Connect with us

Washington, D.C

After Roe, some questions and concern over future abortion access in D.C.

Published

on

After Roe, some questions and concern over future abortion access in D.C.


Roe v. Wade’s overturning in June returned the regulation — or banning — of abortion to particular person states and a minimum of 15 states have since ceased almost all abortion providers.

Nonetheless, there are some questions on decidedly non-state Washington, D.C.

As a federal district, it operates beneath the 1973 House Rule Act, which supplies sure authority to the D.C. mayor and 13 elected councilmembers however reserves for Congress the final word energy to control.

D.C. has a number of the least restrictive abortion legal guidelines within the nation: It’s authorized for all phases of being pregnant. Nonetheless, due to the district’s distinctive standing beneath Congress, abortion entry has different caveats. Medicaid funding, for instance, can’t be used as it could actually in states.

Advertisement

With the Republican Get together hoping to retake the Home and Senate in November — a possible end result a minimum of within the Home, in response to FiveThirtyEight — some conservative lawmakers have brazenly mused about making an attempt to repeal the district’s restricted autonomy and abortion entry together with it.

In previous makes an attempt to limit abortions within the district, native councilmembers may depend on Roe as a authorized barricade. The post-Roe future is extra unsure.

Probably the most outspoken opponent of residence rule is Rep. Andrew Clyde, R-Ga., who mentioned in February he deliberate to introduce laws to successfully dissolve what he deemed a “failed experiment.”

“My forthcoming laws to repeal D.C.’s House Rule Act will comply with and uphold the Structure, interval,” Clyde advised Politico in June, after the Supreme Court docket reversed Roe. “Regardless of the Left’s lie that ladies have a constitutional proper to abortion, the Structure clearly secures an unalienable proper to reside — but it surely doesn’t present a proper to abortion.”

D.C. Councilmember Brianne Nadeau mentioned the proposals by Clyde and different conservatives referred to as for heightened warning from native officers.

Advertisement

Demonstrators are seen on Structure Avenue throughout a march for abortion rights in response to the Supreme Courts leaked draft opinion indicating the Court docket will overturn Roe v. Wade, Could 14, 2022.

Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Name, Inc through Getty Photographs, FILE

“Every time a Republican member of Congress mentions [ending home rule], I feel we’ve got to be ready to guard our residents’ rights from being curtailed,” Nadeau advised ABC Information.

On Could 6, within the wake of the leak of a draft of the Supreme Court docket’s majority opinion putting down Roe, Nadeau launched the People Rights Sanctuary Modification Act of 2022. She referred to as it a wanted safety. If handed, it might forestall the district from cooperating in out-of-state investigations with the objective to impose legal or civil legal responsibility for abortion, contraception use and different protected conduct.

“My invoice additionally anticipates additional motion by the Supreme Court docket which may forestall individuals from upholding their marriage or receiving gender-affirming care,” Nadeau mentioned. “If there is a same-sex couple or a trans little one who wants lifesaving well being care, I wish to be sure that D.C. has already contemplated that future want for correct safety.”

Advertisement

Nadeau’s proposal additionally features a countermeasure — a non-public proper of motion — in opposition to state legal guidelines that empower plaintiffs to sue individuals they think are related to unlawful abortions, such because the novel Texas legislation handed in 2021.

Nadeau’s invoice is modeled on Connecticut’s Reproductive Freedom Protection Act, signed into legislation in Could, which shields abortion seekers from out-of-state scrutiny and state clinicians from lawsuits from out-of-state plaintiffs.

The D.C. Council held a public listening to associated to reproductive well being care on July 14, by which Kate Vlach, the coverage director for the Workplace of the D.C. Legal professional Normal, mentioned district clinicians had been “unsure if they could face legal prosecution for offering providers” to out-of-state abortion seekers.

In the meantime, the district’s non-voting delegate to Congress, Eleanor Holmes Norton, has referred to as on Congress to rethink statehood and codify abortion into federal legislation — each dim prospects given GOP opposition, Democrats’ slim majorities and moderates’ help for the Senate filibuster.

After Roe, some questions and concern over future abortion access in D.C.

Ward One Councilmember Brianne Nadeau speaks throughout the 2015 District of Columbia Inauguration ceremony on the Conference Heart in Washington, Jan. 2, 2015.

Carolyn Kaster/AP, FILE

Advertisement

At a Home Oversight Committee listening to on July 13, Norton urged: “Statehood is one of the best ways for D.C. to guard abortion entry for its residents.”

A repeal of the decades-old residence rule or a crackdown on D.C.’s abortion entry are additionally slim within the brief time period: Clyde’s plan has not risen to management stage. Kentucky Republican Rep. James Comer, the rating member of the Home Oversight Committee, advised Axios final month: “There have been no discussions committee-wide on this. That is an Andrew Clyde mission that he feels very keen about.”

D.C. Councilmember Nadeau advised ABC Information there have been bigger challenges to eradicating the realm’s autonomy.

“It is not that easy to take over a district that has had an area authorities for greater than 40 years, after which don’t have any different plan for it,” she argued. “I feel this issue will probably be a tough deterrent [for the Republican Party] to beat.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Washington, D.C

Skull of St. Thomas Aquinas to Visit Washington, DC, On International Tour

Published

on

Skull of St. Thomas Aquinas to Visit Washington, DC, On International Tour


Friday’s event will begin with a solemn Mass celebrated by Cardinal Wilton Gregory, archbishop of Washington, followed by an opportunity to venerate the relics.

The major relics of St. Thomas Aquinas, “The Angelic Doctor,” are on tour and scheduled to make a stop in Washington, D.C., next weekend as part of the commemoration of the 700th anniversary of his canonization.

Members of the faithful will be able to venerate the relics, including his skull, on two separate occasions: first at St. Dominic’s Church on Friday, Nov. 29, and then again on Saturday, Nov. 30, at the Dominican House of Studies. The event is co-sponsored by the Thomistic Institute.

Advertisement

“In a time of renewed interest in the teaching of St. Thomas Aquinas, the jubilees of his canonization (700 years in 2023), death (750 years in 2024), and birth (800 years in 2025) draw our attention to the masterwork of wisdom and sanctity which God wrought in him,” Dominican Father Gregory Pine, assistant director at the Thomistic Institute, said in a press release.

“The opportunity that we have to receive and venerate his relics makes this grace all the more proximate and precious to us,” Father Pine added.

Friday’s event will begin at 12:10 p.m. with a solemn Mass celebrated by Cardinal Wilton Gregory, archbishop of Washington, followed by an opportunity to venerate the relics of the revered theologian and philosopher from 1 p.m. to 7 p.m. There will also be solemn vespers at 5:30 p.m. and night prayer at 6:45 p.m. with a Marian procession to follow.

On Saturday, the Dominican House of Studies will begin the day with solemn lauds and a votive Mass of St. Thomas Aquinas at 7:30 a.m., and veneration of the relics will take place from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. Pine will also preach at 3 p.m. that day.

“‘Get wisdom, get understanding’ (Prv 4:5). One way is to study, another way is to pray for it, but an exceptional way is to pray for it in the presence of the skull of St. Thomas Aquinas,” Dominican Father James Brent, an assistant professor of philosophy at the Dominican House of Studies, also stated in the release.

Advertisement

The relic of St. Thomas Aquinas’ skull comes to the U.S. from the Dominicans in Toulouse, France, and is one of two skulls Church officials claim to have belonged to the 11th-century saint. The other is housed in the Italian city of Priverno. The Dominicans in France commissioned a new reliquary for the skull last year to celebrate the saint’s canonization anniversary.

After Aquinas’ death in 1274, his body was kept in Fossanova Abbey in Priverno until 1369, when his relics were moved to Toulouse, a city in southwestern France, where the Order of Preachers was established. Aquinas’ tomb rests in the Church of the Jacobins.

Researchers are currently weighing the possibility of conducting an in-depth forensic analysis of both skulls to determine their authenticity.

Where do the relics go next?

After two stops in Washington, D.C., on Nov. 29 and Nov. 30, Aquinas’ relics hit the road for their U.S. tour:

Advertisement

Charlottesville, Virginia: St. Thomas Aquinas on Dec. 2

Providence, Rhode Island: Providence College on Dec. 4

Cincinnati: St. Gertrude Priory on Dec. 6

Columbus, Ohio: St. Patrick Priory on Dec. 7–8

Louisville, Kentucky: St. Louis Bertrand on Dec. 10

Advertisement

Springfield, Kentucky: St. Rose Priory on Dec. 12

New York City: St. Vincent Ferrer on Dec. 14

Philadelphia: St. Patrick on Dec. 16

Baltimore: Sts. Philip and James on Dec. 18

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Washington, D.C

DC brothers freed after wrongful murder convictions seek presidential pardon

Published

on

DC brothers freed after wrongful murder convictions seek presidential pardon


Two brothers who spent decades in prison after being convicted of a 1984 murder in Washington, D.C., they say they did not commit, are seeking a presidential pardon.

Charles and Chris Turner were convicted as teenagers for the killing of Catherine Fuller in Northeast Washington, D.C. near the intersection of 8th and H Street, Fox 5 DC reported.

They have since been released and are fighting for a pardon that would help restore their rights.

“With the pardon, we get a chance to fix all that and bring a closure to this case once and for all,” Chris Turner told Fox 5 DC.

Advertisement

TWO TEENS ARRESTED IN CONNECTION WITH ROBBERY THAT LEFT BELOVED DC DJ DEAD: ‘WE WILL HOLD YOU ACCOUNTABLE’

Charles and Chris Turner were convicted as teenagers for the killing of Catherine Fuller in Northeast Washington, D.C. near the intersection of 8th and H Street. (iStock)

After decades in custody for a crime which they did not commit, the brothers maintain a positive view on the future and the impact they can have moving forward, stressing that they will not allow their case to mentally hold them back.

“People get upset more that we’re not bitter,” Chris Turner said. “We think if you remain bitter, remain upset about what occurred – even though it was an atrocity and it was injustice – that you stay locked up mentally.”

The case revealed allegations of suppressed evidence, coerced testimony and investigative errors.

Advertisement

Seventeen people were arrested in connection with Fuller’s murder, with eight ultimately convicted, according to Fox 5 DC. The six who are still alive all maintain their innocence after collectively serving more than 200 years behind bars.

HEAD OF DC PRESCHOOL ARRESTED AFTER DIRECTING UNDERCOVER OFFICER ‘TO ABUSE HIS CHILD,’ JUSTICE DEPARTMENT SAYS

Jail

The Turner brothers have become involved in their community and remain hopeful about their futures, although limitations in areas such as career prospects remain due to their felony records.

“We’ve actually said we might join the police force if we didn’t have this on our record … I used to want to be in the Navy. I can’t serve my country because I have a record,” Charles Turner said.

The brothers’ fight for a pardon represents a crucial step in restoring their reputation and rights lost in the convictions.

Advertisement
Handcuffs on man

The case revealed allegations of suppressed evidence, coerced testimony and investigative errors. (iStock)

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Charles Turner said he believes a pardon would bring validation to himself and the other five convicted men, as well as to his family, friends and others who have supported him.

“It would also validate – help to validate – what they know, not what they believe, but what they know. There’s a big difference there,” he said.

Most presidential pardons have been granted between Election Day and Inauguration Day.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Washington, D.C

Caps Have Saturday Night Date with Devils in DC | Washington Capitals

Published

on

Caps Have Saturday Night Date with Devils in DC | Washington Capitals


November 23 vs. New Jersey Devils at Capital One Arena

Time: 7:00 p.m.

TV: MNMT

Radio: 106.7 The Fan, Caps Radio 24/7

Advertisement

New Jersey Devils (13-7-2)

Washington Capitals (13-5-1)

When the Caps and Devils first met this season on Oct. 12 here in Washington’s home opener, New Jersey was playing its fourth game of the season. Six weeks later, the Devils are back in town for another Saturday night Metro Division tilt, and the Caps still hold three games in hand on New Jersey.

And in a fun scheduling quirk, the Caps and Devils are starting their second set of “back-to-back” Saturday home-and-home contests in as many months. After the Devils spoiled the Caps’ season opener here last month, Washington won 6-5 in New Jersey a week later, on Oct. 19. The Caps and Devils will conclude their season’s series next Saturday night in Newark.

The Caps come into Saturday’s game on the heels of regulation loss, 2-1 to the Avalanche in the opener of this quick two-game homestand. Thursday’s loss to Colorado was Washington’s first setback at the hands of a Western Conference opponent this season (7-1-0) and also its first regulation defeat in a one-goal game (3-1-1) in 2024-25.

Advertisement

Last weekend, the Caps started a successful three-game road trip out west with a 5-2 win over the Avalanche in Denver, a victory fueled by staunch defense and an opportunistic offense that feasted on transition. Six nights later in Washington, the Caps were still able to generate some transition opportunities, but they had much less success in solving goaltender Alexandar Georgiev, who came off injured reserve to make 26 saves, winning his fourth consecutive start.

And while Washington got another strong goaltending performance from Logan Thompson, the Caps spent more time defending in their end of the ice than they did in the earlier meeting in Denver, leaving less time and energy for attacking.

“I think we played pretty well,” says Caps’ defenseman John Carlson. “We got some chances we didn’t capitalize on, that have seemingly been going in for us. And with kind of a tough bounce against us, too, the game could be a lot different.”

The bounce to which Carlson refers occurred late in the second period with the Caps clinging to a 1-0 lead. With Colorado on the power play against the excellent Washington penalty killing outfit, Mikko Rantanen attempted to thread a seam pass from the right circle to Nathan MacKinnon at the opposite dot. The pass never got through; it clicked off Caps’ defenseman Matt Roy and bounded into the net, knotting the game at 1-1. Miles Wood tipped home a Cale Makar shot early in the third, and that was all the offense Georgiev needed.

“We were very average, and I thought their top guys were very noticeable tonight,” was Caps’ coach Spencer Carbery’s assessment of Thursday’s loss. “They controlled play, and they could have had three or four [goals]. They were on us pretty good.”

Advertisement

Playing without injured captain Alex Ovechkin for the first time this season, and with a couple of new line combinations as a result, the Caps weren’t as polished with the puck as they’ve been recently, so once again, they’ll be seeking to bounce back successfully from a setback, something they’ve done five times in five opportunities to this point of the season.

In the midst of the Caps’ recent offensive upswing and Ovechkin’s remarkable early-season heater – right up to the point of his injury in Utah on Monday – the team’s defensive consistency has gone a bit under the radar.

As they forged a 7-2-0 record in October, the Caps averaged 4.11 goals for (tied for third in NHL) and they surrendered an average of three goals against even, per game (tied for 10th). Ten games into November now, they are 6-3-1 while averaging a League-leading 4.2 goals per game. The Caps have trimmed their goals against per game to 2.5 in November, tied for eighth in the League. Washington has permitted two or fewer goals against in seven of its 10 games this month.

Last season, when the Caps managed to hold their opponent to two or fewer goals, they rolled up a 29-2-3 record. After Thursday’s loss, they are 9-1-0 in such games this season.

While the Caps tangled with the Avalanche on Thursday, the Devils earned a 4-2 home ice victory over the Carolina Hurricanes. When Washington skated away with the aforementioned 6-5 overtime win over New Jersey in Newark on Oct. 19, the loss started the Devils on a small 0-2-2 spiral. Since then, New Jersey has played to an 8-3-0 record, getting blanked in all three of its losses over that stretch.

Advertisement

New Jersey has been a well-balanced bunch in the first quarter of the campaign. The Devils are averaging 3.45 goals per game (eighth in NHL) and they are giving up just 2.64 goals against (seventh). They’ve yielded two or fewer goals against in seven of their last 11 games.

In 21 of the last 39 meetings between these two Metropolitan Division rivals, one or both teams have scored five or more goals.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending