Connect with us

Austin, TX

Texas Supreme Court upholds law outlawing abortion even in so-called ‘hard cases’

Published

on

Texas Supreme Court upholds law outlawing abortion even in so-called ‘hard cases’


Another woman, Ashley Brandt, testified that when she was 12 weeks pregnant with twins, one of the babies was diagnosed with acrania, a fatal condition in which the skull fails to fuse. When the baby’s heart stopped, doctors told her, it would likely trigger labor, causing the healthy twin to die, as well. She traveled out of state to abort the stricken baby and gave birth to the healthy one, the court decision states. 

Another woman, Samantha Casiano, lamented having to carry to term her baby girl who was diagnosed 20 weeks into the pregnancy with anencephaly, a condition in which the baby lacks a major portion of the brain and therefore is unable to live more than a short time after birth. The baby died four hours after delivery, the decision says. 

Piecemeal challenges 

Texas outlawed abortion after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in June 2022, sending abortion law back to legislatures and state referendums. Since then, abortion supporters have tried to chip away at the law. 

Last year, The Center for Reproductive Rights, which supports abortion, filed a lawsuit challenging the law on behalf of several women who experienced severe pregnancy complications, and three doctors. 

Advertisement

The state’s Human Life Protection Act allows an abortion if doctors using “reasonable medical judgment” determine that a pregnant woman “has a life-threatening physical condition aggravated by, caused by, or arising from a pregnancy that places the female at risk of death or poses a serious risk of substantial impairment of a major bodily function unless the abortion is performed or induced.” 

In August 2023, a Travis County district court judge in Austin, the state capital, issued a short-lived injunction that sought to offer doctors a “good faith judgment” exception. This would allow abortions in cases where a pregnancy complication “poses a risk of infection or otherwise makes continuing a pregnancy unsafe for the pregnant person,” where “a condition exacerbated by pregnancy … cannot be effectively treated during pregnancy,” and where “a fetal condition where the fetus is unlikely to survive the pregnancy and sustain life after birth.” 

The state’s abortion statute does not contain such exceptions. 

During oral arguments in November 2023, a state supreme court justice asked a lawyer from the state attorney general’s office defending the state’s anti-abortion law if the statute’s requirement that doctors use “reasonable medical judgment” to determine if an abortion is necessary doesn’t put doctors in a tough situation. 

The lawyer said no. 

Advertisement

“They are allowed to use reasonable medical judgment, which is presumably the judgment they use when treating a patient in any given circumstance. And so the option, I guess, facing the legislature — you could either draw a line and allow them to use their reasonable medical judgment, or you can do what the trial court did and essentially eliminate the line so that there really will never be a circumstance in which a woman is unable to obtain an abortion,” said Assistant State Attorney General Beth Klusmann. 

(Story continues below)

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

“And so, there are always going to be harder calls at the edge of that line, but the only other option is to eliminate the line entirely,” she said. 

The case, which was decided Friday, May 31, is known as State of Texas v. Zurawski. 

Advertisement





Source link

Advertisement

Austin, TX

Texas law age-restricting app stores blocked by federal judge

Published

on

Texas law age-restricting app stores blocked by federal judge


08 January 2019, Hessen, Rüsselsheim: ILLUSTRATION – The App Store (M) logo can be seen on the screen of an iPhone. Photo: Silas Stein/dpa (Photo by Silas Stein/picture alliance via Getty Images)

A federal judge has blocked a Texas law aimed at keeping minors from using app stores without an adult’s consent. 

The decision is a win for major developers of app stores represented in the federal lawsuit, including Apple, Google and Amazon. 

Advertisement

Texas app store law blocked

What we know:

Senate Bill 2420 would have gone into effect on Jan. 1, requiring anyone under the age of 18 in Texas to get parental consent to download an app or make an in-app purchase. 

Advertisement

U.S. District Judge Robert Pitman in Austin issued a preliminary injunction against the law, saying it likely violates the First Amendment.

The case against the law, known as the App Store Accountability Act, was brought by Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA) on behalf of operators of app stores (like Google, Apple, and Amazon) and developers of mobile apps (like YouTube, Audible, Apple TV, IMDB, and Goodreads).

Advertisement

What’s next:

The law can not go into effect as litigation proceeds. 

Texas AG Ken Paxton is the sole defendant in the case, and is enjoined from enforcing or allowing enforcement of the law during that time. 

Advertisement

Texas lawsuit over SB 2420

The backstory:

Attorneys for the CCIA argued the law violates First Amendment free speech rights. Before the Austin court hearing last week, CCIA Senior VP Stephanie Joyce issued the following statement:

Advertisement

“We shall show the judge that this law is unconstitutional and should not take effect. This law is grossly overbroad, involves forced-speech mandates, and is not remotely tailored to its stated purpose. It is a deeply flawed statute that the Court should block under the First Amendment.”

Other cell phone restrictions

Dig deeper:

Advertisement

Australia recently passed a total social media ban for people under age 16. Texas attempted a similar law with House Bill 18, which was enjoined prior to SB 2420. 

A recent report about a school in Kentucky with a cellphone ban quoted administrators about an unexpected benefit. They claim a 61 percent increase in books being checked out from its library since the ban started.

Advertisement

In that Kentucky report, 38 percent of their disciplinary issues involved violating the cellphone ban. The administrators said they hope that number will drop after students come back from the holiday break. It’s too early to tell if that kind of data will be collected as part of the TEA review.

The Source: Information in this article came from a federal court filing and previous FOX Local coverage. 

TexasTexas PoliticsTechnology
Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Austin, TX

Texas camps add flood sirens after Camp Mystic tragedy

Published

on

Texas camps add flood sirens after Camp Mystic tragedy


Enter your email and we’ll send a secure one-click link to sign in.

KXAN Austin is a part of Nexstar Media Group, Inc., and uses the My Nexstar sign-in, which works across our media network.

Learn more at nexstar.tv/privacy-policy.

Advertisement

KXAN Austin is a part of Nexstar Media Group, Inc., and uses the My Nexstar sign-in, which works across our media network.

Nexstar Media Group, Inc. is a leading, diversified media company that produces and distributes engaging local and national news, sports, and entertainment content across its television and digital platforms. The My Nexstar sign-in works across the Nexstar network — including The CW, NewsNation, The Hill, and more. Learn more at nexstar.tv/privacy-policy.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Austin, TX

3,000 Waymos recalled after several close calls with Austin ISD students

Published

on

3,000 Waymos recalled after several close calls with Austin ISD students


TEXAS — The self-driving taxi known as Waymo is taking a break in Austin.

Since the beginning of the 2025-2026 school year, Austin Independent School District (AISD) has recorded at least 20 stop-arm violations committed by the autonomous vehicles.

Cameras installed on school buses through the district’s Stop-Arm Camera Program show Waymo vehicles passing buses when they brake and have their stop arm extended. In some instances, the self-driving vehicles come close to hitting students getting off the bus.

“There’s not a similar pattern,” said Travis Pickford, assistant chief of the Austin ISD Police Department. “There’s not consistency there, other than the Waymo’s are consistently passing our buses.”

Advertisement

Pickford said despite Waymo operating in Austin for years, the district only found out about the stop-arm violations this year when they switched to a new vendor for the Stop-Arm Camera Program.

AISD and Waymo have gone back and forth on this issue, with AISD notifying the company of the violations and the district’s demands for a software update. Waymo replied in November, saying its vehicles have been updated. 

Nonetheless, there were more violations cited by AISD, totaling at least 20 violations as of Nov. 20. And the issue, according to Pickford, is not exclusive to AISD.

“Eanes, Pflugerville, Leander, Round Rock, Del Valle, just to name those five,” he said. “I can only assume that if we’re seeing violations on our buses, it’s entirely possible that violations are occurring in those districts as well.”

“It’s our position and our belief that they need to stop operating while our school buses are out on the roadway,” Pickford said.

Advertisement

Because of the violations, Waymo voluntarily recalled more than 3,000 vehicles in its fleet.

Mauricio Peña, Waymo’s chief safety officer, said:

“While we are incredibly proud of our strong safety record showing Waymo experiences twelve times fewer injury crashes involving pedestrians than human drivers, holding the highest safety standards means recognizing when our behavior should be better.

“As a result, we have made the decision to file a voluntary software recall with NHTSA related to appropriately slowing and stopping in these scenarios. We will continue analyzing our vehicles’ performance and making necessary fixes as part of our commitment to continuous improvement.”

The recall report from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) also cites the stop arm violations are cause for the recall, stating:

Advertisement

“Prior to the affected Waymo ADS [automated driving system] receiving the remedy described in this report, in certain circumstances, Waymo vehicles that were stopped or stopping for a school bus with its red lights flashing and/or the stop arm extended would proceed again before the school bus had deactivated its flashing lights and/or retracted its stop arm.”

As Waymo plans to expand operations into San Antonio and Dallas, Pickford urged the company to ensure all vehicles are following the law before putting more students in the state in harm’s way.

“[People need to] be a voice and be a part of whatever safety working group is coming together to discuss Waymo or any autonomous vehicle operation in their area,” Pickford said.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending