Connect with us

San Diego, CA

Opinion: City needs to have coherent rules on ‘transit-oriented’ projects

Published

on

Opinion: City needs to have coherent rules on ‘transit-oriented’ projects


On March 7, 2023, as part of Mayor Todd Gloria’s 2022 Land Development Code Update, five San Diego City Council members voted to adopt the “Sustainable Development Area” (SDA) to apply to local San Diego zoning programs, including the Bonus ADU Program and Complete Communities. The council’s declaration that housing built up to a full mile from transit is “transit-oriented development” is unique to San Diego and unsupported by any academic or professional research.

Before the creation of the Sustainable Development Area, the city used Transit Priority Areas (TPAs) to define transit-oriented development. Transit Priority Areas were mapped as one-half mile from major transit stops “as the crow flies.” This measurement was always problematic because it didn’t consider natural or manmade barriers, including canyons and freeways, and resulted in real-world walking distances up to three miles from transit stops.

In 2022, the Planning Department finally acknowledged this absurdity and invented the Sustainable Development Area, which is one-mile walking distance from existing or planned transit, and declared this a reasonable walking distance for transit-oriented development (TOD). But the real motive for substituting the one-mile distance is not to increase transit use — which it doesn’t — but to preserve and even increase the area eligible for the Bonus ADU Program.

Neighbors For A Better San Diego shared research with our elected officials confirming that truly “walkable” transit is located no more than one-half mile unimpeded from a major transit stop.

Advertisement

We presented SANDAG data showing that 92% of San Diegans who use public transit walk a half-mile or less to a transit stop. We also proved that San Diego would be ineligible for most transit-oriented development grants, which limit walking distance to transit to one-half mile. Still, the City Council embraced the discredited definition of “transit-friendly” as being a full mile from a transit stop.

The city is two years into its blind commitment to the “Sustainable Development Area.” Roughly half of permitted Bonus ADU projects are located more than a half-mile from transit, which makes their residents vehicle dependent.

And this one-mile-from-transit SDA policy is totally at odds with state and local definitions of transit-oriented development.

For example, California ADU Code 66322 prohibits local entities from requiring parking for tenants “where the accessory dwelling unit is located within one-half mile walking distance of public transit.” Clearly this establishes that the state considers one-half mile walking distance the appropriate measure of transit-oriented development.

To be eligible for California’s Transit-Oriented Housing Development Program, a project must be “within one-half mile from a Qualifying Transit Station… along a walkable route. The walkable route… shall be free of negative environmental conditions that deter pedestrian circulation, such as barriers; stretches without sidewalks or walking paths; noisy vehicular tunnels; streets, arterials or highways without regulated crossings that facilitate pedestrian movement; stretches without shade or cover; or stretches without lighted streets.”

Advertisement

In addition, San Diego adopted the following definition for transit access in its 2022 Transportation Study Manual:

“Access to transit is defined as transit being located within a reasonable walking distance (½ mile) from the project driveway.”

Finally, San Diego’s Draft 2024 Edition Street Design Manual defines Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) as 2,000 feet (0.38 miles) from transit:

“A mixed-used [sic] community within a typical 2,000-foot (600 m) walking distance of a transit stop and core commercial area. The design, configuration, and mix of uses emphasize a pedestrian-oriented environment and reinforce the use of public transportation without ignoring the role of the automobile.”

San Diego’s Transportation Study and Street Design Manuals concur that transit-oriented development is one-half mile or less from transit. This undermines the Planning Department’s unsupported contention that one-mile walking distance from existing or planned transit qualifies as transit-oriented development.

Advertisement

That’s why the bogus “Sustainable Development Area” should be deleted from San Diego Municipal Code. Instead, the “Transit Priority Area” should be updated to one-half mile walking distance from existing transit as the appropriate measure of transit-oriented development, consistent with city of San Diego, California, national and international standards, and plain old common sense!

Givot is vice chair of Neighbors For A Better San Diego and lives in El Cerrito.



Source link

Advertisement

San Diego, CA

Letters: A selective immigration policy ultimately fails us all

Published

on

Letters: A selective immigration policy ultimately fails us all


How interesting that Donald Trump is deporting Brown people who pay taxes and contribute to our economy (though they will never reap any benefits from those taxes) and instead is using our tax money to import and set up South Africans (none of whom are anything but White) who have never contributed to our economy. Could skin color perhaps have something to do with this policy?

— Nita Herpolsheimer, San Diego



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

San Diego, CA

Did California’s assault weapons ban save lives in San Diego mosque attack?

Published

on

Did California’s assault weapons ban save lives in San Diego mosque attack?


California’s assault weapons ban may have helped limit the ability of two attackers to take lives at the Islamic Center of San Diego last week, according to a prominent gun control organization.

But the executive director of a San Diego gun rights group said the fact the attack even happened is proof the ban failed.

What the two don’t dispute is that the video from the attackers’ livestream shows one of them using a rifle that appears to comply with California’s strict gun laws. While authorities have not confirmed what models of firearms were used in the attack, representatives of the two organizations identified it as a semi-automatic Ruger Mini-14 rifle.

The alleged suspect’s Ruger Mini-14 rifle is seen in this screenshot from a livestream obtained by KPBS of the attack on the Islamic Center of San Diego on May 18, 2026.

KPBS is not publishing the video, which authorities have not released, the names of the two teenage suspects or their writings, where they wrote they were motivated to conduct the attack by a number of sex and race-related grievances. They wore emblems associated with white supremacists and neo-Nazis and lashed out in their writings against women, Jewish people, Muslims and LGBTQ+ people.

Advertisement

They wrote they were inspired by the 2019 attack on two mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand, that killed 51 Muslims. In their writings, the suspects said they wanted to replicate the Christchurch attack in San Diego.

The attack in Christchurch prompted New Zealand to change its gun laws.

Semiautomatic rifles sold in California have to meet certain criteria that other states don’t require.

The barrels must be at least 30 inches long and may not have collapsible or folding stocks. They cannot have a pistol grip behind the trigger, nor one attached at the forward part of the rifle.

And they cannot have a magazine that holds more than 10 rounds.

Advertisement

“From everything I saw from the video, (the rifle) looked like it met those criteria and looked like a very stock firearm that you could purchase at many dealers here in California,” said Steve Lindley, a policy advisor for the Brady Campaign.

Lindley spent almost 30 years in law enforcement, according to his biography. He worked for the National City Police Department and spent eight years leading the Bureau of Firearms at the California Department of Justice.

Lindley said features such as pistol grips make rifles more lethal.

“Over time it makes it easier for the shooter to have the firearm to their shoulder and in their hands,” he said. “Less fatigue, and it lines up a little bit better with your eyesight. The capacity of the magazines and other features on the firearm make it more accurate and easier to use in close quarters.”

The video shows the body cam operator firing the Mini-14 until it appears to jam. He struggles to clear the chamber and appears to remove and reinsert the magazine. He works the bolt, apparently unable to chamber a new round.

Advertisement

As the video continues, he continues to struggle with the bolt of the rifle before giving up, drawing a handgun and stepping outside.

The attackers never made it beyond the lobby, where about 100 schoolchildren and staff were inside the center. Authorities say they were delayed by the three men killed in the attack: Mansour Kaziha, 78, Nadir Awad, 57, and armed security guard Amin Abdullah.

From left to right, Mansour Kaziha, Amin Abdullah and Nadir Awad.

The Islamic Center of San Diego

Undated photos of (left to right) Mansour Kaziha, Amin Abdullah and Nadir Awad.

“Looking at the reality of this, a good guy with a gun stopped a bad guy with a gun from killing a lot of kids. Full stop,” said Michael Schwartz, the executive director of the San Diego County Gun Owners PAC.

Advertisement

“The assault weapons ban that California has implemented clearly failed — it didn’t stop these two people,” he said.

Schwartz described the features banned by California as “cosmetic” and that the semi-automatic rifles function the same regardless of their stock, grips or magazine size.

“The idea that … the (high-capacity) magazine ban stopped them from getting a high-capacity magazine … there just isn’t any evidence or proof,” he said.

While high-capacity magazines can’t be bought or sold in California, Schwartz said anyone can travel to the next state over and buy as many as they want.

Although the Mini-14 used in the attack is capable of accepting 30 or 40-round magazines, said Lindley, the shooters appeared to only have a California-compliant 10-round magazine.

Advertisement

“If you have ten round magazines, you have ten rounds to shoot before you need to change magazines,” he said. “If you have a 30- or 40-round magazine, you can shoot 30 or 40 rounds before you need to reload.”

That’s important, Lindley said, because when shooters stop to reload, it gives victims time to either escape or attempt to subdue the attacker.

Schwartz said that didn’t affect the Islamic center attack.

“If he had a bigger magazine or he had a pistol grip or whatever, it wouldn’t have changed the outcome of this at all,” he said.

Lindley played a part in crafting more than 100 gun bills, according to the Brady Campaign. He said with so many guns in the United States, authorities can’t stop shootings — all they can do is try to limit the damage.

Advertisement

“We can prevent a lot of victimology by lowering the capacity of the magazines,” he said.



Source link

Continue Reading

San Diego, CA

Alleged San Diego Gunman Had Violent Obsessions

Published

on

Alleged San Diego Gunman Had Violent Obsessions



Police were so unsettled by one of the teens later accused in the deadly shooting at the Islamic Center of San Diego that they took his guns away more than a year before the attack. Court records show Chula Vista police secured a gun violence restraining order against then-high school student Caleb Vazquez in January 2025 after classmates and staff reported he idolized mass shooters, talked about a “day of retribution,” and came to school dressed as mass murderers and the TV serial killer Dexter, per NBC News and KGTV. The school had shared social media posts in which Vazquez praised killers, including those behind a 2011 attack in Norway and a 2019 shooting at a Walmart in El Paso, Texas, NBC reports.


Vazquez allegedly admitted an infatuation with mass killings and an idolization of Adolf Hitler and was put on a 72-hour psychiatric hold. His father—initially uncooperative, according to a police affidavit—removed 26 weapons from the home and arranged for therapy before the restraining order was dismissed that March. Just over a year later, police say Vazquez, 18, and a 17-year-old he’d met online killed three people at the mosque—security guard Amin Abdullah, caretaker Mansour Kaziha, and neighbor Nadir Awad—before wounding a landscaper and dying by suicide. FBI officials say writings left behind were steeped in extremist hatred. In the aftermath, community members are questioning how so many warnings failed to prevent the attack and calling for stronger, earlier interventions on mental health and homicidal ideation.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending