North Carolina
NC appeals board to review disqualification that cost track team a state championship
A state-run appeals board is reviewing a call by an official that cost a Charlotte high school the state track and field championship last weekend.
A three-member panel appointed from members of the North Carolina State Board of Education’s Independent Interscholastic Athletic Appeals Board will review the disqualification of Mallard Creek High School, which has drawn national attention. The state legislature created the appeals board in 2023 as part of a broader reshaping of high school athletics administration.
The appeals board is appointed by the State Superintendent of Public Instruction, an elected official. A spokesperson for the Department’s Office of Athletics told WRAL News that they will issue a decision within 30 days.
“This process is intended to provide a fair opportunity for a thorough review of the officiating decision,” the North Carolina High School Athletic Association said in a statement Tuesday morning. “Following the established appeals process outlined in the NCHSAA Handbook and state procedures, Mallard Creek High School has exercised its right to such an appeal through the Independent Interscholastic Athletic Appeals Board administered by the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction. The NCHSAA respects the right of member schools to utilize that process and appreciates the importance of ensuring all concerns are heard through the appropriate review structure.“
The appeals board is composed of retired professional educators with experience overseeing high school athletics programs, including former superintendents and athletic directors. The panel for this appeal has not yet been finalized.
The board is now tasked with making a determination about the events that took place Saturday at the 8A state track championship in Greensboro.
Mallard Creek boys track and field athlete Nyan Brown held his hand up in celebration as he prepared to cross the finish line to win the 4×400-meter relay, the meet’s final event. An official near the finish line deemed the action a disqualifier, calling it unsportsmanlike behavior.
In 2025, Brown won the 4A Indoor Track and Field Farm Bureau Sportsmanship Award, which recognizes “players who have demonstrated the ideals of outstanding character and sportsmanship throughout the 2024-25 season.”
Without the points from the final relay, the Mallard Creek boys track and field team finished second. Durham’s Jordan High School won the title.
Mallard Creek head coach Samuel Willoughby said that Brown held up his hand to indicate what would’ve been Mallard Creek’s fifth overall state championship in boys track and field.
“After the 4×400 relay, we were so excited because we knew going in that we could win the state championship if we got the points we needed in the relay,” Mallard Creek head coach Samuel Willoughby said. “So, we just were thrilled that it happened and the way it happened and to end in good fashion with our ace, Nyan, at the anchor.
“So, it was a great feeling to see it actually happen, but then, once I saw the official threw the flag up, I just couldn’t believe it. I was in disbelief.”
Coaches and athletes are expected to show “good sportsmanship” and competitors who engage in taunting, profanity, baton throwing and refuse to follow the instructions of meet officials can be disqualified from the event or the meet, according to meet information. The same rule sheet also says “showboating” will not be tolerated and will result in disqualification. Those terms are not described further in the rules.
Willoughby said he knew the flag was against his team. He said he also got called into the infield on Saturday for the disqualification of another runner.
“I was in the infield more than I needed to be,” Willoughby said. “So, when I saw the flag, I was like, ‘Here we go again.’”
The officials said Mallard Creek received a warning for taunting after Brown won the 300-meter hurdles earlier in the day, setting a state record. Brown appeared to briefly flex toward photographers after winning the race, according to video from the meet. Mallard Creek disputed claims that they were given an initial warning.
“[There are] claims that she gave Nyan a warning beforehand, but that never happened,” Willoughby said. “She said that she gave him a warning to justify the flag that she gave at the end.”
Willoughby said he spoke with Brown and asked him to speak with the official.
“When did we have this conversation of you warning me?” Willoughby said. “And, it never happened. The only thing she said was, “Yeah, I spoke to him. I spoke to him.’
“It became my word against hers.”
The disqualification has attracted intense interest on social media with former players, track athletes and commentators weighing in on the issue.
Watch: Mallard Creek track coach discusses disqualification: ‘I was in disbelief’
On Tuesday morning, the NCHSAA released a new statement as backlash over the call against Brown has continued to mount. The association confirmed the start of the larger appeal process and said it would not comment as the process is in motion.
“Over the past several days, the conclusion of the 8A Men’s Track and Field Championship has generated significant discussion across North Carolina and beyond. The NCHSAA recognizes and understands there is deep disappointment experienced by the student-athletes, coaches, and the school community involved. “As previously stated, officiating decisions made during competition are judgment calls administered by certified meet officials under NFHS playing rules and NCHSAA rules relative to unsporting behavior and actions, and are considered final decisions. The Association appreciates the efforts of the officials who are tasked with applying and enforcing those rules during our championship events. “Under state law, an aggrieved party may challenge the decision of an official that results in disqualification by appealing to an independent appeals board appointed by the State Superintendent of Public Instruction. This process is intended to provide a fair opportunity for a thorough review of the officiating decision. Following the established appeals process outlined in the NCHSAA Handbook and state procedures, Mallard Creek High School has exercised its right to such an appeal through the Independent Interscholastic Athletic Appeals Board administered by the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction. The NCHSAA respects the right of member schools to utilize that process and appreciates the importance of ensuring all concerns are heard through the appropriate review structure.
“Because that process is underway, the NCHSAA will not provide further public comment regarding the specifics of the matter.”
Watch: North Carolina high school runner’s raised hand costs team state track and field title
North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Director Brad Alford also released a statement on Tuesday.
“The Independent Interscholastic Athletics Appeals Board has received an appeal from Mallard Creek High School regarding a ruling at the State Track & Field Meet,” Alford wrote. “State Board of Education Policy ATHL-013 outlines a detailed process for reviewing appeals of decisions by an athletics rule administrator, in this case the NCHSAA.
“The Appeals Board is currently reviewing the appeal and will issue a decision within 30 days. Since the appeal remains pending before the Appeals Board, we are unable to comment further on the case at this time.”
A spokesperson for the Department’s Office of Athletics tells WRAL News that they will issue a decision within 30 days.
At this point, the three-member appeals panel hasn’t been selected.
As this is not a time-sensitive case, with the season concluded, the review process could take time to complete.
According to Alford, the appeals board is made up of retired professional educators with experience overseeing high school athletics programs, including former superintendents and athletic directors. Appeals are heard by three-member panels, but the panel for this particular appeal has not yet been finalized.
Note: HighSchoolOT Managing Editor Joel Bryant and WRAL anchor/reporter Ashley Rowe contributed to this story.
North Carolina
‘Blessed and thankful’: New home dedicated to Helene-impacted veteran in WNC
SWANNANOA, N.C. (WLOS) — After more than a year and a half spent living in the aftermath of what Hurricane Helene took from him, one Marine Corps veteran has finally stepped into his new home.
During the storm, a tree fell on the home of local veteran Billy Ricketts III, and he had been living in a camper on his property ever since. On Monday, May 18, Purple Heart Homes and Valley Strong Disaster Relief dedicated a new home to him.
Purple Heart Homes, Inc. has helped over 4,000 veterans all across the country. The nonprofit organization serves veterans with critical home repairs, building ramps, HVAC systems and building modular homes to give to veterans.
‘YOU JUST HAVE TO FIX IT’: CANTON FAMILY RETURNS HOME 19 MONTHS AFTER HELENE
Leah Gutierrez, director of program services for Purple Heart Homes, said the organization wanted to send homes to western North Carolinian veterans impacted by Helene. The nonprofit partnered with Valley Strong Disaster Relief to meet Ricketts and get him the help he needed.
“He was a little hesitant at first, you know, most veterans are because some feel that they’re not as deserving or that someone else deserves it more than them,” Gutierrez said.
But on Monday, it felt surreal.
19 MONTHS LATER, HELENE RECOVERY IN MADISON COUNTY IS FAR FROM OVER
“[I’m] just blessed and thankful for my community,” Ricketts said. “Means a lot, coming home and seeing members of the community are pitching in to help one another.”
“For him to be able to transition from that to a stable home, I mean, our logo is ‘Healing Hearts One Home at a Time,’ and so if we’re able to do that for each veteran, then we’ve done our mission,” Gutierrez said.
Ricketts said he is looking forward to some peace and quiet as the new home represents the next chapter of his life.
North Carolina
Evaluating North Carolina’s 2026 Ceiling and Floor in ACC
With North Carolina’s activity in the transfer portal and recruiting pool coming to a close, although there are a couple of players to keep tabs on in the coming days, it is time to start evaluating how next season could look in Chapel Hill.
Big picture, 2026 is about head coach Michael Malone establishing a foundational culture for multiple years. Tar Heel fans are going to expect nothing less than a deep tournament run, but North Carolina needs to take the required baby steps. Coming off a second consecutive first-round exit, the Tar Heels need to at least win one game in the NCAA Tournament, but even then, their fans will not be satisfied if they fail to advance past the first weekend.
If North Carolina wants to be in the best position possible in the revamped 76-team field, winning as many games in conference play and orchestrating a formidable run in the ACC tournament will go a long way in setting itself up nicely for a potential run in March. With that being said, here are the Tar Heels’ ceiling and floor in the ACC next season.
Ceiling: Third Place
It is tough to imagine North Carolina cracking the top-two threshold in the conference, with Duke and Louisville as the clear top ACC teams. While the Blue Devils retained four key rotational players and compiled the No. 1 overall 2026 class, the Cardinals went all in on the transfer portal, signing Flory Bidunga, Jackson Sheldstad, Karter Knox, and Alvaro Folgueiras. Not to mention, Louisville landed five-star center Obinna Ekezie Jr., who reclassified from 2027 and will be part of the 2026 rotation.
Quite frankly, there is too much firepower on those two teams for North Carolina to keep pace with. That being said, Malone’s coaching should elevate the Tar Heels and at least surpass their fourth-place finish last season.
Floor: Fifth Place
This would be a major disappointment, and there would be salt in the wound when assessing that this would be a worse finish than last season. North Carolina has the coaching and talent to finish inside the top three, but a couple of under-the-radar teams could emerge as legitimate threats in the ACC.
Virginia and Miami each finished above the Tar Heels in 2025, and the Cavaliers are returning the majority of their roster. Meanwhile, Miami has signed a couple of underrated players from the transfer portal who should help offset losses across the roster. Nevertheless, North Carolina cannot afford to miss out on a double-bye in the conference tournament, which is awarded to the top four teams at the end of the regular season.
Follow
North Carolina
NC bill seeks protections for immigrant students amid ICE fears
More than 20,000 students were absent from Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools during immigration enforcement operations last fall, according to district reporting, a wave of fear that helped spark a new bill in the North Carolina General Assembly aimed at protecting immigrant students in public schools.
House Bill 1061, titled the “Plyler Educational Protections,” would reinforce students’ right to public education and establish clearer guidance for how schools respond to federal immigration enforcement requests.
Sammy Salkin, a senior policy strategist for the ACLU of North Carolina, said the legislation was created with one focus in mind.
“We want to make it clear that all children in North Carolina, regardless of immigration status, have a constitutional right to a free public school education,” Salkin said.
Salkin said the bill references Plyler v. Doe, the United States Supreme Court decision guaranteeing children access to public education no matter their citizenship status.
Salkin said North Carolina immigrant communities across the state have experienced increasing fear over the past year after “Operation Charlotte’s Web” in November 2025. This initiative was a Department of Homeland Security immigration enforcement operation in which many people were arrested across the Charlotte area and the surrounding regions of North Carolina.
“We have seen those attacks reproduced here by our state legislators in North Carolina,” Salkin said. “A lot of our work to try to protect our immigrant neighbors has been focused on trying to stop or mitigate harmful bills to the degree possible.”
Salkin said many students feared what would happen to their families while they were away at school.
“We’ve heard from young children that they’re afraid that they’re going to come home and their house will be empty because their parents will have been picked up by ICE or CBP,” Salkin said.
Bekah Brown, policy specialist for Education Justice Alliance, said her organization made a quick shift in its focus as immigration enforcement concerns escalated.
“It did feel for our organization kind of like it was just an overnight rapid response that had to occur,” Brown said.
Brown described some of the immediate actions organizers took to support families.
“Our organizers went into making safety plans with parents, making power of attorneys with parents,” Brown said. “We were walking kids to and from bus stops because they were scared to even walk their kids to the bus stops.”
But Brown also said that at that moment, she knew legislative action needed to be taken.
“It felt like there was a disconnect between what the school districts were saying and what was actually being implemented,” Brown said. “And so really, that was what we were trying to address: ‘how can public schools work best?’”
State Representative Julia Greenfield, one of the bill’s primary sponsors, said the legislation is intended to accomplish the goal of making schools safe environments for students.
“Every child should be able to walk into their school and into their classroom, and know that they are accepted, and that they are protected,” Greenfield said.
Greenfield said she became motivated to pursue immigration-related legislation after hearing alarming reports from her constituents.
“There are seven black Suburban’s outside of the church preschool, and ICE is there, and they are all dressed in tactical gear,” Greenfield said. “The kids are scared, we have got to do something.”
Despite support from advocacy groups and Democratic lawmakers, Greenfield said she does not expect the legislation to advance this session.
“I don’t believe that it will go anywhere here in the legislature because we are in the minority,” Greenfield said. “The Republican majority is not interested in legislation that would keep ICE and CBP out of our schools.”
Still, Salkin said the bill communicates broader values and priorities.
“It still is really important to be signaling to the North Carolina population where our values are and what we want to see as the future for our state,” Salkin said.
Greenfield said she hopes the legislation lays the groundwork for future efforts.
“We’re sharing with our constituents, with the people of North Carolina, with our immigrant communities: this is what we want to do,” Greenfield said. “And this is what we will do, if we can get in charge.”
-
California5 minutes agoWildfire Crews Race to Keep Fierce California Blaze From Former Nuclear Reactor Site – Inside Climate News
-
Colorado11 minutes agoWhere Colorado’s class of 2027 ranks after Ba’Roc Willis’ commitment
-
Connecticut17 minutes agoMan killed in Glastonbury crash
-
Delaware23 minutes agoFormer Wilmington Mayor Mike Purzycki dies at 80
-
Florida29 minutes agoRoger Goodell says NFL is cooperating with Florida AG after receiving subpoena
-
Georgia35 minutes agoIn Georgia, Republican primary for governor goes to a runoff between Trump backers
-
Hawaii41 minutes agoSpotlight Now: Exploring Hawaii’s economy from strain to solutions
-
Illinois53 minutes ago2026 Illinois (IHSA) High School Softball Playoffs: Brackets, Schedules – May 19