Connect with us

Vermont

Vermont leaders respond to high court’s abortion ruling

Published

on

Vermont leaders respond to high court’s abortion ruling


Vermont leaders instantly responded to the U.S. Supreme Court docket’s determination Friday to overturn the long-standing Roe v. Wade determination, which can now prohibit abortion rights for thousands and thousands of ladies throughout the nation.

U.S. Sen. Patrick Leahy: At this time’s opinion from a slender majority of the Court docket shouldn’t be the top of abortion. It’s the finish of a lady’s proper to secure reproductive well being care. It’s the finish of ladies’s selection. It units us again. It doesn’t transfer us ahead. What message does this ship to ladies? That their selection — that their proper to control their our bodies — doesn’t matter? That politicians know higher?

State legislatures can’t write their approach via the myriad of circumstances that may come up for ladies in being pregnant. These states, although, say at present that they know finest. The Court docket, at present, says that these state legislatures know finest. No, not the 163 million ladies on this nation. Not a lady about her personal physique. Authorities is aware of finest.

Advertisement

People come to courtroom to seek out justice. To seek out safety below the legislation. At this time, the Supreme Court docket abandons that function. I concern for what it means for the progress we have now fought onerous to realize. For our extra good union. For generations to return.

Lucy Leriche, Vice President of Public Affairs at Deliberate Parenthood Vermont Motion Fund: By overturning Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court docket has now formally given politicians permission to regulate what we do with our our bodies, deciding that we will not be trusted to find out the course for our personal lives. This harmful and chilling determination could have devastating penalties throughout the nation, forcing folks to journey a whole bunch, typically 1000’s, of miles for care or stay pregnant. In Vermont, you possibly can nonetheless entry an abortion at present.

Vermont is taking a daring step to guard reproductive rights right here at dwelling, the place we’re working to move the Reproductive Liberty Modification in November. The Reproductive Liberty Modification would amend Vermont’s structure to guard each particular person’s proper to make their very own reproductive selections, like whether or not and when to grow to be pregnant, use non permanent or everlasting contraception, or search abortion care with out interference from politicians. If handed, it should shield these rights long-term.

It’s a darkish day for our nation, however that is removed from over. We is not going to compromise on our our bodies, our dignity, or our freedom. Vermonters ought to know that Deliberate Parenthood will at all times struggle for you, and we is not going to again down. Collectively, we are going to shield our freedoms.”

Vermont Proper to Life: Constitutional consultants on each side of the talk over abortion have lengthy criticized the Roe determination as having created a proper that didn’t exist and for broadly over reaching their jurisdiction.  These errors have been corrected at present.

Advertisement

The overturning of Roe v. Wade has no impact on abortion in Vermont. In Vermont, abortion has been authorized for the reason that 1972 Vermont Supreme Court docket case in Beecham v. Leahy.  In 2019, Act 47 created a statute that additional protects limitless, unregulated abortion via all 9 months of being pregnant irrespective of the US Supreme Court docket determination in Dobbs.

“Extremist proponents of abortion rights in Vermont will use the Supreme Court docket determination to try to rally help for passage of Proposal 5/Article 22,” acknowledged Mary Hahn Beerworth, Govt Director of Vermont Proper to Life. “Proponents should not be allowed to mislead Vermonters into believing that ‘Article 22 is required,’ or that the modification merely ‘codifies Roe v. Wade,’ when the truth is the modification far exceeds the holding in Roe.”

U.S. Rep. Peter Welch: The selection to finish a being pregnant is private. It is a selection that needs to be made by a affected person, with her physician, and her family members, not by the unelected members of any courtroom or by an elected official. The overturning of Roe v Wade by the Supreme Court docket is the most important assault on ladies’s rights in a era and can rob ladies of their proper to chart their very own futures, for themselves and for his or her households. This determination is a shame. I’m offended, and I’m apprehensive for the well being and wellbeing of ladies throughout this nation who’re not assured their reproductive freedom. 

However we can’t be consumed by despair. Now we have to maintain preventing to guard abortion entry for all American ladies, no matter the place they reside. Meaning codifying the best to secure and authorized abortion by passing the Ladies’s Well being Safety Act within the Senate. To try this, we should overturn the filibuster, in order that the Senate can lastly mirror the need of the vast majority of People and make sure the proper to secure and authorized abortion.

I can’t surrender this struggle. I’ll stand shoulder-to-shoulder with ladies throughout the nation to revive abortion rights nationwide.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Vermont

Scott’s plan to cut school spending worries some educators

Published

on

Scott’s plan to cut school spending worries some educators


MONTPELIER, Vt. (WCAX) – Vermont educators are leery of plans from Gov. Phil Scott to control costs in Vermont’s education system. In Thursday’s inaugural address, Scott pitched sweeping plans to rein in spending which has led to skyrocketing property tax rates.

Last year, one-third of Vemont’s school budgets failed and voters sent more Republicans to Montpelier in years in what some dubbed a tax revolt.

Democrats say everything should be on the table to fix the tax troubles, but some in the education community remain wary.

In his address, the governor outlined a multiyear plan to overhaul how we fund public schools and rein in the cost of spending which has skyrocketed to $2.3 billion.

Advertisement

“In too many districts, teachers aren’t paid enough, administrators are tied up in bureaucracy, schools have too much empty space and many are in disrepair,” said Scott, R-Vermont.

He proposes consolidating dozens of school districts and supervisory unions, putting guardrails on local school spending and completely rewriting the school funding formula with the aim of cutting back on staff and the 80% of school costs that go to wages and benefits.

But some in Vermont’s education community see it another way.

“We have to be clear what is the problem we’re trying to solve. We’re not spending too much money in public education; we’re having a difficult time funding it,” said Don Tinney the executive director of the Vermont NEA.

The Vermont teachers union contends the state has enough taxing capacity to fund schools and students’ complex needs. But they say the state should instead fund schools through state and income tax instead of a property tax.

Advertisement

“We believe the income tax is the fairest way of doing that because people are paying what they can afford to pay,” Tinney said.

As for the funding formula, Scott argues more affluent towns that can afford higher property taxes spend more and approve their local budgets, which drives up costs in the statewide education fund.

“Those higher spenders can actually increase the rates of those districts whose kids and teachers are getting less,” Scott said.

The governor is expected to introduce a formula where districts are paid a flat rate and any additional spending would have to be raised locally.

But some worry that will lead to inequitable opportunities for kids.

Advertisement

“There are states that use foundation formulas to keep poor people poor and drive down public education costs and allow for more opportunities for private schools and school choice schemes. I can’t see Vermont allowing that to happen,” said Jay Nichols of the Vermont Principals’ Association.

Vermonters are still staring down a 6% property tax increase if school budgets as drafted pass on Town Meeting Day.

Scott says in the weeks ahead, he will unveil ideas to hold taxpayers harmless and keep taxes flat.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Vermont

Vermont expected to get light snow Saturday. Here’s the forecast

Published

on

Vermont expected to get light snow Saturday. Here’s the forecast


Wintry weather spreads across the South

Significant snow and icy precipitation are moving from Texas to the Carolinas.

Following a week of cold temperatures and harsh winds, this weekend will see light snow across New England, including Vermont.

While the snow is expected to cover the entire state of Vermont, this weekend’s snowfall will be calm, with no strong winds to create a storm and only a small amount of accumulation.

Advertisement

Here’s what to know about the timing, location and effects of Saturday’s snowfall in Vermont.

Where in VT will it snow Saturday?

According to the National Weather Service (NWS) of Burlington, light snow is expected throughout the day on Saturday, with the greatest chances of snow in the morning. Most areas of the state will see one inch of snowfall, with two inches possible in the middle region of the state.

While Vermont has seen extremely strong winds over this past week, the wind is expected to die down Friday night and stay mild throughout the snow Saturday. As of right now, the NWS has not issued any hazards or warning for Saturday, as the snowfall is expected to be calm.

Advertisement

VT weather next week

Temperatures will stay in the 20s throughout the weekend, with slightly warmer temperatures coming in next week. Snow showers are expected overnight from Monday to Tuesday.



Source link

Continue Reading

Vermont

Committee leadership in the Vermont Senate sees major overhaul – VTDigger

Published

on

Committee leadership in the Vermont Senate sees major overhaul – VTDigger


Sen. Chris Mattos, R-Chittenden North, center, speaks with Sen. Andrew Perchlik, D/P-Washington, at the Statehouse in Montpelier on Thursday, Jan. 9. Photo by Glenn Russell/VTDigger

Nine of the Vermont Senate’s 11 standing committees will have new leaders this biennium and three will be helmed by Republicans, Lt. Gov. John Rodgers announced from the Senate floor Thursday afternoon.

The committee overhaul follows the retirement, death or defeat of a considerable number of veteran chairs last year — and after Republicans picked up six seats in the 30-member body in November’s election. Democrats and Progressives now hold 17 seats, while Republicans control 13.

Unlike the Vermont House, where committee positions are chosen unilaterally by the speaker, Senate assignments are doled out by a three-member panel, the Committee on Committees, which this year includes two new participants: Rodgers, a Republican, and Sen. Ginny Lyons, D-Chittenden Southeast. Senate President Pro Tempore Phil Baruth, D/P-Chittenden Central, returned to the committee. 

The trio had few experienced senators from which to choose, given that — as Baruth noted in his opening remarks to the chamber Wednesday — nearly two-thirds of the Senate’s members joined the body over the past two years. Illustrating the point, newly sworn-in Sen. Seth Bongartz, D-Bennington, was tapped to chair the Senate Education Committee. (Bongartz had previously served in the House since 2021 — and had tours of duty in both the House and Senate in the 1980s.)

Advertisement

Perhaps the most significant appointment went to Sen. Andrew Perchlik, D/P-Washington, who will chair the powerful Senate Appropriations Committee. He succeeds Sen. Jane Kitchel, D-Caledonia, who retired after leading the budget-writing panel for 14 years.  

Sen. Nader Hashim, D-Windham, will helm the Senate Judiciary Committee, following the death last June of veteran Sen. Dick Sears, D-Bennington. 

The Senate Natural Resources & Energy Committee will be led by Sen. Anne Watson, D/P-Washington. Its former chair, Sen. Chris Bray, D-Addison, was defeated in November. 

Republicans flip six seats in the Vermont Senate, shattering Democratic supermajority


Advertisement

Sen. Alison Clarkson, D-Windsor, takes over the Senate Economic Development, Housing & General Affairs Committee from Sen. Kesha Ram Hinsdale, D-Chittenden Southeast. Ram Hinsdale defeated Clarkson for the role of Senate majority leader in November, requiring the former to step down from her committee leadership position and allowing the latter to step up. 

The three Republicans chairing panels are Sen. Richard Westman, R-Lamoille, who will run the Senate Transportation Committee; Sen. Russ Ingalls, R-Essex, who will head the Senate Agriculture Committee; and Sen. Brian Collamore, R-Rutland, who will lead the Senate Government Operations Committee. (Republicans similarly made gains in House leadership positions this year.)

Sen. Wendy Harrison, D-Windham, takes over the Senate Institutions Committee from Ingalls, who chaired it last biennium. 

The sole returning chairs are Lyons, who will continue to lead the Senate Health & Welfare Committee, and Sen. Ann Cummings, D-Washington, who will retain control of the Senate Finance Committee. 

Advertisement

Speaking to reporters Thursday afternoon, Baruth said the Committee on Committees had intentionally sought partisan equilibrium on certain panels. The Senate Education Committee, for example, which is expected to engage in heavy lifting as lawmakers reconsider the state’s education funding scheme, includes three Democrats and three Republicans. For a bill to clear that panel, four members would have to approve.

“What I intended for that committee… to do is to put out bipartisan bills,” Baruth said of Senate Ed. 

Similarly, Baruth called the composition of the tax-writing Senate Finance Committee “very centrist,” with four Democrats and three Republicans. 

“They’re going to have a lot of work to do, hard work, but the one thing I want them to think — to think long and hard about — is any kind of raising taxes or fees,” Baruth said. “The only time I’m looking to do that, if it’s necessary, is if it brings down the property tax.”

Ethan Weinstein contributed reporting.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending