Connect with us

Sports

Barbora Krejcikova criticizes ‘unprofessional’ commentary, Daniil Medvedev spirals in Turin

Published

on

Barbora Krejcikova criticizes ‘unprofessional’ commentary, Daniil Medvedev spirals in Turin

Welcome back to the Monday Tennis Briefing, where The Athletic will explain the stories behind the stories from the past week on court.

This week, the first Riyadh edition of the WTA Tour Finals concluded in Saudi Arabia, with Coco Gauff defeating Zheng Qinwen in the final.

Throughout the week, the players and WTA chief executive Portia Archer have emphasized that they felt welcome and looked after in a country that criminalizes same-sex relationships and has been criticized for its human rights record, particularly regarding women. “We have never had any issues with freedom of expression,” Archer said in a news conference ahead of the tournament.

Charlie Eccleshare’s special report from Riyadh looks at the idea of tennis — and sport at large — having the power to effect change, and how conversant that idea is with the reality in the country:

GO DEEPER

Advertisement

‘The same people who allow women to play tennis are also torturing the activists’

Elsewhere, Barbora Krejcikova criticized what she called “unprofessional” commentary of the event, Danielle Collins and Daria Kasatkina experienced life as an alternate, a doubles partnership fell at the last and Daniil Medvedev spiralled in Turin.

If you’d like to follow our fantastic tennis coverage, click here.


What led Krejcikova to call out a commentator?

After a rough run of form through fall, world No. 10 Barbora Krejcikova got a dose of the social media abuse that is dispiritingly familiar to any tennis player who is losing matches. When someone wondered out loud on X as to how she had won Wimbledon, the Czech gave a straightforward answer: “I won seven matches in a row.”

Krejcikova, who, with that title qualified for the WTA Tour Finals — a special provision for a Grand Slam champion who finishes outside the top eight in the rankings ‘race’ but inside the top 20 — applied that logic to the event in Riyadh. After going 5-5 between Wimbledon and the start of the tournament, she took Iga Swiatek to three sets, eased past Jessica Pegula, and then beat Coco Gauff to win her group.

Advertisement

Krejcikova ran out of steam in the semifinals against Zheng, then found herself having to respond to some more unfavorable commentary of a completely different kind.

“You might have heard about the recent comments made on Tennis Channel during the WTA Finals coverage that focused on my appearance rather than my performance. As an athlete who has dedicated herself to this sport, it was disappointing to see this type of unprofessional commentary,” the 28-year-old wrote in a statement on X.

“This isn’t the first time something like this is happening in sports world. I’ve often chosen not to speak up, but I believe it’s time to address the need for respect and professionalism in sports media. These moments distract from the true essence of sport and the dedication all athletes bring to the field.

I love tennis deeply, and I want to see it represented in a way that honors the commitment we make to compete at this level.”

go-deeper

GO DEEPER

A smiling ghost of Centre Court: How Barbora Krejcikova’s title met her mentor’s legacy

Advertisement

Krejcikova was responding to journalist and commentator Jon Wertheim, who commented on Krejcikova’s forehead during a broadcast on Tennis Channel Friday. Wertheim is a longstanding tennis journalist and is a regular contributor to Andy Roddick’s podcast, Served, which also airs on Tennis Channel’s T2 broadcast.

Wertheim apologized Sunday in a statement on X, which he labelled “a tennis twitter apology.”

“During a Tennis Channel studio show on Friday, I made some deeply regrettable comments off-air. I acknowledge them. I apologise for them. I reached out immediately and apologised to the player,” he said.

“What happened? I joined the show by Zoom. In rehearsal we were shown a graphic of a player who had just competed. It showed her at an angle that exaggerated her forehead.

Advertisement

“A few moments later, I was told to frame up my Zoom. I looked at the low camera angle and joked that it made my forehead resemble the photo of the player in question. Someone in the control room chimed in and I bantered back. Though this was a private rehearsal, this exchange inadvertently, and without context, made it to live air.

“I realize: I am not the victim here. It was neither professional nor charitable nor reflective of the person I strive to be. I am accountable. I own this. I am sorry.”

He later issued a further joint apology with Roddick, shared on Served’s X account.

Wertheim told The Athletic via email that: “Between the statement I posted and some remarks I made with Andy Roddick I don’t have much to add about this deeply regrettable situation for which I am profoundly apologetic.”

Advertisement

In a statement issued Sunday, Tennis Channel said that Wertheim has been removed from the air “indefinitely.”

James Hansen


What caused Daniil Medvedev to lose control at the ATP Finals?

Daniil Medvedev is one of two men’s players born in the 1990s to win a Grand Slam title. He is world No. 4, a constant factor in the latter stages of the biggest events, and one of the most compelling speakers on the ATP Tour.

He’s also in a bad spot. His right shoulder has been bothering him all year, afflicting his serve, which ordinarily lets him explode through his service games to put pressure on his opponents. He’s having to play Jannik Sinner so often that their appearing in the same side of a tournament draw has become a meme, and he isn’t winning at the moment. He thinks the balls used on the tour are neutralizing his strengths and helping those of Sinner and Carlos Alcaraz, the players who can accelerate through slower balls enough to finish points with most aplomb.

At the ATP Tour Finals in Turin, he had had enough, both on-court and off. “I have this every day, day in, day out, since two, three years. Every practice is a struggle. Every match is a struggle. I was holding for long time. Now I feel zero pleasure of being on the court,” he said in a news conference after losing in straight sets to Taylor Fritz on November 10.

Advertisement

Daniil Medvedev has had a testing 12 months (Antonio Calanni / Associated Press)

That lack of pleasure devolved into the absurd, with Medvedev throwing his racket into the air, feigning that he could not hang on to it, and preparing to return serve with his racket handle after Fritz shanked a lucky lob onto the baseline to break in the second set. Medvedev, who is known for his ability to up the frequency of long rallies in return games and steal the marginal advantage it offers the returner against the server, said his fight had left him.

“I’m tired to fight against something that doesn’t depend on myself,” he said, referring to the balls.

“Every match I come, I know that basically I have to hit whatever. It doesn’t matter. Tactics matter less,” he said.

Medvedev will face Alex de Minaur and then Sinner as he bids to qualify for the semifinals. He isn’t all that bothered if this is the end of his season.

James Hansen

Advertisement

What’s it like to be an alternate?

It was a tale of two alternates at the WTA Finals last week — one who got to play and one who didn’t.

In one of tennis’ strangest roles, it is reserved for the end-of-year finals on the men’s and women’s tours. The two players ranked just below the cut-off to qualify for the WTA and ATP Tour Finals are selected as substitutes in case one of the players who has qualified has to pull out. Withdrawals are more common at these events: they are the last major tournaments of the season aside from the Davis Cup and Billie Jean King Cup. They are also played to a round-robin format, so there is the possibility for dead rubbers that players are more willing to pull out of if not feeling 100 percent.

At the WTA Finals the two alternates were Daria Kasatkina of Russia and America’s Danielle Collins. Kasatkina as the world No. 9 was the first alternate and was duly called off the bench when Pegula pulled out with a knee injury on Wednesday after losing her first two matches. Kasatkina’s reward was a match against world No. 2 Iga Swiatek with only a day’s notice. She lost 6-1, 6-0 in 51 minutes.

Afterwards, a shellshocked Kasatkina spoke of the challenge of the alternate role.

“It’s more difficult than it seems. You have to be here for a week, and then suddenly you have to go and play No 2 in the world who already played two matches.

Advertisement

“It’s not easy to go and play from zero, being relaxed the whole week, not being in this mentality as when you play a tournament and then going to play Iga,” she said in a news conference.


Daria Kasatkina won just one game in her appearance at the WTA Tour Finals (Yuichi Yamazaki / AFP via Getty Images)

Collins probably got the better deal as a non-playing alternate. She was a late call-up after Emma Navarro — who would have been the first alternate — withdrew with illness. Collins saw the week as a chance to get into shape for the Billie Jean King Cup finals, which begins on Wednesday.

Collins, who has not played a match in more than two months, said she hoped her role as an alternate would be a good bridge to playing competitively again at the BJK Cup. “It’s been really nice,” she told The Athletic in an interview in Riyadh. “It’s a great opportunity to get back into tournament mode and and and get a lot of great practice, too, with all these players.”

On the day she spoke to The Athletic, Collins played a practice set with Kasatkina and said that she was essentially in her tournament routine — just without playing the matches.

Perhaps the strangest alternate role is reserved for the beaten semifinalists. Krejcikova and Aryna Sabalenka were required to stick around to ensure the final would go ahead if one of Zheng Qinwen or Gauff withdrew. Leaving early carried a fine of half their prize money from the tournament.

Advertisement

This week it’s Grigor Dimitrov and Stefanos Tsitsipas in the alternate roles, at the ATP Finals in Turin. Waiting and wondering if they’ll get the chance to step in for someone. Even if they don’t, they’ll pick up a $155,000 (£120,317) cheque for their efforts — $140,000 (£108,661) was the alternate rate in Riyadh.

Charlie Eccleshare


So close but so far for Taylor Townsend and Katerina Siniakova?

Last week, as Sabalenka became year-end world No. 1 in singles for the first time, Katerina Siniakova achieved the same feat in doubles — for the fourth time.

Siniakova won two Grand Slam titles in 2024: the French Open with Gauff and Wimbledon with Taylor Townsend, who partnered her at the Tour Finals in Riyadh. She also won Olympic gold in mixed doubles for the Czech Republic with Tomas Machac.

Siniakova and Townsend were seeded eighth out of eight pairs in Riyadh despite being widely considered as favorites alongside Gabriela Dabrowski and Erin Routliffe, the Canadian and Kiwi duo who Siniakova and Townsend defeated in the Wimbledon final in July.

Advertisement

Both pairs stormed to the Riyadh final undefeated, with Siniakova and Townsend beating Australian Open champions Hsieh Su-Wei and Elise Mertens and U.S. Open champions Jelena Ostapenko and Lyudmyla Kichenok in the group stage. After four resplendent performances, Dabrowski and Routliffe proved a bridge too far, winning in straight sets 7-5, 6-3 and lifting Dabrowski to No 3 in the world, behind Routliffe in No 2. Townsend moved up from No 9 to No 5.

Despite this defeat, Siniakova, who has been outspoken about the lack of recognition for elite doubles players compared to their singles counterparts, stands alone at the top.


Erin Routliffe (front right) and Gabriela Dabrowski celebrate victory over Katerina Siniakova (top right) and Taylor Townsend in Riyadh (Clive Brunskill / Getty Images)

James Hansen


A long wait for Denis Shapovalov?

After a five-year wait, Denis Shapovalov finally has his hands on an ATP title again — coming all the way through qualifying to claim the Belgrade Open on Sunday.

It was the Canadian’s first title since his maiden victory at the Stockholm Open in 2019, and especially significant given he was out between July 2023 and January 2024 because of a knee injury. This title lifts him 22 places to No 56 in the rankings, an important step towards the spot in the top 30 that he had before that knee injury last summer, and one that would make him seeded at the Slams (and certainly not have to qualify for 250-level events).

Advertisement

Denis Shapovalov is still just 25 despite being a mainstay on the ATP Tour (Darko Vojinovic / Associated Press)

Such a stylish player with a flashing single-handed backhand, it’s good news for fans of variety to have Shapovalov as a factor again, and this title was made even more special by the man handing over the trophy: the 24-time Grand Slam champion Novak Djokovic.

Shapovalov said how honored he was by Djokovic’s presence after his 6-4, 6-4 win over another Serbian, Hamad Medjedovic.

It was super weird, because he’s normally taking trophies from us, not giving us trophies,” he said.

Next up for Shapovalov is the Davis Cup finals with Canada, which begin in Malaga a week on Tuesday. All of a sudden it feels like he could have a significant role to play.

Charlie Eccleshare

Advertisement

Shot(s) of the week

When doubles is good, it’s very, very good.


Recommended reading:


🏆 The winners of the week

🎾 ATP: 

🏆 Denis Shapovalov (Q) def. Hamad Medjedovic (WC) 6-4, 6-4 to win the Belgrade Open (250) in Belgrade, Serbia. It is the Canadian’s second ATP Tour title.
🏆 Benjamin Bonzi (Q) def. Cameron Norrie 7-6(6), 6-4 to win the Moselle Open (250) in Metz, France. It is the Frenchman’s first ATP Tour title.

🎾 WTA:

🏆 Coco Gauff (3) def. Zheng Qinwen (7) 3-6, 6-4, 7-6(2) to win the WTA Tour Finals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. It is the American’s ninth WTA Tour singles title.
🏆 Gabriela Dabrowski / Erin Routliffe (2) def. Taylor Townsend / Katerina Siniakova (8) 7-5, 6-3 to win the WTA Tour Finals in Riyadh. It is the duo’s second WTA Tour title.

Advertisement

📈📉 On the rise / Down the line

📈 Zheng Qinwen moves up two places from No. 7 to No. 5 — a new career high — after her run to the WTA Tour Finals final in Riyadh.
📈 Denis Shapovalov ascends 22 spots from No. 78 to No. 56 after winning the title in Belgrade.
📈 Barbora Krejcikova reenters the top 10 after rising three spots from No. 13 to No. 10 following her run to the semifinals in Riyadh.

📉 Adrian Mannarino falls 14 places from No. 54 to No. 68 after dropping his points from winning the 2023 Sofia Open in Bulgaria.
📉 In an illustration of how bunched players are further down the rankings, Ann Li drops six places for the loss of just 16 points, from No. 93 to No. 99.
📉 Novak Djokovic falls one spot from No. 5 to No. 6 after dropping his 1,300 points from last year’s ATP Tour Finals.


📅 Coming up

🎾 ATP 

📍November 10 – 17 in Turin, Italy: ATP Tour Finals featuring Jannik Sinner, Alexander Zverev, Carlos Alcaraz, Daniil Medvedev.

📺 UK: Sky Sports; U.S.: Tennis Channel 💻 Tennis TV

Advertisement

🎾 WTA

📍November 13 – 20 in Malaga, Spain: Billie Jean King Cup featuring Iga Swiatek, Danielle Collins, Emma Raducanu, Karolina Muchova.

📺 UK: BBC (for Great Britain ties); U.S.: Tennis Channel

Tell us what you noticed this week in the comments below as the men’s and women’s tours continue.

(Top photo: Getty Images; design: Eamonn Dalton)

Advertisement

Sports

'Sopranos' star says she wanted to 'go after' 76ers' Joel Embiid for elbowing Knicks guard during playoff game

Published

on

'Sopranos' star says she wanted to 'go after' 76ers' Joel Embiid for elbowing Knicks guard during playoff game

Don’t mess with Carmela Soprano.

Edie Falco, the actress who played the wife of Tony Soprano on the acclaimed HBO series “The Sopranos,” revealed in an interview with New York Knicks stars Jalen Brunson and Josh Hart that she was really upset with Philadelphia 76ers center Joel Embiid during the playoffs.

Edie Falco as Carmela Soprano in “The Sopranos.” (HBO)

Falco said she was about to go after Embiid after the big man elbowed Brunson in the first round of the playoffs last season.

Advertisement

“Joel Embiid, he’s mean,” Falco said in the latest episode of  the “Roommates Show.” “He like elbowed you in a game last year and I was going to go after him. I mean that’s how bad it was. And then I think I’ve seen you guys play since then and you guys are all like cool with each other. I’m like, ‘You don’t hold a grudge?’”

KNICKS’ MIKAL BRIDGES OUTDUELS SPURS’ VICTOR WEMBANYAMA; KNICKS HOLD ON FOR NARROW VICTORY

Jalen Brunson drives

New York Knicks guard Jalen Brunson in action against the 76ers during the NBA playoffs at the Wells Fargo Center in Philadelphia, May 2, 2024. (Bill Streicher-USA Today Sports)

Brunson said he’s known Embiid since they came into the league and made clear that it wasn’t cool of him to throw the elbow, but whatever ill will there was between them at the time of the heated moment was gone.

The Knicks got the last laugh anyway, as they defeated the 76ers in the first round and eventually lost to the Indiana Pacers in the playoffs.

Jalen Brunson celebrates

New York Knicks guard Jalen Brunson after scoring against the Sixers during the NBA playoffs at the Wells Fargo Center in Philadelphia, April 28, 2024. (Bill Streicher-USA Today Sports)

Advertisement

Falco is long removed from her “Sopranos” days. She’s set for a “Nurse Jackie” sequel on Amazon Prime Video.

Follow Fox News Digital’s sports coverage on X and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Sports

Joan Benoit Samuelson's 1984 Olympic marathon win was a game-changer for women's sports

Published

on

Joan Benoit Samuelson's 1984 Olympic marathon win was a game-changer for women's sports

As Joan Benoit Samuelson negotiated the hairpin turn into the Coliseum tunnel, ran past the USC locker room and onto the stadium’s red synthetic track for the final 400 meters of the 1984 Olympic marathon, her focus wasn’t only on finishing, but on finishing strong.

Women never had been allowed to run farther than 1,500 meters in the Olympics because the Games’ all-male guardians long harbored antiquated views of femininity and what the female body could do. If Samuelson struggled to the line, or worse yet dropped to the ground after crossing it, that would validate those views and set back for years the fight for gender equality in the Olympics.

“They might have taken the Olympic marathon off the schedule,” Samuelson said by phone two days before Thanksgiving. “This is an elite athlete struggling to finish a marathon. It never happened, thank goodness. But that could have changed the course of history for women’s marathoning.”

Actually, that race did change the course of history because nothing remained the same after a joyous Samuelson, wearing a wide smile and waving her white cap to the sold-out crowd, crossed the finish line. This year marked the 40th anniversary of that victory, and when the Olympics return to Los Angeles in four years, the Games will be different in many ways because of it.

Joan Benoit celebrates on the top step of the podium after winning gold in the women’s marathon at the L.A. Olympic Games on Aug. 5, 1984.

Advertisement

(Lenny Ignelzi / Associated Press)

Since 1984, the number of Summer Olympic events for women has nearly tripled, to 151, while last summer’s Paris Games was the first to reach gender parity, with women accounting for half of the 10,500 athletes in France. Fittingly the women’s marathon was given a place of honor on the calendar there, run as the final event of the track and field competition and one of the last medal events of the Games.

None of that seemed likely — or even possible — before Samuelson’s win.

“I sort of use marathoning as a way to storytell,” Samuelson said from her home in Maine. “And I tell people LA 84 and the first women’s Olympic marathon was certainly the biggest win of my life.”

Advertisement

It was life-changing for many other women as well.

Until 1960, the longest Olympic track race for women was 200 meters. The 1,500 meters was added in 1972, yet it wasn’t until the L.A. Games that the leaders of the International Olympic Committee, who had long cited rampant myths and dubious sports-medicine studies about the dangers of exercise for women, approved the addition of two distance races, the 3,000 meters and marathon.

Which isn’t to say women had never run long distances in the Olympics. At the first modern Games in Athens in 1896, a Greek woman named Stamata Revithi, denied a place on the starting line on race day, ran the course alone a day later, finishing in 5 hours and 30 minutes, an accomplishment witnesses confirmed in writing.

Her performance was better than at least seven of the 17 male runners, who didn’t complete the race. But she was barred from entering Panathenaic Stadium and her achievement was never recognized.

Eighty-eight years passed before a woman was allowed to run the Olympic marathon.

Advertisement

“There are men that are raised with resentment for women, except for their own mothers. That’s just a part of their nature,” Hall of Fame track coach Bob Larsen said. “A lot of good things have happened in the last couple of decades. Old men are passing away and opening doors [for] people who have a more modern understanding of what women are capable of.”

In between Revithi and Samuelson, women routinely were banned even from public races like the Boston Marathon, which didn’t allow females to run officially until 1972. Even then, women had to bring a doctor’s note declaring them fit to run, said Maggie Mertens, author of “Better, Faster, Farther: How Running Changed Everything We Know About Women.”

Seven years later Norway’s Grete Waitz became the first woman to break 2:30 in the marathon, running 2:27.32 in New York, a time that would have been good for second in the elite men’s race in Chicago that same day.

Because of that, Samuelson said she hardly was blazing a trail in L.A. Instead she was running in the wake of pioneers such as Kathrine Switzer, Bobbi Gibb and Waitz.

Advertisement

“I ran because there was an opportunity, not because I wanted to prove that women could run marathons,” said Samuelson, who still is running at 67. “Women had been proving themselves long before the ’84 Games.

“If anything, maybe my win inspired women to realize that if marathoning were a metaphor for life, anything in life is possible.”

Joan Benoit Samuelson is crowned with a laurel wreath on a winner's podium; at left, then-Lt. Gov. John Kerry.

Joan Benoit Samuelson receives a laurel wreath after winning the Boston Marathon in April 1983. At left, then-Lt. Gov. John Kerry.

(Associated Press)

Still, when Samuelson beat Waitz in Los Angeles, running in prime time during a race that was beamed to television viewers around the world, “that was the game-changer,” Switzer, the first woman to run Boston as an official competitor, told Mertens.

Advertisement

“When people saw it on television … they said, ‘Oh my God, women can do anything.’”

A barrier had fallen and there was no going back.

“You could make the argument that in women’s sports in general, we had to see, we had to have these women prove on the biggest stage possible that they were capable so that these gatekeepers would let women come in and play sports and be part of this world,” Mertens said. “I think it really did help burst open those ideas about what we could do and what we could see.”

As a result, the elite runners who have followed in Samuelson’s footsteps never have known a world in which women were barred from long-distance races.

“I grew up believing that women ran the marathon and that it wasn’t a big deal,” said Kara Goucher, a two-time Olympian and a world championship silver medalist who was 6 when Samuelson won in L.A. “I grew up seeing women run the marathon as the norm. That 100% is a credit to Joanie going out there on the world’s biggest stage and normalizing it.”

Advertisement

Paige Wood, a former U.S. marathon champion, said her high school coach was inspired to run marathons by Samuelson’s story and passed that inspiration on to her runners.

“She used her as an example of why we shouldn’t put any mental limitations on ourselves or shouldn’t let others tell us what we are capable of,” Wood said.

Wood was born in 1996 and remembers her mom, who was very athletic, saying that cheerleading was the only sport available to her in high school in the pre-Samuelson days.

“It’s undeniable, right? The courage she gave other women to start running and start competing,” Wood continued. “The trickle-down effect, it’s not even limited to running. It affected all sports and just made women less afraid to be athletic and try all different sports.”

A year after Samuelson’s victory, the U.S. women’s soccer team played its first game, although it was more than a decade before the WNBA, the country’s first professional women’s league. There are now leagues in six other sports, from ice hockey and lacrosse to rugby and volleyball, and female athletes like Caitlin Clark, Alex Morgan, Simone Biles and Katie Ledecky are household names.

Advertisement
Joan Benoit Samuelson walks away from the finish line at the 2019 Boston Marathon.

Joan Benoit Samuelson, first women’s Olympics marathon winner, walks from the finish line after running in the 2019 Boston Marathon.

(Winslow Townson / Associated Press)

Last summer in Paris, Sifan Hassan won the women’s marathon in an Olympic-record 2:22.55 after taking bronze in both the 5,000 and 10,000 meters, events that weren’t even on the Olympic calendar when Samuelson won her race. Two months later Kenyan Ruth Chepng’etich became the first woman to run under 2:10 when she won the Chicago Marathon in 2:09:56, averaging 4:57 a mile.

Until 1970, two years before the Boston Marathon was opened to women, only one man had broken 2:10 in the race.

“It says so much about sport and the way that humans don’t quite know what we’re capable of until we do it,” Mertens said. “We’re going to keep pushing those goalposts back. We’ve come so far, and I think that’s more to do with just having the opportunities and know that there aren’t really limits.

Advertisement

“That’s the power of sports. These people are inspiring us; [they] help us see women as powerful athletes but also powerful in politics, as leaders.”

Did Samuelson make that happen? Or did she simply make it happen faster?

“You’d have to decide whether it was a huge defining moment or just a general wave of athletic events that made this possible,” Larsen said. “You know, the more times you put someone up at the plate, sooner or later somebody’s going to hit it out.

“Now it’s acceptable to have a woman running for president. So things are happening and it’s more acceptable to the general public. Was Joanie a big part of it? I would think so.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Sports

Jets QB Aaron Rodgers: Without leaks ‘it will be a little easier to win’

Published

on

Jets QB Aaron Rodgers: Without leaks ‘it will be a little easier to win’

Less than a week after The Athletic published a story detailing dysfunction within the New York Jets organization, quarterback Aaron Rodgers used his latest appearance on “The Pat McAfee Show” to address leaks to journalists.

“There’s definitely some leaks,” Rodgers said during his Monday appearance. “There’s people that have relationships with people in the media. There’s motivations for writing stories it seems like and nothing is surprising at this point. There’s some interesting things that go on in every organization — some that would like to be left uncovered but it seems like here those don’t always get left uncovered. They get covered.”

Rodgers also mused on the show about the possibility of getting released after the season, and joked at the recent reporting of owner Woody Johnson receiving team input from his teenage sons.

“Being released would be a first; being released by a teenager, that would also be a first,” Rodgers said with a laugh during his weekly spot on the show.

Those comments came as part of a discussion of The Athletic’s story about Johnson’s perceived mismanagement of the franchise. Among the details contained in that piece: “Madden” video game ratings led Johnson to nix a trade for wide receiver Jerry Jeudy, and the owners’ teenage sons have been increasingly influential when it comes to Johnson’s decisions.

Advertisement

Later during the “McAfee” appearance, Rodgers added: “It can’t be the norm that there’s so many leaks and so many people continue to have conversations whether its getting some sort of angle of revenge or even with people who are still in the building. The standard needs to be you are not creating questions for other people all the time. Leaking these things doesn’t become the standard.

“Obviously, what’s best for the Jets is not having these types of leaks all the time. When that gets figured out, it will be a little easier to win. That doesn’t have a direct impact on the players on the field but it does have an impact on the culture and the chemistry and the overall energy of the building. That’s what needs to get better.”

On Sunday, the Jets fell to 4-11 following a home loss to the Los Angeles Rams. Rodgers, a four-time NFL MVP, has played in every game this season after an Achilles injury limited him to just the first four snaps in 2023. He has thrown for 3,511 yards, 24 touchdowns and eight interceptions this season. Last month, The Athletic reported that Johnson suggested benching Rodgers in September. With two games remaining in this season, the 41-year-old’s future with the team remains in question.

In October, Johnson fired head coach Robert Saleh, the same day offensive coordinator Nathaniel Hackett was demoted as the team’s play caller. One week later, wide receiver Davante Adams — a close friend of Rodgers’ — was acquired via trade. In November, general manager Joe Douglas was dismissed. The team has already started its search to fill the open GM spot.

Required reading

(Photo: Emilee Chinn / Getty Images)

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending