Connect with us

Science

Senate Ratifies Pact to Curb a Broad Category of Potent Greenhouse Gases

Published

on

Senate Ratifies Pact to Curb a Broad Category of Potent Greenhouse Gases

WASHINGTON — The Senate voted on Wednesday to approve a world local weather treaty for the primary time in 30 years, agreeing in a uncommon bipartisan deal to section out of the usage of planet-warming industrial chemical substances generally present in fridges and air-conditioners.

By a vote of 69 to 27 the US joined the 2016 Kigali Modification, together with 137 different nations which have agreed to sharply cut back the manufacturing and use of hydrofluorocarbons, or HFCs. The chemical substances are potent greenhouse gases, warming the planet with 1,000 instances the heat-trapping power of carbon dioxide.

Senator Chuck Schumer of New York, the bulk chief, referred to as the ratification “a historic step ahead to combating international warming in an enormous method.” He predicted that the vote might rely as one of the necessary bipartisan accomplishments throughout this Congress. Twenty-one Republicans joined all current members of the Democratic caucus to approve the treaty, together with Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the minority chief.

“Ratifying the Kigali Modification, together with passing the Inflation Discount Act, is the strongest one-two punch in opposition to local weather change any Congress has ever taken,” Mr. Schumer mentioned, referring to final month’s passage of the nation’s first main local weather change legislation, which pumps $370 billion into increasing wind and photo voltaic vitality and electrical autos.

If the Kigali pact is efficiently carried out, scientists estimate it could forestall as much as 0.5 levels Celsius, or roughly 1 diploma Fahrenheit, of warming by the tip of this century. At this stage within the planet’s fast warming, each fraction of a level makes a distinction.

Advertisement

Common international temperatures have risen 1.1 levels Celsius in contrast with preindustrial instances. Scientists have mentioned a rise past 1.5 levels Celsius considerably will increase the probability of catastrophic local weather impacts.

On a sensible degree, the vote modifications little in the US as a result of Congress and the Biden administration have already enacted insurance policies to cut back the manufacturing and importation of hydrofluorocarbons in the US by 85 % over the subsequent 15 years, and business has turned to various chemical substances.

However ratification of the treaty, which the US helped to safe within the waning days of the Obama administration, carries symbolic weight and provides momentum at a time of heightened motion on local weather change in Washington.

“This treaty exhibits that it’s not hopeless to resolve local weather change,” mentioned Durwood Zaelke, president of the Institute for Governance & Sustainable Growth, a Washington-based analysis and advocacy group.

Mr. Zaelke mentioned the method of curbing a greenhouse fuel by way of a comparatively slim sector of the economic system, on this case refrigeration and air-conditioning, may very well be a template for future agreements. “It exhibits the way in which ahead by taking a chunk out of the local weather downside,” he mentioned.

The vote got here on a day when President Biden advised the United Nations Normal Meeting that the US would proceed to press forward with local weather motion, reversing 4 years of stagnation beneath President Donald J. Trump. Underneath Mr. Trump, the US turned the one nation to withdraw from the 2015 Paris Settlement, the worldwide pact supposed to cut back planet-warming fossil gas air pollution.

Advertisement

“From the day I got here to workplace, now we have led with a daring local weather agenda,” Mr. Biden advised the meeting in New York, noting that he rejoined the Paris Settlement and brokered a dedication final 12 months amongst nations representing 65 % of world G.D.P. to restrain common international temperature rise.

After passage final month of the Inflation Discount Act, Senate ratification of the Kigali settlement offers Mr. Biden one other instance to assuage world leaders skeptical about whether or not the US can observe by way of on its local weather pledges.

The Kigali settlement was an modification to the Montreal Protocol, the landmark 1987 treaty designed to restore the ozone layer by banning coolants referred to as chlorofluorocarbons, or CFCs, that have been thinning the layer. The ozone is part of the Earth’s environment that absorbs dangerous ultraviolet mild from the solar.

Chemical corporations responded to the 1987 settlement by growing HFCs, which don’t hurt the ozone layer however have turned out to be a major driver of world warming. Greater than a dozen states have both banned or restricted HFCs.

Lowering HFCs turned the bizarre local weather coverage to earn assist from each the environmental group and business and commerce teams that usually struggle local weather measures. These embody the Nationwide Affiliation of Producers, the American Chemistry Council and the US Chamber of Commerce.

Advertisement

Many American producers had a enterprise incentive to assist the modification. Underneath the pact, nations that don’t ratify the modification can have restricted entry to increasing worldwide markets beginning in 2033.

Some Republicans from states with many chemical producers supported the Kigali deal.

Senator John Kennedy, Republican of Louisiana, teamed with Senator Tom Carper, the Delaware Democrat who leads the Senate Surroundings Committee, to name for approval of the pact.

“Ratification of the Kigali Modification will additional open up international markets to American-made merchandise and can enable the federal authorities to additional forestall unlawful Chinese language dumping of HFCs in the US, which hurts U.S. companies,” the senators wrote in an announcement this 12 months.

In 2020 Congress handed the American Innovation and Manufacturing Act, which directs the Environmental Safety Company to set new guidelines on HFCs, which start to take impact this 12 months, and can regularly cut back the manufacturing and importation of hydrofluorocarbons in the US by 85 % over the next 15 years.

Advertisement

About 15 % of HFCs would nonetheless be permitted as a result of they’ve essential makes use of for which options don’t but exist. Underneath the Kigali Modification, industrialized nations like the US and people within the European Union will cut back manufacturing and consumption of HFCs to about 15 % of 2012 ranges by 2036.

A lot of the remainder of the world, together with China, Brazil and all of Africa, will freeze HFC use by 2024, decreasing it to twenty % of 2021 ranges by 2045.

The Senate accredited a Republican modification to categorise China as a developed nation, which might put it on the identical HFC phaseout timetable as different developed nations, eradicating any aggressive benefit it could have over American producers. It directs the secretary of state to suggest that change at a future assembly of the signatories to the Montreal Protocol.

A small group of the world’s hottest nations — like Bahrain, India, Pakistan, Iran, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait — have essentially the most lenient schedule, freezing HFC use by 2028 and decreasing it to about 15 % of 2025 ranges by 2047.

Republicans who opposed the pact argued that these provisions created an unequal enjoying subject for American corporations.

Advertisement

Senator John Barrasso of Wyoming, the rating Republican on the Senate Power Committee, who supported the 2020 legislation requiring a brand new home HFC regulation, voted in opposition to ratification. “There is no such thing as a excuse for any senator to provide China a handout on the expense of the American taxpayer and American hardworking households,” he mentioned in a speech on the Senate flooring earlier than the vote.

Individuals for Prosperity, a political motion committee based by the billionaire Koch brothers, despatched a letter to lawmakers final week saying that ratifying the Kigali Modification could be an “abdication of U.S. sovereignty over environmental regulation” to the United Nations. The group additionally argued it could elevate the worth of air-conditioning, refrigeration and industrial cooling for American shoppers.

However Francis Dietz, a spokesman for the Air-Conditioning, Heating and Refrigeration Institute, an business commerce group, disputed that. He mentioned the phase-down of HFCs was taking place, it doesn’t matter what the Senate did concerning the formal treaty ratification.

“We’ve been getting ready for this for greater than a decade,” he mentioned, including, “In the event you’re a shopper, this isn’t going to make any distinction to you in any respect.”

Emily Cochrane contributed reporting.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Science

Deadly overdoses fell in U.S. for first time in five years, new estimates show

Published

on

Deadly overdoses fell in U.S. for first time in five years, new estimates show

Deaths from drug overdoses fell last year in the United States as fewer people lost their lives to fentanyl and other opioids, marking the first time the death toll had dropped in five years, according to newly released estimates from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Federal officials said the numbers show a 3% decline in the estimated overdose fatalities between 2022 and 2023. That downturn equates to nearly 3,500 fewer deaths across the U.S. than the year before.

The new figures are tentative and could still be updated. Even a slight decline could be a balm for a country where drug overdoses have taken a devastating toll: In one survey, more than 40% of adults said they knew someone who lost their life to a drug overdose, according to a Rand study published this year.

“I’m thrilled that there wasn’t an increase, but we’re still talking about 107,000 people dying, which is completely unacceptable,” said Beau Kilmer, co-director of the Rand Drug Policy Research Center. Kilmer said better data on drug use are needed to untangle exactly what is driving the changes.

Advertisement

Community groups and health officials grappling with the devastating toll of fentanyl have pushed to equip more people with naloxone, a medicine that can stop opioid overdoses and is commonly sold as a nasal spray under the brand name Narcan. Los Angeles County officials, for instance, credited an effort to hand out Narcan on the streets when they announced last week that overdose deaths had stopped surging among homeless people. To try to reduce the deadly risks, people who use drugs have also turned to test strips to detect fentanyl and avoided using drugs by themselves, among other strategies.

Health researchers have also noted that broader changes in the population could be affecting the numbers: Many heroin users who switched to fentanyl have died, and if fewer people are newly turning to fentanyl use, that could mean fewer people are now at risk, said Dr. Daniel Ciccarone, a UCSF addiction medicine professor.

“Based on utterly anecdotal, street-level observations, I’ll say there aren’t a lot of newbies,” Ciccarone said. “We’re looking for them, but we don’t see them. We don’t see the 22-year-old who says, ‘Hey, I want to use fentanyl.’ This is an aging cohort.”

Even as U.S. deaths linked to fentanyl and other opioids dropped between 2022 and 2023, the country saw an uptick in deaths tied to stimulants such as methamphetamine and cocaine, according to the new estimates. Drug researchers said that in recent years, many deaths involving meth have also involved opioids.

And not all parts of the country saw an overall drop in fatal overdoses. “In the East Coast and in the Midwest, we are seeing declines, but on the West Coast — particularly in the upper Northwest — we’re still seeing increases,” said Farida Ahmad, a health scientist at the National Center for Health Statistics.

Advertisement

The federal figures show that in California, the estimated number of overdose deaths continued to rise in 2023 compared with 2022, increasing by 4.1%. In Oregon and Washington, increases were significantly steeper — roughly 30% and 27% respectively.

Drug use can differ from region to region, shaping ensuing overdoses and deaths: Fentanyl hit the eastern U.S. before spreading west, and methamphetamine use generally has been more common on the West Coast.

Ciccarone lamented that the West Coast should have been better prepared for fentanyl after seeing it hit other parts of the country years earlier, calling it a “failure of public policy.”

“We saw this coming. So why didn’t we prepare for it better?”

Ciccarone credited states in the Midwest and East Coast that had seen notable decreases in overdose deaths, saying that although the exact reasons are unclear, there has been a panoply of efforts that could play a role, including ramping up naloxone distribution and easing access to buprenorphine to treat opioid addiction.

Advertisement

“These are places that were hard hit by fentanyl,” Ciccarone said. “So they’re doing something right.”

The federal estimates released Wednesday do not detail how many deaths linked to methamphetamine also involved other drugs, a phenomenon that has gained growing attention as American mix drugs both knowingly and unknowingly.

Researchers drawing on both federal and local data have found substantial overlap in methamphetamine and opioid use: In L.A. County, for instance, a recent report indicated that in 2022, nearly half of overdose deaths among homeless people involved both methamphetamine and fentanyl.

People who use fentanyl may turn to stimulants for energy to get themselves through daily activities, said Chelsea Shover, an assistant professor at UCLA’s David Geffen School of Medicine. For those facing the dangers of living outside, “you know what helps you stay up at night and stay vigilant? Meth.”

Shover said in recent years, national data have consistently shown the majority of methamphetamine deaths also involve opioids. Those findings were echoed in local research by Shover and other researchers, which found that between 2012 and mid-2021, the bulk of meth-related deaths in L.A. County also involved other drugs or medical conditions, rather than being driven solely by the stimulant.

Advertisement

To help prevent such deaths, “we need to keep doing what we’re doing for opioid-related deaths — because a lot of meth-involved deaths are also opioid-involved,” Shover said.

Scholars have also urged more attention to methamphetamine itself: As it stands, there are no medications approved by the Food and Drug Administration to treat addiction to meth, although some existing medicines have shown promising results, as has offering incentives such as gift cards for people to stay off stimulants.

“The massive investment in reducing overdose deaths has been almost exclusively targeted to opioids,” said Steven Shoptaw, director of the UCLA Center for Behavioral and Addiction Medicine. “There’s been no systematic investment to reduce methamphetamine deaths” — a lapse that Shoptaw said had hindered effective interventions from being widely adopted.

Americans have been eager for any signs of hope amid the overdose crisis, but experts have cautioned against declaring victory too soon in reaction to year-to-year changes in overdose deaths.

For instance, University of Pittsburgh researchers found that the last time fatal overdoses dropped nationally in 2018, the downturn coincided with stricter regulations in China on carfentanil, a highly potent synthetic opioid. The following year, deaths from drug overdoses rose again.

Advertisement

Dr. Donald Burke said that the estimated number of overdose deaths in 2023 was still above the level that researchers had forecast, based on the historic trajectory of such fatalities. The death numbers had jumped higher than expected during the COVID-19 pandemic, Burke said — and may just be returning to the same levels that would have happened in its absence.

“You can make a case that it’s come down, but it’s come down because the COVID impact is less now,” said Burke, dean emeritus of the University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health.

“Without knowing what are the drivers, it’s really hard to tell whether a reduction is a return to the expected trajectory or some other change,” said Dr. Hawre Jalal, an associate professor at the University of Ottawa who has partnered with Burke on such research.

Ciccarone was reluctant to even characterize the newly released estimates as a decrease in overdose deaths, instead referring to “a flattening of the curve.”

“Can we sing hosannas over that? No,” Ciccarone said. “We’re still fighting. We still have a lot of work to do to bend this overdose curve down.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Science

Despite its 'nothingburger' reputation, COVID-19 remains deadlier than the flu

Published

on

Despite its 'nothingburger' reputation, COVID-19 remains deadlier than the flu

Since the earliest days of the pandemic, health officials have gauged the threat of COVID-19 by comparing it to the flu.

At first, it wasn’t even close. People hospitalized in 2020 with the then-novel respiratory disease were five times more likely to die of their illness than were patients who had been hospitalized with influenza during the preceding flu seasons.

Immunity from vaccines and past coronavirus infections has helped tame COVID-19 to the point that when researchers compared the mortality rates of hospitalized COVID-19 and seasonal influenza patients during the height of the 2022-23 flu season, they found that the pandemic disease was only 61% more likely to result in death.

Now the same researchers have analyzed data for the the fall and winter of 2023 and 2024. Dr. Ziyad Al-Aly, director of the Clinical Epidemiology Center at the VA St. Louis Health Care System, and his colleagues expected to find that the two respiratory diseases had finally equalized.

Advertisement

“There’s a narrative out there that the pandemic is over, that it’s a nothingburger,” Al-Aly said. “We came into this thinking we would do this rematch and find it would be like the flu from now on.”

The VA team examined electronic health records of patients treated in Veterans Affairs hospitals in all 50 states between Oct. 1 and March 27. They zeroed in on patients who were admitted because they had fevers, shortness of breath or other symptoms due to either COVID-19 or influenza. (People who were admitted for another reason, such as a heart attack, and were then found to have a coronavirus infection weren’t included in the analysis.)

The COVID-19 patients were a little older, on average, than the flu patients (73.9 versus 70.2 years old), and they were less likely to be current or former smokers. They were also more likely to have received at least three doses of COVID-19 vaccine and less likely to have shunned the shots altogether.

Yet after Al-Aly and his colleagues accounted for these differences and a host of other factors, they found that 5.7% of the COVID-19 patients died of their disease, compared with 4.2% of the influenza patients.

In other words, the risk of death from COVID-19 was still 35% greater than it was for the flu. The findings were published Wednesday in the Journal of the American Medical Assn.

Advertisement

“There is undeniably an impression out there that [COVID-19] is no longer a major threat to human health,” Al-Aly said. “I think it’s largely driven by opinion and an emotional itch to move beyond the pandemic, to put it all behind us. We want to believe that it’s like the flu, and we did — until we saw the data.”

Dr. Peter Chin-Hong, an infectious diseases specialist at UC San Francisco, said the study results are right in line with what he sees in his hospital.

“COVID continues to make some people in our community very ill and die — even in 2024,” he said. “Although most will not get seriously ill from COVID, for some people it is like 2020 all over again.”

That’s particularly true for people who are older, who haven’t received their most recent recommended COVID-19 booster, and who haven’t taken full advantage of antivirals such as Paxlovid. Chin-Hong noted that only 5% of the COVID-19 patients in the study had been treated with antivirals before they were hospitalized.

Even if the mortality rates for the COVID-19 and flu patients had been equal, COVID-19 would still be the bigger health threat because it is sending more people to the hospital, Al-Aly said.

Advertisement

Between Oct. 1 and the end of March, 75.5 out of every 100,000 Americans had been hospitalized with influenza, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. During that same period, the hospitalization rate for COVID-19 was 122.9 per 100,000 Americans, the CDC says.

“COVID still carries a higher risk of hospitalization,” Al-Aly said. “And among those hospitalized, more will die as a result.”

Yet Al-Aly noted with frustration that while 48% of adults in the U.S. received a flu shot this year, only 21% of adults are up to date with their COVID-19 vaccinations, according to the CDC.

Chin-Hong added that more than 95% of adults hospitalized with COVID-19 this past fall and winter had not received the latest booster shot, according to the CDC.

Considering all the tools available to prevent hospitalizations and deaths — and especially the fact that they are readily available to patients in the VA system — the 35% relative risk of death from COVID-19 compared with the flu was “surprisingly high,” Chin-Hong said.

Advertisement

And it’s not like the flu is a trivial health threat, especially for senior citizens and people who are immunocompromised. It routinely kills tens of thousands of Americans each year, CDC data show.

“Influenza is a consequential infection,” Al-Aly said. “Even when COVID becomes equal to the flu, it’s still sobering and significant.”

The researchers also compared the mortality rates of VA COVID-19 patients before and after Dec. 24, when the Omicron subvariant known as JN.1 became the dominant strain in the United States. The difference was not statistically significant.

In just the last two weeks, JN.1 appears to have been overtaken by one of its descendants, a subvariant known as KP.2. It’s part of a family of subvariants that’s taken on the nickname “FLiRT,” a moniker that references some of the mutations that have cropped up on the viruses’ spike proteins.

So far, there’s no indication that KP.2 is any more dangerous than JN.1, Al-Aly said.

Advertisement

“Are the hospitals filling up? No,” he said. “Are ER rooms all over the country flooded with respiratory illness? No.” Nor are there worrying changes in the amount of coronavirus detected in wastewater.

“When you look at all these data streams, we’re not seeing ominous signs that KP.2 is something the general public should worry about,” Al-Aly said.

It’s also too early to tell whether KP.2 — or whatever comes after it — will finally erase the mortality gap between COVID-19 and the flu, he added.

“Maybe when we do a rematch in 2025, that will be the case,” he said.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Science

What you need to know about the bird flu outbreak, concerns about raw milk, and more

Published

on

What you need to know about the bird flu outbreak, concerns about raw milk, and more

There is a bird flu outbreak going on. Here is what you need to know about it:

What is bird flu?

Bird flu is what’s known as a highly pathogenic avian influenza virus. The “highly pathogenic” part refers to birds, which the virus is pretty adept at killing. In virology speak, the virus is of the Influenza A type, and is called H5N1. The “H” stands for the protein Hemagglutinin (HA), of which there are 16 subtypes (H1-H16). The “N” is short for Neuraminidase (NA), of which there are 9 subtypes (N1-N9). There are many possible combinations of HA and NA proteins. The two known type A human influenza viruses are H1N1 and H3N2. (Two additional subtypes, H17N10 and H18N11, have been identified in bats).

When did this bird flu first appear?

The current strain of H5N1 circulating the globe originated in 1996, in farmed geese living in China’s Guangdong province. It quickly spread to other poultry and migrating birds. By the early 2000s, it had spread across southern Asia. By 2005, it was observed in the Middle East, Africa and Europe. In 2014, it showed up in North America, but appeared to peter out here while it still raged in Europe, the Middle East and Africa. In 2021, it showed up in wild birds migrating off Canada’s Atlantic coast. Since then, it has spread across North and South America.

What kinds of animals does bird flu effect?

Birds are the primary carriers and victims of the virus. Across the globe, hundreds of millions of wild and domestic birds have died. Since 2021, hundreds of U.S. poultry farms have had to “depopulate” millions of birds after becoming infected, presumably from sick, migrating wild birds. The virus is highly contagious among birds and has a nearly 100% fatality rate. Mammals, too have been infected and died. In most cases, these are scavenging or predatory animals that ate sick birds — and the virus has died in these animals and not become contagious between them. So far, 48 species of mammals have become infected. However, there have been a few cases in which it appears the virus may have spread between mammals, including on European fur farms, on a few South American beaches where elephant seals came to roost, and now among dairy cattle in the United States.

Can humans get bird flu?

Since 2003, when the virus first started spreading through southern Asia, there have been 868 cases of human infection with H5N1 reported, of which 457 were fatal — a 53% case fatality rate. There have been only two cases in the U.S. In 2022, a poultry worker was infected in Colorado and suffered only mild symptoms, including fatigue. In 2024, a dairy worker was infected in Texas and complained only of conjunctivitis, or pink eye.

Advertisement

Why is everyone paying attention to dairy cows?

On March 25, 2024, officials announced that dairy cows in Texas had been infected with bird flu. Since then, the virus has been found in 36 herds across nine states. There are no known cases in California. It is believed that there was a single introduction of the virus from wild bird exposure (either by passive exposure, or maybe from eating contaminated feed), that probably occurred in December in Texas. The virus has since been detected in milk. A study conducted by federal researchers found that 1 in 5 milk samples collected from retail stores had the virus. It is believed that the virus may be passing between cows and that there may be cows that show no symptoms. For the most part, it seems dairy cows only suffer mild illness when infected, and milk production slows. They clear the virus after a few weeks.

Is it safe to drink milk?

Yes — if it is pasteurized milk. Federal officials say the virus they have detected in pasteurized milk samples is inactive and will not cause disease. In the case of raw milk, they urge people to avoid it. That’s because they have found high viral loads in raw milk samples. In addition, studies of barn cats that have consumed raw milk have reported severe consequences. In one cluster of 24 barn cats, half of them died after consuming raw milk, with others suffering blindness, neurological distress and copious nasal discharge. The virus has not been found in sour cream or cottage cheese.

What’s the situation with wastewater?

As health officials and researchers scramble to understand how widespread avian flu is in cattle and the environment, they are analyzing municipal wastewater. One team from Emory University and Stanford University looked at 190 wastewater treatment sites in 41 states. They found a surge of Influenza A virus in the last several weeks at 59 sites. This does not necessarily mean there is bird flu at these sites. However, in places where the team has gone to investigate — including three in Texas where they knew there was H5N1 in dairy cattle — they have found bird flu. Influenza A is generally seasonal in humans — peaking from late fall to early spring. The surge the researchers noticed — including at several sites in California — started after the flu season had died down. Researchers in Texas have also detected H5N1 in the wastewater of nine of 10 cities they tested, all located in Texas. The CDC is also monitoring for Influenza A at roughly 600 sites across the nation.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending