The recent wave of tornadoes and other severe weather that tore through North Texas damaged or destroyed homes in multiple communities.
For residents who were impacted, or those who might find themselves in a similar situation in the future, the federal and state governments, as well as other organizations, can help.
Here are some resources to start looking for assistance.
Advertisement
Federal disaster assistance
The Federal Emergency Management Agency, or FEMA, can help provide immediate assistance to find shelter by texting the word SHELTER and the ZIP code to 43362. The agency also offers financial aid for temporary hotel stays for two weeks following a disaster.
FEMA also runs the Individuals and Households Program (IHP), that provides longer-term assistance and services to “eligible individuals and households affected by a disaster, who have uninsured or underinsured expenses and serious needs.”
People impacted by disasters should take photos of the damage, make a list of items that were lost or damaged and file an insurance claim as soon as possible, FEMA says on its website. The request for FEMA assistance can be made before an insurance claim, but FEMA requires proof of an insurance settlement or denial before the request can be considered. FEMA will not cover items what were covered by insurance.
FEMA aid applicants must prove their identity, citizenship status and ownership or occupancy of the damaged home. FEMA may then inspect the home before making a decision on the claim.
Impacted residents can apply online at DisasterAssistance.gov, on FEMA’s mobile app, by phone at 800-621-3362, or in person at a FEMA Disaster Recovery Center.
Advertisement
Texas disaster assistance
Texans can get immediate help from the state by calling 211 or visiting 211Texas.org. The 211 service helps connect people with state agencies and non-governmental organizations to fit their needs.
The American Red Cross currently has disaster relief centers open in both Springtown and Mineral Wells where people can go for food, medicine and emergency supplies. The Red Cross also has caseworkers to help residents with disaster recovery planning, financial assistance and insurance claims.
Landen Williams-Callis hasn’t been discussed a ton in the last month or two. Real information as it relates to Texas’ chances has been a bit tougher to come by on the elite running back from Richmond Randle. Today, Inside Texas was able to confirm that he’ll take an official visit to Texas next weekend. We’ve long known Texas wanted LW-C, but we haven’t had a good gauge on his interest in Texas.
The New World screwworm outbreak in Texas has reached five confirmed cases, prompting state agencies to establish infested zones aimed at containing the parasite’s spread.
Federal help is now involved as officials respond to the threat posed by the parasite, whose fly larvae burrow into the living flesh of warm-blooded animals, causing severe tissue damage and potential death.
“We know this development is a serious threat,” U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins said. “We’ve increased the trapping for flies along the border and ramping up surveillance.”
The Texas Animal Health Commission has established four 12.5-mile infested zones where officials believe the parasite is located and reproducing. The closest zone to Austin is Zone 3, which includes Gillespie, Kerr, and Kimble counties.
Advertisement
Zone 3 was created after New World screwworm was found in a goat in Harper, Texas, on Monday. Rollins also said, “Over the past week and a half, USDA has confirmed 6 cases of the new world screw worm within the US, all but 1 in the South, uh, South of Texas.”
ALSO| New World Screwworm case confirmed in Texas, bringing total of cases in the U.S. to six
State officials say the zones are used to prevent the spread of the parasite and restrict the movement of livestock and other warm-blooded animals through the area.
In Fredericksburg, some residents said the infested zone is a necessary step. Joan Smith, who lives in Fredericksburg, said, “It’s a good thing to protect people. It needs to be done.”
Smith said pet owners should take precautions and consult their veterinarians.
Advertisement
“Many of our neighbors, we called our local veterinarians. They told us as long as we were using certain medications, your pet is covered,” she said. “Definitely talk to your local veterinarians because they can update you.”
Some businesses in the area said the county’s infested-zone label is not expected to impact tourism this summer.
AUSTIN (KXAN) — Hundreds of Texas landowners gathered in Austin this week to challenge proposed transmission line routes tied to a major statewide power infrastructure project.
Advertisement
The Bell County East to Big Hill 765-kV transmission project, proposed by Oncor and the Lower Colorado River Authority, is designed to move power across Texas and strengthen the state grid as demand rises from population growth, data centers and industrial expansion.
Landowners, attorneys and utility representatives attend a hearing on the proposed Bell County East-to-Big Hill transmission project at the J.J. Pickle Research Campus in Austin. The hearing centers on dozens of proposed transmission line routes stretching across Central Texas. (KXAN Photo/Eric Henrikson)
In March, the utilities filed plans with the Public Utility Commission of Texas that included 122 potential route options.
This week, administrative judges are hearing testimony about those routes before eventually making recommendations to the PUC.
For Burnet County resident Jan Rose, the possibility of a transmission line crossing her property is overwhelming.
“It’s going to traverse our property, not along the property lines, but right through the middle, about 150 feet from our front door,” Rose said.
Advertisement
What is the Bell County East-to-Big Hill project?
Rose is one of hundreds of Texans participating in this week’s hearing, arguing why their land is not an appropriate location for future transmission infrastructure.
“We have 13 minutes to present this whole case (to the administrative judges),” Rose said.
The proposed project spans multiple counties across Texas and is part of a broader effort to expand the state’s electric transmission capacity.
Maps showing proposed transmission line route alternatives are displayed during a hearing on the Bell County East-to-Big Hill transmission project at the J.J. Pickle Research Campus in Austin. (KXAN Photo/Eric Henrikson)
Oncor and LCRA argue they studied dozens of route options to reduce impacts to homes, landowners and environmentally sensitive areas.
Why Texas landowners oppose the transmission routes
Still, opponents argue the process pits neighbors against one another while forcing landowners to spend significant money trying to protect their property.
“All of these groups and all of these landowners are going to spend, I mean, collectively, millions of dollars easily, over this next week in legal fees,” said Mia Sarot, founder of the Hill Country Land and Legacy Alliance, an advocacy group representing landowners across Central Texas.
Advertisement
She also argued the state’s timeline for approving transmission projects compresses the process too aggressively.
How the PUC hearing process works
Under state law, the Public Utility Commission has 180 days from the initial filing to complete the transmission line approval process.
According to Sarot, landowners have about 30 days to intervene in the case, followed by roughly 90 days of review by administrative law judges and about 30 days for PUC commissioners to make final decisions.
“The decisions are made faster than they can really meaningfully have input because you have to understand the project,” Sarot said.
When Texas regulators could make a decision
Following the hearing, administrative judges are expected to send route recommendations to the PUC.
Advertisement
“It doesn’t mean that the PUC commissioners have to agree with what they do, and they can make a completely different decision,” Sarot said.
Another hearing later this month could further complicate the process. That proceeding will focus on whether additional route alternatives should have been included in the application.
If judges determine the proposed routes were insufficient, portions of the process could be revisited.
“We might then, you know, have to do this again, spend more money. That is very frustrating,” Sarot said.
For Jan Rose and her husband, Austin Rose, the hope is simple. “Our hope is that the PUC will slow this process down,” she said.
Advertisement
As part of the hearing process, Oncor and LCRA are expected to present witnesses discussing why specific routes were selected. Participants are given 13 minutes to cross-examine utility representatives and limited time to present their arguments.
The Public Utility Commission is expected to make a final decision later this year.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
`;
}
// –>
Trending Stories
Advertisement
View All BestReviews Picks
Don’t Miss
Advertisement
Latest weather conditions from the KXAN First Warning Weather team