Politics
How New York’s Mayor, Eric Adams, Wooed Donald Trump
Donald J. Trump’s electoral victory alarmed most New York Democrats — but not Eric Adams. For Mr. Adams, the mayor of New York City who had been criminally indicted and faced political isolation, it was a golden opportunity.
In the weeks before the presidential inauguration, Mr. Adams cozied up to Mr. Trump, his political allies and his family.
The mayor called the president-elect on multiple occasions, congratulating him on his election victory and discussing city affairs. He met at a luxury Manhattan hotel with Stephen K. Bannon, Mr. Trump’s ally and former top aide. And he contacted the president’s second son, Eric Trump, who runs the Trump family business.
The previously unreported extent of the charm campaign was recounted in interviews with more than a dozen people knowledgeable about the effort, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the nature of the communications.
The effort culminated in Mr. Adams receiving an in-person meeting with Mr. Trump in Florida just days before the inauguration.
While Mr. Adams did not explicitly raise his corruption case at the Florida meeting, the people said, Mr. Trump appeared sympathetic to the mayor’s legal plight. The president-elect, on the verge of attaining the power to make the mayor’s case disappear, lamented that the Justice Department under President Joseph R. Biden Jr. was “weaponized.”
Mr. Adams has said that he was there on city business, and that his outreach to Mr. Trump was normal political bridge-building, irrelevant to his criminal case. A City Hall spokeswoman noted he was not the only Democrat who has sought to find some common ground with Mr. Trump.
“Mayor Adams wants to work with the new president, and not war with him, to better the lives of New Yorkers,” Liz Garcia, the city hall spokeswoman, said in a statement. “There is no difference between how the mayor has approached his relationship with President Trump and how he approached his relationship with former President Biden. Any claim that he has anything but a professional relationship with President Trump is based in falsehood.”
Yet their in-person meeting sealed a connection between the two men and was a prelude to the mayor’s lawyers formally asking the Trump administration to abandon the case.
Less than a month after their meeting, Mr. Trump’s Justice Department ordered federal prosecutors in Manhattan to seek a dismissal of the indictment, arguing that it hindered Mr. Adams’s cooperation with the administration’s immigration crackdown. The department also claimed the corruption case would interfere in this year’s mayoral election. It left open the possibility of reviving the charges after November.
That striking move to drop the case — which prompted several Justice Department resignations last month and a political crisis in New York — reflected a changed reality for the American justice system as the president has begun to demolish the wall between prosecution and politics.
The mayor’s case offers a blueprint for fighting criminal charges in this new, transactional era: flatter Mr. Trump, forge a personal connection and, when possible, support his agenda.
Both sides stood to gain: Mr. Adams might well have secured his freedom, while Mr. Trump gained a friend in City Hall, someone to support elements of his immigration crackdown — and, potentially, his family business.
That business, the Trump Organization, played a role in the mayor’s in-person meeting with Mr. Trump.
For one thing, the meeting was held at a Trump Organization property, a golf club in West Palm Beach, Fla. And it came about after Frank Carone, the mayor’s trusted outside adviser and former chief of staff, contacted Eric Trump, two people with knowledge of the matter said. The two men became acquainted when Mr. Carone was in City Hall in New York and the Trump Organization was operating a golf course on city land.
The Florida meeting also came as the Trump Organization was bidding on a New York City contract to operate a Central Park skating rink, according to people with knowledge of the matter.
There is no indication that the mayor’s office has advocated for the Trump Organization. But the situation is awkward nonetheless as the city’s Department of Parks and Recreation must evaluate a business owned by a family to which Mr. Adams is seemingly indebted.
Mr. Adams, his spokeswoman said, has not discussed the bid with the parks agency, which she said will follow its standard procedure.
She also disputed that Mr. Adams, who has offered mild pushback on some of the most polarizing Trump administration actions, was indebted to the president. The mayor, who has maintained his innocence, has said he never discussed his case with Mr. Trump, and has repeatedly denied that he promised anything in exchange for dropping it.
Mr. Trump, who has played down the significance of the charges, has nonetheless denied having had anything to do with his Justice Department’s abandonment of the case.
For the president, any political gain from the case disappearing might be fleeting. The appearance of a backroom deal playing out in public has damaged the mayor’s re-election prospects, potentially limiting his usefulness to the president.
Moreover, the federal judge overseeing the case might not approve the Justice Department’s plan to revisit the charges after the mayoral race.
Paul D. Clement, a prominent lawyer who the judge tasked with offering an independent recommendation on the case, warned that the arrangement could give the impression that the Trump administration was threatening the mayor with the specter of a revived case.
It could create the appearance, Mr. Clement wrote, “that the actions of a public official are being driven by concerns about staying in the good graces of the federal executive, rather than the best interests of his constituents.”
The judge has already delayed Mr. Adams’s trial, once set for April. Mr. Clement recommended that the judge dismiss the case entirely.
Building a Connection
In late October, a month after he was indicted, the mayor held a briefing for reporters ahead of Mr. Trump’s election rally at Madison Square Garden. He was asked whether he agreed with other Democrats who had called the former president a fascist.
Mr. Adams, who a few years earlier had characterized Mr. Trump as a “complete embarrassment to our nation,” leaned forward, his hands clasped in front of him. “My answer is no,” he said, adding, “I think we could all dial down the temperature.”
Mr. Trump soon won the election, and returned to New York, and the Garden, for a victory lap. This time, the event was an Ultimate Fighting Championship bout, where Mr. Adams approached the president-elect at his ringside seat, striking up a brief, friendly conversation.
Those episodes were early signs of compatibility between the two men. In subsequent months, they bonded over their views on immigration. Unlike other big city Democratic mayors, Mr. Adams has pledged to work with the president to target immigrants who have committed crimes, though local sanctuary laws have thus far prevented him from cooperating fully.
They also shared a sense of grievance against the justice system.
Last year, Mr. Trump became the first former and future president to be convicted of a crime and Mr. Adams became the first New York City mayor in modern history to be indicted.
Mr. Trump was convicted of falsifying business records related to a sex scandal. Federal prosecutors in Manhattan accused Mr. Adams of soliciting illegal foreign campaign donations and accepting thousands of dollars’ worth of travel benefits in exchange for helping Turkish officials open a new consulate building.
After Mr. Trump’s electoral victory, Mr. Adams began calling him, according to people with knowledge of the conversations. In an initial call, he congratulated Mr. Trump on his election victory and on subsequent calls discussed city business, though the people declined to elaborate on the business that was discussed. Mr. Adams did not raise his case on the calls, the people said.
In December, as their connection strengthened, Mr. Trump told reporters he would consider pardoning Mr. Adams, contending that the mayor had been treated “pretty unfairly” by federal prosecutors.
Asked about the president-elect’s comments at the time, Mr. Adams deferred to his legal team, saying, “I have an attorney that is going to look at every avenue to ensure I get justice.”
Soon after, Mr. Adams’s defense team learned of a troubling development. According to court filings, a “credible source” on Dec. 22 told Mr. Adams’s lawyer Alex Spiro that a grand jury was hearing testimony related to a potential new charge.
Around this time, Mr. Adams appears to have stepped up his outreach to Mr. Trump’s circle of supporters. That included turning to Mr. Bannon — a hard-right provocateur who was hardly a natural touch point for a Democratic mayor. But Mr. Bannon, too, had once faced charges brought by the Manhattan federal prosecutors’ office, and he had been represented by Mr. Spiro.
Weeks before the inauguration, after Mr. Spiro helped to connect them, the mayor met with Mr. Bannon at the Pierre Hotel on Fifth Avenue, according to people with knowledge of the encounter. Mr. Adams did not mention his case, one of the people said, but they discussed a potential mayoral primary against former Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo.
“The mayor did not do anything differently than mayors do during administration changes,” Mr. Spiro said in an emailed statement.
Mr. Adams had other meetings with people in Mr. Trump’s orbit.
A person with knowledge of the matter said that Mr. Carone, the mayor’s political problem-solver, contacted Bruce Blakeman, a Republican and the Nassau County executive. Mr. Adams and Mr. Blakeman then dined together on Long Island in mid-January, after which the mayor said the two men had discussed “the issue of violent gangs in our region.”
In a statement, a spokesman for Mr. Blakeman declined to discuss the specifics of the conversation, saying only that the men “from time to time discuss matters of regional interest.”
As the inauguration approached, the president-elect was not the only Trump family member to receive a call from the mayor. Mr. Adams also contacted Eric Trump, people with knowledge of the previously unreported call said.
It is unclear what they discussed beyond pleasantries, though the people said that Mr. Adams’s case did not come up.
The friendly call reflected a contrast with the Trump Organization’s relationship with the previous mayor, Bill de Blasio. He had sought to oust the company from its Ferry Point golf course — operated on city land in the Bronx — in the aftermath of Trump supporters’ storming of the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.
But in 2022, with Mr. Adams as mayor and Mr. Carone as his chief of staff, the city made two decisions about Ferry Point that were favorable for the Trumps.
It did not appeal a court ruling that allowed the Trump Organization to keep Ferry Point, and it approved the Trumps to host a Saudi Arabia-backed women’s golf tournament there.
Eric Trump later called Mr. Carone to express his appreciation, according to people with knowledge of the previously unreported call. Though Mr. Carone left the Adams administration by early 2023, he and Eric Trump periodically stayed in touch.
Less than a week before the presidential inauguration, Mr. Carone called Eric Trump to arrange the meeting between the mayor and the president-elect.
The younger Trump explained that he was not a formal member of his father’s political operation, but nonetheless offered to connect Mr. Carone with a scheduler for the president-elect.
By the end of that week, Mr. Adams was on his way to Florida.
A Crucial Lunch
The Trump International Golf Club West Palm Beach, the first golf course Mr. Trump acquired, is a sprawling property nestled between an airport and the ocean.
Mr. Adams and Mr. Carone arrived in time for lunch, on a cool day after Mr. Trump had finished a round of golf. Steve Witkoff, a billionaire real estate developer now serving as special envoy to the Middle East, was there, as was Eric Trump. The mayor did not bring any other city officials.
The group huddled in a roped-off corner of the dining room. They discussed the recently signed cease-fire agreement between Israel and Hamas — Mr. Witkoff had played a role in the negotiations — and areas where the Trump and Adams administrations might work together.
“To be clear, we did not discuss my legal case,” Mr. Adams said in a statement afterward. He said he had discussed the city’s priorities, adding, “I strongly believe there is much our city and the federal government can partner on to make New York City safer, stronger and more affordable.”
Three days later, Mr. Adams said he had received a last-minute invitation to the presidential inauguration from Mr. Witkoff, which he accepted “on behalf of New York City.”
Mr. Adams’s lawyers seized the momentum.
Soon after the inauguration, they sent a letter to the top White House lawyer to request that Mr. Trump pardon the mayor. And while the White House did not respond, the acting deputy attorney general, Emil Bove III, one of Mr. Trump’s former criminal defense lawyers, soon reached out to discuss potentially dropping the case.
‘He Was Always Supportive’
Mr. Adams was not the only one who wanted something.
The Trump administration sought the mayor’s support for an immigration crackdown.
And the Trump Organization wants the city’s blessing to regain control of the Wollman ice rink in Central Park, a chance to restore his name to a hometown landmark.
Wollman is a city-owned property that Mr. Trump helped refurbish in 1986 and wove into his public image as a master builder. The Trump Organization operated the rink for years, but the de Blasio administration moved to expel the company after the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot. The Trump contract expired, and a new operator took over later that year.
The current contract expires in 2027, so the city parks agency last year solicited bids on a new 20-year deal to operate the rink. The Trump Organization and the existing operator of the rink — a consortium that includes the real estate giant Related Companies — submitted bids that the city is now evaluating, people with knowledge of the matter said.
In a statement, the parks agency said it was “currently reviewing all proposals consistent with its procedures and the terms of the solicitation.”
