Connect with us

Vermont

Towns responding in different ways to relentless spread of emerald ash borer

Published

on

Towns responding in different ways to relentless spread of emerald ash borer


SHAFTSBURY — The Shaftsbury Select Board is planning to hold a forum on the emerald ash borer (EAB) in the spring.

Board Chair Naomi Miller brought up the idea at the board’s Aug. 5 meeting.

“What I was envisioning when I suggested that we do this was that we perhaps have some experts come and talk about what towns are doing, not individual citizens, but towns are doing with this enormous impending monstrosity of a dilemma that that’s potentially going to be economically beyond our imagining,” she said.

Advertisement

The intent was to “get people to begin to think about it out loud together as a community. Not so much that we have experts come in and teach us about the ash borer, etc, but that we have people who are expert in thinking about what towns can do and how,” Miller said. “What are the various possibilities for long term management to this so that we’re just thinking about it ahead of time before it comes crashing down on us, literally and figuratively.”

Board Vice Chair Martha Cornwell suggested having it recorded and posted by one of the local public access cable channels. 

“It seems like towns have very wide variety of the ways that they’re going about it, from it’s just a personal landowner’s responsibility all the way up to very expensive kind of tree infusions, for lack of a better word for it,” she said.

“Maybe we want to do it with a couple of other towns,” Miller said. “Wait till the spring, give ourselves time to organize it.”

“Originally from Asia, the emerald ash borer was first discovered in the Detroit area in 2002. It is believed to have entered the country on wooden packing materials,” according to the Vermont Agency of Agriculture Food and Markets. “This beetle feeds on all species of ash trees. Infested trees die within three to five years. As a non-native insect, EAB lacks natural predators to keep it in check. EAB was initially detected in the state in 2018 and has spread and established itself in most of Vermont.”

Advertisement

The insect is responsible for the death and decline of tens of millions of ash trees in North America. The beetle is bright, metallic green, measures about one-half inch long and has a flattened back. Trees infested with EAB may show signs and symptoms including bark splitting and D-shaped exit holes on the bark surface

According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, “EAB is difficult to detect early when pest populations are small because damage to the trees is hidden under the bark and tree decline is gradual. The beetle is well-suited to our climate, is a good flyer, and spreads naturally. People contribute to the long-distance spread of the beetle when they move EAB-infested ash firewood, logs or nursery stock.”

During a recent visit to a forest site in North Pownal, new Bennington County Forester Tessa McGann, gave an overview of the problem and the response to it.

“It is slowly spreading. We make these maps that show, what’s the 10 mile radius and 20 mile radius for danger zones, and it’s definitely becoming [widespread throughout] the entire state, and in this corner of Vermont,” she said. “And it’s definitely active in Bennington County. And in the coming years, we can definitely expect it will be all over Vermont. We will see ash trees die all over Vermont. That is unavoidable.”

There are several different species of ash trees in Vermont. There are white and black ash, which is also called brown ash, and also green ash. “And we are seeing there’s different levels of resistance to the disease. It’s very, very, very little resistance, but still with white ash, we see a little bit more,” she said.

Advertisement

For that reason, in places where the trees do not pose a safety hazard or where the landowner does not need to cut down the tree to sell before it dies, the recommendation is to leave ash trees standing as much as possible.

“We do have a hope that there will be some amount that are resistant to the beetle, and if they survive, they can help repopulate the forest,” McGann said. “A big mistake we made with chestnut trees 100 years ago is that we cut them all down, and then every once in a while we found one that was resistant, but we didn’t leave enough out there to naturally repopulate. So we’re really trying to avoid that.”

Vermont Has the Largest Percentage of Residents Working Past Retirement Age

Advertisement

People can use insecticide on select ash trees, but this is expensive and only lasts a couple of years, she said.

The state has begun releasing wasps that are the natural predator to the EAB in hopes of eventually creating a natural balance once the EAB population runs out of food and its population crashes, she said.

“We need ash trees to be on the landscape for that point to be a part of that balance. So right now, people are doing treatments to try to regenerate ash, to encourage seedlings to get established and start growing, because when they’re really, really young, the beetle is not going to kill them,” McGann said. “It’s not going to waste its time on them. So, there’s hope, I guess is what I’m saying.”

The Vermont Department of Forests, Parks & Recreation offers an online Vermont Forest Invasive Pest Status Map. It tracks the presence (by town) of several invasive species, including the EAB on a town-by-town basis. It shows a prevalence of towns with the invasive in the northwest part of the state and in the south. In fact, every town along the Massachusetts border, from Pownal in the west to Vernon in the east has an infestation.

According to the map, Shaftsbury and Bennington have had an infestation since 2020, Stamford since 2018, Rupert since 2021, Pownal since 2022. Manchester and Dorset first reported infestations this year. The map shows no infestation in Arlington, but this does not correspond to observations on the ground.

Advertisement

In response to questions for this article, Arlington Town Manager Nick Zaiac said that “Arlington does indeed have a spreading infestation, and there is evidence of ash borer townwide, but mostly in the central and eastern areas so far. The first documented evidence came from the southeast corner of town. It is not limited to any particular type of landowner.”

The town’s Select Board has discussed ash trees at the town rec park but the issue there isn’t particularly bad, he said.

“We have one small grant for cutting ash trees in the Buck Hill Road area which will take place next spring,” Zaiac said. “The state has reported that there will not be substantial funding for ash removal into the future, so we save a few thousand every year in a Hazardous Tree Fund to be prepared for when they start to die in substantial numbers.

“Ash borer takes a few years to kill trees, so we haven’t seen reports that it alone has killed anything so far,” he said “Ash in the area are also dealing with a fungal ‘ash blight’ that weakens the trees separately. Our plan is to watch the trees and have them cut as they endanger the traveling public.”

Bennington officials are aware of the issue. With the help of Town Communications Director Jonah Spivak, two responded by email.

Advertisement

Director of Buildings and Grounds Paul Dansereau replied that his department is not involved in any ash borer mitigation actions other than in following State of Vermont published guidelines.

RJ Joly, Director of Department of Public Works, said he attended the first class on this topic about seven years ago. “We really somehow have not had a problem as the Town.”

“We have a few in the right of way but they are over power lines, and we can’t remove them if we wanted to,” he said.

When wood lots were logged, the department tried to harvest mature ash trees before the bug killed them, he added.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Vermont

VT Lottery Gimme 5, Pick 3 results for July 16, 2026

Published

on


Powerball, Mega Millions jackpots: What to know in case you win

Here’s what to know in case you win the Powerball or Mega Millions jackpot.

Just the FAQs, USA TODAY

The Vermont Lottery offers several draw games for those willing to make a bet to win big.

Advertisement

Those who want to play can enter the MegaBucks and Lucky for Life games as well as the national Powerball and Mega Millions games. Vermont also partners with New Hampshire and Maine for the Tri-State Lottery, which includes the Mega Bucks, Gimme 5 as well as the Pick 3 and Pick 4.

Drawings are held at regular days and times, check the end of this story to see the schedule.

Here’s a look at July 16, 2026, results for each game:

Winning Gimme 5 numbers from July 16 drawing

08-10-35-36-37

Check Gimme 5 payouts and previous drawings here.

Advertisement

Winning Pick 3 numbers from July 16 drawing

Day: 4-3-2

Evening: 3-4-4

Check Pick 3 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Pick 4 numbers from July 16 drawing

Day: 5-7-1-5

Evening: 6-6-9-0

Advertisement

Check Pick 4 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Millionaire for Life numbers from July 16 drawing

09-21-29-52-57, Bonus: 05

Check Millionaire for Life payouts and previous drawings here.

Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results

Are you a winner? Here’s how to claim your lottery prize

For Vermont Lottery prizes up to $499, winners can claim their prize at any authorized Vermont Lottery retailer or at the Vermont Lottery Headquarters by presenting the signed winning ticket for validation. Prizes between $500 and $5,000 can be claimed at any M&T Bank location in Vermont during the Vermont Lottery Office’s business hours, which are 8a.m.-4p.m. Monday through Friday, except state holidays.

Advertisement

For prizes over $5,000, claims must be made in person at the Vermont Lottery headquarters. In addition to signing your ticket, you will need to bring a government-issued photo ID, and a completed claim form.

All prize claims must be submitted within one year of the drawing date. For more information on prize claims or to download a Vermont Lottery Claim Form, visit the Vermont Lottery’s FAQ page or contact their customer service line at (802) 479-5686.

Vermont Lottery Headquarters

1311 US Route 302, Suite 100

Barre, VT

Advertisement

05641

When are the Vermont Lottery drawings held?

  • Powerball: 10:59 p.m. Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday.
  • Mega Millions: 11 p.m. Tuesday and Friday.
  • Gimme 5: 6:55 p.m. Monday through Friday.
  • Lucky for Life: 10:38 p.m. daily.
  • Pick 3 Day: 1:10 p.m. daily.
  • Pick 4 Day: 1:10 p.m. daily.
  • Pick 3 Evening: 6:55 p.m. daily.
  • Pick 4 Evening: 6:55 p.m. daily.
  • Megabucks: 7:59 p.m. Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.
  • Millionaire for Life: 11:15 p.m. daily

What is Vermont Lottery Second Chance?

Vermont’s 2nd Chance lottery lets players enter eligible non-winning instant scratch tickets into a drawing to win cash and/or other prizes. Players must register through the state’s official Lottery website or app. The drawings are held quarterly or are part of an additional promotion, and are done at Pollard Banknote Limited in Winnipeg, MB, Canada.

This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a Vermont editor. You can send feedback using this form.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Vermont

A Vermont couple builds an 800-square-foot home on a budget – The Boston Globe

Published

on

A Vermont couple builds an 800-square-foot home on a budget – The Boston Globe


Sam Gabriels and Chrissy Bellmeyer were no strangers to living small. Before they met, Bellmeyer designed and lived in a tiny house on wheels and Gabriels spent four years living out of a van, looping the country to organize pop-up farm-to-table dinners alongside Michelin-starred chefs. So, when the couple bought a half-acre lot in Waitsfield, Vermont’s Mad River Valley in a development called the Waitsfield Ten, where neighbors help each other build, 800 square feet didn’t feel like a constraint.

Architectural designer and builder Andy White of Boreal Design started by creating a simple, 20-by-20-foot box that was drywalled, then painted, in a weekend. Inside it, White built the living spaces as independent, self-supporting platforms arranged at staggered heights. He describes the plan as a counter-clockwise spiral: Down one step from the entry into the living room, up two into the kitchen, up one more into the dining room.

The level variations define each space. “If built traditionally with two floor plates and 9-foot ceilings, the house would feel claustrophobic,” White says. “Here, you experience the full interior volume, with long sightlines from corner to corner.”

Without walls dividing the public spaces, rooms morph to fit current needs and individual elements do double or triple duty. For example, the open cubbies that store Gabriels’s vinyl collection are also perches for overflow dinner party guests in the dining room and extra seating in the living room. Initially, White worried — unnecessarily — that the living room was too small and lacked a wall for a television. The couple got a projector and screen, and noted that the deck expands the experience. The mechanicals and storage are under the floors.

Advertisement
The window arrangement of this sustainable home in Waitsfield, Vermont, takes advantage of passive solar heating and cooling.Ryan Bent

Upstairs, the 8-by-12-foot space in front of the primary bedroom is both a closet/dressing area and mini lounge. In the morning, guests might wander over from the second bedroom to chat; during parties, it’s another spot to hang out. “We’re very open people, so it works for us,” Gabriels says. If things change, the couple could add standard-size French doors to hide their bed. The second bedroom, which already has a pocket door for privacy, could absorb the office nook beside it to become a larger bedroom.

The materials palette celebrates what’s commonly available: nothing is precious, everything is considered. Walls and ceilings throughout are CDX fir plywood — construction-grade sheathing that is normally hidden behind drywall. Structural fir posts, usually buried, are left exposed. The couple planed, sanded, and stained the posts and sanded all the plywood, removing lumberyard stamps. In place of galvanized joist hangers, White used inexpensive angle steel, spray-painted black. Running the length of the staircase and bracketing the bedroom thresholds, it’s the home’s signature accent. It matches the exterior siding — corrugated metal that is distinctive, inexpensive, easy to install, and low-maintenance.

The bedrooms, each in their own wood box, illustrate how architect Andy White conceived of the interior spaces on a grid.Ryan Bent

Sustainability was non-negotiable. Fourteen-inch-thick, cellulose-filled walls push the dwelling past passive-house standards for insulation and airtightness. They also leave deep window sills that double as seating, plant shelves, and such. The utility bill for the all-electric home averages just over $100 per month (excluding internet).

Decor-wise, color does the talking. The bright yellow kitchen and pink-tiled bath are odes to homes that Gabriels admired in New Mexico, Oregon, and California. “We took a Pacifico beer bottle cap to Home Depot to find the right canary yellow for the kitchen cabinets,” Bellmeyer says.

The built-in daybed under the stairs increases seating in the 101-square-foot living room, as do the storage cubbies and low wall that separate it from the dining room.Ryan Bent

White says his construction methods make it easy to add onto the home, although the couple has no plans to do so. Rather, they hope to build an ADU to offer housing to others in the community. “This is a mid-income development, making it cheaper than the median house price but not attainable for everyone,” Bellmeyer says.

Meanwhile, they’re grateful for White’s unconventional approach, fulfilling their wish list within the square footage their budget allowed.

White deflects the praise back onto the couple. “The home wouldn’t have come together the way that it did for anyone else; it’s very much theirs,” he says. “Chrissy and Sam’s vision, willingness to take risks and reimagine typical rooms, informed the design more than any specific space-saving or building strategy.”

Advertisement

Architectural designer and builder: Boreal Design, borealdesignvt.com

Cabinetmaker: Han Hewn, hanhewn.com

Walking in the front door, you can see the entire first floor of this 800-square- foot Vermont home.Ryan Bent

Marni Elyse Katz is a contributing editor to the Globe Magazine. Follow her on Instagram @StyleCarrot. Send comments to magazine@globe.com.





Source link

Continue Reading

Vermont

Ben & Jerry’s Foundation says it will shut down amid legal dispute with parent company – VTDigger

Published

on

Ben & Jerry’s Foundation says it will shut down amid legal dispute with parent company – VTDigger


Two patrons enter the Ben & Jerry’s Ice Cream shop on Church Street in Burlington. File photo by Charles Krupa/AP

The Ben & Jerry’s Foundation says it will shut down at the end of the year after its corporate parent cut off funding and evicted its three staffers Wednesday. The move leaves $600,000 a year in grants to Vermont organizations, and 40 years of the ice cream brand’s progressive mission, hanging on a judge’s future ruling.

“This is the other foot dropping in terms of the way Magnum is trying to destroy the social values of Ben & Jerry’s,” said Ben Cohen, co-founder of Ben & Jerry’s Homemade, in an interview Wednesday.

The Vermont-based iconic ice cream brand has been in a legal fight with its parent company, The Magnum Ice Cream Co. — an ice-cream spinoff of the larger corporation Unilever — since November 2024. Ben & Jerry’s alleges that the corporation overreached its control, pushing out the CEO and interfering with the brand’s political views. The question before a judge is whether the corporate parent had the authority to reshape governance and withhold funding from the foundation. 

Amid the push-and-pull over governance, Unilever audited the foundation, which is the philanthropic arm of Ben & Jerry’s, in April 2025, finding conflicts of interest and a lack of governance and financial control. 

Advertisement

Liz Bankowski, president of the foundation’s board of trustees, said in an interview that Unilever withheld the philanthropy’s funding late last year and ordered foundation staff to vacate its corporate office in South Burlington by July 15 because of governance issues the audit raised. This led the foundation’s leaders to join the ongoing lawsuit, fought by the ice cream brand’s independent board, in an effort to retain funding. The lawsuit is pending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. 

While the foundation’s leadership is framing the decision to cease operations as the only option after Unilever withheld funding, an unnamed spokesperson for Magnum wrote in a statement to VTDigger that the shuttering is “entirely down to the Trustees and their decision to ignore the findings of an independent audit and failure to put in place basic good governance; much to our dismay.” 

Since the audit, the foundation has adopted a conflict of interest policy, but “the bottom line was that unless we changed our board, they were going to continue to withhold funding,” Bankowski said.  

Cohen described the audit as “a bunch of trumped-up charges.” 

“The foundation has been independently audited every year,” he said. “I think that Magnum was searching in vain for some illegal or unethical activities. I think they found none.” 

Advertisement

Since Ben & Jerry’s sold the ice cream business to Unilever in 2000, the corporation has given $60 million to the foundation. The philanthropic arm has operated for 40 years, supporting the ice cream brand’s progressive mission by offering financial backing to social justice organizations across the country. The foundation does not have an endowment and is reliant on the funding its parent company gives annually, outlined in its merger contract.

A chunk of that funding, $600,000 a year, goes to Vermont organizations such as the immigrant farmworker rights organization Migrant Justice and the LGBTQ+ nonprofit Outright Vermont, according to foundation leaders. 

“We fill a particular niche that not a lot of other funders fill,” said Rebecca Golden, the foundation’s director of programs, who has worked at the organization for 34 years. 

Golden is one of three foundation staffers whose last day in the physical office is Wednesday, following orders from Magnum to vacate. Although Magnum did not directly address its vacate order in its statement to VTDigger, the spokesperson wrote that the foundation’s leaders recently “took the position that its staff are not Ben & Jerry’s employees, despite utilising Ben & Jerry’s offices and systems.”

Golden described the possible shutdown as an “enormous loss” that will not only affect the organizations that the foundation supports but also Ben & Jerry’s employees who “feel very proud of being a part of the foundation.” 

Advertisement

“It’s been a really long year, so there’s been a lot of emotions — the whole gamut, as we like to say of the seven stages of grief. But I think at this point we’re sort of in the acceptance phase,” she said. 

The Magnum spokesperson indicated that the work of the foundation will continue even if its leaders decide to cease operations at the end of the year, writing that the company is “firmly committed to funding a grant-giving foundation, supported by appropriate governance controls to ensure it is living by its values.”

But Cohen is not confident that Magnum will uphold the values of the Ben & Jerry’s Foundation in the corporation’s continued philanthropic efforts. 

“What are they going to fund? I have no idea. My guess is that they would not be looking to fund entities that are opposed to the status quo,” Cohen said.

The foundation’s leaders have pointed to its support of Migrant Justice during a period when the farmworker organization was considering a boycott of Ben & Jerry’s as an example of their commitment to social justice. After immigrant farmworkers raised concerns about working conditions at farms supplying Ben & Jerry’s, the company joined a program that collaborates with farmworkers to strive for fair working conditions. 

Advertisement

Political activism has been central to the Ben & Jerry’s brand since its founding. As a part of the ongoing lawsuit, Ben & Jerry’s alleged in a May filing that Magnum has been undercutting its social justice mission in order to “censor, intimidate and purge” the company’s independent board, which Cohen said was created to defend its progressive values. 

Three of the board’s members, including one who has been an outspoken critic of Israel, were removed late last year after the parent corporation introduced a new set of governance practices. In its motion to dismiss the lawsuit, Magnum argues that it retains ultimate authority and the brand’s social mission must be nonpartisan.  

As the lawsuit awaits a decision, Cohen, who is not a part of the suit, has created a campaign to “free Ben & Jerry’s,” amassing around 160,000 signers for its petition demanding that Magnum sell Ben & Jerry’s to a “group of values-aligned investors.”   

“The very values-led business model that built Ben & Jerry’s into this amazing, phenomenal brand is the very thing that Magnum is currently destroying,” Cohen said.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending