Connect with us

Vermont

Vermont Construction Company cited for housing workers in 'grossly hazardous and unsafe' living conditions – VTDigger

Published

on

Vermont Construction Company cited for housing workers in 'grossly hazardous and unsafe' living conditions – VTDigger


The town of Colchester has issued several violations against the Vermont Construction Company for housing company workers in “grossly hazardous and unsafe” spaces.

The company was issued an emergency order to vacate a portion of its office space at Hegeman Avenue last week. Part of the building was being used to house an estimated 17 people “despite having no approvals for life safety features for human occupancy of a public building,” the town’s complaint reads.

Town zoning and state fire marshal officials who visited the building last week said the property was “structurally unsafe,” with no smoke or carbon monoxide detectors, no fire extinguishers and several electrical violations, according to the complaint.

The emergency order was posted to the Colchester Selectboard’s upcoming meeting agenda scheduled for Tuesday. Town manager Aaron Frank said in an email that the violations were “concerning enough from a life and safety perspective to include” in the agenda.

Advertisement

It’s the second time in recent months that Colchester has cited the company for housing its workers in unsafe and unpermitted housing. In September, town and state fire marshal officials found that 60 people were living in similar conditions in a house at 28 Vermont Avenue.

Tenants, who officials said were seasonal workers employed by the company, were living in small, congregate sleeping areas, in bunk beds and in some cases on air mattresses.

Like the Hegeman Avenue property, there were no sprinkler or fire alarm systems in place, which the state requires when more than 10 people are housed in a single space, according to Robert Sponable, the deputy director of the Vermont Division of Fire Safety.

28 Vermont Avenue in Colchester on Monday, December 9. Photo by Glenn Russell/VTDigger

Visible mold was found at the Vermont Avenue home, with no carbon monoxide alarms and broken smoke detectors, officials said.

Cathyann LaRose, Colchester’s planning and zoning director, said that property was also issued an emergency order to vacate in September and has remained empty since then. She described the property as “derelict.”

Advertisement

“It is far from habitable, so nobody can live there — not without a significant amount of work and quite a bit of approval,” she said.

In an emailed statement, Dana Kamencik, one of the owners of Vermont Construction Company, said the company was “working closely with the appropriate authorities to address these issues and ensure compliance moving forward.”

The company, he said, was a “young and growing business.” He added that, “While we are still gaining experience, we take the recent violations in Colchester very seriously.” The company was incorporated in early 2016, according to the Better Business Bureau.

Vermont Construction Company owns at least four other residential properties in the county, including two in Williston, one in Essex Town, and one in Shelburne, according to business filings.

According to LaRose and town records, the company moved tenants from the Vermont Avenue property to a similar residential property it owns in Williston after the violations were issued against the Colchester property.

Advertisement

Sponable said the state had identified “issues that we’re working through” at both the Shelburne and Essex properties but it hadn’t identified hazardous conditions similar to those observed in Colchester. 

“We understand the housing issues and the housing shortages — the last thing we want to do is put anybody out on the street,” Sponable said. “But we do everything that we possibly can to make these buildings safe, or at least safe enough for them to be in there until these other issues can be corrected.”

Dormitory-style living is more common in areas closer to ski resorts, which employ seasonal workers, Sponable said.

“But most of the ski areas, they have buildings that they’ve built that are set up more like a college dormitory,” he said. “The building’s got a sprinkler system and a fire alarm system and things like that.”

Vermont Construction Company purchased a single-family home at 281 Hedgerow Drive in Shelburne to house company employees, according to state fire marshal inspection records. At one point it had 15 residents.

Advertisement

That property has since racked up several violations, including failing to provide sprinkler and fire alarm systems, according to state fire marshal records.

A follow-up inspection on Sept. 20 found that, because sleeping quarters had undersized windows, the rooms “cannot be occupied at this time.”

A representative for the company told fire marshal officials at the time “that the plan is to find new housing for the majority of the residents, leaving two staff to rehab the house,” according to inspection records from May.

The property has since generated numerous written complaints from residents, and police have an extensive call log originating from the property, Shelburne Town Manager Matt Lawless said in an interview on Monday.

182 Hegeman Avenue in Colchester on Monday, December 9. Photo by Glenn Russell/VTDigger

“There have been quite a number of complaints on it and those have continued over the better part of a year,” he said.

The complaints center around parking, late-night noise, and trash build-up outside of the property, but Lawless said the town has not chosen to issue violations against the property.

Advertisement

“The balance that they have to strike is, what rises to the level of disorderly conduct or disturbing the peace,” he said, “because there’s a set of things that you may do at home… that I think is annoying, but that is within your rights as a neighbor.”

Police haven’t issued any citations against the property, according to Shelburne dispatcher James Mack.

The company owns two more properties in Williston and one at 235 River Road in Essex Town, but it is not clear whether these properties are used to house company workers.

Sharon Kelley, the zoning administrator and health officer for Essex Town, said in an email that there have been several verbal complaints about trash build up at the property on River Road, but said no violations have been issued.

In Williston, residents have similarly complained of trash at 192 Aspen Lane in emails to VTDigger. The company also owns a residential property on White Birch Lane.

Advertisement

Kamenick did not respond to an interview request, and did not respond to a follow-up email with detailed questions on Monday afternoon, but said in his initial email that the company “would respond to any complaints promptly.”

“We view community feedback as a critical part of our growth, and we are committed to resolving any concerns and continuing to build trust with the people we serve,” he said.





Source link

Advertisement

Vermont

Vermont knocks off Western New England 75-68

Published

on

Vermont knocks off Western New England 75-68





Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Vermont

These Vermonters are about to lose their Medicare Advantage plans and they’re scrambling

Published

on

These Vermonters are about to lose their Medicare Advantage plans and they’re scrambling


Angela Myers doesn’t know what she’s going to do. 

The 54-year-old from Chittenden County lives with a disability. When she needed better health insurance, she said her doctors recommended Vermont Blue Advantage, a type of Medicare provided by Blue Cross Blue Shield that could offer her extra benefits and reduced costs.  

She’s been on the plan for five years, she said, and it covers all her frequent doctor visits and monthly prescriptions. 

But she’s going to lose that insurance soon. 

Advertisement

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Vermont announced Oct. 1 that it would drop Medicare Advantage coverage in 2026, leaving the thousands of Vermonters like Meyers scrambling to secure new plans before the turn of the year. Vermont Blue Advantage covers over 26,000 people in Vermont, the company told the Burlington Free Press, and has more complete coverage than traditional Medicare, including dental work and prescriptions.  

The company, which is paid by the government to run the program, says it costs too much. The “Vermont Medicare Advantage market is unsustainable for Vermont Blue Advantage to be able to offer reasonably priced and affordable products to serve as an alternative to traditional Medicare coverage,” Blue Cross Blue Shield of Vermont said when announcing the plan.  

That’s been the national trend, with Medicare Advantage plans whittled down across many states. But for a low-population place like Vermont, the disruption for people is magnified. 

A big problem with choosing a new Medicare Advantage plan is that there just aren’t many offered in Vermont. The same day Vermont Blue Advantage announced its cut, UnitedHealthcare did the same. United, itself one of the largest purveyors of Medicare Advantage plans across the country, serves almost 8,000 Vermonters, the company told the Free Press.   

Advertisement

Medicare Advantage plans in Vermont

As of September, over 51,600 Vermonters were insured by a Medicare Advantage plan, and over 168,000 people were eligible, government data shows.   

Advantage plans are run by private companies but funded by the federal government. They are for people 65 and older or who have a disability. More than half of U.S. residents eligible for Medicare Advantage are insured under it, according to KFF, a national health care reporting and research outfit.  

Vermonters skew under that trend at 34% for 2024, KFF reported. But the number has been rising. A decade prior, only 7% of eligible Vermonters used an Advantage plan.  

Even so, the options are slimming. Insurance plans shuttering has become almost an annual tradition in Vermont. Two Advantage plans — operated by MVP and WellCare — folded this past January.  

Advertisement

Come next year, the only option for those seeking an individual Medicare Advantage plan is Humana, which serves Bennington, Caledonia, Essex, Orange, Windam and Windsor counties, or less than half the counties in Vermont.  

People losing health insurance feel ‘abandoned’

Larry Mindell of Williston said he and his wife signed up with Vermont Blue Advantage after MVP cancelled its coverage. He said they feel “abandoned” by the companies and worry this may only be the beginning of a sharper downturn.  

“I say ‘abandon’ because that’s what it feels like, and it’s happening to us for the second year in a row,” Mindell said. 

Mindell has been working with an insurance broker to find a new plan, but that’s not an option everyone has.  

Some were able to be proactive in changing their plans. The Vermont Treasurer’s Office announced Sept. 11 that starting next year, retired teachers receiving health insurance from Vermont Blue Advantage will be covered by equivalent plans from HealthSpring.   

Advertisement

The change will impact over 7,000 retirees and beneficiaries in Vermont, says the Treasurer’s Office. The decision came after Vermont Blue Advantage proposed a 50% premium increase in July, and it proved to be a good one as Blue Cross Blue Shield pulled the plan altogether just a few months later.   

Other people were not prepared to lose their insurance.  

Frankin County resident Barb Fichter has been living in Vermont since 2022 and said it took her a few years to find an Advantage plan she was happy with before choosing Blue Cross Blue Shield’s offering in January 2024.  

Now, she’s back to where she started. 

“It’s so disconcerting to wade through alternatives, and I fear I may just be on regular Medicare with no prescription drug coverage or dental coverage,” Fichter said. “I’m going to have to weigh out which things I’m going to have to give up because I can’t afford the costs or co-pays.”

Advertisement

When is Medicare open enrollment? Special enrollment if you’re losing coverage?

The annual open enrollment period for choosing new Medicare plans runs from Oct. 15 through Dec. 7. There is a special enrollment period for those who will be losing coverage, allowing them until March 4 to find a new plan. 

But as the current plans end by Jan. 1, 2026, people will have a gap in coverage if they wait to sign up for a new one.   

Sydney P. Hakes is the Burlington city reporter. Contact her at SHakes@gannett.com. 



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Vermont

Vermont Yankee will be ’99 percent demolished’ by the end of the year

Published

on

Vermont Yankee will be ’99 percent demolished’ by the end of the year


VERNON — The demolition of the Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant will be “99 percent complete” by the end of the year, according to a recent estimate from the chief executive officer of Yankee’s owner, NorthStar Group Services.

Scott State, in a telephone interview from his home in Arizona, said that crews have been making good progress in this fall’s good weather, and the reactor building’s wall and interior would be down to the ground by Thanksgiving.

According to recent photographs of the reactor building, there are still concrete walls standing. At one point this fall, two large excavators, which had to be hoisted to the top of the reactor building by a super-large crane, were tearing the building apart, from the top down.

Advertisement

“We plan to have it down to ground level within the next four weeks,” he said.

According to the memorandum of understanding NorthStar has with the state of Vermont, it must remove all structures that are within four feet of ground level, and that will take until Christmas, State said.

The concrete is very thick in the foundation, about two to three feet thick. He estimated the foundation goes 40 to 50 feet into the ground, but the vast majority of it would be left in place.

The company has until 2030 to complete the decommissioning of the Yankee site, and has long said the job would be complete by the end of 2026, but that most work would be done by 2025.

State said all the concrete rubble from the reactor building is being stored on site, but will eventually be shipped to west Texas, at the low-level radioactive waste facility run by NorthStar’s partner, Waste Services.

Advertisement

After the reactor building’s demolition is complete, the concrete will be shipped over a six-month period, State said. He said there is only room for two rail cars at a time to be loaded at the Yankee site.

“Mid-summer, next fall, all that stuff will be gone,” he said.

NorthStar, which bought the Vermont Yankee plant from former owner Entergy Nuclear in January 2019, actually started decommissioning several months before the sale was completed and approved by state and federal regulators.

NorthStar’s plans called for immediately demolition, rather than putting the plant into what essentially is cold storage, the plan adopted by Entergy. Under that plan, no work would have been done at Yankee for decades.

State said that additional field work, site assessments, sampling, studies and reports will take up the rest of 2026, when the company will seek final approval from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Advertisement

With the government shut down and continued understaffing at the NRC, State said that approval could take longer than originally expected.

Recent soil testing near the reactor building revealed contamination of PFAS or “forever chemicals,” at significantly above Vermont standards. That contamination is believed to have come from a fire at the plant’s electrical transformer in 2004, on the non-nuclear side of the plant.

The reactor building, which is the last major building left at the 140-acre site, was almost as big underground as it was above ground, State said. The reactor building, which housed the reactor core plus the spent fuel pool, was about five stories high.

The reactor building is located next to the storage site of the radioactive spent fuel from the 42 years the plant operated. The spent fuel is stored in giant concrete and steel casks, and it will remain after decommissioning is completed.

According to the state memorandum, the deep foundation may be left in place after testing shows it is clear of any radioactivity.

Advertisement

NorthStar agreed that the reactor foundation hole would not be filled with the rubbleized concrete from the demolition, but “clean fill,” State said, which will be trucked in to the Vernon site.

He said the other nuclear decommissioning project NorthStar is doing, Crystal River 3 in Florida, will use its rubble-ized concrete for fill, which State said is standard practice – but not in Vermont.

“We will not backfill until the NRC releases the site,” he said.

There are two large trust funds paying for the demolition and clean up work. The second, smaller fund will pay for site restoration. The larger $600 million fund was paid for by the utility customers of the original owner of Vermont Yankee, the Vermont Nuclear Power Corp.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending