Connect with us

Tennessee

Tennessee officers accused of shielding a man committing sex crimes. Police deny extortion

Published

on

Tennessee officers accused of shielding a man committing sex crimes. Police deny extortion


NASHVILLE, Tenn. (AP) — A federal lawsuit claims police officers took thousands of dollars from a businessman in their Tennessee city in exchange for obstructing efforts to investigate allegations that he was sexually assaulting multiple women for years. The police department has denied any wrongdoing.

The extortion claim involving several Johnson City Police officers appears in court filings from a federal lawsuit accusing building contractor Sean Williams — who is now in custody on state and federal criminal charges — of drugging and raping women in the East Tennessee community from 2018 to 2021 while police did little to investigate him.

There was “either an implied or explicit agreement” that the officers would shield Williams, “permitting him to continue his criminal activities of abuse and trafficking with impunity,” say lawyers for nine women, listed as Jane Does 1-9, who are suing the city.

These plaintiffs raised the extortion claims months ago, but their May 14 filing makes the claims more explicit by alleging that banking documents back the assertions. The same lawyers also revealed, in April, that they have provided hundreds of pages of information for a federal public corruption investigation of the police department.

Advertisement

Williams awaits trial on state charges including child rape, aggravated sexual battery and especially aggravated sexual exploitation, and federal charges including three counts of production of child sexual abuse material and one count of distribution of cocaine. He’s also charged with escape, after authorities said he kicked the window out of a federal transport van and was caught in Florida more than a month later.

The law firm representing Williams did not immediately respond to a request for comment emailed by The Associated Press.

Erick Herrin, an attorney for the city and multiple officers who were sued, said all the defendants deny the allegations, but court rules limit what else he can say. In a statement, the city said it would welcome an investigation.

“There has been no evidence presented to support allegations of corruption by the Johnson City Police Department, and we welcome any investigation that could dispel such claims,” the city said.

The May 14 filing claims Williams’ business partner, referred to as Female 4, opened shell companies disguised as subcontractors and transferred thousands of dollars from Williams’ business, Glass and Concrete Contracting LLC. The money was laundered so she could take “owner draws” to pay $2,000 a week to some Johnson City Police officers, who had also seized cash from Williams’ safe, the document alleges.

Advertisement

The plaintiffs point to bank records, saying that for instance, during a two-week period in June 2022, Female 4 withdrew nearly $30,000 in cash from the company’s account. They say the woman appears to have withdrawn no more than $10,000 per day, “likely in an effort to evade mandatory suspicious activity.”

In a filing in March, the plaintiffs said Williams himself described the extortion in a message from jail in September 2023. They say he used a contraband cellphone to send the messages to a coconspirator who then posted them on Facebook. One mentioned weekly payments of $2,000 to officers using fraudulent 1099 tax documents and “forged owner draws.”

In a court filing in response, Female 4’s attorney said her communications with Williams have been infrequent since their personal relationship ended in 2017. The filing says the Facebook post was made by “someone using the name of Sean Williams” and says she has no relevant knowledge about the allegations and doesn’t have any relevant documents.

The attorney for Female 4 did not immediately respond to an emailed request for comment.

The local district attorney, who is prosecuting Tennessee’s charges against Williams, declined to comment on the extortion accusations, citing an ongoing investigation, and didn’t specify whether or not they’re looking into extortion claims.

Advertisement

The lawsuits say Williams’ crimes continued even after Jane Doe 1 survived a fall from the window of his fifth story apartment in September 2020. Officers investigating the fall found ample evidence of sexual assaults in his apartment, including a list of names labeled “Raped.” Even when that woman went public, Williams’ identity was protected as “Robert Voe.”

Kateri Lynne Dahl, a former special prosecutor in the East Tennessee U.S. attorney’s office, was brought in as a liaison with city authorities. She also filed a federal lawsuit against the city. She says she gathered substantial evidence that Williams had been dealing drugs and was credibly accused of sexually assaulting and raping multiple women, but the police refused to investigate further, and botched her effort to arrest him on an April 2021 federal felon-possessing-ammunition charge, letting him flee.

The city rebutted Dahl’s claims in a statement that pointed to prosecutorial delays.

Williams wasn’t arrested until April 2023, when a campus police officer in North Carolina found him asleep in his car and learned of the federal warrant. An affidavit says a search of the car found — along with drugs and about $100,000 in cash — digital storage devices with more than 5,000 images of child sexual abuse as well as photos and videos of 52 female victims being sexually assaulted by Williams at his Johnson City apartment while they were in an “obvious state of unconsciousness.”

Many of the videos were stored in labeled folders, and at least a half-dozen names on the folders were consistent with first names on the “Raped” list found in his apartment two and a half years earlier, the affidavit states.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, public outcry over the police response to complaints from a growing number of women prompted the city in the summer of 2022 to order an outside investigation into how officers handled sexual assault investigations. And in November 2022, the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation opened a federal sex trafficking investigation.

Findings from the city’s third-party audit, released in 2023, include that police conducted inconsistent, ineffective and incomplete investigations; relied on inadequate record management; had insufficient training and policies, and sometimes showed issues with gender-based stereotypes and bias.

The city said it began improving the department’s performance while awaiting the audit’s findings, including following the district attorney’s new sexual assault investigation protocol; reviewing investigative policies and procedures; creating a “comfortable space” for victim interviews and increasing funding for officer training and a new records management system.





Source link

Advertisement

Tennessee

Gov. Lee on ‘America 250’ tour of Tennessee’s 95 counties

Published

on

Gov. Lee on ‘America 250’ tour of Tennessee’s 95 counties


Enter your email and we’ll send a secure one-click link to sign in.

WKRN is provided by Nexstar Media Group, Inc., and uses the My Nexstar sign-in, which works across our media network.

Learn more at nexstar.tv/privacy-policy.

Advertisement

WKRN is provided by Nexstar Media Group, Inc., and uses the My Nexstar sign-in, which works across our media network.

Nexstar Media Group, Inc. is a leading, diversified media company that produces and distributes engaging local and national news, sports, and entertainment content across its television and digital platforms. The My Nexstar sign-in works across the Nexstar network—including The CW, NewsNation, The Hill, and more. Learn more at nexstar.tv/privacy-policy.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tennessee

Meet the TSWA 2026 Tennessee high school all-state girls basketball teams

Published

on

Meet the TSWA 2026 Tennessee high school all-state girls basketball teams


The Tennessee high school girls basketball season produced a number of big stars. 

Here are the 2026 Tennessee Sports Writers Association all-state girls basketball teams in the six TSSAA classifications.

Class 1A 

Laila Downs-Darden, McEwen, Jr.; Rayanna Fisher, Greenfield, Jr.; Zoey Nicholas, Pickett County, Sr.*; Ava Ashley, Wayne County, Jr.; Bailey Blair, Richland, Sr.;  Harmony Bell, Middleton, Sr.; Kemora Buggs, Middleton, Sr.;  Lily Claire Lowe, Coalfield, So.;  Kendall McLemore, Humboldt, Jr.; Abigail Netherton, Van Buren, Jr.;  Ella Porter, Greenfield, Fr.; Michelle Shields, Unaka, Sr.; Jaycee Stafford, McKenzie, So.; Tralyn Southerland, North Greene, So.;  Lily Wright, Coalfield, So.

Advertisement

Class 2A 

Wylie Kee, Huntingdon, Fr.; Maliyah Glasper, Gatlinburg-Pittman, Sr.; Kaegan Young, Cascade, Sr.; Ally Augustin, Loretto, Jr.;  Knox Bennett, Huntingdon, So.;  Ashlee Brent, Westview, Jr.;  Emma Cooper, York Institute, Jr.;  Kaylee Dixon, Smith County, So.;  Ava Floyd, Hickman County, Jr.;  Emry Jones, Smith County, Jr.;  Malea Masingale, McMinn Central, Jr.;  Sh’Nyla Moss, Union City, Jr.;  Saniya Reaves, Gibson County, Sr.; Curnesha Taylor, Memphis Business, Sr.; Raylee Werner, York Institute, Sr.

Class 3A 

Andrea Flores, Daniel Boone, Sr.; Chelby Jordan, Dyersburg, Sr.; Sydney Wilhite, Cumberland County, Jr.; McLayne Bobo, Tullahoma, Sr.; Ta’Krya Boddie, Covington, Jr.; Karmine Carmichael, Cocke County, Jr.; Gwen Carroll, Alcoa, Sr.; Gracie Clark, White County, Sr.; Lexi Clark, Stone Memorial, Fr.; Journey Holloway, Red Bank, Sr.; Jade Reed, South Gibson, Jr.; Harper Stinnett, Alcoa, Fr.; Aaliyah Story, Daniel Boone, Sr.; Brylee Tullock, Greeneville, Sr.; Kaylor West, Liberty Creek, Sr. 

Advertisement

Class 4A 

Cecilie Brandimore, Franklin, Sr; Kimora Fields, Bradley Central, Sr.; Natayla Hodge, Bearden, Sr.; Kaliyah Burden, Sevier County, Jr.; Cara Lee Gilbert, Cookeville, Sr.; Allie Gillies, Cookeville, Sr.; Hannah Hall, Morristown East, Sr.; Layla Hall, Blackman, So.; Aleigha Taylor, Ooltewah, So.; Carter Jones, West Ridge, Jr.; Samiya Jones, Bartlett, Sr.; Nyla Johnson, Nolensville, Jr.; Fran Kelly, Collierville, Sr.; KJ McNealy, Farragut, Sr.;  KT Tolbert, Green Hill, So.

Division II-A 

Haylen Ayers, University School of Jackson, Jr.; Kayte Madison Bjornstad, Providence Christian Academy, Sr.; Jules Ferrell, Middle Tennessee Christian, Jr.; Makynli Bacon, Webb School-Bell Buckle, So.;  Maddie Braden, Christian Academy of Knoxville, Jr.;  Lexi Hammock, Christian Academy of Knoxville, Jr.;  Mimi Lee, Notre Dame, So.;  Kinsley Owen, Silverdale Baptist, Jr.;  Brilee Price, Ezell-Harding, Sr.;  Lilly Teague, University School of Jackson, Jr.; Skylar Walden, The King’s Academy, Jr.;  Ava Zenner, Franklin Road Academy, So. 

Division II-AA

Meeyah Green, Knox Webb, Sr.; Ava Jarrett, Lipscomb Academy, Sr.; Ava Jones, Hutchison School, Sr.; Jane Ellis, Christ Presbyterian Academy, Jr.;  Maddie Graham, Father Ryan, Sr.;  Emery Haws, Knox Catholic, Fr.; Kendall Jones, Briarcrest Christian, Sr.; Blake Maple, Lipscomb Academy, Jr.;  Kyndall Mays, Knox Webb, So.;  Aubrey Bush, Baylor School, 8th grade; Jayda Robinson, Christ Presbyterian Academy, Jr.; Alana Wells, Ensworth School, Sr.

Advertisement

Tyler Palmateer covers high school sports for The Tennessean. Have a story idea for Tyler? Reach him at tpalmateer@tennessean.com and on the X platform, @tpalmateer83.

He also contributes to The Tennessean’s high school  sports newsletter, The Bootleg. Subscribe to The Bootleg here.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tennessee

TN Court of Appeals says National Guard can remain deployed in Memphis

Published

on

TN Court of Appeals says National Guard can remain deployed in Memphis


play

The Tennessee Court of Appeals will allow the National Guard to remain in Memphis after a recent court opinion.

In an opinion issued April 28, three Tennessee Court of Appeals judges ruled that the National Guard deployment by Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee in October 2025 can stay because the plaintiffs do not have standing to block the deployment.

Advertisement

The appellate ruling sends the case back to Davidson County Chancery Court for continued litigation, and found the group of Democratic lawmakers bringing the case did not have standing to sue.

According to the written opinion, judges cite a lack of standing from the plaintiffs to bring the lawsuit.

Plaintiffs Memphis City Councilman JB Smiley, Jr., Shelby County Commissioners Erika Sugarmon and Henri Brooks, Shelby County Mayor Lee Harris, State Reps. GA Hardaway and Gabby Salinas, and State Sen. Jeff Yarbro sued to block the deployment on Oct. 17.

Yarbro is from Nashville and is the only non-Shelby County official listed as a plaintiff.

Advertisement

“Our conclusion is not that no one has standing. It is, instead, that these individuals lack standing,” the opinion said.

The opinion reverses Davidson County Chancellor Patricia Head Moskal injunction, which temporarily ordered the National Guard be withdrawn from Memphis, issued on Nov. 17, 2025.

On March 5, a panel of three judges from the Tennessee Court of Appeals heard arguments about the constitutionality of Lee’s deployment of the National Guard to Memphis.

The Tennessee Attorney General’s office filed the appeal weeks after Moskal granted a temporary injunction against the National Guard deployment. If that injunction were to go into effect, the guard would be withdrawn from Memphis pending the final ruling in the case.

Advertisement

Three questions were brought by the state to the appeal: whether plaintiffs invoked an available waiver of the government’s immunity (known as sovereign immunity) from being sued, if they have standing and if Lee violated state law in deploying the National Guard to Memphis.

Lack of standing from plaintiffs

The opinion did not rule whether Lee’s deployment of the National Guard to Memphis was legal, but instead held that the individuals who brought the lawsuit do not have proper standing to do so.

Tennessee Court of Appeals Judge Andy D. Bennett wrote the opinion of the Court, which Judges Frank Clement Jr. and Jeffrey Usman signed on to. In their opinion, they state that the opinion of the court is not that no one has standing to bring the lawsuit, just that the legislators who did so lack standing.

In essence, the appellate ruling focused on the barrier to entry for suing and not the constitutionality of deploying the National Guard to Memphis.

Advertisement

According to the court, individual state legislators cannot bring an action against the government unless authorized by the Tennessee General Assembly. It also found that Lee’s decision to deploy the National Guard, stripping them of their right to vote on the issue, counted as “diffuse injuries to legislative bodies, not personal injuries of the individual legislators.”

“To the extent that there is a cognizable injury, any injury in not voting upon or debating the deployment of the Tennessee National Guard is shared equally by the other members of the respective legislative bodies. This is problematic for the legislative plaintiffs’ position because, as noted above, ‘individual members lack standing to assert the institutional interests of a legislature,’” the court found.

The same reasoning was applied locally to the members of the Shelby County Commission and Memphis City Council.

As to Harris’ involvement, the court found that any injuries to him or his office would instead be “purported injuries to Shelby County.”

Advertisement

“For example, he notes financial strains upon the county budget stemming from the National Guard’s presence. Mayor Harris is not the county itself, and he does not assert that the Shelby County Charter confers upon him the authority to file lawsuits on behalf of Shelby County. Absent such authority he has no ability to bring suit on behalf of Shelby County. In fact, the plaintiffs expressly indicate in their briefing on appeal that ‘Mayor Harris… is not purporting to proceed on behalf of Shelby County, but rather, is vindicating executive prerogatives that are vested exclusively in his office.’ Accordingly, while injuries to Shelby County could potentially provide a basis for asserting that the county itself has been injured, injuries to the county are not a basis for providing standing for Mayor Harris,” the court wrote.

Despite reversing Moskal’s decision on the temporary injunction, the appellate court said it is possible that someone does have standing to bring the case, just not the ones currently named as plaintiffs.

Brooke Muckerman is the education and children’s issues and politics reporter for The Commercial Appeal. She can be reached at brooke.muckerman@commercialappeal.com.

Lucas Finton covers crime, policing, jails, the courts and criminal justice policy for The Commercial Appeal. He can be reached by phone or email: (901)208-3922 and Lucas.Finton@commercialappeal.com, and followed on X @LucasFinton.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending