Connect with us

Politics

Column: Everyone’s talking about Reps. Boebert and Greene because they stuck out like sore thumbs

Published

on

Column: Everyone’s talking about Reps. Boebert and Greene because they stuck out like sore thumbs

Many individuals are outraged that Reps. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.) and Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) heckled President Joe Biden throughout his first official State of the Union handle.

Me, I’m delighted. Not solely was it an exquisitely shameless seize for consideration, even by their usually shameless attention-grabbing requirements, nevertheless it fell fully flat.

If Boebert and Greene had proven up on the Oscars carrying scuba gear, they couldn’t have extra clearly misinterpret the room.

I’m not curious about pearl-clutching over the sacred nature of the Home chamber in the course of the State of the Union; a president’s annual accounting of the yr will not be sacred and has, over time, seen its share of heckling, audible groans and stony silences from each side of the aisle. After President Trump delivered his final SOTU, Speaker of the Home Nancy Pelosi publicly, with nice fanfare, tore her onerous copy of the speech into items (although at no level did she try to interrupt the president).

Advertisement

I’m not even referring to the absurdly inept timing of Boebert’s outburst. The truth that the president selected to not point out this nation’s very messy withdrawal from Afghanistan is open to reliable criticism, however Boebert wasn’t curious about reliable criticism. As a substitute she yelled an accusation that Biden is personally answerable for the deaths of 13 troops throughout that withdrawal. And she or he did so whilst Biden was calling for higher healthcare for veterans affected by most cancers doubtlessly brought on by burn pits. Together with his son Beau, who died of mind most cancers in 2015.

It was fairly stunning, nevertheless it was additionally type of hilarious, in an “is Lauren Boebert truly a wind-up toy programmed with incendiary ‘own-the-libs’ non sequiturs?” type of manner.

It’s attainable she simply had a Pavlovian response to the phrase “Afghanistan.” It’s additionally attainable she learn the speech upfront and nonetheless selected that second to step on the president’s reference to struggling veterans together with his lifeless son. She might not care what the press thinks, however Biden was discussing a horrible state of affairs for a lot of veterans, and interrupting that will not go down effectively together with her base.

Many Republicans, together with Home Minority Chief Kevin McCarthy, had been known as out for showing to pay extra consideration to their telephones than the president. Which appears impolite, however who is aware of? Perhaps they had been fact-checking Biden as he spoke, or speaking with constituents, or having baby care points.

Boebert and Greene, then again, made it clear they’d their very own agenda, one which appeared to have little to do with present occasions — and by present, I imply of this decade. Boebert wore a “Drill Child Drill” scarf (2008, come get your scarf), which didn’t even come shut, in style or affect, to the “I actually don’t care, do u?” jacket First Girl Melania Trump wore … in 2018. In the meantime, Greene, who lately spoke at a conference organized by a white nationalist, truly tried to get an equally dated “Construct the Wall” chant going.

Advertisement

Don’t they know Russia simply invaded Ukraine and everyone seems to be freaked out by inflation? Nobody is speaking in regards to the wall!!

In different phrases, they got here spoiling for a combat — and stood out like sore thumbs in a room the place stoking partisan divisions was not on the agenda. If something, Biden’s constant, insistent alternative of unity over division left the 2 ladies wanting outplayed.

Opening with a name for continued assist of Ukraine, he took some credit score for working to maintain NATO united in its condemnation of Russian President Vladimir Putin’s resolution to invade a sovereign nation. However as an alternative of stating that Trump and lots of of his supporters have typically expressed assist for Putin, Biden assumed everybody in Congress and the nation was on the identical web page. America would stand as one to assist finish the unfold of tyranny.

Biden didn’t point out Afghanistan, however neither did he point out the Jan. 6 rebellion, wherein a Trump-supporting mob, buoyed by lies fed to them by folks like Boebert and Greene, threatened the American authorities within the very chamber the place they had been all sitting.

In the course of the portion of his speech dedicated to COVID-19, he careworn the success of the nation’s 70% vaccination price, passing no judgment on the campaigns of disinformation from many conservative politicians which have stored far too many Individuals from getting vaccinated.

Advertisement

He celebrated the 80 bipartisan payments he signed final yr and thanked Republicans for serving to to go them. His solely point out of his predecessor was in regard to “the $2 trillion tax lower handed within the earlier administration that benefited the highest 1% of Individuals.”

There have been some boos over that — and honest sufficient. Congress is and has all the time been divided on taxes. Like most State of the Union speeches, this one was interrupted many, many instances by applause and standing ovations that got here principally from one facet of the aisle whereas the opposite sat in grim silence. Once more, honest sufficient, although Biden acquired extra bipartisan ovations than his predecessor.

Certainly, the president’s speech was clearly an try to meet not less than one in all his marketing campaign guarantees — to finish all of the partisan bickering, name-calling and ugly assaults which have been the hallmark of American politics in recent times. Political disagreement between the events, and between Individuals, is a essential a part of the democratic course of. Private vitriol, conflict-baiting and obsessive attachment to the notion of pink versus blue will not be.

He was aided on this by a basic outrage over Russia’s assault on Ukraine, however Boebert and Greene clearly didn’t get even that memo. They may not even faux for one hour to need a nation able to negotiating political variations with out going straight to a road brawl. Some would possibly say that is how they received their seats and please their base, or that one particular person’s heckling is one other’s talking reality to energy.

However they regarded ridiculous, partly as a result of they had been being ridiculous, but in addition as a result of they had been being ridiculous alone.

Advertisement

Many individuals within the Home chamber should not completely satisfied about a lot of what Biden has finished throughout his first yr as president, and lots of disagree with the plans he laid out. But even with all of the telephone staring, virtually all had been content material with withholding their applause, remaining seated and infrequently shaking their heads. And when Biden stated one thing they agreed with, they too stood and clapped.

The truth that everyone seems to be speaking about Boebert and Greene is proof that they had been alone of their ill-timed, ill-conceived outbursts. And that’s truly an excellent factor. Apart from them. For them, it’s simply embarrassing.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Politics

North Carolina Sens. Tills, Budd call for military leader to oversee Hurricane Helene response

Published

on

North Carolina Sens. Tills, Budd call for military leader to oversee Hurricane Helene response

Two Republican senators are calling for the Biden administration to appoint a military leader to lead the recovery effort in the aftermath of Hurricane Helene, as some lawmakers continue to criticize the federal government’s response to the storm. 

In a joint statement, Republican Sens. Thom Tillis and Ted Budd, both of North Carolina, issued a joint statement Friday evening concerning the response operations.  

BIDEN GETS DEFENSIVE WHEN PUSHED ON WHO’S ‘COMMANDING’ HURRICANE HELENE RESPONSE

Homes are seen in the aftermath of Hurricane Helene in Chimney Rock Village, N.C. (AP Photo/Mike Stewart)

“Our National Guard and local, state, and federal first responders on the ground have been working tirelessly to respond to this disaster with the resources they have,” the statement reads. “Given the unprecedented extent of the devastation and complexity of search and rescue operations, it would be helpful to assign an active-duty military leader who has extensive experience with operations of this magnitude to lead moving forward.”

Advertisement

The Biden administration has come under for a purportedly inadequate response to the devastation left by Helene. As of Friday, the death toll in southeastern states hit hardest by the storm has risen past 224, with more than 100 dead in western North Carolina alone. 

BUTTIGIEG’S MESSAGE ON RESTRICTING CIVILIAN DRONES NEAR HURRICANE HELENE DAMAGE PROMPTS OUTCRY, CLARIFICATION

President Biden touring devastation from Hurricane Helene

President Biden and Gov. Roy Cooper, D-N.C., greet first responders after touring areas impacted by Hurricane Helene, at the ariport in Greenville, S.C., Wednesday. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)

The White House has said that Biden has coordinated the federal response, including approving emergency declarations and deploying 1,000 active-duty soldiers to support search-and-rescue efforts. More than 4,800 personnel from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and other agencies have been deployed to North Carolina and neighboring states impacted by Helene. 

FEMA Director Deanne Criswell was on the ground in North Carolina on Friday, saying the military was delivering food and water to residents from distribution centers. 

Hurricane Helene devastation

Debris is strewn on the lake in the aftermath of Hurricane Helene on Wednesday in Lake Lure, N.C.  (AP Photo/Mike Stewart)

Additionally, FEMA has shipped over 8.5 million meals, more than 7 million liters of water, 150 generators and over 220,000 tarps to aid response efforts, according to the White House.

Advertisement

As of Friday, the federal government has provided more than $45 million in Individual Assistance to survivors impacted by the storm, White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said, including in the form of one-time $750 payments from FEMA to qualified applicants in Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Virginia. 

Biden meets with FEMA director in North Carolina

President Biden talks with Deanne Criswell, administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), as he arrives at Greenville-Spartanburg International Airport in Greer, S.C. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)

Fox News Digital has reached out to FEMA and the White House. 

Fox News Digital’s Chris Pandolfo contributed to this report. 

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Shaikin: In yet another Dodgers-Padres NLDS matchup, Steve Garvey can't lose

Published

on

Shaikin: In yet another Dodgers-Padres NLDS matchup, Steve Garvey can't lose

You can buy an autographed baseball in a million places, but you can buy a $75 autographed baseball from a U.S. Senate candidate in one place.

The candidate, of course, is Steve Garvey, who is a household name in California not because of a life spent in politics, but because of a distinguished career for the Dodgers and San Diego Padres.

In his race against Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Burbank), Garvey is a decided underdog. No Republican has won a California Senate seat since 1988.

On Saturday — one month before Election Day — the two teams that Garvey played for open their National League Division Series at Dodger Stadium. That made Friday a good day to check in with Garvey.

Dodgers. Padres. Who’s going to win?

Advertisement

My team is going to win. (He laughed.)

You spent most of your life with the Dodgers. You were a batboy for the Dodgers long before you were their first baseman — an eight-time All-Star, a most valuable player, a World Series champion. How did you end up a major player in Padres history?

Back when the Dodgers made me an offer I could refuse (Garvey was a free agent after the 1982 season), I ended up with (Padres owner and McDonald’s baron) Ray Kroc at his clifftop house. He said: ‘Stevie, I really want you here. I know what you can do on the field, but this community needs somebody that understands the relationship between the people and the town. We haven’t had that.’

He said there was only one problem: ‘I can only pay you in Big Macs and french fries.’

In 1983, your first year in San Diego, the Padres finished at .500. The team had one winning record in its 15 seasons. In 1984, the Padres went to the World Series.

Advertisement

By the second year, we had acquired (closer Goose) Gossage and (third baseman Graig) Nettles. Tony Gwynn was in his third year. We had (shortstop Garry) Templeton and (catcher Terry) Kennedy and (outfielder Kevin) McReynolds, and (second baseman Alan) Wiggins emerged, and a pretty doggone good pitching staff.

‘84 was the year. It was kind of the emergence of Padre history. To have been part of the Dodger organization, from batboy in ‘56 to all those years I was part of that great historical franchise, to be part of it and make a significant contribution, and then to go to San Diego and help them to win for the first time and build their history, I take a lot of pride in that.

Who ever thought I wouldn’t be a Dodger my whole career? And life happens. To have had it work that way was pretty neat.

Your most memorable moment with the Padres must be the walkoff home run in Game 4 of the 1984 NL championship series, which put the team one victory away from the World Series.

Wherever I go, people tell me where they were, which is always a sign of a historical moment.

Advertisement

And your most memorable moment with the Dodgers?

The world championship of ‘81 was really the highlight of my career. If you play a team sport, winning the world championship is the ultimate. We had been frustrated in ‘74, ‘77 and ‘78. And then in ‘81, with the way it transpired with the strike, it seemed to be a team of destiny.

Do you find it curious that your number has been retired by the Padres but not by the Dodgers?

With Don Newcombe and (Fernando Valenzuela) and myself, we were the first class of Legends of Dodger Baseball, which has emerged over the last few years. That is quite an honor, too.

Everybody always asks me: ‘Why isn’t your number retired?’ It’s totally up to the organization. I’m honored to have San Diego and the Padres retire my number. I’ve said it’s probably going to happen in the future. I don’t get up every day and think about it.

Advertisement

Do you get heckled when you campaign in the San Francisco Bay Area?

I don’t. We just came from Northern California. It’s really good natured. Some people will say, ‘Oh, he used to beat us.’ But a lot of people will say, ‘Garvey, we hated the Dodgers, but we’ll vote for you. It’s so bad up here, and we pretty much know you.’

Our theme has been — and my wife, Candace, came up with it — I never took the field for Democrats or Republicans, but for all the fans.

In the best interest of California, do you have a plan to make the Giants great again?

The Giants great again?

Advertisement

That would give the state three great National League teams.

They had that streak (three championships in five years), which was a statement for this millennium in Giant history. Whenever your rivals are good, it’s good for the game and good for both teams.

That’s why the emergence of the Padres is good: everybody has been waiting for a time when they truly are relatively equal with the Dodgers.

On the other side of the San Francisco Bay, a major league team has left Oakland and is planning to leave the state entirely, to move to Las Vegas. Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Oakland) has introduced a bill that would require teams that leave a community to compensate that community, given its support of the team and often its contributions toward a stadium. Would you support that bill?

It’s free will and choice. It’s business. It’s capitalism. If you have a smaller market, you know the challenges and restraints. Ultimately, it is up to ownership to decide their future destiny.

Advertisement

It’s obviously very emotional for her, and for the people of Oakland, and the great players that have come out of there — Dave Stewart and Dusty Baker and all of those guys. But it’s purely a business decision made by ownership. People don’t necessarily like it because they are local, and they have had a great history there. It’s just the nature of business in America.

So you do not see a role for the federal government in franchise relocation?

No. God, lower taxes, smaller government, and the pursuit of happiness. That’s what Ronald Reagan told me.

In sports, your team works together to beat the other team. That is what is happening in Congress now. In Washington, that makes for dysfunction. How might your sports background help you resolve that?

Our theme has been common sense, compassion and consensus. I’ve said, when I am elected U.S. senator from California, I will begin, on the first day, to go to all other 99 senators — go to their office, stick out my hand and say, ‘I’m Steve Garvey, and I want to work with you for the best interests of my state, your state and the country.’ I don’t think too many people are willing to do that, or have.

Advertisement

One last try: Dodgers. Padres. Who are you rooting for in this series?

My team is going to win. (He laughed again.)

Dodging a question? You just might have a future in politics.

I hope so. Six years, at least. One term.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Blackface photo shakes up toss-up House district in NY

Published

on

Blackface photo shakes up toss-up House district in NY

Join Fox News for access to this content

Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

A close House race in New York was rocked by an October surprise when photos surfaced of the incumbent Republican congressman in blackface as part of a Halloween costume years ago.

Rep. Michael Lawler, R-N.Y., who is white, is pictured dressed like pop sensation Michael Jackson, complete with bronzer to darken his face in an October 2006 photo reported by the New York Times. Lawler does not dispute the photo’s authenticity and has issued an apology to anyone who has taken offense, though he said it was not his intention to dress in blackface.

Advertisement

“As has been well-documented – most recently by the Daily Beast – I was a so-called ‘Super Fan’ of Michael Jackson, so much so that I was mentioned by name in his biography for my outspoken support of him and the Jackson Family.  I loved Michael’s music, was awed by him as a performer, and by his impact on pop culture,” Lawler said in a statement. “One of my greatest memories is attending his concert at Madison Square Garden before his untimely death.  

“When attempting to imitate Michael’s legendary dance moves at a college Halloween party eighteen years ago, the ugly practice of black face was the furthest thing from my mind. Let me be clear, this is not that. Rather, my costume was intended as the sincerest form of flattery, a genuine homage to one of my childhood idols since I was a little kid trying to moonwalk through my mom’s kitchen.  

FOX NEWS POWER RANKINGS: HARRIS TICKS UP AND SENATE REPUBLICANS TAKE CHARGE

Rep. Mike Lawler, R-N.Y., talks with reporters after a meeting of the House Republican Conference in the U.S. Capitol on Tuesday, June 4, 2024.  (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

“I am a student of history and for anyone who takes offense to the photo, I am sorry.  All you can do is live and learn, and I appreciate everyone’s grace along the way,” he said. 

Advertisement

The 38-year-old Lawler, a moderate first-term lawmaker from the Hudson Valley, is seen as a rising star in the GOP conference who is running for re-election in a suburban swing district. His Democratic opponent in New York’s 17th Congressional District is former Rep. Mondaire Jones, a Black man. The Jones campaign did not respond to a request for comment.

Michael Lawler dressed in blackface as Michael Jackson

Photos show Rep. Michael Lawler pictured in October 2005, dressed as pop star Michael Jackson complete with bronzer to darken his face. Lawler did not dispute the authenticity of the photos.  (Published by the New York Times)

The race is one of 22 toss-up contests that may well determine which party controls the House of Representatives next year, according to Fox News’ Power Rankings.  

Lawler is not the first politician to be wrapped up in recent controversy over a costume that resembled blackface. Former Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam, a Democrat, faced calls to resign after a photo from his medical school yearbook surfaced which pictured men in Ku Klux Klan robes and blackface. Northam denied he was in the photo but admitted he once used shoe polish to darken his face for a dance contest in the 1980s in which he too dressed like Jackson.

NEW YORK REPUBLICAN WRANGLES WITH CNN HOST HITTING TRUMP’S ECONOMIC POLICIES

Mondaire Jones

Lawler is up against former Rep. Mondaire Jones. (Getty Images)

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau also faced controversy in 2019 when photos surfaced of him wearing blackface in 2001. The prime minister said in an interview after the fact that he could not give a definitive number on how many times he had worn blackface. 

Advertisement

Lawler was photographed in his Jackson costume in New York City when he was a sophomore at Manhattan College, now Manhattan University, a Catholic school in the Bronx where only three percent of the student population is Black, according to the New York Times. 

Lawler, who was class valedictorian in 2009, was well-known for his love of Michael Jackson, the paper reported.

When Lawler was a high school senior in 2005, he flew from New York to California to attend parts Jackson’s criminal trial. The musician had faced allegations of molesting a 13-year-old boy at his Neverland Ranch, though Jackson was eventually acquitted. 

FORMER DEMOCRATIC REP MONDAIRE JONES LAUNCHES COMEBACK BID FOR CRUCIAL SEAT THAT HELPED GOP TAKE HOUSE

Michael Jackson performance

Michael Jackson performing “Thriller” on stage at Madison Square Garden as part of his Bad Tour in 1988.  (George De Sota (ID 5073478)/Redferns)

Jackson biographer J. Randy Taraborrelli recounted in his book how he helped get Lawler into the courtroom, according to the Daily Beast. Taraborrelli wrote in “Michael Jackson: The Magic, The Madness, The Whole Story” that the teen had been “so disgusted” by testimony against Jackson “that he couldn’t help but mutter something derogatory under his breath.” 

Advertisement

In Taraborrelli’s account, Lawler was overheard by court officials and “tossed right out of the courtroom.” 

The photos in question were posted to Facebook and depict Lawler dressed in a jacket reminiscent of the one Jackson wore in the “Thriller” music video. 

The New York Times cited a person familiar with the costume who said that Lawler had used bronzer borrowed from female classmates to darken his skin. 

Lawler’s 2022 victory was one of several Republican victories in crucial New York districts, despite the state’s status as reliably blue overall. The 17th includes stretches through four suburban counties outside of New York City: Dutchess, Putnam, Rockland and Westchester.

Advertisement

Fox News Digital’s Emma Colton and Emily Robertson contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

Trending