Even if the Trump Organization loses out on the rink, it owns several properties in the city and must interact with city agencies. As such, Trump Organization executives have privately discussed wanting to maintain friendly ties with Mr. Adams, whose term as mayor will continue through the end of the year even if he loses the Democratic primary in June.
In a radio interview last month, Eric Trump expressed his appreciation for Mr. Adams, comparing him positively with Mr. de Blasio.
“He never tried to throw our company out in New York,” Mr. Trump said of Mr. Adams. “He was always supportive of everything that we did.”
Eric Trump also argued that prosecutors had railroaded Mr. Adams after he criticized the Biden administration’s immigration policies. (In fact, the investigation into Mr. Adams began more than a year before his dispute with Mr. Biden.)
Five days after the radio interview, Mr. Bove ordered the Manhattan federal prosecutors to seek a dismissal of their case against Mr. Adams. The directive led to the resignations of at least eight prosecutors in New York and Washington, including the acting U.S. attorney in Manhattan, Danielle Sassoon.
Politics
House Republicans push Johnson to go to war with Senate over SAVE Act
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Several House Republicans are pushing Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., to go to war with the Senate GOP over an election security bill that has little chance of passing the upper chamber under current circumstances.
House GOP leaders convened a lawmaker-only call on Sunday in the wake of a massive military operation against Iran launched by the U.S. and Israel.
After leaders briefed House Republicans on how the chamber would respond to the ongoing conflict — including a vote on ending Democrats’ weeks-long government shutdown targeting the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) — Fox News Digital was told that several lawmakers raised concerns about the Senate not yet taking up the Safeguarding American Voter Eligiblity (SAVE America) Act. Among other provisions, the act would require voters in federal elections to produce valid ID and proof of citizenship.
Rep. Derrick Van Orden, R-Wis., was among those pushing the House to reject any bills from the Senate until the measure was taken up, telling Johnson according to multiple sources on the call, “If we don’t get this done, or at least show that we’ve got some backbone, we’re done. The midterms are over.”
Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, R-La., pauses for questions from reporters as he arrives for an early closed-door Republican Conference meeting at the Capitol in Washington, Tuesday, Feb. 3, 2026. (J. Scott Applewhite/AP Photo)
At least three other House Republicans shared similar concerns. Sources on the call said Rep. Brandon Gill, R-Texas, argued that GOP voters were “not enthused” heading into November and that “the single biggest thing” to turn that around would be forcing the Senate to pass the SAVE America Act.
The SAVE America Act passed the House last month with support from all Republicans and just one Democrat, Rep. Henry Cuellar, D-Texas.
JEFFRIES ACCUSES REPUBLICANS OF ‘VOTER SUPPRESSION’ OVER BILL REQUIRING VOTER ID, PROOF OF CITIZENSHIP
Republicans have pointed out on multiple occasions that voter ID measures have bipartisan support across multiple public polls and surveys. But Democrats have dismissed the legislation as an attempt at voter suppression ahead of the 2026 midterms.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune speaks at a press conference with other members of Senate Republican leadership following a policy luncheon in Washington, D.C. on Oct. 28, 2025. (Nathan Posner/Anadolu via Getty Images)
The legislation would require 60 votes in the Senate to break filibuster, which it’s likely not to get given Democrats’ near-uniform opposition. But House Republicans have pressured Senate Majority Leader John Thune to use a mechanism known as a standing filibuster to circumvent that — which Thune has signaled opposition to, given the vast amount of time it would take up in the Senate and potential unintended consequences in the amendment process.
It also comes as Congress grapples with the fallout from the strikes on Iran and the need to ensure safety for the U.S. domestically and for service members abroad, both of which will require close coordination between the two chambers.
Johnson told Republicans several times on the Sunday call that he was privately pressuring Thune on the bill but was wary of creating a public rift with his fellow GOP leader, sources said.
HARDLINE CONSERVATIVES DOUBLE DOWN TO SAVE THE SAVE ACT
“If we’re going to go to war against our own party in the Senate, there may be implications to that,” Johnson said at one point, according to people on the call. “So we want to be thoughtful and careful.”
Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, talks with a guest during a “Only Citizens Vote Bus Tour” rally in Upper Senate Park to urge Congress to pass the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act on Wednesday, Sept. 10, 2025. (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)
At another point in the call, sources said Rep. Andrew Clyde, R-Ga., suggested pairing a coming vote on DHS funding with the SAVE America Act in order to force the Senate to take it up.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
But both Johnson and House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Andrew Garbarino, R-N.Y., were hesitant about such a move given the enhanced threat environment in the wake of the U.S. operation in Iran.
Both spoke out in favor of the SAVE America Act, people told Fox News Digital, but warned the current situation merited leaving the DHS funding bill on its own in a bid to end the partial shutdown, so the department could fully function as a national security shield.
Politics
Trump justifies Iran attack as Congress and others raise objections
According to President Trump, the United States attacked Iran because the Islamic Republic posed “imminent threats” to the U.S. and its allies, including through its use of terrorist proxies and continued pursuit of nuclear weapons.
“Its menacing activities directly endanger the United States, our troops, our bases overseas and our allies throughout the world,” he said in a recorded statement Saturday.
According to leading Democrats in Congress, Trump’s justification is questionable, especially given his claims of having “completely obliterated” Iran’s nuclear capabilities in separate U.S. bombings last June.
“Everything I have heard from the administration before and after these strikes on Iran confirms this is a war of choice with no strategic endgame,” said Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.), ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee and part of a small group of congressional leaders — the Gang of Eight — who were briefed on the operation by Secretary of State Marco Rubio.
That divide is bound to remain an issue politically heading into this year’s midterm elections, and could be a liability for Republicans — especially considering that some in the “America First” wing of the MAGA base were raising their own objections, citing Trump’s 2024 campaign pledges to extricate the U.S. from foreign wars, not start new ones.
The debate echoed a similar if less immediate one around President George W. Bush’s decision to go to war in Iraq following the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, also based on claims that “weapons of mass destruction” posed an immediate threat. Those claims were later disproved by multiple findings that Iraq had no such arsenal, fueling recriminations from both political parties for years.
The latest divide also intensified unease over Congress ceding its wartime powers to the White House, which for years has assumed sweeping authority to attack foreign adversaries without direct congressional input in the name of addressing terrorism or preventing immediate harm to the nation or its troops.
Even prior to the weekend bombings, Democrats including Sen. Adam Schiff of California were pushing Congress to pass a resolution barring the Trump administration from attacking Iran without explicit congressional authorization.
“President Trump must come to Congress before using military force unless absolutely necessary to defend the United States from an imminent attack,” Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.), a member of the armed services and foreign relations committees, said in a statement Thursday.
In justifying the daylight strikes that killed Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei just two days later, Trump accused the Iranian government of having “waged an unending campaign of bloodshed and mass murder” for nearly half a century — including through attacks on U.S. military assets and commercial shipping vessels abroad — and of having “armed, trained and funded terrorist militias” in multiple countries, including Hezbollah and Hamas.
Trump said that after the U.S. bombed Iran last summer, it had warned Tehran “never to resume” its pursuit of nuclear weapons. “Instead, they attempted to rebuild their nuclear program and to continue developing long-range missiles that can now threaten our very good friends and allies in Europe, our troops stationed overseas, and could soon reach the American homeland,” he said.
Other Republican leaders largely backed the president.
“The United States did not start this conflict, but we will finish it. If you kill or threaten Americans anywhere in the world — as Iran has — then we will hunt you down, and we will kill you,” said Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.
“Every president has talked about the threat posed by the Iranian regime. President Trump is the one with the courage to take bold, decisive action,” said Atty. Gen. Pam Bondi.
While Iran’s coordination with and sponsorship of groups such as Hezbollah and Hamas are well known, Trump’s claims about Tehran’s ongoing development of nuclear weapons systems are less established — and the administration has provided little evidence to back them up.
Democrats seized on that lack of fresh intelligence in their responses to the attacks, contrasting Trump’s latest statements about imminent threats with his assertion after last year’s bombings that the U.S. had all but eliminated Iran’s nuclear aspirations.
“Let’s be clear: The Iranian regime is horrible. But I have seen no imminent threat to the United States that would justify putting American troops in harm’s way,” said Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.), vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee and a member of the Gang of Eight. “What is the motivation here? Is it Iran’s nuclear program? Their missiles? Regime change?”
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said in a statement that the Trump administration “has not provided Congress and the American people with critical details about the scope and immediacy of the threat,” and must do so.
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) said the Trump administration needs congressional authority to wage such attacks barring “exigent circumstances,” and didn’t have it.
“The Trump administration must explain itself to the American people and Congress immediately, provide an ironclad justification for this act of war, clearly define the national security objective and articulate a plan to avoid another costly, prolonged military quagmire in the Middle East,” he said.
After the U.S. military announced Sunday that three U.S. service personnel were killed and five others seriously wounded in the attacks, the demands for a clearer justification and new constraints on Trump only increased.
Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Fremont) said Sunday he is optimistic that Democrats will be unified in trying to pass the war powers resolution, and also that some Republicans will join them, given that the strikes have been unpopular among a portion of the MAGA base.
Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), who partnered with Khanna to force the release of the Jeffrey Epstein files, has said he will work with him again to push a congressional vote on war with Iran, which he said was “not ‘America First.’”
Benjamin Radd, a political scientist and senior fellow at the UCLA Burkle Center for International Relations, said that whether or not Iran represented an “imminent” threat to the U.S. depends not just on its nuclear capabilities, but on its broader desire and ability to inflict pain on the U.S. and its allies — as was made clear to both the U.S. and Israel after the Hamas attacks on Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, which Iran praised.
“If you are Israel or the United States, that’s imminent,” he said.
What happens next, Radd said, will largely depend on whether remaining Iranian leaders stick to Khamenei’s hard-line policies, or decide to negotiate anew with the U.S. He expects they might do the latter, because “it’s a fundamentalist regime, it’s not a suicidal regime,” and it’s now clear that the U.S. and Israel have the capabilities to take out Iranian leaders, Iran has little ability to defend itself, and China and Russia are not rushing to its aid.
How the strikes are viewed moving forward may also depend on what those leaders decide to do next, said Kevan Harris, an associate professor of sociology who teaches courses on Iran and Middle East politics at the UCLA International Institute.
If the conflict remains relatively contained, it could become a political win for Trump, with questions about the justification falling away. But if it spirals out of control, such questions are likely to only grow, as occurred in Iraq when things started to deteriorate there, he said.
Israel and the U.S. are betting that the conflict will remain manageable, which could turn out to be true, Harris said, but “the problem with war is you never really know what might happen.”
On Sunday, Iran launched retaliatory attacks on Israel and the wider Gulf region. Trump said the campaign against Iran continued “unabated,” though he may be willing to negotiate with the nation’s new leaders. It was unclear when Congress might take up the war powers measure.
Politics
Video: Trump’s War of Choice With Iran
new video loaded: Trump’s War of Choice With Iran
By David E. Sanger, Gilad Thaler, Thomas Vollkommer and Laura Salaberry
March 1, 2026
-
World4 days agoExclusive: DeepSeek withholds latest AI model from US chipmakers including Nvidia, sources say
-
Massachusetts4 days agoMother and daughter injured in Taunton house explosion
-
Montana1 week ago2026 MHSA Montana Wrestling State Championship Brackets And Results – FloWrestling
-
Denver, CO4 days ago10 acres charred, 5 injured in Thornton grass fire, evacuation orders lifted
-
Louisiana7 days agoWildfire near Gum Swamp Road in Livingston Parish now under control; more than 200 acres burned
-
Technology1 week agoYouTube TV billing scam emails are hitting inboxes
-
Technology1 week agoStellantis is in a crisis of its own making
-
Politics1 week agoOpenAI didn’t contact police despite employees flagging mass shooter’s concerning chatbot interactions: REPORT