Vermont
Vermont legislation banning neonics worries farmers, industry
The seed industry and growers are closely watching legislation in Vermont that would ban corn and soybean seeds treated with neonicotinoids. Critics say it would make it more difficult for growers to control pest pressure and use conservation practices such as no-till and cover crops.
More than that, adoption of the Vermont legislation a year after New York passed a bill on which it is based, has sparked concern that other states will follow suit.
“I think it’s more than likely we’re going to see a bill in Vermont,” said Brad Mitchell, leader of Northeast affairs for neonic manufacturer Syngenta. “And that I think will probably trigger more bills, particularly in the Northeast.”
The debate centers on the impacts of neonics, which are used to coat virtually all corn and most soybean seeds sold nationwide. Supporters of the legislation say research has shown that the insecticides harm bees, both commercial and wild, and birds, leading to declining populations.
“Tiny amounts of neonicotinoid insecticides – 5 to 10 parts per billion – have sublethal effects that doom a colony to death during the coming winter,” the Vermont Beekeepers Association said in a statement arguing for the legislation.
Bill proponents, including environmental groups, point to studies showing little to no economic benefit from neonics. They cite a Cornell University report in 2020 that found “seed treatments benefit farmers when there is high early-season pest pressure, [but] these benefits are limited to a small proportion of fields.”
Testifying on the Vermont bill, Scott McArt, Cornell assistant professor of pollinator health, a co-author of the study, pointed to research showing corn and soybean yields in Canada’s Ontario province, have increased since neonic-treated seeds were banned in 2017. The law nonetheless allows growers to use them when there is a “demonstrated risk of a pest problem,” he said.
Similarly, New York’s law, slated to go into effect in 2029, would allow the state to grant waivers to growers who can show they would face pest threats without neonic-treated seeds. The law also would require growers to complete training in integrated pest management.
Vermont’s bill is modeled on New York’s, and even includes a provision that says the treated seed restrictions won’t go into effect until New York’s law does.
Vermont’s House and Senate have both passed the bill overwhelmingly, suggesting that lawmakers could override a veto if Republican Gov. Phil Scott were to veto it the bill.
In the state House, Rep. Heather Surprenant, a farmer, explained her vote in favor of the legislation by saying that opponents were underestimating farmers’ ability to adapt.
“I voted yes to ensure my future in this industry,” she said.
The American Seed Trade Association cites research by AgInfomatics that found, without seed treatment, “U.S. cropped land would need to increase between 340,000 and 410,000 acres to offset losses in yield and quality, much of which would come from the Conservation Reserve Program, environmentally sensitive land established to preserve water, soil and wildlife.”
Others in the industry also are worried about the impacts on agriculture. Addressing the “pest pressure” issue, Syngenta’s Mitchell said many farmers use the seeds “prophylactically.”
Steve Dwinell, director of public health and the agricultural resource management division in the Vermont Department of Agriculture, said he is concerned about whether there will be enough non-treated seed for growers and about how growers will control pests without them.
“The pest problems have not gone away,” he said. “So if the pests can’t be controlled with the insecticide that’s on the seed, then there’s the possibility that the growers are going to have to use other pesticides to control the pests, which may have a bigger impact on the bees.”
He also points to the Vermont’s continuing loss of farmland. The 1974 Census of Agriculture showed about 1.67 million acres of farmland; the 2022 census shows 1.17 million acres.
“My concern about the restrictions on the use of the seed is that they may increase the production costs, or reduce the ability to produce enough crop,” he says. “And these farms will be under more economic pressure, and then we’ll lose more farms, and then we’ll have fewer resources for pollinators.”
David Degolyer, an agronomist in upstate New York, said the way neonic-treated seeds are applied – in minimal amounts, with precision and at the right time – helps ensure that there is minimal impact to the environment.
He also said that technology such as deflectors is highly effective at preventing dust from being kicked up into the air and spreading beyond the fields.
Degolyer says there is a “legitimate concern” about off-site movement of dust during planting, but that “most of the new planters have that taken care of.” For older planters, he advises, “Just purchase the deflectors. That solves the issue.”
He adds that he’s worried farmers will have to use tillage to bury eggs of seed corn maggots, which are especially fond of organic material such as compost as well as manure, a commodity in ample supply in dairy-rich Vermont.
“The seed corn maggot could be a really huge problem,” he says. “They fly in, they look for cover crops, they look for winter annuals like chickweed” to lay their eggs and start feeding on seeds, he said.
Elson Shields, a retired Cornell entomology professor, has written that “the frequent use of animal manures and cover crops known as green manure crops increases the attractiveness of the fields” to seed corn maggots.
Richard Nelson, a Vermont dairy farmer and corn grower who opposes the bill, says without neonic seeds, farmers would have to turn to older chemistries.
“We can use other stuff in-furrow,” he says. However, he adds, “It’s nasty, and it’s going to have the same effects.”
He and Syngenta’s Mitchell also warn that laws restricting neonic-coated seeds would result in a lack of available seeds.
“The supply chain is pretty complicated.” Mitchell said, making it difficult to start creating specialized seed for different markets.
Mitchell also points to recent recommendations from the state’s Agricultural Innovation Board that focused on research and education on neonics.
“The board recommends actions to further understand the issues within Vermont, help educate growers about practices to limit pest pressure or reduce non-target exposure, and promote ongoing or planned research,” the AIB’s January report on neonics said.
Dwinell says farmers and beekeepers need to communicate to ensure pesticides are not harming bees. “The folks who grow apples or blueberries or vegetables are very careful about when and where they apply pesticides to avoid harming bees,” he said.
Nelson says he believes it’s unlikely that seed companies will adjust to demand just because of laws in New York and Vermont. Together the two states make up a fraction of the corn acres in the U.S. – about 1 million out of about 90 million.
“I’m starting to feel like Davy Crockett in in the Alamo,” said Nelson, who added that he plans to run for the legislature.
“I’m filling out the paperwork right now,” he said May 6.
For more news, go to www.Agri-Pulse.com.
Vermont
Voluntary mergers in Vermont’s new education reform – Valley News
MONTPELIER — After weeks of false starts and discarded plans, the House Education Committee passed an education reform proposal Thursday. But it’s a far cry from what was envisioned in last year’s landmark Act 73, and will almost certainly face political hurdles in the House, Senate and from Gov. Phil Scott’s administration.
The proposal, H.955, which passed with only Democratic support, would create study committees in seven areas of the state to facilitate voluntary mergers of the state’s 119 school districts. Rep. Peter Conlon, D-Cornwall, the House Education Committee chair, praised the committee’s work before calling the vote.
“For the field and school districts and Vermonters out there, we are respecting — I think, very much so — the different ways we deliver education in Vermont,” he said. “We are respecting local voice. We are respecting an aversion to forced mergers at the state level.”
The proposal marks a compromise after weeks of political gridlock among committee members over perennial issues like school choice and preserving local voice in rural communities.
Education reform has consumed much of the political oxygen in the Statehouse this year and last. Gov. Phil Scott, buoyed by Republican electoral gains in the November 2024 election, ushered in plans to consolidate Vermont’s 119 school districts and reform the state’s education finance system.
Leaders in both parties have endorsed plans for reform, citing the ever increasing cost of education and the need to expand access to educational opportunities.
But Thursday’s committee plan is out of step with the more ambitious ideas floated by Scott, his Agency of Education and even Conlon himself, which would have mandated school district mergers. Conlon’s initial plan in February would have forced the merger of the state’s 119 school districts into 27, each with student populations between 2,000 and 4,000.
Yet after several weeks of deadlock, the committee pivoted to a proposal with voluntary mergers. Conlon’s plan for forced mergers “didn’t get a lot of love” from colleagues or constituents, he said.
The Senate, meanwhile, continues to hammer away at the details of their own proposal, which doesn’t look likely to follow Scott’s vision for education reform either.
The House proposal has a long road ahead of it, and will likely change significantly as it proceeds through the House and Senate. Lawmakers in both chambers will scrutinize the plan’s emphasis on voluntary mergers, and question whether the plan could find the types of savings the governor has called for.
“For me, there are misses in this,” Rep. Joshua Dobrovitch, R-Williamstown, said Thursday. “I feel like we’re not actually providing the relief that our taxpayers want in a timely fashion.”
The bill will next be taken up by the House ways and means and appropriations committees.
To merge or not to merge
The House’s proposal borrows from the school redistricting task force, the body created last year to draw up school consolidation maps. That group’s recommendation last fall bucked calls for forced mergers and instead suggested new regional entities that would share services among member school districts.
The proposal advanced Thursday would overlay seven cooperative education service agencies, or CESAs, over the state’s 119 school districts and 52 governing units.
Those regional entities, already in use in southeastern Vermont, would then facilitate the sharing of services in special education, professional development, human resources and other areas for member school districts.
Grants from the Vermont Agency of Education would help stand up those agencies, and they would be managed by a board of directors appointed by member supervisory unions and supervisory districts.
Study committees would then be formed within each CESA, which would work towards a voluntary merger process for member districts. All member school districts would be required to participate in the committees.
The study committees’ work would run through 2027 and 2028. Residents in school districts queued up by the study committees for a merger would then vote on whether to merge.
The law does offer preliminary guidance for how study committees could consider merging districts.
One proposal in the legislation, for example, would have the Addison Central, Addison Northwest and Lincoln school districts merge with the Mount Abraham Unified School District.
Another would see the Franklin Northeast, Northern Mountain Valley and Missisquoi school districts merge into one.
But voters in a district in any proposed merger would have the final say under the legislation.
The legislation would also change the effective date of the foundation formula, moving it back from July 1 2028, to July 1, 2030.
Act 73 will shift spending decisions away from local districts and their communities and to the state via a foundation formula, which would then provide each school district with a set amount of money based on the number of students enrolled.
Policy v. politics
Scott and leaders in his Agency of Education have made it clear they do not support the House’s proposal.
Scott said Wednesday he was “appreciative” of lawmakers moving anything out at all, but the proposal was not something he could accept. He’s previously threatened to veto the state budget if lawmakers don’t follow through on his education reform demands.
“If we end up in the same position that we’ve ended up in years past with increasing property taxes that dysfunction won’t allow us to fix, the voters will decide what to do with that,” he said Wednesday.
Education Secretary Zoie Saunders last Friday told lawmakers in the House Education Committee that the direction of both the House and Senate’s proposals were “concerning.”
“Each of the proposals that are put forward are not fully benefiting from scale. And we know we need to move to scale,” she said. “And if we don’t, the smaller districts will be at an inherent disadvantage.”
In the end, Conlon said he was bound by the political realities in the Statehouse. He said barriers like support for school choice and local control were too difficult to clear.
“The world we are trying to maneuver and move around in is not just policy, it is also politics,” he said.
This story was republished with permission from VtDigger, which offers its reporting at no cost to local news organizations through its Community News Sharing Project. To learn more, visit vtdigger.org/community-news-sharing-project.
Vermont
High gas prices hit Vermonters at the pump, store and heating bill – VTDigger
More than a month into the Iran war, Vermonters are facing the strain of ballooning fuel costs as commuters wince at high prices at the pump.
“It’s painful to the pocketbook,” said David Armstrong, who works in the construction industry, as he filled his truck at a gas station in Burlington on Friday.
Armstrong commutes about 40 miles a day for work, he said, and it cost him over $123 to fill his tank, even with a discount program. That’s a steep increase from the approximately $90 he says he was paying prior to the Iran war.
Fuel costs have risen dramatically across the U.S., but in Vermont, where motorists in more rural communities must travel long distances to get to jobs or to buy essentials, prices for gas and diesel have hit especially hard.
Average gas prices in Vermont have risen to $3.99 per gallon as of April 2, and prices in northern counties like Orleans, Essex, Franklin and Grand Isle have all eclipsed $4, according to AAA’s gas price tracker.
Vermont is just below the national average of $4.08 per gallon, but compared to the rest of New England, only Connecticut has a higher average price.
American households have paid $8.4 billion more for gasoline over the past month compared to prices before the start of the war on Iran, according to analysis by congressional Democrats on the Joint Economic Committee. In response to U.S. and Israeli strikes against Iran, the country closed a vital naval passage between the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman called the Strait of Hormuz, effectively cutting off much of the Middle East’s supply of crude oil and natural gas from the global market.
The average household in Chittenden County uses 575 gallons of gasoline annually, which, if calculated for a year, would cost around $2,300 if Friday’s gas prices went unchanged, according to data from the Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission. Using the approximate cost of gas a year ago, a full year’s worth would cost $1,800, meaning that Chittenden County households would see an increase of $42 a month and around a $500 bump for the year.
Vermonters, who drive more and have fewer alternatives to driving compared to most states, are more exposed to price changes, according to Greg Rowangould, director of the Transportation Research Center and associate professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Vermont.
The Transportation Research Center studied how Vermonters reacted to the last major increase in fuel prices back in 2022 at the start of the war in Ukraine. It found that people across the spectrum, from remote rural communities to Burlington, were forced to cut down on travel. Respondents said they took fewer trips, favored closer destinations and opted to chain tasks together rather than take multiple trips for essentials.
Some drivers decided to cut back on non-essential travel, too, choosing to watch Netflix rather than going on a night out, according to Rowangould.
“There are things that people do to try to avoid the costs,” Rowangould said. “But, of course, you can’t avoid all of it.”
“We’re definitely driving less now,” Dennis DeSilvey said as he and his wife, Kathy, filled their hybrid car on Friday. After a career as a doctor, DeSilvey has to watch his budget much more closely since retiring.
Meanwhile, Sarah McNamara, who works as a substitute teacher in Burlington, said she’s considering switching to commuting by bike or bus if the high prices stick around. She said her husband, who commutes to the Champlain Islands, has started talking with coworkers about carpooling to save money.
“It’s definitely going to be a new budget item, in a different category,” McNamara said of the fuel prices.
Fuel cost increases will also hit homes using heating oil, propane and kerosene, according to Vermont Department of Public Service data.
However, Vermont’s electric utilities mainly use long-term contracts with less exposure to sudden price spikes. New England’s electric grid largely relies on natural gas, nuclear, hydro and other renewable fuel sources, avoiding an immediate impact from global crude prices, according to Philip Picotte, a utilities economic analyst at the Vermont Department of Public Service.
Disruptions in global supply — especially to liquified natural gas — will have some effect on New England’s electric prices in the medium-term, according to Picotte.
Diesel fuel in Vermont has now reached $5.80 per gallon, outpacing the national average of $5.51, according to AAA, which could hit long-haul and delivery trucks especially hard. Diesel is also a main fuel source in dairy and other farming operations throughout the state.
Fuel cost increases absorbed by local businesses would eventually be passed down to the consumer level, explained Ryan Bellavance, the president of Bellavance Trucking, which operates a fleet of nearly 100 trucks based out of Barre. Bellavance transports everything from construction materials to refrigerated food items, so increased costs could be felt across a wide range of products.
Bellavance explained that fuel is already one of their largest expenses. With the recent price increase, it now might be their largest. Compared to the start of the year, prices have increased 31 cents per mile. Multiplied across their operation, that increase quickly becomes problematic.
“It’s gonna be fine until the people stop buying, you know?” he said. “And then everything comes to a halt.”
Vermont
‘Mini truck’ owners show off their wheels at the Vermont Statehouse – VTDigger
Some of Vermont’s smallest haulers were parked outside the Statehouse on Friday to drum up support for a bill that is meant to make registering these so-called mini trucks easier.
“If you asked me everything I like about this truck, I would not be able to stop talking,” said Xavier Stevens of Newport, who brought his 1995 Mazda Scrum — length, just 11 feet — all the way to State Street for the gathering, branded as Mini Truck Day. “It’s the perfect vehicle.”
About a half-dozen other tiny tow-ers lined the street alongside several similarly scaled cars. One was decorated to look like a firetruck — presumably used for putting out very small fires. Under a tent nearby, supporters handed out miniature cupcakes.
While mini-truck owners use their vehicles just like any other truck, their small size and weight, coupled with limited modern safety features, means their legality on the road varies from state to state. The trucks are manufactured in Japan and later imported to the U.S. as used vehicles.
Vermont’s Department of Motor Vehicles allows people to register mini trucks here — and indeed, some at Friday’s event had Vermont license plates. But according to Sen. Becca White, D-Windsor, who’s vice chair of the Senate Transportation Committee, owners have had varying success getting their trucks registered in practice. She said it seems to depend on which DMV location they use.
Enter a portion of this year’s miscellaneous motor vehicle bill, S.326. The legislation would create a new definition of mini trucks, also known as Kei trucks, which White said she hopes will give the DMV more clarity when someone comes in seeking to register one.
The Senate approved the DMV bill last month, and it’s now being considered in the House Transportation Committee. White said she sees “all green lights” ahead for the mini-truck provision in the other chamber.
Stevens, the mini-truck owner, is among those who wasn’t able to get his vehicle registered. Instead, he registered the truck in Montana using a limited liability company he set up in that state, he said.
His truck is painted like a helmet for his favorite NFL team, the New York Giants. It’s an ironic paint job, he acknowledged, given the truck’s small size. A sticker on the back windshield warns that its 650cc engine will work its way from zero to 60 mph … eventually.
One of the best things about Kei trucks, Stevens and others at the event said, is that they are far cheaper than the average truck sold in the U.S., but still offer a decent-sized bed and, in many cases, even have four-wheel drive. Stevens paid just $2,300 for his, including the cost of importing it from Japan.
“So many people in Vermont want a four-wheel-drive pickup truck. So, this market makes that accessible,” said Cristina Shayonye, who met her spouse when they both pulled up to an apple pie festival in Dummerston in the same model of miniature van.
These days, the couple operates a vehicle repair shop in Brattleboro that specializes in tiny vehicles. Both said that on top of the practicality, the trucks are simply a good time.
“I kind of feel like Santa Claus every time I roll up into a parking lot,” Shayonye said. “It just brightens people’s days.”
— Shaun Robinson
In the know
Friday marked the end of the first legislative week for which public access to the Statehouse was limited to a single entrance daily. A combination of Capitol Police officers and sheriff’s deputies were scanning bags and wanding down entrants daily, too. Previously, it had often been just once a week that the loading dock entrance was the only one available.
Agatha Kessler, the sergeant-at-arms, has said it was “very likely” that officials would make the single point of entry permanent before the end of this year’s session. The decision to bolster security was made, in part, over concerns stemming from the assassination of a Minnesota lawmaker and her husband last year, Kessler has said.
— Shaun Robinson
Some of Vermont’s Olympic medalists were out and about in the Statehouse on Friday, part of their celebratory homecoming after this winter’s Milan-Cortina games.
Alpine silver medalist Ryan Cochran-Siegle of Starksboro, Alpine bronze medalist Paula Moltzan of Waitsfield and two-time cross-country silver medalist Ben Ogden of Landgrove were honored in a House resolution. So were gold medalist Alpine racer Mikaela Shiffrin, who trained at Burke Mountain Academy, Stratton-trained cross-country bronze medalist Jessie Diggins, and ski big air silver medalist Mac Forehand, of Winhall.
Current and former Olympians — both medalists and competitors — toured the Golden Dome with Rep. Jed Lipsky, I-Stowe, who commended Vermont’s winter sports excellence in a floor speech.
— Ethan Weinstein
On the trail
Newbury resident Susan Culp is running as an independent for the Caledonia-Orange House seat, she announced this week. Culp serves as the Newbury Selectboard chair.
That House seat is held by Newbury Rep. Joe Parsons, who is listed on the Legislature’s website as an independent and has previously run as a Republican.
And Rep. Elizabeth Burrows, D-West Windsor, announced last month that she’s running for Senate. A vacancy in the three-seat Windsor County district opened up after Democratic Sen. Alison Clarkson said earlier this year she would not seek reelection.
— Ethan Weinstein
-
South-Carolina7 days agoSouth Carolina vs TCU predictions for Elite Eight game in March Madness
-
Education1 week agoVideo: Transgender Athletes Barred From Women’s Olympic Events
-
Miami, FL1 week agoJannik Sinner’s Girlfriend Laila Hasanovic Stuns in Ab-Revealing Post Amid Miami Open
-
Minneapolis, MN1 week agoBoy who shielded classmate during school shooting receives Medal of Honor
-
Vermont7 days ago
Skier dies after fall at Sugarbush Resort
-
Politics7 days agoTrump’s Ballroom Design Has Barely Been Scrutinized
-
Atlanta, GA7 days agoFetishist ‘No Kings’ protester in mask drags ‘Trump’ and ‘JD Vance’ behind her wheelchair
-
Entertainment3 days agoInside Ye’s first comeback show at SoFi Stadium