Connect with us

Arkansas

Arkansas’ largest campaign donors include Stephens, Waltons and Oaklawn’s Cella

Published

on

Arkansas’ largest campaign donors include Stephens, Waltons and Oaklawn’s Cella


On the eve of the Could 24 primaries, the biggest contributors to Arkansas’ 2022 campaigns embody acquainted names similar to funding banker Warren Stephens and the Arkansas Realtors Affiliation, plus a bounty of out-of-state {dollars}.

Arkansas’ high particular person contributors are Stephens and Oaklawn Racing’s president, Louis Cella, in keeping with marketing campaign finance disclosures filed with the Arkansas secretary of state’s workplace. Every has disbursed greater than $50,000 amongst favored 2022 candidates, data present.

Largest contributors thus far amongst political motion committees (PACs), which characterize particular pursuits, embody the Realtors affiliation, at virtually $183,000, and nursing residence homeowners’ Arkansas Well being Care Affiliation, about $125,000.

Then there are the out-of-staters, most with out obvious Arkansas ties however who’ve offered greater than $7 million to the marketing campaign of 1 candidate, Republican gubernatorial hopeful and former Trump White Home press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders.

Advertisement

Amongst donors’ addresses: Backyard Metropolis, N.Y.; Beverly Hills, Calif.; Odessa, Texas; Milton, Wis.

Marketing campaign contributions from these and a whole bunch of different locations exterior Arkansas make up about 59% of Sanders’ marketing campaign contribution data that listing donor names and addresses, in keeping with the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette’s evaluation of marketing campaign finance knowledge. Identify and deal with data isn’t required for donations below $50.

Whole marketing campaign contributions to Sanders’ marketing campaign stand at $14.3 million, in keeping with marketing campaign finance data from Jan. 1, 2021, by means of March 31, the latest filings obtainable.

Latest gubernatorial candidates who broke data — Democrat Mike Ross in 2014 and Republican Gov. Asa Hutchinson in 2018 — collected $6.4 million and $5.9 million, respectively.

“I am grateful for the record-breaking assist I’ve acquired throughout each county in our state and each state in our nation,” Sanders mentioned by means of a marketing campaign spokesman.

Advertisement

Some state candidates, particularly these from smaller legislative districts, have discovered 2022 election fundraising to include challenges, mentioned Rep. David Ray, R-Maumelle, marketing campaign supervisor for Lt. Gov. Tim Griffin’s race for lawyer normal.

With covid-19 restrictions final yr, “there have been fewer in-person gatherings, similar to occasions held in peoples’ houses. Thankfully, a number of that has subsided and in-person gatherings are just about again to regular at this level,” he mentioned.

Financial pressures are obvious in some instances, he mentioned. “I am positive there are actually donors who might usually give however who’re feeling financial uncertainty proper now and giving much less, or not contributing this cycle.”

The second-highest fundraiser amongst all state candidates, Griffin’s marketing campaign has raised $2.3 million for his lawyer normal race, marketing campaign finance data present.

Ray defines his candidate’s fundraising as a hit, coming “from each nook of the state and that is a mirrored image that he’s a extremely sturdy candidate.” About 1% of Griffin’s marketing campaign contributions are from exterior Arkansas, data present.

Advertisement

Griffin has one opponent within the Republican Main for lawyer normal. Leon Jones Jr. of Little Rock reviews elevating $73,522 in marketing campaign contributions. Democrat Jesse Gibson is the lone opponent for the November Basic Election, reporting $195,050.

The state’s third-largest marketing campaign fundraiser and the main Democrat is Chris Jones of Little Rock, former govt director of the Arkansas Regional Innovation Hub.

His marketing campaign reviews $1.7 million in contributions, with about 57% of these which can be itemized by deal with coming from out-of-state, in keeping with secretary of state data.

Jones communications director Clint Schaff says his marketing campaign is not stunned that Sanders has raised a number of out-of-state cash with a deal with “culture-war points made as much as stir nationwide dialog.”

He says Jones’ deal with offering preschools, broadband and jobs in Arkansas has “impressed folks throughout the nation.”

Advertisement

Jones faces 4 opponents within the Democratic main, Anthony Bland ($6,528 whole in marketing campaign contributions), Jay Martin ($1,520), James Russell ($7,051) and Supha Xayprasith-Mays ($25,925).

It is troublesome to overstate the dimensions of Sanders’ marketing campaign contributions in Arkansas’ 2022 election.

The Sanders marketing campaign’s $14.3 million accounts for greater than $2 of each $5 raised by all candidates for state govt, legislative and judicial places of work.

Along with her work within the Trump White Home and because the daughter of former Arkansas Gov. and former presidential candidate Mike Huckabee, Sanders’ title recognition attracted out-of-state, in addition to in-state, contributors, specialists say.

As a result of essential coverage is made on the state degree, nationwide contributions to state races are “a development that was growing properly earlier than the present election cycle, and Sarah has actually benefited from it way over different candidates in search of state workplace” in Arkansas, mentioned Ouachita Baptist College emeritus political science Prof. Hal Bass, who as soon as taught Sanders.

Advertisement

Sanders has one opponent within the Republican gubernatorial main, podcaster Doc Washburn. His marketing campaign reviews elevating $38,355, in keeping with secretary of state data.

BIG GIVERS

Arkansas’ third-largest particular person donor is Walmart inheritor and businessman Jim Walton, at $44,100, in keeping with marketing campaign contribution knowledge analyzed by the Democrat-Gazette.

Others embody: Shreveport nursing residence proprietor John Ponthie, $22,700; Houston businessman Thomas Friedkin, $21,800; El Dorado oil and timber businessman Madison Murphy, $21,400; and Witt Stephens of Little Rock, CEO of The Stephens Group, $21,200. Most have been massive donors in Arkansas elections previously.

Marketing campaign finance reviews additionally present huge donors typically group with members of the family and enterprise associates to multiply contributions to a candidate past Arkansas’ authorized most for one donor. This yr’s max is $2,900 per-candidate, per-election, which frequently interprets into one massive donor giving $5,800 towards a candidate’s celebration main and normal election.

Advertisement

One instance is Jim Walton’s and spouse Lynne’s giving to Republican Doyle Webb’s run for lieutenant governor.

In early November, Lynne Walton despatched two donations of $2,900, or $5,800 whole, to Webb’s marketing campaign, data present. Jim Walton adopted late that month with $5,800 extra.

Large donors can also contribute to political motion committees and political events which can be more likely to ship nonetheless more cash to the campaigns of their most popular candidates.

PACs, typically constructed round shared enterprise pursuits or political convictions, often donate bigger quantities to campaigns total than even essentially the most beneficiant people.

Marketing campaign finance data present different massive PAC donors in Arkansas 2022 elections thus far, behind the Realtors and nursing residence teams, embody:

Advertisement

• DBH Administration Consultants of Morrilton, $98,625 from seven DBH PACs.

• 9 PACs related with the Fayetteville group Conduit for Motion, $88,450.

• Motion Committee for Rural Electrification of Little Rock, $78,000.

• Arkansas Dental Political Motion Committee of Little Rock, $51,300.

• Arkansas Trucking Affiliation Political Motion Committee of Little Rock, $50,300.

Advertisement

Marketing campaign contributions from PACs and particular person donors alike can have larger affect on less expensive legislative races, significantly in rural Arkansas, specialists say.

Marketing campaign watchers estimate funding a state Home seat race on this state requires about $50,000, a state Senate seat $150,000. Closely contested races value extra. One PAC or particular person huge donor’s contribution carries extra heft in these races, in comparison with statewide campaigns.

One instance is the Home District 94 marketing campaign of Rep. Jeff Wardlaw, R-Hermitage, which has raised $67,131 thus far. Of that, $8,500, or about 13%, has come from 4 DBH Administration Consultants PACs, in keeping with marketing campaign finance data.

Wardlaw faces no Republican Main opponent. Two candidates have filed to face him within the Democratic Main in November: Curley Jackson, $0 in contributions, and Andrew Pritt, $10,650.

Large donors “should not a ubiquitous group of individuals however have differing motivations,” mentioned College of Arkansas, Fayetteville political science Assistant Professor Karen Sebold.

Advertisement

Some search entry to soon-to-be elected officers to assist beliefs they assume are essential, she and different specialists say. One other motivation is investing in a candidate they consider might rise increased in politics.

Responses from the state’s two greatest PAC donors point out they search for candidates pleasant to their pursuits, significantly concerning authorities regulation of their industries.

The manager director of the nursing residence group, Arkansas Well being Care Affiliation, wrote that as a result of long-term-care amenities are extremely regulated, they’ve “problems with concern on the legislature always, and that has been the case for many years. Due to this, trade members really feel a have to train their constitutional proper to have interaction in our electoral course of.”

The Well being Care Affiliation chooses to assist candidates the identical manner different industries and voters themselves do, govt director Rachel Bunch wrote. It is based mostly on a candidate’s “place on problems with significance, understanding of the healthcare trade, its funding and regulation, and willingness to hear, amongst different issues.”

The Arkansas Realtors Affiliation seems for candidates “who’re enterprise pleasant, and supportive of particular person property rights,” the affiliation’s communications director Megan Anthony wrote.

Advertisement

The group additionally backs candidates who “are dedicated to sturdy and truthful regulation to advertise a wholesome housing market and supply safety for homebuyers and sellers.”

The most important particular person donor thus far to state races, Stephens Inc. chairman and CEO Warren Stephens, declined to speak to the newspaper about his marketing campaign contributions. A spokesman for Oaklawn’s Cella didn’t reply to data requests.

Ouachita Baptist’s Bass mentioned political science textbooks usually cite financial, social and ideological motivations behind sizable marketing campaign donors.

Financial incentives that embody attracting governmental favors “was extra widespread earlier than civil service reform,” Bass mentioned.

Social incentives embody the satisfaction a donor would possibly really feel “rubbing shoulders with others at fundraising occasions,” or aspirations for unpaid appointments to prestigious boards and commissions.

Advertisement

Ideological incentives check with a donor’s need to elect like-minded candidates, who will remodel a shared situation into public coverage.

“In these polarized occasions, ideological incentives look like on the rise in accounting for donations,” Bass mentioned in an e-mail.

CARRYOVER

Marketing campaign contributions for the 2022 Arkansas elections will not wind down till not less than a month after the Nov. 8 normal election. Candidates who’ve marketing campaign money owed to repay get extra time to attempt to catch up.

These with leftover marketing campaign funds have a number of choices, together with carrying over cash for future campaigns, mentioned UA Fayetteville’s Sebold.

Advertisement

Which means Sanders’ towering governor’s race purse may benefit her past the Arkansas state traces, she mentioned.

“She’s been talked about as a presidential candidate, possibly not subsequent cycle, however the subsequent. After which there are some who say it might occur subsequent cycle,” Sebold mentioned.

Meantime, Sanders’ marketing campaign fundraising already has redefined the race for the state’s highest political workplace, political specialists say.

Her marketing campaign collected $9.1 million by October, 2021, 4 months earlier than submitting formally started.

The subsequent month, Lawyer Basic Leslie Rutledge, a Republican who had introduced for the governor’s race greater than a yr earlier, exited to run for lieutenant governor.

Advertisement

Griffin left the governor’s race lengthy earlier than Rutledge. In February, 2021, simply weeks after Sanders introduced her gubernatorial plans, he mentioned he would as an alternative run for Rutledge’s present lawyer normal job.

The Sanders marketing campaign’s “stacks of money had been a driver for positive,” mentioned U A political science professor Janine Parry. “Even well-known figures within the state needed to concede that her candidacy was a juggernaut out of the gate.”

    Candidates report hundreds of thousands, 1000’s in donations
 
 
  photo  Prime donors pump cash into state races
 
 



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Arkansas

FDA phasing out ineffective decongestant | Arkansas Democrat Gazette

Published

on

FDA phasing out ineffective decongestant | Arkansas Democrat Gazette


WASHINGTON — U.S. officials are moving to phase out the leading decongestant found in hundreds of over-the-counter medicines, concluding that it doesn’t actually relieve nasal congestion.

Phenylephrine is used in popular versions of Sudafed, Dayquil and other medications, but experts have long questioned its effectiveness. Last month, the Food and Drug Administration formally proposed revoking its use in pills and liquid solutions, kicking off a process that’s likely to force drugmakers to remove or reformulate products.

It’s a win for skeptical academics, including researchers at the University of Florida who petitioned the FDA to revisit the drug’s use in 2007 and again in 2015. For consumers, it will likely mean switching to alternatives, including an older decongestant that was moved behind the pharmacy counter nearly 20 years ago.

Doctors say Americans will be better off without phenylephrine, which is often combined with other medicines to treat cold, flu, fever and allergies.

Advertisement

“People walk into the drugstore today and see 55,000 medicines on the shelf, and they pick one that is definitely not going to work,” said Dr. Brian Schroer of the Cleveland Clinic. “You take away that option, and it will be easier for them to self-direct toward products that really will help them.”

The FDA decision was expected after federal advisers last year voted unanimously that oral phenylephrine medications haven’t been shown to relieve congestion.

Experts reviewed several recent, large studies indicating that phenylephrine was no better than a placebo at clearing nasal passageways. They also revisited studies from the 1960s and 1970s that supported the drug’s initial use, finding numerous flaws and questionable data.

The panel’s opinion only applied to phenylephrine in oral medications, which account for roughly $1.8 billion in annual U.S. sales. The drug is still considered effective in nasal sprays, though those are much less popular.

Phenylephrine wasn’t always the top choice for cold and allergy products. Many were originally formulated with a different drug, pseudoephedrine.

Advertisement

But a 2006 law required pharmacies to move pseudoephedrine products behind the counter, citing their potential to be processed into methamphetamine. Companies such as Johnson & Johnson and Bayer decided to reformulate their products to keep them readily available on store shelves — and labeled many of them as “PE” versions of familiar brand names.

PHARMACY NEEDED

Consumers who still want to take pills or syrups for relief will probably need to head to the pharmacy counter — where the pseudoephedrine-containing versions of Sudafed, Claritin D and other products remain available without a prescription. Purchasers need to provide a photo ID.

Beyond those products, most of the other options are over-the-counter nasal sprays or solutions.

Saline drops and rinses are a quick way to clear mucus from the nose. For long-term relief from seasonal stuffiness, itching and sneezing, many doctors recommend nasal steroids, sold as Flonase, Nasacort and Rhinocort.

Advertisement

“These medicines are by far the most effective daily treatment for nasal congestion and stuffiness,” Schroer said. “The biggest issue is they’re not great when used on an as-needed basis.”

Nasal steroids generally have to be used daily to be highly effective. For short-term relief, patients can try antihistamine sprays, such as Astepro, which are faster acting.

Phenylephrine-based sprays will also remain on pharmacy shelves.

SWALLOWING STIFLES AID

The experts who challenged the drug’s effectiveness say it’s quickly broken down and rendered ineffective when it hits the stomach.

Advertisement

“This is a good drug, but not when it’s swallowed,” said Leslie Hendeles, professor emeritus at the University of Florida’s College of Pharmacy, where he co-authored several papers on the ingredient. “It’s inactivated in the gut and doesn’t get into the bloodstream, so it can’t get to the nose.”

When Hendeles and his colleagues first petitioned the FDA on phenylephrine, they suggested a higher dose might be effective. But subsequent studies showed that even doses 400% higher than those currently recommended don’t treat stuffiness.

The FDA and other researchers concluded that pushing the dosage even higher might carry safety risks.

“If you’re using very high doses, the risk is raising blood pressure so high that it could be hazardous to patients,” said Randy Hatton, a University of Florida professor who co-led the research on phenylephrine.

Because of its cardiovascular effects, the drug is sometimes used to treat dangerously low blood pressure during surgery, Hatton noted.

Advertisement
    Decongestant pills containing phenylephrine are displayed for a photograph in Philadelphia on Monday, Dec. 9, 2024. (AP Photo/Jonathan Poet)
 
 
  photo  A decongestant pill containing phenylephrine is displayed for a photograph in Philadelphia on Monday, Dec. 9, 2024. (AP Photo/Jonathan Poet)
 
 
  photo  A decongestant pill containing phenylephrine is displayed for a photograph in Philadelphia on Monday, Dec. 9, 2024. (AP Photo/Jonathan Poet)
 
 



Source link

Continue Reading

Arkansas

Sam Pittman breaks down Arkansas' biggest transfer portal needs

Published

on

Sam Pittman breaks down Arkansas' biggest transfer portal needs


With the transfer portal in full swing, Arkansas coach Sam Pittman addressed some of the biggest areas of need for his team. The Razorbacks are coming off of a 6-6 finish in the fifth year under Pittman and looking to boost their roster for another run in 2025.

Speaking with media, Pittman highlighted both the offensive and defensive line as the areas where Arkansas needs to be most aggressive in the portal. He also cited the linebacker group as a the position that the team feels best about, saying the Razorbacks will look to improve its defensive backs room first.

“Offensive line would be one (area of need),” the coach said. “Defensive line would be one. We felt like we were pretty good at the linebacker spots. If you go back and look a couple of years ago, the world was falling because this linebacker (left), that linebacker (left).

“I think we all agreed out linebacker room was a strength for us this year. But that would be probably the least worried about (position). We need some safeties. We need some corners. But I think O-line and tight end’s a big deal. Wide receivers. We’ve got several spots to fill, but off the top of my head, that’s who it would be.”

Advertisement

Since Pittman’s comments, Arkansas has been active in the transfer portal to bring in 13 players. Unfortunately, they’ve also lost 26 more and rank just No. 59 out of 70 teams in On3’s Transfer Portal Team Rankings.

Staying true to to his word, Pittman has brought in four offensive linemen and a pair of defensive lineman through the portal. Former Georgia Tech offensive tackle Corey Robinson II is the highest rated of those additions, coming in as the No. 32 overall player and No. 5 player at his position according to On3’s Transfer Portal Player Rankings.

Arkansas also brought in former Charlotte receiver O’Mega Blake and former Cincinnati cornerback Jordan Young to give it three players ranked in the top 150.

The Razorbacks still have a long way to go to complete their portal class, likely hoping to add some more defensive linemen before it closes later this month. They are looking to make the next push in the SEC next season and the players they’ve gotten so far are a good start.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Arkansas

Part of Arkansas book ban law is unconstitutional, federal judge rules

Published

on

Part of Arkansas book ban law is unconstitutional, federal judge rules


A federal judge ruled on Monday that sections of an Arkansas law, which sought to impose criminal penalties on librarians and booksellers for distributing “harmful” material to children, were unconstitutional.

The law, known as the Arkansas Act 372, was signed into law last year by Republican governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders. It was challenged by a coalition of organizations in the state, leading to a lengthy legal battle that concluded this week.

Two sections of Act 372 subjected librarians and booksellers to jail time for distributing material that is deemed “harmful to children”. Proponents of the law, including Sanders, said the law was put in place to “protect children” from “obscene” material.

“Act 372 is just common sense: schools and libraries shouldn’t put obscene material in front of our kids,” Sanders said in a statement to KATV-TV. “I will work with Attorney General Griffin to appeal this ruling and uphold Arkansas law.”

Advertisement

The governor signed the bill into law in March 2023, and a coalition of organizations in the state, including the Central Arkansas Library System in Little Rock and the ACLU of Arkansas, challenged it last year, saying the law was vague, overly broad and that the fear of criminal penalties would have a chilling effect on librarians across the state. A federal court temporarily blocked the enforcement of the two sections in question, while the law was being challenged in court.

The two sections that were struck down on Monday had established a criminal misdemeanor for “furnishing a harmful item to a minor”, and would have required local governments to create oversight boards to review challenged material. The organizations opposing the law argued that local officials, at their own discretion, could censor whichever books and material they pleased.

“This is a significant milestone on a long, sometimes rocky road we were obligated to travel after the passage of Act 372,” said Nate Coulter, executive director of the Central Arkansas Library System, in response to Monday’s ruling.

“We took that path to protect our librarians from prosecution for doing their jobs and to prevent some local elected officials from censoring library books they did not feel were ‘appropriate’ for our patrons to read.”

skip past newsletter promotion
Advertisement

In 2004, a federal judge struck down a similar law. The year prior, the state passed a law that required booksellers and librarians to hide materials deemed “harmful to minors”. It was deemed unconstitutional after legal challenges.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending