Connect with us

South

Fox News Accuses Dominion of Destroying Messages of ‘Senior Executives,’ Seeks Sanctions Dismissing Multi-Billion Dollar Suit

Published

on

Fox News Accuses Dominion of Destroying Messages of ‘Senior Executives,’ Seeks Sanctions Dismissing Multi-Billion Dollar Suit


Dominion CEO John Poulos

Fox Information accused Dominion Voting Techniques of getting destroyed or deleted messages from a few of its highest rating executives. Their sanctions movement asks a choose to torpedo the multi-billion greenback lawsuit.

Courtroom papers reviewed by Regulation&Crime are skinny on particulars concerning the community’s allegations, besides that the discover of movement for sanctions alleges spoliation of the digital messages of senior executives [John] Poulos, [Waldeep] Singh, and [Kay] Stinson.”

Poulos is Dominion’s CEO, who as lately as Sunday appeared on 60 Minutes with Anderson Cooper. Singh is its government vice chairman of gross sales, and Stinson is its vice chairman for presidency affairs.

Advertisement

The doctrine of spoliation usually refers to “the destruction, concealment or the failure to protect proof by one get together that’s related to a declare and hampers the opposite get together’s capability to advance its place.” If a celebration is discovered to have acted in such a way, the court docket can impose sanctions towards that get together and even dismiss the criticism.

The community’s attorneys additionally filed a Proposed Order that may grant their movement for sanctions towards Dominion and presumably present a collection of different potential cures within the community’s favor, together with an order tossing the lawsuit altogether.

If the criticism is just not dismissed, Fox is looking for to have the jury instructed that it “should presume the messages contained info unfavorable to Plaintiffs concerning the defamatory nature of [Fox News Network]’s protection of the President’s allegations and concerning the safety of Plaintiffs’ machines and knowledge undermining Plaintiffs’ damages calculation.”

The community additionally requested that Dominion “be required to show falsity and each basic and particular damages by clear and convincing proof no matter whether or not Plaintiffs show defamation per se.”

The crux of Dominion’s $1.6 billion lawsuit towards the conservative information community is that Fox knowingly lied to its viewers concerning the veracity of election fraud and election rigging claims in the course of the 2020 presidential election, partially to cease viewers from flocking to networks additional to the proper.

Advertisement

“After the November 3, 2020 Presidential Election, viewers started fleeing Fox in favor of media retailers endorsing the lie that large fraud brought on President Trump to lose the election,” the lawsuit states. “They noticed Fox as insufficiently supportive of President [Donald] Trump, together with as a result of Fox was the primary community to declare that President Trump misplaced Arizona. So Fox got down to lure viewers again — together with President Trump himself — by deliberately and falsely blaming Dominion for President Trump’s loss by rigging the election.”

Poulos, Dominion’s head government, appeared on 60 Minutes and continued to assert that Fox Information was conscious that the allegations towards the corporate had been false, however that such information didn’t cease them from airing them anyway.

“We instructed them. We instructed them in actual time. Others instructed them,” Poulos stated in the course of the interview. “Authorities officers instructed them. Nonpartisan authorities officers instructed ’em. Folks contained in the Trump administration instructed them. Um, native election officers on each side of the aisle instructed ’em. This isn’t a matter of not understanding the reality. They knew the reality,”

Dominion final week filed its personal confidential movement concerning the court docket’s ruling on the corporate’s movement to compel testimony from Fox Information character Jeanine Pirro.

As beforehand reported by Regulation&Crime, Dominion claims that it obtained proof exposing Pirro’s key position within the case by discovery, the evidence-sharing section of proceedings that started months in the past. The corporate claims that Fox Information lastly produced a few of it on the eleventh hour earlier than Pirro was scheduled to take the new seat.

Advertisement

“13 hours earlier than her deposition, and a number of other months since first requesting her deposition, Fox Information produced a number of texts from Ms. Pirro,” the partially sealed public model of the submitting states, adopted by a number of traces of redactions.

Dominion alleges that these messages give context to Pirro’s interview with conspiracy theorist and lawyer Sidney Powell on her present on Nov. 14, 2020, in a phase that she promoted on Twitter. The tweet concerning the interview referred to “intense focus” on “allegations of voter fraud,” with out noting that such claims had been unsupported.

The confidential submitting from final week is docketed as “Dominion’s exception to the Particular Grasp’s order granting partially and denying partially Dominion’s movement to compel Ms. Pirro’s testimony concerning related texts.”

Dominion’s lawyer Brian E. Farnan and Fox’s lawyer Katharine Lester Mowery didn’t instantly reply to a messages from Regulation&Crime.

Advertisement

[image via YouTube screengrab]

Have a tip we should always know? [email protected]





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Dallas, TX

Dallas-based Energy Transfer’s $300 million trial against Greenpeace begins today

Published

on

Dallas-based Energy Transfer’s 0 million trial against Greenpeace begins today


After nearly eight years, Dallas-based pipeline company Energy Transfer LP’s $300 million trial against Greenpeace USA is set to begin Monday in North Dakota.

Energy Transfer is accusing the longtime nonprofit and other activists of defamation and damages over claims related to protests surrounding the construction of the nearly 1,200-mile Dakota Access Pipeline in 2016.

Before the trial, Mi Barrio 214, a Pleasant Grove art studio, became the gathering place last week for local and national activists, tribal members, artists and community leaders to create climate justice banners and signs against Energy Transfer.

A Dallas energy company’s lawsuit could bankrupt Greenpeace’s U.S. operations

Breaking News

Advertisement

Get the latest breaking news from North Texas and beyond.

On Saturday, a peaceful march took place on the Ronald Kirk pedestrian bridge with wings representing hummingbirds and banners that read “We will not be silenced” and “End big oil’s attack on free speech,” with about 35 people.

The protests in 2016 and 2017, which erupted because pipeline construction endangered sacred lands and threatened the area’s water supply, were organized by Standing Rock and other Sioux tribes and supported by more than 300 sovereign tribal nations. They inspired an international solidarity movement after Energy Transfer’s private security unleashed attack dogs and pepper spray on nonviolent protesters.

Greenpeace activists and supporters gather for a rally as part of their preparation for Monday’s trial against Greenpeace US for opposing the construction of the nearly mile-long Dakota Access Pipeline, on Saturday, Feb. 22, 2025, at Ronald Kirk pedestrian bridge in Dallas, (Shafkat Anowar / Staff Photographer)

Joseph White Eyes, who grew up in Eagle Butte on the Cheyenne River Sioux Reservation and participated in the 2016 protests, came to Dallas for the march to send a message to Energy Transfer. White Eyes said Greenpeace was not the organizer of the protests; it was an indigenous-led movement.

“To take that narrative away for that Indigenous people that were able to stand up and do this type of resistance like we’ve done, for the past 100 years, is a complete slap in our face,” White Eyes told The Dallas Morning News. “Because then again, it goes to show that people of color are on the sidelines, and it’s these big white organizations that are in charge.”

Advertisement

Energy Transfer, led by North Texas billionaire Kelcy Warren, said Greenpeace and others incited protests, spread misinformation, and vandalized the project, which, according to the lawsuit, cost Energy Transfer millions of dollars in delays.

The company stated via email, “Our lawsuit against Greenpeace is about them not following the law. It is not about free speech as they are trying to claim. We support the rights of all Americans to express their opinions and lawfully protest. However, when it is not done in accordance with our laws, we have a legal system to deal with that. Beyond that, we will let our case speak for itself.”

More than 400 organizations worldwide signed an open letter denouncing the lawsuit as meritless and an attempt to rewrite history by claiming that Greenpeace orchestrated what was an Indigenous-led movement.

Texas Governor Greg Abbott (left) receives a first bump from Kelcy Warren, CEO of Energy...
Texas Governor Greg Abbott (left) receives a first bump from Kelcy Warren, CEO of Energy Transfer Partners, as the two participated in a fireside chat about Texas’ growing economy at the Dallas Citizens Council 2024 Annual Meeting in the Hilton Anatole in Dallas, December 12, 2024. The chat was moderated by DCC immediate past chairman Rob Walters.(Tom Fox / Staff Photographer)

Greenpeace has denounced the lawsuit as a “Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation” case. SLAPP suits are civil litigation that individuals and entities bring to dissuade their critics from continuing to produce negative publicity. According to Cornell Law School, by definition, SLAPP suits do not have any true legal claims against the critics.

The Obama administration halted construction in 2016, but the project resumed following an executive order in the early days President Donald Trump’s first term. The pipeline was completed soon after and began operating commercially in June 2017.

Warren and his wife are major political donors. Politico’s E&E News reported the pair have donated upward of $30 million since 2010, primarily to Republican candidates. Warren donated about $5 million to Trump’s 2024 campaign.

Advertisement
North Texas Native Americans want their voices heard ahead of 2024 presidential election

Rogelio Meixueiro, a North Texas activist and Greenpeace organizer, said Dallas residents need to know the connection between this lawsuit and their city.

“A lot of the big oil industry deals take place in Dallas, and this is where the headquarters of Energy Transfer is, and Warren lives here,” Meixueiro said. “In the community, he is seen as a great philanthropist and someone who supports many causes, but he has also put the land and water of some communities at risk.”

Warren paid $10 million to name the 5.2-acre park Klyde Warren Park in honor of his son, The News reported.

Energy Transfer is represented by Gibson Dunn & Crutcher – the firm that represented Chevron against Steven Donziger, an environmental advocate sued by the firm after helping Amazonian communities in Ecuador win a landmark pollution case. Davis Wright Tremaine, a firm known for representing First Amendment cases, represents Greenpeace.

The five-week jury trial in Mandan, North Dakota, will not be streamed live.

Advertisement

Phoenix Amaterasu was one of the about 30 community members who were at the Mi Barrio 214 studio to connect with others who were there to support the cause.

Amaterasu traveled from Austin and others from D.C., Chicago, California, Seattle and North Dakota.

“They can try to silence people and nature, but we will persevere no matter what,” said Amaterasu, spraying green and blue paint on the cardboard hummingbird wings. “We have to protect our nature. That is our duty. We are done with the big oil industry.”





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Miami, FL

Man attempts to kidnap woman outside hospital before trying to kidnap teen in South Miami, police say

Published

on

Man attempts to kidnap woman outside hospital before trying to kidnap teen in South Miami, police say


SOUTH MIAMI, Fla. – The same man who tried to kidnap a 16-year-old girl last week in South Miami had attempted to kidnap a 38-year-old woman about 35 minutes before nearby.

According to Sgt. Fernando Bosch, a South Miami Police Department spokesman, surveillance video shows Brian Gamboa attacking a woman at 10:50 p.m., on Wednesday.

The woman was outside South Miami Hospital where there were security guards, police said.

“She ran to an office where the doctor came out and he got spooked and he left,” Bosch said.

Advertisement

After his kidnapping attempt failed, Bosch said Gamboa drove to the Sunset Tavern where he was involved in a hit-and-run crash in the parking lot while driving with a suspended license.

“He tries to park his car, hits another car, and flees the scene,” Bosch said.

Gamboa then went on to try to abduct the teenage girl who fought back at 11:15 p.m., on Wednesday, along Southwest 86 Street, near 62 Avenue, in South Miami, police said.

“I was on the phone with my friends walking and then a car pulled up, 10 feet in front of me, and then some guy came out and tried to grab me,” the victim, who suffered cuts, and bruises, told Local 10 News.

According to the arrest report, the teenage girl reported Gamboa reeked of alcohol. Bosch said several witnesses did not intervene or call police.

Advertisement

Gamboa, who is from the Brox, New York, is facing two counts of kidnapping and two counts of battery. His next hearing is Friday.

Copyright 2025 by WPLG Local10.com – All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

Atlanta, GA

Delta flight forced to return to Atlanta airport Monday morning because of 'haze'

Published

on

Delta flight forced to return to Atlanta airport Monday morning because of 'haze'


Photos courtesy of Kevin McKinney

Delta Air Lines has faced a series of unsettling incidents recently, including smoke or haze in the cabin on two flights and a separate crash that injured more than 20 people.

Advertisement

What we know:

Delta Flight 876 was forced to return to Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport on Monday morning because of “haze” inside the aircraft.

According to Delta, the flight crew followed procedures, declared an emergency for priority handling from air traffic control, and returned to Atlanta after the haze was observed.

Advertisement

Upon landing on Runway 27, emergency slides were deployed for egress.

The Boeing 717, which departed Atlanta for Columbia, South Carolina, at approximately 8:30 a.m., was carrying 94 customers, two pilots, and three flight attendants. Delta teams arranged ground transportation and rebooking for passengers.

According to the registry information for the aircraft involved, the Boeing 717 was declared airworthy on Sept. 16, 1999.

Advertisement

The backstory:

There have been two other recent incidents involving Delta flights. 

Advertisement

On Saturday night, Delta Flight DL43 departed Los Angeles bound for Sydney, Australia.

Delta flight diverted back to LAX after smoke detected in galley

Smoke was detected in the galley of the Airbus A350-900, forcing the flight to return to the airport. The aircraft landed safely and proceeded to an arrival gate. There were 162 passengers on the flight. 

Advertisement

Additionally, a Delta flight operated by Endeavor Air crashed and landed upside down at Toronto Pearson Airport last week after departing from Minneapolis-St. Paul Airport.

Delta releases new information about captain, first officer flying plane that crashed in Toronto

Advertisement

No fatalities were reported, but more than 20 people were injured, including three critically injured passengers.

What they’re saying:

A Delta spokesperson explained the actions taken on Monday morning’s Flight 876:

Advertisement

“The flight crew followed procedures to return to Atlanta when a haze inside the aircraft was observed after departure. Nothing is more important than the safety of our customers and people, and we apologize to our customers for the experience.”

The FAA sent the following to FOX 5 Atlanta:

Advertisement

Delta Air Lines Flight 876 returned safely to Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport around 9 a.m. local time on Monday, February 24, after the crew reported possible smoke in the flightdeck. The Boeing 717-200 was headed to Columbia Metropolitan Airport in South Carolina. The FAA will investigate.

Why you should care:

These incidents have raised fresh concerns about safety protocols as Delta Air Lines works to address the challenges and ensure the well-being of its passengers amid these recent events.

Advertisement

AtlantaDeltaNewsInstastories



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending