Connect with us

Northeast

What's next for Karen Read?

Published

on

Join Fox News for access to this content

Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

Karen Read turned and hugged her father and embraced her family after Judge Beverly Cannone declared a mistrial.

The 44-year-old financial analyst accused of killing her Boston cop boyfriend, John O’Keefe, walked out of the Dedham, Massachusetts, courthouse a free woman after two years. 

Advertisement

The jubilation on Read’s side of the courtroom was a stark contrast to O’Keefe’s mom’s tears, as family and friends rubbed her shoulders and tried to console her.

But the saga isn’t over. “The Commonwealth intends to re-try the case,” prosecutors said before a smiling Read and her lawyers were done speaking to her supporters and news outlets.

KAREN READ MURDER CASE ENDS WITH ‘DEEPLY DIVIDED’ JURY’S DECISION

Karen Read gets a long hug from her dad William before the jury breaks for lunch at Norfolk Superior Court in Dedham, Mass., Wednesday, June 26, 2024.  (Greg Derr/The Patriot Ledger via AP, Pool)

The Massachusetts jury deliberated for nearly 26 hours and had been deadlocked for days. 

Advertisement

They were “deeply divided” because of “deeply held convictions” and a “consensus is unattainable,” according to the first of two notes to the presiding judge on Monday. 

Cannone issued a controversial dynamite charge (or Allen charge), which is a last-resort option to force jurors to go continue deliberations and try to reach a unanimous verdict.

KAREN READ TRIAL COULD SINK OTHER HIGH-PROFILE MURDERS, EXPERT WARNS: ‘HARD TO SEE HOW IT DOESN’T’

Karen Read smiles during a news conference in front of Norfolk Superior Court

Karen Read smiles during a news conference in front of Norfolk Superior Court, Monday, July 1, 2024, in Dedham, Mass. A judge declared a mistrial Monday after jurors deadlocked in the case of Read, who was accused of killing her Boston police officer boyfriend by striking him with her SUV and leaving him in a snowstorm. (AP Photo/Steven Senne)

The dynamite charge’s “effectiveness in breaking deadlocks and securing verdicts is well-documented,” according to a blog post by Texas-based law firm Varghese and Summersett. 

But it’s not used in about two dozen states, as opponents argue “it can lead to verdicts that are not truly unanimous, as jurors may change their votes due to peer pressure rather than genuine conviction,” the firm said.

Advertisement

The result was the same. “Despite our commitment to the duty entrusted in us, we find ourselves deeply divided by fundamental differences in our opinions and state of mind,” the jury wrote in its final note to the judge. 

Karen Read smiles as defense attorney David Yannett speaks to reporters in front of Norfolk Superior Court

Karen Read smiles as defense attorney David Yannetti speaks to reporters in front of Norfolk Superior Court, Monday, July 1, 2024, in Dedham, Mass. A judge declared a mistrial Monday after jurors deadlocked in the case of Read, who was accused of killing her Boston police officer boyfriend by striking him with her SUV and leaving him in a snowstorm. (AP Photo/Steven Senne)

Karen Read talks with her legal team at the Norfolk Superior Court in Dedham, Mass

Karen Read talks with her legal team at the Norfolk Superior Court in Dedham, Mass., Monday, July 1, 2024. This is their fifth day of deliberations in the murder trial for Read. Read is accused of backing her SUV into her Boston Police officer boyfriend, John O’Keefe, and leaving him to die in a blizzard in Canton, in 2022. (Pat Greenhouse/The Boston Globe via AP, Pool)

Judge Beverly Cannone looks over the verdict slip

Judge Beverly Cannone looks over the verdict slip the jurors have to fill out when they reach a verdict in Karen Read’s murder trial, Wednesday, June 26, 2024, at Norfolk Superior Court in Dedham, Mass. The defense has asked for some modifications. Read is charged with second-degree murder in the January 2022 death of her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O’Keefe.  (Greg Derr/The Patriot Ledger via AP, Pool)

The jury sat for weeks during a trial that included 74 witnesses and nearly 700 pieces of evidence. 

Prosecutors argued a shouting match turned deadly during a booze-infused fight in January 2022, when Read allegedly backed into O’Keefe with her SUV and left him to die during a nor’easter. 

WATCH: DASHCAM FROM THE NIGHT JOHN O’KEEFE WAS FOUND DEAD

His body was found on the front lawn of an influential family with deep ties to law enforcement and prosecutors. Read claimed that the family framed her for O’Keefe’s death in an elaborate cover-up. 

Advertisement

The deadlocked jury was as torn as the otherwise quiet Boston suburb of Canton. And the opposing jurors weren’t backing down. 

“Despite our commitment to the duty entrusted in us, we find ourselves deeply divided by fundamental differences in our opinions and state of mind,” the jury said before Cannone declared a mistrial.

Since Read wasn’t found guilty or not guilty, here’s what could happen next, according to experts.

Flags, flowers and remembrances flank the headstone of John O'Keefe, a Boston police officer

Flags, flowers and remembrances flank the headstone of John O’Keefe, a Boston police officer, at Blue Hill Cemetery, Thursday, June 27, 2024, in Braintree, Mass. A judge declared a mistrial Monday, July 1, 2024, after jurors deadlocked in the case of O’Keefe’s girlfriend, Karen Read, who was accused of killing him by striking him with her SUV and leaving him in a snowstorm. Prosecutors said in a statement that they intend to retry the case.  (AP Photo/Charles Krupa, File)

Judge Beverly J. Cannone, right, speaks to the defense and prosecution during the Karen Read trial

Before the jury enters, Judge Beverly J. Cannone, right, speaks to the defense and prosecution during the Karen Read trial at the Norfolk Superior Court in Dedham, Mass., Monday, July 1, 2024. (Pat Greenhouse/The Boston Globe via AP, Pool)

Option 1: The case is over, no more charges 

Read beat the charges of second-degree murder, motor vehicle manslaughter while driving under the influence and leaving the scene of a collision causing injury and death because the jury couldn’t come to a unanimous decision, not because they thought they believed she was innocent. 

That puts the ball in the prosecutors’ hands. 

Advertisement

They can choose to end the two-year saga now. 

Karen Read listens as Judge Beverly J. Cannone greets the jury

Karen Read, center, listens as Judge Beverly J. Cannone greets the jury at the start of the third day of deliberations in her murder trial, in Norfolk Superior Court on Thursday, June 27, 2024 in Dedham, Massachusetts. (Pat Greenhouse/The Boston Globe via AP, Pool)

Prosecutor Adam Lally speaks in court during jury selection of the Karen Read trial at Norfolk County Superior Court

Prosecutor Adam Lally speaks in court during jury selection of the Karen Read trial at Norfolk County Superior Court on Thursday, April 18, 2024, in Dedham, Massachusetts. Read, 44, was accused of running into her Boston police officer boyfriend with her SUV in the middle of a nor’easter and leaving him for dead after a night of heavy drinking. (David McGlynn/New York Post via AP, Pool)

Karen Read speaks with lawyers in court during jury selection at Norfolk County Superior Court

Karen Read speaks with lawyers in court during jury selection at Norfolk County Superior Court on Thursday, April 18, 2024 in Dedham, Massachusetts. Read, 44, was accused of running into her Boston police officer boyfriend with her SUV in the middle of a nor’easter and leaving him for dead after a night of heavy drinking.  (David McGlynn/New York Post via AP, Pool)

Option 2: New trial, new jury with same charges

The Norfolk County District Attorney’s Office quickly fired off a statement that said it intends to retry the case. 

And Read’s lawyer, Alan Jackson, said, “We will not stop fighting.”

That puts the two sides on another collision course, although experts pointed out pitfalls that could doom the DA’s office again. 

WATCH: EXPERT REACTS TO PROCTOR’S TESTIMONY AND EXPLAINS ITS FAR-REACHING IMPACT

Advertisement

Daniel Medwed, Northeastern University professor of law and criminal justice, believes the prosecution needs to bring more evidence, if this is the route they choose. 

“I think they might talk a big game in the immediate aftermath about retrying her,” Medwed told Northeastern Global News. 

“But ultimately, unless new evidence emerges, I think it might be a tough hill to climb, and they might not pursue it.”

Karen Read courthouse

Supporters of Karen Read gather outside the courthouse in Dedham, MA on Friday, June 28, 2024. (Patriot Pics/Backgrid for Fox News Digital)

Supporters of Karen Read with signs

Supporters of Karen Read gather outside the courthouse in Dedham, MA on Friday, June 28, 2024. Read faced three charges in the death of her Boston police officer boyfriend John O’Keefe in January 2022. (Patriot Pics/Backgrid for Fox News Digital)

There’s also added layers of complication, with investigations into Massachusetts State Trooper Michael Proctor, whose sexist and vulgar texts may have destroyed the prosecution’s case, as well as an ongoing audit of potential misconduct in the Canton Police Department. 

“You know that trooper’s testimony really blew up in the commonwealth’s face,” Suffolk Law professor Rosanna Cavallaro told NBC 10 Boston. 

Advertisement

“If in fact he is suspended or any kind of consequence for his misconduct, then that’s going to make it really hard for the commonwealth to decide how to present their case.”

GO HERE FOR MORE TRUE CRIME FROM FOX NEWS DIGITAL

Massachusetts State Trooper Michael Proctor testifies during Karen Read's trial, Wednesday, June 12, 2024, in Norfolk Superior Court in Dedham, Mass.

Massachusetts State Trooper Michael Proctor testifies during Karen Read’s trial on Wednesday, June 12, 2024 in Norfolk Superior Court in Dedham, Massachusetts. (Greg Derr/The Patriot Ledger via AP, Pool)

Option 3: New trial, new jury, new charges 

A possible way around some of the potential pitfalls of retrying Read for murder is to file different charges, law expert Shira Diner told Fox News Digital. 

Diner is a lecturer and clinical instructor at Boston University School of Law and the president of the Massachusetts Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. 

7M AND THE DANCING TIKTOK CULT: EXPERT DISCUSSES POPULAR NETFLIX SERIES AND ITS LARGER THREAT

Advertisement
Karen Read speaks with her lawyer as the jury deliberates in her murder trail

Karen Read speaks with her lawyer as the jury deliberates in her murder trail, Wednesday June 26, 2024, at Norfolk Superior Court in Dedham, Mass. (Greg Derr/The Patriot Ledger via AP, Pool)

“(The prosecution) is entirely in control of the charges, so I think they could recharge in a different way,” she said.

What those charges could be remains to be seen, if this is the route the prosecution takes. 

WATCH: DINER EXPLAINS HOW PROCTOR’S TESTIMONY COULD BLOW UP ANOTHER MURDER CASE

For now, the case is over. Read is free. 

Advertisement

The two sides – along with their warring supporters – will retreat into their respective corners of the ring. The families will have to regroup. 

The next court appearance is scheduled for July 22 for a conference.

Read the full article from Here

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Northeast

The kidnapping case of 1-month-old Peter Weinberger from July 4, 1956

Published

on

The kidnapping of 1-month-old Peter Weinberger on July 4, 1956, in Long Island, New York, resulted in new legislation passed by former President Dwight D. Eisenhower during his presidency which allowed federal investigators to become involved in a kidnapping case after 24 hours missing versus the original 7-day waiting period.

In the late afternoon on Independence Day in 1956, Beatrice “Betty” Weinberger wrapped her baby in a blanket and placed him in a carriage on the family’s front porch before going into the home for a few minutes as the child slept.

When she returned to the porch, the carriage was empty and a ransom note was left by a kidnapper.

AMBER ALERTS: WHAT THEY ARE AND WHAT TO DO IF ONE POPS UP ON YOUR PHONE

Angelo LaMarca admitted to kidnapping and killing 1-month-old Peter Weinberger in 1956. (NY Daily News Archive via Getty Images)

Advertisement

The note written in pencil read, “I hate to do this to you, but I am in great trouble,” according to the New York Daily News. It added that the kidnapper was “not asking for a lot of money” but only what he needed and that he was “very serious about this.”

He also threatened to kill the baby at the “first wrong move” and also read that he was sorry for his actions but was desperate for money. The criminal demanded $2,000 in small bills for the return of the baby, according to the FBI’s website. If the ransom was paid, he promised to return the baby “safe and happy” the next day.

He signed the letter “Your baby sitter.”

Weinberger called the Nassau County Police Department, about 35 miles outside of New York City, and her husband, Morris Weinberger, a drug salesman, requested newspapers opt out of reporting on the abduction at the time. However, the New York Daily News included Peter’s story as a front page headline, and reporters immediately surrounded the Weinberger residence.

THE DISAPPEARANCE OF CHARLEY ROSS, THE FIRST KNOWN VICTIM OF KIDNAPPING FOR RANSOM IN US

Advertisement
Peter, Betty, Morris Weinberger home

Peter Weinberger was kidnapped from the front porch of his home as he slept in a carriage outside. (John Drennan/NY Daily News Archive via Getty Images)

Police left a decoy ransom package at the spot, but the kidnapper never showed up to collect it. It was later confirmed, after an arrest was made, that the kidnapper did show up with the infant but was quickly diverted by the commotion outside the home.

The FBI set up a temporary investigation headquarters for the case in Mineola, Long Island, beginning on July 11, 1956, just one day after a second attempt at the ransom money was made by the kidnapper. On July 10, he called the Weinberger home twice demanding $5,000 and provided new instructions as to where to leave the money, but he did not show up to either location.

Police located a bag with a note written in the same handwriting as the first ransom note. It provided a location where the baby could be found “if everything goes smooth [sic].” FBI agents and handwriting experts from the FBI analyzed almost 2 million writing samples, which included many provided by the BMV and probation offices and schools, as well as other federal and state municipalities, according to the FBI website.

On Aug. 23, 1956, Angelo John LaMarca, a truck and taxi driver and Plainview, New York, resident, was arrested for the kidnapping of Peter when police matched his handwriting to the ransom notes.

FOLLOW THE FOX TRUE CRIME TEAM ON X

Advertisement
Peter Weinberger found

Peter Weinberger’s decomposing remains were located by police following Angelo John LaMarca’s arrest. (Sam Platnick/NY Daily News Archive via Getty Images)

Though LaMarca initially denied any connection to the kidnapping, it was later discovered that he was living in a $15,000 home with his wife and two children that he could not afford and admitted to the abduction.

LaMarca also told police he had killed the baby for the sake of his own children as he was in financial debt with loan sharks from Brooklyn. He said that he had been driving around neighborhoods looking for a way to make quick cash and saw Weinberger leave Peter on the porch.

He told police that the day he went to drop off the infant and receive the ransom money, he was scared off by the crowd of reporters and officers and dumped the baby off of a highway, according to the FBI’s website.

The FBI fled to the scene described by LaMarca and found the decomposing remains of Peter. During the trial, where lawyers attempted to plead temporary insanity, it was determined Peter died of asphyxia, starvation and exposure at around 6 weeks old.

Advertisement

LaMarca was tried on kidnapping and murder charges and on Dec. 14, 1956, and found guilty by a jury. He was sentenced to death. Though he appealed a number of times, LaMarca was executed on Aug. 7, 1958, at Sing Sing Prison in Ossining, New York.



Read the full article from Here

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Boston, MA

Breaking down the Boston Bruins preseason opponents for 2024

Published

on

Breaking down the Boston Bruins preseason opponents for 2024


The Boston Bruins will kick off their 2024-25 season on September 22nd with an exciting slate of seven preseason matchups against four different teams. The first of which will occur vs. one of the best teams in the NHL last season, the New York Rangers, at 5 PM on September 22nd.

While the Rangers may not bring their top players to this matchup, and there is a good chance the Bruins won’t either, the game could be a way for fans to see some of the more fringe players in action. That said, the Bruins and Rangers will meet again on September 26th in New York with a 7 PM start time, and there is a good chance that this game could feature a better preview of what to expect in a regular season that should see both teams as among the most competitive in the Eastern Conference. 

On September 24th and October 5th at 7 PM and 5 PM, respectively, the Bruins will face the Washington Capitals, with the game on the 24th occurring at home and the preseason finale on the road. We know the Capitals were that “just happy to be there” playoff team last year, but that shouldn’t be the case in 2024-25. For one of these two games, expect the Bruins to play those “new-look” Capitals best squads.

The Bruins tour against the Metropolitan Division will continue in back-to-back preseason matchups against the Philadelphia Flyers on September 28th on the road and October 1st at home, with both games taking place at 7 PM. Philadelphia nearly became that final playoff team last year, and this season, we don’t know what to expect from them, but the Bruins will likely get a good idea in one of these two matchups. 

Advertisement

Boston will also play the Los Angeles Kings at 7 PM on October 3rd at a neutral site, and LA is a team looking to find more consistency in 2024-25. The Kings did finish third in the Pacific last season, but it didn’t come without a coaching change and some major highs and lows last season. 

Overall, we’re mainly seeing the Bruins get a small tour of the Metropolitan Division, featuring a powerhouse team in the Rangers, an organization that made a lot of moves in the offseason in the Washington Capitals, and a potential up-and-coming organization like the Flyers.



Source link

Continue Reading

Pittsburg, PA

Steelers to Rely on Young Georgia Core

Published

on

Steelers to Rely on Young Georgia Core


The Pittsburgh Steelers will need to rely on their young core of Georgia players during the 2024 season.

The Georgia Bulldogs have had 33 players drafted over the last three years and several NFL organizations have really focused in on drafting former Bulldogs. The Philadelphia Eagles are the most famous example of this, but other teams aren’t too far behind them. The Pittsburgh Steelers have selected a multitude of former Bulldogs over the last few years, and they will have to lean on them this season.

ESPN released an article where they ranked NFL team’s under 25 talent. They also listed the “blue chip players” for each team which is determined by many factors. The Steelers ranked 20th amongst the other teams and two Bulldogs made up their list of blue chips – George Pickens and Broderick Jones. Here is what ESPN wrote:

“The Steelers graduated a starting offensive tackle, Moore, from this list, but he probably won’t have a starting job this season anyway after posting an 87.5% PBWR and 73.8% RBWR. Instead, younger and higher-drafted talents will man the tackle spots, with Jones and first-round pick Troy Fautanu at age 23. Center Zach Frazier is also 23 and will start as a rookie. At wide receiver, 23-year-old Pickens takes over as the unchallenged No. 1 receiver in Pittsburgh after having 1,140 receiving yards in 2023. Also age 23: rookie slot receiver Roman Wilson, nose tackle Keeanu Benton and second tight end Darnell Washington. The one exception when it comes to talent under 25 is No. 1 cornerbackJoey Porter Jr., who turns 24 in late July.”

Advertisement

The Steelers also signed former Georgia running back Daijun Edwards as an undrafted free agent after this year’s draft.

With Georgia stacking up NFL draft classes, organizations will continue to rely on their young Georgia cores to make a difference. But other organzaitions, like the Steelers, will be relying on them more than others.

Other Georgia News:

Join the Community:

Follow Jonathan Williams on Twitter: @Dr_JWill

Subscribe to our YouTube Page HERE.

You can follow us for future coverage by clicking “Follow” on the top right-hand corner of the page. Also, be sure to like us on Facebook @BulldogMaven & follow us on Twitter at @DawgsDaily

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending