Connect with us

Arkansas

Auditor questions Arkansas governor, attorney general about implementation of 2% raises for employees

Published

on

Auditor questions Arkansas governor, attorney general about implementation of 2% raises for employees


An auditor for Arkansas Legislative Audit on Friday questioned Gov. Asa Hutchinson’s and Legal professional Normal Leslie Rutledge’s implementation of two% raises for workers who’re paid at their maximum-authorized salaries.

Kurt Cowl, supervising senior auditor for Arkansas Legislative Audit, questioned whether or not raises within the type of one-time, lump-sum funds to greater than 1,200 govt department staff ought to be calculated as 2% of their complete annual salaries.

In response, the state’s personnel director, Kay Barnhill, instructed the Legislative Joint Auditing Committee that state legislation is silent on whether or not the lump-sum funds ought to be primarily based on an worker’s annual wage or ought to be a prorated portion of that worker’s wage.

She stated the state plans to make the lump-sum funds to staff, a few of whom are paid as much as their maximum-authorized wage, primarily based on their annual salaries within the final pay interval of the fiscal yr that ends June 30.

Advertisement

As well as, Cowl stated 35 staff within the legal professional basic’s workplace have obtained 2% of their annual salaries as a lump-sum cost and can exceed their line-item wage appropriation by a complete of $37,546 as of June 30, in battle with the Arkansas Structure.

Brian Bowen, chief of workers for the legal professional basic, stated he disagreed with Cowl.

The two% raises are bonuses for these staff, and the legal professional basic’s workplace is complying with each state legislation and the Arkansas Structure, he stated.

On Feb. 17, Hutchinson introduced that the state’s govt department staff would obtain 2% cost-of-living raises, efficient Feb. 6, to assist offset rising inflation. At the moment, state Division of Transformation and Shared Companies spokeswoman Alex Johnston stated the two% raises would improve the common wage for these staff from about $46,588 a yr to about $47,519 a yr.

Barnhill subsequently knowledgeable the staff on the most of their pay grade that the lump-sum funds of their checks in late February had been by chance given on the fallacious time and that they must pay again that cash of their subsequent paycheck in March.

Advertisement

Cowl stated a 2% wage improve was added to the bottom hourly price of twenty-two,453 govt department staff, leading to a first-year value of $21.2 million to the state.

One-time, lump-sum funds totaling $1.28 million had been made in error to 1,266 govt department staff in late February quite than within the final pay interval of the fiscal yr that ends June 30, as is required by Arkansas Code Annotated 21-5-211, he stated.

The Workplace of Personnel Administration subsequently started a course of for recouping the funds, and the vast majority of these staff had sufficient funds within the March 11 payroll disbursement, so the misguided lump-sum funds might be recovered via discount of web pay and taxes, Cowl stated.

He stated 27 of the staff didn’t have adequate payroll funds obtainable within the March 11 disbursement, so the lump-sum cost was recovered over the subsequent 4 pay durations, ending April 22.

These staff at the moment are scheduled to obtain a one-time, lump-sum cost within the final pay interval within the fiscal yr, and it’ll not be a recurring cost in subsequent fiscal years, Cowl stated.

Advertisement

He stated Hutchinson’s information launch concerning the 2% raises said that “This 2 % improve is efficient on February 6.”

Consequently, a proportionate quantity can be 2% of wage for 5 months as a substitute of the complete 12 months, to be paid as a lump sum within the final pay interval of the fiscal yr or to be added to the bottom wage, Cowl stated.

Due to this fact, calculating lump-sum funds primarily based on a full yr’s wage was not licensed by Hutchinson, Cowl stated.

However Barnhill stated Hutchinson meant to make the lump-sum funds to staff, paid as much as their licensed most wage, primarily based on the staff’ annual salaries.

Afterward, Hutchinson spokeswoman Shealyn Sowers stated a precise date has not been decided for when the governor will decide of how a lot cash govt department companies can be licensed to spend on advantage raises for workers on the finish of this fiscal yr.

Advertisement

Cowl stated 10 non-executive department companies and places of work additionally determined to award 2% wage will increase in February.

He stated 1,359 staff obtained the two% improve on their base hourly price, totaling $1.69 million at these 10 non-executive department companies and places of work, and 90 staff obtained lump-sum funds totaling $125,702.

Workers at eight of the ten non-executive department companies and places of work will obtain the one-time cost within the final pay interval of the fiscal yr, however staff on the legal professional basic’s workplace and Recreation and Fish Fee obtained lump-sum funds in February, Cowl stated.

ATTORNEY GENERAL

Thirty-six staff within the legal professional basic’s workplace obtained a lump-sum cost, and the state Workplace of Personnel Administration reversed the funds to those staff, in step with the reversals for govt department staff, who had been paid a lump sum at the moment, he stated.

Advertisement

Cowl stated the legal professional basic’s workplace subsequently requested that the lump-sum funds be reinstated as a cost-of-living improve, saying that “AG’s discretion” offered the authority to make these funds.

On March 7, the state Workplace of Personnel Administration manually entered into the state’s computerized accounting system the lump-sum funds for 35 staff primarily based on a spreadsheet offered by the legal professional basic’s workplace and backdated the funds to Feb. 6, he stated.

All 35 staff obtained a full 2% of their present wage, totaling $57,127, as a lump-sum cost, and they’ll exceed their line-item wage appropriation by $37,546 as of June 30 in battle with Arkansas Structure Article 16, Part 4, Cowl stated. As well as, one worker obtained 2% added to the bottom wage, he stated.

He stated Arkansas Legislative Audit couldn’t determine authority for an “AG’s discretion” lump-sum wage improve that will enable staff to be paid in extra of their most line-item wage appropriation.

A Legislative Joint Auditing Committee co-chairman, Rep. Richard Womack, R-Arkadelphia, stated it sounds just like the legal professional basic’s discretion is “made up.”

Advertisement

However Bowen instructed state lawmakers that the legal professional basic’s workplace disagrees with attorneys for Arkansas Legislative Audit on this matter and that cheap attorneys can disagree.

The legal professional basic’s workplace is exempt from the state’s Uniform Classification and Compensation Act, he stated.

Bowen stated the legal professional basic’s workplace has traditionally granted pay raises to staff and never exceeded the line-item most wage, and it additionally granted bonuses to staff.

The legal professional basic’s workplace isn’t prohibited from giving bonuses to its staff and has adopted state legislation and the Arkansas Structure and stayed inside its appropriation for salaries, he stated.

“There isn’t a definition of wage within the code,” Bowen stated.

Advertisement

“We aren’t exceeding our wage and line-item maxes,” he stated, and “we’ve got greater than sufficient in our appropriation to award the bonuses this yr.”

Afterward, state Sen. Jason Rapert, R-Conway, stated in a written assertion that “as common, it seems that Leslie Rutledge is once more thumbing her nostril on the Legislature and utilizing the individuals’s cash as she sees match.”

“The Normal Meeting units the salaries of all state staff and nobody has the authority to pay greater than what we’ve got specified by legislation,” he stated.

Rutledge spokeswoman Amanda Priest stated Friday in a written assertion that “since taking workplace, Legal professional Normal Rutledge has made it a precedence to be a conservative steward of taxpayers’ cash, doing extra with much less as our annual expenditures present.”

“In February, the legal professional basic gave eligible workers a 2% increase, much like what she and different constitutional officers have accomplished in earlier years,” she stated. “Solely these staff whose salaries had been at, or close to, their line-item most got a one-time bonus which doesn’t affect their wage.”

Advertisement

Rutledge and Rapert are two of the six Republican candidates operating for lieutenant governor within the Might 24 major.

GAME AND FISH COMMISSION

Cowl instructed lawmakers that the Arkansas Recreation and Fish Fee made lump-sum funds to 2 staff for whom the two% wage improve would increase their complete wage above the utmost for his or her pay grade in February.

Though the fee licensed sure cost-of-living changes throughout its Feb. 25 assembly, primarily based on its minutes, it didn’t authorize lump sum-payments to be made primarily based on their whole yr’s wage, he stated.

It seems the fee ought to calculate lump-sum funds primarily based on a proportion of every worker’s annual wage from Feb. 6 via the top of the fiscal yr on June 30 — not a whole yr’s annual wage — Cowl stated.

Advertisement

In response, fee Chief Fiscal Officer Emily Shumate wrote in a letter dated April 27 to Cowl that the Arkansas Recreation and Fish Fee meant for the cost-of-living lump-sum funds to incorporate 12 months of earnings for these staff.

“Going ahead, AGFC will develop coverage and process for processing lump sum funds,” it stated.

    Sen. Kim Hammer questions Kay Barnhill (left), director of the Workplace of State Procurement, and Mitch Rouse (proper), chief basic counsel, in the course of the committee assembly Friday. (Arkansas Democrat-Gazette/Staci Vandagriff)
 
 



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Arkansas

FDA phasing out ineffective decongestant | Arkansas Democrat Gazette

Published

on

FDA phasing out ineffective decongestant | Arkansas Democrat Gazette


WASHINGTON — U.S. officials are moving to phase out the leading decongestant found in hundreds of over-the-counter medicines, concluding that it doesn’t actually relieve nasal congestion.

Phenylephrine is used in popular versions of Sudafed, Dayquil and other medications, but experts have long questioned its effectiveness. Last month, the Food and Drug Administration formally proposed revoking its use in pills and liquid solutions, kicking off a process that’s likely to force drugmakers to remove or reformulate products.

It’s a win for skeptical academics, including researchers at the University of Florida who petitioned the FDA to revisit the drug’s use in 2007 and again in 2015. For consumers, it will likely mean switching to alternatives, including an older decongestant that was moved behind the pharmacy counter nearly 20 years ago.

Doctors say Americans will be better off without phenylephrine, which is often combined with other medicines to treat cold, flu, fever and allergies.

Advertisement

“People walk into the drugstore today and see 55,000 medicines on the shelf, and they pick one that is definitely not going to work,” said Dr. Brian Schroer of the Cleveland Clinic. “You take away that option, and it will be easier for them to self-direct toward products that really will help them.”

The FDA decision was expected after federal advisers last year voted unanimously that oral phenylephrine medications haven’t been shown to relieve congestion.

Experts reviewed several recent, large studies indicating that phenylephrine was no better than a placebo at clearing nasal passageways. They also revisited studies from the 1960s and 1970s that supported the drug’s initial use, finding numerous flaws and questionable data.

The panel’s opinion only applied to phenylephrine in oral medications, which account for roughly $1.8 billion in annual U.S. sales. The drug is still considered effective in nasal sprays, though those are much less popular.

Phenylephrine wasn’t always the top choice for cold and allergy products. Many were originally formulated with a different drug, pseudoephedrine.

Advertisement

But a 2006 law required pharmacies to move pseudoephedrine products behind the counter, citing their potential to be processed into methamphetamine. Companies such as Johnson & Johnson and Bayer decided to reformulate their products to keep them readily available on store shelves — and labeled many of them as “PE” versions of familiar brand names.

PHARMACY NEEDED

Consumers who still want to take pills or syrups for relief will probably need to head to the pharmacy counter — where the pseudoephedrine-containing versions of Sudafed, Claritin D and other products remain available without a prescription. Purchasers need to provide a photo ID.

Beyond those products, most of the other options are over-the-counter nasal sprays or solutions.

Saline drops and rinses are a quick way to clear mucus from the nose. For long-term relief from seasonal stuffiness, itching and sneezing, many doctors recommend nasal steroids, sold as Flonase, Nasacort and Rhinocort.

Advertisement

“These medicines are by far the most effective daily treatment for nasal congestion and stuffiness,” Schroer said. “The biggest issue is they’re not great when used on an as-needed basis.”

Nasal steroids generally have to be used daily to be highly effective. For short-term relief, patients can try antihistamine sprays, such as Astepro, which are faster acting.

Phenylephrine-based sprays will also remain on pharmacy shelves.

SWALLOWING STIFLES AID

The experts who challenged the drug’s effectiveness say it’s quickly broken down and rendered ineffective when it hits the stomach.

Advertisement

“This is a good drug, but not when it’s swallowed,” said Leslie Hendeles, professor emeritus at the University of Florida’s College of Pharmacy, where he co-authored several papers on the ingredient. “It’s inactivated in the gut and doesn’t get into the bloodstream, so it can’t get to the nose.”

When Hendeles and his colleagues first petitioned the FDA on phenylephrine, they suggested a higher dose might be effective. But subsequent studies showed that even doses 400% higher than those currently recommended don’t treat stuffiness.

The FDA and other researchers concluded that pushing the dosage even higher might carry safety risks.

“If you’re using very high doses, the risk is raising blood pressure so high that it could be hazardous to patients,” said Randy Hatton, a University of Florida professor who co-led the research on phenylephrine.

Because of its cardiovascular effects, the drug is sometimes used to treat dangerously low blood pressure during surgery, Hatton noted.

Advertisement
    Decongestant pills containing phenylephrine are displayed for a photograph in Philadelphia on Monday, Dec. 9, 2024. (AP Photo/Jonathan Poet)
 
 
  photo  A decongestant pill containing phenylephrine is displayed for a photograph in Philadelphia on Monday, Dec. 9, 2024. (AP Photo/Jonathan Poet)
 
 
  photo  A decongestant pill containing phenylephrine is displayed for a photograph in Philadelphia on Monday, Dec. 9, 2024. (AP Photo/Jonathan Poet)
 
 



Source link

Continue Reading

Arkansas

Sam Pittman breaks down Arkansas' biggest transfer portal needs

Published

on

Sam Pittman breaks down Arkansas' biggest transfer portal needs


With the transfer portal in full swing, Arkansas coach Sam Pittman addressed some of the biggest areas of need for his team. The Razorbacks are coming off of a 6-6 finish in the fifth year under Pittman and looking to boost their roster for another run in 2025.

Speaking with media, Pittman highlighted both the offensive and defensive line as the areas where Arkansas needs to be most aggressive in the portal. He also cited the linebacker group as a the position that the team feels best about, saying the Razorbacks will look to improve its defensive backs room first.

“Offensive line would be one (area of need),” the coach said. “Defensive line would be one. We felt like we were pretty good at the linebacker spots. If you go back and look a couple of years ago, the world was falling because this linebacker (left), that linebacker (left).

“I think we all agreed out linebacker room was a strength for us this year. But that would be probably the least worried about (position). We need some safeties. We need some corners. But I think O-line and tight end’s a big deal. Wide receivers. We’ve got several spots to fill, but off the top of my head, that’s who it would be.”

Advertisement

Since Pittman’s comments, Arkansas has been active in the transfer portal to bring in 13 players. Unfortunately, they’ve also lost 26 more and rank just No. 59 out of 70 teams in On3’s Transfer Portal Team Rankings.

Staying true to to his word, Pittman has brought in four offensive linemen and a pair of defensive lineman through the portal. Former Georgia Tech offensive tackle Corey Robinson II is the highest rated of those additions, coming in as the No. 32 overall player and No. 5 player at his position according to On3’s Transfer Portal Player Rankings.

Arkansas also brought in former Charlotte receiver O’Mega Blake and former Cincinnati cornerback Jordan Young to give it three players ranked in the top 150.

The Razorbacks still have a long way to go to complete their portal class, likely hoping to add some more defensive linemen before it closes later this month. They are looking to make the next push in the SEC next season and the players they’ve gotten so far are a good start.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Arkansas

Part of Arkansas book ban law is unconstitutional, federal judge rules

Published

on

Part of Arkansas book ban law is unconstitutional, federal judge rules


A federal judge ruled on Monday that sections of an Arkansas law, which sought to impose criminal penalties on librarians and booksellers for distributing “harmful” material to children, were unconstitutional.

The law, known as the Arkansas Act 372, was signed into law last year by Republican governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders. It was challenged by a coalition of organizations in the state, leading to a lengthy legal battle that concluded this week.

Two sections of Act 372 subjected librarians and booksellers to jail time for distributing material that is deemed “harmful to children”. Proponents of the law, including Sanders, said the law was put in place to “protect children” from “obscene” material.

“Act 372 is just common sense: schools and libraries shouldn’t put obscene material in front of our kids,” Sanders said in a statement to KATV-TV. “I will work with Attorney General Griffin to appeal this ruling and uphold Arkansas law.”

Advertisement

The governor signed the bill into law in March 2023, and a coalition of organizations in the state, including the Central Arkansas Library System in Little Rock and the ACLU of Arkansas, challenged it last year, saying the law was vague, overly broad and that the fear of criminal penalties would have a chilling effect on librarians across the state. A federal court temporarily blocked the enforcement of the two sections in question, while the law was being challenged in court.

The two sections that were struck down on Monday had established a criminal misdemeanor for “furnishing a harmful item to a minor”, and would have required local governments to create oversight boards to review challenged material. The organizations opposing the law argued that local officials, at their own discretion, could censor whichever books and material they pleased.

“This is a significant milestone on a long, sometimes rocky road we were obligated to travel after the passage of Act 372,” said Nate Coulter, executive director of the Central Arkansas Library System, in response to Monday’s ruling.

“We took that path to protect our librarians from prosecution for doing their jobs and to prevent some local elected officials from censoring library books they did not feel were ‘appropriate’ for our patrons to read.”

skip past newsletter promotion
Advertisement

In 2004, a federal judge struck down a similar law. The year prior, the state passed a law that required booksellers and librarians to hide materials deemed “harmful to minors”. It was deemed unconstitutional after legal challenges.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending