Connect with us

Vermont

Vermont allows people who are incarcerated to vote. Data shows they don’t

Published

on

Vermont allows people who are incarcerated to vote. Data shows they don’t


Burlington resident Jason Trombley, 41, mentioned he’s by no means voted — it has never been a precedence.

From 2019 to 2021, whereas Trombley was incarcerated at Northern State Correctional Facility in Newport, he mentioned he was keen on casting a poll. However, when he sat all the way down to do it, the method to get from checking a field to really having that vote counted felt too onerous.

“It was type of a ache the best way they do it. They simply had our case employee give us an absentee poll and we needed to fill it out and mail it,” he mentioned. “The whole lot is as much as you. You even have to purchase your personal envelope to mail it out half the time. It’s loopy.”

Vermont is one in every of two states, plus the District of Columbia, that enables incarcerated folks to vote. However information present only a fraction of those that are incarcerated use that proper.

Advertisement

“Simply having the fitting to vote just isn’t the top of the story,” mentioned Ariel White, a political science professor on the Massachusetts Institute of Know-how. “Even after folks have that proper, they won’t handle to make use of it, or they won’t resolve to make use of it for quite a lot of causes.”

In late 2021, White co-authored a research that examined how typically folks in Vermont vote whereas incarcerated. She discovered the hole between most people and those that are incarcerated was large.

In 2016, the information confirmed about 13% of incarcerated Vermonters voted, in comparison with 65% of all eligible residents. Whereas turnout is traditionally decrease throughout midterm elections, in 2018, they discovered solely about 8% of incarcerated people voted — in comparison with 55% of most people.

That’s regardless of Vermont taking steps to attempt to make voting whereas incarcerated accessible, she mentioned.

“Vermont is already doing loads of issues that different locations don’t do, and we nonetheless see these very low numbers,” White mentioned.

Advertisement

“Vermont is already doing loads of issues that different locations don’t do, and we nonetheless see these very low numbers.”

Ariel White, professor of political science at MIT

Organizations just like the League of Ladies Voters and Incapacity Rights Vermont are allowed into prisons 90 days earlier than election day to speak about voting with incarcerated people.

Tina Hagen, with Incapacity Rights Vermont, mentioned in her expertise visiting correctional amenities, she heard loads of misinformation.

“We discovered that the message wasn’t getting on the market to prisoners,” Hagen mentioned. “And so there was loads of misinformation when a prisoner would ask a employees particular person inside corrections about voting — it was simply assumed you couldn’t vote since you have been in jail.”

Hagen and others attempt to make it extra clear by explaining the election course of and tips on how to request an absentee poll. Some teams additionally register folks to vote.

Advertisement

Extra from VPR Information: Vt. lawmakers and city officers debate the way forward for the closed Windsor jail

Chris Barton is the restorative methods administrator for the Vermont Division of Corrections. He says DOC tries to stay impartial in relation to voting.

“We don’t incentivize it in any method, or disincentivize it in any method,” Barton mentioned. “So we wish it to be as freed from course of as potential with out correctional management. We do every little thing we will to make of us conscious, after which it’s their duty to observe via.”

However, he mentioned, there are many the explanation why the follow-through might not occur.

“With any voter engagement course of, the extra boundaries there are to voting, the harder or the much less participation that may occur,” he mentioned. “So, simply having an absentee poll might stop some of us from voting.”

Advertisement

“The whole lot is as much as you. You even have to purchase your personal envelope to mail it out half the time. It’s loopy.”

Jason Trombley, describing attempting to vote whereas incarcerated in Vermont

That concept — that extra boundaries lowers participation — impacts everybody, in line with Alec Ewald, an affiliate professor within the political science division on the College of Vermont.

Ewald factors out that this impact is very pronounced when you’re incarcerated.

“So, when you consider any person who’s incarcerated, voting for them could be much more pricey, as a result of buying details about tips on how to do it, ‘how do I register,’” he mentioned. “After which there’s all these different questions on when election time comes round, how will I resolve tips on how to vote on the problems if my entry to data is actually restricted.”

Ewald mentioned some people who find themselves incarcerated can also be turned off from voting as a result of their previous experiences with the federal government.

Advertisement

“Their expertise with the federal government is that every one it does is police them and mistreat them, and they also say, ‘To hell with it, I don’t need something to do with the federal government. It does nothing for me, it solely does issues to me, and there’s nothing I can achieve from collaborating on this sham exercise,’” he mentioned.

Ewald mentioned Vermont might enhance its voting participation inside its correction amenities by encouraging extra dialog about politics and the civic course of.

“Individuals have opinions, and I feel having these conversations would possibly result in extra folks taking an curiosity in voting,” he mentioned.

Extra from VPR Information: Vt. Prisons Used Lockdowns To Gradual Coronavirus, However Prisoners’ Psychological Well being Suffered

Ariel White, the MIT professor who not too long ago carried out a research on voter participation, mentioned it is essential to listen to from these immediately impacted by the legal justice system, particularly at a time when lawmakers think about coverage modifications.

Advertisement

“I fear in regards to the lack of that information, that experience, that perception, once we’re making insurance policies going ahead,” she mentioned.

Jason Trombley, who was incarcerated in Newport, mentioned from his perspective, even simply making the method simpler — bypassing the mail for instance — might assist.

“If they might have it arrange so you may simply go to your case employee’s workplace and do it on-line or one thing, that may be the simplest method or do it,” he mentioned.

This story was dropped at us via a partnership with the Group Information Service, a venture of the College of Vermont’s Reporting & Documentary Storytelling program.

Have questions, feedback or suggestions? Ship us a message or get in contact by tweeting us @vprnet.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Vermont

Vermont Sued for New Law Requiring Big Oil to Pay for Climate Damage | Common Dreams

Published

on

Vermont Sued for New Law Requiring Big Oil to Pay for Climate Damage | Common Dreams


The US Chamber of Commerce and the American Petroleum Institute – representing the biggest fossil fuel companies in the world – are suing the State of Vermont over its new law requiring fossil fuel companies to pay a share of the state’s damage caused by climate change.

The lawsuit, filed last Monday in the US District Court for the District of Vermont, asks a state court to prevent Vermont from enforcing the law passed last year. Vermont became the first state in the country to enact the law after it suffered over $1 billion in damages from catastrophic summer flooding and other extreme weather.

Vermont’s Attorney General’s Office said as of Friday, Jan. 3, they had not been served with the lawsuit.

The lawsuit argues that the U.S. Constitution precludes the act and that the federal Clean Air Act preempts state law. It also claims that the law violates domestic and foreign commerce clauses by discriminating “against the important interest of other states by targeting large energy companies located outside of Vermont.”

Advertisement

The Chamber and the American Petroleum Institute argue that the federal government is already addressing climate change. Because greenhouse gases come from billions of individual sources, they claim it has been impossible to measure “accurately and fairly” the impact of emissions from a particular entity in a specific location over decades.

“For too long, giant fossil fuel companies have knowingly lit the match of climate disruption without being required to do a thing to put out the fire,” Paul Burns, executive director of the Vermont Public Interest Research Group, said in a statement. “Finally, maybe for the first time anywhere, Vermont is going to hold the companies most responsible for climate-driven floods, fires and heat waves financially accountable for a fair share of the damages they’ve caused.”

The complaint is an essential legal test as more states consider holding fossil fuels liable for expensive global warming-intensified events like floods, fires, and more. Maryland and Massachusetts are among the states expected to pursue similar legislation, modeled after the federal law known as Superfund, in 2025.

New York Gov. Kathy Hochul (D) signed a similar climate bill into law – the Climate Change Superfund Act- on Dec. 26, pointing to the need to fund climate adaptation projects.

Downtown Montpelier, Vermont was under water on Monday, July 10, 2023 caused by the flooding of the Winooski River.
(Photo: John Tully for The Washington Post via Getty Images)

Advertisement

Heavy Rains Cause Catastrophic Flooding In Southern Vermont
(Photo by Scott Eisen/Getty Images)

Flooding is seen in downtown Montpelier, Vermont
(Photo: John Tully for The Washington Post via Getty Images)



Source link

Continue Reading

Vermont

Man Shot Near Central and Vermont: Police and Rescue Respond – ABQ RAW

Published

on

Man Shot Near Central and Vermont: Police and Rescue Respond – ABQ RAW


Albuquerque –

Just after 5:25 PM, a shot rang out in near Central and Vermont. A person reported being shot in the 8310 block of Central Ave NE. Officers from the Albuquerque Police Department were dispatched, but fortunately, the New Mexico State Police happened to be in the vicinity and arrived promptly. Officers promptly rendered life saving measures, while Albuquerque Fire Rescue dispatched a rescue unit from Station 5 to the scene.

The man, who was shot in the leg, will be transported to a local area hospital by AFR. Presently, their condition is not known, but if we learn more, we will update you.

APD’s gun violence reduction unit (GVRU) is being called out to investigate this shooting.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Vermont

U.S. Chamber, Oil Industry Sue Vermont Over Law Requiring Companies To Pay For Climate Change Damage

Published

on

U.S. Chamber, Oil Industry Sue Vermont Over Law Requiring Companies To Pay For Climate Change Damage


MONTPELIER, Vt. (AP) — The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and a top oil and gas industry trade group are suing Vermont over its new law requiring that fossil fuel companies pay a share of the damage caused over several decades by climate change.

The federal lawsuit filed Monday asks a state court to prevent Vermont from enforcing the law, which was passed last year. Vermont became the first state in the country to enact the law after it suffered catastrophic summer flooding and damage from other extreme weather. The state is working to estimate the cost of climate change dating back to Jan. 1, 1995.

The lawsuit argues the U.S. Constitution precludes the act and that the state law is preempted by the federal Clean Air Act. It also argues that the law violates domestic and foreign commerce clauses by discriminating “against the important interest of other states by targeting large energy companies located outside of Vermont.”

The Chamber and the other plaintiff in the lawsuit, the American Petroleum Institute, argue that the federal government is already addressing climate change. And because greenhouse gases come from billions of individual sources, they argue it is impossible to measure “accurately and fairly” the impact of emissions from a particular entity in a particular location over decades.

Advertisement

“Vermont wants to impose massive retroactive penalties going back 30 years for lawful, out-of-state conduct that was regulated by Congress under the Clean Air Act,” said Tara Morrissey, senior vice president and deputy chief counsel of the Chamber’s litigation center. “That is unlawful and violates the structure of the U.S. Constitution — one state can’t try to regulate a global issue best left to the federal government. Vermont’s penalties will ultimately raise costs for consumers in Vermont and across the country.”

A spokesman for the state’s Agency of Natural Resources said it had not been formally served with this lawsuit.

Anthony Iarrapino, a Vermont-based lobbyist with the Conservation Law Foundation, said the lawsuit was the fossil fuel industry’s way of “trying to avoid accountability for the damage their products have caused in Vermont and beyond.”

“More states are following Vermont’s lead holding Big Oil accountable for the disaster recovery and cleanup costs from severe storms fueled by climate change, ensuring that families and businesses no longer have to foot the entire bill time and time again,” Iarrapino added.

Under the law, the Vermont state treasurer, in consultation with the Agency of Natural Resources, is to issue a report by Jan. 15, 2026, on the total cost to Vermonters and the state from the emission of greenhouse gases from Jan. 1, 1995, to Dec. 31, 2024. The assessment would look at the effects on public health, natural resources, agriculture, economic development, housing and other areas. The state would use federal data to determine the amount of covered greenhouse gas emissions attributed to a fossil fuel company.

Advertisement

It’s a polluter-pays model affecting companies engaged in the trade or business of extracting fossil fuel or refining crude oil attributable to more than 1 billion metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions during the time period. The funds could be used by the state for such things as improving stormwater drainage systems; upgrading roads, bridges and railroads; relocating, elevating or retrofitting sewage treatment plants; and making energy efficient weatherization upgrades to public and private buildings. It’s modeled after the federal Superfund pollution cleanup program.

We Need Your Support

Other news outlets have retreated behind paywalls. At HuffPost, we believe journalism should be free for everyone.

Would you help us provide essential information to our readers during this critical time? We can’t do it without you.

You’ve supported HuffPost before, and we’ll be honest — we could use your help again. We view our mission to provide free, fair news as critically important in this crucial moment, and we can’t do it without you.

Advertisement

Whether you give once or many more times, we appreciate your contribution to keeping our journalism free for all.

You’ve supported HuffPost before, and we’ll be honest — we could use your help again. We view our mission to provide free, fair news as critically important in this crucial moment, and we can’t do it without you.

Whether you give just one more time or sign up again to contribute regularly, we appreciate you playing a part in keeping our journalism free for all.

Support HuffPost

Advertisement

The approach taken by Vermont has drawn interest from other states, including New York, where Gov. Kathy Hochul signed into law a similar bill in December.

The New York law requires companies responsible for substantial greenhouse gas emissions to pay into a state fund for infrastructure projects meant to repair or avoid future damage from climate change. The biggest emitters of greenhouse gases between 2000 and 2018 would be subjected to the fines.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending