Connect with us

Sports

How England hired ‘outstanding’ Thomas Tuchel – and why not everyone is happy about it

Published

on

How England hired ‘outstanding’ Thomas Tuchel – and why not everyone is happy about it

When Gareth Southgate resigned the day after the Euro 2024 final, the Football Association had a huge task ahead of it: to replace England’s greatest manager of the modern era, the man who had redefined the role.

It was not a position it ever wanted to be in. The hope had been that if England had beaten Spain in Berlin, Southgate could have been persuaded to go on another two years. But with Southgate leaving, the FA’s CEO Mark Bullingham and technical director John McDermott had no choice but to look elsewhere.

Three months later, Bullingham was sat in Wembley Stadium’s media room, with McDermott watching on a few yards away. And next to Bullingham was Thomas Tuchel, the new England manager, having signed his 18-month contract eight days earlier.

The FA was delighted to land a manager who Bullingham described as giving England “the best chance of winning the World Cup” and who had been keen on taking the job for some time. His contract, which is worth around £6million a year, includes a bonus for winning the World Cup and he will be assisted by his long-time lieutenant, Anthony Barry.

Tuchel arrives with a glittering CV and a sense of glamour. He won the Champions League and the Club World Cup at Chelsea. Unlike Fabio Capello, who took the job at 61, Tuchel — aged 51 — is at his peak.

Advertisement

But it was not an appointment without its challenges or even controversies. The Athletic has spoken to multiple people with knowledge of the FA’s process — all of whom wished to remain anonymous to protect their relationships — and can reveal:

  • A shortlist of candidates to succeed Southgate had been drawn up before the European Championship.
  • Pep Guardiola was the FA’s ideal candidate but he would not commit to taking the job.
  • Bullingham’s claim that the FA “interviewed approximately 10 people” riled some of those connected to leading contenders, who felt it mischaracterised how seriously other candidates had been considered.
  • The treatment of Lee Carsley, who was left to struggle with questions about whether he wanted the permanent job even after Tuchel had signed his contract, surprised former FA insiders.
  • Tuchel will not attend either of England’s November internationals against Greece and the Republic of Ireland as he prepares to start formally on January 1.


When the FA put its succession plan into action, it had one clear goal: to try to win the World Cup in 2026. “As we set out our process,” Bullingham said on Wednesday, “our priority was to find someone that can give our players the best possible chance to win.”

The first public step in the recruitment came at the end of the week in which Southgate resigned. On the morning of July 18, the FA published its job description for the role of Men’s Senior Team Head Coach.

The very first bullet point proved that the FA was going for someone to help it win that first major men’s trophy since 1966. “Lead and develop the England senior men’s team to win a major tournament,” it read, “and be consistently ranked as one of the top teams in the world.” The posting also mentioned that the successful candidate must have a “strong track record delivering results in the Premier League and/or leading international competitions”.

As soon as the FA published that, it was clear what its “ideal profile”, in Bullingham’s words, was for the job. It was looking for an experienced winner who had a proven record at the top of the game rather than someone who would just keep the Southgate culture ticking along.

Advertisement

The other key factor from the start concerned nationality. Southgate had been hugely successful during his near eight-year tenure and was very proud of his work building a distinctly English identity for the national team, but the FA wanted to cast the net as wide as possible in pursuit of his successor.


Gareth Southgate narrowly missed out on silverware with England (Dan Mullan/Getty Images)

In the summer, the FA board held a vote on whether the new coach should be English or not. While there was some appetite for England to choose an English coach — citing the belief that the game’s major countries should not be looking outside their own borders for managers — the vote went overwhelmingly the other way.

So while being English would not be a criterion in the search, experience of English football and of developing English players would be. There was to be no repeat of the Capello situation in 2007, when a previously successful manager was parachuted into the England job with no prior experience in English football.

Put all of those criteria together and a few names clearly stood out. Tuchel, Mauricio Pochettino, Jurgen Klopp and, above all, Pep Guardiola.

Guardiola was the FA’s dream candidate. In 15 full seasons of senior management, he has won 12 league titles, three Champions Leagues, six domestic cups, four UEFA Super Cups and four Club World Cups. He has done so with a distinctive style that has arguably revolutionised how football is played in this country. And he is deeply rooted in English football, having developed a sizeable percentage of the current England team, including Kyle Walker, John Stones, Phil Foden and Rico Lewis, since joining Manchester City in 2016.

Advertisement
go-deeper

GO DEEPER

Thomas Tuchel: England have hired a ‘winner’ but that is no guarantee in international football

But there were two problems. The first was that Guardiola is contracted to City until the end of this season. With City taking part in the Club World Cup next summer, he would be unable to manage England until the September 2025 break, less than a year before the 2026 World Cup. It is hard to see how such a limited time with the England players could ever have been deemed conducive to the FA’s goal of winning that tournament, which will be co-hosted in the United States, Canada and Mexico.

The second was that Guardiola himself has not decided what he will do at the end of this City contract: stay, take a break, or go to a different job. There were other factors at play here outside the FA’s control, not least City’s ‘115 charges’ legal battle with the Premier League, the outcome of which could have a significant bearing on the club’s prospects next season and beyond.

People in the industry, including some who know him well, have noted that Guardiola changes his mind almost every day about what he wants to do next summer. When he went on Italian TV last week to discuss his future — after Tuchel had signed his England deal but before the news broke — he said that he had not decided what he would do next, but that “anything can happen”.


Pep Guardiola was the FA’s dream choice (Gareth Copley/Getty Images)

The FA did reach out to Guardiola, but he would not commit to taking the job. He would have been ideal and there was excitement about the prospect of appointing the most successful manager of the 21st century to lead the England team. But with Guardiola unable to commit, that optimism faded and the talks never became advanced.

Advertisement

Bullingham did not reference Guardiola specifically in his press conference on Wednesday but did acknowledge that “clearly some (candidates) were more up for the role than others” when asked whether the FA had been rejected by anyone. When contacted by The Athletic, the FA and City declined to comment.

With Guardiola out of the picture, who else was there? Jurgen Klopp ticked all the same boxes as Guardiola and, unlike the City manager, was out of work having left Liverpool at the end of last season. But he made clear that he would not be jumping straight back into the game after ending a draining nine-year tenure at Anfield. Speaking at a coaching conference while the FA was still accepting job applications, Klopp said it would be “the biggest loss of face in the history of football” if he were to go into another job immediately. He has subsequently taken a role as Red Bull’s head of global soccer.

Pochettino was also out of work then, having left Chelsea at the end of last season. He would also have scored highly based on what the FA were looking for. Plenty of England players from the Euros — Luke Shaw, Walker, Harry Kane, Kieran Trippier, Conor Gallagher, Cole Palmer — owe much of their development to the Argentinian and his coaching staff. Pochettino, however, has since become the new manager of the United States’ men’s national team.

In terms of English candidates, Graham Potter has been out of work since he was sacked by Chelsea in April last year. There was support for Potter’s potential candidacy from other Premier League managers, but contact never got beyond the informal stage.

When Potter was a guest analyst on UK broadcaster Sky Sports’ Monday Night Football show on September 30, he said he was “supportive of whatever the FA decide to do” and “supportive of whoever the coach is”. When asked whether he would prefer his next job to be in club or international football, he said that he was “open to anything”.

Advertisement

Interest in Graham Potter never progressed to an advanced stage (Glyn Kirk/AFP via Getty Images)

Eddie Howe was one of the early favourites and the possibility of an England approach for him overshadowed his Newcastle United side’s start to the season after what had already been a summer of upheaval. The FA approaching Newcastle and trying to negotiate compensation for their head coach would have been a difficult situation for everyone involved. Ultimately, Howe was never put in a position where he had to make a tough decision: there was no direct approach to him and he did not apply for the role.

When asked whether he was contacted on Friday, Howe said “no” and confirmed that he was not interviewed. He added: “I was lucky and fortunate enough to watch him at Chelsea. What a brilliant guy, person and coach, I had two days with him and thought he was fascinating. I really wish him well. I think he’s a great appointment. I hope he leads England to many trophies.”

There was consternation among some candidates at Bullingham saying on Wednesday that the FA “interviewed approximately 10 people”. Some of those closely connected to the candidates took issue with that presentation of the hiring process, pointing out that one informal phone call did not necessarily constitute an interview.

go-deeper

GO DEEPER

What sort of football will Thomas Tuchel’s England play?


Ultimately, it was Tuchel who ticked more of the FA’s boxes than anyone else, especially once it was clear that Guardiola was not going to happen. Here was a candidate who had won things at the highest level and who was at the cutting edge of modern tactics and coaching. He was unattached, having left Bayern Munich at the end of last season, meaning there would be no wrangling over compensation.

Advertisement

And while he was not English, he had a direct connection to English football. Tuchel had a fantastic 20-month spell at Chelsea, bonding with the fans and developing English talents including Mason Mount, Reece James and Ben Chilwell, all of whom played for Southgate’s national team. Tuchel was a big admirer of English players. He signed Kane and Eric Dier for Bayern and wanted Declan Rice, too.

He loved living in England and was widely known to be keen to return, but Tuchel was not going to be on the market forever. He spoke to Manchester United in June about potentially replacing Erik ten Hag, but no deal was reached, and he had been linked to the club again more recently after United’s poor start to the new season.

Once the FA identified Tuchel as their preferred candidate, it moved fast and secretively. The first meeting was just with McDermott. Tuchel — who told the BBC that the FA had first approached him in late August — spoke on Wednesday about the good feeling he got when he learned this job was “about football” and specifically about the focus on trying to win the next World Cup.


From left: new assistant manager Anthony Barry, FA CEO Mark Bullingham, head coach Thomas Tuchel and technical director John McDermott (Eddie Keogh/The FA via Getty Images)

The second meeting was with McDermott and Bullingham, where Tuchel gave a presentation about how he intended to work, which hugely impressed his interviewers. “Thomas was absolutely outstanding,” Bullingham said on Wednesday, “providing a really clear vision for the role and how he would work with our players and get the best out of them and to give us the best chance at the World Cup.”

From there the process was, as Tuchel put it on Wednesday, “very fast, very exciting, very confidential, very trustful”, with his agent Olaf Meinking doing the deal directly with the FA. On October 8, Bullingham presented Tuchel’s proposed appointment at a hurriedly convened meeting of the FA board.

Advertisement

It was a very brief meeting held on Microsoft Teams, with some members unable to even make the start of it. While there was no debate on the call, it did leave some members wondering afterwards why there was such a rush to secure Tuchel’s signature, given Carsley was already in place to manage the two November games and England will not play again after those until next March.

It was only at the end of that week that news of England’s serious interest in Tuchel started to emerge in Germany, but he and the FA wanted to keep this as discreet as possible, Tuchel admitting on Wednesday he did not even call Kane, England captain and his former player from Bayern, to discuss his taking over.

The FA did not want the news to emerge during the course of this month’s international break, when England played Greece and Finland still under the interim management of under-21s head coach Carsley. But this meant that he was placed in the difficult position of having to answer questions about whether he wanted the permanent job even though someone had already signed a contract to take over.


Lee Carsley was left in an awkward position in having to field questions over his interest in the England job (Justin Setterfield/Getty Images)

Carsley visibly struggled with it twice, first after the Greece game, when he said that he would “hopefully” return to the under-21s after November, and then again following the Finland match, when he said England should appoint a “world-class” manager who had won things, unlike him.

Both of those statements make far more sense in the context of what was happening behind the scenes, but at the time they caused confusion and left Carsley looking out of his depth. One former senior FA employee told The Athletic they had been surprised by the organisation’s handling of Carsley’s situation.

Advertisement
go-deeper

GO DEEPER

Tuchel’s unveiling dissected: ’10 interviews’, national anthem and Kane’s role


For all the pride in securing Tuchel, Wednesday’s unveiling press conference still left plenty of questions for the FA.

There is the matter of his start date, not until January 1, which means that Carsley will take England for two more games in November. The FA confirmed to The Athletic Tuchel will not even attend those matches against Greece in Athens and the Irish at Wembley.

On Wednesday, Bullingham said the January start date was decided on so that Tuchel could have a “singular focus” on the World Cup qualification campaign, but if England finish second in their Nations League group — which is the position they are currently in — they will have play-offs in that competition next March anyway.

There is also the issue of the Football Leadership Diversity Code.

Advertisement

At the start of this process, the FA said it would comply with its requirements. The code, set up in 2020 to encourage diversity in football jobs, states that: “Shortlists for interview will have at least one male and one female Black, Asian or of Mixed-Heritage candidate if applicants meeting the job specifications apply.” At the end of the process, it did not appear that this specific criteria had been met, although the FA did take the unusual step of advertising the job publicly so as to encourage the broadest range of possible applicants.

The fact that, after eight years of Southgate, the FA has decided to go for an elite foreign manager has caused disappointment in some quarters, but the pool of English managers is quite shallow and Bullingham admitted on Wednesday that the FA was not awash with English options for this post.

“Clearly, you would love to five to 10 domestic candidates who are coaching clubs in your domestic league, challenging and winning honours,” he said. “We are not quite in that place at the moment.” Once the FA board had approved the idea of going for a non-English coach in the summer, the likeliest outcome was a big European name such as Tuchel.


Tuchel (centre) and Bullingham take questions from media at Wednesday’s press conference (Ryan Pierse/Getty Images)

Overall, the appointment has met with a positive reaction from fans who recognise that Tuchel has an excellent track record, competing at the highest level of the club game all over Europe. Anyone who saw him on Wednesday will have been impressed by his charisma and clarity on stage. He will be a compelling and recognisable frontman for English football on the biggest stage in 2026 (assuming England qualify, as they have for the past seven World Cups). He may even help them to win it.

England now have a manager who is at the cutting edge of European football and that has not always been the case in the past, but at the same time, it is clearly a risk.

Advertisement

Tuchel is unlikely to be here for a long time and if he does not deliver the trophy he has been brought in to target, England may have to start all over again.

Additional reporting: David Ornstein, Simon Hughes, Dan Sheldon, George Caulkin

(Top photo: Michael Regan – The FA/The FA via Getty Images; design: Meech Robinson)

Sports

The State of Punditry – part 2: How the world analyses football – and the U.S. lead the way

Published

on

The State of Punditry – part 2: How the world analyses football – and the U.S. lead the way

Football coverage is a divisive subject.

Some think the standard of punditry is great, others will tell you it needs some work and some will deride it as awful. The analysis of the analysis never ends.

This week, The Athletic is looking more closely at the state of the industry, starting with yesterday’s piece assessing what is demanded of pundits in the United Kingdom in 2024 and how people consume their work.

Today, we broaden the discussion to see how UK coverage stacks up against the rest of the world, including the proudest of all football nations Germany, Brazil and Spain, together with those pesky upstarts in the U.S..


In Europe, the landscape of punditry can be wildly different. Travel to Italy, Spain or Turkey, switch on a television and scan through the channels and you’ll almost certainly be able to find some football coverage, be it via a football talk show, replays of matches, or on the news.

Advertisement

This is the case in the UK, too, via Sky Sports’ network of channels, but we’re talking free-to-air here in countries where people are arguably far more obsessed with football than your average UK football diehard.

It borders on fanaticism in a place like Turkey and the at-times frantic coverage reflects that. One grim incident recently showcased how seriously football is taken, when pundit Serhat Akin was shot in the foot when leaving a TV studio.

The former Fenerbahce player had been covering the club’s match against Belgian side Union Saint-Gilloise from an Istanbul studio, after which he was approached and shot by a masked man.

Akin posted a picture of his bloodied foot on Instagram with the caption: “They shot my foot, our last word is Fenerbahce.”

Over in Germany things are a bit calmer.

In many ways the coverage is very similar to in the UK, only probably a bit better. Standard Bundesliga behaviour.

Advertisement

Why? Well, depending on your disposition, they don’t quite have as much forced melodrama that you tend to find with the Premier League.

The punditry industry is not quite as accessible for ex-players, so the notion of former pros that you’d get on, say, a certain national radio station in the UK where certain people will make certain comments to attract attention doesn’t really exist.

Presenters, again, unlike in the UK with Gary Lineker, Alex Scott, or, until recently, Jermaine Jenas, are media professionals rather than players. Pundits include Per Mertesacker and Christoph Kramer, the 2014 World Cup winner who has been an analyst for many years already despite being only 33 years old and still not officially retired (he left Borussia Mönchengladbach in the summer).


Germany coach Julian Nagelsmann speaks with Christoph Kramer (second right) and (right) Per Mertesacker (Tom Weller/picture alliance via Getty Images)

They have a tactics corner on Sky via Dutchman Erik Meijer, the one-time Liverpool striker who spent much of his career in Germany. In a recent interview with The Athletic, Meijer described his reaction to being asked to appear on German television: “The first question I had was, ‘There are 80 million Germans in this country so why do they need to employ a Dutchman? But they wanted a different voice — someone who would say that Bayern Munich were c**p when they were.”

Julia Simic, who used to play for the women’s national team, is also a regular, while pundits who cover the Premier League include former goalkeeper Rene Adler and ex-Croatia international and Fulham and West Ham striker Mladen Petric.

Advertisement

While Germans do like other sports, such as basketball, handball and tennis, football is the main draw and the coverage can be dense and fanatical, although it tends to be quite considered and mindful of weighty issues. The rise of vloggers and influencers we have seen in the UK hasn’t yet caught on.

Probably the most high profile figure is Wolff Fuss, inflection king extraordinaire. Search for him on TikTok and you’ll find 20 million matches. Fuss has the stage to himself because, in another difference to the UK, co-commentators are quite uncommon in Germany.

If Fuss is the main man, then Lothar Matthaus is the loudest. Not necessarily in volume, but in the decibel level of his opinions (and his outfits… Matthaus caught the eye at this summer’s European Championship with some striking gilets).


Lothar Matthaus (right), complete with gilet (Marcus Brandt/picture alliance via Getty Images)

Matthaus could probably be compared to Gary Neville or Jamie Carragher in that he gives forthright views on “his” club, which in this case would be Bayern Munich. Neville and Carragher constantly attract the attention of Manchester United and Liverpool managers with their views but Matthaus — and his partner-in-crime, Dietmar Hamann — tend to take it a bit further.

In the past year alone, Matthaus has called for Thomas Tuchel to be sacked, questioned the signing of Eric Dier, claimed Jadon Sancho’s influence at Borussia Dortmund had been exaggerated by the media and said he “felt sorry” for Cristiano Ronaldo whose “ego trips” had “damaged the team and himself”.

Advertisement

Last November, Tuchel referenced Matthaus and Hamann in a press conference after a 4-0 victory over Borussia Dortmund, saying: “Can I quote Lothar and Didi? For a team with no further development and a bad relationship between coach and players, that was alright today, I’d say. I’m sure the experts will tell you the rest themselves.” Nice.

Matthaus is probably still tame compared to Rafael van der Vaart, who, since retiring, has very much earned a reputation for making unfiltered and inflammatory comments in his role as a pundit in the Netherlands.

You may recall Van der Vaart had a pop at England’s Declan Rice after the Euro 2024 final on the coverage of Dutch broadcaster NOS, saying: “£100million for Declan Rice, what does he do? He comes to collect a ball only to pass it back to John Stones. He is useless. If you are truly worth £100m then you should be able to play a ball forward.”

This was very much in character for Van der Vaart, whose appreciation for the England team seems to be somewhat lacking given he also decried the whole side as “s***”, also on NOS, after they defeated the Netherlands 2-1 in the semi-finals.

Advertisement

Over in Spain, you may be most familiar with Spanish football TV punditry from clips of El Chiringuito de Jugones, a late-night debate show in which a cast of big personalities voice their opinions — usually quite loudly and with little sense of impartiality.

In recent years the programme has gained notoriety for interviewing Real Madrid president Florentino Perez after the attempted launch of the European Super League, using the phrase “tic tac” to announce incoming transfer news (imitating the ticking of a clock) and showing three minutes of former Madrid midfielder Guti looking sad after his old side’s 4-0 Champions League defeat by Manchester City last year.

Advertisement

You will find a more sophisticated level of discussion on TV channel Movistar Plus and streaming platform DAZN. The former features former Madrid and Argentina player turned pundit Jorge Valdano while presenter Miguel Quintana and former Equatorial Guinea international Alberto Edjogo-Owono, who spent his career in the Spanish lower leagues, are two respected voices on DAZN.

But the way fandom works in Spain — in particular with the big two clubs, Barcelona and Madrid — means those pundits are often labelled the enemy of one or other team, despite trying to be impartial.

In Spain, there is also a deeper layer of scrutiny towards refereeing and why decisions do or do not happen (possibly linked to the above). There is no equivalent of Match of the Day, perhaps because there is not much interest in analysing games like Osasuna versus Getafe from a tactical perspective. And the tactical insight mainly comes from social media rather than mass media.

As for other prominent pundits, Guti has made a name for himself on DAZN, while Gaizka Mendieta and Juanfran Torres are also regulars on television.

Often more in-depth analysis can be found on late-night radio shows such as El Larguero on Cadena SER or Cadena COPE’s El Partidazo — both of which go on until the early hours and continue to attract huge audiences, as The Athletic’s Laia Cervello Herrero explored earlier this year. Even then, debates can get heated given the nature of football in Spain.

Advertisement

You might think the tone would be fairly outrageous in a football-mad country like Brazil, but while passions undoubtedly run extremely high and some coverage can be melodramatic, there is also room for reasoned debate.

The biggest difference in Brazil is the volume of the commentators, who are the stars of the show.

“The commentator really goes for it,” Natalie Gedra, a football reporter for Sky Sports in the UK who previously worked for ESPN and Globo in Brazil, tells The Athletic. “Brazilians cannot understand countries who don’t scream ‘GOOOOOOAAAAAAL!’ There’s also a tune that comes with it, either the club’s anthem or a song that’s related to the national team.

“Visually it’s different too — for example, you will have a gigantic ball going back and forth on the screen between transitions of replays. I remember watching World Cups growing up and they had a little mascot who would show up on the screen and dance around.”

Having ex-referees as pundits, for example, has been a well-established practice in Brazil for at least a decade, formerly in the commentary box but now more as studio analysts. Oh, and the studios are always at TV HQ, not on site at stadiums.

Advertisement

Talking of the commentary box, it’s typically filled with three people – a commentator, i.e. the star, a journalist and a former player.

“They have more ex-players now, but a lot of journalists are co-commentators or pundits on both pre and post-match shows,” Gedra adds. “Everyone knows the commentator; they’re massive stars.”

Reflecting how their best players tend to head to Europe, Brazil’s most famous ex-players aren’t really part of the TV coverage over there, other than for World Cups. Ronaldo worked on the 2014 World Cup and, most famously, Pele was a commentator for the 1994 World Cup.

“There are some ex-players, like, for example (Walter) Casagrande, who played for Corinthians. He was the most prominent for many years,” Gedra says. “He was a bit of a pioneer, he had a big profile and didn’t back down from making big statements, but he was also very articulate.

“The main Brazilian football names don’t become pundits in Brazil, but Pele in 1994 is by far the most famous example. There is a picture of him celebrating in the commentary booth with commentator Galvao Bueno which is one of the most iconic images in the history of Brazilian television.

Advertisement

“Galvao Bueno is probably the biggest name in the history of Brazilian TV, he’s absolutely huge and the voice of many of the biggest sporting moments, like all the World Cups. Yes, people love or hate him but everybody knows who he is.”

Commentators in the UK don’t have anywhere near as big a profile. No wonder Guy Mowbray has started doing Gladiators.

Another difference is in the make-up of the post-match chat. Gedra has observed that Brazil’s coverage is less data-orientated than in the UK, although the tone depends on the channel. Globo, the free-to-air channel, have largely monopolised coverage but they are now under threat from newer players such as Sport TV, ESPN and TNT Sports. YouTube channels are also growing.

“I worked for ESPN and I think they got the tone just right, very analytical and not too spectacular or passionate,” Gedra says.

Advertisement

Unspectacular is definitely not a word you would use to describe the stylings of Alexi Lalas, one of the most prominent broadcasters in the U.S., whose brash persona brings a love-it-or-hate-it quality.

He works as an analyst for Fox Sports, has a podcast called Alexi Lalas’ State of the Union and doesn’t care if people like him or not. But his bold, direct and outspoken opinions have made him an influential figure in the U.S. and beyond.

Lalas is another who doesn’t seem to especially like English players, saying during the Euros that Gareth Southgate’s team were “insufferable as they are talented”.

“But I’m in the entertainment business,” Lalas told The Athletic earlier this year. “I am a performer. When you say that, sometimes people cringe. By no means am I saying that I can’t be authentic and genuine. But I recognise the way I say something is as important as what I say.

“When I go on TV, I put on a costume and when that red light goes on, I don’t want people changing the channel.”

Advertisement

Lalas’ audacious approach is a bit of a leap from the English-style NBC coverage that rose to prominence a few years ago. A number of ex-Premier League players headed Stateside and made names for themselves, such as Robbie Earle and Robbie Mustoe — while having decent careers in England, neither was a household name when playing for Wimbledon and Middlesbrough respectively.

go-deeper

GO DEEPER

Access all areas at NBC: Three Premier League games, a Winnebago and tactical sushi

The pair, who have their own podcast called The 2 Robbies, gave NBC’s coverage a familiar feel alongside commentator Arlo White and pundit Lee Dixon, while former Stoke City defender Danny Higginbotham is another face of the channel having moved Stateside. “What we’ve tried to do from the start is talk in a normal way about football,” Earle told The Guardian in 2017. An underrated concept.

Fox Sports also employ recognisable names from UK TV coverage including commentator (sorry, ‘play-by-play announcer’) Ian Darke, former Newcastle defender Warren Barton and ex-Sky Sports reporter Geoff Shreeves. Fox also use Mark Clattenburg as a refereeing analyst.

Undoubtedly the most renowned U.S. soccer coverage, though, is on CBS Sports via its hugely popular Golazo Champions League show, complete with the instantly recognisable line-up of Kate Abdo, Thierry Henry, Micah Richards and Jamie Carragher, whose on-screen chemistry make them a social media staple on every matchday.

Advertisement

Left to right: Kate Abdo, Thierry Henry, Jamie Carragher and Micah Richards have been a hit on CBS (Robbie Jay Barratt – AMA/Getty Images)

Pete Radovich, the coordinating producer of the UEFA Champions League coverage on CBS Sports, told The Athletic in September on how he came to realise that the network’s Champions League Today studio now owns the global conversation on major nights of European football.

“Thierry Henry, in no uncertain terms, says he gets asked more about CBS now than Arsenal,” he said. “That to me is wild.”

The show’s razor-sharp use of social media and its mix of humour, analysis and engaging post-match interviews with managers and players is a winning formula, while most importantly the quartet’s camaraderie feels natural, warm and unforced.

Americans showing the world how to make excellent football soccer coverage? It’s a brave new world.

(Top photos: Getty Images; design: Dan Goldfarb)

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Sports

Former NCAA swimmer Riley Gaines calls out ‘deranged’ co-hosts of ‘The View’ over Capitol Hill bathroom ban

Published

on

Former NCAA swimmer Riley Gaines calls out ‘deranged’ co-hosts of ‘The View’ over Capitol Hill bathroom ban

Former University of Kentucky swimmer Riley Gaines blasted the co-hosts of “The View” on Wednesday, calling them “deranged” and “out of touch” after they spoke out in defense of Delaware Rep.-elect Sarah McBride over a resolution that would ban transgender women from using women’s restrooms at the U.S. Capitol.

Gaines, a 12-time NCAA All-American swimmer who has publicly spoken out against trans inclusion in women’s and girls sports and advocated for protecting women’s spaces, posted a message on X calling out the group for speaking out on an issue that does not directly impact them.

Former competitve swimmer Riley Gaines speaks during a campaign rally for Republican presidential nominee, former U.S. President Donald Trump at Desert Diamond Arena on August 23, 2024, in Glendale, Arizona. The rally, held in partnership with Turning Point PAC and Turning Point Action, came two weeks after Democratic presidential nominee U.S. Vice President Harris held a rally at the same location.  (Rebecca Noble/Getty Images)

“I wonder if the deranged, out-of-touch women on The View would be comfortable letting Mr. McBride change in a locker room inches away from their own daughters,” she wrote in a post on X which accompanied a clip of the show. 

Advertisement

“It never matters until it affects you personally.” 

Gaines competed against former UPenn swimmer Lia Thomas, a transgender athlete, at the NCAA championships in 2022, where she said the NCAA had opted to give Thomas the fifth-place trophy for the “photo op” despite them tying in the women’s 200 freestyle.  

Thomas would go on to win a national title in the women’s 500 freestyle. 

Gaines was responding to a segment of Tuesday’s episode of “The View” where the co-hosts reacted to a resolution by Rep. Nancy Mace, R-S.C., to ban transgender women from using women’s restrooms at the U.S. Capitol in response to McBride, the first openly transgender federal lawmaker set to join Congress in January.

RILEY GAINES REPEATEDLY TEARS INTO AOC FOR TAKING PRONOUNS OUT OF X BIO AFTER ADVOCATING FOR TRANS ATHLETES

Advertisement

“I don’t understand how this is [Mace’s] welcome to someone who is coming to make a difference in the country,” Whoopi Goldberg said.  

Rep.-elect Sarah McBride

Rep.-elect Sarah McBride, D-Del., poses for a photograph after joining other congressional freshmen of the 119th Congress for a group photograph on the steps of the House of Representatives at the U.S. Capitol Building on Nov. 15, 2024 in Washington, D.C. (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

“It’s not a welcome, it’s flipping her the middle finger. Because she is the one person in the House that this will affect,” Sara Haines responded, adding, “And this woman that came and sat at our table is one of the most decent, amazing politicians I’ve ever seen. Her messaging resounded across the boards.”

Alyssa Farah Griffin chimed in, calling the attempt to ban McBride “gross.”

“It is a new member of Congress, who ran as a centrist democrat, talked about issues – pocketbook issues. She said at our table ‘I am not a spokesperson for my community. I’m running to deliver for Delaware.’ And Nancy Mace is trying to goad her into a fight she did not sign up to be part of. She’s trying to pigeonhole her into ‘You have to be this culture warrior, who makes this your whole identity’ purely because Nancy Mace doesn’t like how she chooses to exist.” 

Advertisement
Mace speaks to reporters in Capitol hallway

U.S. Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) arrives for a House Republican caucus meeting at the U.S. Capitol on November 19, 2024, in Washington, DC. Mace introduced legislation that would require House members and staffers from “using single-sex facilities other than those corresponding to their biological sex.”  (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

Gaines said in a separate post on X Wednesday that she would be “happy” to join “The View” for a conversation after disagreeing with Goldberg’s numbers regarding trans athletes competing in public schools. 

Fox News’ Liz Elkind contributed to this report. 

Follow Fox News Digital’s sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Sports

Freddie Freeman grand slam ball to be auctioned. Could bring 'life-changing money' for Venice family

Published

on

Freddie Freeman grand slam ball to be auctioned. Could bring 'life-changing money' for Venice family

The past few weeks have been a whirlwind for Zachary Ruderman.

He’s the 10-year-old Dodgers fan who ended up with one of the most significant baseballs in team history — the one his favorite player, first baseman Freddie Freeman, hit for a walk-off grand slam during the 10th inning in Game 1 of the 2024 World Series against the New York Yankees.

Since then, Zachary has seemingly become one of the most famous people living in Venice.

“It’s a lot more attention than my son has ever had,” his father, Nico Ruderman, said. “He’s spoken to so many media outlets, so many interviews. People recognize him. I mean, literally everywhere we go people stop him and want to take pictures with him. He’s really actually been loving it. It’s been a fun experience for him.”

That experience is entering a new phase. On Wednesday, SCP Auctions announced the ball will be up for bid from Dec. 4-14. Coming just weeks after the Dodgers won their eighth World Series championship — with Freeman hitting four home runs and winning MVP honors, all on a badly sprained ankle — SCP founder and president David Kohler said his company thinks “the sky’s the limit” for what the auction could bring.

Advertisement

“We think this is gonna bring seven figures,” Kohler said. “We think it’s one of the most historic baseballs ever, with the moment of this World Series, the first walk-off grand slam, the whole story of Freddie Freeman, the Dodgers, Game 1, extra innings. Just everything about it. I mean, it’s one of the most historic moments in sports and we feel that people are going to appreciate that.”

Last month, Dodgers superstar Shohei Ohtani’s 50th home run ball was sold by Goldin Auctions for a record $4.4 million. Could the Freeman ball be worth even more than that?

Zachary Ruderman holds up Freddie Freeman’s grand slam ball with his parents, Nico and Anne, at his side.

(Courtesy of Nico Ruderman)

Advertisement

“It could be. You never know,” Kohler said. “We’re gonna find out. Certainly the Ohtani ball was very, very significant and Ohtani is beloved, but this is more of the history of the game of baseball and just the moment — seeing that happen was just incredible.”

Zachary, along with his father and mother Anne, were part of that moment. After Freeman blasted his game-winning shot into the right-field pavilion, the ball rolled next to Zachary’s feet. The fifth-grader batted it over to his father, who pounced on it, stood up and handed it back to his son.

“They’re just amazing memories,” Zachary said Thursday, looking back on that night. “Like after we got it, no one was mad. No one was trying to take it from us. Everyone was just super happy.”

His father added: “We just feel so lucky and honored to be a small part of such a huge moment in Dodger history.”

The experience was so special that at first the family had no intention of parting with the ball.

Advertisement

“That night when we caught it we were like, ‘We’re gonna keep this forever,’” Ruderman said. “The problem is, if we keep it, we’re not gonna keep it in our house. I don’t want to pay for the insurance for it, so it would just be locked up in some safety deposit box. Nobody would ever see it.

Zachary Ruderman holds his Freddie Freeman grand slam ball while posing with L.A. City Councilmember Traci Park at City Hall

Zachary Ruderman holds his Freddie Freeman grand slam ball while posing with L.A. City Councilmember Traci Park at City Hall.

(Nico Ruderman)

“Maybe [the auction] brings life-changing money and pays for education for our son, and also allows somebody with the resources to actually display it and show it to the world. We’re really hoping that whoever buys it agrees to display it at Dodger Stadium for some time so everybody can see it. That’s really our wish.”

Even with all the incredible experiences he’s had because of the ball — including his favorite, speaking in front of Los Angeles City Council at City Hall and receiving a certificate of congratulations from Councilmember Traci Park earlier this month — Zachary said he’s “really excited” about the auction.

Advertisement

“It’s probably going to be a pretty fun experience,” Zachary said.

“We’ve had our fun with the ball,” his father added. “At this point he cares more about the memories, the pictures. He loves reading all the articles and watching all the news stories about it. That’s what’s fun for him, not the item itself.”

Continue Reading

Trending