Connect with us

Arkansas

ROBERT STEINBUCH: Free speech and inquiry | Arkansas Democrat Gazette

Published

on

ROBERT STEINBUCH: Free speech and inquiry | Arkansas Democrat Gazette


Robert Maranto, the Twenty-First Century Chair in Leadership at the University of Arkansas, Fayetteville’s Department of Education Reform, co-edited a just-released book discussing how the nation’s education system is failing to teach the values of free speech and inquiry.

Maranto said: “[P]rofessors, students, and regular Americans self-censor far more than during the McCarthy era . . . That atmosphere limits research on how to make life better, and it also undermines democracy, making us more like Russia or China.”

Here’s the interesting bit, though. Lil’ ol’ Arkansas has been at the vanguard of fighting this largely leftist intellectual scourge for several years now.

Advertisement

You might recall my columns from a while back detailing how Ashlyn Hoggard had her free-speech rights violated by an Arkansas university. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit aptly described what occurred: “Just outside the Student Union . . . student Ashlyn Hoggard set up a small table. She was accompanied by Emily Parry, a non-student representative for Turning Point USA . . . an organization focused on promoting free markets, limited government, and individual liberty. Hoggard and Parry aimed to recruit students for a local Turning Point chapter, which they hoped could become a registered student organization . . . But in short order, two University administrators . . . approached the table to investigate.”

One administrator “told Hoggard and Parry they could not ‘table’ at . . . the ‘Union Patio.’ If Hoggard and Parry wanted to set up a table and display their signage (‘Free Market, Free People,’ ‘Big Government Sucks’), [the administrator] explained, they could do so elsewhere–specifically, in a campus ‘Free Expression Area’ . . . University Police Officer Terry Phipps quickly arrived at the scene and ordered Parry to leave campus. Hoggard was told to take down her table. Her recruiting efforts–at least at her Union Patio informational table–were done for the day.”

The university told Ashlyn that to have free speech, she must register with school authorities, get five people to join her club before she, uh, tried to get people to join her club, write a constitution (is that all?), and get a school adviser. No biggie.

The court concluded: “[W]e find that the Tabling Policy, as applied to Hoggard, is unconstitutional.”

So, in 2019, as Ashlyn’s case was proceeding through the federal court system, I worked closely with two state legislators–then-state Rep. (now-Sen.) Dan Sullivan and then-Sen. Bob Ballinger–on drafting and enacting campus free-speech legislation for Arkansas known as the FORUM Act.

Advertisement

The law states: “State-supported institutions of higher education should strive to ensure the fullest degree of intellectual and academic freedom and free expression, and it is not the proper role of state-supported institutions of higher education to shield individuals from speech that is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, including without limitation ideas and opinions the individuals may find unwelcome, uncollegial, disagreeable, or even deeply offensive.”

Fast forward to last year, when a student at another Arkansas public university found himself in Ashlyn’s shoes (maybe red-and-white checkered canvas mules?), as his school twice told him and two friends that they couldn’t do precisely what Ashlyn had successfully litigated: set up a table and distribute conservative Turning Point USA literature without first engaging with school officials. As Yogi Berra famously said: “It’s like déjà vu all over again.”

On one occasion, a dean of students told the trio that in the future they would need to make a reservation with school officials prior to exercising their free-speech rights. And on another day, a campus police officer politely told the same students: “I’m going to take your student IDs, and we are going through the Office of Student Accountability.” (Yikes!)

Unlike Ashlyn’s ordeal, however, this time, this state university acknowledged quickly that these students didn’t violate any rules and they’re free to set up a table in the future to distribute conservative literature on campus without any school involvement or molestation.

Indeed, a school official stated that he intended to implement supplemental training for employees on free speech.

Advertisement

None of these apt corrective actions likely would’ve occurred absent Arkansas’ lead in enacting the FORUM Act.

Five long years after Arkansas enacted the FORUM Act–as attacks on free speech proliferated in academia throughout the country–the American Bar Association, which, oddly enough, is the academic accreditor for law schools, finally woke up (pun intended). This consistently leftist operation recently directed law schools to adopt free-speech-and-inquiry policies. (Ya think?)

As such, at my law school, I now serve on the committee addressing this mandate, chaired by fellow First Amendment advocate Josh Silverstein. You might recall him as the Bowen professor who shattered my standing as the singular academic at the University of Arkansas, Little Rock to be cited by the U.S. Supreme Court. (Have I mentioned Justice Clarence Thomas’ opinion in the case declaring unconstitutional affirmative action before?)

As chair, Silverstein had hoped that we could crib a policy from another similarly tasked school with a larger faculty and more resources. But, alas, that tree bore no fruit. So he put together a truly masterful first draft, lauded by free-speech organizations such as the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression. Again, Arkansas is leading the way on free expression.

Kudos to Silverstein for his great proposal, which comes as no surprise, as he contributed to the drafting of the FORUM Act. He’s an old hat when it comes to defending academic freedom.

Advertisement

The faculty-governance process at my school regarding this ABA mandate is underway. Silverstein’s draft moved through committee with the adoption of a few thoughtful tweaks from colleagues. Now it goes to the entire faculty, which will determine the final policy.

Rest assured that Arkansas will remain ahead of the curve when it comes to protecting free speech and inquiry on university campuses.

This is your right to know.


Robert Steinbuch, the Arkansas Bar Professor at the Bowen Law School, is a Fulbright Scholar and author of the treatise “The Arkansas Freedom of Information Act.” His views do not necessarily reflect those of his employer.

Advertisement



Source link

Arkansas

Arkies in the Beltway | Week of December 14, 2025 | Arkansas Democrat Gazette

Published

on

Arkies in the Beltway | Week of December 14, 2025 | Arkansas Democrat Gazette


This is “Arkies in the Beltway” for the week of Dec. 14, 2025! I’m Alex Thomas, Washington Correspondent for the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, with your look at national politics and the Arkansans influencing the discussions.

[Click here to listen to the podcast.]

Advertisement

Arkansas farm leaders are thankful for the White House’s plan to help agriculture, but they remain uneasy about farming’s immediate future.

The Trump administration plans to provide farmers across the country with one-time relief payments in the coming months. The package totals $12 billion, with row crop farmers set to receive most of the funds.

STORY: Arkansas farmers thankful, remain uneasy following Trump economic relief announcement

The Trump administration announced the relief package during a roundtable last Monday at the White House.

Two Arkansans — U.S. Sen. John Boozman, R-Ark., and Crittenden County farmer Charles Williams — joined other lawmakers and farmers for the event.

Advertisement

Read the full story in Monday’s edition of the Democrat-Gazette.

The Arkansas Army National Guard continues its mission in the nation’s capital. Roughly 100 National Guard members arrived in Washington, D.C., earlier this month to assist local law enforcement.

The topic of deploying National Guard units to cities across the country was the subject of a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing last Thursday.

Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., serves on the committee. The Little Rock senator defended the president’s ability to use the National Guard and military units in American cities, citing President Dwight Eisenhower’s 1957 decision to send federal troops to Little Rock to desegregate Little Rock Central High School.

STORY: Cotton defends Trump’s National Guard deployments to U.S. cities, compares them to Central High crisis

Advertisement

The Senate Judiciary Committee advanced David Clay Fowlkes’ nomination to the full chamber for its consideration.

President Donald Trump nominated Fowlkes to serve on the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas. The Arkansan currently serves as the district’s U.S. attorney.

STORY: U.S. Senate committee advances Fowlkes judicial nomination

Thank you for supporting “Arkies in the Beltway!” You can stay up to date with all Arkansas news at ArkansasOnline.com, or follow me on Bluesky for more developments from the nation’s capital!

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Arkansas

Kingston author’s new book debunks Arkansas’ graveyard myths | Arkansas Democrat Gazette

Published

on

Kingston author’s new book debunks Arkansas’ graveyard myths | Arkansas Democrat Gazette


Bill Bowden

bbowden@nwaonline.com

Bill Bowden covers a variety of news for the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, primarily in Northwest Arkansas. He has worked at the newspaper for 16 years and previously worked for both the Arkansas Democrat and Arkansas Gazette.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Arkansas

Arkansas Razorbacks vs. Texas Tech Red Raiders odds, picks and predictions

Published

on

Arkansas Razorbacks vs. Texas Tech Red Raiders odds, picks and predictions


The No. 17 Arkansas Razorbacks (7-2) and No. 16 Texas Tech Red Raiders (7-2) meet Saturday at the American Airlines Center in Dallas, Texas. Tip-off is set for noon ET (ESPN2). Let’s analyze BetMGM Sportsbook’s NCAA basketball odds around the Arkansas vs. Texas Tech odds and make our expert college basketball picks and predictions for the best bets.

Arkansas earned its second straight win last Saturday, rolling past the Fresno State Bulldogs 82-58. It covered as a 20-point home favorite, and the Under (160.5) hit. Arkansas controlled the game defensively, forcing 17 turnovers and holding the Bulldogs to 15% (4-for-26) shooting from 3-point range. G Darius Acuff Jr. led the way with 18 points, 8 assists, 5 rebounds and a steal.

Texas Tech extended its winning streak to 3 games Sunday with an 82-58 win over the LSU Tigers. The Red Raiders covered as 5.5-point home favorites, and the Under (153.5) cashed. Texas Tech locked in defensively, holding LSU to 17% (4-for-24) shooting from 3-point range. G Christian Anderson led all players with 27 points, 8 assists, 5 rebounds and 2 steals. F LeJuan Watts provided a double-double (15 points and 10 rebounds) off the bench.

Texas Tech and Arkansas last met March 27 in the NCAA Tournament Sweet 16. The Red Raiders survived an 85-83 OT win, while Arkansas covered as a 5.5-point underdog. The total pushed past the number, cashing the Over.

Advertisement

– Rankings: USA TODAY Sports Coaches Poll

Watch NCAA basketball on Fubo!

Arkansas vs. Texas Tech odds

Provided by BetMGM Sportsbook; access USA TODAY Sports Scores and Sports Betting Odds hub for a full list. Lines last updated at 9:49 a.m. ET.

  • Moneyline (ML): Arkansas -102 (bet $102 to win $100) | Texas Tech -118 (bet $118 to win $100)
  • Against the spread (ATS): Arkansas +1.5 (-115) | Texas Tech -1.5 (-105)
  • Over/Under (O/U): 157.5 (O: -105 | U: -115)

Arkansas vs. Texas Tech picks and predictions

Prediction

Arkansas 76, Texas Tech 73

BET ARKANSAS (-102).

This is a rematch the Razorbacks haven’t forgotten. They had Texas Tech on the ropes in the Sweet 16 last March before watching it slip away late, and this feels like a clear revenge spot on a neutral floor in Dallas.

Advertisement

What I like most is Arkansas’ backcourt. The Razorbacks are quicker, more dynamic and better equipped to control tempo, especially with Acuff starting to look more comfortable running the offense. When Arkansas is at its best, the ball is in its guards’ hands, pushing pace and creating pressure, and that’s an area where Texas Tech can struggle.

The Razorbacks’ losses this season have come against strong competition, and they were competitive in each one. Texas Tech, meanwhile, has been more uneven. The Red Raiders handled LSU, but they’ve also been blown out and pushed around by other quality opponents.

In a tight, high-energy matchup, I’ll trust the deeper roster, the fresher legs in the backcourt and the team with something to prove. Arkansas is the side for me.

PASS.

No need to play around with the spread when you can get the Razorback at plus odds on the moneyline.

Advertisement

BET UNDER 157.5 (-115).

Texas Tech leans on physical half-court defense, while Arkansas defends cleanly without sending teams to the line and ranks 28th nationally in 3-point defense. The Under has hit in 6 of Texas Tech’s last 7 games and 6 of Arkansas’ last 8, making this a strong trend-based spot.

For more sports betting picks and tips, check out SportsbookWire.com and BetFTW.

Follow SportsbookWire on Twitter/X and like us on Facebook.

College sports coverage from USA TODAY Sports Media Group:

Advertisement

Alabama / Auburn / Clemson / Colorado / Duke / Florida / Florida State / Georgia / Iowa / Kentucky / LSU / Michigan / Michigan State / Nebraska / North Carolina / Notre Dame / Ohio State / Oklahoma / Oregon / Penn State / Tennessee / Texas / Texas A&M / UCLA / USC / Washington / Wisconsin / College Sports Wire / High School / Recruiting





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending