Politics
Biden blocks Russian oil imports in latest round of sanctions on Kremlin

President Biden introduced on Tuesday that the U.S. will ban the importing of Russian oil, liquefied pure gasoline and coal, broadening the financial sanctions leveled towards Moscow over its warfare in Ukraine.
The focusing on of Russia’s most profitable trade regardless of the probability of upper gasoline costs comes as bipartisan assist in Congress has coalesced behind such restrictions and Europe has begun taking steps to scale back its imports of Russian power merchandise. The oil ban and different robust sanctions are being imposed by Western powers within the hopes of persuading Russian President Vladimir Putin to halt his all-out assault on the previous Soviet republic.
“Russian oil will now not be accepted at U.S. ports,” Biden mentioned in a speech from the White Home. “We is not going to be a part of subsidizing Putin’s warfare.”
“Russia might proceed to grind out its advance at a horrible worth, however this a lot is already clear: Ukraine won’t ever be a victory for Putin. Putin might be able to take a metropolis. However he’ll by no means be capable of maintain the nation,” Biden mentioned, including that the ban would goal “the primary artery of Russia’s economic system.”
Biden’s motion was welcomed by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, who tweeted he was “grateful” the president had delivered a blow at “the guts of Putin’s warfare machine and banning oil, gasoline and coal from US market. Encourage different nations and leaders to comply with.”
The White Home had initially shrugged off calls to ban Russian oil, arguing that the impression on world markets could be destabilizing to the West. Administration officers had additionally mentioned that deep financial sanctions had been already hitting Moscow’s largest banks and several other oligarchs near Putin, weakening the ruble and the nation’s economic system broadly.
However Biden clearly warmed to the thought as assist grew from Democrats and Republicans on Capitol Hill for a bipartisan invoice to ban Russian power, at the same time as some Democrats anxious that they might pay a political worth in November’s midterm elections for public frustrations about excessive gasoline costs.
It’s the first time the U.S. has gotten forward of its European allies in sanctioning Russia. Europe depends way more closely on Russian power imports and has been extra reluctant to affix in a ban. The U.S. imports round 700,000 barrels of oil a day from Russia, accounting for lower than 10% of the nation’s power provide. Europe imports greater than 4 million barrels a day of Russian gas.
However it appeared Europe’s reluctance was waning amid experiences that the European Union and the U.Okay. will start to dial down imports of Russian power.
Britain will part out imports of Russian oil and oil merchandise — although not pure gasoline — by the tip of the 12 months, Prime Minister Boris Johnson mentioned. The announcement got here as Zelensky delivered an impassioned speech through video hyperlink to the British Parliament, the place he acquired a boisterous standing ovation.
“Working with trade, we’re assured that this may be achieved over the course of the 12 months, offering sufficient time for firms to regulate and making certain shoppers are protected,” Johnson mentioned in a press release.
Although much less forward-leaning, the European Fee introduced plans to slash EU dependence on Russian pure gasoline by as a lot as two-thirds this 12 months and “finish reliance” on Russian fossil fuels earlier than 2030. Russia provides roughly 40% of the 27-nation bloc’s gasoline. The EU is in search of different sources and cleaner power.
German Chancellor Olaf Scholz mentioned a full ban is “untimely,” though he has already taken the extraordinary step of halting certification of the Nord Stream 2 gasoline pipeline between Russia and Germany’s Baltic Coast, a enterprise Putin had lengthy sought to extend his leverage over Europe’s power assets.
“The U.S. ban is basically symbolic as a result of Russian crude is a replaceable crude for us,” mentioned Diane Munro, a longtime oil market analyst who famous that imports from Iraq, Canada and the nation’s strategic reserve can offset the lack of Russian oil. “Europe can’t actually take the identical step with out trashing the worldwide market.”
Regardless of Russian oil’s comparatively small position within the home market, banning it might result in increased costs on the pump within the U.S. Gasoline is already averaging $4 a gallon nationwide, up from $2.77 a 12 months in the past, in response to AAA. The typical worth of gasoline in California throughout that very same interval has risen from $3.75 to $5.34.
Biden acknowledged the brand new ban will likely be felt in People’ wallets however warned U.S. oil firms towards making the most of the disaster.
“It’s no excuse to train extreme worth will increase or padding earnings or any sort of effort to use the scenario,” he mentioned in a message geared toward power executives. “It’s not time for profiteering or worth gouging.”
Till now, the financial strangulation of Russia by the West over its unprovoked invasion of Ukraine has averted its strong power sector. However as Russia will increase its unrelenting bombardment of Ukrainian cities, political strain on the West has grown to do extra to place strain on Putin to cease the onslaught. U.S. officers mentioned the Biden administration can be contemplating easing restrictions on imports of oil from Venezuela to alleviate the void left by Russian oil bans, a politically problematic step.
For the reason that Obama administration, Washington has been sanctioning Venezuela and blacklisting senior Venezuelan officers due to human rights abuses and the trampling of democracy there. President Trump broke diplomatic ties with Caracas. However Venezuela sits on one of many world’s largest reserves of oil, exploitation of which the sanctions have helped to curb.
Biden’s announcement Tuesday didn’t point out Venezuela or different different sources of crude. He did say, nonetheless, that he hopes the Ukraine warfare results in an accelerated transition to wash power.
It’s in that space the place bipartisan assist will flag. Many Republicans advocate reopening environmentally delicate U.S. parks and ocean beds to drilling. In the meantime, Democrats have been pushing to scale back U.S. reliance on fossil fuels.
For now, although, Democrats and Republicans are talking in comparable phrases. The administration was going through strain to enact an oil ban earlier than Congress took motion. Members of each political events have launched payments in each homes to dam such imports.
Regardless of Biden’s announcement, the Home remains to be anticipated to vote on laws to impose the Russian oil ban, Home Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-San Francisco) informed Democrats in a closed-door assembly Tuesday, in response to a Democratic aide. The laws can be anticipated to incorporate different measures.
Pelosi informed Democrats that she had been alerted by the White Home days in the past that Biden would announce the oil ban.
Congress is weighing an oil ban because it pushes to cross a measure to ship Ukraine billions of {dollars} in emergency help. Senate Majority Chief Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) on Monday referred to as for passage of a $12-billion help package deal this week, saying it “will present each humanitarian and navy help for Ukraine: funding for refugees, medical provides, emergency meals provides, in addition to funding to assist weapons transfers into Ukraine, and assist for our japanese flank NATO allies.”
In a letter to Home Democrats on Sunday, Pelosi mentioned Congress supposed to cross $10 billion in emergency help for Ukraine as half of a bigger authorities funding measure. The Home can be exploring laws that may “additional isolate” Russia from the world economic system, Pelosi mentioned.
Occasions workers author Jennifer Haberkorn in Washington contributed to this report.

Politics
Marjorie Taylor Greene Bought Market Dip Before Trump Paused Tariffs, Profiting From the Rally

Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, Republican of Georgia, disclosed on Monday that she had purchased between tens and hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of stock on April 8 and 9, the day before and the day of President Trump’s announcement that he was pausing a sweeping set of global tariffs, a pivot that sent the stock market soaring out of a sizable slump.
Ms. Greene bought between about $21,000 and $315,000 in stocks on those days. The day before Mr. Trump’s move, she also dumped between $50,000 and $100,000 in Treasury bills, according to required public disclosures made to the House.
The report came as Democrats in Congress have demanded investigations of whether the president’s whipsawing moves on trade might have been aimed at manipulating the market and giving his allies a lucrative opportunity for insider trading.
Members of Congress are required to report their stock trades within 30 days of making them, though they only have to mark down broad ranges rather than specific dollar amounts. Ms. Greene’s April 8 and 9 trades — 21 each in the range of $1,001 to $15,000 — are some of the first among members of Congress that will be reported over the coming month as lawmakers detail their financial moves around the time the president encouraged people to buy the dip ahead of his pause on tariffs.
“THIS IS A GREAT TIME TO BUY!!!” Mr. Trump wrote on social media the morning of April 9. About four hours later, he said he was pausing most tariffs on every country except China, an announcement that resulted in massive one-day gains in stocks.
Ms. Greene, one of Mr. Trump’s most loyal allies in the House and an active stock trader, appeared to heed the advice, making an unusually large volume of stock purchases. That day, she bought stock in several companies, including Apple, which has since gone up in value by about 5 percent. She also bought stock in other technology companies, as well as energy firms such as Devon Energy Corporation and the pharmaceutical giant Merck & Company, according to her public disclosures.
The day before, she purchased stock in Palantir, whose value has since gone up 19 percent, and in Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., whose stock has since risen 21 percent. She also sold the Treasury bills as government bond yields were rising amid the tariff chaos, (Ms. Greene had previously purchased up to $500,000 in Treasuries before April 2, when Mr. Trump announced his most expansive tariffs to date.)
Ms. Greene, who is the chairwoman of the DOGE subcommittee of the House Oversight Committee, did not respond to a request for comment. When her stock trades were examined in the past, she told The Atlanta-Journal Constitution that she relies on a financial adviser to trade on her behalf and does not have input on which companies are being traded, or when.
Lawmakers in both parties have long championed legislation to ban individual stock trading by members of Congress as a way to appeal to growing populist sentiment among constituents.
The tumult in the stock market caused by Mr. Trump’s erratic moves on tariffs has led Democrats to question who is gaining financially because of it. Ms. Greene is not alone in appearing to have capitalized on the market volatility.
Representative Rob Bresnahan, a Pennsylvania Republican who has emerged as one of the most active stock traders in the freshman class despite saying during his campaign that he wanted to ban congressional stock trading, also appears to have profited from Mr. Trump’s tariffs.
Mr. Bresnahan sold up to $50,000 in Alibaba stock on March 4, the same day Mr. Trump doubled the tariff on Chinese imports to 20 percent. Alibaba is an e-commerce giant with close ties to the Chinese Communist Party. The stock price rose by about 30 percent between Mr. Bresnahan’s initial purchase and his final sale.
A spokeswoman for Mr. Bresnahan said that he relies on a financial adviser to trade stocks for him, and never knows about the trades before they happen or when they occur. The Alibaba trade, she said, was part of a larger strategic stock package. When it was reported in his disclosure, Mr. Bresnahan’s team put in guardrails so that he would not be able to trade that stock again.
While there has been no evidence of insider trading, Democrats have zeroed in on the potential for malfeasance as a way to attack Mr. Trump’s tariff moves and suggest that he and his friends are exploiting decisions that have hurt ordinary people.
“It is unconscionable that as American families are concerned about their financial security during this economic crisis entirely manufactured by the president, insiders may have actively profited from the market volatility and potentially perpetrated financial fraud on the American public,” a group of Democrats led by Senators Adam Schiff of California and Ruben Gallego of Arizona wrote in a letter last week to Paul Atkins, the chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
In the letter, they demanded that Mr. Atkins open an investigation to determine whether Mr. Trump or any “insiders” had engaged in insider trading or other securities law violations.
Separately, Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Democrat of New York, wrote in a fund-raising appeal on April 11 that “any member of Congress who purchased stocks in the last 48 hours should probably disclose that now,” after Nasdaq call volume spiked ahead of Mr. Trump’s announcement. Ms. Ocasio-Cortez has been a longtime proponent of legislation to ban stock trading for members of Congress.
Politics
EXCLUSIVE: Nancy Mace targeted by Pennsylvania man arrested for threatening Trump

EXCLUSIVE: A man charged with making threats to murder President Donald Trump was also found to have threatened Rep. Nance Mace, R-S.C., a source with knowledge of the matter told Fox News Digital.
Mace’s office was informed by U.S. Capitol Police that Shawn Monper of Butler, Pennsylvania, made threats against her on social media in January, the source said.
The man allegedly wrote of Mace on YouTube, “If I ever see her unprotected in public I would live to be the one to put a bullet in her skull. What a disgusting peice [sic] of trash.”
FLORIDA CHARGES TRUMP ASSASSINATION ATTEMPT SUSPECT WITH ATTEMPTED MURDER, TERRORISM
Rep. Nancy Mace, R-S.C., questions U.S. Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle (AP Photo/John McDonnell)
Mace appears to be the only member of Congress targeted by the suspect for now, the source told Fox News Digital.
It’s not immediately clear why Mace, an outspoken Trump ally, was threatened.
But it comes amid concerns about escalating threats against elected officials on both sides of the aisle.
Trump, who was subject to two failed assassination attempts during the 2024 election, was targeted by Monper in a series of threats on YouTube, according to a release by the Department of Justice (DOJ).
STATE-CONTROLLED IRANIAN NEWSPAPER CALLS FOR FIRING BULLETS INTO TRUMP’S ‘EMPTY’ SKULL

President Donald Trump arrives at an election night watch party at the Palm Beach Convention Center, Wednesday, Nov. 6, 2024, in West Palm Beach, Fla. (Evan Vucci/AP)
The FBI “received an emergency disclosure regarding threats posted to YouTube by user ‘Mr Satan’” between Jan. 15 and April 5, according to the release.
Monper also got a firearms permit “shortly following” Trump’s inauguration, and posted in Februrary under the aforementioned username, “I have bought several guns and been stocking up on ammo since Trump got in office,” the DOJ said.
Posts in March showed Monper threatening a mass shooting.
Further posts uncovered by federal authorities show him targeting Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials and Elon Musk, the release showed.

Rep. Nancy Mace speaks on Day 3 of the Republican National Convention (RNC), at the Fiserv Forum in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, U.S., July 17, 2024. (REUTERS/Mike Segar)
The U.S. Secret Service was alerted to the suspect’s threats against Mace as well, the source told Fox News Digital.
U.S. Capitol Police said it would not comment on potential investigations when reached for confirmation.
Mace’s office did not immediately return a request for comment.
Politics
Salvadoran president says he won't return man deported by mistake
WASHINGTON — El Salvador President Nayib Bukele said he would not return to the United States a man who was wrongly deported by the Trump administration, despite a Supreme Court ruling that said the U.S. should take steps to facilitate his return.
Kilmar Abrego Garcia, 29, had lived in the U.S. for 14 years before the Trump administration deported him — an act White House officials called an “administrative error.” Although U.S. government officials acknowledge he was wrongly deported, they now contend that forcing his return would interfere with El Salvador’s sovereignty.
“This is up to El Salvador to return him,” U.S. Atty. Gen. Pam Bondi said Monday at the White House, where President Trump and Bukele were meeting with other officials.
Asked if he would return Abrego Garcia to the U.S., Bukele responded, “Of course I’m not going to do it.”
Without presenting any evidence, White House officials repeated claims that Abrego Garcia was a member of the MS-13 gang, and that he presented a threat if returned to the United States. Abrego Garcia has no criminal record.
He did have a withholding order, which prevented him from being deported to El Salvador, because of concerns he would be harmed by local gangs there. In its court order, the Supreme Court called his deportation “illegal.”
Protestors chant Monday outside the Salvadoran Embassy in Washington.
(Nathan Howard / Associated Press)
“The order properly requires the Government to ‘facilitate’ Abrego Garcia’s release from custody in El Salvador and to ensure that his case is handled as it would have been had he not been improperly sent to El Salvador,” the court said in its order.
However, the Supreme Court questioned a lower court’s language that the U.S. government “facilitate and effectuate” Abrego Garcia’s return, and the ambiguity of the term “effectuate.”
“The District Court should clarify its directive, with due regard for the deference owed to the Executive Branch in the conduct of foreign affairs,” the court ruling said. “For its part, the Government should be prepared to share what it can concerning the steps it has taken and the prospect of further steps.”
Trump administration officials seized on the court’s ruling. “If [El Salvador] wanted to return him, we would facilitate it — meaning, provide a plane,” Bondi said.
-
Share via
But Bukele was unequivocal. “How can I return him to the United States? I smuggle him into the United States? What do I do? Of course, I’m not going to do it,” he said.
Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) asked Bukele for a meeting during his trip to Washington. Van Hollen said he had been in touch with Abrego Garcia’s wife, mother and brother, who are concerned about his well-being in the Salvadoran prison.
“If Kilmar is not home by midweek — I plan to travel to El Salvador this week to check on his condition and discuss his release,” Van Hollen said in a statement.
Abrego Garcia, who lived in Maryland, was deported March 15 to the Terrorism Confinement Center, Salvador’s huge maximum-security prison.
The Oval Office meeting united two closely allied leaders who share a populist rhetoric and a disdain for democratic norms.
Bukele, a 43-year-old former marketing executive who has described himself as an “instrument of God” and the “world’s coolest dictator,” came to power in 2019 and quickly made global headlines by making El Salvador the first country to adopt bitcoin as legal tender.
Faced with some of the highest homicide rates in the world, his government first tried to contain the violence by secretly negotiating a truce with gangsters.
When that failed, Bukele declared a state of emergency that suspended civil liberties as authorities jailed some 85,000 people — including about 5% of the nation’s men between the ages of 18 and 35. Many of the people locked up were not criminals, human rights advocates say, and some were children as young as 12. Dozens of inmates have died in his prisons.
Pro-democracy activists and journalists cried foul, but as homicides plunged, Bukele’s approval ratings skyrocketed.
That support was crucial last year when Bukele engineered a constitutional change that allowed him to seek a prohibited second term. He won with 83% of the vote.
His popularity has made him a hero of the American right, with Bukele speaking at last year’s Conservative Political Action Conference and taking meetings with Elon Musk. Like Trump, who during Monday’s meeting repeatedly berated a CNN reporter who was present, Bukele abhors traditional media, preferring to disseminate his messages via TikTok over granting interviews with journalists.
Many of El Salvador’s investigative journalists have been forced to flee the country amid a campaign that targeted them with spyware.
Bukele’s government has also gone to war with human rights advocates, detaining at least 21 of them, according to a U.S.-based think tank, the Washington Office on Latin America. The group on Monday warned against Trump’s alliance with Bukele. “Behind the handshake and praise lie grave human rights violations and threats to democracy,” it said.
Pinho and Savage reported from Washington and Linthicum from Mexico City.
-
Politics1 week ago
Dems slam Elon Musk, Melania Trump with xenophobic attacks: ‘Go back to South Africa!’
-
News1 week ago
Firing of National Security Agency Chief Rattles Lawmakers
-
News1 week ago
Trump goes all in with bet that the heavy price of tariffs will pay off for Americans
-
News6 days ago
3 Are Killed in Shooting Near Fredericksburg, Va., Authorities Say
-
Politics1 week ago
US revokes all South Sudan visas, bars future issuance until deportees accepted
-
News1 week ago
Anti-Trump Protests Get Underway Across the Country
-
Politics1 week ago
H2Go: How experts, industry leaders say US hydrogen is fuel for the future of agriculture, energy, security
-
News1 week ago
Americans Wrestle With How Trump’s Tariffs May Change Shopping Lists