Connect with us

Louisiana

Supreme Court Knocks Down Texas And Lousiana Attempt To Sue Biden Administration Over Immigration

Published

on

Supreme Court Knocks Down Texas And Lousiana Attempt To Sue Biden Administration Over Immigration


Topline

Texas and Louisiana do not have standing to sue the Biden Administration over an immigration deportation policy, the Supreme Court ruled Friday, delivering a win to the Biden Administration in an 8-1 ruling—though the court cautioned that doesn’t mean the White House couldn’t be sued in future cases.

Key Facts

U.S. v. Texas concerns Texas’ and Louisiana’s legal challenge against a Biden immigration policy, outlined in a September 2021 memo, that prioritized some undocumented immigrants for deportation over others, noting the administration “do[es] not have the resources to apprehend and seek the removal of every one of these noncitizens.”

Advertisement

The Supreme Court ruled Texas and Louisiana did not have standing to challenge that policy, reinstating the Biden Administration’s directive after a lower court struck it down.

Texas and Louisiana argued the Biden Administration’s directive violated other federal laws that would require them to arrest more undocumented immigrants than the 2021 memo, which prioritizes immigrants who pose a terrorism threat or other threat to public safety.

Advertisement

The lawsuit violated court precedent that says people lack standing to bring lawsuits against a “prosecuting authority when he himself is neither prosecuted nor threatened with prosecution,” the court ruled.

The court’s ruling in this case doesn’t mean “that federal courts may never entertain cases involving the Executive Branch’s alleged failure to make more arrests or bring more prosecutions,” Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote in the court’s opinion, noting there are other situations in which it’s possible plaintiffs would have standing, and that there might be more of a case challenging policies around detaining undocumented immigrants who have been arrested, rather than arresting and prosecuting them in the first place.

Crucial Quote

“To be clear, our … decision today should in no way be read to suggest or imply that the Executive possesses some freestanding or general constitutional authority to disregard statutes requiring or prohibiting executive action,” Kavanaugh wrote, calling Texas and Louisiana’s case “extraordinarily unusual” and saying the court’s decision is “narrow and simply maintains the longstanding jurisprudential status quo.”

Chief Critic

Justice Samuel Alito was the only justice to vote in the conservative states’ favor, writing in his dissent that the court’s ruling “brushes aside a major precedent that directly controls the standing question, refuses to apply our established test for standing, disregards factual findings made by the District Court after a trial, and holds that the only limit on the power of a President to disobey a law like the important provision at issue is Congress’s power to employ the weapons of inter-branch warfare.” “I would not blaze this unfortunate trail,” Alito wrote, arguing “settled law … leads ineluctably to the conclusion that Texas has standing.”

Advertisement

Key Background

The Biden Administration directive at the heart of the case argues that someone not being a documented immigrant “should not alone be the basis of an enforcement action against them,” arguing “the majority of undocumented noncitizens who could be subject to removal have been contributing members of our communities for years.” The memo states the administration will prioritize undocumented immigrants who pose threats to national security by being suspected of terrorism or espionage; have a history of “serious criminal conduct” that makes them a threat to public safety or pose a threat to border security, if they were apprehended at the border or port of entry. Texas and Louisiana’s lawsuit is part of a broader effort by conservative-led states to oppose the Biden Administration’s immigration policies, and the states previously won in district court, where a Trump-appointed judge halted the immigration directive in June 2022. That ruling was then upheld in the conservative-leaning Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. Before the Supreme Court’s decision on Friday, the court had previously ruled in the states’ favor, ruling 5-4 in July 2022 to leave the lower court ruling that blocked the policy in place until it could issue its final opinion in the case.

Further Reading

In U.S. v. Texas, broad questions over immigration enforcement and states’ ability to challenge federal policies (SCOTUSblog)

A federal judge in Texas blocks a major DHS policy limiting immigration enforcement (NPR)



Source link

Advertisement

Louisiana

Panel OKs Louisiana LNG terminal | Arkansas Democrat Gazette

Published

on

Panel OKs Louisiana LNG terminal | Arkansas Democrat Gazette


NEW ORLEANS — What would be the nation’s largest export terminal for liquefied natural gas won approval from a federal commission Thursday, although when the Louisiana project will be completed remains unclear in light of a Biden administration delay announced this year on such projects.

Venture Global’s Calcasieu Pass 2 southwestern Louisiana project, often referred to as CP2, was approved with little discussion by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission during a livestreamed meeting. However, the project, which would be Venture Global’s second such facility in the area, still needs Department of Energy approval, and its immediate prospects are uncertain, given the administration’s January pause.

That pause aligned President Joe Biden with environmentalists who fear the huge increase in exports, in the form of liquefied natural gas, or LNG, is locking in potentially catastrophic planet-warming emissions.

Louisiana’s two Republican U.S. senators, officials from other energy producing states and industry officials have derided the pause as shortsighted and a boon to U.S. adversaries that produce energy, including Iran and Russia. But, some residents and environmentalists in the state — dependent on oil and gas dollars but also vulnerable to the effects of climate change — are wary of more LNG development.

Advertisement

Venture Global issued a statement praising the regulatory commission’s approval. “This project will be critical to global energy security and supporting the energy transition, as well as provide jobs and economic growth across Louisiana and the United States,” said Mike Sabel, CEO of Venture Global LNG.

The commission’s approval brings new pressure on Biden from environmentalists.

“The temporary pause on LNG export permitting was a good first step; now President Biden must make the pause permanent and do whatever is necessary to clamp down on fossil fuels throughout the country,” the group Food & Water Watch said in an emailed statement critical of the regulatory commission’s decision.

“New LNG export terminals are simply not compatible with a healthy, livable future,” said a statement from the environmental group Evergreen Action.

Outgoing Federal Energy Regulatory Commission member Allison Clements spoke against the projects Thursday morning. “These projects will have enormous emissions of greenhouse gases, equivalent to putting more than 1.8 million new gas-fueled cars on the road each year. The order does not meaningfully assess those emissions,” Clements said.

Advertisement

Commission Chair Willie Phillips said after the meeting that the commission had to maintain “a delicate balance” between the environmental concerns of communities and following the law governing project approval.

“When matters are complete, when our review is final, we give those matters a vote. And this matter is consistent with the standard that we’ve set for every other project,” Phillips said when asked about critics’ claims that the commission gave “rubber stamp” approval to the project.

He said the commission’s actions, in requiring about 130 conditions on the CP2 project, go “above and beyond” what the panel is required to do under the National Environmental Policy Act, a bedrock environmental law that requires extensive study and public input before major environmental projects can be approved.

Information for this article was contributed by Matthew Daly of The Associated Press.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Louisiana

Pros and cons of Sacramento Kings signing Isaiah Crawford of Louisiana Tech basketball in 2024 NBA draft

Published

on

Pros and cons of Sacramento Kings signing Isaiah Crawford of Louisiana Tech basketball in 2024 NBA draft


Louisiana Tech basketball has another player in the NBA.

The Bulldogs’ Isaiah Crawford was signed by the Sacramento Kings as an undrafted free agent following the NBA draft.

Crawford leaves Ruston as one of the most decorated players in recent program history, and could contribute to the Kings — if he can stay healthy.

Advertisement

What Isaiah Crawford brings to the 2024 NBA Draft

Crawford has been known throughout his career for his defense. It peaked during his final season in 2023-24, when he averaged 2.1 steals and 1.7 blocks per game on his way to being named Conference USA’s Defensive Player of the Year.

He’s not too shabby on offense either, with his scoring average going up every year of his college career except for 2021-22, when he was limited to just three games.

More Louisiana Tech Sports: Former Lady Techster Monica Maxwell incited by Leon Barmore to do great things

More Louisiana Tech Sports: Louisiana Tech 2024 defense to be bolstered by LSU transfer

Isaiah Crawford’s concerns in 2024 NBA Draft

However, Crawford has also had trouble staying on the court. In January 2020, he tore his ACL midway through his freshman season, missing the rest of the year while recovering.

Advertisement

Then, Crawford’s redshirt sophomore season came to an end in November 2021, when he tore his ACL in the same knee. It’s reasonable for the Kings to take things slower than they usually would given Crawford’s history.



Source link

Continue Reading

Louisiana

Texas vs. Louisiana Monroe Week 4 Preview: Keys to the Game

Published

on

Texas vs. Louisiana Monroe Week 4 Preview: Keys to the Game


For the first time in two years and the third time overall, Texas will face Louisiana Monroe in what could be another day at practice for the Longhorns if the Warhawks admit their defeat from the get-go.

Texas powered over ULM in both of their previous meetings, having an advantage of nearly 40 points in both games. The Longhorns stand as one of the most difficult opponents for the Warhawks, as the ULM football schedule ranks fourth from last in college football toughness, while Texas ranks within the top three.

However, a spotlight for ULM has been put on its new head coach Bryant Vincent, and the talent he newly signed back in February. Vincent carries vast coaching experience in offense, and his expertise will be necessary in order for the Warhawks to see a higher-scoring game this time around.

This year will mark Vincent’s debut for the team and his first time in Austin, where the intimidating atmosphere of Darell K. Royal Stadium awaits. But with returning rushing yards leader Hunter Smith in his rotation, who is familiar with the environment after playing against Texas in 2022, Vincent won’t be left completely in the dark.

Advertisement

Texas is looking to be the obvious favorite for this matchup, but anything can happen in college football. Here are the keys for each team in order to secure a win in week 4.

…it shows up.

The Longhorns are overqualified for the job at hand, but that should be even more of a reason to go in for another dominating win rather than take it as an excuse to be sloppy and relaxed on the field. Head coach Steve Sarkisian shouldn’t automatically see the Warhawks as an “easy” opponent and should take this opportunity to show what his team is capable of in all areas of the game.

Another home-field advantage for Texas will also be helpful in making sure that the Longhorns stay in their element and stay focused, so fans should still show up and make the stadium loud and proud.

…fate intervenes for the Warhawks.

Advertisement

ULM is going to have to rebuild with the introduction of Vincent at the helm, and it could take years for the Warhawks to make an impression in the college football world. Heavy preparation will be necessary just to go up against Texas alone, and it’s unlikely that Vincent will turn around his program in just a few months.

But a win for the Warhawks is still possible if they put their best players on the field, such as Smith, Carl Glass Jr., and potential quarterback Hunter Herring. Texas would also have to make some notable errors on both offense and defense for ULM to get the lead or the win.

A victory for ULM would be historic in all aspects, while a loss for Texas would leave a devastating situation for a top tier team.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending