Connect with us

Texas

What does SpaceX’s move to Texas really mean for the South Bay?

Published

on

What does SpaceX’s move to Texas really mean for the South Bay?


The news that SpaceX, the massive aerospace company with an equally vast headquarters in Hawthorne, is apparently departing the South Bay for a new kind of south, caused an immediate stir among other local aerospace startups looking to hire — but also left locals with more questions than answers about how the move will impact the local economy.

Mercurial billionaire and SpaceX founder Elon Musk announced the company’s move from Hawthorne to Texas on Tuesday, July 16, in a post on X, formerly Twitter, rather suddenly.

But despite specific details on the move, other space startups have already been making a drive to recruit SpaceX workers disillusioned by Musk’s plans, offering them perks and inclusive office cultures.

On X, for example, asteroid mining company Astroforge Inc. replied to Musk’s tweet announcing his plans by stating they are hiring and based in Seal Beach  — about 25 miles from SpaceX’s current headquarters.

Advertisement

Musk said his reason to relocate because of frustration over a new law in California related to transgender children in public schools.

The decision was in response to California Gov. Gavin Newsom signing a new state law, which prohibits school districts from requiring staff to notify parents of their child’s gender identification change.

Musk, who has increasingly leaned into far-right conservative rhetoric in recent years, called the governor’s decision a “final straw.”

The CEO of French aerospace company Latitude, Stanislas Maximin, responded by calling on “SpaceX employees misaligned with these values and looking to join an inclusive and highly ambitious rocket company in a great living city near Paris.”

Latitude would cover the cost of moving, visas, health care and find work for a spouse, Maximin said.

Advertisement

But it’s unclear whether such moves will be necessary.

That’s because besides a couple of posts on X, Musk and SpaceX officials have yet to provide any substantial details about what the relocation will actually entail.

SpaceX’s Hawthorne headquarters, a 1-million-square-foot sprawling campus, is home to more than just upper level admin workers — it’s also a production facility for some of the company’s flagship rockets.

Musk and the company have not said whether the entire campus — or other SpaceX facilities in Southern California — would be shut down and moved.

It is possible that the company has already prepared for an extensive and complicated move like that, though. SpaceX, after all, has been building out Starbase — a large facility in South Texas where SpaceX builds and launches its massive Starship rocket system — over the past several years.

Advertisement

Company officials did not respond to requests for comment on both Tuesday and Wednesday —so it is still all together unclear whether that is the company’s actual plan.

Hawthorne city officials, late Tuesday, issued a statement seeming to back up the uncertain nature of the relocation.

“Hawthorne has learned that SpaceX, one of our valued businesses, may potentially relocate its headquarters,” Mayor Alex Vargas said. “While this move would represent a significant change for our community, we remain committed to supporting our local economy and fostering growth.”

SpaceX, according to a report about Hawthorne’s finances during the 2022-23 fiscal year, provides nearly 7,000 jobs — or about 16% of total employment — in the city.

The second largest employer in the city, according to the report, was the Hawthorne School District, with 1,029 and 606 employees, respectively; the next is an Amazon Fulfillment Center in third place.

Advertisement

SpaceX has long been the largest employer in Hawthorne, at least dating back to the 2015-2016 fiscal year, which was the first time Hawthorne included employment levels by company in its annual financial reports.

But it’s unclear whether SpaceX’s plan to relocate the company’s headquarters will include moving its entire facility and all employees to Texas.

“That’s an incredibly expensive decision to make,” Christopher Thornberg, the founding partner of Beacon Economics, said in a previous interview earlier this week. “(And) people who live here, live here for a reason — and you’re not going to convince a lot of these people to get up and move to Texas, simple as that.”

There’s also precedent for Musk companies leaving California to Texas — such as Tesla.

Few employees were compelled to move during that transition, and the car company still maintains a huge presence in the Bay Area, including a factory in Fremont that employs thousands of people.

Advertisement

But it’s not just Musk companies. When Toyota announced that it was planning to vacate its Torrance headquarters — also to move to Texas — in 2014, the city faced backlash from both state officials and residents for failing to keep the business, and about 3,000 jobs, in town.

But several years following the company’s official exit in 2017, the actual material impact on Torrance and the South Bay economies have been minimal at best.

The city’s revenues, officials said previously, were not seriously impacted by Toyota’s departure. Torrance was more impacted by the loss of the company as a sponsor of community events.

That’s likely because the South Bay economy — and Torrance’s in particular — is diverse, with various large malls, company headquarters and industries, as opposed to relying on one single major business.

It might be a different story for Hawthorne, though, should SpaceX completely pull out of the city.

Advertisement

“SpaceX has been an integral part of our community,” Vargas, the Hawthorne mayor, said, “contributing to our local economy and helping to establish Hawthorne as a hub of technological innovation.”

Hawthorne has done its fair share to persuade SpaceX to stay local.

In 2012, for example, the city approved a deal with SpaceX to cap its annual business license fees at $260,000 a year.

Those fees, typically, were calculated based on gross tax receipts — meaning the more revenue the company generated, the higher fees it would have to pay.

That deal, agreed upon through 2022, essentially allowed SpaceX to maintain a flat tax rate despite its continued growth.

Advertisement

City leaders, at the time, cited the deal as a way to incentivize SpaceX — which was already fielding offers to move to other states, including Texas and Florida — to stay in Hawthorne.

Hawthorne also agreed to reduce building and planning fees for SpaceX should the company decide to expand its local facilities by 75% of the normal cost.

The city also included a corporate citizenship clause in that economic development deal — which allowed the city to use the SpaceX logo in its own branding to promote community engagement with the company and vice versa.

It’s unclear whether that deal was re-approved by the Hawthorne City Council after it expired in 2022. The city did not respond to requests for comment on Wednesday.

But given Hawthorne’s seemingly strong reliance on SpaceX as a driver of the local economy — it’s possible the company’s departure could have more lasting impacts on the city.

Advertisement

Long Beach, for example, is still recovering from the shut down of Boeing’s C-17 Globemaster production facility, which shut down after the Department of Defense terminated its contract for the aircraft in 2015.

The closure of the facility, according to a 2021 city report, resulted in the loss of about 1,158 direct jobs and another 3,781 jobs in the related supply chain.

Since the last C-17 left Long Beach in 2015, the city has spent years figuring out a plan to redevelop the area, an approximate three-mile corridor bordering the Long Beach Airport.

The Long Beach City Council, in 2021, finally approved a finished version of the Globemaster Specific Corridor Plan — a nearly 200-page document that will guide the area’s redevelopment into a “21st Century employment district,” according to the city.

But even with the economic crater left in the absence of Boeing’s Long Beach presence, the city’s aerospace industry managed to survive with the launch of Virgin Orbit in 2017 — which spurred several other space companies to plant their roots in Long Beach, including Rocket Lab and Vast Space — despite Virgin’s own bankruptcy delivering another blow to the city last year.

Advertisement

But for Hawthorne, time will tell how SpaceX’s departure will change the city’s economy, job market, and regional importance.

“Despite this potential move, Hawthorne remains resilient and optimistic about the future,” Vargas said. “The city is dedicated to attracting new businesses, supporting existing ones, and continuing to foster an environment of innovation and opportunity.”

Bloomberg News contributed to this report.

Originally Published:



Source link

Advertisement

Texas

The Good, Bad and Ugly of Texas A&M’s Loss to Miami

Published

on

The Good, Bad and Ugly of Texas A&M’s Loss to Miami


No matter the accomplishments and accolades collected through the year, all seasons must come to end in some form or fashion. Unfortunately for Texas A&M football, the form of its first defeat in the College Football Playoff was in a tight 10-3 matchup with the Miami Hurricanes.

Despite of their best defensive outing of the 2025 campaign, the Aggies inability to get the offense churning until the very end of the game was among the factors that doomed their chances of advancing deeper into the national title race.

All things considered, it was a terrific season for the Maroon and White, who rattled off 11 straight wins to start the season as well as reaching the CFP for the first time in school history, which is a huge leap seeing that it was only head coach Mike Elko’s second season at the helm of the program. With that said, let’s take a look at the good, bad and ugly of the final A&M game of the year.

Advertisement

The Good: A precedent was set

Sep 27, 2025; College Station, Texas, USA; Texas A&M Aggies head coach Mike Elko reacts against the Auburn Tigers during the fourth quarter at Kyle Field. Mandatory Credit: Maria Lysaker-Imagn Images | Maria Lysaker-Imagn Images
Advertisement

Though the sting of a loss, especially a season-ending one, is a hard feeling to turn the page over with, an 11-2 run in Elko’s second year is a quite the feat. A&M, which hadn’t achieved 10 wins in a season in over a decade, is poised to build a long-standing prescence in the national title race.

Advertisement

Though a small sample size, Elko has progressed his time in each of the last two years, which can lead folks to assume that next year will have a similar outcome as far as overall success. While difficult to grasp in the moment, championship programs are not so quickly built in today’s Southeastern Conference.

The Bad: Offensive struggles spoil courageous defensive effort

Advertisement

Dec 20, 2025; College Station, TX, USA; Texas A&M Aggies safety Dalton Brooks (25) strips the ball from Miami Hurricanes wide receiver Malachi Toney (10) during the second half of the first round game of the CFP National Playoff at Kyle Field. Mandatory Credit: Jerome Miron-Imagn Images | Jerome Miron-Imagn Images

In most normal circumstances, holding a team to just 10 points typically results in a victory. But that was not the case for the Aggies on Saturday. Through the better part of a three-and-a-half quarters, the A&M defense held Miami to just three points until in the final two minutes when a touchdown was conceded.

The Aggies had no answer to their defense’s heroics and came up short in the final seconds of the game when there was a chance in the end zone to tie the ballgame. A new offensive coordinator in Holmon Wiggins is due up next season, so the jury is still out on how next year will pan out.

The Ugly: Kicking the ball

Advertisement

Sep 7, 2024; College Station, Texas, USA; Texas A&M Aggies place kicker Jared Zirkel (99) kicks during the second quarter against the McNeese State Cowboys at Kyle Field. Mandatory Credit: Dustin Safranek-Imagn Images | Dustin Safranek-Imagn Images

Sometimes, things can be so bad that they are simply comical. That would certainly be the case in College Station on Saturday afternoon, where a windy day helped a total of four field goal attempts to be missed across both squads.

Advertisement

However, the Aggie faithful would be the first to say that even without wind, field goal kicking seemed virtually impossible this season. Kicker Jared Zirkel seemingly kicked the ball straight in the Hurricanes line within the 30-yard line and the Aggies only scored off a short boot from kicker Randy Bond.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Texas

Johnny Manziel Replaced by a Different Texas A&M Great As ‘College GameDay’ Guest Picker

Published

on

Johnny Manziel Replaced by a Different Texas A&M Great As ‘College GameDay’ Guest Picker


ESPN’s College GameDay is pulling double duty this weekend for the College Football Playoff, airing ahead of last night’s Alabama win at Oklahoma and again this morning in College Station, Texas for Texas A&M’s opening-round game against Miami.

A pair of notorious college football legends were set to represent for their schools as guest pickers. Brian Bosworth was on hand in Norman, Okla. for Friday night’s show, while Heisman winner Johnny Manziel was set to serve as guest picker on Saturday. Evidently there’s been a change of plans with Johnny Football, as moments ago host Rece Davis former Aggies basketball star and two-time NBA champion Alex Caruso was announced as the show’s guest picker.

College GameDay has not announced a reason for the change, and has not announced it on social media.

Manziel has not comented about the change either. He shared a number of Instagram stories on Friday night from the Anthony Joshua-Jake Paul boxing match, which took place at the Kaseya Center in Miami.

Advertisement

Bleacher Report also promoted that Manziel was to appear on the outlet’s pregame show from Kyle Field, which livestreamed on YouTube at 10 a.m. ET. Manziel shared Bleacher Report’s Instagram post about his appearance to his stories on Friday night, but he did not appear on the Saturday show alongside Mike Golic Jr. and Ray G.

Manziel previously served as guest picker for the Aggies’ Week 1 game against Notre Dame. Caruso will be making his College GameDay debut.

Caruso is a College Station native who stayed home to star for the Aggiest basketball program from 2012 to ‘16, earning SEC All-Defensive Team and second-team All-SEC honors during his impressive college career. He left college as the program leader in assists and steals, and was the centerpiece of the 2015–16 team that made a run to the Sweet 16 of the NCAA tournament.

Caruso has gone on to become a valuable role player in the NBA. After going undrafted and beginning his career in the G League, Caruso played for the Lakers from 2017 to ‘21, winning the 2020 NBA Finals. He played in 21 playoff games, making one start during that title run, and averaged 6.5 points, 2.8 assists and 1.1 steals per game.

He continued his career with the Bulls from 2021 to ‘24, scoring a career high 10.1 points per game in his final season with Chicago. Following the 2023–24 season, he was traded to the Thunder, and was a crucial piece to the dominant 2024–25 Oklahoma City title team, averaging 7.1 points per game through the regular season and playing some of his best ball in the playoffs, with 9.2 points and two steals per game during the title run.

Advertisement

Caruso did not score 20 points once during the regular season for OKC, but did it twice in the Thunder’s Finals win over the Pacers, making NBA history in the process.

Oklahoma City made clear how valuable he is after the season, signing Caruso to a guaranteed four-year, $81 million contract extension.

This is a developing story. Check back for more updates.

More College Football on Sports Illustrated

SI BTN Newsletter. Start off your day with SI:CYMI. dark. FREE NEWSLETTER





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Texas

Kentucky vs. Texas A&M: Time, TV channel, preview for DI women’s volleyball championship

Published

on

Kentucky vs. Texas A&M: Time, TV channel, preview for DI women’s volleyball championship


From the 64 teams selected to compete in the NCAA DI women’s volleyball tournament, just No. 1 Kentucky and No. 3 Texas A&M remain. Reaching the national championship is no small feat, from Dec. 4 all the way to Dec. 18, these two programs have battled to etch their names into history. 

Let’s take a look on how the Wildcats and the Aggies punched their tickets to the national final. 

No. 1 Kentucky ROUND NO. 3 TEXAS A&M
Def. Wofford, 3-0 First Def. Campbell, 3-0
Def. UCLA, 3-1 Second Def. No. 6 TCU, 3-0 
Def. Cal Poly, 3-0 Regional semifinals Def. No. 2 Louisville, 3-2
Def. No. 3 Creighton, 3-0 Regional finals Def. No. 1 Nebraska, 3-2
Def. No. 3 Wisconsin, 3-2 National semifinals Def. No. 1 Pitt, 3-0

👉 Check out the full schedule, scores from the 2025 women’s volleyball tournament

No. 1 Kentucky (30-2)

Big Blue fought for a dramatic five-setter victory over No. 3 Wisconsin to earn its second ever national championship appearance and first since their 2021 national title. The Badgers seemed to have all control after a Set 1 25-12 victory, but Kentucky wouldn’t be denied. Eva Hudson was on fire, accruing 29 kills on .455 hitting, while Molly Tuozzo’s back-court defense—with 17 critical digs—fought off a career night from Mimi Colyer. 

Advertisement

No. 3 Texas A&M (28-4)

The Aggies knocked off No. 1 Pitt in three straight sets, continuing their historic season by earning the program’s first-ever national championship appearance. Kyndal Stowers powered the Maroon and White with 16 kills on .433 hitting while setter Maddie Waak orchestrated her balanced offense to an impressive .382 clip, with four different Aggies earning at least eight put-aways. 

Both programs are heating up at just the right time, priming Sunday’s matchup to be an intense face-off between SEC foes. Make sure to  follow the action here on NCAA.com at 3:30 p.m. ET. 



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending