Connect with us

Texas

Texas border effort gets $495 million boost after GOP leaders tap federal COVID-19 aid, shift funds

Published

on

Texas border effort gets $495 million boost after GOP leaders tap federal COVID-19 aid, shift funds


AUSTIN — Texas is scrambling to give you almost a half-billion {dollars} to pay the rising tab for its determination to submit Nationwide Guard troopers on the southern border.

As foreshadowed by a prime aide to Gov. Greg Abbott earlier this month, Texas will liberate general-purpose state income that lawmakers beforehand budgeted for salaries of state staff by tapping federal coronavirus aid cash.

That may enable GOP state leaders to hurry $465.3 million to the Texas Army Division, whose prime chief has stated he’ll run out of cash on the finish of this month for the ten,000 troops who’re supporting Abbott’s Operation Lone Star. Different state businesses concerned with the border effort will share within the switch of one other $30 million.

On Friday, Abbott, Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, Speaker Dade Phelan, Senate Finance Committee Chairwoman Joan Huffman and Home Appropriations Committee Chairman Greg Bonnen signed a letter to the heads of six state businesses approving the fund shifts. The letter didn’t acknowledge use of federal pandemic-relief funds, as an alternative focusing solely on the simultaneous reassignment of state general-purpose income {dollars}.

Advertisement

“These transfers are supposed to assist the deployment of the Nationwide Guard with $465.3 million and to assist border safety surge operations in different state businesses with $30 million,” the leaders wrote. “We perceive the Fiscal Years 2020-2021 appropriations would in any other case lapse and be unavailable to your businesses, and that the Fiscal 12 months 2022 appropriations have been absolutely funded with different sources, thus this switch is not going to have an effect on any company or program perform.”

In a joint information launch, the state GOP leaders blasted President Joe Biden for what Phelan referred to as “irresponsible” dealing with of immigration coverage.

The six businesses will fork over $248.8 million of state basic income from the fiscal 12 months that ended Aug. 31, and simply over $246.5 million from the present 12 months’s funds.

The cash goes to Abbott’s catastrophe fund, from which he’s been repeatedly transmitting cash for the Texas Nationwide Guard and Texas State Guard’s assist of the Republican governor’s immigration dragnet on the border with Mexico, in keeping with information obtained by The Dallas Morning Information utilizing the state’s open-records legislation.

Whereas some Democrats have fretted that Texas could also be misusing federal COVID-19 aid assist to assist finance Operation Lone Star, Abbott and prime GOP lawmakers have denied that. The Biden administration hasn’t objected, nor has anybody taken Texas to courtroom over its cash maneuvers.

Advertisement

The sequence of payments Congress handed through the pandemic, signed by each Biden and former President Donald Trump, allowed states to make use of their federal funds for salaries of state public well being and public security workers.

In early April, Sarah Hicks, director of coverage and funds in Abbott’s workplace, advised the Senate Committee on Border Safety the state may make up for shortfalls within the border safety effort through the use of as much as $600 million of the federal {dollars} to backfill salaries at well being, legislation enforcement and jail businesses, after which switch the freed-up state discretionary {dollars} to the border effort.

Federal ‘clawback’ worries

It’s a transfer that strikes some as misuse and one they fear may put the cash vulnerable to being clawed again by the federal authorities.

On April 8, although, Phelan, a Beaumont Republican who’s the Home’s presiding officer, stated his chamber “will take an extended, exhausting, deep dive in how we’re spending {dollars} and we’ll … make sure the federal clawback is [in the] entrance of our thoughts.”

The issue arose as a result of final 12 months, at the same time as they had been greater than quadrupling the state’s stage of spending on border safety, lawmakers gave the Texas Army Division solely $412 million for the present two-year cycle. In simply the primary 12 months of the cycle alone, it’s costing no less than $1.3 billion to maintain a number of thousand troopers on the border and hundreds of others in assist roles elsewhere.

Advertisement

If that’s repeated within the fiscal 12 months that begins Sept. 1, the state’s tab for border safety will soar previous $5 billion, from $800 million final cycle.

Of their letter Friday, Abbott and the 4 prime GOP legislative leaders stated the state general-purpose income that the six businesses had been providing has “been absolutely funded with different sources.” They didn’t elaborate.

Of their previous letters providing to yield the cash, company heads appointed by Abbott used variations of a theme acknowledged this week by Division of Public Security director Col. Steve McCraw, in his newest request to surrender cash.

“It’s vital that the Catastrophe Fund [in Abbott’s office] have enough monies out there to reply shortly and make sure the security of Texans,” McCraw wrote. “I can verify the company and its applications is not going to be negatively affected by this switch.”

After a January switch of $480.5 million from businesses that run state prisons and carry out legislation enforcement capabilities, to pay for the Nationwide Guard deployment, the brand new head of the Guard, Maj. Gen. Thomas Suelzer, advised senators earlier this month that cash would run out on the finish of April. He wanted $531 million extra to fund the Guard’s a part of Operation Lone Star via Aug. 31, Suelzer testified.

Advertisement
Texas’ top Republican leaders late last month moved $486 million dollars from three law...

Since then, apparently, the Guard’s shortfall has shrunk barely.

Yielding the cash had been the Well being and Human Providers Fee, $210.7 million; Division of Public Security, $159.3 million; Texas Division of Felony Justice, $53.6 million; Division of State Well being Providers, $36.1 million; Texas Juvenile Justice Division, $31.3 million; and Texas Alcoholic Beverage Fee, $4.3 million.

Within the first few months of the Guard’s border mission, experiences emerged of issues with pay, a scarcity of kit and a string of suicides inside the ranks. In response, the army division issued a morale survey and pledged to deal with the problems.

This week, Abbott downplayed the issues.

“The criticisms had been overblown,” he advised Man Benson of Fox Information Radio. “Had been there some pay points? Sure, however they had been extraordinarily small in quantity.”

Abbott attributed Guard glitches to a surge of 14,000 Haitian migrants to Del Rio in September – a circumstance he says he couldn’t enable to be repeated.

Advertisement

“I stated that we can not have one other Haitian disaster like that ever happen,” he stated. “And so there needed to be an awfully fast deployment that led to, let’s say, a much less environment friendly rollout than what you’ll usually see.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Texas

Texas Rangers closer Kirby Yates has All-Star case, even without lighting up the radar gun

Published

on

Texas Rangers closer Kirby Yates has All-Star case, even without lighting up the radar gun


BALTIMORE — A philosophical question: If a closer doesn’t hit 100 mph, can he still get noticed? You know, kind of like a tree falling in the woods. If nobody sees it, did it actually happen?

We may get an answer to that question in the next week when All-Star rosters are revealed. Rangers closer Kirby Yates has seemingly done everything necessary to make the AL All-Star team, other than light up a radar gun.

Marcus Semien only Texas Ranger moving on in All-Star Game voting

As players wrap up their voting for the All-Star pitching staffs this weekend, choosing three relievers, it’s hard to make a convincing case against Yates reaching the medal stand. Unless, of course, you factor in his fastball. It doesn’t light up Statcast metrics. It’s only good for getting him ahead in counts and setting up his devastating forkball. Among qualified relievers, Yates’ 93.1 mph average fastball ranks only 60th in the AL. The guys getting all the national buzz are Oakland’s Mason Miller and his 100.8 mph fastball and AL saves leader Emmanuel Clase with his 99.8 mph heater.

Rangers

Advertisement

Be the smartest Rangers fan. Get the latest news.

“I know I don’t have a fastball that lights up the radar guns,” Yates said. “But the league is filled with stuff and guys who are throwers. Guys who pitch are the outliers. But if you pitch and execute your pitches, you can be successful. I don’t think that will ever go away.”

He has pitched exceptionally well. There is not a performance-based stat in which he is weak. He began Saturday perfect in his 11 save chances this year, the only AL reliever with at least 10 opportunities and no blown saves. His ERA (0.99) was second. His batting average allowed (.134) was second. He had a WHIP below 1.00 (0.95).

Put this another way. He is the only pitcher in baseball — regardless of league — to begin the statistical second-half of the season perfect on at least 10 save chances, with a WHIP and ERA both below 1.00. There is more. He’s averaging 12.07 strikeouts per nine innings thanks to a filthy splitter and hasn’t allowed a homer.

The closest comp to Yates from a year ago was Minnesota’s Jhoan Duran, who ended June with 11 saves in 13 chances, a 1.91 ERA and a 0.94 ERA. Perhaps, it’s not best to bring this up. Duran still didn’t make the All-Star team. There were six relievers either selected or named as replacements. It included each of the top five in saves and Baltimore’s Yennier Cano, who had a 1.14 ERA and 0.86 WHIP entering July. Moral of the story: Yates’ relatively low number of saves may work against him.

Advertisement

If other players rely on a singular number such as saves or WAR, Yates may get overlooked. He is tied for 11th in the AL in saves and is eighth in WAR among AL relievers at 1.0, though only three-tenths of a win separates him from the No. 2 spot, which belongs to Clase.

On the other hand, if AL manager Bruce Bochy has any input, Yates will get a firm endorsement. That doesn’t carry the weight it once did. Once upon a time, the manager had a big hand in selecting the pitching staff. Now, it’s almost entirely reliant on peer votes. Bochy said this week that he would heartily endorse Yates as a reliever.

So, too, will David Robertson, the AL’s senior reliever at age 39. Robertson was an All-Star in 2010 as a setup man with the New York Yankees.

“His case is great,” said Robertson, who has a pretty solid case of his own. “His WHIP is good. His strikeouts are high. If you aren’t giving up walks and hits and you are striking out guys, what else are you supposed to do? I hope he goes.”

Yates admits it, he’d like to. He’s been an All-Star before and was even named the NL’s closer in 2019. Only problem: NL didn’t have a lead. He didn’t pitch. Since then: He missed most of three seasons with elbow issues and eventually surgery.

Advertisement

“I think making the team would validate a lot of things,” Yates said. “I’d love a chance to pitch, but the fact that I was named the closer that year was a real sign of respect and I appreciated that. In a perfect world, you’d get a chance to do both.”

And if everybody sees it, well, then it definitely happened.

Twitter: @Evan_P_Grant

    Rangers nightmare scenario? An injured Corey Seager may mark end of Texas’ chances in 2024
    Texas Rangers SS Corey Seager’s initial X-rays negative after HBP to left wrist

Find more Rangers coverage from The Dallas Morning News here.

Click or tap here to sign up for our Rangers newsletter.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Texas

Two Texas jail guards are indicted by a county grand jury in the asphyxiation death of an inmate

Published

on

Two Texas jail guards are indicted by a county grand jury in the asphyxiation death of an inmate


Two county jail guards have been indicted on murder charges for the asphyxiation death of an inmate in Texas.

The indictments, dated Tuesday, charge Joel Garcia, 48, and Rafael Moreno Jr., 37, in the April death of 31-year-old former Marine Anthony Johnson Jr. at the Tarrant County jail in Fort Worth.

Attorneys for Garcia or Moreno did not immediately return phone calls and text messages for comment Friday.

Randy Moore, an attorney for Garcia, has previously said that Garcia’s role in the fight was limited and that the use of force was necessary.

Advertisement

“The wheels of justice continue to turn in this case,” Sheriff Bill Waybourn said in a statement. “I said from the beginning that we hold accountable anyone responsible for Mr. Johnson’s death and we are doing that.”

Waybourn, who has said Moreno wrongly placed his knee on Johnson’s back after Johnson was handcuffed and that Garcia was the supervisor, initially fired the two, but both were reinstated and placed on paid leave because the sheriff’s office said the dismissals did not follow official protocol.

The force used in Johnson’s death is intended to stop and subdue people without killing them, yet increasingly it has come under scrutiny following the 2020 death of George Floyd.

Floyd died after a Minneapolis police officer restrained him face down on the ground for nine minutes and pinned a knee to the back of Floyd’s neck, an incident that sparked outrage nationwide.

The family of Johnson, who had been arrested two days before his death for allegedly using a knife to threaten the driver of a vehicle, has called for a federal investigation of the jail. The family has told the Fort Worth Star-Telegram that Johnson was suffering from a mental health crisis.

Advertisement

On Friday, four Missouri prison guards were charged with murder, and a fifth with accessory to involuntary manslaughter, in the December death of a Black man who was pepper-sprayed, had his face covered with a mask and was left in a position that caused him to suffocate.



Source link

Continue Reading

Texas

Texas Supreme Court upholds state ban on gender transition treatment for minors

Published

on

Texas Supreme Court upholds state ban on gender transition treatment for minors


The Texas Supreme Court on Friday upheld the state’s ban on gender transition treatment for children, allowing the Lone Star State to remain one of at least 25 states, and the largest, with restrictions on such treatment.

The law, which has been in effect since Sept. 1, 2023, prohibits children under the age of 18 from accessing hormone therapy, puberty blockers and gender transition surgery. Children who were already on those medications were required to taper off their use of the drugs. The law includes exemptions for children in early puberty or who have “a medically verifiable genetic disorder of sex development.”

The lawsuit that challenged the law argued it harms transgender teenagers who are barred from receiving gender transition treatment recommended by their physicians and parents, according to The Associated Press.

The court, comprised of all Republicans, handed down its ruling in an 8-1 decision.

Advertisement

JUDGE RULES MONTANA LAW DEFINING SEX AS ONLY MALE OR FEMALE IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL

The Texas Supreme Court on Friday upheld the state’s ban on gender transition treatment for children. (AP)

“We conclude the Legislature made a permissible, rational policy choice to limit the types of available medical procedures for children, particularly in light of the relative nascency of both gender dysphoria and its various modes of treatment and the Legislature’s express constitutional authority to regulate the practice of medicine,” Justice Rebeca Aizpuru Huddle wrote.

The lone dissenting judge said the court was giving the state’s government the ability to “legislate away fundamental parental rights.”

“The State’s categorical statutory prohibition prevents these parents, and many others, from developing individualized treatment plans for their children in consultation with their physicians, even the children for whom treatment could be lifesaving,” Justice Debra Lehrmann wrote. “The law is not only cruel — it is unconstitutional.”

Advertisement

A lower court had ruled the law unconstitutional, but it was permitted to take effect during the state Supreme Court’s consideration of the case.

Texas Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton tweeted after the ruling that his office “will use every tool at our disposal to ensure that doctors and medical institutions follow the law.”

'Protect Trans Youth' protesters

The law prohibits children under the age of 18 from accessing hormone therapy, puberty blockers and gender transition surgery. (Fox News )

The groups who filed the lawsuit criticized the ruling as harmful to transgender children and their families.

“It is impossible to overstate the devastating impact of this ruling on Texas transgender youth and the families that love and support them,” Karen Loewy, senior counsel and director of Constitutional Law Practice at Lambda Legal, which was one of the groups that sued the state on behalf of doctors and families, told The Associated Press.

ACLU of Texas’ policy and advocacy strategist for LGBTQIA+ rights, Ash Hall, said the government should not “deprive trans youth of the health care that they need to survive and thrive,” adding that “Texas politicians’ obsession with attacking trans kids and their families is needlessly cruel.”

Advertisement

Gender transition treatment for transgender children is supported by major medical organizations, including the American Medical Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Psychiatric Association and the Endocrine Society.

BRAGG’S OFFICE FACES BAR COMPLAINT ALLEGING DISCRIMINATION IN ‘DIVERSITY’ HIRING PRACTICES

Transgender pride flag

The lawsuit that challenged the law argued it harms transgender teenagers who are barred from receiving gender transition treatment recommended by their physicians and parents. (ALLISON DINNER/AFP via Getty Images)

One justice dismissed the medical groups’ position as irrelevant to whether the Texas law is constitutional.

“The fact that expert witnesses or influential interest groups like the American Psychiatric Association disagree with the Legislature’s judgment is entirely irrelevant to the constitutional question,” Justice James Blacklock wrote in a concurring opinion. “The Texas Constitution authorizes the Legislature to regulate ‘practitioners of medicine.’”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

In a lower court hearing, several doctors who treat transgender children testified that patients could face deteriorating mental health that could potentially lead to suicide if they are denied gender transition treatment.

Texas officials said the law was needed to protect children and pointed to several other restrictions for minors intended to keep them safe, including when it comes to tattoos, alcohol, tobacco and certain over-the-counter drugs.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending