Connect with us

Delaware

Companies continue to consider reincorporation. Does this mean trouble for Delaware?

Published

on

Companies continue to consider reincorporation. Does this mean trouble for Delaware?


play

Another company has threatened to move its legal headquarters out of Delaware, even after sweeping corporate law changes were made to protect corporate directors.

Eighty percent of all publicly traded companies come to Delaware for its judicial expertise in business dealings and corporate-friendly tax code, but is a mass exodus really upon the state?

Advertisement

Here’s what to know.

Affirm Holdings considers reincorporation

According to GuruFocus, financial technology company Affirm Holdings is reportedly contemplating reincorporating its business from Delaware to either Nevada or Texas.

The company’s CEO, Max Levchin, co-founded PayPal and worked with Elon Musk, whose publicly aired disagreements with Delaware’s Court of Chancery attemped to fuel a movement for corporations to leave Delaware.

In recent months, a number of other companies have expressed interest in moving legal headquarters from Delaware to states like Nevada.

Advertisement

AMC Networks, which owns and operates the AMC cable channel, as well as Madison Square Garden’s Entertainment company cited the increasing franchise tax obligations and uncertainty in judiciary rulings as drivers for reincorporation.

“By re-domesticating the company from Delaware to Nevada, we believe we will be better suited to take advantage of business opportunities and that Nevada law can better provide for our ever-changing business needs and lower our ongoing administrative expenses,” AMC Networks’ proxy statement says.

Other companies like DropBox and Roblox also are in the process of reincorporating to Nevada. Walmart and Meta, which owns Facebook, have reportedly expressed similar desires to leave Delaware, but no progress has been made on their fronts.

What started this pattern?

Advertisement

Delaware’s corporate laws, usually precedented by Delaware Court of Chancery’s rulings, dictate how controlling stockholders or Delaware-incorporated companies can cut deals. The speed and expertise of the court is one of the primary reasons companies choose to incorporate in Delaware in the first place.

“Delaware has been famous for its corporate law and its appeal to companies because you could pretty much always count on it doing a very sensible and balanced thing, even if it wasn’t the thing you wish they would have done,” said Larry Cunningham, , director of the University of Delaware’s Weinberg Center for Corporate Governance. Over the past couple of years, there’s been some debate about if that’s still true.”

The debate in question became inflated after December 2024, when a Delaware Chancery Court judge ruled Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s $56 billion pay package invalid for the second time. The decision sparked Musk to take to social media advising other businesses not to incorporate in Delaware. The ruling against Musk has since been appealed to the Delaware Supreme Court.

A few months later, the Delaware Supreme Court issued a decision in a case within Match Group Inc, which essentially stated that certain protocols must be taken before an “interested transaction,” that is one that involves a controlling shareholder with a potential conflict of interest, takes place.

Advertisement

This court decision was viewed by many companies with controlling shareholders as a catalyst of distrust in Delaware’s Court of Chancery, proof that the judiciary was not as reliable as it had long been perceived to be.

Since the Match decision, a number of companies have threatened to reincorporate from Delaware to other states, in a mass exodus that became known as ‘’DExit.”

The DExit scare led legislators and Gov. Matt Meyer to pass Senate Bill 21, essentially meant to reverse the Match decision by protecting directors and controlling stockholders in order to coax businesses to remain in the First State.

Senate Bill 21 was passed nearly unanimously and quickly signed by Meyer in March, but was not without controversy.

Advertisement

Email correspondence made available via Freedom of Information Act Request and a report from CNBC found that representatives for companies like Meta and Elon Musk’s legal team were involved in the bill’s drafting.

Supporters of the bill said the changes are a necessary course correction that will give corporations’ most powerful managers more predictability and consistency as they consider business transactions.

Opponents argued that the bill would hinder the Chancery Court’s ability to rule over conflicts of interest, allowing business leaders to benefit themselves at the expense of pensioners, retirees and ordinary investors.

Is ‘DExit’ a real threat?

Did SB21 fail in its intention to keep corporations in Delaware? The short answer is no, but it may be too soon to tell.

Advertisement

No matter the political and judicial landscape, one pattern has remained the same – companies leave Delaware every year. While exact numbers are hard to track, it’s generally safe to say that companies incorporated in Delaware far exceed companies that don’t.

“No single factor is going to decide what’s best for a company in terms of where to incorporate it,” said Cunningham. “I wouldn’t have expected [SB21] to promptly change any major decisions. It may have played some role, but it could be one in dozens of factors.”

During a Joint Finance Committee Hearing on Feb. 13, Delaware’s Department of State showed that over 80% of IPOs (initial public offerings) are incorporated in Delaware.

According to the presentation, the corporate landscape propped up by Delaware’s Division of Corporations, Courts and General Assembly generated around $2 billion in revenue for the state in 2024 from around 2 million entities incorporated in the state.

Advertisement

A number of the publicly available proxy documents that spell out reasons for leaving Delaware cite increasing franchise tax obligations in the state.

According to the Delaware Division of Revenue, all corporations incorporated in the state have a maximum tax of $200,000 and “large corporate filers” have a tax capped at $250,000. So, even trillion-dollar-companies like Meta pay a maximum of $250,000 in franchise taxes to Delaware – a price that more companies are citing as too high to stay in Delaware.

In terms of the “judicial uncertainty” referenced by many of the corporations threatening to re-incorporate, Cunningham believes the “drama may be overdone.”

“It’s true that businesspeople value certainty when making decisions,” Cunningham said. “I have not detected the pattern that is being described.”

Molly McVety covers community and environmental issues around Delaware. Contact her at mmcvety@delawareonline.com. Follow her on Twitter @mollymcvety

Advertisement





Source link

Delaware

Delaware state police trooper killed in active shooter incident at DMV facility; suspect also dead

Published

on

Delaware state police trooper killed in active shooter incident at DMV facility; suspect also dead


This story originally appeared on 6abc.

Delaware state police say a trooper was killed in what officials said was an active shooter situation at a DMV facility in New Castle on Tuesday afternoon.

The suspect in this incident is also dead, Gov. Matt Meyer said.

State police said they are “are continuing to assess additional injuries.” There is no official word yet on the exact number of people injured.

Advertisement

Police say the active shooter incident is now over.

The incident happened around 2 p.m. at the facility on Hessler Boulevard.

No further details have been made available.

Police are asking residents to avoid the area.

Stay with Action News and 6abc.com as this story develops.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Delaware

2 hurt after car crashes into building in Talleyville, Delaware

Published

on

2 hurt after car crashes into building in Talleyville, Delaware


Two people were hurt after a car crashed into a building in Talleyville, Delaware, Monday morning.

The incident occurred shortly before 11 a.m. along the 100 block of Brandywine Boulevard. Police said a woman was driving a light-colored vehicle when she somehow lost control and crashed through the first floor of a realty company.

A fire station is located across the street from where the crash occurred. Firefighters responded in less than a minute and the driver as well as another person were both taken to the hospital. Investigators told NBC10 both victims suffered minor injuries and are expected to be OK.

Crews removed the vehicle and boarded up the damaged building. They continue to investigate the cause of the crash.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Delaware

Delaware-based dark money group ‘Alabama Patients First’ unleashes TV, digital attack on Blue Cross Blue Shield 

Published

on

Delaware-based dark money group ‘Alabama Patients First’ unleashes TV, digital attack on Blue Cross Blue Shield 


A brand-new, out-of-state dark-money group launched an attack on Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama over the past week, and has already invested over $320,000 in negative television advertising alone. 

During some of this weekend’s largest SEC football matchups, including Alabama vs. Oklahoma, the group ran a shock-style message that is now being pushed to Alabama voters more aggressively than any political campaign could afford to spend on television at this point in the 2026 election cycle. 

According to business filings, “Alabama Patients First LLC” was formed in Delaware on December 11. The state is known for its Teflon business privacy laws. LLCs are not required to publicly list their ownership or members, making it an ideal vehicle for dark money to reach its target. 

Since its formation, the group has been busy in Alabama.

Advertisement

Using a “Paid for by Alabama Patients First” disclaimer, the group aired television advertisements, launched a website, and directed SMS marketing campaigns directly to voters, igniting a costly media attack against the state’s leading insurer. 

“They make a killing off telling you ‘No.’ Blue Cross Blue Shield: ‘No.’ That’s Blue Cross “B*******,” the ad says.

A station-by-station breakdown of the Alabama Patients First TV buy across multiple Montgomery-area outlets, including WSFA, WAKA, WCOV-TV, WNCF, and others, totals $226,071. 

The group also spent $102,000 across Birmingham, Huntsville, and Dothan media markets.

The buy spans six weekends, ranging from its first airing on December 14, with a much smaller spend scheduled after January 1, to a wind-down on January 18, 2026. 

Advertisement

By comparison, in the Montgomery media market, the group spent $211,633 in December and just $14,438 in January.

In total, the out-of-state group has spent at least $328,071 on pushing the TV spot to Alabama residents. 

Alabama Patients First’s TV spend isn’t the whole tab, either. The professional fees required to deploy such an operation likely reach into the millions – and the timing is striking.

The attack on Alabama began the same week that Jackson Hospital and Clinic, Inc. initiated a high-visibility litigation campaign against BCBS of Alabama. 

Jackson Hospital and its lender, Atlanta-based Jackson Investment Group, are on the clock for a December 31, 2025 bankruptcy court deadline to secure $100 million in public funding, which would help satisfy a debtor-in-possession (DIP) agreement the two signed earlier this year. 

Advertisement

Yellowhammer News requested information from officials at Jackson Investment Group, Jackson Healthcare, and Jackson Hospital to confirm or deny a connection between the hospital’s lending relationship and the creation of Alabama Patients First. 

At the time of publication, those requests went unanswered.

Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama did respond to the negative ad blitz in a statement on Monday afternoon.

“The ads are an intentional misrepresentation of how we do business,” Sophie Martin, Director of Corporate Communications for BCBS of Alabama, said.

“Based on the timing of the ads, we believe they are nothing more than an improper attempt by Jackson’s investor-lender to improperly influence litigation.”

Grayson Everett is the editor in chief of Yellowhammer News. You can follow him on X @Grayson270.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending