North Carolina
NC sports wagering bill advances through first House committee
A invoice to legalize cellular sports activities wagering in North Carolina cleared the Home Commerce Committee on Tuesday, step one this 12 months in permitting betting on sports activities from cellphones and different digital units.
Related laws failed by a single vote within the Home in 2022, however supporters are optimistic about its possibilities this 12 months.
“You may need heard slightly bit about it. It has been broadly publicized,” stated Rep. Jason Saine, a Lincoln County Republican, and the invoice’s main proponent.
Mentioned Rep. Zack Hawkins, a Durham Democrat and one other major sponsor: “We all know that a few of your imagine that playing is a vice. However very similar to we enable for taxes on alcohol and cigarettes, we will use this income from the exercise, that’s broadly occurring in our state, for good.”
Two amendments geared toward altering the invoice failed within the Commerce Committee. One would have prohibited bank cards from getting used to fund accounts and make bets. The opposite would have allowed betting on skilled sports activities, however not some other video games, together with school.
“It’s a fiction to recommend that the quantity of playing on this state or wherever else is mounted, and that we’re simply shifting it from the illegitimate offshore place that it is at the moment positioned to a regulated and managed place,” stated Deb Butler, a New Hanover Democrat, who voted in opposition to the invoice.
“We all know that playing goes to exponentially enhance in North Carolina if we go down this path.”
Butler pointed to New Jersey the place the quantity wagered greater than doubled between 2019 and 2022. Operators in New Jersey took greater than $11 billion in sports activities bets in 2022. In 2019, that determine was $4.5 billion.
“Why will we need to facilitate one thing that we all know has the capability to destroy that many individuals’s households?” Butler stated. “If you’ve received these unrelenting advertisements, and it is fixed. We all know that younger impressionable individuals are going to be notably susceptible.”
Of the 26 members on the committee, 15 are sponsors of the invoice. There are 55 sponsors within the 120-member Home, together with Rep. Robert Reives, a Chatham County Democrat, who voted no on related laws final 12 months.
The invoice has help and opposition from Republicans and Democrats.
Gov. Roy Cooper, a supporter of legalization, included $85 million from sports activities wagering tax income in his just lately launched two-year finances.
“Lots of people this time will not be taking something as a right,” Cooper stated final week. “I feel as numerous lobbying occurred early, folks received constructive responses from legislators, they usually did not do the issues they wanted to do to shut. I feel this time no person is taking something as a right.”
Underneath the invoice, as at the moment written. cellular sports activities wagering may start in North Carolina on Jan. 1. The invoice permits for 10 to 12 operators to safe $1 million licenses to just accept cellular bets within the state. Operators can be charged a 14% privilege tax on gross income. They’d be capable to write-off prices related to buying new prospects, similar to free or promotional bets, for as much as three years.
Tax income can be allotted to varied pursuits within the state, together with the athletic departments at seven UNC System public schools. Hawkins stated supporters will amend the invoice so as to add UNC-Wilmington, UNC-Greensboro and Western Carolina to the athletic departments that obtain funding.
The athletic departments would obtain $300,000 yearly after which 10% of the income left after different monies are distributed.
The one athletic departments that may not obtain tax income from sports activities playing are people who sponsor soccer on the highest stage: App State, Charlotte, East Carolina, NC State and UNC-Chapel Hill.
“Is that dangling cash in entrance of them to get their favorable vote,” Rep. Marcia Morey, a Durham Democrat, advised WRAL earlier than the vote. “I hate to suppose so, nevertheless it type of seems that approach.”
Morey swam for the US within the 1976 Olympics. She later was the primary feminine investigator for the NCAA and investigated recruiting violations amongst big-time school soccer packages.
“We’re turning athletic competitors and the purity of it into playing.” stated Morey, who will not be a member of the commerce committee. “And as a former athlete, I simply suppose that is horrible. Anytime you are not trying on the sport, you are trying on the odds and the bets, it completely modifications the character of every thing.”
Throughout final 12 months’s Home votes, opponents of cellular sports activities betting have been capable of strip wagering on school sports activities from the laws. Rep. John Autry, a Mecklenburg County Democrat, tried to do it once more Tuesday.
“If we’ll do that, I do not see any purpose that we should always sully our beloved school sports activities or beginner sports activities in North Carolina,” Autry stated in committee. “I do know we’re all huge followers of school sports activities. And this invoice, I am afraid, would simply sully the entire great factor that we get pleasure from in North Carolina.”
Saine stated eradicating school sports activities from the invoice would “severely handicap the intent of the laws” and sharply scale back the quantity of income generated by the invoice.
Rep. John Bradford, a Mecklenburg County Republican, pointed to modifications in school athletics, together with enlargement of the school soccer playoff and title, picture and likeness funds as causes to not deal with school athletics otherwise.
“We’re now paying school gamers,” Bradford stated. “On the finish of the day, school sports activities has modified earlier than our eyes. … Faculty athletes at the moment are capable of generate income underneath NIL and so, subsequently, it’s clear that school sports activities is a giant enterprise.”
North Carolina
Former North Carolina, Arkansas QB Jacolby Criswell signs with surprising school
North Carolina transfer quarterback Jacolby Criswell has signed to play for East Tennessee State in 2025, On3’s Pete Nakos confirmed. He spent four total seasons in Chapel Hill and will have one year of eligibility remaining.
Criswell played the first three seasons of his college career with the Tar Heels before transferring to Arkansas ahead of 2023. He played one year in Fayetteville before deciding to come back to North Carolina ahead of this season.
Criswell didn’t begin as the starter this past season but took over after Max Johnson went down with injury. He finished the year with 2,459 yards and 15 touchdowns to six interceptions.
This story will be updated.
North Carolina
North Carolina among 18 states suing to stop Trump’s order blocking birthright citizenship
WASHINGTON, D.C. (WITN) – Attorneys general from 18 states sued Tuesday to block President Donald Trump’s move to end a decades-old immigration policy known as birthright citizenship guaranteeing that U.S.-born children are citizens regardless of their parents’ status.
Trump’s roughly 700-word executive order, issued late Monday, amounts to a fulfillment of something he’s talked about during the presidential campaign. But whether it succeeds is far from certain amid what is likely to be a lengthy legal battle over the president’s immigration policies.
North Carolina is one of the 18 states challenging the executive order. Attorney General Jeff Jackson is asking the court to invalidate the executive order and stop it from being implemented.
“This executive order is a straightforward violation of the Fourteenth Amendment, which guarantees citizenship to all people born on U.S. soil. For over a century, this principle has been upheld by the Supreme Court and remains a bedrock of our constitutional framework,” said Jackson.
Attorney General Jackson says the Constitution leaves no room for reinterpreting this matter.
“As Attorney General, my role is straightforward as well: to defend the Constitution. That’s why I’ve joined this lawsuit, to uphold the rule of law and preserve the rights that have defined our nation for generations,” said Jackson.
Here’s a closer look at birthright citizenship, Trump’s executive order and reaction to it:
What is birthright citizenship?
Birthright citizenship means anyone born in the U.S. is a citizen, regardless of their parents’ immigration status. People, for instance, in the United States on a tourist or other visa or in the country illegally can become the parents of a citizen if their child is born here.
It’s been in place for decades and enshrined in the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, supporters say. But Trump and allies dispute the reading of the amendment and say there need to be tougher standards on becoming a citizen.
What does Trump’s order say?
The order questions that the 14th Amendment extends citizenship automatically to anyone born in the United States.
The 14th Amendment was born in the aftermath of the Civil War and ratified in 1868. It says: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”
Trump’s order excludes the following people from automatic citizenship: those whose mothers were not legally in the United States and whose fathers were not U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents; people whose mothers were in the country legally but on a temporary basis and whose fathers were not citizens or legal permanent residents.
It goes on to bar federal agencies from recognizing the citizenship of people in those categories. It takes effect 30 days from Tuesday, on Feb. 19.
What is the history of the issue?
The 14th Amendment did not always guarantee birthright citizenship to all U.S.-born people. Congress did not authorize citizenship for all Native Americans born in the United States, for instance, until 1924.
In 1898 an important birthright citizenship case unfolded in the U.S. Supreme Court. The court held that Wong Kim Ark, who was born in San Francisco to Chinese immigrants, was a U.S. citizen because he was born in the country. After a trip abroad, he had faced denied reentry by the federal government on the grounds that he wasn’t a citizen under the Chinese Exclusion Act.
But some advocates of immigration restrictions have argued that while the case clearly applied to children born to parents who are both legal immigrants, it’s less clear whether it applies to children born to parents without legal status.
What has the reaction to Trump’s order been?
Eighteen states, plus the District of Columbia and San Francisco sued in federal court to block Trump’s order.
New Jersey Democratic Attorney General Matt Platkin said Tuesday that presidents might have broad authority but they are not kings.
“The president cannot, with a stroke of a pen, write the 14th Amendment out of existence, period,” he said.
Connecticut Attorney General William Tong, a U.S. citizen by birthright and the nation’s first Chinese American elected attorney general, said the lawsuit was personal for him.
“The 14th Amendment says what it means, and it means what it says —- if you are born on American soil, you are an American. Period. Full stop,” he said. “There is no legitimate legal debate on this question. But the fact that Trump is dead wrong will not prevent him from inflicting serious harm right now on American families like my own.”
Not long after Trump signed the order, immigrant rights groups filed suit to stop it.
Chapters of the American Civil Liberties Union in New Hampshire, Maine and Massachusetts along with other immigrant rights advocates filed a suit in New Hampshire federal court.
The suit asks the court to find the order to be unconstitutional. It highlights the case of a woman identified as “Carmen,” who is pregnant but is not a citizen. The lawsuit says she has lived in the United States for more than 15 years and has a pending visa application that could lead to permanent status. She has no other immigration status, and the father of her expected child has no immigration status either, the suit says.
“Stripping children of the ‘priceless treasure’ of citizenship is a grave injury,” the suit said. “It denies them the full membership in U.S. society to which they are entitled.”
In addition to North Carolina, New Jersey and the two cities, California, Massachusetts, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Mexico, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Wisconsin joined the lawsuit to stop the order.
Copyright 2025 WITN. All rights reserved.
North Carolina
Tropical Storm Helene destroyed nearly 1,000 homes in NC, FEMA maps show
McDowell County resident shares his story of loss from Helene floods in western North Carolina
Chris Loftis shares his story of the Tropical Storm Helene floods along Highway 80 in McDowell County.
Tropical Storm Helene destroyed nearly 1,000 homes when it tore through Western North Carolina Sept. 27, maps from the Federal Emergency Management Agency show.
The maps, which show verified damage to homes as of Jan. 7, were presented to the Buncombe County Board of Commissioners at its Jan. 16 budget retreat.
In Buncombe County, Helene destroyed 340 homes, according to the maps. More than 170 were owner-occupied, while the remaining were rental properties.
The maps also show how many homes across the state sustained major damage and how many require repairs so residents can move back in.
According to the maps, 2,360 homes suffered major damage. Nearly one-third were rentals. Additionally, nearly 30,000 homes require habitability repairs, according to the maps. More than 6,000 of those homes were occupied by renters.
The number of damaged homes verified by FEMA is significantly lower than initial estimates from the state. According to a Dec. 13 damage needs assessment compiled by the N.C. Office of State Budget and Management, more than 73,000 homes were projected to be damaged, the majority of which were expected to be single-family and manufactured homes, and duplexes. In total, the state is estimating nearly $13 billion in residential damage alone.
The Citizen Times requested updated damage maps from FEMA on Jan. 17.
How did homes in Buncombe, Henderson, McDowell, Madison and Yancey counties fare?
Destroyed homes:
Buncombe: 340
Henderson: 89
McDowell: 92
Yancey: 100
Madison:11+
Major damage:
Buncombe: 640
Henderson: 354
McDowell: 128
Yancey: 166
Madison: 56
Homes requiring habitability repairs:
Buncombe: 8,920
Henderson: 3,988
McDowell: 1,442
Yancey: 1,767
Madison: 302
Jacob Biba is the county watchdog reporter at the Asheville Citizen Times, part of the USA TODAY Network. Email him at jbiba@citizentimes.com.
-
Technology1 week ago
L’Oréal’s new skincare gadget told me I should try retinol
-
Technology7 days ago
Super Bowl LIX will stream for free on Tubi
-
Business1 week ago
Why TikTok Users Are Downloading ‘Red Note,’ the Chinese App
-
Technology5 days ago
Nintendo omits original Donkey Kong Country Returns team from the remaster’s credits
-
Culture4 days ago
American men can’t win Olympic cross-country skiing medals — or can they?
-
Technology1 week ago
Meta is already working on Community Notes for Threads
-
Politics5 days ago
U.S. Reveals Once-Secret Support for Ukraine’s Drone Industry
-
Culture2 days ago
Book Review: ‘Somewhere Toward Freedom,’ by Bennett Parten