Connect with us

Texas

Should States Like Texas Be Allowed to Grade Their Own Highway Homework? — Streetsblog USA

Published

on

Should States Like Texas Be Allowed to Grade Their Own Highway Homework? — Streetsblog USA


In late October, protestors in Houston watched as officials wheeled a trough out into the middle of St. Emanuel Street and each scooped out a ceremonial shovelful of sand.

The officials were ostensibly there for a symbolic groundbreaking for the North Houston Highway Improvement Project, which will widen or rebuild around 25 miles of Interstate 45 in the heart of Texas’s largest city. For the protesters, though, the bulldozers that loomed in the background of that photo-op were a very real threat of the harm soon to come to St. Emanuel Street, and the estimated 1,079 homes, 344 businesses, five places of worship and two schools that will be razed to make way for the highway.

“Half of that street is going to be gone,” added Erin Eriksen, an organizer with Stop TxDOT I-45. “Half of those businesses are going to be torn down. And TxDOT was basically thumbing its nose at these places that were going to be destroyed because of this project.”

According to official analyses, though, the destruction of St. Emanuel Street and so many like it isn’t enough of an “environmental impact” to justify canceling the I-45 project, even though it will dramatically exacerbate pollution, flooding, and inequality in the disproportionately low income communities of color through which the expansion will largely run.

Advertisement

And that’s probably because the Texas Department of Transportation wrote those official analyses itself.

‘A fox guarding a hen house”

Thanks to a little-known loophole in federal law known as the “NEPA assignment” program, DOTs from Texas and six other states — Alaska, Arizona, California, Florida, Ohio, and Utah — are temporarily “assigned” the responsibility of conducting what are normally federally overseen environmental assessments (the states must reapply every five years when their authority expires. Texas’s authority expires this year, and members of the Texas Streets Coalition are urging advocates to comment on whether it should be rescinded before Dec. 9.)

In theory, NEPA assignment is supposed to help responsible state DOTs build projects quickly, without having to wait on a single understaffed federal agency to work through a backlog of proposals from across the country before giving the green light on simple repaving or repair. Some argue that it also gives environmentally progressive states an opportunity to conduct an even more thorough analysis than the feds would do on their own.

In car-dominated Texas, though, NEPA assignment is essentially a “fox-guarding-the-henhouse situation” — and its consequences shouldn’t be surprising to anyone, argues Heyden Black Walker of Reconnect Austin.

In Walker’s native Austin, for instance, advocates say that Texas DOT misleadingly “segmented” the expansion of a single intestate known as I-35 into three smaller projects along the exactly same road, hiding the staggering impacts the expansion would have for the region on the whole — and, advocates say, violating federal law. Walker says the “9,000 pages” of official documents about the project also didn’t adequately consider the highway’s impacts on air pollution, and failed to study whether railway investments could address the same problems the expansion was meant to solve.

Advertisement

That the I-35 expansion received even that degree of scrutiny, though, is something of an outlier.

Texas activists found that between 2015 and 2022, only six TxDOT projects receive a full-blown “environmental impact statement,” an exhaustive process that details exactly how the agency will mitigate the harm it will cause. A staggering 130 projects, by comparison, only received a far-simpler “environmental assessment,” all of which resulted in a “finding of no significant impact,” or FONSI, which is pronounced like the shark-jumping character on “Happy Days.”

Cumulatively, though, those “insignificant” projects displaced a stunning total of 477 homes and 376 businesses, and consumed $24 billion. And advocates say that lack of oversight is particularly damning for a state that would rank eighth in the world for carbon dioxide emissions if it were a country, and that polluted nearly twice as much as second-ranked California in 2019.

“The things that NEPA was intended to protect us from — from inordinate displacement, from worse air quality — Texas is failing on all of those metrics,” said Peter Eccles, director of policy and planning at LINK Houston, a transportation advocacy group. “Since TxDOT entered NEPA assignment in 2014, displacements have skyrocketed across Texas, dwarfing the national average in terms of how many households are displaced for freeway projects, as well as the number of counties that are no longer in attainment for criteria pollutants. … It’s not working as intended.”

Highway-related displacements have skyrocketed in Texas compared to the national average since the state was issued a memorandum of understanding (MOU) granting it authority to conduct its now environmental assessments. Graphic: Texas Transportation Coalition.

If the federal government was conducting the NEPA process, advocates argue that Texas might face stricter parameters for what constitutes a “significant” impact of a highway project, rather than letting the state write off families losing their homes and residents getting sick as unfortunate but necessary evils. And maybe, bad projects might even be stopped before they start.

Advertisement

“TxDOT is setting up its own environmental reviews, setting its own parameters, and then self-grading its own performance by the parameters that it sets,” said Bobby Levinski, an attorney with the Save Our Springs Alliance. “And we don’t have that federal oversight that used to exist where, if you did have a disagreement over what the current state of the science is, [you might have] a technical expert at the federal level who could say, ‘No, you didn’t quite do a good enough job looking at, say, this air quality aspect.’

“That check no longer exists,” he continued. “And at the end of the day, they’re going to give themselves an ‘A.’”

NEPA Assignment Under Trump

Levinski and the rest of the coalition acknowledge that some might be wary of handing environmental power back to the federal government — especially with Trump returning to the White House.

Project 2025, which many believe will serve as the incoming president’s playbook, promises to restore regulations limiting environmental review that Trump put in place the last time he was in office, as well as “frame the new regulations to limit the scope for judicial review of agency NEPA analysis and judicial remedies.”

Advocates in Texas, though, say they’re already living in a world where NEPA has been badly watered down — and because of their state’s special authority, Washington was powerless to intervene. Restoring federal oversight, they argue, is a critical first step to making things right, followed by voting in a presidential administration that takes NEPA seriously.

Advertisement

“Here in Texas, we’ve been facing basically a mini-Trump administration, anyway, with our governor,” said Katy Atkiss, facilitator for the Texas Streets Coalition, referring to Gov. Greg Abbott. “He appoints the Texas Transportation Commission, which is basically five old white men — none with transportation experience. So I feel like we’ve been working in a similar environment anyway. We’ve had several conversations with DOT and other federal representatives throughout the course of of the year, and while they are extremely sympathetic, basically, they said, ‘We believe you, but there’s nothing we can do.’”

Until Texas’s NEPA assignment is revoked, all advocates can do is sue to stop bad projects — though with the president picking many of the judges, that’s an increasingly bleak prospect, too.

“With Trump being in office, the courts aren’t getting easier either,” added Levinski. “[And] making the public be the enforcer of NEPA, I think, puts a big onus on the residents of Texas to go up against the giant Goliath that is TxDOT on every single case. … We need some sort of measure of oversight. You can’t just write off the entire state of Texas.”

The members of the Texas Streets coalition acknowledge that getting their state’s NEPA assignment revoked won’t be easy — and if it can’t be done, they hope USDOT will at least make some common-sense changes.

The state might still be allowed do its own environmental assessments, but not on massive highway projects that displace hundreds of residents. The feds also might force the DOT to wait at least 30 days to collect public comment after they make changes to their plans, or submit to “an annual NEPA compliance audit” to ensure they’re not flouting federal laws. At a minimum, they could acknowledge that granting states like Texas the ability to do their own environmental review even as they’re suing to hide their greenhouse gas emissions from the public seems like a pretty obvious flaw in the system.

Advertisement

At the end of the day, though, advocates say we need to address the shortcomings of NEPA itself, which still doesn’t factor in the power of induced demand — and still offers all states too many opportunities to build destructive highways, even when the federal government is grading their projects.

“I think that NEPA assignment and its abuses by TxDOT are a symptom of the larger failings of NEPA as a whole,” added Eccles. “NEPA was very well intentioned at the time [it was written], but certain states like TxDOT have gotten very good at gaming it to rubber stamp projects that they want to do regardless. Contrast that with the NEPA burden that the Federal Transit Administration puts on transit projects; it’s much more rigorous, and it ends up slowing down those projects significantly. We need to have a clearer picture of what projects benefit the environment and which projects harm it.”



Source link

Texas

Hands-on telehealth helps reach rural Texas communities

Published

on

Hands-on telehealth helps reach rural Texas communities


Subscribe to The Y’all — a weekly dispatch about the people, places and policies defining Texas, produced by Texas Tribune journalists living in communities across the state.

A shipping container in Fort Davis is at the center of a new experiment in bringing telehealth to an aging rural population.

Perched in the Davis Mountains of West Texas, Jeff Davis County faces steep barriers to care. Nearly one in five residents lacks reliable broadband. The only doctor in Fort Davis, the county seat, is semi-retired, and most people make the 30-minute drive to Alpine for care. With a median age of 58, among the highest in the country, the need for consistent medical care is growing, even as access, both in-person and virtually, remains a challenge. 

The retrofitted 40-foot container houses the new Davis Mountain Clinic in Fort Davis, a telehealth hub created through a partnership between Texas A&M and Texas Tech universities to connect residents with remote medical and mental health professionals.

Advertisement

But for rural Texas, expanding telehealth for aging populations depends on more than video calls. It requires reliable broadband, digital literacy for older residents, trusted community health workers, and practical ways for clinicians to weave virtual visits into everyday care.

Since opening in October 2025, the Davis Mountain Clinic has added something many rural telehealth programs lack: a physical place with reliable connectivity and a local registered nurse, Carol Brewer, who can take vital signs, perform physical exams, and guide patients through virtual visits with providers who may be hundreds of miles away. 

Brewer, who is also the director of the clinic, said this approach creates a whole new world of access for the community, especially for older patients who may feel less comfortable navigating virtual appointments. 

“The majority of the patients I see are part of an older population,” Brewer said. “The advantage is, when they come here to see the doctor, I manage the technology on my end, they don’t have to deal with that at all…I’m the hands of the physician via telehealth. I have a stethoscope and an otoscope. So they can hear their lung sounds, heart sounds, bowel sounds, or look in their eyes, ears, nose. I facilitate that.”

Inside the Davis Mountain Clinic, an exam room allows patients to be seen by virtual physicians and specialists with in-person support from a registered nurse. (Photo by Carol Brewer)
Advertisement

Brewer’s hands-on approach highlights how telehealth can be tailored to the realities of an older, rural population, where technology alone isn’t enough, and personal guidance can make the difference between care received and care missed.

“People who live in rural areas are older, sicker, and poorer than people who live in urban areas. Because of that, there are absolutely practical applications for telehealth and its clinical applications,” said Billy U. Philips, PhD, the former executive vice president of the The F. Marie Hall Institute for Rural and Community Health and current Grover E. Murray Professor at Texas Tech University. “But when you overlay with age dimension, then the delivery of care is really going to depend on local and personal circumstances.” 

Brewer sees the importance of local connection and community in her work every day. 

“I had a patient that came and saw the doctor [virtually] yesterday. His wife had dropped him off, and I gave him a ride home afterwards, because his wife had to go down to Alpine,” Brewer said. “There are just things that we can do for the patients that they’re not going to get anywhere else.”

Brewer said that even though the county has just 1,200 residents, she often sees several patients each day. Some come for virtual appointments, while others need help managing aging-related care, navigating insurance, or even obtaining copies of their medical records.

Advertisement

“I had a patient whose daughter came by and said she didn’t think her mom looked well, and her vehicle was out of commission, so she couldn’t get her to the doctor. I went to their home and checked on her mom, and sure enough, her oxygen levels were low and she wasn’t wearing her oxygen,” Brewer said. “We got her back on [the oxygen] and stabilized her, and while I was there, I called to set up a doctor’s appointment. The daughter was arranging another way to get her mom to the doctor. It’s a small community, so if they can’t come to me, I go to them.”

This hybrid delivery of care offers hands-on support while also connecting a rural community to specialists and providers in different corners of the state. 

The Davis Mountain Clinic has a designated room for mental health consultations and appointments. (Photo by Carol Brewer)

Technology challenges

A 2025 report from the Texas Broadband Development Office found that Jeff Davis County faces significant broadband challenges due to its small, aging population, mountainous terrain, and high proportion of residents with disabilities or limited English proficiency. These factors make deploying reliable, affordable internet costly and complex, often requiring public subsidies to make broadband expansion feasible. 

But these hurdles aren’t unique to Jeff Davis County. 

In rural parts of Texas’s Coastal Bend, along the Texas Gulf Coast, available broadband is not equivalent to reliable broadband. 

Advertisement

“Even if you pay for the platinum packages, you may at best receive only so-so service,” said Amy Kiddy Villarreal, director of the Coastal Bend Aging and Disability Resource Center. “Internet availability and quality are among the biggest hurdles [to accessing telehealth].” 

Philips said that across rural Texas, broadband is often limited, unreliable, and costly, creating obstacles for telehealth and other digital services. While commercial expansion may improve access over the next decade, for now some residents rely on shared community spaces, like clinics, senior centers, and libraries, to get online. 

These hubs not only provide connectivity but can also offer guidance for older or less tech-savvy residents, helping them navigate the digital tools they need for health care and daily life.

Highlighting the practical challenges of expanding connectivity, Philips emphasized the need for flexible solutions that give rural residents real choice: “The question now is: how do we get things done in such a way that rural populations have choice and have competitive pricing, and have places where they can have access, even if it isn’t in their home?” he said.

This effort is underway in the Coast Bend region. 

Advertisement

“Coastal Bend Council of Governments’ new broadband planning effort is working to bring better, faster internet to the parts of the Coastal Bend that need it most and will make telehealth visits more available and dependable for older adults,” Villarreal said. “By identifying where service is lacking and collaborating with local health care providers and community leaders, this plan lays out the groundwork for more reliable telehealth at home and in trusted community spaces. Together, these improvements help ensure that people in rural areas can access the care they need, when they need it.

Digital literacy promotes health

Across rural Texas, distance is more than a matter of miles, it can be the difference between receiving timely care or going without it. In the Permian Basin, a region in southwestern Texas, older adults can travel hours for a routine doctor’s visit. Limited broadband access, few primary care providers, and scarce public transportation create steep barriers.

Alma Montes, director of Area Agency on Aging of the Permian Basin, is tackling these issues head-on with a commitment to helping older people in rural Texas age in place.

“In these rural towns, they really are the best places to age. In all my years doing this work, smaller communities are where you want to be when you’re older. You can drive longer, there’s no traffic, and everything, from your house to the senior center, is just a few blocks away,” Montes said. “You feel empowered longer. You’re connected to a community where people check in on you, know your routine, and notice if something’s off. It’s just a shame primary care isn’t there for them, because it truly is a great place to grow old.”

In these Permian Basin communities, social cohesion is strong, but health infrastructure is thin. Residents lean on neighbors and family, yet often have to leave town for basic services. Montes found that older adults’ struggles with telehealth weren’t just about access to broadband or devices. 

Advertisement

Through a partnership with Aetna, her team distributed tablets and trained about 50 seniors to use email and access virtual care. The bigger barrier wasn’t connectivity, she said; it was unfamiliarity. Many older residents were wary of technology they haven’t used before, making ongoing support essential for the successful implementation of telehealth. 

Montes said that investing in these skills, tools, and community partnerships paid dividends beyond just telehealth access. 

“We want to improve their overall well-being. Even if we didn’t fully get them to telehealth, there were gains along the way. They can now email family, send and receive photos, connect on social media, even Skype with loved ones. And we know, especially after COVID, that social connection has a real impact on health,” Montes said. “So even if they’re not all doing telehealth visits, they’re using technology in ways that positively affect their health.”

Community health workers

In many rural communities, and particularly among immigrant families, concerns about privacy, scams, and surveillance shape how residents engage with new systems. That’s where trusted local resources, like community health workers, become essential.

Community health workers are trained, certified locals who help residents navigate care, connect to services and access basic health support.

Advertisement

“Out in these rural communities, part of the [telehealth implementation] has to do with trust and whether you know the person,” Philips said. “Some patients have heritages that make them potential targets for law enforcement operations or other authorities. So you need a trusted figure–a navigator or community health worker–that’s known to that community and trusted. We equip those individuals to serve as a bridge, helping people understand and use the technology available to them.”

Training programs across rural Texas aim to expand the pool of community health workers and equip them both to be a local resource and a facilitator to accessing more expansive care virtually. 

Practicing telemedicine

For Dr. Ariel Santos, a trauma and acute care surgeon and director of the Texas Tech Telemedicine Program, telemedicine allows him to triage patients across rural West Texas, determining when situations demand air ambulances or when a patient can be treated locally. 

“As a trauma surgeon, I’d rather be consulted earlier when there’s a trauma patient,” Dr. Santos said. “Telemedicine can be used to triage patients…It can either expedite treatment, or it can help determine that a patient doesn’t need to be transferred.”

Dr. Santos said these calls can save tens of thousands of dollars in unnecessary medical transfers and also reduce the number of visits a patient has to make as they receive continuity of care. 

Advertisement

“I could use [telemedicine] to pre-op the patient, meaning to prepare them before seeing them in person,” Dr. Santos said. “And postoperatively, I could see the patient and check on the wound easily, without them needing to spend time and money traveling.” 

Dr. Santos also sees telemedicine’s potential beyond trauma. One key example is Project ECHO (Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes), a virtual collaboration model designed to support rural providers in caring for complex patients. 

In rural Texas, caring for older adults with dementia often means working without nearby specialists. The Dementia Care ECHO program uses a hub-and-spoke structure, connecting geriatric experts at a central “hub” with local primary care teams, long-term care staff, and community providers, the “spokes,” through virtual sessions. Multidisciplinary teams, including doctors, dietitians, pharmacists, and social workers, guide providers through real patient cases, helping them deliver specialized care that might otherwise be out of reach.

“Through the ECHO program, we can leverage geriatricians’ speciality using technology,” Dr. Santos said. 

For patients and caregivers, it brings expert support closer to home, though limited broadband continues to challenge access in many communities.

Advertisement

The future of rural telehealth

Telehealth offers an alternative pathway for delivering care for both patients and providers. However, experts warned that telehealth should not be seen as a replacement for in-person care, but rather a supplemental service that expands access, especially for rural populations. 

“Telehealth is not a substitute for good, high quality primary care,” said Brock Slabach, chief operations officer at the National Rural Health Association (NRHA). “So in my opinion, it should be delivered as a tool for primary care and for specialists to be able to enhance the care continuum and hopefully, in many cases, reduce the need for in-person visits.” 

The Davis Mountain Clinic offers one example of balancing telehealth with in-person care delivery. 

“I think it’s a great model for other rural communities,” Brewer said. “The physicians we work with are very supportive. They’re very helpful, and they are also invested beyond just the services that they’re providing. They’re wanting to help in the community, they’re asking for ways that they can serve the community.” 

As rural communities continue to innovate in health care, discovering new ways to better serve their patient populations, they also face threats from cuts to broadband, health care, and education funding. 

Advertisement

Philips said that without sustained investment, rural communities may struggle to maintain the trajectory of growing telehealth programs and broadband access, putting patients’ health and the progress made in digital care at risk.

“A lot of these opportunities to adopt and adapt technology were funded by federal resources that are now heavily constrained,” Philips. “As a country, we have to decide whether we value rural people enough to supply them with the health care and other kinds of essentials, including digital literacy, that will allow us to keep them healthy.”

Disclosure: Texas A&M University and Texas Tech University have been financial supporters of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune’s journalism. Find a complete list of them here.


This article was written with the support of a journalism fellowship from The Gerontological Society of America, The Journalists Network on Generations, and The Commonwealth Fund.

This article first appeared on The Daily Yonder and is republished here under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Texas

Texas Rangers to host Cincinnati Reds in home opener at Globe Life Field on Friday, April 3 at 3:05 p.m.

Published

on

Texas Rangers to host Cincinnati Reds in home opener at Globe Life Field on Friday, April 3 at 3:05 p.m.


– Friday, April 3: Home opener and ceremonial first pitch by Dallas Stars goaltender Jake Oettinger
– Saturday, April 4: Dot Race Results bobblehead giveaway and Leon Bridges Theme Night
– Four of the club’s first six home games to feature promotional item giveaways



Source link

Continue Reading

Texas

Our new Texas Public Schools Explorer will better serve parents

Published

on

Our new Texas Public Schools Explorer will better serve parents

Audio recording is automated for accessibility. Humans wrote and edited the story. See our AI policy, and give us feedback.

The Texas Tribune redesigned its Public Schools Explorer to add more timely data and features to help families and teachers navigate the state’s sprawling public school system.

In all, Texas has 1,202 school districts and 9,113 public schools, including hundreds of charter schools and alternative campuses. About 5.5 million students attend public schools in Texas, and our explorer includes information on all of them.

It’s an overwhelming amount of data, which is why our journalists focused on organizing the site in a more intuitive way. We included more context to explain what the numbers mean and why they matter. In addition, each school’s performance is compared against statewide and regional trends, which will help families better understand how their child’s school is performing.

Advertisement

We feel this is the perfect time to launch a new site. Parents and families need to be able to see the options available for their children’s education, especially as school choice expands in Texas. We’re showing readers their local campus and nearby campuses, including traditional school districts and charter schools. We show how their school demographics, funding and other characteristics have changed over time to help illustrate broader trends.

We also hope this tool will be useful to teachers, school staff, policymakers and anyone curious about Texas education — including those who need accurate and reliable data to understand how policy impacts students.

Each school district and campus has its own page on the site. Within those pages, data is now organized into a handful categories, including student demographics, classroom experience, opportunities and outcomes, and more. Each category has its own URL, making it easier to share information that matters the most.

We’ve added new data from the Texas Education Agency, including funding information for school districts to help readers better understand where and how schools get money. We also redesigned the districts page to make it easier to find districts using different filters.

In addition to these new features, our site will be more up to date than ever before. Previously, the explorer was updated once a year. Now we can integrate new data as soon as the state releases it, with finance numbers expected in the spring and state accountability ratings in August.

Advertisement

This new explorer builds on the Data Visuals team’s ongoing work covering public education issues affecting students and teachers across the state. In a recent story, we showed how low-income students are being left behind in higher education outcomes and included a lookup tool to help readers explore the data in their own communities.

If you have feedback, email us at schools-feedback@texastribune.org. Also, stay tuned for more updates — we plan to release new features soon. After exploring the new tool, be sure to check out the Tribune’s extensive public education coverage for more on how these issues are playing out across the state.

This project is supported in part by Greater Texas Foundation and Houston Endowment.



Source link
Continue Reading

Trending