Connect with us

Vermont

Does Burlington have too many cannabis shops?

Published

on

Does Burlington have too many cannabis shops?


BURLINGTON, Vt. (WCAX) – After nearly two years with a regulated cannabis market, Vermont now has 81 licensed dispensaries statewide — 12 of them alone are located in Burlington, with another two set to open soon. Many are concentrated downtown, in some cases just feet away from each other. It’s something city and state officials recognize may leave some shops in the weeds.

The Bern Gallery, a glass-blowing and smoke shop on Main Street in Burlington, has been a downtown staple for several decades.

“It’s been a very long journey,” said Tito Bern, the shop’s owner. They added the dispensary when retail cannabis became legal, something Bern thought would be a slow burn. “I thought I would be an old man before I saw this.”

Bern says the dispensary offers a unique customer experience — and a location — that can’t be beat. “Having our footprint here in downtown Burlington was incredibly helpful,” he said.

Advertisement

Just a short walk over to Church Street is the Float On Cannabis Company. “We try to have a real nice vibe,” said the shop’s Mathew Hogg. “We do a lot of tourist activity. We have a lot of regular customers.”

The shop is tucked next to several other dispensaries within eyeshot. “If you want good cannabis, south end of Church Street in Burlington is the place to go and you got several to choose from,” Hogg said.

“I think it’s a totally over-saturated market here, especially downtown,” said Chloe Kunzelman, a University of Vermont student from New Jersey.

“I think there is a lot,” said Ryan Smith, another UVM student from Connecticut.

City officials agree, saying the soon-to-be 14 dispensaries are too many, too soon. “In my opinion, that’s a little bit of a saturation of the market,” said Kara Alnasrawi, the city’s director of business and workforce development.

Advertisement

Even the state’s Cannabis Control Board says it’s problematic. “We do have this unnatural distribution of where they are located,” said board chair James Pepper.

So how did we get to this point of pot proliferation? When retail cannabis became legal, the Legislature gave cities and towns local control. Some municipalities like Burlington voted to allow the new market while others, like nearby South Burlington and Williston, have never voted. “We have an uncapped licensing system which allows greater access to the market, which also does have this downside where we can hit this saturation and the board doesn’t have a lot of control to temper that,” Pepper said.

It’s not just a Burlington pot problem. Over saturation is happening in other Vermont towns, too. “We are seeing pockets of density around the state where other parts of the state have cannabis deserts,” Pepper said. for comparison, he says Burlington has only three liquor stores. “The department of liquor control does an economic analysis before they hand out a new license, whether this store is going to cannibalize this other store. We don’t have that authority.”

Without a cap on the number of dispensaries in the state, Pepper says some will undoubtedly fail. He predicts more towns will take action to limit growth. “We are going to see some more local control take place and some more shifts in the market that are going to result in that,” he said.

But city leaders like Alnasrawi argue they are hamstrung on how many dispensaries are approved, saying it’s not the city’s place. “It would be unprecedented for a municipality to control what types of establishments. As long as an establishment conforms to zoning and ordinance regulations, they are allowed to be open for business,” she said.

Advertisement

Elaine Young, the director of Champlain College’s marketing and communication program, says the prevalence of any one type of business — whether intended or not — sends a message to visitors.” If every other store is a cannabis shop, that starts to change the tone and tenor of what people expect from downtown. while any business is preferable to vacant storefronts, she says it’s the market that will eventually decide which will stay open.

Dispensary owners say they are aware of the competition but remain focused. “I think competition is the best. Competition is what spurs innovation, and I think innovation is the coolest,” Bern said.

“Our numbers are going up every month. So, we are getting more of the pie or the pie is getting bigger. I don’t know which is which,” Hogg said.

And those numbers could be even bigger without state laws restricting how dispensaries run ads and promotions. The rules are intended to protect underage Vermonters, but industry officials have so far been unsuccessful in getting lawmakers to modify them.

Advertisement



Source link

Vermont

ICE detains Ugandan asylum-seeker in Vermont despite fears of torture – The Boston Globe

Published

on

ICE detains Ugandan asylum-seeker in Vermont despite fears of torture – The Boston Globe


“It’s completely unforeseen, completely shocking, and outrageous that he would be detained,” said Will Lambek, an organizer with the Vermont advocacy group Migrant Justice.

ICE did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Seven Days first reported his detention.

Tendo, 41, has become a prominent community organizer in Vermont since relocating to the state in 2021.

An ordained Pentecostal minister, he has said that he faced political persecution and torture in Uganda after his charity, Eternal Life Organization International Ministries, criticized the Ugandan government. He has said that forces aligned with the authoritarian Museveni regime cut off two of his fingers, and that his brother and uncle were killed due to their political activities.

Advertisement

“The missing fingers on my left hand are a constant reminder of this brutality,” he wrote in a testimonial for his employer, the University of Vermont Medical Center.

A federal immigration judge denied Tendo’s asylum application in 2019. He spent two years in an immigration detention center in Texas — and later sued the Department of Homeland Security over his treatment there. Investigators for the department’s Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties have acknowledged wrongdoing.

Tendo has garnered support from prominent politicians. In 2020, US Representative Jim McGovern, a Massachusetts Democrat, wrote a letter signed by 44 members of Congress urging the federal government to release him.

In a written statement Wednesday, all three members of Vermont’s congressional delegation said they were “horrified” to learn of Tendo’s detention and called on the Trump administration to return him to Vermont and ensure due process.

“People like Pastor Tendo are exactly who our asylum system is meant to protect,” wrote Senators Bernie Sanders and Peter Welch and Representative Becca Balint.

Advertisement

Since relocating to Vermont, Tendo has appeared at an ICE facility in St. Albans for regularly scheduled check-ins — often accompanied by crowds of supporters. At one such check-in last July, he told the Globe he felt particularly nervous “because the agency we are dealing with is unpredictable.”

“The wave of fear, the kidnappings that have been happening, really, really make it very hard, even though you know you’re not a criminal,” he said.

Tendo had been scheduled for another check-in this Friday, according to his attorney, Brett Stokes. He had recently filed motions to reopen his asylum case, citing worsening conditions in Uganda, and for a new stay of removal.

Melissa Battah, executive director of Vermont Interfaith Action, said supporters had planned to accompany Tendo to Friday’s check-in. She called ICE “cowards” for detaining him in advance.

“Why send agents out and terrorize a community? To do what? To flex muscles? To show force?” she said. “This is not what a government should be doing to its people — to people they’re entrusted to serve and protect and take care of.”

Advertisement

Jacob Berkowitz, president of the UVMMC Support Staff United labor union, said Tendo had been working as a licensed nursing assistant while attending nursing school and moonlighting at the Shelburne facility.

“He’s the type of person we want around. He’s the type of guy we should have in this country,” Berkowitz said. “If only we all were in service to community, as Steven is, our country would be in a better place.”


Paul Heintz can be reached at paul.heintz@globe.com. Follow him on X @paulheintz.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Vermont

Here are the groups Vermont is funding to draw and keep new residents

Published

on

Here are the groups Vermont is funding to draw and keep new residents


The Vermont Department of Tourism and Marketing is funding 15 organizations through the Grants for Relocation Outreach Work program, according to a community announcement from the department.

The grants support efforts to attract and retain new residents.

The program, known as GROW, is considered a strategic investment in Vermont’s workforce and community vitality, said Lindsay Kurrle, secretary of the Agency of Commerce and Community Development, which oversees the department.

Advertisement

“By investing in locally led relocation and retention efforts, the program helps communities grow and reinforces the connections that keep new residents here,” Kurrle said.

The GROW program has two tracks: relocation and retention. Some organizations received grants for both tracks.

The relocation track supports the state’s relocation lead generation and distribution system via ThinkVermont.com. Grantees are required to connect with and follow up on leads of potential residents interested in moving to their area. Activities can include creating regional marketing assets for out-of-state advertising campaigns.

The organizations receiving relocation track grants are:

  • Addison County Economic Development Corporation
  • Brattleboro Development Credit Corporation
  • Chamber & Economic Development of the Rutland Region
  • Franklin County Industrial Development Corporation
  • Green Mountain Economic Development Corporation
  • Lake Champlain Regional Chamber of Commerce
  • Lamoille Economic Development Corporation
  • Montpelier Downtown Community Association
  • Northeast Kingdom Chamber of Commerce
  • Out in the Open
  • Southwestern Vermont Chamber of Commerce
  • Vermont Professionals of Color Network

The retention track focuses on organizing events and activities to help new residents feel welcome in their communities, such as mixers, young professionals’ groups and Vermont Welcome Wagon programming.

Advertisement

The organizations receiving retention track grants are:

  • Addison County Economic Development Corporation
  • Brattleboro Development Credit Corporation
  • Chamber & Economic Development of the Rutland Region
  • Chandler Center for the Arts
  • Lake Champlain Regional Chamber of Commerce
  • Montpelier Downtown Community Association
  • Southern Vermont Deerfield Valley Chamber of Commerce
  • Northeast Kingdom Chamber of Commerce
  • Southwestern Vermont Chamber of Commerce
  • Vermont Professionals of Color Network
  • Vital Communities

Over the past two years, GROW funding has supported the relocation of 95 families, or 193 new Vermonters, according to the announcement. Retention of new residents is also a key focus of the program.

“GROW helps Vermont do more than attract new residents,” said Tinotenda Rutanhira, executive director of business development at the Vermont Professionals of Color Network. “It ensures people of color who choose Vermont can connect, contribute and stay long term. This work attracts more people to Vermont, increases diversity, strengthens our local economies and makes Vermont a stronger, more resilient state.”

The grants are approved for two-year periods and will run through 2027. Grantees are required to submit monthly reports and deliverables specific to their approved scope of work to track progress and make any adjustments as necessary in their activities to meet GROW program goals.

This story was created by reporter Beth McDermott, bmcdermott1@usatodayco.com, with the assistance of Artificial Intelligence (AI). Journalists were involved in every step of the information gathering, review, editing and publishing process. Learn more at cm.usatoday.com/ethical-conduct.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Vermont

Tie-breaking vote sends controversial nominee to Vermont Supreme Court

Published

on

Tie-breaking vote sends controversial nominee to Vermont Supreme Court


Republican Lt. Gov. John Rodgers cast a tie-breaking vote in the Senate Tuesday to elevate a controversial nominee to Vermont’s highest court.

When Michael Drescher was appointed by Republican Gov. Phil Scott to fill a vacancy on the Vermont Supreme Court last month, he arrived to the confirmation process with what most Democratic lawmakers considered a disqualifying flaw.

As the acting U.S. attorney for Vermont, Drescher led the Trump administration’s high-profile prosecutions of two students, Mohsen Mahdawi and Rümeysa Öztürk, both of whom were arrested and detained by federal immigration authorities last year for their outspoken criticism of the war in Gaza.

During confirmation hearings in the Senate Judiciary Committee, Drescher told lawmakers that he took the lead on those cases to spare his assistants from the stain of association with President Donald Trump’s immigration crackdown. He also said it would be “unfair to conclude that I somehow personally supported the policies of the government simply because I was an advocate for those policies in court.”

Advertisement

“Would I have preferred somebody else to have been in the trenches in that case? Absolutely, but that would have been the wrong thing to do as a leader of the office,” Drescher said last month.

Those reassurances did little to win over the 17 Democrats in the Vermont Senate, all but two of whom voted to oppose his nomination Tuesday.

“At the end of the day, he did make arguments that were for the purpose of vindicating the unconstitutional detention of two individuals.”

Windham County Sen. Nader Hashim

Windham County Sen. Nader Hashim, the Democratic chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said that while Drescher hadn’t acted “in an unethical way,” he nonetheless sacrificed the public trust.

Advertisement

“At the end of the day, he did make arguments that were for the purpose of vindicating the unconstitutional detention of two individuals,” Hashim said.

Hashim said hundreds of Vermonters have reached out to him to oppose Drescher’s nomination, which he viewed as reason enough to deny Drescher one of five seats on the bench.

Brian Stevenson

/

Vermont Public

Advertisement
Windham County Sen. Nader Hashim, the Democratic chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said Drescher’s role in the Trump administration’s immigration crackdown cost him the trust of Vermonters.

“The social contract between the government and the governed is increasingly fragile, and voting contrary to the many voices of Vermonters would only further contribute to that fragility,” Hashim said.

Bennington County Sen. Robert Plunkett, one of only two Democrats to join all 13 Republicans in support of Drescher’s nomination, cited preservation of that social contract as the reason for his “yes” vote.

Plunkett said he entered the nomination process eager to vote against Drescher.

“I wanted this to be the moment when Vermont stands up and says, ‘It stops here,’” he said. “I wanted to cast a vote that felt like resistance.”

But upon further reflection, and after a long conversation with Drescher, Plunkett reversed course. Had Drescher resigned in protest, Plunkett said, the Trump administration might have replaced him with a functionary who was “willing to bend the rules” in ways that prolonged the detentions of the students.

Advertisement

Plunkett said authoritarian governments rely on the corruption of institutions.

“That happens not just by installing loyalists, but by purging everyone who isn’t,” he said.

By “punishing” Drescher for performing his role in the legal processes that undergird democracy, Plunkett said, “we risk doing that work ourselves.”

Rodgers, who broke the 15-15 tie Tuesday, said Drescher “showed tremendous courage” and has been the subject of “unfair abuse by people in the public that don’t know all the facts.”

Rodgers said he recently had an hourlong phone conversation with Drescher.

Advertisement

“He explained he feared that if he resigned, that the Trump administration would appoint somebody like they have in other districts, who was highly partisan, and that would have been bad for the state of Vermont,” Rodgers said.

In a written statement Tuesday, Scott called Drescher “an exemplary public servant.”

The Senate also voted 23-7 Tuesday to confirm a second Supreme Court nominee, Christina Nolan, who ran unsuccessfully for the U.S. Senate as a Republican in 2022.

Nolan served as U.S. attorney for Vermont during Trump’s first term.

Justices can serve multiple six-year terms on the Vermont Supreme Court so nominations for the bench are rare. Rarer still, and perhaps unprecedented, is for two seats to become vacant at the same time.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending