Connect with us

Austin, TX

Texas attorney general threatens Austin over City Council's effort to protect health care for transgender people – Austin Monitor

Published

on

Texas attorney general threatens Austin over City Council's effort to protect health care for transgender people – Austin Monitor


Friday, May 3, 2024 by Amy Smith

Shortly after City Council acted Thursday to protect transgender people from discriminatory health care laws, Attorney General Ken Paxton issued a threatening statement, vowing to “consider every possible response to ensure compliance” with state law prohibiting gender-affirming care for minors.

Against this backdrop of escalating anti-trans rhetoric within the Republican Party, Council passed a resolution to protect the health, welfare and safety of trans and nonbinary people, as well as those who provide care or assist in facilitating gender-affirming care.

The resolution, which passed on a 10-1 vote, with Council Member Mackenzie Kelly voting no, is significant given recent developments in Texas such as the 2023 law banning gender-affirming health care for youth and Gov. Greg Abbott’s insinuation last month that trans teachers should be prohibited from wearing clothing that aligns with their gender identity.

Council Member Chito Vela sponsored the resolution and noted before the vote the dangers LGBTQIA+ people face in their daily lives. He thanked the speakers, “especially given the intimidation tactics used by some opponents (who) apparently sent armed individuals to intimidate supporters as they entered City Hall. That’s very disappointing and troubling,” he said. “Violence should not be a part of, or even threats of violence, should not be a part of our political discourse.”

Advertisement

The resolution directs that no city personnel or resources be used to investigate, prosecute or impose penalties on people seeking transgender health care, and that Austin police should make investigating such cases their lowest priority.

Many members of the LGBTQIA+ community and allies spoke in support of the resolution, while others spoke against the measure and based their opposition on either religious views or the likelihood that the state would punish Austin, as later evidenced by Paxton’s statement.

Speaking in support, Morgan Davis, a transgender man who serves on Austin’s Human Rights Commission, grew emotional when they recounted what it was like working as an investigator for Child Protective Services at a time when the agency was directed to look into reports of minors receiving gender-affirming care. Davis resigned instead, on grounds that “I took an oath to protect children. … Good people lost their jobs because they could not morally continue” to investigate trans kids, Davis said.

Before casting a dissenting vote, Kelly said that Austin, as a home rule city, “does indeed have a significant degree of autonomy. However … our autonomy should not be construed as a license to continually undermine state law. Repeated actions like this by our Council not only undermine the rule of law but also invite significant cost of litigation, which diverts valuable and limited city resources away from other critical services.”

Mayor Kirk Watson asked to be added as a co-sponsor to Vela’s resolution prior to the vote. Co-sponsors included Council members Ryan Alter, Zo Qadri, José Velásquez and Vanessa Fuentes. A Watson aide said the mayor would not comment on Paxton’s statement. Vela’s office did not respond by press time.

Advertisement

Photo by Emgann444, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons.

The Austin Monitor’s work is made possible by donations from the community. Though our reporting covers donors from time to time, we are careful to keep business and editorial efforts separate while maintaining transparency. A complete list of donors is available here, and our code of ethics is explained here.

You’re a community leader

And we’re honored you look to us for serious, in-depth news. You know a strong community needs local and dedicated watchdog reporting. We’re here for you and that won’t change. Now will you take the powerful next step and support our nonprofit news organization?

Advertisement





Source link

Austin, TX

Texas Governor Threatens Austin, Dallas and Houston’s World Cup Funding Over ICE Fight

Published

on

Texas Governor Threatens Austin, Dallas and Houston’s World Cup Funding Over ICE Fight


Governor Greg Abbott
Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott’s office turned preparations for the 2026 World Cup into the latest front in the U.S. battle over immigration enforcement, with the threat of pulling or withholding public safety grants from Houston, Dallas, and Austin unless the cities changed policies that state officials said limited police cooperation with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

According to The Texas Tribune, the funding at risk totaled about $200 million across the three cities, including World Cup-related public safety money for Dallas and grants tied to Houston’s role as one of the tournament’s host cities. The 2026 World Cup is scheduled to begin June 11 and will be played across the United States, Mexico, and Canada.

Houston, the largest city in Texas, moved first. Its City Council voted 13-4 to amend an ordinance that had restricted police from detaining people solely on ICE administrative warrants. Mayor John Whitmire’s office said the change would protect $114 million in state funding while preserving protections against unreasonable detention, Reuters reported.

The original Houston ordinance had removed a requirement that police wait up to 30 minutes for ICE agents to pick up people named in civil immigration warrants. The amendment dropped language that explicitly barred that practice and removed a description of ICE administrative warrants as not having been reviewed by a judge.

Advertisement

Abbott’s office called the Houston change “a step in the right direction.” Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton had already sued Houston officials over the policy, arguing that it violated Senate Bill 4, the state law that bars local governments from adopting measures that “materially limit” immigration enforcement.

Dallas also revised its police policy after Abbott’s office warned that the city could lose more than $32 million in public safety grants and more than $55 million in World Cup public safety funding. The new policy says officers may ask about immigration status when a person is lawfully detained or arrested, share that information with federal authorities, and assist ICE agents when “reasonable or necessary.”

Dallas Police Chief Daniel Comeaux said the department’s mission had not changed. “Our officers will follow the law, and our updated policy will affirm that we will cooperate with federal authorities when required,” Comeaux said, according to FOX Dallas-Fort Worth. “DPD exists to protect the safety of everyone in Dallas, and we will not stop individuals only to determine their immigration status.”

Civil rights groups criticized the pressure campaign. “Houston city council caved to the governor’s threats and intimidation,” Caro Rivera Nelson, an attorney with the ACLU of Texas, told Reuters. “The effective repeal of Proposition A is a stain on our state.”

Abbott’s office said the state expects cities to comply with Texas law. “Governor Abbott has been clear: cities in Texas must fully comply with state law and cooperate with federal immigration authorities to keep dangerous criminals off our streets,” spokesperson Andrew Mahaleris said.

Advertisement

.

© 2025 Latin Times. All rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission.



Source link

Continue Reading

Austin, TX

1 killed in Runaway Bay after severe storms tear across North Texas

Published

on

1 killed in Runaway Bay after severe storms tear across North Texas


At least one person was killed and numerous others have been injured after a powerful storm that apparently produced at least one tornado ripped across North Texas on Saturday night.

What we know:

Advertisement

Wise County Judge J.D. Clark confirmed at least one fatality in Runaway Bay after an apparent tornado hit the town on the banks of Lake Bridgeport. He said numerous other people have been injured and at least 20 families have been displaced.

A photo shared by FOX 4 News viewer Chad Casey showed what appeared to be a funnel that was backlit by lightning near Runaway Bay.

A FOX 4 News crew that arrived in the town about 50 miles northwest of Fort Worth found emergency vehicles along a highway, with power lines down and debris in the roadway.

Advertisement

The National Weather Service had issued a Tornado Warning for the area of Wise County where Runaway Bay is located at the time the damage happened. The NWS also warned people in the path of the storm of very large hail and damaging winds.

Storm damage is seen in Springtown, Texas, on April 25, 2026. (Chad Casey)


From: FOX 4

Advertisement

A Tornado Warning was also in effect for the Springtown area in Parker County when the same storm caused damage about 25 miles northwest of Fort Worth. 

Parker County officials reported a structure had collapsed in the Springtown area, and two people may be trapped inside. Chad Casey also shared video with FOX 4 News that showed damage to structures, billboards and vehicles.

Advertisement

What we don’t know:

The identity of the person killed by the storm has not yet been released.

The NWS will likely survey the damage Sunday to determine if a tornado indeed happened. If so, the agency will also assign a rating to the twister.

Advertisement

What they’re saying:

Clark said the American Red Cross is headed to the scene in Runaway Bay to help displaced families.

Advertisement

“A Reunification Center has been established at: 513 Port O’ Call Drive, Runaway Bay,” Clark wrote in a Facebook post. “Families seeking information about loved ones or needing assistance are encouraged to report to this location.”

He said everyone but first responders should avoid the Runaway Bay area.

This is a developing story. Refresh this page for updates.

Advertisement

The Source: Information in this story comes from FOX 4 News and the National Weather Service.

TexasNewsNews



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Austin, TX

Texas cooks up new rules for food trucks

Published

on

Texas cooks up new rules for food trucks


TEXAS — Beginning this summer, food trucks across Texas will no longer be bound to city limits. The state Legislature passed House Bill 2844 last year, and it strikes away the city-by-city permit structure and introduces a statewide approach instead.

For example, before the law passed, food truck operators wanting to work in the city of Austin one week then travel and cook in the city of Georgetown the next would have to apply and pay for each city’s approval.

“Every single city in Texas, and sometimes county as well, gets to currently regulate how food trucks work,” said Samuel Hooper from Institute for Justice, a legislative counsel. “They get to issue their own health permits. They get to run their own inspections. So as you can imagine, that gets really expensive really fast.”

But starting July 1, mobile vendors can operate from Lubbock to Austin using the same permit.

Advertisement

“Just one health inspection, one permit,” said Hooper. “You maintain public safety, but you get rid of all this bureaucracy.”

Hooper has lobbied for this type of food-business policy for years, including with his support of a similar bill introduced last year under HB 2683. The new HB 2844 was a parallel bill and took over as main legislation. A food truck enthusiast himself, Hooper said he is happy to see the policy come into full effect.

“Let food trucks focus on what they actually do best, which is cooking food and not doing paperwork,” Hooper said.

One Austin-based food truck owner, Suresh Mogili, carries the same philosophy while cooking burgers in his truck, Eat Love Repeat.

“I’ve been doing this business since 2019,” he said. “I’m from a different country; I’m from New Zealand, so last year I came to introduce the concept in the USA, so it’s a fusion style burger.”

Advertisement

Hooper said food trucks should have a less rigid structure to help aspiring operators like Mogili cook and serve instead of dealing with paperwork. Part of the roadblock is due to fears that brick-and-mortar businesses will suffer, he said, and pointed to a 2022 study that shows the opposite.

“It’s meant to be a way for people with less capital, less access to capital, maybe who are new to the country or state, to get up and running and start a business quickly,” Hooper said.

Texas joins the list of other states that have implemented similar structures for their food trucks, including Utah and Maryland.

Despite the growing trend nationwide, Hooper advises it might be best to max out control at the state level.

“You kind of have to strike that balance between wanting it to be local enough to respond genuinely to local and regional issues, and not so broad that it kind of erases those,” Hooper said.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending