Connect with us

Politics

The ex-Hollywood filmmaker bankrolling a far-right political revolt in rural California

Published

on

Reverge Anselmo, a former U.S. Marine, former novelist, ex-filmmaker, former vintner and guardian of an unlimited fortune, deserted his beautiful Shasta County property in 2014 in a huff. He’d been battling the county over, amongst different issues, his choice to assemble a Catholic chapel with out full permits on his winery, and after a authorized setback determined to pack it in.

“It was time to go,” Anselmo stated, livid that officers have been in his view wrongly interfering along with his land-use rights. “Who fights their approach into Shasta County? Who does that?”

Then, in 2021, Anselmo discovered that far-right activists have been making a documentary about efforts to recall Shasta County elected officers. He summoned the movie crew to his household dwelling in Greenwich, Conn. — the one he calls “Marie Antoinette’s home” as a result of it’s modeled after the Palace of Versailles — and commenced contributing to their efforts.

On Feb. 1, Shasta County voters shocked the state’s political institution by tossing Republican Supervisor Leonard Moty, a former police chief, on expenses that he wasn’t conservative sufficient. The recall backers — a populist coalition that features anti-mask dad and mom, enterprise house owners, California secessionists and militia members — say they’re simply getting began. They plan to take management of the county by successful extra Shasta posts within the June elections, whereas exporting their confrontational mannequin to different communities nationwide.

Advertisement

Many Democrats and mainstream Republicans are aghast, fearful that far-right activists are making ready to reorder Northern California and different rural components of the state.

“You will see extra recall efforts going down on the native authorities stage,” Republican political marketing consultant Mike Madrid warned throughout a radio interview final month. “Militia-style, white nationalist efforts designed to close down native public companies as the best way to begin spreading social disruption. … It’s occurring already in all places.”

And certainly, simply days after the election, militia members hanging out at Woody Clendenen’s barbershop within the city of Cottonwood have been speaking a couple of latest Zoom name with activists planning a recall in Nevada County. Folks in different counties, together with San Joaquin, have additionally gotten in contact for recommendation, in accordance with Carlos Zapata, one of many recall backers.

Amid all of the cheering and handwringing, few have targeted on the truth that the Shasta County election had one thing few different campaigns can rely on — a quixotic Connecticut-bred cowboy with a grudge and bottomless pockets with which to fund his political revenge.

Anselmo has poured greater than $550,000 into native Shasta County races since 2020, a document for a single particular person, in accordance with county officers.

Advertisement

As well as, county officers suspect Anselmo contributed extra “darkish” funds to the slickly produced “Crimson, White and Blueprint” documentary launched by far-right activists. Contributions to that effort should not public, regardless of a grievance to the state Truthful Political Practices Fee, however in an interview, Anselmo cheerfully confirmed the suspicion, including that after he obtained concerned, “I attempted to get them higher music.”

Subscribers get early entry to this story

We’re providing L.A. Occasions subscribers first entry to our greatest journalism. Thanks on your assist.

Advertisement

Anselmo added that he’s nowhere close to completed. “I simply despatched extra,” he stated, together with a latest examine for about $180,000. “No person requested for the cash.” He declined to supply particulars about the place the donation was despatched, besides to quip that it might need gone to the “Aggressive Pole-Dancers Assn. Nameless.”

The Republican political institution in Shasta County doesn’t mince phrases about what is going on to the neighborhood. Over the past 12 months it has been dwelling to threats of violence and civil battle at public conferences, militia members patrolling racial justice rallies with hid weapons, and a minimum of one brawl that left an anti-recall activist with a black eye.

“I’m watching a county collapse,” stated Supervisor Mary Rickert, a rancher and grandmother of six who was initially focused for recall however granted a reprieve when not sufficient signatures have been gathered. “They wish to take over. They wish to exchange anybody who is aware of the right way to do something with folks that don’t know. I’m actually scared.”

Rickert, like many in Shasta County, has devoted numerous hours to making an attempt to know Anselmo’s psychology. She stated she is mystified that Anselmo appears so decided to assault the federal government of a spot he left way back, particularly when his enterprise was “thriving,” his property “lovely” and his wine “fantastic.”

“Golly sakes, every thing we did we tried to assist him,” added former Supervisor Glenn Hawes, whom Anselmo as soon as sued. Hawes was amongst these in Shasta County who stated he studied Anselmo’s autobiographical film “Stateside” to attempt to achieve perception into his considering. “We may by no means clarify why he did what he did. None of us may.”

Advertisement

In an interview, Anselmo offered a touch at a solution, blaming his land-use struggle for fracturing his marriage.

“She married a cowboy,” he stated of his ex-wife. “And by the point all this occurred, I used to be only a man in cowboy boots screaming on the cellphone to my lawyer all day lengthy. She stated she had no one to experience with anymore. I used to be failing as a husband, nevertheless it wasn’t my fault. Someone needed to go screaming on the cellphone to my lawyer about Shasta County.”

Actress Rachael Leigh Cook dinner and director Reverge Anselmo on the set of the film “Stateside” in 2003 in New York.

(Arnaldo Magnani / Getty Photographs)

Advertisement

By the point Anselmo, 59, arrived in Shasta County in 2005 to embrace a brand new function as a rancher and vintner, he had already lived many lives. In his 20s, he served in Beirut with the U.S. Marines in the course of the bloody Lebanese civil battle. After leaving the navy, he stayed in a monastery and so significantly thought-about changing into a monk that he gave up all his possessions, he stated in a courtroom submitting.

Later, in his 30s, he printed a novel, “The Cadillac of Six-By’s,” primarily based on his fight experiences in Beirut. Then he launched a film profession, producing a lot of movies, together with the autobiographical epic “Stateside,” starring Val Kilmer, a couple of younger man packed off to the Military by his highly effective father after a drunk driving incident.

Anselmo — the son of Rene Anselmo, who based the community that may turn into Univision, and later the primary personal satellite tv for pc broadcast firm — determined to go away Beverly Hills for Crimson State California shortly after some critics panned “Stateside.”

He offered his storybook cottage for about $2 million, in accordance with each property information and an interview, and bought a shocking piece of land, perched upon a hill, with views of each Mt. Shasta and Mt. Lassen.

Anselmo says he selected Shasta County “due to my horse” — an American Racking horse named Cola Bar.

Advertisement

“I had an excellent bond with the horse,” he stated throughout his interview with the movie crew. “So I purchased the ranch. I purchased it in California not as a result of I’m a fan of California, however as a result of I all the time knew that if I needed to do away with it, I may. It’s California, so I can dump it.”

Anselmo added that he did his analysis and discovered that Shasta County didn’t match the Golden State stereotype. The county, whose southern border is greater than 100 miles north of Sacramento, is a spot of cattle ranches unfold throughout rolling inexperienced and brown hills, ribboned with streams and ringed by snow-capped mountains.

The politics among the many fewer than 200,000 residents tilt libertarian and conservative. The county closely favored Donald Trump, and is a cradle of the secessionist Jefferson State motion. Currently, a big militia primarily based within the city of Cottonwood has been patrolling the streets of Redding to “defend” it from protests. Anselmo is a robust supporter of the militia, crediting its members with saving the county seat of Redding from antifa, which he says was “headed” for town “making an attempt to burn it.”

“So I stated, a minimum of I’m not going to need to take care of any craziness up there, so let’s go,” Anselmo defined.

From left, Agnes Bruckner, Val Kilmer, Reverge Anselmo and Rachael Leigh Cook in May 2004.

From left, Agnes Bruckner, Val Kilmer, Reverge Anselmo and Rachael Leigh Cook dinner in Could 2004.

(Jean-Paul Aussenard / Getty Photographs)

Advertisement

In 2005, he integrated an LLC known as Seven Hills Land and Cattle Firm and ultimately bought greater than 1,500 acres close to the hamlet of Shingletown. The unfold included a winery, ranchlands and the glowing waters of Bear Creek, a tributary of the Sacramento River that plummets in a beautiful 200-foot waterfall proper on Anselmo’s property.

Initially, Anselmo’s transfer to Shasta seemed to be a boon for each the county and him. He quickly married a fellow horse fanatic from Texas, and he and his spouse turned native celebrities. Their restaurant turned a gathering place for individuals from all around the county, identified for its free-flowing wines, scrumptious meals and raucous events. Anselmo turned pleasant with highly effective county officers. He was happy with serving to the sheriff seek for unlawful pot grows by conducting flyovers in his personal helicopter.

However nearly instantly, he bumped into issues. What would turn into one of many county’s most costly and long-fought authorized battles arrived on the afternoon of Oct. 15, 2007, within the type of a state water high quality inspector.

Anselmo’s crews had simply accomplished the grape harvest and have been sitting within the glowing afternoon mild celebrating over just a few glasses of wine when, as Anselmo later advised it to a crowd of tea get together activists and in a lawsuit, considered one of his employees burst in with information. “A fish cop” had proven up the place employees have been cleansing up a pasture and ordered them to cease work.

Advertisement

Anselmo left his get together and got here all the way down to see what all of the fuss was about. He quickly encountered inspector Andrew Jensen, who advised him that, in responding to an nameless grievance, he discovered employees stirring up sediment that would stream into the south fork of Bear Creek.

“Inside 24 hours, I discovered myself actually a bond slave to the state of California,” Anselmo later advised his tea get together viewers. “With my again bent over, I’m spreading straw, with armed males telling me what to do.”

The State Water Assets Management Board issued a pretty commonplace order, amongst tons of issued yearly, requiring cleanup and a restoration plan.

Anselmo known as his lawyer. “Me and my attorneys, we fought them for 11 months, six hours a day.” The state water board rescinded its order in August 2008, in accordance with state information, as a result of, it stated, the issue was mounted.

However by then, Anselmo had a brand new antagonist: Shasta County.

Advertisement

Alerted in regards to the grading from the state, the county on Oct. 30, 2007, issued its personal discover of violation.

County officers stated it will have been a easy matter pulling permits to clear it up. That isn’t the plan of action Anselmo selected.

“That’s a stickup,” he stated. “I didn’t owe a advantageous.”

He was satisfied, as he later stated in a lawsuit, that the county had picked up the baton from the state and was now interfering along with his property rights “with none lawful authority.”

Anselmo appealed to Hawes, who was then on the county Board of Supervisors and in addition owned the farm provide retailer the place Anselmo was, in accordance with each males, an excellent buyer. However quite than assist him, Anselmo claimed Hawes insinuated the issue may very well be solved if Anselmo made a contribution to a mitigation financial institution, just like the one Hawes managed.

Advertisement

Hawes denied that he tried to solicit such a contribution, noting that his mitigation financial institution doesn’t even provide these sorts of credit.

The county’s director of useful resource administration additionally turned up, and, in accordance with Anselmo, threatened to carry up certificates of occupancy on his vineyard if he didn’t get a grading allow.

From that time on, Anselmo was at battle.

He filed a lawsuit, ultimately naming the Board of Supervisors and the county’s director of useful resource administration.

Because the lawsuit raged on, Anselmo continued holding dinners and events at his vineyard and flying by the skies searching for pot grows for the sheriff.

Advertisement

However he additionally took his land-use struggle with the county to a brand new enviornment. He utilized for permission to construct a personal chapel at his winery and commenced building. He spared little expense, importing, amongst different issues, bells from Belgium, travertine from Italy and relics from France.

Anselmo, in a lawsuit, describes the chapel as an expression of his deep religion. He characterised himself as “a person of the world, a person of means, and a person of religion as a religious Roman Catholic.”

Our Lady of Seven Sorrows Chapel being built by Reverge Anselmo

Reverge Anselmo’s Our Woman of Seven Sorrows Chapel in Shasta County, because it regarded nearing completion in 2012.

(Andreas Fuhrmann / File Searchlight)

However Shasta officers raised points in regards to the allow and in February 2012 posted a “purple tag” on the chapel. Whereas they have been out on the property, in addition they hung purple tags on a number of different initiatives, together with the workplace of Anselmo’s spouse and his gleaming new eating room, which was a central a part of his occasion enterprise.

Advertisement

Anselmo tore down the purple tags, known as his lawyer and filed a freedom of faith swimsuit in federal courtroom. He accused the county of creating bother about his chapel “as retaliation” due to his earlier lawsuit in regards to the grading.

The tea get together then invited him to talk to a room stuffed with activists. Shortly after that, greater than 200 individuals turned out in entrance of Anselmo’s chapel to protest. “Authorities has been striving to kill the spirit of righteousness for too lengthy,” one protester advised the Redding File Searchlight.

However following that public relations victory, Shasta County officers launched a counterattack, suing Anselmo and looking for injunctions that would shut down his enterprise.

Because the authorized struggle wore on, Anselmo’s private life grew difficult. His mom died, and he and his spouse separated. (She now lives in southern Oregon, the place she owns a mattress and breakfast. She declined to remark.)

Then a choose issued an early ruling in Shasta County’s favor.

Advertisement

In 2014, Anselmo agreed to pay almost $1.4 million to settle with Shasta County. In below a month, he stated, he cut up from his spouse, offered his vineyards and his cattle ranch and moved away.

However he didn’t divest himself of his grudge towards Shasta County. In 2020, he made what’s believed to be the one largest marketing campaign contribution within the historical past of the county — and maybe any California county north of Sacramento — when he gave $100,000 to Patrick Jones, a former Redding mayor who manages his household’s gun retailer and was publicly sympathetic to Anselmo’s battle with the county’s sources division.

By the point Jones took his supervisor seat in January 2021, many of us in Shasta County have been in full-blown revolt towards their authorities over COVID-19 restrictions. The recall was launched quickly after. A lot of the eye targeted on the violent rhetoric and threats at board conferences and the spectacle of an armed militia transferring into electoral politics.

However behind the scenes, Anselmo was on the point of pour in cash that may very well be spent on relentless tv and radio promoting.

Zapata, probably the most antagonistic leaders of the Shasta revolt, stated he thought the recall would have succeeded even with out Anselmo’s contributions — though he was very pleased to have them. “The factor you must perceive is individuals are fed up,” he stated. “To assume {that a} neighborhood wants a billionaire to fund this motion is totally disingenuous.”

Advertisement

On the day the movie crew flew to Connecticut, most of Anselmo’s huge contributions to Shasta County politics hadn’t but are available in. The interviewer requested Anselmo about his horse and about his lengthy feud with the county. After which he posed another question.

“Would I come again? That’s your query?” Anslemo paused, and gestured along with his cigarette. “For those who’re profitable … recall the three supervisors, remove the entire sources administration division … yeah, for those who did that I’d return.”

In his interview with The Occasions, Anselmo was much less decisive. “You don’t have any notions of how raped you’re every day on the market,” he stated of dwelling in California.

However he had no regrets. Of county officers, he stated: “They’re evil, and so they deserve what’s coming to them.”

And of the recall proponents, he added: “The wind is at their backs. They’re going to be free. I don’t say they are going to be affluent, however they are going to be free.”

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Politics

Americans believe US should focus more on domestic issues, but support leadership on world stage: poll

Published

on

Americans believe US should focus more on domestic issues, but support leadership on world stage: poll

Join Fox News for access to this content

You have reached your maximum number of articles. Log in or create an account FREE of charge to continue reading.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

A majority of Americans believe the U.S. should focus more on issues at home and withdraw from foreign affairs, despite an increasing number of Americans believing the U.S. should be more engaged and take the lead when it comes to international events.

Just under two-thirds of Americans, 62%, believe the U.S. would be “better served by withdrawing from international affairs and focusing more attention on problems here at home,” according to the results of the Ronald Reagan Institute’s 2024 summer survey, which was shared exclusively with Fox News Sunday.

Advertisement

Despite that finding, the percentage of Americans who believe it’s important for the U.S. to be more engaged and take the lead in international events is on the rise, up 12 points in the last six months.

A majority, 54%, expressed support for a more engaged U.S. foreign policy, up from 42% in November. The latest figure includes 66% of Democrats and 49% of Republicans.

ZELENSKYY APPEALS FOR AID, INVESTMENT IN ENERGY SECTOR AT UKRAINE RECOVERY CONFERENCE IN BERLIN

Ukrainian servicemen search a target with a U.S. Stinger air defense missile launcher on the front line in Zaporizhzhia region, Ukraine, on May 28, 2024. (AP Photo/Andriy Andriyenko)

“From this year’s Reagan Institute summer survey, we’re seeing an uptick in the numbers of Americans who really want to see and are seeking policies that reflect American leadership in the world, that reflects President Reagan’s principles of leadership, of strength on the global stage when it comes to the chaos and conflict that we’re seeing around the world,” Rachel Hoff, the policy director at the Ronald Reagan Institute, told Fox News Digital.

Advertisement

“The number of Americans seeking American leadership and engagement is at a five-year high,” she added.

Most Americans also said they believe U.S. involvement in international events is beneficial for both the United States (57%) and the world (61%).

Over three-fourths, 78%, of respondents indicated they agree that U.S. leadership and engagement in international affairs is “essential” for boosting the economy and securing favorable trade arrangements.

A similar amount of Americans, 77%, indicated they believe it is important for the U.S. to stand up for human rights and democracy around the world, while 86% indicated it was important for the U.S. to maintain a strong military that can maintain peace and prosperity both at home and around the world.

The poll comes amid continued debate over how involved the U.S. should be in defending Ukraine amid its war with Russia, with some arguing that the billions of dollars spent equipping the Ukrainian military would be better spent on domestic issues.

Advertisement

Down two percent since the same Reagan Institute survey last summer, 57% of Americans said they support sending military aid to Ukraine, compared to 32% who oppose it. Another 11% indicated they were unsure.

Americans also believe it is in the best interest of the U.S. that Ukraine win its conflict against Russia, with 75% saying it is important Ukraine win compared to 17% who indicated it was unimportant. There was no change in those percentages compared to last year’s survey.

Hoffman said the Reagan Institute’s data on Ukraine has stayed “remarkably consistent over time.”

“So we started asking questions about Ukraine, about American support and military aid for Ukraine’s efforts in their war against the Russian invasion, and those numbers have not shifted at all since 2022,” she said.

“Even with all the debate and discussion that we’re seeing in the media and on Capitol Hill about aid to Ukraine and the really important conversations that policy leaders are having, it’s really important to remember and recognize that the American people, in the middle of all those conversations, have made clear that they want to continue supporting America’s allies and our friends around the world that are standing up against aggression… and they want to do that by sending U.S. military aid to Ukraine.”

Advertisement

ISRAELI-DEPLOYED AI IN GAZA LIKELY HELPS IDF REDUCE CIVILIAN CASUALTIES, EXPERT SAYS

Israel-Palestinians

An Israeli soldier attaches an Israeli flag on top of an armored personnel carrier (APC) near Israel’s border with Gaza on April 15, 2024. 

The survey also found that Americans believe Israel — a war-torn country that responded forcefully to the October 7, 2023, invasion by Hamas militants — should be supported by the U.S.

“Both Republicans and Democrats, in large numbers, want to support Israel in its fight against the Hamas terrorists in the Middle East,” Hoff said.

A majority of Americans, 56%, said they support sending aid to Israel, compared to 35% who said they oppose the effort. Another 68% said they support the U.S. sending missile defense systems to Israel to “help it defend against” drone or missile attacks.

“I think the more we drill down into what the American people want our government to be doing to support our allies and friends around the world, to push back on tyranny and terrorism and to support those fighting for freedom and democracy, those numbers only rise,” Hoff said.

Advertisement

Fifty-five percent of those surveyed also said they would support an Israeli counterattack against continued Iranian aggression, while 31% said they would oppose it.

Three-quarters of Americans, 75%, said they were concerned about humanitarian conditions in Gaza.

Seventy-four percent said they believe Israel’s war with Hamas matters to U.S. security and prosperity, compared to 73% who said the same for Ukraine’s war with Russia.

Americans also indicated concern over Chinese military build-up, with 82% saying they are “extremely” or “somewhat” concerned.

Other findings related to China included concern over the communist nation’s human rights violations (83%), technology theft (83%), overtaking the U.S. as the world’s superpower (75%), and the isolation of Taiwan (68%).

Advertisement

Based off previous Reagan Institute surveys, Hoff said public opinion on China “has been moving and shifting significantly over time” and that there’s an increasing number of Americans who are “seeing China as an adversary.”

“They’re concerned about, technology theft, economic practices, human rights abuses, abuses of the Chinese Communist Party, and they’re concerned about the Chinese military buildup,” she said.

Presidents Xi-and Biden

President Biden meets with Chinese President Xi Jinping on the sidelines of the G20 leaders’ summit in Bali, Indonesia, November 14, 2022. (REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque/File Photo)

A slim majority, 51%, said they believe the social media app TikTok, which is owned by a Chinese company that is closely connected to the Chinese government, should be banned in the U.S. Another 39% percent said they oppose a ban of the app, while 10% said they were unsure.

The survey, which was conducted from May 20 to May 27, sampled 1,257 U.S. adults.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

As California water agency investigates top manager, some worry progress could be stymied

Published

on

As California water agency investigates top manager, some worry progress could be stymied

In the three years that Adel Hagekhalil has led California’s largest urban water supplier, the general manager has sought to focus on adaptation to climate change — in part by reducing reliance on water supplies from distant sources and investing in local water supplies.

His efforts to help shift priorities at the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, which has traditionally focused largely on delivering imported water to the region, have won praise among environmental advocates who hope to reduce dependence on supplies from the Colorado River and Northern California.

However, now that Hagekhalil is under investigation for harassment allegations and has been placed on leave by the MWD board, some of his supporters say they’re concerned that his sidelining might interfere with the policies he has helped advance.

“I would hope this doesn’t mean that we undo the progress that’s been made since Adel came in,” said Conner Everts, executive director of the Southern California Watershed Alliance, who has supported Hagekhalil’s policies.

Aggressive and impactful reporting on climate change, the environment, health and science.

Advertisement

The accusations against Hagekhalil surfaced Thursday while he was traveling in Singapore for a water conference.

Chief Financial Officer Katano Kasaine made the allegations in a confidential letter to the board, which was leaked to the media. She said Hagekhalil has harassed, demeaned and sidelined her and created a hostile work environment.

Hagekhalil denied the accusations, saying he has always treated the staff with respect and professionalism, and that the claims amount to “disagreements on management decisions.”

Advertisement

The MWD board voted to place Hagekhalil on administrative leave for 90 days while Kasaine’s complaint and other allegations are investigated. In his place, the board temporarily appointed assistant general manager Deven Upadhyay, who has been at the agency for 29 years, as interim general manager.

Everts has for more than three decades been advocating for Southern California to reduce reliance on imported water supplies by boosting local supplies. He said he has been pleased to see Hagekhalil and MWD moving forward with plans for the country’s largest wastewater recycling facility in Carson, and working to develop a plan for adapting to climate change.

Everts said he hopes that whatever results emerge from the investigations, the agency doesn’t revert to an outmoded focus on imported water that he believes some “old guard” leaders of MWD still favor.

Everts, like many others who spoke at Thursday’s board meeting, said the accusations demand a fair and impartial investigation.

“Hopefully, Adel comes back and continues to lead in this direction. And if not, whoever would step in would do that,” Everts said. “Does the culture change of the agency continue to progress? That’s my question.”

Advertisement

MWD is the nation’s largest wholesale supplier of drinking water, serving cities and agencies that supply 19 million people across Southern California.

MWD Board Chair Adán Ortega Jr. said that while the board made “difficult decisions” regarding the allegations against Hagekhalil, “we maintain our commitment to the policies and direction of this organization.”

Ortega said he doesn’t expect any change in the district’s “current policy course.”

“Our task at hand is tackling climate change,” Ortega said in an interview with The Times. “Anybody that would challenge that is up against a pretty embedded policy framework for tackling climate change.”

Ortega was involved in selecting Hagekhalil, who previously worked for the city of Los Angeles and who was hired after a bitter struggle among board members in 2021. Ortega said his priorities as board chair have been the same priorities that Hagkhalil has been pursuing.

Advertisement

As for the accusations against Hagekhalil, Ortega said he was upset that someone leaked the confidential letter.

“I believe that whoever leaked it was trying to box in the board. But we’re not going to let them, and I don’t think it worked,” Ortega said.

He said all the initiatives that Hagekhalil was working on will continue under Upadhyay while the matters are investigated.

“The board drives the agenda,” he said. “I think the board has been united on things that Adel and I have both shared.”

Hagekhalil has led the agency at a time of major initiatives, including negotiations aimed at addressing water shortages on the Colorado River, plans for building the water recycling plant in Carson, and the MWD board’s consideration of Gov. Gavin Newsom’s plan to build a $20-billion water tunnel in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta.

Advertisement

Some of Hagekhalil’s supporters questioned why the matter was brought to the board while he was traveling, and suggested the public airing of grievances appeared to be aimed at pushing aside a leading advocate for transforming the district’s focus.

But Ortega said any speculation that placing Hagekhalil on leave might derail the MWD’s current policy agenda is unfounded.

“The board is fully organized in support of that agenda,” Ortega said. “So I don’t feel any nervousness or doubt about our continued policy direction.”

“It’s a mistake to think that the fate of our policy agenda rests on one person,” he added. “Nothing is changing in terms of the board’s organization or the items that we’re considering in future months, or the composition of the committees. All of that is intact. And so nothing changes.”

Still, some environmental advocates have said they’re concerned about a potential link between the surfacing of allegations against Hagekhalil and efforts by some within the agency to push for the proposed Delta Conveyance Project, a 45-mile tunnel that would create a second route to draw water from the Sacramento River into the aqueducts of the State Water Project. They pointed out that Kasaine currently serves as treasurer of the Delta Conveyance Design and Construction Authority, the entity that was created to finance the tunnel project.

Advertisement

“I think it is a calculated ambush that is designed to get the tunnel approved, over the objections of other members of the Metropolitan board,” said Patricia Schifferle, director of Pacific Advocates, an environmental consulting firm.

During an MWD committee meeting on Monday, supporters and opponents of the proposed tunnel debated the costs and benefits of the project.

Karla Nemeth, director of the State Department of Water Resources, told board members that the project is essential to improving the reliability of water supplies in the face of climate change, sea-level rise and a major earthquake.

Other supporters made similar arguments, while opponents argued that building the tunnel would harm the delta’s deteriorating ecosystem and would be more expensive than other water-supply alternatives.

The costs would be paid for by urban and agricultural water districts that decide to participate. The state recently released a cost-benefit analysis that is intended to provide information for local water agencies to consider.

Advertisement

The MWD would receive a large share of the water, and the board’s eventual decision on whether to participate is expected to be pivotal in determining whether the state’s plan goes forward.

The MWD board in 2020 agreed to contribute $160.8 million toward planning and pre-construction costs. District officials say the board could consider whether to provide additional funding for planning and pre-construction costs at the end of this year, and it will likely be several years before there is a decision on long-term financial participation.

When the state’s cost-benefit analysis was released last month, Hagekhalil said: “The questions are, how can this project be implemented, what kind of assurances can we have in the resilience it provides to the Delta and our water supply future, and at what price?”

Leaders of several environmental groups said they were disappointed to see Hagekhalil placed on administrative leave before the accusations against him have been investigated.

“It is critically important and appropriate for MWD to take these allegations seriously and we applaud the agency’s decision to investigate the claims made, so that the board can have an accurate understanding of what has been happening among the organization’s senior leadership,” said Bruce Reznik, executive director of the group LA Waterkeeper. “That said, the public needs more information to ensure the complete independence of this review.”

Advertisement

He said any action against Hagekhalil should have come after an independent investigation.

Reznik called Hagekhalil a “visionary, inclusive and transparent leader” who is helping the agency reform its approach to adapt to the effects of climate change.

“He has been vocal about his vision and plans to transform the agency,” Reznik said. “That focus must continue at MWD.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Texas Democratic candidate charged with faking racist comments to himself

Published

on

Texas Democratic candidate charged with faking racist comments to himself

Join Fox News for access to this content

You have reached your maximum number of articles. Log in or create an account FREE of charge to continue reading.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

A Texas political candidate has been arrested on charges of sending fake hate messages to himself on social media.

Taral Patel, the Democratic candidate for Fort Bend Precinct 3 Commissioner, was arrested by Texas Rangers and is being charged with Online Impersonation and Misrepresentation of Identity.

Advertisement

Authorities allege that Patel spent months sending a stream of racist and derogatory comments to himself, impersonating a supporter of incumbent Republican Commissioner Andy Meyers.

DISGRUNTLED ATHLETIC DIRECTOR ACCUSED OF FRAMING PRINCIPAL  WITH AI-GENERATED RACIST, ANTISEMITIC RECORDING

Taral Patel is pictured in the above mugshot. (Fort Bend County Sheriff’s Office)

According to the arrest record for Patel, the investigation was launched in October 2023 after Meyers requested authorities to look into who was responsible for the vitriolic comment made at Patel.

Patel previously posted a collage of hateful comments ostensibly sent by Meyers supporters, claiming the messages represented a “deep and misguided fear” among the Republican Party.

Advertisement

“As your Democratic candidate for County Commissioner, I am always open to criticism of my policy positions and stances on issues,” Patel said in the September 2023 post on Facebook. “However, when my Republican opponents supporters’ decide to hurl racist, anti-immigrant, Hinduphobic, or otherwise disgusting insults at my family, faith community, colleagues, and me – that crosses a line.”

SCAMMERS ARE USING FAKE NEWS, MALICIOUS LINKS TO TARGET YOU IN AN EMOTIONAL FACEBOOK PHISHING TRAP

Andy Meyers

Fort Bend County Commissioner W. A. “Andy” Meyers, Precinct 3, participates in the commissioners’ court meeting on Tuesday, Jan. 8, 2019, in Richmond. (Brett Comer/Houston Chronicle via Getty Images)

Law enforcement reported that Patel used an image of a real Fort Bend resident as his profile picture without the individual’s consent.

Fort Bend County Republican Party Chairman Bobby Eberle released a statement reacting to Patel’s arrest, calling the situation “deeply concerning.” 

“Whether Republican or Democrat, such tactics should be unequivocally condemned by all who value integrity and accountability in politics,” Eberle said. “This is not a partisan issue, and the good people of Fort Bend County should be able to trust that when allegations are made, they are sincere.”

Advertisement

He concluded, “Fort Bend County residents deserve better leadership than someone who will create a fake account and post manufactured racist attacks — attempting to turn neighbor against neighbor — for political gain.”

Continue Reading

Trending