Connect with us

Virginia

What Judge Patricia Giles’ Virginia voter roll pause means for the election

Published

on

What Judge Patricia Giles’ Virginia voter roll pause means for the election


A federal judge in Virginia has halted the state’s program to purge its voter rolls of potential non-citizens, and ordered that over 1,600 people be reregistered.

Non-citizen voting has become part of Republicans’ push against what they see as a fraudalent election and criticism of election security. Virginia Governor Glenn Youngkin moved to purge 1,600 people who were suspected of being non-citizens from voter roles, sparking a lawsuit from the U.S. Department of Justice over its efforts to remove voters less than 90 days before Election Day.

On Friday, U.S. District Judge Patricia Tolliver Giles sided with the department, ruling that Virginia had to re-register the people who had been removed from voter rolls. Virginia asked that the ruling be paused pending appeal, but the judge refused, putting the ruling into effect immediately.

Youngkin said the state would appeal, arguing officials had acted within Virginia law to prevent ineligible residents from voting, while immigrant advocacy groups welcomed the ruling as a victory for naturalized citizens.

Advertisement

“Every American citizen, regardless of where they were born, has the freedom to vote,” Paul Smith, senior vice president of Campaign Legal Center, said in a press release.

“Virginia broke the law by conducting a last-minute purge that targeted naturalized citizens. We’re glad the court acted so every Virginian can make their voice heard in this upcoming election.”

A woman fills out her ballot at the early voting location at the Long Bridge Aquatics and Fitness Center on October 21, 2024 in Arlington, Virginia. Early voting in the 2024 election has begun in…


Sipa via AP Images

Youngkin’s directive to monitor and update Virginia’s voter roll came on the first day of the 90-day period, which the DOJ argued was unnecessary, as there were strict rules in place preventing non-citizens from voting in Federal elections.

Youngkin insisted in a statement on Friday that Judge Giles’ ruling meant self-identified non-citizens would be allowed to vote.

“This is a Virginia law passed in 2006, signed by then-Governor Tim Kaine, that mandates certain procedures to remove noncitizens from the voter rolls, with safeguards in place to affirm citizenship before removal–and the ultimate failsafe of same-day registration for U.S. citizens to cast a provisional ballot,” Younkin said in a press release.

Advertisement

“This law has been applied in every Presidential election by Republicans and Democrats since enacted 18 years ago.”

Groups that also sued the state over its actions said residents were unfairly removed because they obtained their drivers licenses with a green card, meaning they were not a U.S. citizen at the time and had said so on documents. But, they’d since become one, making them eligible to vote.

“Today’s court decision affirms that newly naturalized citizens have the same rights as every other voter,” Joan Porte, president of the League of Women Voters of Virginia, said in a press release.

“Purging newly naturalized Virginians is an attack on our democracy. We are proud this ruling protects Virginia voters and ensures their voices are protected and heard”

While Virginia admitted a small portion of the voters that were removed were American citizens, they argued during a hearing Thursday that most of the 1,600 people affected were not eligible to vote.

Advertisement

Charles Cooper, one of the attorneys for Virginia, said that if the court ruled in favor of the DOJ, it was likely that hundreds of non-citizens would vote on November 5.

“If a noncitizen votes, it cancels out a legal vote. And that is a harm,” he told the court Thursday.

Judge Giles’ injunction includes a requirement for letters to be sent to all of those affected, but it will include a line telling those who are non-citizens that they are barred from casting ballots anyway.

Younkin has promised to fight the ruling, with just 11 days to go until Election Day, with former President Donald Trump supporting him in a post on X, formerly Twitter.

“This is a totally unacceptable travesty, and Governor Youngkin is absolutely right to appeal this ILLEGAL ORDER, and the U.S. Supreme Court will hopefully fix it!” Trump posted, adding that only U.S. citizens should be allowed to vote.

Advertisement



Source link

Virginia

Virginia’s gambling expansion must be matched by recovery support

Published

on

Virginia’s gambling expansion must be matched by recovery support


When I was a kid, some of my happiest memories involved gambling. My grandfather would babysit me while my parents worked. We’d pull our chairs up to an old World War II trunk to use as a table where we’d play Crazy Eights, poker or dominoes for pennies. Those moments meant everything to me. They […]



Source link

Continue Reading

Virginia

Virginia State Police investigates fatal crash on Bayside Road in Northampton County

Published

on

Virginia State Police investigates fatal crash on Bayside Road in Northampton County


NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, Va. (WAVY) — Virginia State Police is investigating a fatal crash that happened on Bayside Road in Northampton County Saturday morning.

On March 28 at around 10:52 a.m., a 2016 Nissan Quest was traveling southbound on Bayside Road when it crossed the centerline, ran off of the road’s left side, and hit a ditch and a tree.

The car’s driver, Exmore resident Waylon M. Turner, 42, was seriously injured due to the crash. He succumbed to his injuries after being transported to a local hospital. He wore a seatbelt at the time of the crash.

The crash is now under investigation.

Advertisement

Continue to check WAVY.com for updates.



Source link

Continue Reading

Virginia

Goochland residents sue county over Technology Overlay District approval

Published

on

Goochland residents sue county over Technology Overlay District approval


GOOCHLAND COUNTY, Va. (WRIC) — Four Goochland residents are taking the county’s board of supervisors and planning commission to court, alleging officials failed to lawfully and clearly explain their approved Technology Overlay District (TOD).

In November, the board adjusted zoning rules and approved the TOD and a Technology Zone (TZ) to incentivize data centers and high-tech businesses to be in eastern Goochland.

That approval came after months of community meetings and public comment periods where neighbors shared concerns about the environmental impacts, noise emissions and the county’s rural character.

Plaintiff Cynthia Haas and informal legal advisor John Gessner both live near, but outside, the zone and believe their concerns could lead to unknown impacts of data center development and operations.

Advertisement

“Water, power: nobody knows. It borders on reckless to approve these — or make it easier for them to be built — without knowing exactly what the impacts are,” said Gessner, who also built a career as a zoning lawyer.

“[Data center development] is coming one way or the other,” Haas said. “You’re throwing all this stuff into the TOD without considering the consequences.”

After public hearings, the county made some changes to the project, such as increasing buffers around homes and reforming noise limits.

“It is true there were all sorts of public meetings, but there was never an opportunity to find out really what they were thinking and the reasoning for it,” Gessner said.

The lawsuit claimed Goochland did not properly advertise the project, violated zoning regulations and made last-minute changes to the district without hearing from residents.

Advertisement

Around 300 people have donated to support Haas’s and the plaintiff’s filing, in hopes of reversing the TOD.

A Goochland County spokesperson says its leadership stands by its approval process. In February, its board of supervisors approved a $250,000 fund for the county’s defense. If the county’s defense is less than $250,000, the spokesperson said the additional funds will be returned to the county’s unassigned general fund.

Another $100,000 is being used for the county’s defense, part of a public officials’ liability policy through the Virginia Association of Counties Self-Insurance Risk Pool.

County administration told 8News last year that revenues from businesses in the district would help lower residents’ taxes and help pay for a water and sewer service debt.

The county spokesperson said in part, “Adoption of the TOD and TZ establishes standards and expectations. It does not approve any specific project. Any proposed technology development must still comply with all applicable requirements…”

Advertisement

“We’re going to continue to fight this. We’re not going to let a group of men pass illegal legislation and get away with it,” Haas said. “That’s not the way this is going to working in Goochland anymore.”

A hearing is set for Tuesday, May 26, in the Goochland Circuit Court, where the court will decide which of the 8,500 documents filed will be submitted for the record.

Goochland has asked the court to throw the suit out, but a hearing for that has not been scheduled.

Learn more about the TOD and Goochland County’s full statement on the pending litigation here.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending