South-Carolina
Everything Kirby Smart said as Georgia continues to practice for South Carolina
Kirby Smart was all business when speaking to reporters on Tuesday following the second practice of the week for Georgia.
He did not mince words on how the Bulldogs have been practicing. But the Georgia coach did share some details on how things are going for the Bulldogs as they prepare for their SEC opener against South Carolina.
Below is everything Smart said following Tuesday’s practice. Georgia and South Carolina will play at 3:30 p.m. ET on Saturday.
On how practice has been this week…
“Better today than yesterday. It was good.”
On wanting to keep Spencer Rattler in the pocket versus making him scramble…
“You’ll carry a game plan to do both pretty much against every quarterback. A traditional pocket guy that nobody moves doesn’t exist anymore really. We call them statues, and teams just don’t play with those guys anymore. You wouldn’t have a lot of alternative rushes for them, but the guys that we play now days, you have to have a rush plan to do multiple things based on situation, score, down and distance, coverage. A lot of things go into how you rush the quarterback.”
On Roderick Robinson…
“He got the spring ball to learn and figure some things out. He caught up to speed, and he’s gotten an opportunity. We’ve had some injured backs, he’s been healthy. I’ve seen him mature. He’s very bright. He has good vision. He continues to improve picking up pass pro. He should be a weapon doing that because he’s big and physical, so he should be able to do that. It’s something that all freshmen go through where they have to learn that, they have to get comfortable. Picking up blitzing backers at our level is not something they do at their level. He continues to improve, and I’m proud of the work he’s done.”
On Ladd McConkey and the impact of his absence…
“We have guys that have similar skillsets, we just don’t have the experience. We have guys capable of filling the void left by Ladd, but we don’t have guys with the experience in this offense. Two years, 15 games a year, 30 games of experience is immense. That’s the part we miss. As far as his availability, he hasn’t been available. He’s been injured. He’s trying to come back, and we’re trying to figure out all we can do to speed that process up.”
On David Daniel-Sisavanh…
“Very instinctive. He’s got good speed. For two years now he’s come in in situational football. DIME he’s played. Third down he’s played. Late in games he’s played and played well. He’s had some really good hits. He had a hit against Oregon last year that was a really good hit. He had a hit against South Carolina late in the game. He’s shown up and played when we’ve asked him to. He’s played on special teams. He’s a product of the development and growth, intelligence and persistence.”
On Broderick Jones/Darnell Washington and their impact…
“I don’t know that the Broderick effect is anything relative to the Darnell effect. Obviously they’re two different players. We have two different guys, really multiple guys filling the shoes of those guys. Darnell is just different. He’s a generational player. You may not coach a long time and have someone that size that’s that physical at that position. But Broderick was, he was more pass pro. He was elite at pass pro, really good athlete. He could pull and run, get in space, do a lot of things. I feel like our tackles now can do those same things. So, it’s not as big a difference. I’m not talking in terms of ability. In the run game, there’s not as big a difference in the tackle and tight ends.
On the place-kicking competition…
“There’s competition for everything. It’s hard within a week. We get maybe 10 to 12 kicks a week. I’m talking about 11-on-11, not off on their on. We chart it. We keep up with it, we monitor it. We put weight on preseason camp. I got a lot of confidence in our kicker, I got a lot of confidence in both our kickers. Both our kickers are a weapon.”
On Javon Bullard and Austin Blaske’s statuses…
“Blaske is working his way back. He might be available. He’s one of the toughest guys I’ve been around so he’s trying to speed up that recovery and make himself available for this game.
Javon is still in non(contact) right now. He’s out there at practice, but he wasn’t able to do a lot.”
On ways to become a smarter football observer…
“Join a staff of an SEC program. I don’t understand what you’re asking. If you want to be a better football coach, go be around football coaches, right? If you want to understand football better, get in the tunnels and the dark spots and the organizations and watch it and learn it I guess. Is that what you’re asking? Football in general, I don’t think you can learn it on Twitter and I don’t think you can learn it on TV because it’s scary what people think they know.”
On if he studied coaches as he was getting started…
“No, I just worked. I respect coaches and I love to learn from them but I don’t study them. I don’t go out and say what is his win-loss record. You learn from the people you work for. I spent a long time working for some really good coaches. Bobby Bowden, coach Richt, my dad, coach Saban. You emulate those you work for and admire most.”
On what goes into electing to receive the opening kickoff after not doing so since 2019…
“The biggest thing is weather. It’s a concern of rain, so you want your possessions to be in non-inclement weather. If there’s any percentage of chance, you’ve got to make a decision based on that. I mean, wind, sun. Those are the biggest factors, which, you know, you can say they’re not a factor because we’re both going to have to play both directions, right? But it’s just a matter of which one you want to start out with, and I think trying to get momentum and field position in a game sometimes impacts the game.”
On the Tyler Simmons offsides call and how long it took him to get over that call…
“I mean, I was over it after it happened because I just assumed that, you know, they made the call that they saw and they felt confident about. But in all reality it should’ve come back anyway because they had people moving before the snap. So it wasn’t about whether he was onside or not — the movement pre-snap should’ve negated the play. It’s something we work hard on.”
On if he got what he wanted in terms of snaps for so many players in the first two games…
“Are you saying pleased with the performance or pleased with the number of snaps?”
The reporter leaves it open to Smart to decide…
“I didn’t have a pre-set notion of what it should be or shouldn’t be. I certainly would like to get more players playing time. Therefore when they do play they can lean on the experience of their game time. It concerns me that we haven’t played as many snaps with our starters. That’s the concerning thing because you’re going to catch a hot game where you’re playing 80-90 snaps. That’s what we condition all summer for, that’s what we condition in practice for, that’s what we work really hard for. The concern is on the ability to play as many snaps as it takes. Am I happy that some of those guys got to play and some of those got experience? Absolutely. They’ve worked their tail off, and they need it. And they need a lot more.”
On the biggest challenges for a secondary facing a quarterback like Spencer Rattler who can extend plays…
“Yeah, poise and performance. He’s going to hit some plays. He’s going to hit some shots. That’s what he does. He does it well. Playing the ball in the deep part of the field is one of the number one characteristics of a defensive back. If you have that flaw, it can be fatal. It tends to show up in games like this because he’s going to get opportunities. He’s going to throw the ball down the field. They have big, physical, fast wideouts. I mean, there’s a reason why they’re third or fourth in the country in passing yards because he throws the ball extremely well. He sees the field extremely well. He can throw the ball to all parts of the field, and he’s throwing it to people that can do something with it after they catch it. It’s going to be a big-time test for our secondary to play the ball in the air or tackle the man with the ball after it’s caught.”
On if he’s at the point where he can narrow down the rotation at corner…
“It’ll be based on practice week like right now. Like, we’re out there practicing right now. We’re shooting balls out of jugs, deep balls. We’re throwing the ball all over the yard. We’re getting extra throws. We’re getting extra scrambles, and we’re judging how guys play. We’re trying to simulate what may happen in the game. We’re going to play the guys that do the best job in practice, whether that’s five guys or two guys.”
On Andrew Paul as he continues to make his way back…
“Just that. He’s continuing to make his way back. He’s feeling his way through it. He has not, probably, cut loose. I think he would tell you he’s feeling his way through contact, trying to feel his way through it. He hasn’t had a lot of opportunities. He’s had a few, but with Kendall coming back, he’s been a little more limited. I think he’s a young back that’s still getting his confidence back. He’s flashed, had some really good runs in camp, and I’m hoping we get to see more of him so we get to see that.”
On defensive personnel on third and long, pressure situations, and why Jordan Hall and Warren Brinson rotate the way they do…
“I think it’s by series. So, relative to who’s playing, you may have seen one first the other, but if Warren plays a lot of snaps, then it’s Jordan, to be fresh. If it’s Jordan who’s played a lot of snaps, then it’s Warren. It’s interchangeable as far as no rhyme or reason. They’re both very capable, both very athletic.”
On Dillon Bell being selfless…
“We’ll always have that element, whether it’s he or Mews or the other guys who can line up in the backfield. That’s always going to be there. We have backs capable of doing that too when we are 100 percent healthy. So, I don’t know if I can answer that. But we’ll probably keep it there. It probably depends on what wideouts are healthy, what we have week to week and what the game plan is.
On Kamari Lassiter and his performance coming back from injury…
Really good leader. Solid, tough, physical tackler. Confident. He’s playing really well right now, playing hard. I just like the way he goes about his business. He practices like a pro, he walk throughs like a pro, he takes notes like a pro. He’s very driven and focused.”
On the home win streak and South Carolina being the last loss…
“No, I wouldn’t want to give B-Mac and Will pleasure.”
On analyst Brandon Streeter and if he’s helped this week…
“I can’t answer that good. I know he helped with the offensive staff in terms of coaching the coaches and gave input he knew about the kids, maybe the ones he recruited. I wasn’t in that meeting, but I know he did do that earlier.
On how many takes it took him to do the Regions commercial…
“I don’t remember. It was shorter than I thought it would be, but it was more difficult than I thought it would be in terms of trying to keep my composure and not laugh.”
South-Carolina
ESPN's College Football Playoff Predictor has updated again. Here's where South Carolina stands
ESPN.com’s College Football Playoff predictor isn’t perfect because it applies analytics to a situation that ultimately will be decided by a committee of humans. But it does provide a nice guide and discussion piece about which teams have the best chance to make this year’s College Football Playoff.
Because of that human element, the predictor has been updating twice each week, once on Sunday to account for Saturday’s games and again after the latest CFP rankings are released.
[More for subscribers: What latest rankings mean for South Carolina’s College Football Playoff chances]
While the Gamecocks won their game on Saturday and got a lot of help from the teams around them last week, the logjam of SEC teams ahead of them in Tuesday’s rankings is still limiting their upside at this time.
With the committee putting South Carolina behind fellow three-loss SEC teams Alabama and Ole Miss, the predictor currently gives South Carolina a 20 percent chance of making the 12-team field, which is three percentage points lower than its chances in Sunday’s update.
The Gamecocks do, of course, have one more huge opportunity to pad their resume when they travel to Clemson this weekend to renew the annual rivalry in what may be the biggest game in the matchup’s history.
Beat the Tigers, who are currently No. 12 in the CFP Top 25, and South Carolina’s chances of making the playoff jump to 46 percent, according to the predictor.
While that’s just under a coin flip, it’s also 12 percentage points lower than it was in Sunday’s update.
South Carolina is still very much in the hunt but is going to need to win and play very well against Clemson and get more help around it.
[GamecockCentral: $1 for 7 days]
As a reminder, the CFP committee’s top 12 teams won’t correlate exactly with the 12-team field.
The CFP will consist of the top five highest-ranked conference champions and the next seven highest-ranked at-large schools. The top four conference champions will receive the top four seeds and a first-round bye. The fifth conference champion will be seeded by its CFP ranking. If that ranking is outside of the top 12 it will be seeded 12th as the final team in the field.
The teams seeded 5 through 12 will fight it out in the first round with the winners advancing to the quarterfinal round to face the top four seeds.
The Gamecocks and Tigers are set for a noon showdown Saturday in Clemson.
ESPN Analytics uses FPI to simulate the entire college football season 200,000 times. A committee model is applied to mimic College Football Playoff selections and seeding in order to generate a 12-team bracket for each simulation. The most likely CFP teams are provided for user selections. After user inputs, a likely bracket is generated and randomly simulated using FPI.
South-Carolina
The Verdict: South Carolina was built for this moment
South Carolina football superfan Chris Paschal writes a weekly column during the season for GamecockCentral called “The Verdict.” Chris is a lawyer at Goings Law Firm in Columbia.
It will have been 44,592 days since Clemson students marched onto our campus with guns drawn when the Gamecocks take the field this Saturday in Death Valley. Back in 1902, Clemson students were mad because of a cartoon that depicted a Gamecock whipping a Tiger.
They marched on our campus, ready to cause bodily harm, over a cartoon. For 44,592 days, Clemson students, fans, coaches, players, and administrators have done everything but declare war on South Carolina to ensure they remain the superior football program in the state.
In 1902 there was more than just the cartoon. In 1902, Carolina beat Clemson.
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution put it best following the game: the Clemson Tiger “was so successfully tamed this morning by Carolina. Its tail was twisted and twisted by the sturdy ‘pig skin pushers’ of Carolina, and after two hours and more of hard battle it gave up further fight, for time was called and it became as tame as the proverbial lamb.”
Carolina upset Clemson who at the time was led by John Heisman and was considered one of the great southern football powers. I think that too probably had a little something to do with the hostilities and hurt feelings coming from the Clemson students.
[GamecockCentral: Subscribe for $1 for 7 days]
For the 121st time this Saturday, it will be Carolina and Clemson playing a football game against each other. And while we are past the days of armed invasions, you can’t help but think this Saturday’s showdown may be the most consequential in the series’ history.
There have certainly been big matchups in years past. I am not discounting 1987. I am not overlooking 1979. I understand 2011-2013 featured some great teams. But this coming Saturday, both Clemson and Carolina will still be alive and in contention to bring home a national title.
The chances for both are not significant, but they are legitimate. For the first time in the entirety of the rivalry’s history, both Carolina and Clemson fans can hope that with a win over their hated rival they are one step closer to a playoff berth, which means one more step closer in the quest for a national championship.
Hopefully, the players donning the garnet and black won’t think similar thoughts as they run out onto the field for what should be a cold but sunny day. This game to the players needs to be about one thing: beating a team they are better than.
In continuing the list of firsts, for the first time in roughly a decade, South Carolina will have what I consider to be the better football team when they kick the ball off against Clemson. I think we have a better defense, I think we have a better offensive line, I think we have skill position players that are just as good as Clemson’s (if not better), and I think we have the better quarterback.
But that is what I think. I am an attorney. I am a fan. Clemson players won’t just roll over because I declared we have the better team. In fact, I expect this Dabo Swinney-led Clemson football team to fight like hell in an effort to keep their thumb still firmly on top of us.
Like Clemson fans, I think Clemson football players and coaches also think it is their birthright to beat the Gamecocks. And why shouldn’t they?
Clemson has won eight out of the last nine against Carolina. They have danced on our sidelines in the fourth quarter to Sandstorm, they have talked about how they think they will dominate us; they have talked about how we aren’t the real USC nor are we the real Carolina.
Underneath this façade of respect and admiration for this year’s Carolina team, Clemson fans (and I assume players) quietly assume 2024 will be just like most other recent years. They assume the moment will be too big, they assume the ghosts of years past will be too much, and they assume that by about 3:30 in the afternoon, Carolina will have once again not been physically or mentally strong enough to defeat Clemson.
[Get our free newsletter! Don’t rely on search engines and social media for your Gamecock info.]
But I also think these assumptions, which often manifest themself in a holier-than-thou arrogance, stem from a small shred of doubt and fear that has crept into their minds. Carolina fans had no idea Clemson was passing the Gamecocks as a football program until it was too late. From 2009-2013, Carolina won five straight over Clemson. They assumed Clemson and their bumpkin coach were finally second fiddle to the Gamecocks. They ignored Clemson’s recruiting successes, they explained away Clemson’s double-digit win seasons as illegitimate due to being in the ACC, and they watched Clemson build a juggernaut that had passed Carolina in a very real and lasting way by 2014.
All it took was one whipping in 2014 for Carolina fans to realize that Clemson was now on a path that would destroy Gamecock hopes and dreams for many years to come. That feeling of “oh, crap” that Carolina fans felt in the few weeks leading up to the 2014 Clemson games, I wonder if Clemson fans are feeling that very same thing leading up to this Saturday’s game.
Maybe the thought of Carolina passing Clemson as a program hasn’t even crossed their minds. Maybe it is absurd that I would mention that in this column. Maybe by the final snap on Saturday, Clemson will have soundly defeated Carolina and made me and so many hopeful Gamecock fans look foolish.
Or maybe Harbor, Kennard, Stewart, Hemingway, Sanders, Knight, Emmanwori, Sellers, and so many other Gamecock stalwarts are capable of handling business and showing we do have the better team.
A win this weekend could be program defining. It at the very least could be season defining.
Is Shane Beamer and this Gamecock program always a bridesmaid but never the bride? Or is this team going to let this state and this nation understand that this is a new type of Gamecock football program?
We won’t know until Saturday, but I will be in Clemson cheering Carolina on, with the hope – the belief – that we will see that latter. Let’s tame the tiger once again into the proverbial lamb.
Forever to thee.
South-Carolina
Warde Manuel discusses how Clemson-South Carolina winner could see College Football Playoff resume boosted
Ranked No. 12, Clemson is just on the outside looking in at the College Football Playoff. But the Tigers could help their case on Saturday.
Hosting in-state rival and No. 15 ranked South Carolina, Clemson could notch a very meaningful win. And on top of being the best win the Tigers would have notched all season, it would be a strong final argument to make for the selection committee — assuming Clemson doesn’t back into the ACC title game.
While he didn’t comment on specifics of a hypothetical, CFP selection committee chair Warde Manuel acknowledged a win would surely help Clemson’s case to snag an at-large bid, when asked directly about the Tigers.
“I’ll continue to say we don’t look forward and we don’t project, but winning always helps. I will say that,” Manuel said. “When teams win, we value what they do. I don’t know what that would mean towards where they will be in projecting, but there is value in winning games.”
And it’s a boost that could cut both ways. As much as a win could help Clemson, it could be equally valuable to South Carolina as the Gamecocks try to get in position for an improbable at-large bid, one that would require some chaos ahead in the rankings.
Manuel also explained why Clemson slotted at No. 12 ahead of a cadre of SEC teams.
With Clemson slotted in at No. 12 in the latest College Football Playoff rankings, ahead of the likes of Alabama and Ole Miss, the decision of skeptics, despite the Tigers having a slightly better win-loss record.
Both the Crimson Tide and Rebels are 8-3, but have arguably better resumes than Clemson, which lacks many big wins. Nevertheless, the selection committee found the Tigers resume to be just enough to put them ahead, according to Manuel.
“Well, Clemson slid up with some losses ahead of them by Alabama and Mississippi, and they had a win against Citadel, obviously, but that wasn’t the big reason,” Manuel said. “Obviously they’re at 9-2, with only two losses. The teams right behind them have three losses. We just felt as a committee as we looked at their body of work, with three straight wins after their loss to Louisville, including back-to-back wins against Virginia Tech and Pitt, that they deserved to move up into that 12th position.”
Manuel also discussed how the committee came to the decision to delineate Alabama and Ole Miss as the No. 13 and No. 14 teams, respectively.
Three SEC teams – Alabama, Ole Miss and South Carolina – have three losses, and all eyes were on where they’d come in during the fourth rankings reveal.
Ultimately, Alabama came in as the highest-ranked of the group at No. 13, followed by Ole Miss at No. 14 and South Carolina at No. 15. According to Manuel, that decision was largely due to head-to-head matchups.
Manuel said the Crimson Tide’s resume – which includes wins over Georgia, Missouri and LSU – was a separator in the committee’s decision. But since Alabama and Ole Miss both have wins over South Carolina, that led them to come in at 13, 14 and 15, respectively.
-
Science1 week ago
Trump nominates Dr. Oz to head Medicare and Medicaid and help take on 'illness industrial complex'
-
Politics1 week ago
Trump taps FCC member Brendan Carr to lead agency: 'Warrior for Free Speech'
-
Technology1 week ago
Inside Elon Musk’s messy breakup with OpenAI
-
Health5 days ago
Holiday gatherings can lead to stress eating: Try these 5 tips to control it
-
News1 week ago
They disagree about a lot, but these singers figure out how to stay in harmony
-
Health2 days ago
CheekyMD Offers Needle-Free GLP-1s | Woman's World
-
Science2 days ago
Despite warnings from bird flu experts, it's business as usual in California dairy country
-
Politics1 week ago
Size of slim Republican House majority hangs on 5 uncalled races