Connect with us

News

Anti-Trump Protests Get Underway Across the Country

Published

on

Anti-Trump Protests Get Underway Across the Country

They came out in defense of national parks and small businesses, public education and health care for veterans, abortion rights and fair elections. They marched against tariffs and oligarchs, dark money and fascism, the deportation of legal immigrants and the Department of Government Efficiency.

Demonstrators had no shortage of causes as they gathered in towns and cities across the country on Saturday to protest President Trump’s agenda. Rallies were planned in all 50 states, and images posted on social media showed dense crowds in places as diverse as St. Augustine, Fla.; Salt Lake City and rainy Frankfort, Ky.

“Pouring rain, 43 degrees, biting wind, and people are still here in Albany in the thousands,” said Ron Marz, a comic book writer who posted a photo of the crowd at the New York State Capitol on X.

While crowd sizes are difficult to estimate, organizers said that more than 600,000 people had signed up to participate and that events also took place in U.S. territories and a dozen locations across the globe.

On Fifth Avenue in Manhattan, the protest stretched for nearly 20 blocks. In Chicago, thousands flooded Daley Plaza and adjacent streets, while, in the nation’s capital, tens of thousands surrounded the Washington Monument. In Atlanta, the police estimated the crowd marching to the gold-domed statehouse at over 20,000.

Advertisement

Mr. Trump, who was playing golf in Florida on Saturday, appeared to be largely ignoring the protests. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Some of the demonstrators waved American flags, occasionally turned upside down to signal distress. Many, especially federal workers and college students, did not want to speak on the record for fear of retaliation. Right-wing slogans like “Stop the Steal” were co-opted in defense of Social Security, medical care and cancer research.

“I’m tariffied. Are you?” one placard read. Global financial markets tumbled this week at Mr. Trump’s announcement of tariff increases, which many economists warned would raise prices for U.S. consumers. Republicans in Congress wrestled over budget proposals that included cuts to Medicaid and SNAP food benefits.

Rob Ahlrichs, a Baltimore resident who attended the protest in Washington with his two sons and his wife, Katherine Sterner, put out a sign with a graph depicting stock market indexes plummeting that read, “Did you vote for this?”

In Chicago, Marilyn Finner, 65, who works in customer service, said she had never attended a protest but that she felt compelled to take part on Saturday because she was concerned about threats to retirement benefits.

Advertisement

“Eventually I want to receive my Social Security that I paid for,” she said. “I’ve been working since I was 13 years old. I’m fighting for my Social Security and everybody else’s.”

The mass action, with the deliberately open-ended name “Hands Off!,” was planned at a time when many Democrats have bemoaned what they see as a lack of strong resistance to Mr. Trump. The president has moved aggressively to punish people and institutions that he views as out of step with his ideology.

Don Westhoff, a 59-year-old accountant, was another first-time protester. He voiced outrage at the administration but had words for Democrats as well, saying they needed an infusion of younger leaders to oppose the president.

“We want to let the elected Democratic officials know that good is no longer good enough,” he said. “They need to fight.”

Multiple concerns prompted Katrin Hinrichsen to drive six hours from her home in Tolland, Conn., to Washington to attend. She held a sign with names of legal residents with foreign passports whom the Trump administration has moved to deport for allegations of antisemitic speech and gang activities.

Advertisement

Her 18-year-old son is transgender, she said, and she feared his losing access to gender transition care. “Now suddenly he’s a hate object, just because that’s politically convenient,” she said. “I’m just furious.”

The rallies were organized by Indivisible, MoveOn and several other groups that led protests about abortion rights, gun violence and racial justice during the first Trump administration. Organizers said they hoped to shift the emphasis to pocketbook issues like health care and Social Security, with the message that Mr. Trump is making life harder for the average American while benefiting his richest allies.

They also moved away from focusing on massive demonstrations, like the 2017 Women’s March on Washington, to instead plan hundreds of local gatherings in communities large and small.

Concerns varied by location. In Ketchum, Idaho — population 3,555 — cuts to the Forest Service generated deep concern, said Fiona Smythe, 56, a resident who attended a protest that she said drew more than 500 people. One sign showed Smokey Bear and read, “Only you can prevent forest fires. Seriously. We’ve been defunded. It’s just you now.”

Some demonstrators had specific issues, while others opposed the Trump administration and MAGA movement in general. “Hands off my money, rights, democracy,” one sign proclaimed. “Make lying wrong again,” said another. Elon Musk, the billionaire heading Mr. Trump’s slash-and-burn attack on the federal bureaucracy, was a popular target.

Advertisement

“I feel like the MAGA people have corrupted and co-opted the American flag and the idea of patriotism,” said Barbara Santarelli, 77, a retired health care worker draped in a flag who participated in the New York City rally. She described herself as a Jewish centrist who was concerned about her retirement benefits, attacks on universities and freedom of speech, the war in Gaza, and due process rights.

Before the event, she recounted, her daughter expressed concern for her safety. But she said attending the protest was something she had to do. “The soldiers, they go to war to defend democracy,” she recalled saying. “At my age, this is how I go to war to defend democracy.’”

In Chicago, Glynn Tipton, a 45-year-old pharmaceutical professional, said he was attending to make friends feel safer.

“I’m a generic white guy, so they aren’t coming for me,” he said. “There’s a lot of my friends who are Jewish, trans, in the military or sick, and they’re not doing OK. It’s OK for me to stand out here, so I should for the ones who are afraid.”

Many protesters said they had been directly affected by cuts to federal jobs and grants. In Atlanta, Johnny Johnson, 34, said he had been hired by the Internal Revenue Service, moved, fired and rehired in a matter of months.

Advertisement

“I dipped into my 401(k) because I didn’t know what was going to happen,” he said.

In Denver, veteran Trump protesters said there was a noticeably smaller Latino presence on Saturday than there had been at demonstrations during the first Trump term. “You notice there’s not a lot of Chicano people out here? It’s because people are scared,” said Brian Loma, 49, an environmental organizer who set up a tent in the snow selling hot chocolate. The government seemed to be “ripping up green cards,” he said. “It’s crazy.”

Among the demonstrators in New York City was Melissa Jackson, 41, a former special education teacher and the mother of a 3-year-old on a specialized learning plan for students with disabilities.

“I think it’s ridiculous. New York, the United States, is the melting pot. Like, what do we want? Like, not diversity, not inclusion?” she said, adding that she was also concerned about cuts to public education. “We’ve come too far to take so many steps back.”

Robert Chiarito, Sean Keenan, Kristen Nichols, Wesley Parnell and Zolan Kanno-Youngs contributed reporting.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Wall Street slashes stock market forecasts amid Trump tariff fears

Published

on

Wall Street slashes stock market forecasts amid Trump tariff fears

Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for free

Wall Street banks have slashed their targets for the main US share gauge over the past fortnight, as fears grow over the potential economic fallout from President Donald Trump’s trade war.

At least 10 banks, including JPMorgan, Bank of America and Evercore ISI, have cut their estimates for the S&P 500 index in the weeks since Trump’s decision to impose a baseline duty of 10 per cent on most US imports and higher “reciprocal tariffs” sent shockwaves through financial markets.

The S&P 500 has fallen more than 7 per cent in highly volatile trading since the initial levies were announced on April 2, and 14 per cent since touching a record high on February 19. Trump has since paused the reciprocal tariffs and created a carve-out for smartphones and some other electronics.

Advertisement

But economists say the uncertainty caused by rapid U-turns in trade policy could still slow economic growth, or even trigger a recession — something that would hit the earnings of listed US companies.

“The goldilocks sentiment in place entering this year has given way to abject uncertainty,” said Citigroup analyst Scott Chronert in a note.

Some content could not load. Check your internet connection or browser settings.

Wall Street’s average end of year S&P 500 target now stands at 6,012 — compared with 6,539 at the end of last year. The S&P 500 finished this week at 5,283.

The new forecasts mean that, despite growing worries about slowing economic growth, strategists nevertheless expect the index to rise 14 per cent over the coming months. It would mark a gain of just 2 per cent for 2025, a major slowdown from the back-to-back rallies of more than 20 per cent in 2023 and 2024.

Advertisement

The Banks’ newly cautious tone marks a humbling reversal since the start of the year, when many market participants had expected lower taxes and lighter regulation under a Republican administration to boost corporate profits.

Citigroup on Friday said it expects the S&P 500 to end the year at 5,800, down from a previous call of 6,500. The bank also lowered its 2025 earnings per share estimate to $255 from $270, just below the average forecast of $262, Bloomberg data shows.

Chronert said the recent sharp fall for US equities may become “the first bear market specifically triggered by US presidential actions”.

Line chart of S&P 500 showing US stocks have fallen sharply over the past two months

JPMorgan lowered its “base case” target on April 7 to 5,200 from 6,500, assuming “partial” relief on tariffs. “Even though we do not believe US exceptionalism is over,” the bank wrote at the time, “this [liberation day] shock came at a time when valuation was rich, positioning was crowded and leadership was particularly narrow.”

Peter Berezin at BCA Research, who has the lowest 2025 price target for the S&P 500 among analysts surveyed by Bloomberg, said in mid-February that he expects the index to close out this year at about 4,450, implying a drop of 15 per cent from current levels. In early March he said a US recession was likely to begin within the next three months.

“There’s a lot of groupthink on Wall Street,” said Berezin.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Trump administration has $15M deal with El Salvador to accept deportees, MD senator says

Published

on

Trump administration has M deal with El Salvador to accept deportees, MD senator says

Maryland Democratic Sen. Chris Van Hollen flew into Dulles Airport on Friday after visiting a wrongly deported man in El Salvador. The senator says he learned that the Trump administration struck a $15 million deal with the Central American nation to take deportees from the United States.

According to Van Hollen, Abrego Garcia been moved to a new detention facility in El Salvador. He says Abrego Garcia says he is well and that his family is keeping him motivated to keep going. 

Advertisement

But a major development came out of Van Hollen’s visit to El Salvador. 

The senator reported — for the first time — that he believes there is a $15 million deal between the United States government and El Salvador related to the detention facility where Abrego Garcia and many other deportees from the U.S. were being held. 

Van Hollen says he plans to investigate the use of taxpayer dollars in that deal as he continues to fight for Abrego Garcia’s return.

Advertisement

Dig deeper:

According to Van Hollen, Abrego Garcia asked for a phone call when he was placed in a Maryland detention facility but was denied. Then he was transferred to a facility in Texas before being put on a plane handcuffed, shackled, and he could not see out the window and did not know where he was going.  

Advertisement

Abrego Garcia says he has been traumatized by being at the detention center but he was recently moved to a new facility with better conditions.

Abrego Garcia told Van Hollen that he is not afraid of the other men in his immediate detention cell but he is fearful of other prisoners in the facility who called out to him and taunted him. 

The reason an immigration judge ruled in 2019 that he could not be deported to El Salvador was because he demonstrated a credible fear of persecution if he returned.

Advertisement

“An immigration judge found years ago that it would put his life in danger if he was returned to El Salvador,” Van Hollen said. “He was given protective status and a work permit.”
 

The other side:

Advertisement

Meanwhile, the White House continues to assert that he will not return to the United States.

Following Abrego Garcia’s deportation back in March, the Trump administration admitted that sending him back to El Salvador was an “error” but they won’t do anything to bring him back, even after a Supreme Court ruled that they should facilitate his return. 

READ MORE: Trump administration says US can’t force return of man mistakenly deported to El Salvador

Advertisement

Both Trump and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele maintain that they have no plans to bring Abrego Garcia back.

The Trump administration has repeatedly claimed Abrego Garcia is a criminal and a member of the violent MS-13 gang, but has yet to provide direct evidence of those claims. 

Advertisement

The White House also insists Abrego Garcia was in the states illegally, despite the 2019 court ruling determining he should not be deported.

NewsDullesImmigrationDonald J. Trump
Continue Reading

News

Video: The Conservative Christian Network Inside the White House

Published

on

Video: The Conservative Christian Network Inside the White House

From the moment President Trump was re-elected, his conservative Christian supporters have rejoiced in a second chance at political power. Elizabeth Dias, the national religion correspondent for The New York Times, describes what that looks like in the White House now.

Continue Reading

Trending