Connect with us

Vermont

Planned Parenthood to close four Vermont health centers next month

Published

on

Planned Parenthood to close four Vermont health centers next month


Deliberate Parenthood of Northern New England plans to shut 5 part-time well being facilities — 4 of that are in Vermont, and one other on the border in New Hampshire — and develop the hours of seven others, the group mentioned in a Friday afternoon press launch. 

The modifications are meant “to make sure the group is sustainable and capable of meet the wants of the area, sufferers, and workers long run,” Deliberate Parenthood mentioned within the announcement.

In whole, Deliberate Parenthood at present operates 11 well being facilities in Vermont. The 4 slated to shut June 12 are positioned in Bennington, Hyde Park, Middlebury and St. Albans. Amongst them, Bennington is the one location that at present presents abortion companies. 

Advertisement

The Deliberate Parenthood well being heart in Claremont, New Hampshire, can also be set to shut. The 4 remaining New Hampshire places are all positioned within the southern a part of the state.

All 4 of Deliberate Parenthood’s clinics in Maine are staying open.

The group mentioned the closures will enable it to develop the times of operation to a minimal of 4 or 5 days every week in any respect of its remaining well being facilities. These expansions will happen over the following yr.

The announcement comes as federally protected abortion entry is beneath risk. The U.S. Supreme Court docket seems poised to strike down the fitting to abortion, in keeping with a leaked draft of the bulk opinion.

If the court docket’s landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling had been overturned, abortion laws could be ruled by state legislation. The U.S. Senate didn’t codify Roe into legislation on Wednesday. Sens. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., and Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., supported the unsuccessful effort.

Advertisement

Beneath present state legislation, abortion would stay authorized in Vermont — and voters within the state are slated to weigh on this November on whether or not to enshrine abortion rights within the Vermont Structure. 

Lucy Leriche, vice chairman of public affairs at Deliberate Parenthood Vermont Motion Fund, advised VTDigger final week that Vermont’s clinics are anticipating an inflow of out-of-state sufferers who can’t entry abortions at residence.

After the Bennington location closes, 5 Deliberate Parenthood clinics within the state will proceed to carry out abortions.

Kai Williams, Deliberate Parenthood of Northern New England’s senior vice chairman of well being care supply, known as the closures a “tough however strategic choice” that might enable the group to “rise to the second that we’re in,” in keeping with the discharge.

Deliberate Parenthood mentioned it’s increasing the times of operation at its Barre, Brattleboro and Williston places. It’s additionally planning to develop the hours of the well being heart in Exeter, New Hampshire, in addition to three in Maine.

Advertisement

“Our sufferers and our long-term skill to offer care are on the heart of each choice we make,” Williams mentioned within the launch. “We imagine these selections will be certain that we will proceed to serve northern New England for generations to return.”

There are not any plans to alter hours on the places in Burlington, Rutland, St. Johnsbury and White River Junction.

Do not miss a factor. Join right here to get VTDigger’s weekly electronic mail on Vermont hospitals, well being care traits, insurance coverage and state well being care coverage.

Do you know VTDigger is a nonprofit?

Our journalism is made attainable by member donations. When you worth what we do, please contribute and assist hold this important useful resource accessible to all.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Vermont

Vermont Sued for New Law Requiring Big Oil to Pay for Climate Damage | Common Dreams

Published

on

Vermont Sued for New Law Requiring Big Oil to Pay for Climate Damage | Common Dreams


The US Chamber of Commerce and the American Petroleum Institute – representing the biggest fossil fuel companies in the world – are suing the State of Vermont over its new law requiring fossil fuel companies to pay a share of the state’s damage caused by climate change.

The lawsuit, filed last Monday in the US District Court for the District of Vermont, asks a state court to prevent Vermont from enforcing the law passed last year. Vermont became the first state in the country to enact the law after it suffered over $1 billion in damages from catastrophic summer flooding and other extreme weather.

Vermont’s Attorney General’s Office said as of Friday, Jan. 3, they had not been served with the lawsuit.

The lawsuit argues that the U.S. Constitution precludes the act and that the federal Clean Air Act preempts state law. It also claims that the law violates domestic and foreign commerce clauses by discriminating “against the important interest of other states by targeting large energy companies located outside of Vermont.”

Advertisement

The Chamber and the American Petroleum Institute argue that the federal government is already addressing climate change. Because greenhouse gases come from billions of individual sources, they claim it has been impossible to measure “accurately and fairly” the impact of emissions from a particular entity in a specific location over decades.

“For too long, giant fossil fuel companies have knowingly lit the match of climate disruption without being required to do a thing to put out the fire,” Paul Burns, executive director of the Vermont Public Interest Research Group, said in a statement. “Finally, maybe for the first time anywhere, Vermont is going to hold the companies most responsible for climate-driven floods, fires and heat waves financially accountable for a fair share of the damages they’ve caused.”

The complaint is an essential legal test as more states consider holding fossil fuels liable for expensive global warming-intensified events like floods, fires, and more. Maryland and Massachusetts are among the states expected to pursue similar legislation, modeled after the federal law known as Superfund, in 2025.

New York Gov. Kathy Hochul (D) signed a similar climate bill into law – the Climate Change Superfund Act- on Dec. 26, pointing to the need to fund climate adaptation projects.

Downtown Montpelier, Vermont was under water on Monday, July 10, 2023 caused by the flooding of the Winooski River.
(Photo: John Tully for The Washington Post via Getty Images)

Advertisement

Heavy Rains Cause Catastrophic Flooding In Southern Vermont
(Photo by Scott Eisen/Getty Images)

Flooding is seen in downtown Montpelier, Vermont
(Photo: John Tully for The Washington Post via Getty Images)



Source link

Continue Reading

Vermont

Man Shot Near Central and Vermont: Police and Rescue Respond – ABQ RAW

Published

on

Man Shot Near Central and Vermont: Police and Rescue Respond – ABQ RAW


Albuquerque –

Just after 5:25 PM, a shot rang out in near Central and Vermont. A person reported being shot in the 8310 block of Central Ave NE. Officers from the Albuquerque Police Department were dispatched, but fortunately, the New Mexico State Police happened to be in the vicinity and arrived promptly. Officers promptly rendered life saving measures, while Albuquerque Fire Rescue dispatched a rescue unit from Station 5 to the scene.

The man, who was shot in the leg, will be transported to a local area hospital by AFR. Presently, their condition is not known, but if we learn more, we will update you.

APD’s gun violence reduction unit (GVRU) is being called out to investigate this shooting.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Vermont

U.S. Chamber, Oil Industry Sue Vermont Over Law Requiring Companies To Pay For Climate Change Damage

Published

on

U.S. Chamber, Oil Industry Sue Vermont Over Law Requiring Companies To Pay For Climate Change Damage


MONTPELIER, Vt. (AP) — The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and a top oil and gas industry trade group are suing Vermont over its new law requiring that fossil fuel companies pay a share of the damage caused over several decades by climate change.

The federal lawsuit filed Monday asks a state court to prevent Vermont from enforcing the law, which was passed last year. Vermont became the first state in the country to enact the law after it suffered catastrophic summer flooding and damage from other extreme weather. The state is working to estimate the cost of climate change dating back to Jan. 1, 1995.

The lawsuit argues the U.S. Constitution precludes the act and that the state law is preempted by the federal Clean Air Act. It also argues that the law violates domestic and foreign commerce clauses by discriminating “against the important interest of other states by targeting large energy companies located outside of Vermont.”

The Chamber and the other plaintiff in the lawsuit, the American Petroleum Institute, argue that the federal government is already addressing climate change. And because greenhouse gases come from billions of individual sources, they argue it is impossible to measure “accurately and fairly” the impact of emissions from a particular entity in a particular location over decades.

Advertisement

“Vermont wants to impose massive retroactive penalties going back 30 years for lawful, out-of-state conduct that was regulated by Congress under the Clean Air Act,” said Tara Morrissey, senior vice president and deputy chief counsel of the Chamber’s litigation center. “That is unlawful and violates the structure of the U.S. Constitution — one state can’t try to regulate a global issue best left to the federal government. Vermont’s penalties will ultimately raise costs for consumers in Vermont and across the country.”

A spokesman for the state’s Agency of Natural Resources said it had not been formally served with this lawsuit.

Anthony Iarrapino, a Vermont-based lobbyist with the Conservation Law Foundation, said the lawsuit was the fossil fuel industry’s way of “trying to avoid accountability for the damage their products have caused in Vermont and beyond.”

“More states are following Vermont’s lead holding Big Oil accountable for the disaster recovery and cleanup costs from severe storms fueled by climate change, ensuring that families and businesses no longer have to foot the entire bill time and time again,” Iarrapino added.

Under the law, the Vermont state treasurer, in consultation with the Agency of Natural Resources, is to issue a report by Jan. 15, 2026, on the total cost to Vermonters and the state from the emission of greenhouse gases from Jan. 1, 1995, to Dec. 31, 2024. The assessment would look at the effects on public health, natural resources, agriculture, economic development, housing and other areas. The state would use federal data to determine the amount of covered greenhouse gas emissions attributed to a fossil fuel company.

Advertisement

It’s a polluter-pays model affecting companies engaged in the trade or business of extracting fossil fuel or refining crude oil attributable to more than 1 billion metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions during the time period. The funds could be used by the state for such things as improving stormwater drainage systems; upgrading roads, bridges and railroads; relocating, elevating or retrofitting sewage treatment plants; and making energy efficient weatherization upgrades to public and private buildings. It’s modeled after the federal Superfund pollution cleanup program.

We Need Your Support

Other news outlets have retreated behind paywalls. At HuffPost, we believe journalism should be free for everyone.

Would you help us provide essential information to our readers during this critical time? We can’t do it without you.

You’ve supported HuffPost before, and we’ll be honest — we could use your help again. We view our mission to provide free, fair news as critically important in this crucial moment, and we can’t do it without you.

Advertisement

Whether you give once or many more times, we appreciate your contribution to keeping our journalism free for all.

You’ve supported HuffPost before, and we’ll be honest — we could use your help again. We view our mission to provide free, fair news as critically important in this crucial moment, and we can’t do it without you.

Whether you give just one more time or sign up again to contribute regularly, we appreciate you playing a part in keeping our journalism free for all.

Support HuffPost

Advertisement

The approach taken by Vermont has drawn interest from other states, including New York, where Gov. Kathy Hochul signed into law a similar bill in December.

The New York law requires companies responsible for substantial greenhouse gas emissions to pay into a state fund for infrastructure projects meant to repair or avoid future damage from climate change. The biggest emitters of greenhouse gases between 2000 and 2018 would be subjected to the fines.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending