gilbert throwing a comic sans fit after LeBron James left for Miami. I remember the Knicks releasing a statement about how pleased they were with their signings after missing out on Kevin Durant and Kyrie Irving. But I don’t remember a team citing breakdowns in negotiations with a player and referencing the CBA as an obstacle to getting something done. Check out this tweet from Mike Vorkunov, properly interpreting exactly that.

That’s pretty significant! You don’t have to care about the Clippers to care about this exact situation, but it should be noteworthy that these types of scenarios are going to happen more and more in the current CBA, which runs through the 2029-2030 season. Granted, there was a very simple fix for the Clippers if they wanted to keep George on their roster: Give him the four-year max contract he was seeking. Instead, they offered up three years to keep it in the same time frame as the three-year extension they reached with Kawhi Leonard earlier this year. George wanted the longer deal, which would have paid him until he turned 38. Instead, the Clippers lost George for nothing — right before they enter their new arena.

Advertisement

The Sixers are now more than happy to benefit as they try to put a supporting cast around Joel Embiid to help him advance past the second round of the playoffs for once. Regardless, the PG debacle has cratered a lot of what the Clippers were hoping to do in their new building. And this won’t be the last time a franchise cites this CBA for why its team is falling apart.


Big moves through Day 1

Paul George agrees to sign with the 76ers on a four-year, $212 million deal

The Sixers cleared the cap space and created the roster flexibility to put another star next to Embiid and Tyrese Maxey. Bringing George in after the season he had becomes a major feather in the cap of Daryl Morey’s plan. George will come to Philadelphia and fill in the gaps. When Embiid can’t play, he’ll take a step up the ladder of their attack and do a lot more. He’ll provide 3-point shooting, scoring, great defense and playmaking. He’s exactly the type of guy they need next to both Maxey and Embiid. We’ll just have to wait to see if this produces a different result for the 76ers in the playoffs.

Grade: A

Kentavious Caldwell-Pope agrees to sign with the Magic on a three-year, $66 million deal

Caldwell-Pope leaving Denver puts the Nuggets in a bad spot. They can’t just replace Caldwell-Pope and the money they would have given him, and they have even more pressure for the young guys on their roster to step up into the hole this creates in the starting lineup.

Second, what a coup for the Magic. This is a team that built its identity on defense with a young core that exceeded expectations. Their problem was they couldn’t throw the ball into the Epcot Center last season. Caldwell-Pope keeps the defensive identity going while also providing reliable shooting. We also could see him do a little bit more as a scorer. Fantastic contract for him, and the Magic.

Advertisement

Grade: A

James Harden agrees to re-sign with the Clippers on a two-year, $70 million deal

George’s departure makes this signing even more important for the Clippers. They’re getting Harden on a discount for essentially a year, maybe two if he picks up the player option for the 2025-26 season. With George gone and Leonard needing to be brought along carefully so he will hopefully be healthy in any kind of postseason run, Harden’s role needs to look more like what we saw out of him in Houston. I’m not sure if that’s possible, because that’s a big shock to the system for him getting back to that caliber of player and to what the Clippers would want to do offensively in the first place. Regardless of what Harden is still capable of doing on offense, the Clippers need him to be better this season. But it’s a great discount and deal for the Clippers to get him back at this rate.

Grade: A


Chris Paul will bring veteran leadership to the Spurs. (D. Ross Cameron / USA Today)

Chris Paul agrees to sign one-year, $11 million deal with the Spurs

Bringing in Paul to whip things into shape immediately matures this young Spurs core, however much of it will remain going into next season. In almost every stop of his career, Paul has immediately raised a team’s floor. He will teach the Spurs all the things they don’t know, and he’ll have this team operating at a more professional level on the court.

There are two concerns. He’s 39 and has missed 64 games over his last three seasons with various injuries. Considering it’s just a one-year deal, it lessens the concern; but it’s tough to believe he’ll be healthy all season. My other concern is he wants to still prove he’s an elite guard in the NBA. The Spurs just need him to be the mentor to these young guys and not try to have an Uncle Rico moment to prove he’s still got it. Get Victor Wembanyama the ball, knock down shots and teach. That’s all Paul needs to do for this to be a great success.

Advertisement

Grade: B+

Derrick Jones Jr. agrees to sign three-year, $30 million deal with the Clippers

This is potentially a big move for the Clippers to help replace the loss of George. Jones had a fantastic season with the Mavericks, helping them reach the NBA Finals. His defense can be really good. His athleticism is tough to match. But he’s not the reliable shooter teams need him to be. It’s improved over the years, but you’re rarely expecting him to outright knock down that corner 3-ball. Replacing George will be a group effort with Harden, Norm Powell, Terance Mann and Jones all picking up the slack. If Jones can shoot like we saw flashes of in his time with Dallas, this becomes a brilliant signing. Good pivot by the Clippers either way.

Grade: B


Expected re-signs through Day 1

Pascal Siakam agrees to re-sign with the Pacers on a four-year, $189.5 million deal

The Pacers made a risk last season when they traded for Siakam, considering he could walk this summer. No drama needed with Siakam agreeing to re-sign with the Pacers before we even hit free agency. Siakam had a really good run for them in the postseason as they made the conference finals and provides a very solid second option alongside Tyrese Haliburton, as long as the star guard is healthy. The end of this deal could potentially be rough when Siakam is 34, but this was the cost of doing business. Good enough contract to keep him.

Grade: B+

Advertisement

Malik Monk agrees to re-sign with the Kings on a four-year, $79 million deal

This is a big coup for the Kings, as there were plenty of concerns the CBA limitations could lead to him signing elsewhere for more money. This was the most the Kings could re-sign him for, and he probably could have pursued somewhere in the $25 million annual range. But he likes it in Sacramento, he’s had great success there, and he still gets a healthy contract to give him roughly $20 million per season. Great move for the Kings.

Grade: A

OG Anunoby agrees to re-sign with the Knicks on a five-year, $212 million deal

That number scared a bunch of people after the Knicks traded five first-round picks for Mikal Bridges in the same week. Over $40 million per season for Anunoby is probably too much money. I would have guessed he was somewhere in the $30 million to $35 million range, so it’s probably a bit of an overpay for someone who has struggled to remain healthy. However, we saw the impact of Anunoby on the court for the Knicks. If he doesn’t get hurt in the playoffs, the Knicks make the conference finals, and the team is even better now. The Knicks had to re-sign him with what they gave up for him.

Grade: A-

Immanuel Quickley agrees to re-sign with the Raptors on a five-year, $175 million deal

I don’t love this contract for Quickley because I’m not certain he’s shown himself to be a definite franchise point guard. That’s what this kind of money over five years makes him for the Raptors. But you’re paying him for what you think he’ll be and not what he has been so far. I don’t think it’s unreasonable to think Quickley can become a franchise point guard on a good team (which the Raptors are not yet), but I don’t think it’s a given either. Still, he’s a good player, and that’s just the cost of doing business.

Advertisement

Grade: B

Royce O’Neale agrees to re-sign with the Suns on a four-year, $44 million deal

Keeping O’Neale on a very team-friendly, below-midlevel exception deal is a huge win for the Suns. They need 3-and-D role players, and even though O’Neale struggled in their brief playoff cup of coffee as a team, he’s the right guy to have with this group for as long as it sticks together. The Suns struggled to fill out a rotation and O’Neale can do that competently. If they decide to blow up the team, he’s extremely easy to move with this deal, and by the end of it, he’ll be a great value.

Grade: A

Obi Toppin agrees to re-sign with the Pacers on a four-year, $60 million deal

This feels like a lot of money for Toppin, even though he had a good season with the Pacers. The hope is that he can continue to build his relationship on the court with Haliburton, be a great push-ahead option for the Pacers and put a lot of pressure on defenses. His jumper looked pretty good this past season too. At some point, they’ll need him to be better defensively, but they need that from everybody.

Grade: B

Advertisement

Patrick Williams agrees to re-sign with the Bulls on a five-year, $90 million deal

The idea of Williams has been a lot better than the reality of him. The Bulls are banking on the idea that the reality will come through, he’ll stay healthy, and he’ll become a very productive 3-and-D wing. Maybe even something more than that? He’s been a good 3-point shooter but on low volume. He’s been a good defender, but not a great one. He’s someone the Bulls need to be a lot better than he is, especially if they’re eventually going to retool this roster around the little youth they have. It won’t be difficult for Williams to justify this contract, but it doesn’t feel like a certainty either.

Grade: B


On-the-fence deals through Day 1

Kevin Porter Jr. agrees to a two-year with the Clippers

Porter has a pretty troubled past, and he’s hoping to prove himself moving forward. The Clippers are banking on the on-court talent coming through for him and giving them a big boost in the void George left. This deal looks a lot better, even a cheap deal, with the signing of Jones. I would guess Porter is more of a luxury than a necessity on the court for them.

Grade: C-

Andre Drummond agrees to sign with the 76ers on a two-year, $10 million deal

Drummond still rebounds like a madman. He’s one of the best in the NBA at it. He had a pretty good season for Chicago, and the Sixers will need him to play enough to keep Embiid healthy and fresh for the postseason. Can Drummond provide enough on the court to make the Sixers comfortable to play Embiid less in the regular season? Without sacrificing wins?

Advertisement

Grade: B

Eric Gordon agrees to deal with the 76ers

It’s a minimum deal, so I do like the value play for the Sixers in theory. We just need to know if the Sixers are getting the happy, productive version of Gordon or if they’re getting a disgruntled version who won’t be content with his role. Morey is going with someone he trusts and knows from their time together in Houston. If Gordon can still score off the bench, it’ll work. If he doesn’t have it anymore, maybe they should’ve gone after younger, more versatile minimum plays.

Grade: B-


Great values through Day 1

Naji Marshall agrees to three-year, $27 million deal with the Mavericks

Instead of waiting on what Jones might do, the Mavericks pivoted to Naji Marshall. He didn’t get a lot of time on the court with New Orleans, but he did show improvement in his 3-point shooting this past season. That should look a lot better with Luka Dončić delivering him the ball. He might be a better, more trustworthy player than Jones, and it’s a slightly cheaper deal than Jones got with the Clippers.

Grade: A-

Advertisement

Mason Plumlee agrees to one-year deal with the Suns

Plumlee should be an upgrade over Drew Eubanks, who was fine for Phoenix. You can do more with Plumlee on both ends of the court, in theory. And to get this depth on a one-year deal should prove to be savvy for the Suns. We just don’t know if the rest of the roster is going to fill out in a way where teams fear the Suns next season.

Grade: B+

Kelly Oubre Jr. agrees to resign with the 76ers on two-year, $16.3 million deal

I’ve never been the biggest Oubre fan on the court, but the Sixers need guys in the rotation who can occasionally get hot and compete on defense. Oubre does that, and they have to hope the 3-point shot will hit an above-league-average rate (typically around 35-36 percent). Oubre’s deal has a player option for the second season, so he either outplays this deal and hits free agency next summer or he is easy to move next summer if he underperforms and picks up the option.

Grade: B+


Head scratchers of the day

Max Christie agrees to re-sign with the Lakers on a four-year, $32 million deal

It’s not bad money, and I do think Christie has value for the Lakers at some point. I’m just not sure if this is the time for that. I’m also a little surprised the Lakers felt the need to get this done so quickly, unless they were worried about him getting a bigger offer sheet they’d have to match. We won’t know just how good or egregious this deal will be until we know the rest of their moves this summer, but this didn’t feel like a Day 1 thing to get done.

Advertisement

Grade: C+


Jonas Valanciunas is heading to the Wizards in a curious move. (Alonzo Adams / USA Today)

Jonas Valanciunas agrees to sign with the Wizards on a three-year, $30 million deal

Valanciunas had a real case for the best big man on the market, and Day 1 he signs a three-year deal with arguably the worst team in the league under the midlevel exception value? The Wizards get a solid option, and maybe this is more of a trade option down the road for them when a team needs a big man. I just don’t see why Valanciunas would jump into this on Day 1, unless he’s a massive Smithsonian fan.

Grade: C


Trades of the day

Dallas Mavericks acquire Quentin Grimes
Detroit Pistons acquire Tim Hardaway Jr. and three second-round picks

Advertisement

The Mavericks made a salary-dump move that actually makes them better, and I don’t understand what’s in it for Detroit other than the second-round picks. Grimes will be a restricted free agent next summer, so maybe Detroit was hesitant to commit money to him in the future. But Grimes is a good two-way player who still has so much growth in front of his career. Hardaway is a good bench scorer who lost his spot in the Mavs’ rotation on their run to the finals. Hardaway makes nearly four times what Grimes does next season. And the Mavericks needed to unload salary, so why didn’t the Pistons demand even more compensation? Better compensation? Maybe the Pistons just love reunions in bringing THJ back to Michigan?

Grade: A for Mavs, C+ for Pistons


Quick-hitter small deals

Luke Kornet agrees to re-sign with the Celtics on one-year deal

They love him, and he’s on a one-year minimum again. This is an easy re-sign, even if it doesn’t yield much on the court.

Yay or nay?  🤝

Bol Bol agrees to re-sign with the Suns on one-year deal

The internet loves to pretend he’s the first version of Wemby, but the reality is he’s a one-year, minimum guy until he proves otherwise. He needs to carve out a real role this year.

Advertisement

Yay or nay?  🤝

Kevin Love agrees to re-sign with the Heat on two-year, $8 million deal

Good value to bring Love back to the Heat, although as the years go on, it needs to be in a more and more limited role.

Yay or nay? 👍

Neemias Queta agrees to re-sign with the Celtics on two-year deal

He barely played for the Celtics this season, but Boston keeps the championship core together here.

Yay or nay? 🤝

Advertisement

DeAndre Jordan agrees to re-sign with the Nuggets on one-year deal

He hasn’t done much in the NBA in the last three years, but he’s a cheap salary and the Nuggets seem to like him. They still need a guy to actually give Nikola Jokić a rest.

Yay or nay? 🤝


Names to keep an eye on

Big names still available: Klay Thompson, DeMar DeRozan, Miles Bridges, LeBron James

Restricted free agents still available: Isaac Okoro, Simone Fontecchio, Tyrese Maxey, Jose Alvarado, Precious Achiuwa

Veteran lead guards: Tyus Jones, Spencer Dinwiddie, Delon Wright, Monte Morris, Markelle Fultz, Kyle Lowry, Cameron Payne, Kris Dunn

Advertisement

Important veterans: Derrick Jones Jr, Justin Holiday, Gary Payton II, Jeff Green, Taurean Prince, Caleb Martin, Kyle Anderson, Alec Burks, Gary Harris, Nicolas Batum, Tobias Harris, De’Anthony Melton, Gary Trent Jr.

Young guys to take a chance on: James Wiseman, Jalen Smith, TyTy Washington, Isaiah Joe, KJ Martin, Dominick Barlow

Mentors: Wes Matthews, Taj Gibson, Patty Mills, Gordon Hayward, Joe Ingles, Robert Covington, Isaiah Thomas

Big men: Tristan Thompson, Daniel Theis, Christian Wood, Thomas Bryant, Isaiah Hartenstein, Bismack Biyombo, Mike Muscala, Moe Wagner, Goga Bitadze, Mo Bamba, Drew Eubanks, JaVale McGee, Richaun Holmes, Xavier Tillman

Forwards: Marcus Morris Sr, Markieff Morris, Haywood Highsmith, Jae Crowder, Danilo Gallinari, TJ Warren, Thad Young

Advertisement

Wings and shooters: Saddiq Bey, Lonnie Walker IV, Davis Bertans, Reggie Bullock, Doug McDermott, Luke Kennard, Yuta Watanabe, Malik Beasley, Patrick Beverley, Buddy Hield, Josh Okogie, Cedi Osman, Talen Horton-Tucker

Plumlees and Zellers: Marshall, Miles, Cody, Tyler, Luke

(Top photo of Paul George and James Harden: Harry How / Getty Images)

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Sports

The State of Punditry – part 2: How the world analyses football – and the U.S. lead the way

Published

on

The State of Punditry – part 2: How the world analyses football – and the U.S. lead the way

Football coverage is a divisive subject.

Some think the standard of punditry is great, others will tell you it needs some work and some will deride it as awful. The analysis of the analysis never ends.

This week, The Athletic is looking more closely at the state of the industry, starting with yesterday’s piece assessing what is demanded of pundits in the United Kingdom in 2024 and how people consume their work.

Today, we broaden the discussion to see how UK coverage stacks up against the rest of the world, including the proudest of all football nations Germany, Brazil and Spain, together with those pesky upstarts in the U.S..


In Europe, the landscape of punditry can be wildly different. Travel to Italy, Spain or Turkey, switch on a television and scan through the channels and you’ll almost certainly be able to find some football coverage, be it via a football talk show, replays of matches, or on the news.

Advertisement

This is the case in the UK, too, via Sky Sports’ network of channels, but we’re talking free-to-air here in countries where people are arguably far more obsessed with football than your average UK football diehard.

It borders on fanaticism in a place like Turkey and the at-times frantic coverage reflects that. One grim incident recently showcased how seriously football is taken, when pundit Serhat Akin was shot in the foot when leaving a TV studio.

The former Fenerbahce player had been covering the club’s match against Belgian side Union Saint-Gilloise from an Istanbul studio, after which he was approached and shot by a masked man.

Akin posted a picture of his bloodied foot on Instagram with the caption: “They shot my foot, our last word is Fenerbahce.”

Over in Germany things are a bit calmer.

In many ways the coverage is very similar to in the UK, only probably a bit better. Standard Bundesliga behaviour.

Advertisement

Why? Well, depending on your disposition, they don’t quite have as much forced melodrama that you tend to find with the Premier League.

The punditry industry is not quite as accessible for ex-players, so the notion of former pros that you’d get on, say, a certain national radio station in the UK where certain people will make certain comments to attract attention doesn’t really exist.

Presenters, again, unlike in the UK with Gary Lineker, Alex Scott, or, until recently, Jermaine Jenas, are media professionals rather than players. Pundits include Per Mertesacker and Christoph Kramer, the 2014 World Cup winner who has been an analyst for many years already despite being only 33 years old and still not officially retired (he left Borussia Mönchengladbach in the summer).


Germany coach Julian Nagelsmann speaks with Christoph Kramer (second right) and (right) Per Mertesacker (Tom Weller/picture alliance via Getty Images)

They have a tactics corner on Sky via Dutchman Erik Meijer, the one-time Liverpool striker who spent much of his career in Germany. In a recent interview with The Athletic, Meijer described his reaction to being asked to appear on German television: “The first question I had was, ‘There are 80 million Germans in this country so why do they need to employ a Dutchman? But they wanted a different voice — someone who would say that Bayern Munich were c**p when they were.”

Julia Simic, who used to play for the women’s national team, is also a regular, while pundits who cover the Premier League include former goalkeeper Rene Adler and ex-Croatia international and Fulham and West Ham striker Mladen Petric.

Advertisement

While Germans do like other sports, such as basketball, handball and tennis, football is the main draw and the coverage can be dense and fanatical, although it tends to be quite considered and mindful of weighty issues. The rise of vloggers and influencers we have seen in the UK hasn’t yet caught on.

Probably the most high profile figure is Wolff Fuss, inflection king extraordinaire. Search for him on TikTok and you’ll find 20 million matches. Fuss has the stage to himself because, in another difference to the UK, co-commentators are quite uncommon in Germany.

If Fuss is the main man, then Lothar Matthaus is the loudest. Not necessarily in volume, but in the decibel level of his opinions (and his outfits… Matthaus caught the eye at this summer’s European Championship with some striking gilets).


Lothar Matthaus (right), complete with gilet (Marcus Brandt/picture alliance via Getty Images)

Matthaus could probably be compared to Gary Neville or Jamie Carragher in that he gives forthright views on “his” club, which in this case would be Bayern Munich. Neville and Carragher constantly attract the attention of Manchester United and Liverpool managers with their views but Matthaus — and his partner-in-crime, Dietmar Hamann — tend to take it a bit further.

In the past year alone, Matthaus has called for Thomas Tuchel to be sacked, questioned the signing of Eric Dier, claimed Jadon Sancho’s influence at Borussia Dortmund had been exaggerated by the media and said he “felt sorry” for Cristiano Ronaldo whose “ego trips” had “damaged the team and himself”.

Advertisement

Last November, Tuchel referenced Matthaus and Hamann in a press conference after a 4-0 victory over Borussia Dortmund, saying: “Can I quote Lothar and Didi? For a team with no further development and a bad relationship between coach and players, that was alright today, I’d say. I’m sure the experts will tell you the rest themselves.” Nice.

Matthaus is probably still tame compared to Rafael van der Vaart, who, since retiring, has very much earned a reputation for making unfiltered and inflammatory comments in his role as a pundit in the Netherlands.

You may recall Van der Vaart had a pop at England’s Declan Rice after the Euro 2024 final on the coverage of Dutch broadcaster NOS, saying: “£100million for Declan Rice, what does he do? He comes to collect a ball only to pass it back to John Stones. He is useless. If you are truly worth £100m then you should be able to play a ball forward.”

This was very much in character for Van der Vaart, whose appreciation for the England team seems to be somewhat lacking given he also decried the whole side as “s***”, also on NOS, after they defeated the Netherlands 2-1 in the semi-finals.

Advertisement

Over in Spain, you may be most familiar with Spanish football TV punditry from clips of El Chiringuito de Jugones, a late-night debate show in which a cast of big personalities voice their opinions — usually quite loudly and with little sense of impartiality.

In recent years the programme has gained notoriety for interviewing Real Madrid president Florentino Perez after the attempted launch of the European Super League, using the phrase “tic tac” to announce incoming transfer news (imitating the ticking of a clock) and showing three minutes of former Madrid midfielder Guti looking sad after his old side’s 4-0 Champions League defeat by Manchester City last year.

Advertisement

You will find a more sophisticated level of discussion on TV channel Movistar Plus and streaming platform DAZN. The former features former Madrid and Argentina player turned pundit Jorge Valdano while presenter Miguel Quintana and former Equatorial Guinea international Alberto Edjogo-Owono, who spent his career in the Spanish lower leagues, are two respected voices on DAZN.

But the way fandom works in Spain — in particular with the big two clubs, Barcelona and Madrid — means those pundits are often labelled the enemy of one or other team, despite trying to be impartial.

In Spain, there is also a deeper layer of scrutiny towards refereeing and why decisions do or do not happen (possibly linked to the above). There is no equivalent of Match of the Day, perhaps because there is not much interest in analysing games like Osasuna versus Getafe from a tactical perspective. And the tactical insight mainly comes from social media rather than mass media.

As for other prominent pundits, Guti has made a name for himself on DAZN, while Gaizka Mendieta and Juanfran Torres are also regulars on television.

Often more in-depth analysis can be found on late-night radio shows such as El Larguero on Cadena SER or Cadena COPE’s El Partidazo — both of which go on until the early hours and continue to attract huge audiences, as The Athletic’s Laia Cervello Herrero explored earlier this year. Even then, debates can get heated given the nature of football in Spain.

Advertisement

You might think the tone would be fairly outrageous in a football-mad country like Brazil, but while passions undoubtedly run extremely high and some coverage can be melodramatic, there is also room for reasoned debate.

The biggest difference in Brazil is the volume of the commentators, who are the stars of the show.

“The commentator really goes for it,” Natalie Gedra, a football reporter for Sky Sports in the UK who previously worked for ESPN and Globo in Brazil, tells The Athletic. “Brazilians cannot understand countries who don’t scream ‘GOOOOOOAAAAAAL!’ There’s also a tune that comes with it, either the club’s anthem or a song that’s related to the national team.

“Visually it’s different too — for example, you will have a gigantic ball going back and forth on the screen between transitions of replays. I remember watching World Cups growing up and they had a little mascot who would show up on the screen and dance around.”

Having ex-referees as pundits, for example, has been a well-established practice in Brazil for at least a decade, formerly in the commentary box but now more as studio analysts. Oh, and the studios are always at TV HQ, not on site at stadiums.

Advertisement

Talking of the commentary box, it’s typically filled with three people – a commentator, i.e. the star, a journalist and a former player.

“They have more ex-players now, but a lot of journalists are co-commentators or pundits on both pre and post-match shows,” Gedra adds. “Everyone knows the commentator; they’re massive stars.”

Reflecting how their best players tend to head to Europe, Brazil’s most famous ex-players aren’t really part of the TV coverage over there, other than for World Cups. Ronaldo worked on the 2014 World Cup and, most famously, Pele was a commentator for the 1994 World Cup.

“There are some ex-players, like, for example (Walter) Casagrande, who played for Corinthians. He was the most prominent for many years,” Gedra says. “He was a bit of a pioneer, he had a big profile and didn’t back down from making big statements, but he was also very articulate.

“The main Brazilian football names don’t become pundits in Brazil, but Pele in 1994 is by far the most famous example. There is a picture of him celebrating in the commentary booth with commentator Galvao Bueno which is one of the most iconic images in the history of Brazilian television.

Advertisement

“Galvao Bueno is probably the biggest name in the history of Brazilian TV, he’s absolutely huge and the voice of many of the biggest sporting moments, like all the World Cups. Yes, people love or hate him but everybody knows who he is.”

Commentators in the UK don’t have anywhere near as big a profile. No wonder Guy Mowbray has started doing Gladiators.

Another difference is in the make-up of the post-match chat. Gedra has observed that Brazil’s coverage is less data-orientated than in the UK, although the tone depends on the channel. Globo, the free-to-air channel, have largely monopolised coverage but they are now under threat from newer players such as Sport TV, ESPN and TNT Sports. YouTube channels are also growing.

“I worked for ESPN and I think they got the tone just right, very analytical and not too spectacular or passionate,” Gedra says.

Advertisement

Unspectacular is definitely not a word you would use to describe the stylings of Alexi Lalas, one of the most prominent broadcasters in the U.S., whose brash persona brings a love-it-or-hate-it quality.

He works as an analyst for Fox Sports, has a podcast called Alexi Lalas’ State of the Union and doesn’t care if people like him or not. But his bold, direct and outspoken opinions have made him an influential figure in the U.S. and beyond.

Lalas is another who doesn’t seem to especially like English players, saying during the Euros that Gareth Southgate’s team were “insufferable as they are talented”.

“But I’m in the entertainment business,” Lalas told The Athletic earlier this year. “I am a performer. When you say that, sometimes people cringe. By no means am I saying that I can’t be authentic and genuine. But I recognise the way I say something is as important as what I say.

“When I go on TV, I put on a costume and when that red light goes on, I don’t want people changing the channel.”

Advertisement

Lalas’ audacious approach is a bit of a leap from the English-style NBC coverage that rose to prominence a few years ago. A number of ex-Premier League players headed Stateside and made names for themselves, such as Robbie Earle and Robbie Mustoe — while having decent careers in England, neither was a household name when playing for Wimbledon and Middlesbrough respectively.

go-deeper

GO DEEPER

Access all areas at NBC: Three Premier League games, a Winnebago and tactical sushi

The pair, who have their own podcast called The 2 Robbies, gave NBC’s coverage a familiar feel alongside commentator Arlo White and pundit Lee Dixon, while former Stoke City defender Danny Higginbotham is another face of the channel having moved Stateside. “What we’ve tried to do from the start is talk in a normal way about football,” Earle told The Guardian in 2017. An underrated concept.

Fox Sports also employ recognisable names from UK TV coverage including commentator (sorry, ‘play-by-play announcer’) Ian Darke, former Newcastle defender Warren Barton and ex-Sky Sports reporter Geoff Shreeves. Fox also use Mark Clattenburg as a refereeing analyst.

Undoubtedly the most renowned U.S. soccer coverage, though, is on CBS Sports via its hugely popular Golazo Champions League show, complete with the instantly recognisable line-up of Kate Abdo, Thierry Henry, Micah Richards and Jamie Carragher, whose on-screen chemistry make them a social media staple on every matchday.

Advertisement

Left to right: Kate Abdo, Thierry Henry, Jamie Carragher and Micah Richards have been a hit on CBS (Robbie Jay Barratt – AMA/Getty Images)

Pete Radovich, the coordinating producer of the UEFA Champions League coverage on CBS Sports, told The Athletic in September on how he came to realise that the network’s Champions League Today studio now owns the global conversation on major nights of European football.

“Thierry Henry, in no uncertain terms, says he gets asked more about CBS now than Arsenal,” he said. “That to me is wild.”

The show’s razor-sharp use of social media and its mix of humour, analysis and engaging post-match interviews with managers and players is a winning formula, while most importantly the quartet’s camaraderie feels natural, warm and unforced.

Americans showing the world how to make excellent football soccer coverage? It’s a brave new world.

(Top photos: Getty Images; design: Dan Goldfarb)

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Sports

Former NCAA swimmer Riley Gaines calls out ‘deranged’ co-hosts of ‘The View’ over Capitol Hill bathroom ban

Published

on

Former NCAA swimmer Riley Gaines calls out ‘deranged’ co-hosts of ‘The View’ over Capitol Hill bathroom ban

Former University of Kentucky swimmer Riley Gaines blasted the co-hosts of “The View” on Wednesday, calling them “deranged” and “out of touch” after they spoke out in defense of Delaware Rep.-elect Sarah McBride over a resolution that would ban transgender women from using women’s restrooms at the U.S. Capitol.

Gaines, a 12-time NCAA All-American swimmer who has publicly spoken out against trans inclusion in women’s and girls sports and advocated for protecting women’s spaces, posted a message on X calling out the group for speaking out on an issue that does not directly impact them.

Former competitve swimmer Riley Gaines speaks during a campaign rally for Republican presidential nominee, former U.S. President Donald Trump at Desert Diamond Arena on August 23, 2024, in Glendale, Arizona. The rally, held in partnership with Turning Point PAC and Turning Point Action, came two weeks after Democratic presidential nominee U.S. Vice President Harris held a rally at the same location.  (Rebecca Noble/Getty Images)

“I wonder if the deranged, out-of-touch women on The View would be comfortable letting Mr. McBride change in a locker room inches away from their own daughters,” she wrote in a post on X which accompanied a clip of the show. 

Advertisement

“It never matters until it affects you personally.” 

Gaines competed against former UPenn swimmer Lia Thomas, a transgender athlete, at the NCAA championships in 2022, where she said the NCAA had opted to give Thomas the fifth-place trophy for the “photo op” despite them tying in the women’s 200 freestyle.  

Thomas would go on to win a national title in the women’s 500 freestyle. 

Gaines was responding to a segment of Tuesday’s episode of “The View” where the co-hosts reacted to a resolution by Rep. Nancy Mace, R-S.C., to ban transgender women from using women’s restrooms at the U.S. Capitol in response to McBride, the first openly transgender federal lawmaker set to join Congress in January.

RILEY GAINES REPEATEDLY TEARS INTO AOC FOR TAKING PRONOUNS OUT OF X BIO AFTER ADVOCATING FOR TRANS ATHLETES

Advertisement

“I don’t understand how this is [Mace’s] welcome to someone who is coming to make a difference in the country,” Whoopi Goldberg said.  

Rep.-elect Sarah McBride

Rep.-elect Sarah McBride, D-Del., poses for a photograph after joining other congressional freshmen of the 119th Congress for a group photograph on the steps of the House of Representatives at the U.S. Capitol Building on Nov. 15, 2024 in Washington, D.C. (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

“It’s not a welcome, it’s flipping her the middle finger. Because she is the one person in the House that this will affect,” Sara Haines responded, adding, “And this woman that came and sat at our table is one of the most decent, amazing politicians I’ve ever seen. Her messaging resounded across the boards.”

Alyssa Farah Griffin chimed in, calling the attempt to ban McBride “gross.”

“It is a new member of Congress, who ran as a centrist democrat, talked about issues – pocketbook issues. She said at our table ‘I am not a spokesperson for my community. I’m running to deliver for Delaware.’ And Nancy Mace is trying to goad her into a fight she did not sign up to be part of. She’s trying to pigeonhole her into ‘You have to be this culture warrior, who makes this your whole identity’ purely because Nancy Mace doesn’t like how she chooses to exist.” 

Advertisement
Mace speaks to reporters in Capitol hallway

U.S. Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) arrives for a House Republican caucus meeting at the U.S. Capitol on November 19, 2024, in Washington, DC. Mace introduced legislation that would require House members and staffers from “using single-sex facilities other than those corresponding to their biological sex.”  (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

Gaines said in a separate post on X Wednesday that she would be “happy” to join “The View” for a conversation after disagreeing with Goldberg’s numbers regarding trans athletes competing in public schools. 

Fox News’ Liz Elkind contributed to this report. 

Follow Fox News Digital’s sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Sports

Freddie Freeman grand slam ball to be auctioned. Could bring 'life-changing money' for Venice family

Published

on

Freddie Freeman grand slam ball to be auctioned. Could bring 'life-changing money' for Venice family

The past few weeks have been a whirlwind for Zachary Ruderman.

He’s the 10-year-old Dodgers fan who ended up with one of the most significant baseballs in team history — the one his favorite player, first baseman Freddie Freeman, hit for a walk-off grand slam during the 10th inning in Game 1 of the 2024 World Series against the New York Yankees.

Since then, Zachary has seemingly become one of the most famous people living in Venice.

“It’s a lot more attention than my son has ever had,” his father, Nico Ruderman, said. “He’s spoken to so many media outlets, so many interviews. People recognize him. I mean, literally everywhere we go people stop him and want to take pictures with him. He’s really actually been loving it. It’s been a fun experience for him.”

That experience is entering a new phase. On Wednesday, SCP Auctions announced the ball will be up for bid from Dec. 4-14. Coming just weeks after the Dodgers won their eighth World Series championship — with Freeman hitting four home runs and winning MVP honors, all on a badly sprained ankle — SCP founder and president David Kohler said his company thinks “the sky’s the limit” for what the auction could bring.

Advertisement

“We think this is gonna bring seven figures,” Kohler said. “We think it’s one of the most historic baseballs ever, with the moment of this World Series, the first walk-off grand slam, the whole story of Freddie Freeman, the Dodgers, Game 1, extra innings. Just everything about it. I mean, it’s one of the most historic moments in sports and we feel that people are going to appreciate that.”

Last month, Dodgers superstar Shohei Ohtani’s 50th home run ball was sold by Goldin Auctions for a record $4.4 million. Could the Freeman ball be worth even more than that?

Zachary Ruderman holds up Freddie Freeman’s grand slam ball with his parents, Nico and Anne, at his side.

(Courtesy of Nico Ruderman)

Advertisement

“It could be. You never know,” Kohler said. “We’re gonna find out. Certainly the Ohtani ball was very, very significant and Ohtani is beloved, but this is more of the history of the game of baseball and just the moment — seeing that happen was just incredible.”

Zachary, along with his father and mother Anne, were part of that moment. After Freeman blasted his game-winning shot into the right-field pavilion, the ball rolled next to Zachary’s feet. The fifth-grader batted it over to his father, who pounced on it, stood up and handed it back to his son.

“They’re just amazing memories,” Zachary said Thursday, looking back on that night. “Like after we got it, no one was mad. No one was trying to take it from us. Everyone was just super happy.”

His father added: “We just feel so lucky and honored to be a small part of such a huge moment in Dodger history.”

The experience was so special that at first the family had no intention of parting with the ball.

Advertisement

“That night when we caught it we were like, ‘We’re gonna keep this forever,’” Ruderman said. “The problem is, if we keep it, we’re not gonna keep it in our house. I don’t want to pay for the insurance for it, so it would just be locked up in some safety deposit box. Nobody would ever see it.

Zachary Ruderman holds his Freddie Freeman grand slam ball while posing with L.A. City Councilmember Traci Park at City Hall

Zachary Ruderman holds his Freddie Freeman grand slam ball while posing with L.A. City Councilmember Traci Park at City Hall.

(Nico Ruderman)

“Maybe [the auction] brings life-changing money and pays for education for our son, and also allows somebody with the resources to actually display it and show it to the world. We’re really hoping that whoever buys it agrees to display it at Dodger Stadium for some time so everybody can see it. That’s really our wish.”

Even with all the incredible experiences he’s had because of the ball — including his favorite, speaking in front of Los Angeles City Council at City Hall and receiving a certificate of congratulations from Councilmember Traci Park earlier this month — Zachary said he’s “really excited” about the auction.

Advertisement

“It’s probably going to be a pretty fun experience,” Zachary said.

“We’ve had our fun with the ball,” his father added. “At this point he cares more about the memories, the pictures. He loves reading all the articles and watching all the news stories about it. That’s what’s fun for him, not the item itself.”

Continue Reading

Trending