Connect with us

Delaware

Find out which cities in Delaware have the best, worst life expectancy, according to CDC

Published

on

Find out which cities in Delaware have the best, worst life expectancy, according to CDC


play

Delaware’s average life expectancy is in the middle of the pack when compared with other states around the country, but people in some ZIP codes are expected to live longer or shorter lives than the state average.  

The Center for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Vital Statistics Reports shows that in 2020 – the most recent year state data is available for – Delaware ranked No. 27 for life expectancy in the United States, with an average lifespan of 76.7 years. The lifespan for males and females in Delaware both ranked No. 28, with the former at an average lifespan of 73.9 years and the latter at 79.5 years. 

Advertisement

According to the 2020 data, Hawaii has the highest life expectancy at 80.7 years, while Mississippi has the lowest life expectancy at 71.9 years. In Delaware, some census tracts have a life expectancy well below Mississippi’s average.  

Delaware cities with the best life expectancy  

The CDC’s National Center for Health Statistics created an interactive online map showing the average life expectancy for cities across the U.S. based on cartographic census tract boundaries from 2010 to 2015.

Census tracts for each state are color-coded based on the average life expectancy for its area. Dark red is an average lifespan of 56.9 years to 75.1 years; pink is 75.2 years to 77.5 years; light blue is 77.6 years to 79.6 years; blue is 79.6 years to 81.6 years; and dark blue is 81.7 years to 97.5 years. 

Advertisement

Some of the best life expectancies in each Delaware county are as follows:  

New Castle County 

  • Communities near western Middletown along Route 301, which have an average lifespan of 82.6 years.  
  • Milford Crossroads and communities near Newark, which have an average lifespan of 83.4 and 83.3 years, respectively. 

  • Pike Creek, which has an average lifespan of 82.7 years.  
  • Greenville, with an average lifespan of 86.1 years. The surrounding communities of Centreville, Winterthur, Rockland and Alapocas trail with lifespans ranging from 82.2 years to 84.6 years.  
  • Brandywine Hundred with an average lifespan of 83 years.  

Kent County 

None of the census tracts in Kent County report values in the dark blue category on the CDC’s map. Only three census tracts are recorded in the blue category, which are: 

  • Rodney Village and nearby communities, which have an average lifespan of 79.7 years.  
  • Some communities north of Route 8 and south of Cheswold, which includes the boundaries for Lenape Indian Tribe of Delaware, have an average lifespan of 81.1 years.  
  • Western portions of Dover, west of Route 15, which have an average lifespan of 81.2 years.  

Sussex County 

  • The southern half of Laurel, and areas below the city, which have an average lifespan of 81.8 years.  
  • The area between Broadkill Beach and Lewes, which has an average lifespan of 84.8 years.  
  • Edward H. McCabe Preserve to Route 9, which has an average lifespan of 82.2 years. 
  • The coastal area from Dewey Beach to the Coast Guard Station at Indian River Inlet, which has a lifespan of 84.7 years. 
  • Northeast Millville, Ocean View and areas through Little Assawoman Bay, which have a lifespan of 82.2 years.  

Delaware cities with the worst life expectancy 

Some of the worst life expectancies in each Delaware county are as follows: 

New Castle County 

Advertisement
  • Ogletown, near Christiana Hospital, which has an average lifespan of 74.7 years.  
  • Stanton, which has an average lifespan ranging from 72.8 years to 73.7 years.  
  • Communities in and near Elsmere, which have average lifespans ranging from 74.2 years to 75 years.  
  • Minquadale and communities near New Castle, which have average lifespans ranging from 70.1 years to 74.4 years.  
  • Wilmington, which has an average lifespan ranging from 68.2 years to 74.4 years.  

Kent County 

  • All coastal communities in the county, which are under one census tract, have an average life expectancy of 74.5 years.  
  • Harrington and Felton, which have an average lifespan of 74.7 years.  
  • Viola, Woodside, Camden and Wyoming, which have an average lifespan of 74.9 years. 
  • Some communities in Dover near Route 13 and Route 8, which have average lifespans ranging from 72.5 years to 75 years.  
  • Communities west of Route 10, which have an average lifespan of 72.2 years.  

Sussex County  

Only three categories in the county are in the red category. They are: 

  • The western half of Long Neck and the surrounding area through Route 5, which have an average lifespan of 73.7 years. 
  • Communities southeast of Seaford between Route 9 and Route 13, which have an average lifespan of 74.8 years.  
  • The westernmost portion of Seaford and surrounding areas from Route 18 to just above Phillips Landing Road near Bethel, which have an average lifespan of 74.4 years.  

Got a tip or a story idea? Contact Krys’tal Griffin at kgriffin@delawareonline.com. 



Source link

Delaware

Delmarva’s legal power forces 2 villages to vacate laws banning new electricity towers

Published

on

Delmarva’s legal power forces 2 villages to vacate laws banning new electricity towers


What are journalists missing from the state of Delaware? What would you most like WHYY News to cover? Let us know.

Efforts by two tiny bucolic villages in northern Delaware to thwart Delmarva Power’s plan to replace high-voltage transmission lines have crumbled under a lawsuit filed by the state’s dominant electricity provider.

Ardentown and Ardencroft, whose roughly 500 residents live in a self-proclaimed
“forest ecosystem” of mature woodlands and open spaces known as “greens,” object to the looming replacement of seven tall metal towers, one more than 100 feet high, that were built a century ago on what was then farmland.

The existing towers traverse about a half-mile of mostly hilly terrain through the two towns, with some located between the backyard of homes in a Delmarva right-of-way. Their replacement with galvanized steel structures designed to withstand hurricane-force winds is part of Delmarva’s 4.5-mile upgrade that’s aimed at improving reliability service for 13,000 customers while reducing the frequency and duration of outages.

Advertisement

But the village’s governing assemblies contend the project will tarnish the lush enclave by clear-cutting trees and disrupting lead-contaminated soil beneath the towers. They want the project rerouted about a quarter-mile away, near railroad tracks where Delmarva already has some towers. WHYY News detailed the controversy in January.

The yellow line shows the current stretch of towers and electric cables, and the blue line shows the railroad tracks where Arden leaders want them moved. (Courtesy of Ben Gruswitz)

In a bid to stymie Delmarva, Ardencroft banned new transmission lines and towers last year, and approved an annual impact fee for existing transmission infrastructure. In March, the town sent Delmarva a $12,833.17 impact fee bill for 2025.

Earlier this year, Ardentown formally entered the fray, prohibiting transmission towers and poles from exceeding 100 feet in height, with fines of $1,000 per day for violations. Ardentown also banned new transmission lines or tower infrastructure of 60 kilovolts or more within 100 feet of any home, with fines of $1,500 per day for violations.

Delmarva’s existing lines and towers, both Ardentown ordinances said, have “caused almost 100 years of unnecessary harm and avoidable risk to our village.”

Advertisement

In response to the villages’ laws and fees, Delmarva fired back on Oct. 31 against Ardentown — but not Ardencroft — in Delaware’s Chancery Court, which is recognized internationally for its ability to resolve business and corporate disputes.

Delmarva’s suit asked the court to invalidate Ardentown’s new laws and order the town to pay its legal bills. The 27-page filing accused the town of exceeding its legislative authority by violating the village’s 1926 contract with predecessor American Power Company that allows the lines, the Delaware Public Service Commission’s authority to regulate utilities and Delmarva’s constitutional property rights.

“The 1926 Ardentown Easement does not limit the height of the towers/poles located in the Ardentown Easement Area, nor does it limit the voltage carried by the transmission lines,” the lawsuit said.

three photos of transmission towers
The century-old transmission towers Delmarva Power wants to replace are up to 95 feet high, and a weathered “danger” sign warning of “high voltage” is attached to a century-old transmission tower. (Cris Barrish/WHYY)

The lawsuit added that the easement “gives Delmarva Power, among other things, the right to ‘repair and renew said poles, towers, structures, fixtures, and wires.’”

None of the current towers are higher than 100 feet, according to the lawsuit, but all of the proposed ones are, and the law was only enacted after Delmarva shared details of its “long-planned improvements” with town leaders.

Advertisement

“At their core, the ordinances are nothing more than a ‘not in my backyard’ attempt to force Delmarva Power to re-route its existing transmission line away from Ardentown and through other communities,” the lawsuit said.

Noting that the project’s completion deadline is the end of 2026, the lawsuit said that failing to finish by then “risks real-time operational reliability problems, including outages to a large number of customers or higher energy costs to customers.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Delaware

What The Stats Say About Wake Forest vs. Delaware

Published

on

What The Stats Say About Wake Forest vs. Delaware


The Wake Forest Demon Deacons are one of the best stories in college football. Led by Jake Dickert, they have become one of the most formidable teams in the country, capable of beating anyone in the ACC this season.

This week, though, they don’t have to worry about another conference opponent, and instead will turn their focus to the Delaware Blue Hens for their final non-conference game of the season. In what will be an emotional senior day, the Demon Deacons will look to end their final home game on a high note.

So what do the stats say about the Demon Deacons’ chances to end their final home game with a dominant win?

Wake Forest Demon Deacons

Oct 4, 2025; Blacksburg, Virginia, USA; Wake Forest Demon Deacons defensive lineman Dallas Afalava (52) and defensive back Nick Andersen (45) celebrate a fumble recovery during the first quarter against the Virginia Tech Hokies at Lane Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Brian Bishop-Imagn Images / Brian Bishop-Imagn Images

For the Demon Deacons, the defense has been the story of the season. Finding a way to combine talented transfer portal acquisitions with veterans who have been within the program and have the experience needed to give them one of the most lethal defenses, not just in the conference, but in the country as well.

Advertisement

Now, for the Deacs, they get to face a Blue Hens offense that will test strength against strength. They come in with a pass-happy offense, willing to throw the ball, and having to, because of their struggles in the run game. They rank ninth in pass play percentage (58.41), sixth in passes per game (42.4), and fourth in passing yards per game (310.9). Their biggest struggle in the passing game is important, though. They rank 86th in FBS in completion percentage, finding a connection with their receivers only 60.47 percent of the time.

That will play right into the hands of head coach Jake Dickert, whose defense is 13th in the country in opponent completion percentage at a 56.39 percent success rate. They also keep everything in front of them, ranking fourth in the country in yards per pass, forcing their opponents to average only 5.5 yards per attempt. The one knock on the stellar defensive play is their inability to cause havoc, ranked in the 100s in interception percentage and sack percentage.

Finding a way to fight off the pass will be the key in this one, with the Blue Hens showing an inability to run the ball effectively, ranking 100th or worse in yards per rushing attempt and rushing yards per game. Keeping the ball in front of them, and proving to be a ‘no fly zone’ should benefit them, and aid them in yet another win this season.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Delaware

Opioid Crisis Action Network head accused of coercing sexual favors from clients

Published

on

Opioid Crisis Action Network head accused of coercing sexual favors from clients


From Delco to Chesco and Montco to Bucks, what about life in Philly’s suburbs do you want WHYY News to cover? Let us know!

The head of a Delaware County advocacy group has been charged with using opioid settlement funds to coerce sexual favors from women experiencing addiction.

Delaware County District Attorney Jack Stollsteimer charged Lawrence Arata, executive director of the Opioid Crisis Action Network, with human trafficking, patronizing prostitutes, obstruction of justice and witness intimidation.

“Our investigation concluded that Larry Arata cynically and cruelly misused those funds as leverage to satisfy his sexual desires,” Stollsteimer said in a statement.

Advertisement

Arata turned himself in on Wednesday to the district attorney’s Criminal Investigation Division and later posted bail. No attorney was listed for Arata in online court records and he did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The Opioid Crisis Action Network did not respond to a request for comment.

Lawrence Arata, 65, founded the Upper Darby-based organization in 2018 with his wife, Heather Arata, shortly after their son died from a heroin overdose. The Opioid Crisis Action Network pays for treatment and housing for people with substance use disorder.

The organization was a recipient of opioid settlement money from Delaware County as well as the Pennsylvania Opioid Misuse and Addiction Abatement Trust, Stollsteimer said. The Criminal Investigation Division, in collaboration with the Upper Darby Police Department, initiated a joint investigation into Arata after receiving complaints.

“The allegations revolve around Arata receiving sexual favors from clients who are in recovery for drug addictions in exchange for program benefits such as meal credits, gift cards, bus passes, money, rental assistance, and the like,” the affidavit of probable cause reads.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending