Connect with us

Maryland

Maryland State Board of Elections sued for inaccurate voting records

Published

on

Maryland State Board of Elections sued for inaccurate voting records


BALTIMORE — A group of everyday Maryland voters, that also happens to include computer scientists and statisticians, combed through the last three years of data from the Maryland State Board of Elections They were alarmed by what they found.

“The voter rolls seem to be just rife with errors,” Ed Hartman, attorney for Maryland Election Integrity LLC, said.

The group claims to have found tens of thousands of errors in both the voter registration database and in the vote counts for the 2020 and 2022 general elections:

  • 79,349 Current Apparent Registration Violations
  • 62,075 Voting Violations in the 2020 General Election
  • 27,623 Voting Violations in the 2022 General Election

They took their data to the board of elections, but after getting no response, they filed a civil suit in federal court. Annapolis-based attorney Ed Hartman is representing them.

Advertisement

In the lawsuit, Hartman argues the Federal Election Commission sets a “maximum acceptable error rate” for voting systems: [all] systems shall achieve a report total error rate of no more than one in 125,000.”

He calculates that for the 2020 election, which had 3 million voters, the maximum allowable errors would have been about 24 errors, and in the 2022 election, which had about 2 million voters, about 16 errors.

“The law only allows for a handful of errors[…]and we have tens of thousands of them, so the magnitude beyond what federal law allows, is unfortunately easily established. And our goal is not at all to go back and attack what happened. Our goal is to go forward and try to clean it up.”

The group of voters make up an LLC called Maryland Election Integrity. Hartman says they most likely sought him out because they knew he represented Republican gubernatorial candidate Dan Cox in his 2022 court battle over whether the Board of Elections could begin counting mail-in ballots early, to avoid delays experienced during the primary. Cox’s effort was ultimately unsuccessful.

Maryland Election Integrity LLC is joined in the suit by another group, based in Missouri, called United Sovereign Americans, Inc. That organization says it’s preparing litigation in 23 states, including Maryland. The website bio for chairman Harry Haury says, “he was directly involved with elections systems analysis after the 2020 election where he was the first to advocate focusing on the obvious and massive election misconduct. He submitted expert testimony in several election challenges in 2020, including testimony filed before the Supreme Court.”

Advertisement

Asked whether Hartman is concerned the association with such politically polarizing cases will lead people to automatically disagree with the premise of this case, he said: “When I was representing Dan Cox, I have to say I was shocked at how he was treated by the media, and the ferocity of their feelings against him continue. Unfortunately, that covers anything, and I guess because I represented him I am somehow painted with that brush. But this has nothing to do with Mr. Cox, nothing to do with Mr. Trump, and nothing to do with past elections.”

“We’re not going back and saying a particular election was lost because of this. We don’t know, and we’re not going that route – it’s way too late, and that would be a much more difficult procedure. […] ​Our point is – we’re trying to catch it early, so that nobody has to worry about it. So we can maybe stop arguing about whether or not there was fraud in the election,” Hartman said.

In response to the lawsuit, Joanne Antoine, executive director for the advocacy group Common Cause Maryland said: “One of these groups was incorporated in Missouri. The other was founded by a lawyer in South Carolina. That should tell you all you need to know about their concerns for elections in Maryland. Maryland has some of the most secure elections in the country. Common Cause Maryland and our partners have worked hard over the last few decades to improve our post-election processes, learn from infrequent voting machine errors, and establish trust between election administrators and the communities they serve. This lawsuit is an attempt to sow doubt in the work we’ve done. We stand with the Board of Elections and election officials across the state, and we hope that this lawsuit is swiftly rejected by the court.”

Hartman responded: “That’s not at all what we’re about. We’re not going back and pointing fingers at anyone. We’re not even pointing fingers here; we’re not calling anyone a bad actor. What we’re saying is the data shows the system has gone beyond what is legally permitted. All we want to do is bring it back into compliance, so that people can believe in the system. Everyone should want that. I’m not sure why – you really gotta go far afield in your argument to say that it’s a bad idea to make sure the election system is in compliance federal and state law. We want that, and anyone who’s running for office certainly wants that.”

The Office of the Maryland Attorney General confirmed it is representing the state board of elections in this case, but declined to comment further.

Advertisement

In October 2023, a state audit found several issues with the board of election’s procedures, specifically with identifying dead and duplicate voters and getting them off the rolls.

The State Board of Elections (SBE) disputed most of the findings, either calling them either inaccurate, mischaracterized, or representative of a very small percentage of voter records. But the agency did agree to work to improve its procedures. The agency noted that in February 2023, an independent supervisory review of the programming and distribution of the ballot database was established, and will be used in all future elections. It also changed the oversight process of local election boards to ensure any identified errors are corrected in a timely manner, per the audit’s recommendation.

As part of its response, the SBE writes: “While SBE agrees to enhanced procedures to identify deceased and duplicate voters, it maintains that the current processes are comprehensive and effective and notes that OLA’s characterization of the current process and the figures in the discussion notes are mischaracterized. Moreover, the manual review required to enhance procedures will require additional staff given the current workload of the unit.”

SBE23 by Rushaad Hayward on Scribd

Advertisement





Source link

Maryland

Maryland Fishing Report

Published

on



It was a cloudy and overcast Memorial Day Weekend, not ideal for the beach and picnics, but a great one for fishing. Anglers across Maryland enjoyed a variety of different fishing adventures. Starting Monday June 1, fishing for striped bass will get a lot easier to understand when all waters of Maryland’s portion of the  Read the Rest…



Source link

Continue Reading

Maryland

Charter bus catches fire after tire blows out on Maryland interstate; Students evacuated

Published

on

Charter bus catches fire after tire blows out on Maryland interstate; Students evacuated


Traffic was snarled Wednesday morning along Interstate 70 in Washington County after a charter bus caught fire, the Maryland State Police (MSP) said.

Troopers responded to westbound I-70 at I-81 around 6:36 a.m. for the fire. MSP said the charter bus was traveling when a tire blew out.

SEE ALSO | 2-year-old dies days after Fairfax County crash that killed 2 adults

The driver pulled over, but then the bus started to catch fire. The driver and students were evacuated off safely, and no one was injured.

Advertisement
Comment with Bubbles

BE THE FIRST TO COMMENT

The fire has since been put out. All westbound lanes remained closed at this time.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Maryland

Maryland stops juveniles from automatic adult charges for many gun, assault crimes despite prosecutors’ warning

Published

on

Maryland stops juveniles from automatic adult charges for many gun, assault crimes despite prosecutors’ warning


Maryland will no longer automatically charge some juveniles as adults for several serious crimes.

Governor Wes Moore signed the Youth Charging Reform Act into law on Tuesday morning. 

Supporters praised it as giving young offenders a second chance, but opponents—including many prosecutors—said it gives young offenders a free pass. 

Governor Wes Moore signed the Youth Charging Reform Act into law on Tuesday morning. 

Advertisement

CBS News Baltimore


The impact of reform 

Juvenile crime has alarmed many across Maryland. Video WJZ Investigates obtained earlier this month shows a convenience store robbery in Baltimore, with suspects as young as 14. 

But advocates for charging reform said the state treats young offenders too harshly and locks many of them up without judicial discretion. 

They have been fighting for more than a decade to stop automatic adult charges for certain crimes—including for many handgun offenses and serious assaults. 

Advertisement

They finally won a victory with the governor signing the Youth Charging Reform Act.

“Maryland was automatically charging kids as young as 14 as adults for cases that almost always—almost always in the super majority of cases—ended back into the juvenile court anyway but only months after being locked up in jail and many times in solitary confinement,” said Senate President Bill Ferguson, a Baltimore City Democrat. “Nearly a semester of high school is gone. For you and I, that might not seem like a long time, but for 14-year-old or a 15-year-old, that is a lifetime.”

Ferguson stressed a statistic long cited by advocates for youth charging reform. 

“Here in Maryland, we charge more children as adults than in every other state other than Alabama,” Ferguson said. “This bill will change that. It keeps cases in the right court from the start, which actually and by the data makes us safer and is better for those young people.”

House Speaker Joseline Peña-Melnyk, a Democrat representing Anne Arundel and Prince George’s counties, echoed Ferguson’s comments at the signing ceremony. 

Advertisement

Peña-Melnyk said it shows lawmakers’ “commitment to giving people a better life” and noted her own experiences as a prosecutor and a public defender. 

“You need to give people an opportunity,” Peña-Melnyk said. “You need to give them second chances.”

Certain severe crimes including rape and murder still mandate adult charges. 

The new law also keeps juveniles out of adult prisons, away from the “sight and sound” of adult offenders, with rare exceptions.

What the numbers show

State data revealed in 2025 that 303 Maryland youth were charged as adults for gun crimes. More than 200 were charged as adults with first-degree assault.

Advertisement

Only 58 of those weapons charges stayed in adult court, along with only 38 of the first-degree assault charges.

youth2.jpg

State data revealed in 2025, 303 Maryland youth were charged as adults for gun crimes. 204 were charged as adults with first-degree assault.

CBS News Baltimore


The fiscal impact report on the bill also showed a drastic change for state’s attorneys’ offices across Maryland. 

Baltimore City will have to hire as many as 16 new employees, including 11 assistant state’s attorneys, to review the cases involving juveniles.

Advertisement

youth3.jpg

The fiscal impact report on the bill also showed a drastic change for state’s attorneys’ offices across Maryland. 

CBS News Baltimore


You can read the fiscal impact report here.

The law is also expected to address racial disparities, with a state analysis showing 77% of youth charged as adults in Maryland in 2025 are Black.      

youth4.jpg

The law is also expected to address racial disparities, with a state analysis showing 77% of youth charged as adults in Maryland in 2025 are Black.    

Advertisement

CBS News Baltimore


What prosecutors are saying 

Many top prosecutors, including Baltimore City State’s Attorney Ivan Bates, believe the charging reform is misguided. 

Bates, in his role as head of the state’s attorney’s association, told WJZ, “…The General Assembly chooses to ignore the data once again and pass legislation that will allow youth with guns who commit robberies and violent assaults to be given a free pass time after time when they are caught illegally carrying or using a firearm.”

Bates said prosecutors wanted the General Assembly to delay implementation of the reforms by three years to allow the Maryland Department of Juvenile Services to develop new programming to assist young offenders. 

“Instead, our request was ignored, and the members of the General Assembly vilified us for it,” Baltimore City’s top prosecutor wrote. 

Advertisement

Howard County State’s Attorney Rich Gibson cited the case of 19-year-old Emmetson Zeah who killed a 15- and a 16-year-old outside the Mall In Columbia

Gibson said Zeah was given multiple second chances before being sentenced to life without parole last week

youth5.jpg

Howard County State’s Attorney Rich Gibson cited the case of 19-year-old Emmetson Zeah who killed a 15- and a 16-year-old outside the Mall In Columbia

CBS News Baltimore


“Our broader system failed him long before we arrived at this moment,” Gibson said. In the span of two years, this defendant had six separate contacts with the justice system. The majority occurred within the juvenile justice system, and yet none of those interventions altered the trajectory that he was on—nor did they accurately recognize the escalating warning signs that ultimately led us to where we are today.” 

Advertisement

Gibson also told reporters, “Let me be clear, prosecutors across the state have never opposed appropriate juvenile diversion or rehabilitative efforts. We support keeping more youthful offenders in the juvenile system, but only once that system is equipped with the resources, the staffing, the accountability measures, and the evidence-based programming necessary to address specific factors that drive that juvenile behavior.”

Baltimore County State’s Attorney Scott Shellenberger denounced the reform law last week at a debate hosted by WJZ and The Banner

“I believe we should leave the laws the way they are in Maryland. Juveniles who commit violent crimes can be held accountable as adults,” Shellenberger said. “…We need to put more money into the juvenile justice system so that when they commit their first breaking-and-entering at the age of 14 or 15, we can get them the kind of help they and their family need, so that I don’t have to put them in jail for life when they’ve killed somebody at the age of 17.”

Public defender says reform “overdue”

“For more than a decade, Maryland has automatically routed children into adult criminal court based solely on the charge filed at arrest, without considering the child’s history, circumstances, or capacity for growth,” said Maryland Public Defender Natasha Dartigue. “Maryland does this for 33 separate offenses, which is more than any state in the country except Alabama. Yet 85 percent of those cases are ultimately dismissed or sent back to juvenile court anyway, often only after the children spend months in adult facilities without school, services, or meaningful family contact.”

While she praised the signing of the reform legislation, Dartigue noted there are still 26 offenses where juveniles are automatically charged as adults and called for further reforms. 

Advertisement

“The evidence is clear: automatic adult prosecution does not make communities safer,” Dartigue said. “It makes children more likely to reoffend, families less stable, and communities fractured at public expense. Every one of those 26 pathways is a choice Maryland is making with full knowledge of what that choice costs. It is a system we must change.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending