Connect with us

Sports

How do Premier League teams kick off games in 2024-25?

Published

on

How do Premier League teams kick off games in 2024-25?

Plenty of attention has been paid to the new ‘Dynamic Kick-off’ regulations in American football’s NFL in the early days of its 2024 season but even in the fluid realm of the Premier League, how a team begins play is an increasingly-rehearsed process.

And despite the ongoing evolution in intricate tactics, even the greatest of Johan Cruyff’s disciples seem keen to return the game to its roots by hoofing the ball up the pitch from kick-off. Each of last season’s final top six in the Premier League have done so at some point in their first three matches of 2024-25. However, they have also provided variety in the ways they line their players up, and how quickly they get the ball forward.

Below, The Athletic analyses the kick-off routines used by Manchester City, Arsenal, Liverpool, Aston Villa, Tottenham Hotspur and Chelsea (to start either a game or the second half of one) across the first three weeks of the season ahead of the Premier League’s return this weekend.


Manchester City

As you would expect from a Pep Guardiola team, City’s kick-off routines have been attempts to retain control through short passes and plenty of off-ball movement.

Advertisement

Ahead of their first kick-off of the season away at Chelsea, Kevin De Bruyne and Bernardo Silva both lined up close to the ball, with Savinho out wide on the left and Erling Haaland and Jeremy Doku close to each other on the right. Rico Lewis was the sole defensive member of the team to the left with their other defenders forming the final line behind Mateo Kovacic on the edge of the centre circle.

De Bruyne passed the ball back to goalkeeper Ederson, who went long towards Haaland on the right. He flicked it on, but Chelsea ’keeper Robert Sanchez came off his line to collect the ball close to the edge of the box before Doku could reach it. By the time Sanchez caught the ball, City had seven players close to his penalty box to kickstart the press.

At home against Ipswich Town the following weekend, Guardiola opted for a different approach when City kicked off the second half (they were leading 3-1 by then). De Bruyne and Bernardo still stayed close to the ball, but Haaland joined Savinho out wide on the right while Doku was positioned further inside on the other flank. Lewis, on the right, lined up alongside Kovacic, who stood near the edge of the circle again, while the back three were positioned deeper than they had been at Stamford Bridge.

City began the second half with a 14-pass move in which they found both Savinho and Doku at different points, with seven players in total getting a touch. When Ipswich finally cleared the ball for a throw-in, City had De Bruyne and Bernardo in pockets where they could cause damage and both wingers high and wide with limited immediate pressure.

At West Ham, City chose a similar approach to the Ipswich one before the opening kick-off but with Jack Grealish alone on the left while Haaland and Doku went wide on the right. Their back three were much closer together that time and leaned more towards the left, indicating they would channel their first attack of the match to the right.

Advertisement

De Bruyne again passed all the way back to Ederson, who shaped up for a long pass but then went short to left-back Josko Gvardiol, who returned it to him. City then drew West Ham towards the left with De Bruyne dropping deep, as he did against Ipswich, before playing it out to their right and finding Lewis in acres of space. When Lewis received the ball, he was ahead of six West Ham and five City outfield players, giving the champions a chance to cause some early damage.


Arsenal

Arsenal have had a set pattern in place across their three league games so far, passing the ball back to goalkeeper David Raya from kick-off and surging towards the flanks in numbers while leaving central areas open. Raya is then tasked with hitting one of the wings; he went towards the left against Wolves and Brighton, and to the right against Aston Villa.

In the Wolves game, Arsenal had a front five streaming forward even before Thomas Partey knocked the ball back towards Raya. Bukayo Saka and Martin Odegaard made inward runs on the right anticipating a long ball to the left, where Declan Rice is most central with Gabriel Martinelli holding the width and Kai Havertz between them, while Oleksandr Zinchenko stayed back. Arsenal’s defenders stayed in a high final line to ensure they could move further up once Raya, who came well outside his box, launched the ball forward.

By the time Raya readied himself to kick, William Saliba was the lone defender in the final line with Gabriel and Ben White, who also made their way forward.

Wolves stepped forward to try to win the ball just beyond the halfway line, but it came back to Zinchenko. He played it forward to Martinelli, but the Brazilian’s subsequent pass towards the middle was cleared.

Advertisement

Wolves recovered possession quickly but as Arsenal already had men forward, they pressed them to force a long pass and won the ball back by the 34-second mark.

Away to Villa, Arsenal used a different tactic by opting to go to the right flank instead. Havertz moved over to the right to charge forward with Saka, while Odegaard stayed more central. Rice and Martinelli made more conservative runs on the left while the back four stayed high in line with the edge of the centre circle.

When Partey’s pass got to Raya, Saliba was the furthest behind once again while all the runners moved towards the right. Raya’s long ball was nodded on by Havertz, who occupied the same area as Saka, allowing Villa left-back Lucas Digne to get a head start and marshal the ball out for a goal kick. The move mirrors City’s approach against Chelsea the previous weekend.

Finally, against Brighton, Arsenal went to the left again, with Havertz once more drifting over to the other side. This time, they kept two centre-backs in front of Raya, anticipating a higher Brighton press, with Saliba even blocking opposition striker Danny Welbeck. Raya’s pass was met by Jan Paul van Hecke, who headed it out for a throw-in.

By then, nine Arsenal players were in the Brighton half, allowing the home side to establish early territorial dominance.

Advertisement

Winning the initial header doesn’t seem to be Arsenal’s focus from these routines, particularly considering the 5ft 8in (178cm) Leandro Trossard was their left-winger against Brighton, though Havertz’s 6ft 4in height does help, as it did against Villa. The aim is for them to get as many of their players forward as possible, pinning the opposition back rather than prioritising control.


Liverpool 


Liverpool huddle before kick-off at Manchester United on September 1 (Paul Ellis/AFP via Getty Images)

Arne Slot’s early months as Liverpool head coach have seen him receive praise for establishing an identity that blends the best qualities of Jurgen Klopp’s 2023-24 squad with his own touches.

Liverpool have continued to use a high line and that has been evident from their kick-off setups, which is similar to Arsenal’s.

On the opening weekend against Ipswich, Dominik Szoboszlai was tasked with kicking off the contest, with four team-mates also close to the halfway line.

Unlike City and Arsenal, who have players starting from wide positions, Liverpool were much narrower. Luis Diaz, Diogo Jota and Alexis Mac Allister lined up on the left while Mohamed Salah took up the sole spot on the right. Behind them, Trent Alexander-Arnold inverted to form a midfield line with Ryan Gravenberch, with Liverpool’s remaining defenders forming the final line just beyond the centre circle. Both the first and final lines compressed space by lining up next to each other.

Advertisement

Below, Szoboszlai passed to goalkeeper Alisson, who went long towards the left. Like Haaland and Havertz from the examples above, the ball was directed towards Jota, who was in the half-space rather than wide, which helped him find Diaz further out. The Colombian received support from Andy Robertson and the latter’s first-time cross was cleared.

Slot went one step further in his official Anfield bow against Brentford the following week. To kick off the game’s second half, the front four remained the same but the midfield two became a trio with Robertson inverting to position himself directly behind Jota on the left. Ibrahima Konate and Virgil van Dijk formed the final line right next to the centre circle.

This time around, Alisson’s long pass was met by Brentford defender Nathan Collins, who was then fouled when he went up for a return header after the ball was sent forward again by Robertson. When the foul occurred, every Liverpool outfield player was in Brentford’s half. With the play drawn towards the left, Szoboszlai, Alexander-Arnold and Salah were in space on the right.

Then, against Manchester United, deemed the first big test of Slot’s tenure, the Dutchman unleashed what looked like an even more daring approach to start the second half, despite holding a 2-0 lead at Old Trafford. The front line of four was backed up by a second line of four with Gravenberch, Van Dijk and Robertson on the left and Alexander-Arnold in the half-space on the right. Konate was furthest back but still higher than he had been against Ipswich or Brentford.

However, as Alisson readied himself to launch one upfield, Van Dijk and Robertson dropped back even as their other team-mates made their way forward. Alisson’s pass was met by Jota, who (after a couple of ricochets) got past United right-back Noussair Mazraoui to the byline. Liverpool were unable to get enough men into the box, though, and Jota’s final pass sailed out for a throw-in on the other side of the pitch. They did, however, have enough players in United’s defensive third to disrupt their restart from the ensuing throw-in.

Advertisement

Liverpool’s approach from kick-offs, while mirroring Arsenal’s on the surface, has the positional interchanges we see from City.

Jota and Diaz are both capable of switching between the left-winger and centre-forward positions and this approach also allows Salah to begin halves with lower intensity and conserve his energy.


Aston Villa 

Villa are the first team on this list to start matches off with a forward and use a midfield recipient from kick-off, with an emphasis on control and baiting the opposition’s press.

Away against West Ham on the opening weekend, Morgan Rogers started the second half for Villa with Ollie Watkins and Leon Bailey lining up close to each other on the left and John McGinn tucking inside on the right. Youri Tielemans and Amadou Onana stood right next to each other within the centre circle, while Villa’s back four formed their final line a few yards further back, fanning out to cover the middle of the pitch and both flanks.

Below, Rogers passed the ball to Tielemans, who went back to Pau Torres. As West Ham committed men forward, Villa played it out wide to right-back Matty Cash, who beat his man but then gave the ball away, before Villa won a throw-in in their own half.

Advertisement

Unai Emery’s side were much more conservative when they took on Arsenal at home the following weekend.

This time, Watkins moved to the right, leaving Bailey as the sole runner on the left. Tielemans pushed closer to Rogers while Onana retained his position near the edge of the centre circle. The gap between Onana and the back four was much larger, while the full-backs pushed slightly further ahead of their centre-backs.

Villa passed back to goalkeeper Emiliano Martinez, who, with the team’s overall shape, would have been expected to go towards the left wing. However, Havertz cleverly presses him on that side to force Martinez to pass to the right wing, where Jurrien Timber wins the initial duel but then gives the ball away. From there, Villa worked it back to their defenders before eventually surrendering possession as Arsenal pressure resulted in Torres passing to an offside Bailey.

Against Leicester City in their third match of the season, Emery unleashed another pre-kick-off formation.

This time, Watkins returned to the left alongside McGinn, while Onana moved further up the pitch to join Bailey on the right, so forming a front four. Tielemans stood just a couple of feet away from Rogers to receive the initial ball, while Digne inverted to line up a few yards behind McGinn and Watkins, leaving plenty of space in midfield.

Advertisement

Rogers passed to Tielemans as expected, and he played the ball further back to the defence. Torres tried to dribble out of danger but couldn’t and Leicester cleared it back to their defence before constructing a move that pegged Villa back, indicating the risk this approach holds when Emery’s side fail to wriggle out of pressure.


Tottenham Hotspur

Tottenham’s kick-off setup contrasts with all the teams above in terms of width.

In the example below from their opening fixture against Leicester, Spurs, like Villa, kicked off using a forward in Dominic Solanke, but stationed Son Heung-min and Brennan Johnson extremely wide on the left and right respectively, with James Maddison starting close to Solanke.

Their second line leaned towards the left; Rodrigo Bentancur was on the edge of the centre circle in midfield with Pedro Porro in the right half-space and Pape Sarr in between them. Destiny Udogie was slightly behind in the left half-space, leaving just centre-backs Cristian Romero and Micky van de Ven to form the final line closer to their penalty area than to their team-mates. Romero and Van de Ven then fanned out, hinting that Spurs would start with short passes, which was what they did.

Solanke passed the ball to Bentancur, who played a one-two with Sarr before finding Van de Ven. Spurs worked the ball to Maddison, dropping deep on the left flank (similar to De Bruyne for City), and he tried to find Udogie, whose poke forward was too far ahead for Solanke to reach.

Advertisement

With Solanke out injured against Everton, Spurs brought Wilson Odobert into their line-up, while Dejan Kulusevski also started.

As Son, as the centre-forward, prepared for kick-off, he had two options close to him in Maddison and Kulusevski, while Johnson and Odobert held the width once again. The second line was formed by Porro drifting into central midfield, the returning Yves Bissouma at the edge of the centre circle and Udogie much wider on the left. Romero and Van de Ven formed the final line but were higher up the pitch than against Leicester, a signal they anticipated less pressure from the outset than in Leicester.

Son found Bissouma with the first pass and the midfielder went long, towards Odobert on the left. Odobert won the second ball and fed Maddison, but Spurs ended up going back to their defence, still staying within Everton’s half as the visitors sat deep.

In the most recent match, against Newcastle, Spurs used yet another kick-off shape as they began the second half 1-0 down.

As Son prepared to make the opening pass, Johnson again positioned himself wide on the right, but Udogie was now the widest player on the other flank with Odobert dropping inside, while Kulusevski was deeper than where he was positioned in the Everton match. Porro also pushed up to man the right side of the second line, with Maddison in a deeper position down the middle and Bissouma on the left. The gap between midfield and their two-man defensive line was smaller as Spurs aimed to push forward from the start of the half in search of an equaliser.

Advertisement

On this occasion, Son played it to Kulusevski, who lofted a ball towards Udogie on the left — as Bissouma did for Odobert against Everton. The pass was too heavy and Newcastle won it back, but as Spurs pushed men forward, they regained possession quickly. The resulting sequence saw Kulusevski’s shot from inside the box deflected.

Spurs’ system under coach Ange Postecoglou has often depended on high-risk, high-energy football and their kick-offs are a good illustration of that. Their setup allows them to stream men forward and, more importantly, compress the wide areas to force teams down the middle, where they can win the ball back by applying pressure.


Chelsea

Chelsea’s kick-off approach under new head coach Enzo Maresca is quite different from their approach with Mauricio Pochettino in the dugout last season.

Instead of Conor Gallagher, sold to Atletico Madrid in the summer, or another midfielder, Nicolas Jackson has been handed kick-off duties by Maresca. Chelsea have used a mix of Spurs’ and City’s approaches, stationing their left-winger out wide while allowing Cole Palmer on the right to stay closer to Jackson.

Against City on the opening weekend, Enzo Fernandez gave Jackson a short initial option on the left, with Moises Caicedo and Romeo Lavia on the edge of the centre circle. Chelsea’s back four stayed closer to their box with Malo Gusto and Marc Cucurella inverting from the right and left, respectively.

Advertisement

To start the second half, trailing 1-0, Jackson passed to Cucurella, who tried to go long towards Christopher Nkunku wide on the left, but the pass was too heavy, and City saw it through to Ederson with minimal pressure. Given the quality of the opposition, Chelsea didn’t press too high, granting City’s back three the space and time to get into a passing rhythm.

Chelsea’s approach seemed to be a reaction to playing a superior side in the four-in-a-row champions, however, as they changed their setup away against Wolves the following weekend.

The inclusion of Noni Madueke and Lavia’s absence through injury meant, in addition to having Palmer close to Jackson, Maresca could station both wingers — Mykhailo Mudryk on the left and Madueke on the right — out wide. Gusto joined the midfield to form a trio with Fernandez and Caicedo, which meant the right-back area was completely empty, with Cucurella inverting and pushing ahead and the centre-backs staying close to each other in the middle.

This time, Jackson passed to right centre-back Wesley Fofana, who immediately went long towards Madueke. The winger was open and flicked the ball on towards Palmer, but Wolves skipper Mario Lemina got there first. As Wolves then tried to move forward, Chelsea pressed high to force the opposition to the left, trying to tempt them into a risky switch which never came.

The setup Maresca used against Crystal Palace in the third match might be the one he sticks with as the Chelsea squad get accustomed to his tactics.

Advertisement

Chelsea, winning 1-0, kicked off the second half with Fernandez, who had Jackson (left) and Palmer (right) closest to him while Pedro Neto hugged the touchline on the left and Madueke was stationed wide right. Gusto and Caicedo formed a much deeper second line, with Cucurella wider than in previous matches. The centre-backs were also deeper than before, staying closer to their penalty area.

Fernandez passed the ball back to Sanchez, who, under no pressure, lofted the ball towards the left. Chelsea failed to win the first header and Fernandez’s second header towards Neto was cleared out. When the ball went out of play, Chelsea had Palmer, their primary creative outlet, in the kind of position they would want him, but their rest defence was slightly vulnerable with Caicedo moving up the pitch.


Space and time may have limited us to a deep dive on only last season’s top six in this article but fans of Bournemouth, Brighton, Newcastle and Manchester United can analyse their team’s kick-off approach in the graphics below:

Sports

Florida AG launches civil rights investigation into MLB’s warning to Christian pitchers over Pride Night caps

Published

on

Florida AG launches civil rights investigation into MLB’s warning to Christian pitchers over Pride Night caps

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

The attorneys general from Missouri and Florida have reacted strongly to the controversy stirred when Major League Baseball warned three San Francisco Giants players about inscribing a Bible verse on their Pride Night caps, and that reaction includes MLB being served with a subpoena that signals the launch of an official investigation.

Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier launched his investigation on Friday by serving MLB with a subpoena to investigate whether it is violating the civil rights of players based on their religious beliefs.

The general purpose and scope of Florida’s investigation “extend(s) to possible civil rights and deceptive and unfair trade practices violations in matters of employment concerning the business practices, policies, and procedures of Major League Baseball,” per the subpoena obtained by Fox News Digital.

In a letter from Uthmeier to MLB Commissioner Robert Manfred, the AG warns that “a pattern or practice of selectively enforcing its rules to benefit favored secular beliefs over disfavored religious beliefs would not only potentially violate Florida civil rights law, but it would also violate the League’s own policies.

Advertisement

MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL FACES BACKLASH FOR ITS STANCE ON CHRISTIANS WRITING BIBLE VERSES ON PRIDE CAPS

“And a practice of claiming not to discriminate based on religion while discriminating based on religion could further amount to an unfair or deceptive trade practice in violation of the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act.”

Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier speaks at a news conference in Orlando on July 15, 2025, where he said U.S. Masters Swimming should not allow transgender athletes to compete against women swimmers or face legal action. Advocates Cassidy Carlisle and Lainey Armistead also attended. (Rich Pope/Orlando Sentinel/Tribune News Service)

Uthmeier is particularly troubled by the fact MLB said its warning had nothing to do with the players’ religious beliefs but rather was strictly because of a violation of the league’s uniform code.

It should be noted MLB said in a follow-up statement to its initial warning to the players that it was merely enforcing its uniform codes and the warning had nothing to do with Giants pitchers Landen Roupp, JT Brubaker and Ryan Walker writing a Bible verse on the team’s Pride Night Cap most of the other players wore.

Advertisement

MLB ACCUSED OF ‘DOUBLE STANDARD’ AFTER CALLING OUT PLAYERS’ BIBLE MESSAGES DESPITE BACKING BLM IN 2020

Uthmeier noted that doesn’t ring true and presented in his letter a handful of examples where MLB has been absolutely fine with players adding to their uniform.

“In 2019, for example, a Cincinnati Reds player wrote on his cap in tribute to a nearby mass shooting,” Uthmeier wrote to Manfred. “And in 2020, MLB evidently added new, sweeping exceptions to its uniform rules by allowing players to ‘support social justice and diversity and inclusion.’ These policy changes included permitting players to add Black Lives Matter patches to their sleeves.

“MLB therefore appears to applaud — even change its rules for — the ideological beliefs it prefers, but targets players who express religious views the League doesn’t like.”

Commissioner of Major League Baseball Robert D. Manfred Jr. speaks at the 2024 MLB Draft presented by Nike at Cowtown Coliseum in Fort Worth, Texas, on July 14, 2024. (Daniel Shirey/MLB Photos via Getty Images)

Advertisement

The Florida subpoena, issued under the Florida Civil Rights Act, demands action from MLB on July 23, 2026, at 9 a.m.. At that time, MLB must deliver to the AG’s office documents including:

  • All documents concerning how MLB characterized or classified the June 2026 cap writing, including, for example, whether MLB treated it as religious expression, political messaging, protest, or a violation unrelated to its content.
  • All documents concerning what prompted MLB’s review of and warning regarding the June 2026 cap writing, including any complaint, media inquiry, internal escalation, or third-party communication received before the warning issued, and the timing of each relative to the warning.
  • All documents concerning the actual June 2026 warnings issued by the MLB to any club.
  • All documents, including drafts and internal deliberations, concerning MLB’s decision to issue and publicly announce the June 2026 warnings, and any analysis of whether doing so adhered to the Code or with MLB’s treatment of comparable non-religious expression.

San Francisco Giants pitcher Landen Roupp wrote “Genesis 9:12-16” on his Pride-Night themed hat. (Thearon W. Henderson/Getty Images)

Uthmeier is thus joining Missouri Attorney General Catherine Hanaway, who recently wrote a letter to Manfred asking the commissioner to confirm that no player who has chosen to refrain from “wearing Pride Month paraphernalia or included Bible verses on Pride Month hats” will not be disciplined in any way.

Hanaway’s letter states that if Manfred fails to answer by June 25 or does not confirm that no discipline will be levied, she too will open an investigation of MLB.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

The two attorneys general have authority over their individual states. But it affects four MLB teams.

Advertisement

Florida is home to two MLB teams — the Tampa Bay Rays and Miami Marlins — while Missouri is home to the St. Louis Cardinals and Kansas City Royals.

FOLLOW ARMANDO SALGUERO ON X: @ARMANDOSALGUERO

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Sports

Commentary: Why MLB’s Pride Night cap condemnation isn’t the anti-Christian crackdown conservatives claim

Published

on

Commentary: Why MLB’s Pride Night cap condemnation isn’t the anti-Christian crackdown conservatives claim

Amid the first days of grief after Alex Vesia and his wife lost their newborn daughter last fall, Vesia noticed something as he watched the World Series on television. He paused the broadcast, then checked the video, then texted another player to make sure.

51.

Dodgers teammates wore his number on their caps. So did players from the Toronto Blue Jays.

“It was awesome,” Vesia said. “It was a very heartwarming moment.”

Moving.

Advertisement

Touching.

And, under baseball’s rules, illegal.

Who knew, really, until this week? Three pitchers from the San Francisco Giants wrote the name of a Bible verse on their Pride Night caps and, amid an uproar, Major League Baseball said it had warned the players that “writing of any kind, with any message” on any playing apparel is not permitted. The issue, the league said in a statement, was not what they wrote on their caps but simply that they wrote on them at all.

Said MLB in the statement: “We have given the same warning numerous times in the past to players for messages such as ‘Dad’, ‘Happy Mother’s Day, I Love Mom’ and names of family members.”

To its credit, the league did not enforce the rule when Vesia’s number started appearing on caps in the World Series. But, if you’re going to draw a line on enforcement, where should you draw it?

Advertisement

In San Francisco, the actions of the Giants’ pitchers were widely condemned.

“They were in for a rude awakening with the response, and it wasn’t just from the gay community,” Giants broadcaster and former pitcher Mike Krukow told KNBR, the team’s flagship radio station. “It was from the Northern California community that supports the gay community.”

In response to media inquiries, and as first reported by Outsports, MLB confirmed it had warned the three players. I asked the league whether warnings had been issued in two other instances in which players had written on their caps, including Clayton Kershaw last year writing the same Bible verse on his Pride Night cap that the Giants’ pitchers wrote this year. MLB declined to comment.

“I got chastised by the league when I put Charlie [Kirk]’s name on my hat last year, because a man was murdered in cold blood,” Dodgers pitcher Blake Treinen told me, “and now these gentlemen who are relievers in San Francisco are getting chastised by the league for putting a Bible verse on their hat. It’s crazy to me.”

Treinen said league officials had told him the rule is strictly enforced.

Advertisement

“I straight up asked Clayton last year, ‘Did they call you when you put that on your hat?’” Treinen said. “He said, ‘No.’”

The Pride caps feature team logos decorated in the colors of the rainbow, a symbol long associated with the gay community. In the Bible verse cited by the pitchers (Genesis 9:12-16), the rainbow represents “the everlasting covenant between God and all living creatures.”

That the league would warn players against writing a Bible verse on their caps ignited a wave of conservative outrage, from Vice President JD Vance to Texas Gov. Greg Abbott.

Missouri Sen. Josh Hawley fired off a letter to MLB commissioner Rob Manfred, alleging apparent discrimination “against baseball players who profess their Christian faith” and threatening the league’s antitrust exemption. Assistant U.S. Atty. Gen. Harmeet Dhillon said on national television that players might be able to file a claim for employment discrimination.

That is complete nonsense. This is what you want: When employees raise an issue to their employer, the employer listens and addresses their concerns.

Advertisement

In 2023, the year after five Tampa Bay Rays players declined to wear rainbow logos for Pride Night, Manfred said the league would no longer compel players to do so.

“We have told teams, in terms of actual uniforms, hats, bases that we don’t think putting logos on them is a good idea just because of the desire to protect players: not putting them in a position of doing something that may make them uncomfortable because of their personal views,” Manfred said then.

Teammates congratulate Freddie Freeman after his walk-off home run gave the Dodgers a 1-0 win on June 5, when the Dodgers held their annual Pride Night. Blake Treinen, the winning pitcher that night, elected to wear his regular Dodgers cap instead of the Pride version.

(Katelyn Mulcahy / Getty Images)

Advertisement

Manfred said the Pride Night celebrations could go on, however a team wished to stage them — or not, in the case of the Texas Rangers, the only one of the 30 MLB teams that declines to hold a Pride Night. And the league still sells Pride gear on its website for all teams, including the Rangers.

In the cases of the Giants and Dodgers, MLB grandfathered each team’s long-running use of a rainbow logo on the cap, with this accommodation to players: If you don’t feel comfortable wearing the Pride cap, just wear your regular cap.

That is what Treinen and outfielder Alex Call did when the Dodgers celebrated Pride Night. That is also what a fourth Giants pitcher did.

“My job is to abide by the rules,” Treinen said. “Ultimately, the only rule we have is to wear our team-issued uniform. So that’s what I chose to do.”

To Treinen, the decision over whether to wear a Pride cap is not about passing judgment on anyone else but about what he sees as the push “to force something on people that you know that is controversial to their faith — and, in fact, straight up against their faith.”

Advertisement

He expressed his support for the Giants pitchers.

“Kudos to those men over there who are standing strong in their faith,” he said. “It’s a sad thing to corner someone and try to make them feel bad about their convictions.”

I respect Treinen for explaining his viewpoint. To me, wearing a Pride cap for one night does not diminish your faith at all. It might sharpen your convictions. More important, it signals a welcome to everyone in the community that buys the tickets and broadcast subscriptions that help pay your salary.

“I think a few people made it about themselves and not about the community,” San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie told the Bay Area Reporter.

We always proclaim the life lessons of sports. One of them: Sometimes you have to put the team’s interests ahead of your own.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Sports

2026 World Cup Odds: How Far Can Mexico Go After Winning Group A?

Published

on

2026 World Cup Odds: How Far Can Mexico Go After Winning Group A?

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

After its massive 1-0 win over South Korea on Thursday night, Mexico has won Group A and officially clinched a spot in the knockout round. 

El Tri will play its Round of 32 game in Mexico City, and will face the third-place finisher in either Group C/E/F/H/I.

This is the fourth time that Mexico has topped the group stage of a World Cup, with the other three coming in 1986, 1994 and 2002. 

With the win, Mexico remains unbeaten in World Cup group games at home, going a combined 6-2-0 (W-D-L), with two wins and a draw in 1970 and 1986, and now two wins in 2026. 

Advertisement

Before the tournament began, Mexico was listed at +6500 to win the World Cup. Now, after winning its first two games of the tournament, Mexico has surged up the oddsboard to +5000. 

Can Mexico build off its first two matches and make a deep run in this tournament? Let’s check out the updated odds for El Tri as of June 19.

This page may contain affiliate links to legal sports betting partners. If you sign up or place a wager, FOX Sports may be compensated. Read more about Sports Betting on FOX Sports.

Team Mexico — Stage of Elimination

Last 32: +125 (bet $10 to win $22.50 total)
Last 16: +135 (bet $10 to win $23.50 total)
Quarterfinals: +600 (bet $10 to win $70 total)
Semifinals: +1600 (bet $10 to win $170 total)
Runner-up: +3000 (bet $10 to win $310 total)
Outright winner: +5000 (bet $10 to win $510 total)

Advertisement

Mexico is currently +5000 to win the 2026 FIFA World Cup after winning Group A (Getty Images).

Mexico’s Past World Cup Results:

1930: Group stage
1934: Did not qualify
1938: Withdrew
1950: Group stage
1954: Group stage
1958: Group stage
1962: Group stage
1966: Group stage
1970: Quarterfinals
1974: Did not qualify
1978: Group stage
1982: Did not qualify
1986: Quarterfinals
1990: Banned
1994: Round of 16
1998: Round of 16
2002: Round of 16
2006: Round of 16
2010: Round of 16
2014: Round of 16
2018: Round of 16
2022: Group stage
2026: TBD

What to know: Mexico has made a habit of being in the running, but never really being in the running. Make sense? Consider this: El Tri made it out of the group stage in seven consecutive World Cups (1994-2018), but never made it past the Round of 16 in any of those years. In 2022, Mexico failed to make it out of the group stage, and it will look to get back to its winning ways in 2026 after a great start to the tournament. With its win Thursday night, Mexico has now advanced to the knockout stage in eight of the last nine World Cups. It is important to note, however, that Mexico has never made it past the quarterfinals at a FIFA men’s World Cup.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending