Connect with us

Dallas, TX

Early voters mostly supported Dallas’ propositions. Here’s what they rejected

Published

on

Early voters mostly supported Dallas’ propositions. Here’s what they rejected


Early voters rejected efforts to increase the pay for Dallas’ leaders but mostly approved of 13 other propositions backed by the City Council, according to unofficial preliminary election results.

Just 42% of early voters supported Proposition C. It would increase the mayor’s salary to $90,000 and the council members’ pay to $110,000.

There are 18 propositions on the Nov. 5 election ballot for Dallas voters. Four of them, Propositions R, S, T and U, were successfully petitioned onto the ballot through signature-gathering drives led by two nonprofit groups. Proposition A is a city code amendment the City Council sent to voters. The other 13 propositions were the result of a yearlong process to update the city’s charter. They include raising salaries, banning term-limited former council members from being eligible to be elected again and adding a preamble at the beginning of the charter.

Dallas’ charter is typically updated once every 10 years. It determines the powers of city government and how it operates and is structured.

Advertisement

Political Points

Get the latest politics news from North Texas and beyond.

The 15-member Dallas City Council was not in alignment on recommendations for how voters should weigh in on the entire slate of 18 propositions and there are no organized support or opposition groups for propositions A – Q.

Mayor Eric Johnson and council member Cara Mendelsohn told voters to reject all 18 propositions saying they felt too many of the proposals were “unwise, unnecessary and underdeveloped.” Johnson, Mendelsohn and the rest of the City Council urged voters not to support Propositions S, T and U, which would set new mandates for police spending and the city manager’s job status and bonuses, as well as make it easier for residents to sue the city.

Council members Adam Bazaldua, Zarin Gracey, Jaime Resendez and Chad West have publicly supported decriminalizing low levels of marijuana in Dallas, citing such arrests disproportionately affecting Black and Latino communities and concern it diverts police attention away from more serious crimes. Proposition R would ban Dallas police from arresting people on suspicion of carrying less than four ounces of marijuana.

Advertisement

West, on his X account last month, said he voted for Propositions A-R and against S, T, and U.

If none of the propositions pass, a new slate of proposals to update the charter could go to voters as soon as May. Otherwise, the soonest voters could consider new charter amendments would be in another two years.

Here’s a summary of the propositions backed by the majority of the City Council:

Proposition A has 68% of the early votes. This proposal makes a series of changes impacting the pension system for civilian employees as well as the board that oversees it. It adds language to the Dallas code that puts term limits for six of the seven pension board members. This amendment would eliminate a cap on the maximum amount the city can contribute, increase the contribution percentage for some members, and add language allowing the City Council to approve giving lump-sum payments to the pension fund.

Proposition B has 71% of the early votes. This proposal adds a preamble to the beginning of the city charter, which is essentially a mission statement saying Dallas is an equitable democracy, comprised of representatives that act to make the city fair, equitable, just, and safe for all residents.

Advertisement

Proposition C has 42% of the early votes. This proposal would raise the annual salary of Dallas’ mayor from $80,000 to $110,000 and the pay of the 14 district council members from $60,000 to $90,000. The change would go into effect starting in January. It would also allow yearly adjustments to the salaries equal to the year-over-year percentage increase in the local consumer price index.

Proposition D has 65% of the early votes. This proposal would remove references in the charter requiring City Council elections to be held in May and allow the City Council to set the election date via a resolution or ordinance. State legislators must separately also approve allowing Dallas to move council elections from May.

Proposition E has 69% of the early votes. This proposal would eliminate the ability of prior mayors or council members coming back to run for City Council after previously being elected and serving the maximum number of terms.

Proposition F has 67% of the early votes. This proposal clarifies that the city secretary and city auditor can hire and fire all employees in their offices. The charter currently just lists assistants.

Proposition G has 70% of the early votes. This would add language to the charter to restrict who can be appointed by a City Council member to the redistricting committee. The new criteria would disqualify relatives of council members, registered city lobbyists, people who have contractual obligations with the city, and others with ties to the city or elected officials.

Advertisement

Proposition H has 51% of the early votes. This proposal eliminates the requirement that members of the Redistricting Commission, City Plan Commission, Civil Service Board, and Park and Recreation Board be registered to vote, qualified voters, or qualified taxpaying citizens. Removing this requirement would put the eligibility of members who serve on these four groups in line with the rest of Dallas’ around 50 volunteer citizen boards and commissions.

Proposition I has 53% of the early votes. This proposal would increase the time people have to collect valid voters’ signatures on petitions to create a ballot proposition for a new Dallas ordinance in the city code or to change an existing one. The deadline extends from 60 days to 120. This proposition would also lower the number of valid voters’ signatures necessary on petitions. The minimum requirement drops from 10% of Dallas-qualified voters to 5%. The current 10% requirement equals around 70,000 signatures.

Proposition J has 61% of the early votes. This proposal would allow the City Council to replace appointed members of boards and commissions at any time before the end of that board or commission member’s two-year term via a majority council vote.

Proposition L has 69% of the early votes. This change would create a new chapter in the charter, moving the Inspector General division out of the city attorney’s office and establishing it as its own office. The Inspector General would report directly to the City Council rather than the city attorney.

Proposition O has 79% of the early votes. This proposal would update the charter to clarify the current position of Dallas associate municipal court judges and state that their qualifications are the same as municipal judges.

Advertisement

Proposition P has 53% of the early votes. This proposal would eliminate a charter requirement for a city employee who appeals their demotion or termination to an administrative law judge to pay half the costs for having that official conduct an appeal hearing.

Proposition Q has 71% of the early votes. This proposal approves a series of changes for Dallas’ charter to conform to state law and city code, correct and clarify language and match actual city practices.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Dallas, TX

Ken Paxton sues Dallas over voter-approved amendment to decriminalize marijuana

Published

on

Ken Paxton sues Dallas over voter-approved amendment to decriminalize marijuana


Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has sued the City of Dallas after it adopted a voter-approved charter amendment that decriminalizes possessing less than 4 ounces of marijuana.

Advertisement

About 67 percent of Dallas voters approved Proposition R in the November election. 

The amendment prohibits Dallas Police from making arrests or issuing citations for possession of up to 4 ounces marijuana. It also blocks the smell of marijuana from being used as probable cause for search or seizure and prohibits the use of city resources for THC tests, except as a part of a violent felony or felony narcotics investigation.

The City of Dallas directed the city to comply with the amendment earlier this week.

Advertisement

Recreational marijuana is still illegal in Texas.

Paxton’s lawsuit says that municipalities cannot refuse to enforce Texas drug laws.

Advertisement

“Cities cannot pick and choose which State laws they follow. The City of Dallas has no authority to override Texas drug laws or prohibit the police from enforcing them. This is a backdoor attempt to violate the Texas Constitution, and any city that tries to constrain police in this fashion will be met swiftly with a lawsuit by my office.” wrote Paxton in a statement.

The lawsuit is far from a surprise.

In January 2024, Paxton sued cities who passed similar measures, including Denton, Austin, San Marcos, Killeen and Elgin.

Advertisement

Judges overturned Paxton’s lawsuits against Austin and San Marcos.

The lawsuit against the city names Dallas Mayor Eric Johnson, city council members, interim city manager Kimberly Tolbert and interim police chief Michael Igo.

Advertisement

On Tuesday, Dallas City Council member Cara Mendelsohn proposed adding a clause to the amendment stating that Proposition R would not be enforced unless the state legalized marijuana. Council members voted against it.

“This is such a waste of your tax dollars. 4oz of marijuana is illegal in TX & USA. Now [Ken Paxton] will have to waste his time suing [The City of Dallas] and the city will waste tax dollars defending a losing case. We’ve put ourselves & the [Dallas Police Department] in a terrible position to violate our oath of office to uphold the law,” Mendelsohn wrote in a social media post.

Paxton’s office is requesting a trial to issue a permanent injunction to stop the city from implementing Proposition R.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Dallas, TX

Letters to the Editor — Educated students, power source subsidies, Dallas Wings, Cowboys

Published

on

Letters to the Editor — Educated students,  power source subsidies, Dallas Wings, Cowboys


Schools need driver’s ed

Re: “Dallas County Grads Likely Won’t Earn Enough — Study finds that students aren’t leaving school with skills, education sufficient to support themselves,” Monday editorial.

All of us who live in Dallas have a vested interest in the future success of our kids. There have been some disconnects between local schools and the needs of local businesses.

In my industry, auto sales, we’ve had a shortage of quality technicians and sales people. Many local schools have outstanding auto tech programs, and graduate students who could become very successful sales people. Both of these jobs have the potential to pay six figures within a relatively short period of time. Often a technician is making more money than his classmate who pursued a four-year degree.

Opinion

Advertisement

Get smart opinions on the topics North Texans care about.

The disconnect comes with graduating students who can be hired and covered by insurance. An applicant without a driver’s license is not employable in our industry as they are uninsurable. Driver’s education has been removed from most high schools, leaving the task of getting a driver’s license up to the student on their own time.

A student who lives in a family that can afford a car for them to practice in and the expense of the class has no issues getting a driver’s license. Unfortunately many students don’t have the available car, time nor money to do this.

Don Herring, Dallas

Students lack stability

You state fairly that students aren’t pursuing skills, education sufficient to support themselves.

Advertisement

It’s hard when the economically insecure are consumed with problems such as hunger, lack of shelter, poor living conditions, health issues and sleep deprivation.

Children need some stability to perform at all in school. Texas ranks last in most measurements supporting families. A struggling entrance almost guarantees a struggling exit and nonperforming results.

James Roberts, Dallas

Stop subsidizing power

Re: “Abbott supports more nuclear power — Office calls for supply chain upgrades, research network to turn vision into reality,” Tuesday news story.

I support no tax subsidies for nuclear plants (or for fossil plants or solar and wind farms or electric vehicles).

Advertisement

Are we now talking about equal opportunity power source subsidies? What ever happened to the idea that the government should not be picking electric power source winners and losers by providing subsidies?

Since when should the government be subsidizing private industry? Shouldn’t power sources be chosen based on the economic benefits those sources bring to the market place rather than government subsidies?

Government subsidies distort the real price of electricity hidden by the taxes we pay. There must be compelling evidence such subsidies are in the public interest, and the real cost of the subsidies must be disclosed.

Thomas L. Darte, Greenville

Learn from voucher failures

Gov. Greg Abbott and Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick have already declared their intention to have the Texas Legislature vote on school vouchers. Why can’t Texas politicians learn from other states that have tried school vouchers and eliminated them due to the high cost of the program?

Advertisement

Arizona enacted school vouchers in 2022 and this year faced a $1.4 billion budget shortfall, much of which was a result of voucher spending.

Texas public schools need adequate funding, and that is where the governor’s focus should be. Rural school districts are to be congratulated for opposing the governor’s support of school vouchers.

Jack Noteware, McKinney

People have spoken

Re: “School voucher crusade is anything but conservative,” by Glenn Rogers, Nov. 13 Opinion.

Thank you, Glenn Rogers, for your thoughts on the continued push for school vouchers. Once again, Gov. Greg Abbot and Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick seem willing to go to any extremes to promote their own agendas and that of their billionaire donors.

Advertisement

It doesn’t seem to matter to them that the people have spoken through their representatives against vouchers. As Rogers points out, it ‘s our public schools and teachers who are paying the price for their unyielding crusade. Quit holding them hostage!

Adele Younkin, Grapevine

Wings need seats

Re: “Can Bueckers have Clark-like impact?” by Kevin Sherrington, Sports Quick Take.

I’m delighted that the Wings got the first pick in the WNBA draft. Paige Bueckers is an excellent possible first choice, although there are other strong candidates.

Bueckers’ college coach Geno Auriemma hurt his credibility with his persistence that Bueckers was better than Caitlin Clark. He’s had to eat his words in many interviews since.

Advertisement

There has never been a player like Clark. Bueckers’ stats don’t compare; in fact, she’s not even in second place. Kelsey Plum is.

Wait till end of WNBA season next year and compare Bueckers’ rookie stats to Clark’s. Let’s see if it’s close. And you can’t ever overlook how Clark makes all the other players around her better and her enormous fan appeal.

A real disaster is that the Wings stadium only holds 6,000 seats. Can’t compare fan appeal if you don’t have seats to sell.

Larry Huddleston, Cedar Hill

Cowboys’ sky already fell

Re: “Is sky falling? Cowboys make some progress, but can’t catch Texans after metal falls,” by David Moore, Tuesday SportsDay column.

Advertisement

Is the sky falling? Nope, the sky fell several weeks ago. It fell when Jerry Jones decided to make the second worst decision in his career. Namely paying Dak Prescott millions, and now Prescott is smiling all the way to the bank.

Don Skaggs, Garland

We welcome your thoughts in a letter to the editor. See the guidelines and submit your letter here. If you have problems with the form, you can submit via email at letters@dallasnews.com



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Dallas, TX

Dallas Mavericks host annual turkey giveaway

Published

on

Dallas Mavericks host annual turkey giveaway


The Dallas Mavericks started the season of giving with the team’s annual turkey giveaway. 

Advertisement

The Mavs players who took part in Wednesday’s holiday giveaway really put a smile on people’s faces.

This is the sixth year that the Dallas Mavericks have teamed up with Kroger for the Mavs Turkey Giveaway.

Some 300 families served by Buckner International, a faith-based nonprofit, were each given an entire Thanksgiving meal complete with a turkey and all the fixings. 

Advertisement

People were extremely grateful for the food and celebrity interaction.

“Honestly, I feel very blessed,” said recipient Ruby Martinez. “It’s very nice for their part to come out on their day off and come out and help the community. It’s very big from their part.”

Advertisement

“Whenever I was a little kid, I wasn’t in a very fortunate situation to have a lot of turkey, a lot of sides, a lot of food at the table,” said Mavs player Derek Lively II. “For me to give back, it means a lot to me just to make a little bit of a difference in somebody’s day.”

The famed Maniacs were also on hand to entertain people as they waited in line. 

One woman in line said the event made her forget her financial troubles for a bit. She left with food and a bunch of autographs. 

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending