Connect with us

Vermont

Sarah Reeves: Let’s bring Vermont’s recycling into the 21st century

Published

on

Sarah Reeves: Let’s bring Vermont’s recycling into the 21st century


This commentary is by Sarah Reeves, government director of the Chittenden Stable Waste District.

Almost 30 years in the past, the Chittenden Stable Waste District constructed Vermont’s first recycling sorting facility, often called a supplies restoration facility, the place “blue-bin” recyclables are sorted. On this identical yr — 1993 — “Jurassic Park” was the massive film hit, a gallon of fuel price $1.68, and Janet Jackson and Mariah Carey dominated the music charts. In different phrases, it was a very long time in the past. 

And identical to folks’s style in music has modified, folks’s recycling wants have developed. The present supplies restoration facility can not sustain with trendy packaging and the recycling wants of Vermonters right now. The ability is inefficient and outdated. Workers are nonetheless hand-sorting some supplies, and the ability is at capability.

To deal with these challenges, Chittenden Stable Waste District is proposing to construct a brand new supplies restoration facility that can be extra environment friendly and efficient, offering reasonably priced, in-state processing for Vermonters’ recycling for years to come back. It will likely be constructed with sufficient capability and suppleness to adapt to modifications in quantity and kinds of recyclables over the subsequent 30 years. The brand new supplies restoration facility can be higher geared up to cope with the vastly diversified packaging codecs that didn’t exist within the twentieth century.

Advertisement

Chittenden Stable Waste District features very like a college or water district, solely we handle stable waste. As a municipally owned district, we serve the general public with out revenue as a driver. 

As a result of we’re a municipality, we want voter approval for long-term borrowing in order that we are able to finance the brand new supplies restoration facility challenge. Chittenden Stable Waste District can be looking for voter approval on this yr’s basic election to borrow not more than $22 million to construct the brand new supplies restoration facility.

In 1993, it’s uncertain that anybody may have imagined the number of packaging that exists in our trendy world. As a result of packaging has modified considerably since then, we’re not in a position to course of the entire kinds of packaging that we want to. The brand new supplies restoration facility, nevertheless, will enable Chittenden Stable Waste District to have the pliability to adapt to future packaging improvements. And the place markets can be found, we can even have the ability to add issues like packaging and containers constructed from black plastic to our checklist of recyclable gadgets.

The brand new supplies restoration facility will enable us to develop for the subsequent 30 years, with 40% extra capability. Vermonters know that recycling has immense advantages for the atmosphere, the local weather, and the economic system. Chittenden Stable Waste District’s new supplies restoration facility will have the ability to course of as much as 70,000 tons (140 million kilos) of recyclables yearly. Recycling these supplies has important greenhouse fuel discount advantages, the equal of eradicating 52,500 passenger automobiles from the street and conserving almost 28 million gallons of fuel yearly. Recycling these supplies saves 634,000 bushes from being reduce down, yearly!  

Recycling reduces the quantity of waste despatched to landfills, conserves pure assets, reduces carbon emissions and creates jobs within the recycling and manufacturing industries. For all of those causes, Vermonters wish to recycle, they usually wish to recycle extra. Constructing a brand new supplies restoration facility will enable our state to recycle extra quantity and kinds of packaging, which implies eradicating extra supplies from the waste stream and sending much less trash to Vermont’s one and solely landfill.

Advertisement

The advantages of a brand new supplies restoration facility transcend defending the atmosphere and lengthen to our economic system. The brand new supplies restoration facility will exchange repetitive, hand-sorting jobs with extra various, expert jobs. It is going to additionally present our hard-working workforce members with a cleaner facility and improved working circumstances.

Whereas the brand new supplies restoration facility is an thrilling prospect, what is probably much more interesting is the truth that this new high-tech facility can be constructed without charge to taxpayers. This bond is not going to enhance taxes and Chittenden Stable Waste District can pay again the mortgage over 25 to 30 years via our operational income. 

Chittenden Stable Waste District does our greatest with what we’ve got, however the present facility has us caught up to now. It’s excessive time we moved into the twenty first century and helped the subsequent two generations of Vermonters recycle extra. The advantages of a brand new supplies restoration facility are clear. It’s a win for Vermonters, our surroundings, and our economic system. I hope you’ll be part of Chittenden Stable Waste District in realizing our imaginative and prescient by supporting the brand new supplies restoration facility and voting for the bond within the November basic election.

Do you know VTDigger is a nonprofit?

Our journalism is made potential by member donations. In case you worth what we do, please contribute and assist maintain this important useful resource accessible to all.

Advertisement
Filed beneath:

Commentary

Tags: $22 million, Chittenden Stable Waste District, supplies restoration facility, Sarah Reeves, voter approval

Commentary

About Commentaries

VTDigger.org publishes 12 to 18 commentaries every week from a broad vary of group sources. All commentaries should embrace the creator’s first and final identify, city of residence and a quick biography, together with affiliations with political events, lobbying or particular curiosity teams. Authors are restricted to at least one commentary printed per thirty days from February via Could; the remainder of the yr, the restrict is 2 per thirty days, area allowing. The minimal size is 400 phrases, and the utmost is 850 phrases. We require commenters to quote sources for quotations and on a case-by-case foundation we ask writers to again up assertions. We don’t have the assets to truth examine commentaries and reserve the best to reject opinions for issues of style and inaccuracy. We don’t publish commentaries which can be endorsements of political candidates. Commentaries are voices from the group and don’t symbolize VTDigger in any manner. Please ship your commentary to Tom Kearney, [email protected]

Electronic mail: [email protected]

Ship us your ideas

VTDigger is now accepting letters to the editor. For details about our tips, and entry to the letter kind, please
click on right here.

Advertisement

 

Current Tales






Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Vermont

Scott’s plan to cut school spending worries some educators

Published

on

Scott’s plan to cut school spending worries some educators


MONTPELIER, Vt. (WCAX) – Vermont educators are leery of plans from Gov. Phil Scott to control costs in Vermont’s education system. In Thursday’s inaugural address, Scott pitched sweeping plans to rein in spending which has led to skyrocketing property tax rates.

Last year, one-third of Vemont’s school budgets failed and voters sent more Republicans to Montpelier in years in what some dubbed a tax revolt.

Democrats say everything should be on the table to fix the tax troubles, but some in the education community remain wary.

In his address, the governor outlined a multiyear plan to overhaul how we fund public schools and rein in the cost of spending which has skyrocketed to $2.3 billion.

Advertisement

“In too many districts, teachers aren’t paid enough, administrators are tied up in bureaucracy, schools have too much empty space and many are in disrepair,” said Scott, R-Vermont.

He proposes consolidating dozens of school districts and supervisory unions, putting guardrails on local school spending and completely rewriting the school funding formula with the aim of cutting back on staff and the 80% of school costs that go to wages and benefits.

But some in Vermont’s education community see it another way.

“We have to be clear what is the problem we’re trying to solve. We’re not spending too much money in public education; we’re having a difficult time funding it,” said Don Tinney the executive director of the Vermont NEA.

The Vermont teachers union contends the state has enough taxing capacity to fund schools and students’ complex needs. But they say the state should instead fund schools through state and income tax instead of a property tax.

Advertisement

“We believe the income tax is the fairest way of doing that because people are paying what they can afford to pay,” Tinney said.

As for the funding formula, Scott argues more affluent towns that can afford higher property taxes spend more and approve their local budgets, which drives up costs in the statewide education fund.

“Those higher spenders can actually increase the rates of those districts whose kids and teachers are getting less,” Scott said.

The governor is expected to introduce a formula where districts are paid a flat rate and any additional spending would have to be raised locally.

But some worry that will lead to inequitable opportunities for kids.

Advertisement

“There are states that use foundation formulas to keep poor people poor and drive down public education costs and allow for more opportunities for private schools and school choice schemes. I can’t see Vermont allowing that to happen,” said Jay Nichols of the Vermont Principals’ Association.

Vermonters are still staring down a 6% property tax increase if school budgets as drafted pass on Town Meeting Day.

Scott says in the weeks ahead, he will unveil ideas to hold taxpayers harmless and keep taxes flat.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Vermont

Vermont expected to get light snow Saturday. Here’s the forecast

Published

on

Vermont expected to get light snow Saturday. Here’s the forecast


Wintry weather spreads across the South

Significant snow and icy precipitation are moving from Texas to the Carolinas.

Following a week of cold temperatures and harsh winds, this weekend will see light snow across New England, including Vermont.

While the snow is expected to cover the entire state of Vermont, this weekend’s snowfall will be calm, with no strong winds to create a storm and only a small amount of accumulation.

Advertisement

Here’s what to know about the timing, location and effects of Saturday’s snowfall in Vermont.

Where in VT will it snow Saturday?

According to the National Weather Service (NWS) of Burlington, light snow is expected throughout the day on Saturday, with the greatest chances of snow in the morning. Most areas of the state will see one inch of snowfall, with two inches possible in the middle region of the state.

While Vermont has seen extremely strong winds over this past week, the wind is expected to die down Friday night and stay mild throughout the snow Saturday. As of right now, the NWS has not issued any hazards or warning for Saturday, as the snowfall is expected to be calm.

Advertisement

VT weather next week

Temperatures will stay in the 20s throughout the weekend, with slightly warmer temperatures coming in next week. Snow showers are expected overnight from Monday to Tuesday.



Source link

Continue Reading

Vermont

Committee leadership in the Vermont Senate sees major overhaul – VTDigger

Published

on

Committee leadership in the Vermont Senate sees major overhaul – VTDigger


Sen. Chris Mattos, R-Chittenden North, center, speaks with Sen. Andrew Perchlik, D/P-Washington, at the Statehouse in Montpelier on Thursday, Jan. 9. Photo by Glenn Russell/VTDigger

Nine of the Vermont Senate’s 11 standing committees will have new leaders this biennium and three will be helmed by Republicans, Lt. Gov. John Rodgers announced from the Senate floor Thursday afternoon.

The committee overhaul follows the retirement, death or defeat of a considerable number of veteran chairs last year — and after Republicans picked up six seats in the 30-member body in November’s election. Democrats and Progressives now hold 17 seats, while Republicans control 13.

Unlike the Vermont House, where committee positions are chosen unilaterally by the speaker, Senate assignments are doled out by a three-member panel, the Committee on Committees, which this year includes two new participants: Rodgers, a Republican, and Sen. Ginny Lyons, D-Chittenden Southeast. Senate President Pro Tempore Phil Baruth, D/P-Chittenden Central, returned to the committee. 

The trio had few experienced senators from which to choose, given that — as Baruth noted in his opening remarks to the chamber Wednesday — nearly two-thirds of the Senate’s members joined the body over the past two years. Illustrating the point, newly sworn-in Sen. Seth Bongartz, D-Bennington, was tapped to chair the Senate Education Committee. (Bongartz had previously served in the House since 2021 — and had tours of duty in both the House and Senate in the 1980s.)

Advertisement

Perhaps the most significant appointment went to Sen. Andrew Perchlik, D/P-Washington, who will chair the powerful Senate Appropriations Committee. He succeeds Sen. Jane Kitchel, D-Caledonia, who retired after leading the budget-writing panel for 14 years.  

Sen. Nader Hashim, D-Windham, will helm the Senate Judiciary Committee, following the death last June of veteran Sen. Dick Sears, D-Bennington. 

The Senate Natural Resources & Energy Committee will be led by Sen. Anne Watson, D/P-Washington. Its former chair, Sen. Chris Bray, D-Addison, was defeated in November. 

Republicans flip six seats in the Vermont Senate, shattering Democratic supermajority


Advertisement

Sen. Alison Clarkson, D-Windsor, takes over the Senate Economic Development, Housing & General Affairs Committee from Sen. Kesha Ram Hinsdale, D-Chittenden Southeast. Ram Hinsdale defeated Clarkson for the role of Senate majority leader in November, requiring the former to step down from her committee leadership position and allowing the latter to step up. 

The three Republicans chairing panels are Sen. Richard Westman, R-Lamoille, who will run the Senate Transportation Committee; Sen. Russ Ingalls, R-Essex, who will head the Senate Agriculture Committee; and Sen. Brian Collamore, R-Rutland, who will lead the Senate Government Operations Committee. (Republicans similarly made gains in House leadership positions this year.)

Sen. Wendy Harrison, D-Windham, takes over the Senate Institutions Committee from Ingalls, who chaired it last biennium. 

The sole returning chairs are Lyons, who will continue to lead the Senate Health & Welfare Committee, and Sen. Ann Cummings, D-Washington, who will retain control of the Senate Finance Committee. 

Advertisement

Speaking to reporters Thursday afternoon, Baruth said the Committee on Committees had intentionally sought partisan equilibrium on certain panels. The Senate Education Committee, for example, which is expected to engage in heavy lifting as lawmakers reconsider the state’s education funding scheme, includes three Democrats and three Republicans. For a bill to clear that panel, four members would have to approve.

“What I intended for that committee… to do is to put out bipartisan bills,” Baruth said of Senate Ed. 

Similarly, Baruth called the composition of the tax-writing Senate Finance Committee “very centrist,” with four Democrats and three Republicans. 

“They’re going to have a lot of work to do, hard work, but the one thing I want them to think — to think long and hard about — is any kind of raising taxes or fees,” Baruth said. “The only time I’m looking to do that, if it’s necessary, is if it brings down the property tax.”

Ethan Weinstein contributed reporting.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending