Connect with us

Virginia

One of Virginia’s poorest cities is also its least healthy, new rankings show – Virginia Mercury

Published

on

One of Virginia’s poorest cities is also its least healthy, new rankings show – Virginia Mercury


For the second 12 months in a row, Petersburg ranked because the least wholesome locality in Virginia whereas Falls Church took over first place.

The rankings, launched Wednesday by the Robert Wooden Johnson Basis and College of Wisconsin’s Inhabitants Well being Institute, are supposed to provide an annual snapshot of greater than 90 measures affecting well being and high quality of life in counties throughout america. Researchers think about behaviors together with smoking and extreme consuming but additionally embody measures like violent crime charges and entry to grocery shops to evaluate the general well being of a group.

As in earlier years, although, the gulf between Virginia’s highest and lowest-ranked counties underscores the correlation between wealth and well being outcomes — a disparity that well being officers have lengthy struggled to equalize. Falls Church, a majority White metropolis in Northern Virginia, has a median family revenue of practically $147,000 a 12 months, in keeping with the most up-to-date U.S. Census information. Petersburg’s, alternatively, is lower than half of that, at simply over $43,000 a 12 months

The bulk-Black metropolis south of Richmond has struggled with declining wealth for many years. As soon as a affluent group fueled by the railway and tobacco industries, its demographics shifted sharply within the Nineteen Seventies when White residents started transferring out of the town following faculty desegregation in Virginia. That exodus, coupled with a declining railroad business, led to job losses and continued relocation by each residents and companies. By 2009, the town’s tax income wasn’t sufficient to cowl its expenditures, in keeping with the Federal Reserve Financial institution of Richmond.

Advertisement

Medical suppliers are additionally briefly provide. At a city corridor with Gov. Glenn Youngkin earlier this 12 months, metropolis leaders expressed concern that their group of over 33,000 had no pressing care clinic inside metropolis limits. Petersburg’s ratio of residents to major care suppliers is 1,420 to 1, in keeping with this 12 months’s county well being rankings, in comparison with 330 to 1 in Falls Church. And its fee of preventable hospital stays for situations that might be managed in outpatient settings was greater than double that of Falls Church.

COVID-19 additionally performed a job. In 2021, Petersburg’s untimely dying fee — a measure of residents who died earlier than the age of 75 — was already practically seven occasions increased than Arlington’s, the top-rated county final 12 months. Final 12 months’s report didn’t embody deaths attributed to the virus, however these had been factored into the rankings in 2022, in keeping with Molly Murphy, a group scientist with the College of Wisconsin Inhabitants Well being Institute.

Whereas charges of untimely dying really fell in Falls Church, regardless of the pandemic, Petersburg’s elevated once more. Native well being officers additionally struggled to mobilize testing and coverings. Eric Fly, a member of the Board of Supervisors in close by Sussex County, advised the Mercury final 12 months that testing wasn’t extensively obtainable within the Crater Well being District, which incorporates Petersburg, till six months after the state recorded its first case of COVID-19. And whereas Northern Virginia localities initially obtained the lion’s share of vaccines, primarily based on inhabitants density, Crater couldn’t settle for many early shipments as a result of the district didn’t have a deep freezer to retailer them in.

Well being districts in Virginia are funded by a mix of state and native contributions, usually placing less-resourced areas at an obstacle. Whereas nationwide rankings can’t at all times seize real-world examples of how wealth and revenue have an effect on well being outcomes, Murphy stated researchers steadily adapt new measures in an effort to seize these relationships.

This 12 months’s report additionally centered on youngster care as an important indicator affecting each high quality of life and well being. Based on the report, a Virginia household with two youngsters spends a mean 25 p.c of their revenue on youngster care, on par with the nationwide common. However for a lot of localities, together with a number of in Northern and Southwest Virginia, the common is between 33 p.c and 36 p.c. 

Advertisement

Federal benchmarks by the U.S. Division of Well being and Human Providers outline youngster care as unaffordable if it exceeds 7 p.c of family revenue, in keeping with the report. The burden of paying for these companies can power many households to make tough decisions, Murphy stated.

“That more money is coming at the price of different issues, like well being care or meals on the desk or instructional alternatives,” she stated. “All of this stuff that we all know affect our well being bodily and socially and mentally.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Virginia

Virginia Senate whiffs on VMSDEP fix a second time

Published

on

Virginia Senate whiffs on VMSDEP fix a second time


Senate Democrats in Richmond once again failed to pass a bill to fix issues with a state veterans education benefit program Monday. It was the second special session held to address the issue and dragged into the evening.

“We have a bill that will solve everyone’s problems. But instead, we’re not going to vote on it because of a procedural objection,” said Senate Majority Leader Scott Surovell, chastising Republicans for failing to cross party lines and approve a sped-up vote on the majority’s suggested changes to the Virginia Military Survivors and Dependents Education Program, or VMSDEP.

The program was reined in by the legislature and Governor Glenn Youngkin during the recent budget cycle after costs were projected to skyrocket in the coming years. The families of injured vets complained and an effort to roll back the changes while maintaining the program’s sustainability has been a challenge ever since.

Last Friday the House of Delegates passed a so-called “clean repeal” 92-0. It included directions for a state watchdog to study the program and bring findings and suggestions for changes before the 2025 session. That study is still expected by early September.

Advertisement

But Senator Louise Lucas, that chamber’s leading Democrat, refused to hear the House bill Monday and instead pitched her own fix: one that rolled back much of the changes, and included millions of dollars in funding over the next two years.

Surovell said there were also constitutional issues with the House’s measure, but Republican Senator Mark Peake challenged that assessment and argued enough Senate Democrats were in support to pass it.

“We’re here, it’s our second time here, the House has done their job. We should have voted on this bill,” Peake said from the chamber floor Monday.

The Senate will now have to return at a to be determined date to approve their new effort without Republican support. The House would also then have to return to approve the bill. A spokesperson for House Speaker Don Scott had no comment as of Monday evening.

In a statement sent after Monday’s session, Governor Youngkin condemned the Senate’s fruitless, second return to Richmond and asked both chambers to return again as early as next week.

Advertisement

“If they can’t agree on coming back together to fix this, I will call them back to do exactly that,” he said.

This report, provided by Virginia Public Radio, was made possible with support from the Virginia Education Association.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Virginia

United Way of Southwest Virginia announces return of annual ‘Stuff the Bus’ fundraiser

Published

on

United Way of Southwest Virginia announces return of annual ‘Stuff the Bus’ fundraiser


United Way of Southwest Virginia has announced the return of its annual “Stuff the Bus” fundraiser, aimed to provide essential school supplies to students across Southwest Virginia.

The event takes place throughout the month of July in all 21 localities within its service area, impacting over 150 schools and over 73,000 students.

The organization said this fundraiser comes at a particularly crucial time, as families are facing rising school supply costs — expected to exceed $890 per family and an average of $597 per child.

“We believe that every child deserves the opportunity to succeed,” said Megan Parks, Executive Director of United Way of Southwest Virginia. “Our community has always been incredibly supportive, and we are confident that together, we can make a significant impact in the lives of our students.”

School supplies can be donated at designated collection points throughout the region.

Here’s a list of donation locations across our viewing area:

School Division Business Name Address City
Bland County Bland County Public Library 697 Main St. Bland
Carroll County First Community Bank 148 N. Main St. Hillsville
City of Radford First Community Bank 1400 Tyler Ave. Radford
Floyd County Carter Bank & Trust 213 North Locust St. Floyd
Giles County First National Bank of Peterstown 110 Old Virginia Ave. Narrows
Grayson County Carter Bank & Trust 449 E. Main St. Independence
Montgomery County Revivicor 1700 Kraft Dr., Suite 2400 Blacksburg
Montgomery County Blacksburg Boxing & Fitness 115 S Hill Dr. Blacksburg
Montgomery County Coldwell Banker 220 Professional Park Dr. Blacksburg
Montgomery County First Community Bank 1900 South Main St. Blacksburg
Montgomery County First Community Bank 109 Roanoke St. Christiansburg
Pulaski County First Community Bank 1001 Bob White Blvd. Pulaski
Wythe County First Community Bank 145 Ivanhoe Rd. Fort Chiswell
Wythe County First Community Bank 210 E. Main St. Wytheville

To learn more about the fundraiser, click here.

Copyright 2024 by WSLS 10 – All rights reserved.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Virginia

Is West Virginia a Preseason Top 25 Team?

Published

on

Is West Virginia a Preseason Top 25 Team?


For the first time since 2018, we can have a serious conversation about West Virginia and the preseason top 25 rankings. The Mountaineers rattled off nine wins in 2023, ending the year on a strong note winning five of its final six games including a win over North Carolina in the Duke’s Mayo Bowl.

Neal Brown and GM Drew Fabianich did a masterful job of keeping the roster intact through the two transfer portal windows. Of course, they lost a few contributors, but nothing they can’t replace.

WVU returns three members of what was considered to be one of the top offensive line’s in all of college football in 2024. Two others, Nick Malone and Xavier Bausley, have started games at the collegiate level. The depth up front is in terrific shape. In the backfield, the Mountaineers will feature one of the top duos in the country with the contrasting styles of Jahiem White and CJ Donaldson. At receiver, they see the return of four of their top five pass catchers from a year ago, including tight end Kole Taylor who led the team with 35 receptions.

Defensively, the front seven is the unit’s strength. They’ll be able to rotate in anywhere from six to eight along the defensive line while housing the most depth they’ve had at linebacker since this staff arrived in 2019. The secondary is the biggest question mark. On paper, it looks to be an improved group but there are several new faces that make up that third level of the defense which could take some time to gel.

Advertisement

There’s more than enough proven talent on this roster for West Virginia to have a number next to its name to start the 2024 season, but will they? My guess is no. They’ll continue to rank the bigger brands who always fall extremely short of expectations instead – think of Miami, Texas A&M, USC and Tennessee – and others who probably aren’t as deserving but could find their way in such as Louisville, Kentucky, and Virginia Tech. If I had a vote, I’d put West Virginia in the 22-24 range. Instead, they’ll be in the back end of “receiving votes” category when the first set of rankings come out in a matter of weeks.

READ MORE ABOUT WVU ATHLETICS

What is WVU’s Biggest Concern in 2024?

WVU Absent From College Football 25’s Top 25 Offenses

West Virginia Ranked in Phil Steele’s Preseason Top 40

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending