Connect with us

Texas

Casino advocates target Texas

Published

on

Casino advocates target Texas


Knowledge: Texas Ethics Fee; Chart: Alice Feng/Axios

Las Vegas Sands Corp., a on line casino and resort developer, has extra lobbyists in Texas than some other firm — and Sands’ roster consists of among the largest energy gamers on the state Capitol.

Why it issues: Authorized casinos may very well be a boon to the Texas financial system, that means tens of hundreds of latest jobs, together with all of the potential ills that include mainstream playing.

The large image: With round 30 million residents and few playing choices allowed below the state structure, Texas has lengthy been a goal of the playing trade.

Advertisement
  • This 12 months’s push to legalize casinos is a continuation of the well-funded effort initiated by late on line casino magnate — and outstanding Republican donor — Sheldon Adelson.

State of play: State Sen. Carol Alvarado, a Democrat from Houston, has filed laws that might legalize sports activities betting and permit on line casino resorts within the largest cities within the state — although lobbyists for the sports activities betting trade and on line casino gaming have separate laws within the works.

Actuality verify: Legalizing casinos would require an modification to the Texas Structure, which requires approval by two-thirds of the Home and Senate, after which approval by the vast majority of Texas voters.

  • Present Texas regulation permits for a lottery, bingo parlors, parimutuel betting on horse and canine racing, and playing at three tribal-owned casinos.

By the numbers: In whole, Sands is paying as a lot as $6.55 million to lobbyists this 12 months to persuade lawmakers into easing state playing restrictions, per state lobbying information reviewed by Axios.

  • The very best-paid lobbyist, Gavin Massingill, who served as chief of workers to former Texas Home Speaker Dennis Bonnen, may very well be paid as a lot as $279,450, per state information.

Zoom in: The listing of lobbyists working for Sands is a bipartisan assassin’s row of well-connected Texas energy brokers.

  • Patricia Shipton was among the many senior workers in former Home Speaker Joe Straus’ workplace.
  • Carrie Simmons was director of the Texas Home Republican Caucus.
  • Michael Toomey is a capitol veteran who labored carefully with Gov. Greg Abbott and former Gov. Rick Perry.
  • Leticia Van de Putte is a former Democratic state senator and was as soon as a candidate for lieutenant governor.

What they’re saying: “We’ll proceed to actively interact state and native leaders over the course of this session and stay dedicated to working with lawmakers to finally enable voters to determine on this problem,” Matt Hirsch, a spokesperson for the Texas Sands PAC, tells Axios.

The opposite aspect: Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, who has opposed playing in Texas, instructed KXAN final month, “I do not see any motion on it.”

Between the strains: The unprecedented $32.7 billion surplus on this 12 months’s state funds may make the financial arguments for legalized playing a more durable promote.



Source link

Advertisement

Texas

Texas Longhorns Star Ends Hailey Van Lith’s Career in Shut-Down Fashion

Published

on

Texas Longhorns Star Ends Hailey Van Lith’s Career in Shut-Down Fashion


Rori Harmon wants to be known for her defense. The senior point guard for the No. 1 Texas Longhorns prides herself on her ability to lock down some of the best point guards in the sport night in and night out. And in Texas’ Elite Eight win over TCU, she locked down Hailey Van Lith, one of the nation’s most electric scorers.

Two years after Van Lith ended Harmon and Texas’s season in the second round, Harmon got her revenge. In the Elite Eight, Harmon locked down Van Lith, limiting her to just 3-15 from the field and forcing her into seven turnovers. Before the Elite Eight matchup, Harmon shared her excitement to guard a player like Van Lith, and while she talked a big game, she backed it up with her play.

Hailey Van Lith

Mar 31, 2025; Birmingham, AL, USA; TCU Horned Frogs guard Hailey Van Lith (10) works against Texas Longhorns guard Rori Harmon (3) during the second half of an Elite 8 NCAA Tournament basketball game at Legacy Arena. Mandatory Credit: Vasha Hunt-Imagn Images / Vasha Hunt-Imagn Images

“I don’t really have to prove much, I’ve been doing this for a while, ever since I was a freshman, or even before college, I’ve been playing defense the way I do, I’m just more fundamentally sound at it now,” Harmon said. “I’m excited for that matchup, I’m excited for the competition, I’m always gonna take on whoever their best player is, I love that, I take that with responsibility. Like what my teammates and my coaches say, how I come out and attack and punch on defense, that’s basically how the team is going to play.”

Harmon set the tone early on defense for the Longhorns and Texas would go on to force 21 turnovers and allow just 12 made field goals.

Advertisement

While Harmon is not one of the four finalists for Naismith Defensive Player of the Year, she’s going to keep locking down the teams she comes across.

“I would say team defense always is the number one thing, trying to limit her touches as much as possible,” Harmon said after beating TCU. “She’s a three level scorer and a great basketball player, and she played very, really well for them, but yeah, just kind of standing firm, I think, with a good basketball player and ball hander like she is, like me personally, I can’t, like gamble and on dribbles and heads these like I have, to just stay disciplined stay in front, cut her off and stuff like that. Just get her to like go the ball because a lot of her off a lot of their offense runs through her, and she makes great play so just kind of getting the ball out of her hands is definitely is one of the keys.”

Harmon and the Longhorns will take the court next for their fourth game against South Carolina, this time in the Final Four.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Texas

The numbers show a child welfare revolution in Texas

Published

on

The numbers show a child welfare revolution in Texas


In 2015, U.S. District Judge Janis Graham Jack declared that the conditions for children in the Texas foster care system were so bad that it represented a violation of the children’s constitutional rights. Texas children, she wrote, had been “shuttled throughout a system where rape, abuse, psychotropic medication, and instability are the norm,” and where children “often age out of care more damaged than when they entered.”

Ten years later, dramatic changes have shaken the child welfare system in Texas. Much work remains, but the outcomes are nothing short of shocking. Texas now removes fewer children, keeps more children out of foster care, and protects more children from abuse and neglect than ever before. Accomplishing all three of these goals at the same time is something few people thought was possible.

Many Texans may not realize how quickly a child can be removed from their home if Child Protective Services believes there is an immediate risk. Even today, after years of reforms, a court has the authority to take a parent’s child even when the parent, CPS, and the judge all agree that the parent is most likely innocent of abuse and neglect.

Nationally, 1 out of every 3 children will experience a CPS investigation by age 18, according to a study published by the American Journal on Public Health. For Black and Native American children, it’s more than 1 out of every 2.

Advertisement

Opinion

Get smart opinions on the topics North Texans care about.

Once a child is removed, he or she will stay in foster care for an average of 14 months. In Texas, only a third of them will ever return home. Reform advocates often point out that a stranger who is accused of abusing a child is entitled to a litany of due process protections in a criminal trial that a parent is never afforded in a civil trial — even when the parent is accused of the same conduct. Yet, it is the parents who face the prospect of losing their child completely.

Termination of parental rights is often referred to as the “death penalty” of civil law. It’s not hard to see why. Most parents would sooner go to jail than lose their children.

In 2018, Texas removed 20,685 children from their homes. That same year, 211 children died from abuse and neglect in Texas. But since that time, the system has been shocked by a barrage of reforms. In 2024, Texas removed 9,220 children — a 55% drop in just six years. Furthermore, 99 children died from abuse and neglect in 2024 — a 53% drop.

Advertisement

Also in 2018, a new set of CPS reforms began taking effect, reforms that would set the tone for nearly eight years of earthshaking changes to the child welfare system in Texas.

State Reps. Gene Wu, D-Houston, James Frank, R-Wichita Falls, and Dustin Burrows, R-Lubbock, who is now the speaker of the Texas House, worked together in 2017 to craft and pass HB 7 with the help of Sen. Bryan Hughes. The bill included a long list of due process reforms to Texas CPS law. Among other reforms, the bill prohibited child removals based on a family being low-income, required CPS to end its practice of suing parents in multiple courts at the same time (one court for each child), and prohibited CPS from terminating the rights of both parents when they only had evidence against one. The bill passed the Legislature with near unanimous support. Due process in CPS cases had gotten the Legislature’s attention.

In the years following, due process reforms in Texas sped up. In 2020, the Texas Supreme Court ended a practice whereby a jury could terminate parental rights even when jurors could not agree on what the parent had done wrong — a rule change specifically set in motion by HB 7.

In 2021, HB 567 dramatically reformed the definition of child neglect. In 2023, HB 730 required CPS caseworkers to inform parents of their rights before questioning them, like police officers do with criminal suspects. Both bills included numerous other reforms as well, and they were accompanied by a slew of other bills each making additional “pro-family” reforms to the system — reforms ranging from narrowly targeted due process changes to broad new standards of training for CPS caseworkers. Almost all of the bills passed with broad bipartisan support.

In 2021, Rep. Wu put clear words to the problem when describing how HB 567 changed the definition of neglect to prohibit the removal of a child unless there was an immediate danger. “We’ve always looked at what we’re doing for kids, but we don’t consider often what we’re doing to kids. … We guarantee you, if you strip them from their family, they will be traumatized. The question that we’ve never asked is this: Is it worth it?”

Advertisement

Because fewer children are being removed from their homes, the total number of children sitting in foster care has also plummeted, according to Texas Department of Family and Protective Services data. Altogether, the shift in the system since the 2018 reforms began has been dramatic:

  • Children removed by CPS each year: down 55%
  • Child deaths from abuse and neglect: down 53%
  • Number of children sitting in foster care: down 47%
  • Number of children waiting for adoption: down 43%
  • Six-month and one-year recidivism rates: both at the lowest levels ever recorded (five-year rates have been essentially flat since 2015).

The Texas Legislature is now well into the 2025 legislative session. More reforms to the system are already being proposed. There are many holes left to be filled. In his State of the Judiciary speech before the Texas House and Senate, Supreme Court Chief Justice Jimmy Blacklock spoke for several minutes about the critical importance of ensuring due process for families in the CPS system. At the state’s highest court, due process for families is now a point of critical focus.

Doubtless, not all of the positive changes in the system are attributable to the due process reforms of the last seven years, but many of them clearly are.

One thing is apparent: Texas is embracing the theory of due process in the child welfare system, and seven years in, outcomes for families and children have dramatically improved.

Jeremy Newman is vice president of Family Freedom Project.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Texas

Truth Social owner Trump Media becomes first company listed on NYSE Texas — handing early win to exchange

Published

on

Truth Social owner Trump Media becomes first company listed on NYSE Texas — handing early win to exchange


Trump Media & Technology Group said on Monday it has become the first company to be listed on NYSE Texas, handing an early boost to the exchange as it gears up for fierce competition in the Lone Star state.

The company, which operates Truth Social and is primarily owned by President Trump, said it will also list its warrants on the Texas exchange. Its primary listing, however, will remain on the Nasdaq.

The move could bolster Intercontinental Exchange-owned NYSE, which on Monday became the first exchange to operate in Texas.

Trump Media is the parent company of social-media platform Truth Social. NurPhoto via Getty Images

The state is home to the largest number of companies listed on the New York Stock Exchange, with a combined market value of over $3.7 trillion, and is now seeing rising competition for market dominance among stock exchanges.

Advertisement

NYSE will have to contend with rival Nasdaq, which promised to open a regional headquarters in the state earlier this month, and the Texas Stock Exchange, a venture backed by heavyweights including BlackRock and Citadel Securities.

The Texas Stock Exchange submitted paperwork in January to operate as a national securities exchange, and is eyeing a launch in 2026.

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott announces the Texas Stock Exchange leaders at the Governor’s Mansion in Austin in September. ZUMAPRESS.com

“This listing, alongside our plans to reincorporate in Florida, shows we’re part of a growing movement to take our business to states that value free enterprise and personal freedom,” said Trump Media CEO Devin Nunes.

Trump Media is a popular stock on retail trading forums and has often seen wild bouts of volatility in the past, such as around the election in November.

Securing the listing is a major win for the NYSE, but some consider the move “symbolic” – a perception that the exchange will likely need to change, while also strengthening liquidity.

Advertisement
President Trump is Trump Media’s majority shareholder. Getty Images

Still, the growing competition between listing venues could strengthen the state’s emergence as a financial hub and a challenger to New York.

“The Texas business-friendly environment — lack of all the political issues and a stronger focus on what business should be — has a really unique position,” said Derek Wilson, co-founder of Dallas Opportunity Partners, an investor in the Texas Stock Exchange.

The announcement came on the heels of a filing late on Friday that BlackRock’s iShares division has filed for SEC approval to launch a Texas-focused exchange traded fund. The asset management giant did not disclose the exchange on which it proposes to list the ETF.

The fund will invest in stocks of companies headquartered in Texas that make up the Russell Texas Equity Index, a subset of the Russell 3000 index Unless regulators block or delay the offering, it could begin trading by early June.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending