Connect with us

Arkansas

GOP senators block border measure again | Arkansas Democrat Gazette

Published

on

GOP senators block border measure again | Arkansas Democrat Gazette


WASHINGTON — Senate Republicans again blocked a bill meant to clamp down on the number of migrants allowed to claim asylum at the U.S.-Mexico border as Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer sought Thursday to underscore GOP resistance to the proposal.

The legislation, negotiated by a bipartisan group of senators, was already rejected by most Republicans in February when it was linked to a foreign aid package for Ukraine, Israel and other U.S. allies. But with immigration and border security becoming one of the top issues of this year’s election, Democrats are looking for an answer to the barrage of GOP attacks, led by presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump.

“We gave Republicans a second chance to show where they stand,” Schumer, a New York Democrat, said after the vote. “Do they want to fix this so-called emergency or do they want to show blind allegiance to the former president even when they know he’s wrong?”

Schumer is trying to defend a narrow Senate majority in this year’s election and sees the Republican’s rejection of the deal they negotiated as a political “gift” for Democrats. Seeking to highlight Republican resistance to popular measures, Schumer is also planning to push forward a bill in June that would protect access to contraception.

Advertisement

The Democratic leader said it would “show the public who’s on what side, and in June we’re going to spend a significant amount of time talking about reproductive rights.”

On Thursday, most Senate Democrats again supported the procedural vote to begin debate on the border bill, but it failed to advance 43-50 after all but one Republican, Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, voted against it. When the proposal was brought up in February, the test vote failed 49-50 — well shy of the 60 votes needed to advance.

This time, not even some of the bill’s primary authors, Sens. James Lankford, an Oklahoma Republican, and Kyrsten Sinema, an Arizona independent, voted for Schumer’s move.

“Today is not a bill, today is a prop,” Lankford said on the floor ahead of the vote. “Everyone sees it for what it is.”

Sinema called the vote “political theater” that will do nothing to solve problems at the border.

Advertisement

“To use this failure as a political punching bag only punishes those who were courageous enough to do the hard work in the first place,” she said.

Sens. John Boozman, R-Ark., and Tom Cotton, R-Ark., voted against moving forward with this legislation.

Republican leaders spent much of the week decrying the vote as a bald-faced political maneuver and amplifying a well-worn criticism of President Joe Biden: That he bears responsibility for the historic number of migrants who have made their way to the U.S. in recent years.

“We’re nearing the end of President Biden’s term, and the American people’s patience for his failing to secure the southern border is running thin,” Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell, Ky., said Thursday.

Earlier in the week, McConnell told reporters, “The president needs to step up to it — do everything he can do on his own because legislation is obviously not going to clear this year.”

Advertisement

Since the collapse of the Senate’s legislation in February, the Biden administration has been considering executive orders on border policy and immigration. It has already made some changes to the asylum system meant to speed up processing and potential removal of migrants. Yet the Senate’s test vote this week was widely seen as part of a lead-up to Biden issuing more sweeping border measures, potentially as early as June.

Following the failed vote, Biden in a statement said that he was “committed to taking action to address our broken immigration system.”

He also slammed Republicans for blocking the bill, saying it showed they “do not care about securing the border or fixing America’s broken immigration system.”

The Democratic president has considered using a provision in federal immigration law that gives leeway to block entry of certain immigrants into the U.S. if it would be “detrimental” to the national interest of the United States. The authority was repeatedly tapped by Trump when he was in the White House, but some of those actions faced legal challenges.

Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas told reporters Monday that legislation to address problems at the border — as opposed to executive actions by the president — would be more effective. The Senate legislation would provide more money for Customs and Border Protection officials, asylum officers, immigration judges and scanning technology at the border — all things that officials have said the underfunded immigration and border protection system needs.

Advertisement

“The legislation provides tools that executive action cannot,” Mayorkas said.

The Senate bill is aimed at gaining control of an asylum system that has sometimes been overwhelmed in the last year. It would provide faster and tougher enforcement of the asylum process, as well as give presidents new powers to immediately expel migrants if the numbers encountered by border officials exceed an average of 4,000 per day over a week.

Even before the bill was fully released earlier this year, Trump effectively killed the proposal by labeling it “meaningless” and a “gift” for Biden’s reelection chances. Top Republicans soon followed his lead and even McConnell, who had initially demanded the negotiation over the border measures, voted against moving forward.

A significant number of Democrats have also criticized the proposal, mostly because it does not include any broad relief for immigrants who have already established lives in the United States. On the left, four Democrats, as well as Sen. Bernie Sanders, an independent of Vermont, voted against advancing the bill.

“It fails to address the root causes of migration or to establish more lawful pathways,” said Sen. Alex Padilla, a California Democrat.

Advertisement

The Congressional Hispanic Caucus said in a statement this week that the Senate’s bill “fails to meet the moment by putting forth enforcement-only policies and failing to include provisions that will keep families together.” They have urged executive actions that would provide protections from deportation for immigrants who have lived in the U.S. for years or who have family ties to U.S. citizens.

Amid the tension, Biden’s reelection campaign met with CHC leadership Wednesday to discuss outreach to Latino communities, and Biden spoke on the phone with Rep. Nanette Barragán, the chair of the group. She discussed the reasons for the group’s opposition, according to a person familiar with the call who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the private conversation.

Schumer said that if Democrats win majorities in the Senate and House next year, he wants to advance “comprehensive immigration reform.”

Still, for Democratic senators facing tough reelection battles this year, the vote Thursday provided another opportunity to show they were supportive of stronger border measures as well as distance themselves from Biden’s handling of the border.

As Sen. Jon Tester attempts to hold a Democratic seat in the red-leaning state of Montana, he said in a statement, “This common sense bill would push back on the Biden administration’s failed border policies by forcing the president to shut down the border, strengthen our asylum laws and end catch-and-release.”

Advertisement
    Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas speaks during the 36th Annual Candlelight Vigil to honor the law enforcement officers who lost their lives in 2023, during the National Police Week at the National Mall in Washington, Monday, May 13, 2024. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)
 
 
  photo  Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., speaks to reporters following a Democratic strategy session, at the Capitol in Washington, Tuesday, May 21, 2024. Schumer is planning to take another vote Thursday on border security and immigration legislation that Republicans blocked in February. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)
 
 



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Arkansas

Arkansas educational groups looking to amend state’s constitution; 90K signatures required

Published

on

Arkansas educational groups looking to amend state’s constitution; 90K signatures required


MILLER COUNTY, Ark. (KSLA) – Several educational groups in Arkansas are working together to make changes to amend the state constitution’s education clause.

Members with Arkansas Educational Rights brought their message to Miller County, saying they the amendment they are seeking will provide three critical things.

“First it provides universal access to the most proven educational standards that boost learning it requires any school that receive public financing to follow the same standards as public schools and the third potent take the existing Arkansas minimum education standards so future lawmakers can’t water down our educational qualities,” said Bill Kopsky, with Ark. Public Policy.

Before changes can be placed on the November ballot, they must collect over 90,000 signatures from at least 50 counties across the state. They say the petition drive is not without opposition.

Advertisement

“There have been a lot of propaganda going out that’s been paid by the opposition to spread a message against what we are trying to do and a lot of time that’s disinformation or misinformation at best because they are trying to confuse the voters,” said Steve Grappe, with Stand Up Arkansas.

The group has until July 5 to get the necessary signatures for the amendment to be on the ballot.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Arkansas

Arkansas sues Minnesota's Optum over role in opioid crisis

Published

on

Arkansas sues Minnesota's Optum over role in opioid crisis


Arkansas is suing Minnesota-based Optum Inc. and another pharmacy benefits manager, Express Scripts, for fueling the opioid crisis.

Court documents describe “the misuse, abuse, diversion and over-prescription of opioids” as “the worst man-made epidemic in modern medical history”.

Arkansas Attorney General Tim Griffin said the companies, which run prescription drug coverage for insurers, should be held accountable “for their roles in a crisis that has ravaged our state.”

“The (companies) benefited financially from the opioid crisis in Arkansas by negotiating favorable deals with opioid manufacturers,” Griffin said in a news release.

Advertisement

Optum, a subsidiary of UnitedHealth Group, denies the claims.

“Optum did not cause the opioid crisis or make it worse, and we will defend ourselves in this litigation,” the company said in a statement. “Optum takes the opioid epidemic seriously and has taken a comprehensive approach to fight this issue, including the Opioid Risk Management Program available to all Optum Rx clients, to address opioid abuse and promote patient health.”

Arkansas had the second-highest opioid prescription rate in the nation for many years, according to the suit, and remained the most commonly prescribed controlled substance as recently as 2022.

Pharmacy benefit managers “sit at the center of prescription-drug dispensing” and intentionally caused an oversupply of opioids in the state, the suit says.

The lawsuit accuses Optum and Cigna-owned Express Scripts of “colluding with Purdue Pharma and other opioid manufacturers to increase opioid sales through favorable placement on national formularies in exchange for rebates and fees.”

Advertisement

Formularies are lists of drugs covered by insurance plans.

The state is seeking unspecified damages and restitution for claims of creating a public nuisance, negligence and unjust enrichment.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Arkansas

Character crucial | Arkansas Democrat Gazette

Published

on

Character crucial | Arkansas Democrat Gazette


Editor’s note: The original version of this column was published Dec. 30, 2006.

In my formative years, my father frequently explained the significance behind the words character and integrity.

I was late into elementary school when the colonel’s indoctrination began. It must have been the various hardships of his own youth intertwined with a career of military service that urged him to advocate for living an honorable life.

His efforts had little, if any, impact through my teen years. I suppose my absorption with the magnificence of radiant selfhood served to prevent his message from penetrating too deeply. After all, there were far too many girls to impress and balls to catch and throw, not to mention a dawning horizon that reflected only the uniqueness of me.

Advertisement

Still, Rue B. Masterson, who survived World War II and Korea, refused to surrender when it came to pounding the meaning of these words into his children’s lives.

“Son, a person’s only as trustworthy as his or her word. It’s not about the body. Treat others the way you want to be treated. Show compassion for the less fortunate. Be honest with yourself and with others.”

Yet what did I hear back then? “Blah, blah, blah.”

Thus the wasted days of youth raced past. Then came the mid-20s and the responsibilities of a wife and infant son. I recalled the echoes of Dad’s mentoring about the time he was laid to rest in Harrison’s Maplewood Cemetery. After all those years, I had lived long enough to appreciate what he had tried so diligently to bequeath.

As I became a journalist in constant search of bits and pieces of truth, I also began to see the terrible consequences of violating one’s own character and integrity. No longer was this planet’s sole purpose my needs, my comforts and my immediate gratification. I also recognized that the truth, in all phases of life, can never be fully crushed or permanently buried.

Advertisement

I encountered a homeless alcoholic who’d spent three summers living inside a giant hollow log, and interviewed an impoverished single mother of four abandoned by her husband. There was a widow living in a squalid home without utilities. I visited jails and prisons and halfway houses. Everywhere I witnessed the results of life’s circumstances and insincerities. They stemmed from many causes, including deviations from truth, poor choices and the loss of integrity and character.

The weight of my own responsibilities had caused me to recognize that most of our human struggles were not created by our flexing our muscles, but rather by the choices about whether to do so.

I saw that we resort to needless retaliation in defense of overly sensitive egos and the outright lies that we so easily tell ourselves and others. We fail to realize that, in making purely physical decisions, we often brutalize the most significant aspects of our spiritual integrity.

The indefinable power that with a slap on our rump breathes consciousness into what otherwise would be an inanimate lump of meat is the same infinite force that instills these nobler traits for which my father lobbied so strenuously. This sets us apart from lower-functioning animals with the self-respect, compassion, devotion to truth and the reverence we display for our mutual value as fellow human beings, regardless of social or financial status.

Whenever we choose to violate the principles inherent in this force, we invariably pay the price, as surely as if we reject the principles of gravity. Invariably, each falsehood we attach to the essence of our being tells others something about our deepest nature.

Advertisement

Dad understood that every instance in which he sacrificed bits of the sacred stuff of his self for personal advantage, he knowingly abandoned his obligation to intellectual honesty within his own spirit.

Now, I wince whenever I recognize my many shortcomings. The unheeded wisdom delivered all those years ago, by a father who obviously possessed the same comprehension at a similar stage of his existence, today rings all too clear in his son.

This process we call a physical lifetime, lasting anywhere from a single moment to a century, transpires as in the flash of a firefly’s tail. All that lingers to prove that any of us existed are the remnants of what we believed in, stood for and left in the hearts and minds of those who remain to interact.

So here’s a salute to you, Colonel. Your frustrations during the deaf and blind era of my life were not in vain, although you never lived long enough to realize the impact of your efforts.

Today, with lies deemed acceptable and corruption thriving in boardrooms and the bureaucracies, the challenge has fallen upon my shoulders and yours, valued readers. It comes at a time in the history of these United States when the need to explain and demonstrate character and integrity to the generation still in childhood and generations yet unborn never has been more crucial.

Advertisement

Mike Masterson is a longtime Arkansas journalist, was editor of three Arkansas dailies and headed the master’s journalism program at Ohio State University. Email him at mmasterson@arkansasonline.com.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending