Maryland
Illinois vs. Maryland prediction: College basketball odds, pick
There are two certainties in college basketball betting this year.
First, Big Ten home teams win and cover.
Home teams in conference play are 52-41-2 ATS, covering 56% of the time.
Since the start of last season, Big Ten home teams are 132-97-3 ATS.
The Big Ten has the second-highest home-winning percentage of any conference this season, with home-court advantage winning out 72% of the time.
Second, ranked teams on the road either don’t cover or don’t win.
Ranked squads are 81-102-2 ATS on the road this season, and those squads are 26-37-1 as a favorite.
So, when I saw No. 14 Illinois was laying two points in College Park, Maryland, on Saturday, I had to bite.
Illinois vs. Maryland odds
| Team | Spread | Moneyline | Total |
| Illinois | -2.5 (-102) | -130 | o138.5 (-110) |
| Maryland | +2.5 (-120) | +108 | u138.5 (-110) |
(Via FanDuel)
Illinois vs. Maryland prediction
(5:30 p.m. ET, FOX)
But as I investigated the game more, I realized the Terps match up well with the Illini.
Maryland has won and covered four of the past five head-to-head matchups, thrice winning outright as underdogs.
That includes a matchup in Champaign earlier this season, where the Terps won by nine as nine-point ‘dogs.
There’s one main reason for that.
Both squads run every opposing offense off the 3-point line.
The Illini rank sixth nationally in 3-point rate allowed, while the Terps rank 13th.
They get there in different ways – Illinois runs a drop-coverage defense while Maryland spams mainly press coverage – but it has the same effect.
That being: Illinois vs Maryland generally devolves into an interior, 2-point shooting, post-up battle.
It’s all about paint buckets.
Maryland has a significant upper hand in that regard, specifically on defense.
The Terps are devastating on the defensive end. Julian Reese is among the nation’s best post-up defenders (.52 PPP allowed, 91st percentile), leading one of the nation’s better post-up defenses (.76 PPP allowed, 84th percentile).
Maryland allows only 28 paint points per game (84th percentile), blocks five shots a night (93rd percentile), and leads the Big Ten in 2-point shooting allowed (46%).
There’s a reason why Maryland ranks fifth nationally in defensive efficiency, and its interior wall is the main reason.
Illinois mainly tries to create offense through isolation and transition sets, leaning heavily on Terrence Shannon Jr. and Marcus Domask, with Coleman Hawkins and Quincy Gurrier getting action on the interior.
Unfortunately, Maryland is a rock-solid transition defense (.96 PPP allowed, 77th percentile) that’s even better defending on an island (.62 PPP allowed, 92nd percentile).
Jahmir Young, Julian Reese and Donta Scott are three of the Big Ten’s best isolation defenders.
Between those three and Reese, the Terps can match up with Illinois at every position.
Illinois will try to augment its offense with offensive rebounds and second-chance points, but that’ll be tough against a Terps defense that allows only .95 offensive rebound/second-chance PPP (93rd percentile).
Maryland’s interior defense will stand more than firm, and we can’t say the same for Illinois.
The Illini allow 35 paint points per game (16th percentile), which has jumped to 38 in conference play (fifth percentile).
The Illini don’t defend the rim particularly well (8% block rate, 12th in Big Ten) and are merely average against post-up sets (.86 PPP, 49th percentile).
The Terps funnel much of their offense through Reese in the post, but the Kevin Willard offense is mostly about Jahmir Young creating off the dribble.
And that’s huge against the Illini’s drop defense.
Drop-coverage schemes overplay ball handlers on the interior and force them toward an interior big man sagging toward the rim.
Thus, dribble-penetrating guards must create in the middle of the floor, and Young can do that.
In fact, the best way to beat Young and the Terps’ backcourt is to pressure them, given Maryland is the worst ball-handling team in the Big Ten.
But the drop is a passive coverage, so Illinois ranks second-to-last in the conference in defensive turnover rate.
Ultimately, I feel good about Young and Reese managing buckets against the Illini’s questionable, passive interior defense.
Betting on College Basketball?
Meanwhile, I don’t feel good about the Illini’s four big scorers creating individual offense against the Terps.
That’s precisely what happened in the prior matchup.
Reese scored nine of his 20 points on 12 post-up sets, while Young scored 28 on 11-for-20 shooting from 2-point rage.
Overall, the Terps scored 52 paint points while shooting 26 for 48 (54%) from inside the arc and dishing out 14 assists to only seven turnovers.
Meanwhile, the Illini managed only 26 paint points and shot a miserable 15 for 42 (36%) from 2-point range.
They were miserable in ball screens (four points on 14 sets) and posted a negative assist-to-turnover ratio (eight to nine).
Expect more of the same on Saturday and wager accordingly.
Illinois vs. Maryland pick
Maryland +2.5
Maryland
Maryland crab prices climb as catches fall
MARYLAND (WBFF) — Art D’Amico remembers when a bushel of crabs cost about $35 in the mid-1970s. Today, the president of the Annapolis Anglers Club pays nearly $400 a bushel — a price he says has climbed by at least $150 in the past five years.
“Everything’s more expensive,” said D’Amico, who has been involved in Chesapeake Bay fishing and crabbing since 1973, adding that he’s never seen crab prices like this before.
The soaring cost reflects more than inflation. Watermen, seafood dealers and economists say higher operating costs, shifting markets and concern about Maryland’s blue crab population are pushing prices higher, making one of the state’s signature summer traditions more expensive. But many Marylanders are still buying crabs, even at record prices.
“It’s definitely not what we’re accustomed to this time of year as far as quantity and price,” said John Ecker, a managing partner of Conrad’s Crabs, which has four locations in Maryland. “I’ve been here for 19 years doing this and, yeah, they’re getting higher.”
Read the full story on The Baltimore Sun.
Maryland
MD woman sentenced to 2 years, $6.8M restitution in multi-million-dollar laundering scheme
MARYLAND (WBFF) — A Maryland woman was sentenced to two years in prison for her involvement in a multi-million-dollar money laundering scheme, the U.S. Attorney’s Office of Maryland announced on Friday.
Fatoumata Boiro, 32, of Largo, will serve two years in prison, followed by two years of supervised release, and has also been ordered to pay $6,838,558.31 in restitution.
Boiro was found guilty of conspiring to engage in a large, multi-member money-laundering operation. She pled guilty to being involved in the conspiracy and acknowledged that at least $3 million was laundered through her direct participation.
From 2021 through February 2024, she and several other individuals laundered proceeds from a significant wire fraud scheme, according to court documents.
Court documents revealed that the conspirators engaged in various financial transactions to conceal the source, ownership, and control of the wire fraud proceeds, as well as their location.
ALSO READ | Former AACO police officer sentenced in insurance fraud scheme involving fake car thefts
The victims of this scheme included government agencies, organizations, and companies, such as an environmental trust, an urban redevelopment program, a medical center, a transportation company, a logistics company, a school district, a college, and a county government, officials reported.
Boiro and her co-conspirators created limited liability companies to act as shell entities, opened bank accounts in the names of these entities, and received and laundered funds from fraudulent activities.
Fourteen defendants have been charged in connection with the money-laundering conspiracy, with 13 already pleading guilty.
Officials reported that Faizou Gnora, 28, formerly of Alexandria, Virginia, remains at large.
The following includes the individuals previously sentenced:
- Yahya Sowe, 42, of College Park, to 114 months in prison, followed by three years of supervised release, restitution of $13,050,827.03, and forfeiture of $1 million
- Bright Boateng, 45, of Bladensburg, Maryland, to 108 months in prison, followed by three years of supervised release, restitution of $1,247,950, and a forfeiture of $431,750
- Victor Killen, 33, of Hyattsville, Maryland, to 63 months in prison, followed by three years of supervised release, restitution of $7,070,656.46, and a $3-million forfeiture order
- Gedeon Agbeyome, 31, of Montgomery County, Maryland, to 72 months in federal prison, followed by one year of supervised release, along with restitution of $2,938,424.65, and a $2.8 million preliminary order of forfeiture
- Lawrence Ogunsanwo, 33, to 40 months in federal prison, followed by one year of supervised release, and restitution of $5,648,816.23
- Lakeisha Parker, 33, of Baltimore, to 36 months in federal prison, followed by three years supervised release, and restitution of $8,306,930.95
- Martin Ogisi, 37, of Severn, Maryland, to 33 months in federal prison, followed by one year of supervised release, restitution of $11,077,044.17; and a $500,000 forfeiture order
- Kevin Colon, 34, of Curtis Bay, Maryland, to 27 months in federal prison, followed by two years of supervised release, restitution of $2,515,159.63, and a $214,518.42 forfeiture order
- Areal Harris, 27, of Hanover, Maryland, to 24 months in federal prison, followed by one year of supervised release, and restitution of $3,159,482.83
- Emily Gil Arias, 29, of Silver Spring, Maryland to 24 months in federal prison, followed by one year of supervised release, and restitution of 2,102,919.27
- Lorena Perez Herrera, 29, of Washington, DC, to 24 months in federal prison, followed by one year of supervised release, and restitution of $1,473,125.58
- Blondel Ndjouandjouaka, 31, of Silver Spring, Maryland, to 24 months in federal prison, followed by one year of supervised release, restitution of $733,941.48, and a $757,562.63 forfeiture order.
Now, Boiro will spend the next two years in prison.
Maryland
Justice Department sues Maryland over immigration policies
(Photo by Celal Gunes/Anadolu via Getty Images)
WASHINGTON – The Department of Justice is suing Maryland and State Attorney General Anthony Brown, alleging the state’s “sanctuary” policies hinder the enforcement of federal immigration laws.
The lawsuit claims that Maryland’s sanctuary policies are illegal under federal law and that the state’s “refusal to cooperate with federal immigration authorities” has had negative consequences for immigration law enforcement officials.
What we know:
According to the lawsuit, the state’s refusal to cooperate has led to facilities refusing to help transfer immigrants to federal custody.
Under the direction of Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, the DOJ’s Civil Division will identify state and local laws, policies and practices that violate federal laws or impede federal operations.
“When sanctuary jurisdictions enact laws to shield [undocumented immigrants] from federal law enforcement, it is not merely federal law that is violated, but the voices of everyday American voters silenced,” said Associate Attorney General Stanley Woodward.
The lawsuit cites Maryland’s Community Trust Act, a law that went into effect in May, which prevents local law enforcement from holding an individual without a warrant on behalf of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). There is an exception for those who commit felonies or sex offenses.
What they’re saying:
The Community Trust Act law sparked pushback from local law enforcement leaders across the state, with 17 of Maryland’s 24 sheriffs suing, and saying the law “undermines public safety and restricts cooperation” between local and federal officials.
“Such blatant disregard for federal laws that have been on the books for decades is not merely a political disagreement or passive abstention; it is deliberate, disruptive action that jeopardizes the public safety for all Americans,” the DOJ lawsuit reads. “The Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution prohibits a state from obstructing Congress and the Executive in this manner.”
The Source: This information is from a Department of Justice lawsuit.
-
Politics4 minutes ago
Trump administration clears path for controversial Mojave Desert water pipeline
-
Sports11 minutes agoWorld Cup fans flock to In-N-Out, Erewhon and Trader Joe’s for a taste of California
-
World21 minutes agoHundreds of thousands evacuated as Typhoon Bavi barrels towards China
-
News49 minutes ago
With the white nationalist group Patriot Front, what you see is not what you get
-
New York2 hours agoHow ‘The Wire’ Star Jamie Hector Spends a Hot Day in Brooklyn
-
Los Angeles, Ca2 hours agoBurglars ransack Sherman Oaks condo building during fumigation
-
Detroit, MI2 hours agoMetro Detroit weather forecast, July 10, 2026 — 11 p.m. Update
-
San Francisco, CA3 hours agoClassical music series helps reconnect downtown San Francisco community