Connect with us

Austin, TX

Texas attorney general threatens Austin over City Council's effort to protect health care for transgender people – Austin Monitor

Published

on

Texas attorney general threatens Austin over City Council's effort to protect health care for transgender people – Austin Monitor


Friday, May 3, 2024 by Amy Smith

Shortly after City Council acted Thursday to protect transgender people from discriminatory health care laws, Attorney General Ken Paxton issued a threatening statement, vowing to “consider every possible response to ensure compliance” with state law prohibiting gender-affirming care for minors.

Against this backdrop of escalating anti-trans rhetoric within the Republican Party, Council passed a resolution to protect the health, welfare and safety of trans and nonbinary people, as well as those who provide care or assist in facilitating gender-affirming care.

The resolution, which passed on a 10-1 vote, with Council Member Mackenzie Kelly voting no, is significant given recent developments in Texas such as the 2023 law banning gender-affirming health care for youth and Gov. Greg Abbott’s insinuation last month that trans teachers should be prohibited from wearing clothing that aligns with their gender identity.

Council Member Chito Vela sponsored the resolution and noted before the vote the dangers LGBTQIA+ people face in their daily lives. He thanked the speakers, “especially given the intimidation tactics used by some opponents (who) apparently sent armed individuals to intimidate supporters as they entered City Hall. That’s very disappointing and troubling,” he said. “Violence should not be a part of, or even threats of violence, should not be a part of our political discourse.”

Advertisement

The resolution directs that no city personnel or resources be used to investigate, prosecute or impose penalties on people seeking transgender health care, and that Austin police should make investigating such cases their lowest priority.

Many members of the LGBTQIA+ community and allies spoke in support of the resolution, while others spoke against the measure and based their opposition on either religious views or the likelihood that the state would punish Austin, as later evidenced by Paxton’s statement.

Speaking in support, Morgan Davis, a transgender man who serves on Austin’s Human Rights Commission, grew emotional when they recounted what it was like working as an investigator for Child Protective Services at a time when the agency was directed to look into reports of minors receiving gender-affirming care. Davis resigned instead, on grounds that “I took an oath to protect children. … Good people lost their jobs because they could not morally continue” to investigate trans kids, Davis said.

Before casting a dissenting vote, Kelly said that Austin, as a home rule city, “does indeed have a significant degree of autonomy. However … our autonomy should not be construed as a license to continually undermine state law. Repeated actions like this by our Council not only undermine the rule of law but also invite significant cost of litigation, which diverts valuable and limited city resources away from other critical services.”

Mayor Kirk Watson asked to be added as a co-sponsor to Vela’s resolution prior to the vote. Co-sponsors included Council members Ryan Alter, Zo Qadri, José Velásquez and Vanessa Fuentes. A Watson aide said the mayor would not comment on Paxton’s statement. Vela’s office did not respond by press time.

Advertisement

Photo by Emgann444, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons.

The Austin Monitor’s work is made possible by donations from the community. Though our reporting covers donors from time to time, we are careful to keep business and editorial efforts separate while maintaining transparency. A complete list of donors is available here, and our code of ethics is explained here.

You’re a community leader

And we’re honored you look to us for serious, in-depth news. You know a strong community needs local and dedicated watchdog reporting. We’re here for you and that won’t change. Now will you take the powerful next step and support our nonprofit news organization?

Advertisement





Source link

Austin, TX

Austin police released officer-work body cam video after Sixth Street mass shooting

Published

on

Austin police released officer-work body cam video after Sixth Street mass shooting


Austin police say they are still investigating whether terrorism played a role in the Sixth Street mass shooting, describing it as a possible motive that remains under review.

On Thursday, the Austin Police Department released officer-worn body camera footage from the night of the shooting and played recordings of emergency calls placed in the moments after gunfire erupted early Sunday morning.

“Hello, this is Austin 911. There has been a shooting at Buford’s on Sixth Street. There are people dead,” a caller told dispatchers in one of the recordings. Authorities say numerous calls flooded the 911 center after a gunman opened fire, killing three people and injuring more than a dozen others.

Police Chief Lisa Davis said some of the footage investigators reviewed shows the suspect firing into a crowd, but those images are too graphic to release publicly. “Any video showing the suspect firing his pistol into the crowd is too graphic to show, and we will not be showing that publicly,” Davis said.

Advertisement

RELATED| APD releases bodycam footage, 911 calls from West 6th Street mass shooting

According to investigators, the suspect was driving on West Sixth Street toward Rio Grande Street when he stopped in front of Buford’s and fired into a crowd with a semi-automatic handgun. Body camera footage from responding officers captures the chaotic moments as police and bystanders reacted to the gunfire.

“I am with you,” one officer says in the video before shouting, “AR-15. AR-15. Down! Everybody down!”

Police say not all of the victims were inside the bar when the shooting occurred.“One of the victims was outside of Buford’s waiting for an Uber,” I said during a news conference. Chief Davis agreed that the victims were spread out. “These were not all the people who were in the bar,” she said. “Sixth Street is an entertainment area from east to west. It is an entertainment area. People come to walk along Sixth Street.”

Surveillance video shows the suspect later parking a black SUV, getting out with an AR-15-style rifle, and shooting a pedestrian. By that point, officers had already been dispatched and arrived 57 seconds after the first emergency call, police said. Investigators say the suspect then fired toward officers.“The suspect discharged his weapon at the direction of the officers. The three officers discharged their firearm, striking him multiple times,” Davis said. Body camera footage from the scene caught officers asking, “Where is he? Who shot them?” before additional gunfire is heard.

Advertisement

City leaders say the officers’ rapid response helped prevent further loss of life. Meantime, investigators are asking anyone with video or photos from that night to share them with them.



Source link

Continue Reading

Austin, TX

Austin Police Department updates procedures after controversial deportation

Published

on

Austin Police Department updates procedures after controversial deportation


AUSTIN, Texas — An update to the Austin Police Department’s (APD) procedures outlines that officers are not required to contact U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) when a person is found to have an ICE administrative warrant if they have no other arrestable charge.  

The update follows a controversial deportation from January, when a woman’s disturbance call to APD led to her detainment, alongside her 5-year-old child, who is a U.S. citizen.  

The incident led to questions from the community regarding the way APD is supposed to interact with ICE.  

In a March 4 memo, APD Police Chief Lisa Davis said that the directives provided by ICE administrative warrants could be confusing in their wording.

Advertisement

According to Davis, officers have not historically regularly encountered administrative warrants while using the National Crime Information Center database, which is used to conduct identity checks. However, in 2025, federal agencies began entering a large volume of administrative warrants into the system.

According to the memo, administrative warrants are formatted in a way that looks similar to criminal warrants in the system.

The APD General Orders have been updated to clearly define the difference between criminal warrants and ICE administrative warrants, as well as specific instructions for how ICE administrative warrants should be handled moving forward.

“APD recognizes the sensitivity of this issue, not only within our city but across the nation. These policies were updated to provide clarity to our officers, ensure compliance with state law, and maintain officer discretion guided by supervisory oversight and operational consideration,” Davis said in the memo.

The updated procedures instruct officers to contact their supervisor when a person is found to have only an ICE administrative warrant, but no other arrestable criminal charge. From there, the officer or their supervisor may contact ICE, but is not required to.

Advertisement

“Austin Police and City of Austin leadership share a paramount goal for Austin to be a safe city for everyone who lives, works, or visits here,” Davis said in the memo. “We particularly want to ensure that anyone who witnesses or is the victim of a crime feels secure in contacting the police for help.”

According to the memo, the entire APD staff will be required to complete new training regarding these updates.  

“In concert with the policy updates, APD is launching a public webpage to help people understand their rights and provide links to resources available from the City of Austin and community organizations, such as Know Your Rights training,” Davis said in the memo. “The webpage will also include information on the option of using APD Victim Services as an alternative to calling 9-1-1, when appropriate, and links to all general orders and policies related to immigration.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Austin, TX

Texas Plans Second Execution of the Year

Published

on

Texas Plans Second Execution of the Year


Cedric Ricks spoke in his own defense at his 2013 murder trial, something most defendants accused of a terrible crime do not do. Ricks confessed that he had killed his girlfriend, Roxann Sanchez, and her 8-year-old son. He admitted he was aggressive and had trouble controlling his anger, stating that he was “sorry about everything.” […]



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending