Washington, D.C
Sen. Cruz Sends Letter to Washington D.C. Officials to Preserve Evidence of Potentially Illegal Abortion Procedures for Future Congressional Oversight | U.S. Senator Ted Cruz of Texas

WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), Ranking Member of the Subcommittee on the Constitution and member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, sent a letter to Washington D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser, Chief Medical Examiner Francisco J. Diaz, MD, and Metropolitan Police Department Chief Pamela A. Smith to provide notice of their obligations to preserve evidence for future Congressional oversight hearings regarding inquiries of preemie-sized fetal remains discovered outside an abortion clinic in March 2022.
In the letter, Sen. Cruz wrote, “As I previously explained to your offices, it is a grave injustice both that these children may very well have been aborted in violation of federal law, and that the D.C. government—that Congress oversees—remains unwilling to investigate the circumstances. Despite the grotesque evidence of potentially illegal abortion procedures, the District of Columbia and Department of Justice authorities have consistently stonewalled inquiries into the deaths of the five aborted babies, with the D.C. police claiming the case remains “open” and“under investigation” as recently as August 2023, despite no meaningful progress or updates in over sixteen months. … To be clear, the remains of these five children are critical evidence in the
Congressional oversight that the Subcommittee on the Constitution will conduct in the imminent
future. Should the D.C. Medical Examiner’s office decide not to conduct timely autopsies, or
preserve the bodies of these babies for outside examination, the Senate Judiciary Committee willhave no choice but to expand this issue into a full hearing featuring the Department of Justice and the Office of the D.C. Medical Examiner as witnesses before the American public.”
Read the full letter here or below:
Dear Mayor Bowser, Chief Examiner Diaz, and Chief Smith:
I write today in my capacity as Ranking Member of the Subcommittee on the Constitution, United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary for the second and final time to provide notice of your obligations to preserve evidence for future Congressional oversight hearings. As you are all aware, the United States Congress holds unique jurisdiction and constitutional authority to oversee the District of Columbia under Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 of the United States Constitution. This oversight role becomes especially important, however, when the executive leadership of Washington, D.C. demonstrates a candid willingness to obstruct justice by refusing to investigate, much less respond, to basic inquiries about the manners and means of fetal deaths, deaths that could very well have occurred through procedures conducted in violation of federal law.
Recent news indicates that the Department of Justice reportedly advised the D.C. Chief Medical Examiner to dispose of the remains of five aborted preemie-sized babies, as disclosed by attorney Martin Cannon, who is representing pro-life activists currently being prosecuted by the Department of Justice. As he explains, on a February 5, 2024: “[he] got a call from the medical examiner’s office indicating that the Department of Justice… advised [the medical examiner’s office] that there is no reason to keep those babies anymore.”[10] In reaction to this directive, Cannon reported that: “The medical examiner’s office… tells [him] that if [they] don’t have an order to the contrary, by the end of this week … [then] they will dispose of the babies.”[11] Cannon went on to express concern over the medical examiner’s decision to instantly heed the Department’s directive to dispose of the evidence, questioning why the examiner’s office would take “such stark marching orders from the DOJ.”[12]
This news comes almost two years after Lauren Handy and her colleague Terrisa Bukovinac made a chilling discovery outside a Foggy Bottom-based abortion facility known as Washington Surgi-Clinic, which is operated by Dr. Cesare Santangelo, an abortionist who is known for conducting late-term abortions. There, these two pro-life activists encountered the mutilated bodies of five preemie-sized aborted babies, babies that, given their size and maturity, might very well have been aborted in violation of federal law. Accordingly, this evidence warrants an investigation into the circumstances surrounding the deaths of the unusually-mature fetal remains, particularly regarding whether ‘the Five’ were born alive and left to die, subjected to partial-birth abortion procedures, or were otherwise murdered following botched abortion attempts.
As I made your offices aware on April 8, 2022, under the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003,[13] a partial-birth abortion occurs when a physician partially delivers a living child for the purpose of performing an overt act that intentionally takes the life of the child.[14] The U.S. Supreme Court upheld the federal ban on partial-birth abortions in Gonzales v. Carhart.[15] Additionally, Congress passed the Born Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002 to provide equal protections for children who are born alive during an abortion.[16]
As I previously explained to your offices, it is a grave injustice both that these children may very well have been aborted in violation of federal law, and that the D.C. government—that Congress oversees—remains unwilling to investigate the circumstances. Despite the grotesque evidence of potentially illegal abortion procedures, the District of Columbia and Department of Justice authorities have consistently stonewalled inquiries into the deaths of the five aborted babies, with the D.C. police claiming the case remains “open” and “under investigation” as recently as August 2023, despite no meaningful progress or updates in over sixteen months.[17] The Mayor’s Office has similarly evaded questions about the matter, redirecting queries and refusing to comment, while the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner has not disclosed whether any autopsies have been conducted on the babies’ bodies.[18] Simultaneously, while efforts to seek justice for these innocent lives have been thwarted at almost every conceivable turn, Mayor Bowser has aggressively characterized the charges facing peaceful pro-life activists like Lauren Handy, accusing her of “tampering with fetal remains,” blocking the entrance to a D.C. abortion clinic in October 2020,” and committing “serious violations of federal law.”[19]
Even more disturbing, however, is the recent news that the Medical Examiner’s Office has expressed concrete plans to destroy all evidence before justice can be achieved. To do so, would deny these five innocent victims justice and assume the cause and nature of these children’s deaths without conducting any investigation, without performing any autopsies, and without even affording these children a proper, respectful burial.
In April 2022, I joined letters demanding that you, the Department of Justice, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) open investigations to determine whether these children were aborted in violation of federal law, specifically the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003. The letter led by Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) sent on April 8, 2022 to the Department of Justice and the FBI reiterated similar requests to ensure preservation of each of the five bodies as evidence for future investigations.
I write separately today to speak specifically to some of the oversight actions that justify this second and final preservation demand. Specifically, and while I understand that the DOJ is pressuring the D.C. Medical Examiner to dispose of the bodies, I am demanding in the strongest possible terms that you do not do so. Furthermore, I ask that Mayor Bowser and Police Chief Smith direct the Chief Medical Examiner Diaz to conduct an autopsy of each of these five children’s bodies.
It is highly likely that after the upcoming election in November 2024, control of the Senate will shift to the Republican Party. At that time, when I am Chairman of the Subcommittee on the Constitution, I will schedule hearings on likely violations, like those at issue with these five children, of the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003 and the Born Alive Infants Protection Act. These hearings will also no doubt scrutinize the behavior of those who obstructed Senate investigatory efforts by willfully destroying evidence despite not one, but two, demands to preserve evidence. To be clear, the remains of these five children are critical evidence in the Congressional oversight that the Subcommittee on the Constitution will conduct in the imminent future. Should the D.C. Medical Examiner’s office decide not to conduct timely autopsies, or preserve the bodies of these babies for outside examination, the Senate Judiciary Committee will have no choice but to expand this issue into a full hearing featuring the Department of Justice and the Office of the D.C. Medical Examiner as witnesses before the American public.[20]
Please confirm proof of your compliance with these evidence preservation demands no later than February 9, 2024.
Sincerely,
/x/
###

Washington, D.C
The Spots Of The Summer, DC Edition – Washington DC – The Infatuation
Visit DC in the middle of summer and you might wonder why this place was ever settled—much less chosen as the country’s capital. It’s humid, scorching hot, and mosquitoes fly around in swarms so dense you could rest a beer on them. But summer in DC also means hammering fresh crabs on newspaper-lined picnic tables, eating tacos on rooftops overlooking the Washington Monument, and pairing Chesapeake oysters with local beers like it’s your job. In a city with infamously long summers, there are more than a few places to actually enjoy the hottest time of the year. Here are some of the best.
Washington, D.C
Waterways around DC will be closed during June 14 military parade

Waterways around the District will be closed off as part of the security plan for the upcoming military parade marking the U.S. Army’s 250th birthday.
The preliminary plan is to block off access to the Potomac River from in Hains Point all the way up to the Key Bridge, News4 has learned.
Not everyone is happy with that decision.
Capt. Tim Blanchard, who runs the Fish the Potomac charter boat company near Navy Yard had his sights set on a busy day June 14.
“It’s Father’s Day weekend — so that’s one of the biggest weekends to get out on the water,” Blanchard said.
But the word now is trickling down to business and boat owners like Blanchard that much of the Potomac around the immediate area of the District will be off-limits June 14 because of the planned Army 250 events.
“They shut it down. It’s basically like closing the street for your store,” Blanchard said. “And we just can’t operate.”
Blanchard said he’s concerned about the economic impact on his business.
“Ah, this could be a couple grand for me, which, you know, for a small business like mine, it’s not a small amount of money,” he said. “You know, that’s probably my slip fee for a month and fuel.”
The Coast Guard sent out a memo saying in part: “This action is being taken to protect government officials, mitigate potential terrorist acts and incidents, and enhance public and maritime safety and security immediately before, during, and after this event.”
The military parade is expected to take place along Constitution Avenue NW between 15th and 23rd streets. More than 100 military vehicles are expected to roll out for the event. Army tanks already are headed to D.C., along with other equipment.
A massive air show featuring military planes and helicopters is also expected.
D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser is warning of potential travel delays in the skies.
“There could be some disruption to the airspace at times,” Bowser said. “We don’t know when that is, but that could affect, for short periods of time, air travel.”
The Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority expects some air traffic to be halted at times, the agency confirmed to News4.
As for Blanchard, the charter boat captain, he said he’s hoping that maybe the government could make an exception for boats like his on that day. However, right now there’s no indication that a change in security will happen.
Washington, D.C
DC Council votes to pause tipped wage increase

The D.C. Council has voted to pause further implementation of Initiative 82 until October.
Back in 2022, nearly 74% of District voters cast their ballots to phase out the minimum wage for restaurant and hospitality workers whose wages also include tips.
Back then, it was about $5 per hour. The Initiative has increased it, in steps, $10.
The vote was eight to four to pause the next step of Initiative 82, which would raise the minimum tipped wage for service workers to $12 an hour.
At-Large Councilmember Kenyan McDuffie said pausing the July first increase allows the council to assess the Initiative’s impact on workers and businesses.
Some DC bars and restaurants have cited increased costs from Initiative 82 as reasons for closing.
In a statement, the Restaurant Association of Metropolitan Washington applauded the council vote, saying, “We also appreciate that many of the Councilmembers drew attention to the fact that DC’s economic conditions have changed drastically since Initiative 82 was on the ballot in 2022.”
The statement went on to say, “It’s our shared responsibility to consider the world as it is rather than as it was.”
D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser told Advisory Neighborhood Commissioners and Civic Association Presidents who gathered to discuss the District’s 2026 budget that she backs full repeal.
“Fast forward a couple of years and we’re seeing a very challenging environment for our restaurants, so I proposed to the council that I-82 be repealed,” she said.
Paul Schwalb, the president of Unite Here Local 2025 Labor Union, which represents 7,000 hospitality workers in the area, called the pause of Initiative 82 a betrayal of workers and the people who voted for it.
“We believe that the council’s position is outrageous and undemocratic,” he told News4. “We believe also on the merits of it, these workers need a raise, which is why the voters of D.C. twice gave them a raise, and we find it, again, inexplicable why the council decided to stall those raises.”
Back in 2018, D.C. voters approved a similar wage measure called Initiative 77. It was overturned by the Council before it went into effect.
-
Culture1 week ago
Can You Match These Canadian Novels to Their Locations?
-
Politics1 week ago
Trump admin asking federal agencies to cancel remaining Harvard contracts
-
Technology1 week ago
The Browser Company explains why it stopped developing Arc
-
News1 week ago
Harvard's president speaks out against Trump. And, an analysis of DEI job losses
-
News1 week ago
Read the Trump Administration Letter About Harvard Contracts
-
News7 days ago
Video: Faizan Zaki Wins Spelling Bee
-
World1 week ago
Drone war, ground offensive continue despite new Russia-Ukraine peace push
-
Politics5 days ago
Michelle Obama facing backlash over claim about women's reproductive health