Connect with us

North Carolina

Auto leaders’ venture company picks North Carolina global headquarters

Published

on

Auto leaders’ venture company picks North Carolina global headquarters


A venture company founded by seven of the world’s largest automakers will make North Carolina its global headquarters, backed by more than $3 million in taxpayer subsidy as potential reimbursement.

IONNA says it is purpose-built to “lead, innovate, create, and drive forward a redefinition of charging as an end-to-end integrated customer experience” in the electric automotive industry. BMW, General Motors, Honda, Hyundai, Mercedes-Benz, Kia, and Stellantis formed the coalition with the idea of “reimagining electric vehicle charging.”

The company’s launch includes a plan to design, develop, build and operate a high-powered electric vehicle charging network “key to increased EV adoption in North America.”

A company release says the site will “house a customer experience lab serving as the quarterback and central node to seven new satellite labs at each of the founding” coalition members’ facilities.

Advertisement

North Carolina landed the start-up in part because of a Job Development Investment Grant approved by the Economic Investment Committee on Tuesday.

The 12-year grant authorizes potential reimbursement of $3,075,000 over 12 years.

IONNA says it is purpose-built to “lead, innovate, create, and drive forward a redefinition of charging as an end-to-end integrated customer experience” in the electric automotive industry.” Getty Images

The state and IONNA say the lifetime of the grant will grow the state’s economy by $724 million, generate 203 new jobs, and return 108% on public dollars.

That’s $2.08 per $1 cost to the state.

The Department of Commerce says the average annual wage at IONNA will be $128,457 and listed the Durham County average at $90,727.

Advertisement

The department justifies incentives based on the new jobs businesses will bring to the state, announcing the average hourly wage for the new jobs and comparing it to the county’s median hourly wage.

Economists doubt the effectiveness of financial incentives for private businesses to expand or move to a new state.


Electric car plugged by cable to charging station with palm tree and old walls as background
The company’s launch includes a plan to design, develop, build and operate a high-powered electric vehicle charging network “key to increased EV adoption in North America.” malajscy – stock.adobe.com

They also question the use of hourly wages as an indicator because the salaries of a few corporate leaders can skew the average higher while not having the same impact on the median wage.

“The area’s established history of research, innovation, and its vibrant growing community make it the perfect place for IONNA to join, thrive and pioneer,” said CEO Seth Cutler in a company release. I’m excited to grow a cross-industry team that will deliver the IONNA vision from our new home base.”

In a release from the state, Commerce Secretary Machelle Baker Sanders said, “When advanced manufacturers commit to North Carolina, it confirms the importance of our ‘First in Talent’ plan which leads the charge in prioritizing the development of diverse and well-trained workforce to help companies blaze new trails.”

The announcement is one of several in the automotive industry for North Carolina this year and since the end of the COVID-19 era.

Advertisement

The state has twice consecutively earned the CNBC network’s No. 1 ranking for America’s Top States for Business.

Gov. Roy Cooper, when last July’s announcement was made, gave comments seeking credit and chastising the Republican majority Legislature – the people who enacted laws making the state more friendly to businesses expanding or seeking new homes.

The governor has long called public education “a state of emergency here” while businesses and population move in, and school choice registration wait lists grow.

The equation creates a workforce talent level, and the governor acknowledged that in reaction to the decision.

“This cutting-edge company and its founding automotive manufacturers will benefit from the innovative ecosystem, highly skilled workforce, and central location of North Carolina to take its pioneering technology to market,” Cooper said Tuesday.

Advertisement

According to a January analysis by Consumer Affairs, global market share ranks were No. 3 by Honda, No. 4 by Hyundai, No. 5 by Kia, No. 7 by BMW and No. 8 by Mercedes.



Source link

North Carolina

Former North Carolina, Arkansas QB Jacolby Criswell signs with surprising school

Published

on

Former North Carolina, Arkansas QB Jacolby Criswell signs with surprising school


North Carolina transfer quarterback Jacolby Criswell has signed to play for East Tennessee State in 2025, On3’s Pete Nakos confirmed. He spent four total seasons in Chapel Hill and will have one year of eligibility remaining.

Criswell played the first three seasons of his college career with the Tar Heels before transferring to Arkansas ahead of 2023. He played one year in Fayetteville before deciding to come back to North Carolina ahead of this season.

Criswell didn’t begin as the starter this past season but took over after Max Johnson went down with injury. He finished the year with 2,459 yards and 15 touchdowns to six interceptions.

This story will be updated.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

North Carolina

North Carolina among 18 states suing to stop Trump’s order blocking birthright citizenship

Published

on

North Carolina among 18 states suing to stop Trump’s order blocking birthright citizenship


WASHINGTON, D.C. (WITN) – Attorneys general from 18 states sued Tuesday to block President Donald Trump’s move to end a decades-old immigration policy known as birthright citizenship guaranteeing that U.S.-born children are citizens regardless of their parents’ status.

Trump’s roughly 700-word executive order, issued late Monday, amounts to a fulfillment of something he’s talked about during the presidential campaign. But whether it succeeds is far from certain amid what is likely to be a lengthy legal battle over the president’s immigration policies.

North Carolina is one of the 18 states challenging the executive order. Attorney General Jeff Jackson is asking the court to invalidate the executive order and stop it from being implemented.

“This executive order is a straightforward violation of the Fourteenth Amendment, which guarantees citizenship to all people born on U.S. soil. For over a century, this principle has been upheld by the Supreme Court and remains a bedrock of our constitutional framework,” said Jackson.

Advertisement

Attorney General Jackson says the Constitution leaves no room for reinterpreting this matter.

“As Attorney General, my role is straightforward as well: to defend the Constitution. That’s why I’ve joined this lawsuit, to uphold the rule of law and preserve the rights that have defined our nation for generations,” said Jackson.

Here’s a closer look at birthright citizenship, Trump’s executive order and reaction to it:

What is birthright citizenship?

Birthright citizenship means anyone born in the U.S. is a citizen, regardless of their parents’ immigration status. People, for instance, in the United States on a tourist or other visa or in the country illegally can become the parents of a citizen if their child is born here.

It’s been in place for decades and enshrined in the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, supporters say. But Trump and allies dispute the reading of the amendment and say there need to be tougher standards on becoming a citizen.

Advertisement

What does Trump’s order say?

The order questions that the 14th Amendment extends citizenship automatically to anyone born in the United States.

The 14th Amendment was born in the aftermath of the Civil War and ratified in 1868. It says: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”

Trump’s order excludes the following people from automatic citizenship: those whose mothers were not legally in the United States and whose fathers were not U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents; people whose mothers were in the country legally but on a temporary basis and whose fathers were not citizens or legal permanent residents.

It goes on to bar federal agencies from recognizing the citizenship of people in those categories. It takes effect 30 days from Tuesday, on Feb. 19.

What is the history of the issue?

The 14th Amendment did not always guarantee birthright citizenship to all U.S.-born people. Congress did not authorize citizenship for all Native Americans born in the United States, for instance, until 1924.

Advertisement

In 1898 an important birthright citizenship case unfolded in the U.S. Supreme Court. The court held that Wong Kim Ark, who was born in San Francisco to Chinese immigrants, was a U.S. citizen because he was born in the country. After a trip abroad, he had faced denied reentry by the federal government on the grounds that he wasn’t a citizen under the Chinese Exclusion Act.

But some advocates of immigration restrictions have argued that while the case clearly applied to children born to parents who are both legal immigrants, it’s less clear whether it applies to children born to parents without legal status.

What has the reaction to Trump’s order been?

Eighteen states, plus the District of Columbia and San Francisco sued in federal court to block Trump’s order.

New Jersey Democratic Attorney General Matt Platkin said Tuesday that presidents might have broad authority but they are not kings.

“The president cannot, with a stroke of a pen, write the 14th Amendment out of existence, period,” he said.

Advertisement

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong, a U.S. citizen by birthright and the nation’s first Chinese American elected attorney general, said the lawsuit was personal for him.

“The 14th Amendment says what it means, and it means what it says —- if you are born on American soil, you are an American. Period. Full stop,” he said. “There is no legitimate legal debate on this question. But the fact that Trump is dead wrong will not prevent him from inflicting serious harm right now on American families like my own.”

Not long after Trump signed the order, immigrant rights groups filed suit to stop it.

Chapters of the American Civil Liberties Union in New Hampshire, Maine and Massachusetts along with other immigrant rights advocates filed a suit in New Hampshire federal court.

The suit asks the court to find the order to be unconstitutional. It highlights the case of a woman identified as “Carmen,” who is pregnant but is not a citizen. The lawsuit says she has lived in the United States for more than 15 years and has a pending visa application that could lead to permanent status. She has no other immigration status, and the father of her expected child has no immigration status either, the suit says.

Advertisement

“Stripping children of the ‘priceless treasure’ of citizenship is a grave injury,” the suit said. “It denies them the full membership in U.S. society to which they are entitled.”

In addition to North Carolina, New Jersey and the two cities, California, Massachusetts, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Mexico, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Wisconsin joined the lawsuit to stop the order.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

North Carolina

Tropical Storm Helene destroyed nearly 1,000 homes in NC, FEMA maps show

Published

on

Tropical Storm Helene destroyed nearly 1,000 homes in NC, FEMA maps show


play

Tropical Storm Helene destroyed nearly 1,000 homes when it tore through Western North Carolina Sept. 27, maps from the Federal Emergency Management Agency show.

The maps, which show verified damage to homes as of Jan. 7, were presented to the Buncombe County Board of Commissioners at its Jan. 16 budget retreat.

Advertisement

In Buncombe County, Helene destroyed 340 homes, according to the maps. More than 170 were owner-occupied, while the remaining were rental properties.

The maps also show how many homes across the state sustained major damage and how many require repairs so residents can move back in.

According to the maps, 2,360 homes suffered major damage. Nearly one-third were rentals. Additionally, nearly 30,000 homes require habitability repairs, according to the maps. More than 6,000 of those homes were occupied by renters.

The number of damaged homes verified by FEMA is significantly lower than initial estimates from the state. According to a Dec. 13 damage needs assessment compiled by the N.C. Office of State Budget and Management, more than 73,000 homes were projected to be damaged, the majority of which were expected to be single-family and manufactured homes, and duplexes. In total, the state is estimating nearly $13 billion in residential damage alone.

Advertisement

The Citizen Times requested updated damage maps from FEMA on Jan. 17.

How did homes in Buncombe, Henderson, McDowell, Madison and Yancey counties fare?

Destroyed homes:

Buncombe: 340

Advertisement

Henderson: 89

McDowell: 92

Yancey: 100

Madison:11+

Major damage:

Advertisement

Buncombe: 640

Henderson: 354

McDowell: 128

Yancey: 166

Madison: 56

Advertisement

Homes requiring habitability repairs:

Buncombe: 8,920

Henderson: 3,988

McDowell: 1,442

Yancey: 1,767

Advertisement

Madison: 302

Jacob Biba is the county watchdog reporter at the Asheville Citizen Times, part of the USA TODAY Network. Email him at jbiba@citizentimes.com.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending