Connect with us

Austin, TX

Weather observers at Austin's airport have no windows or internet access – Austin Monitor

Published

on

Weather observers at Austin's airport have no windows or internet access – Austin Monitor


Professional weather observers inside the air traffic control tower at Austin-Bergstrom International Airport (ABIA) have no windows or internet access to check the weather radar, satellite imagery or other conditions across the region, according to federal documents.

The weather observers who play a vital role in the nation’s aviation system by serving as a human backup to automated weather systems can’t see or hear outside, so they have to walk down two flights of stairs and exit the tower to check the current weather conditions. To look up basic weather data online, they have to go outside and use their iPhones, the documents said.

“To me, as someone in meteorology, that’s just unacceptable,” said Troy Kimmel, a broadcast meteorologist who teaches at UT Austin. “If you go to (other major Texas airports), there’s not another place where weather observers can’t see or have access to tools. There’s not another site like Austin, Texas.”

“It just does not make any sense at all,” Kimmel said.

Advertisement

Michael Minasi/KUT News. Austin-Bergstrom International Airport serves more than 20 million passengers a year.

The city of Austin owns the air traffic control tower and helps maintain the building. But the people who work inside and the technology they use are under the purview of the Federal Aviation Administration.

“There have been no issues with (weather observers) obtaining weather observations at Austin Tower,” FAA spokesperson Tammy L. Jones said in an emailed statement. “Electronic devices, including cell phones, are not permitted in control towers. Internet connectivity is available for all authorized devices in other areas of the buildings.”

But the weather observers contracted by the FAA aren’t federal employees and don’t have access to those “authorized devices,” according to details buried in a trove of documents released by the National Transportation Safety Board. The documents are factual data collected as part of an investigation into a near-miss at ABIA between two large planes on a foggy morning in February 2023.

The NTSB is probing why Austin’s air traffic control cleared a FedEx Boeing 767 to land on the same runway where a Southwest Airlines Boeing 737 was preparing for takeoff. The FedEx plane aborted landing at the last moment, narrowly averting a collision that could have killed 128 passengers and the crew. A final NTSB report is expected soon.

Advertisement
A white jet taking off from ABIA. The bottom of the plane can be seen against a cloudy, gray sky.

Michael Minasi/KUT News. Pilots can make informed decisions about flight paths, especially in severe weather, with the meteorological reports they receive from the FAA’s contracted weather observers.

Weather observers were not considered a factor in the near-miss. But officials probing the incident interviewed a weather observer manager and asked if a lack of internet access made it harder to do the job.

“Absolutely, yes, sir. Absolutely,” responded John Prator, a veteran weather observer with experience at more than a dozen airports including some of the nation’s largest.

Prator and his employer, California-based Condor Reliability Services, did not respond to requests for comment for this story.

The FAA has already faced criticism for not having enough air traffic controllers in the Austin tower, resulting in mandatory overtime and six-day work weeks.

Advertisement

U.S. Democratic Reps. Lloyd Doggett and Greg Casar of Texas have blasted the agency for controller staffing levels at ABIA, part of a chronic nationwide shortage for which Doggett has demanded “swift and forceful actions.”

This story was produced as part of the Austin Monitor’s reporting partnership with KUT.

The Austin Monitor’s work is made possible by donations from the community. Though our reporting covers donors from time to time, we are careful to keep business and editorial efforts separate while maintaining transparency. A complete list of donors is available here, and our code of ethics is explained here.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Austin, TX

Austin police released officer-work body cam video after Sixth Street mass shooting

Published

on

Austin police released officer-work body cam video after Sixth Street mass shooting


Austin police say they are still investigating whether terrorism played a role in the Sixth Street mass shooting, describing it as a possible motive that remains under review.

On Thursday, the Austin Police Department released officer-worn body camera footage from the night of the shooting and played recordings of emergency calls placed in the moments after gunfire erupted early Sunday morning.

“Hello, this is Austin 911. There has been a shooting at Buford’s on Sixth Street. There are people dead,” a caller told dispatchers in one of the recordings. Authorities say numerous calls flooded the 911 center after a gunman opened fire, killing three people and injuring more than a dozen others.

Police Chief Lisa Davis said some of the footage investigators reviewed shows the suspect firing into a crowd, but those images are too graphic to release publicly. “Any video showing the suspect firing his pistol into the crowd is too graphic to show, and we will not be showing that publicly,” Davis said.

Advertisement

RELATED| APD releases bodycam footage, 911 calls from West 6th Street mass shooting

According to investigators, the suspect was driving on West Sixth Street toward Rio Grande Street when he stopped in front of Buford’s and fired into a crowd with a semi-automatic handgun. Body camera footage from responding officers captures the chaotic moments as police and bystanders reacted to the gunfire.

“I am with you,” one officer says in the video before shouting, “AR-15. AR-15. Down! Everybody down!”

Police say not all of the victims were inside the bar when the shooting occurred.“One of the victims was outside of Buford’s waiting for an Uber,” I said during a news conference. Chief Davis agreed that the victims were spread out. “These were not all the people who were in the bar,” she said. “Sixth Street is an entertainment area from east to west. It is an entertainment area. People come to walk along Sixth Street.”

Surveillance video shows the suspect later parking a black SUV, getting out with an AR-15-style rifle, and shooting a pedestrian. By that point, officers had already been dispatched and arrived 57 seconds after the first emergency call, police said. Investigators say the suspect then fired toward officers.“The suspect discharged his weapon at the direction of the officers. The three officers discharged their firearm, striking him multiple times,” Davis said. Body camera footage from the scene caught officers asking, “Where is he? Who shot them?” before additional gunfire is heard.

Advertisement

City leaders say the officers’ rapid response helped prevent further loss of life. Meantime, investigators are asking anyone with video or photos from that night to share them with them.



Source link

Continue Reading

Austin, TX

Austin Police Department updates procedures after controversial deportation

Published

on

Austin Police Department updates procedures after controversial deportation


AUSTIN, Texas — An update to the Austin Police Department’s (APD) procedures outlines that officers are not required to contact U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) when a person is found to have an ICE administrative warrant if they have no other arrestable charge.  

The update follows a controversial deportation from January, when a woman’s disturbance call to APD led to her detainment, alongside her 5-year-old child, who is a U.S. citizen.  

The incident led to questions from the community regarding the way APD is supposed to interact with ICE.  

In a March 4 memo, APD Police Chief Lisa Davis said that the directives provided by ICE administrative warrants could be confusing in their wording.

Advertisement

According to Davis, officers have not historically regularly encountered administrative warrants while using the National Crime Information Center database, which is used to conduct identity checks. However, in 2025, federal agencies began entering a large volume of administrative warrants into the system.

According to the memo, administrative warrants are formatted in a way that looks similar to criminal warrants in the system.

The APD General Orders have been updated to clearly define the difference between criminal warrants and ICE administrative warrants, as well as specific instructions for how ICE administrative warrants should be handled moving forward.

“APD recognizes the sensitivity of this issue, not only within our city but across the nation. These policies were updated to provide clarity to our officers, ensure compliance with state law, and maintain officer discretion guided by supervisory oversight and operational consideration,” Davis said in the memo.

The updated procedures instruct officers to contact their supervisor when a person is found to have only an ICE administrative warrant, but no other arrestable criminal charge. From there, the officer or their supervisor may contact ICE, but is not required to.

Advertisement

“Austin Police and City of Austin leadership share a paramount goal for Austin to be a safe city for everyone who lives, works, or visits here,” Davis said in the memo. “We particularly want to ensure that anyone who witnesses or is the victim of a crime feels secure in contacting the police for help.”

According to the memo, the entire APD staff will be required to complete new training regarding these updates.  

“In concert with the policy updates, APD is launching a public webpage to help people understand their rights and provide links to resources available from the City of Austin and community organizations, such as Know Your Rights training,” Davis said in the memo. “The webpage will also include information on the option of using APD Victim Services as an alternative to calling 9-1-1, when appropriate, and links to all general orders and policies related to immigration.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Austin, TX

Texas Plans Second Execution of the Year

Published

on

Texas Plans Second Execution of the Year


Cedric Ricks spoke in his own defense at his 2013 murder trial, something most defendants accused of a terrible crime do not do. Ricks confessed that he had killed his girlfriend, Roxann Sanchez, and her 8-year-old son. He admitted he was aggressive and had trouble controlling his anger, stating that he was “sorry about everything.” […]



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending